Maybe you can answer something I've never understood. I've worked at a lot of places, and have had my hands in on sendmail ever so often, but never had the problem that others seem to have when maintaining mail servers.
What exactly breaks on those things that you have to tinker with? Upgrades? Patches? Just flat out failures?
Why are people surprised by this? Microsoft has been doing this for years now, and even as part of a recent settlement in a court case. "No monopoly....ok! Sure!...and as a settlement, we'll let you have all this free software!"
The scary thing is, some kids are now being taught things like PowerPoint in middle school....
It's not 30 cents per kWh. It's between 58 cents and 1.58 cents, depending on where you live. That's between 594 kWh at the low end price, and 218 kWh usage, neither of which is high.
In any event, bitching about this guy using "too much" is complaining to the wrong person. Davis is the one that locked in these contracts, and he's to blame, not the poor guy trying to pay his bills.
So now they are useing the money they stole from you durning the energy crisis to block a balenced buget (The republicans in the state senate only voted OK after the buget increased spending)
er, you have no idea how much electricity this person consumes... he just told you what his power bill was. There's no way for you to make a judgement call if you don't know what the power consumption actually was. For all you know, he has a studio apartment.
Sorry, but if that were true, it still would have happened before. There are enough pissed off people with a lot of money at any given time, no matter who the governer is, that they'd fork over the cash to do this.
Nope, this has to do with Davis' massive screwups.
The IRV thing seems to be rigged to circumvent the law that's on the books in California. The process of doing the recall is to get the person in office out of there, and to keep them out (as opposed to what Davis tried to do earlier in this process, which was to get himself onto the ballot too).
If they don't like the idea of having recalls, the recall law should be changed. They shouldn't be thinking of ways to circumvent it.
The ACLU is defending NAMBLA, an organization that has members that raped and killed a young boy. In that trial, the ACLU is trying to get a gag order in the case, so no one can talk about it. So much for free speech.
The Boy Scouts didn't benefit from public monies. On the contrary, the community that they lived in did. The Boy Scouts put MILLIONS of dollars into that place, didn't dictate who could be there.
Despite what you say about the gay community, the Boy Scouts didn't stand in the way of them having activities there. If they had, then you would have a point, but they didn't, and you don't either.
You act like the people that the ACLU defends aren't bigotted... well, they are. They're anti-religion bigots.
Back to the point: The ACLU is bigoted against religion. Period.
If you don't like people forcing their moral views on you, don't expect other people to like it when you force YOUR moral views on THEM, which is exactly what you're saying.
Just say NO to the ACLU
on
Joining the ACLU?
·
· Score: 1, Interesting
When I read things like this
article
it makes me realize how much of political organization the ACLU is. They can't get laws passed, so they argue to activist judges to interpret the law the way they want.
I mean seriously, this judge ruled that the Boy Scouts, who tended that property, spent MILLIONS of dollars doing so and let ANYONE use it, needed to be thrown out of there? Give me a break.
Sorry, but this is just an ACLU vendetta against the Boy Scouts, plain and simple.
This lawsuit NEVER would have happened if it were any other sort of organization with religious ties... It's just that their a Christian organization, and they're anti-Christian. Plain and simple.
To the original poster... if you can live with anti-religion bigots like that.... well, that's up to you.
The ACLU is a bully. In many cases, they go after the small guy, bullying them in court cases which the small guy can't pay for, and settle out of court.
Slashdot Mirror
Maybe you can answer something I've never understood. I've worked at a lot of places, and have had my hands in on sendmail ever so often, but never had the problem that others seem to have when maintaining mail servers.
What exactly breaks on those things that you have to tinker with? Upgrades? Patches? Just flat out failures?
Earlier models of Roomba? No, those always cost $200. You must be thinking of another brand...
Source, from Mosaic...which the company Eolas didn't license, but distributed on their website...
The scary thing is, some kids are now being taught things like PowerPoint in middle school....
There already is a Cave Quake
Yet more evidence
If you'd read the articles, you'd see that the experts are saying that the economy is improving now, and it has been for some time.
You're wrong.
More evidence
Yet more evidence today
It's not 30 cents per kWh. It's between 58 cents and 1.58 cents, depending on where you live. That's between 594 kWh at the low end price, and 218 kWh usage, neither of which is high.
In any event, bitching about this guy using "too much" is complaining to the wrong person. Davis is the one that locked in these contracts, and he's to blame, not the poor guy trying to pay his bills.
Just because you use capital letters and bold fonts doesn't make what you're saying true.
The stock market doing better is an indication of companies and the economy doing better.
People refinance when interest rates go low, housing starts are indicators of a pick up in the economy.
Face it, the economy is getting better.
I totally agree. They're so desperate for an issue to run on, they'll say anything.
The stock market and the housing market are indicators of how the economy is doing.
The stock market going up means more companies will be hiring.
Housing starts mean more labor is being employed.
The jobless rate in June was 6.4%, last month is was 6.2%, and is headed downward.
Yeah, but people would use a write-in or some other dumb thing to try and keep Davis in there.
IRV is just a way to stuff the ballot box for one party, and it would be used like that.
The system we've been using works. Just leave it at that.
Yeah, it's doing a lot better now, especially the new 17-year High in housing starts and the fact that the NASDAQ has hit a 16-month high.
Thanks for pointing that out!
he's been hanging with?
Link please.
Unforunatly only the rich part happened because the republicans ran idoiot #1 Bill Simon.
Actually, Davis helped in making sure Simon would run by doing an attack campaign against Richard Riordan, the opponent that could have beat him.
So now they are useing the money they stole from you durning the energy crisis to block a balenced buget (The republicans in the state senate only voted OK after the buget increased spending)
Again, Link please.
I'm sorry but you don't live in reality
I'd say that goes double for you...
er, you have no idea how much electricity this person consumes... he just told you what his power bill was. There's no way for you to make a judgement call if you don't know what the power consumption actually was. For all you know, he has a studio apartment.
Sorry, but if that were true, it still would have happened before. There are enough pissed off people with a lot of money at any given time, no matter who the governer is, that they'd fork over the cash to do this.
Nope, this has to do with Davis' massive screwups.
The IRV thing seems to be rigged to circumvent the law that's on the books in California. The process of doing the recall is to get the person in office out of there, and to keep them out (as opposed to what Davis tried to do earlier in this process, which was to get himself onto the ballot too).
If they don't like the idea of having recalls, the recall law should be changed. They shouldn't be thinking of ways to circumvent it.
The ACLU is defending NAMBLA, an organization that has members that raped and killed a young boy. In that trial, the ACLU is trying to get a gag order in the case, so no one can talk about it. So much for free speech.
Check out this interview with the person that brought the suit.
The Boy Scouts didn't benefit from public monies. On the contrary, the community that they lived in did. The Boy Scouts put MILLIONS of dollars into that place, didn't dictate who could be there.
Despite what you say about the gay community, the Boy Scouts didn't stand in the way of them having activities there. If they had, then you would have a point, but they didn't, and you don't either.
You act like the people that the ACLU defends aren't bigotted... well, they are. They're anti-religion bigots.
Back to the point: The ACLU is bigoted against religion. Period.
If you don't like people forcing their moral views on you, don't expect other people to like it when you force YOUR moral views on THEM, which is exactly what you're saying.
I mean seriously, this judge ruled that the Boy Scouts, who tended that property, spent MILLIONS of dollars doing so and let ANYONE use it, needed to be thrown out of there? Give me a break.
Sorry, but this is just an ACLU vendetta against the Boy Scouts, plain and simple.
This lawsuit NEVER would have happened if it were any other sort of organization with religious ties... It's just that their a Christian organization, and they're anti-Christian. Plain and simple.
To the original poster... if you can live with anti-religion bigots like that.... well, that's up to you.
Fortunately, there are instances where that doesn't always work.
Apparently they've forgotten that's freedom OF religion, not freedom FROM religion.