" You know, I don't understand this slashdot obsession with MSCE or other MS certified professional."
Here, let me try to give you perspective:
"I don't understand why a good administrator of a Windows 2003 server in a Windows shop..."
I never made this claim, that's your first error.
"...has to have anything but an encyclopedic knowledge of Linux or Macs."
Since you did make statement, I'll comment: They don't and typically they do not even have an encycolpedic knowledge either, at best it tends to be at dictionary level.**
"Companies hiring MS certified pros do so because they want them to manage their MS network."
That is fine. Again, I never commented on this scenario. Since you did, I'll add this: If a company wants to limit its options by living in a sandbox of knowledge, that is definitely within the rights of said company. None of the Windows, Linux, Macs/*BSD, Unix flavors is a silver bullet solution for everything. Now if your average MSCE/MS wants skills that go beyond encyclopedic knowledge of computers, they won't limit themselves to Microsoft being the only thing in the world that exists.
Now since you managed to post your response, are you implying that the average MSCE is _NOT_ a zealot/fanboy/whatever of Microsoft?** I'm asking because you didn't address this, the point I was making, in your response at all. If unclear, re-read my original post; I'm not taking sides here...nor talking about grandma and her e-mail/browsing or your average end users workstation. I wasn't talking about a Microsoft only shop either. I was talking about the so called admins that think they are. I am _now_ expanding it to developers as well.
My own personal experience has shown me that a Microsoft zealot tends to be more overbearing than a Linux/Mac/*BSD zealot combined.*** This is a local perspective view and I am open to the fact that this is not the actual case view of every single person on the planet. The fact you see this as a "slashdot obession" adds weight that I am not alone in my opinion but I hate to use slashbot mentality to give weight to my statement. (I could very easily see, and agree, it as a condemnation - hence the elaboration on my part)
** Again, another generalization so exceptions will be certain. This does not read as every MSCE/MS pro but it does include a lot of them so please do not summarily dimiss my point by use of one.
*** A zealot on either side is still a zealot. Agree to disagree with me on everything else but that is a true statement and my original point. There is nothing to be accomplished by singling out one camp, they exists in both. How come Microsoft supporters do not see nor admit this when the issue or accusations come up? Oh yeah, you can't be rational with a zealot...duh!
"... he mentions that the use of const, virtual functions, abstract functions, and other constructs can reflect design decisions"
The nexus here is the inability of people to agree on a level of competency to understand how true Meyers, and your post, are. C++ is not only capable of showing what the code does (duh, it has to) but also reflecting design decisions. The only reason I can understand the people that do not accept this is because of limited understanding or total lack of it.
Given its "hardcore" industrial toughness, C++ is an elegant [and complicated] language; all things considered. Like it or not, it is successful at acheiving its primary goals and then some.
Yes - it has its warts, as well as its beauty. People often show disdain for things they don't understand more times than not by default as opposed to having valid reasons for doing so. Obviously it is not a silver bullet but it is an effective bullet. Boils down to who holds the gun.
"The setups were hypothetical, however. Both were in the most basic configuration, an approach that some in the audience suggested may tilt the results in favor of Windows, which comes with more features.
Ford said the idea was to represent what an average system administrator may do, as opposed to a "wizard" who could take extra steps to provide plenty of security on a Linux setup, for instance.
The presentation was a preview of a report they plan to issue in 30 days"
This article doesn't present anything actually news worthy in my opinion but I would be interested in seeing the actual study.
I am skeptical from the standpoint of what I have highlighted in bold, but again, the actual study may flesh out more details about what constitutes "average", etc. and the criteria used to determine these factors. So as it stands, I am in no position to refute or praise anything regarding this study.
Everything aside, computers networked with access to users are insecure, period; regardless of your OS. I have no study just my own empirical knowledge to back this claim up. I like to refer to it as common sense. Now if a study comes out that proves my root perception wrong, then I would be suprised at the results.
Such emotion. Wear the mod as a badge of honor against group think!
I tried to have a discussion with you previously (diffent article altogether) and you attempted to turn things around playing silly games and twisted context. (Nicely done too by the way, props!)
Personally I do not think your a troll. A little too pompous and arrogant for my taste but I do find you entertaining to watch regardless, specifically your debating style. Creepy - does this constitute a/. stalker?::snicker::
A quick note: I obviously did not mod you or otherwise the moderations would have been deleted responding to your post, so please do not attempt to go down that road with me. Think of this as an abrasive compliment; without foul language.
To try to be somewhat on topic with your previous post: No, I don't think outdated textbooks are a good idea, especially if the material dates quickly. Shame that some domestic needs take backseat to foreign policy needs that often seem ungrateful about the actions anyway. But what do I know, I think water is wet...::shrugs::
"Making accusations of ad-hominem attacks after calling me a "fanboy" is cute"*
That's rich. Check the thread again instead of your selective history. Here's some help . Have a nice day.
*Additional note - my reference to you being a fanboy has nothing at all to do with being a "linux fanboy" and I can see how that may have caused some confusion, especially to YOU. Apologies on that one, really.
" Congratulations, you made an entire post, yet failed to give ONE example of why Linus' views on this matter." Narrow response to a direct question - you are correct, his opinion does not matter, including yours or mine. Only the people passing the legislation, the law enforcement to police it, and the judicial system to make it legit matter.
"He's not an expert, he has no more experience in the field than thousands of others, yet his opinion counts more." Bad articulation on my part aside, this was not the claim I was making. My claim is companies have been building patent portfolios for quiet sometime. All of the sudden they have become a hot button issue in the "geek community", why? Alternative OS's have been around for how long? Companies have come and gone how many times? Cross-licensing of patents has existed for how long?
So his work, pushed by some zealot style groups, backed by some big company names, encroaching upon big company markets and his opinion does not matter? One could argue that because of him this has become an issue of discussion that nobody seen coming in '93 because of an itch he wanted to scratch. Not the argument I want to make, but one could. I never claimed his opinion "counts more" only that is opinion is interesting to hear because of what he has done directly and affected indirectly. (Look at my other response to the parent of this thread you responded)
"I USE linux (several varieties) but you'll never find more than a grudging approval of the goals. I strongly feel that for many things, all versions of Linux are inadequate." OK - noted. You and I are not so different on this subject, as open ended as you left it.
The abrasive, ad-hominem style responses you consistently make aside [not that it matters with my "clear inability to analyze information"], this is a lin-centric site and that is why it matters and is considered news. We are not all slashbots though and some of us consider it news for other reasons while others of us consider it inane commentary.
I concede to you and your salient points of why he [Linus] is just another name and should be considered as such. I was a fanboy till you enlightened me. What will I do without my holy cause now? Thanks a lot - I'm screwed now ya know, since I can't think for myself or analyze information for that matter. Wait! There is always R. Enderle - he can guide me now.
"...This is one frigging guy we're talking about. Nothing about him makes his opinion special or important, except to fanboys."
Actually, he is rather important. Because of him, the Linux kernel is a reality. Combined with the efforts of others (like the entire GNU contributors), big companies are resorting to this issue as a result to retain their business model*. None of this is new. IBM has patented many things long before Linux ever came to be. I use IBM because it seems to be the company to love this week and not to pick on Microsoft. Granted Microsoft announces publicly in 2004 that software patents are a key aspect to their future success. Only thing left in the 'chest to fight with? IBM is the true 400lb Gorilla here in this case, but not the only one capable of playing this game.
"And if you're about to post a snide rebuttal, then YOU are one of those fanboys."
Actually, a quick perusal of your posting history shows you to be quiet the fanboy. I couldn't care less.
"Because I'm right, and you're not."
I see it more that you have an opinion, and much like mine can be, are not always correct.
*I base this on the local perception I see more litigation than innovation coming out of the business sector.
I believe this has more to do with the fact that he is someone that does [as in can accomplish things]. He leaves the political and legal parties to their own while he does his own thing.
Until he is pulled into a mess, seemingly due to his being successful, he does not typically rock the boat by dictating policies of what they should or should not be, unless it is something of his own creation - much as it should be [in general]
"Those people will just not update their systems through Windows Update...still don't bother to update their systems because they don't know or don't care to know."
There are some people that are not tech savvy and will not update because they do not trust what Microsoft may be doing on "their" computer during this process, even if all their software is legit. I have seen it first hand numerous times.
Of course if they feel that way, why use it - right? A monopoly is a hard thing to ignore.
Never do anything on a computer in which you would have a problem with your SO, religious leader, law enforcement, employer, friend, and someone you never met standing behind your shoulder watching as you do it.
TFA also says and more telling as well as supportive of your comment: Microsoft's Web site sells Outlook as a stand-alone product for $109. This is the first time Microsoft has offered any of its Office products on a subscription basis.
Trully innovative that company is. I mean this new "vision" they have is, like, so 70's.
Unfortunate but understandable. Lurk in IRC, freenode.net #linuxhelp for example - just a an hour or two at that, to why both "unfortunate" & "understandable"
3. You RTFA, to find out it's a decade old and deals mainly with Bus mice that don't exist anymore. There's a section on Serial mice, which doesn't help because yours is USB.
Part of the reason you run into #2 on your list. This should have been step #1. Agreed this does not address your immediate problem but it would curtail the childish responses because you tried to do something on your own time before expecting someone else to spend theirs.
4. Return to forum, where you are told "USB mice are only for gay MS astroturfers like you!! Why don't you go have sex with Bill Gates you stupid fag!"
No reason for this. I feel for you in the fact that yes this can actually happen.
5. Say "fuck it" and just use the USB to PS/2 adaptor because USB support for linux still sucks.
Hey - Problem solved! One of a few different ones you actually have.
Honestly, I've never gotten an answer to any question on any linux forum or IRC channel. The self-titled "linux gurus" frankly don't know all that much. When it comes to linux, if your shit doesn't work out-of-the-box, you're on your own for the most part.
I am in a minority group as I can actually read source code as well as make changes to it when the need arises. Both in kernel space and user land apps & libs; so being on "my own" is not a big deal at all. It is dishearting to hear you make these statements because not only myself but others I know, and many I do not, have contributed in ways directly opposite of that which you just described. True that your experience is definitely in the realm of happening and for that it is a shame.
Go read the CUPS documentation, which is basically a longwinded, insulting "Don't you dare ask us any questions we're too important" treatise.
Similar to, say, MPlayer? There is a reason for the arrogance. Not excusing it, just pointing it out. FAQ's for example come from a lot of frustration of answering the same things over and over and yet people will not read these either. Frankly your attitude, and other like it, are insulting to the people like me that are not like this. I say this because on occasion I have spoon fed the NOOB knowing that I shouldn't but also knowing there are way too many "self-proclaimed linux gurus" ready to pounce with a "U R TEH SUCK!" which is also just has harmful.
But hey, with every blanket statement is an exception. Generalizations in general are bad. Etc, etc, etc.
Linux isn't ready for the mainstream desktop*. My opinion and probably wrong. Linux is ready for people with a genuine interest in tinkering with it, learning it, contributing to it, and in general having fun with it. If you don't show that then yes I will concede you get a lot of elitism attitude for the most part, or call it what you want but agreed it isn't helpful. I strongly disagree that if you show the least bit of effort and any of the aforementioned qualities that people will act like a dick towards you though.
*Any more than windows is ready for the networked world. They both still do though...
Your post is right on for every level it addresses including the obvious one which will still probably be overlooked by the majority of people that do read it. Shame really...
I have not looked at the latest code base so my response may very well be wrong, however you may want to keep this in mind when making such a statment:
Perhaps one reason is they are not really using C++ to its fullest extent like here as an example.
"BTW it is also quite ridiculous how they frequently charge with 8 different things for a single crime, and they can all potentially stick and the penalties add up.They should only be able to charge with the most serious one the crime qualifies for."
You do not truly under the nature of the criminal system, the D.A., and kick-back funding plus political aspirations. They all combine to make a pretty effective machine that does not care about you as a person in the least bit.
It's a machine that works well for the purpose it is being used for; not for the reasons it was intended to address.
Simple. You fail to understand the issue because you are trying to apply rational thought to a slew of irrational laws that have been passed.
This is a simple case of a somebody being stupid at a time when it really is not the thing to be doing right now due to the fear-mongering laws to protect against these things as though they will actually stop somebody/group that is detemined.
Slashdot Mirror
" You know, I don't understand this slashdot obsession with MSCE or other MS certified professional."
Here, let me try to give you perspective:
"I don't understand why a good administrator of a Windows 2003 server in a Windows shop..."
I never made this claim, that's your first error.
"...has to have anything but an encyclopedic knowledge of Linux or Macs."
Since you did make statement, I'll comment: They don't and typically they do not even have an encycolpedic knowledge either, at best it tends to be at dictionary level.**
"Companies hiring MS certified pros do so because they want them to manage their MS network."
That is fine. Again, I never commented on this scenario. Since you did, I'll add this: If a company wants to limit its options by living in a sandbox of knowledge, that is definitely within the rights of said company. None of the Windows, Linux, Macs/*BSD, Unix flavors is a silver bullet solution for everything. Now if your average MSCE/MS wants skills that go beyond encyclopedic knowledge of computers, they won't limit themselves to Microsoft being the only thing in the world that exists.
Now since you managed to post your response, are you implying that the average MSCE is _NOT_ a zealot/fanboy/whatever of Microsoft?** I'm asking because you didn't address this, the point I was making, in your response at all. If unclear, re-read my original post; I'm not taking sides here...nor talking about grandma and her e-mail/browsing or your average end users workstation. I wasn't talking about a Microsoft only shop either. I was talking about the so called admins that think they are. I am _now_ expanding it to developers as well.
My own personal experience has shown me that a Microsoft zealot tends to be more overbearing than a Linux/Mac/*BSD zealot combined.*** This is a local perspective view and I am open to the fact that this is not the actual case view of every single person on the planet. The fact you see this as a "slashdot obession" adds weight that I am not alone in my opinion but I hate to use slashbot mentality to give weight to my statement. (I could very easily see, and agree, it as a condemnation - hence the elaboration on my part)
** Again, another generalization so exceptions will be certain. This does not read as every MSCE/MS pro but it does include a lot of them so please do not summarily dimiss my point by use of one.
*** A zealot on either side is still a zealot. Agree to disagree with me on everything else but that is a true statement and my original point. There is nothing to be accomplished by singling out one camp, they exists in both. How come Microsoft supporters do not see nor admit this when the issue or accusations come up? Oh yeah, you can't be rational with a zealot...duh!
And while I don't disagree with the spirit of your post, make sure the MSCE* people learn that too.
*Primarily speaking of the so called admins that never ran anything besides Windows and possibly DOS. They tend to be overly fanatical as well.
"... he mentions that the use of const, virtual functions, abstract functions, and other constructs can reflect design decisions"
The nexus here is the inability of people to agree on a level of competency to understand how true Meyers, and your post, are. C++ is not only capable of showing what the code does (duh, it has to) but also reflecting design decisions. The only reason I can understand the people that do not accept this is because of limited understanding or total lack of it.
Given its "hardcore" industrial toughness, C++ is an elegant [and complicated] language; all things considered. Like it or not, it is successful at acheiving its primary goals and then some.
Yes - it has its warts, as well as its beauty. People often show disdain for things they don't understand more times than not by default as opposed to having valid reasons for doing so. Obviously it is not a silver bullet but it is an effective bullet. Boils down to who holds the gun.
"The setups were hypothetical, however. Both were in the most basic configuration, an approach that some in the audience suggested may tilt the results in favor of Windows, which comes with more features.
Ford said the idea was to represent what an average system administrator may do, as opposed to a "wizard" who could take extra steps to provide plenty of security on a Linux setup, for instance.
The presentation was a preview of a report they plan to issue in 30 days"
This article doesn't present anything actually news worthy in my opinion but I would be interested in seeing the actual study.
I am skeptical from the standpoint of what I have highlighted in bold, but again, the actual study may flesh out more details about what constitutes "average", etc. and the criteria used to determine these factors. So as it stands, I am in no position to refute or praise anything regarding this study.
Everything aside, computers networked with access to users are insecure, period; regardless of your OS. I have no study just my own empirical knowledge to back this claim up. I like to refer to it as common sense. Now if a study comes out that proves my root perception wrong, then I would be suprised at the results.
Such emotion. Wear the mod as a badge of honor against group think!
/. stalker? ::snicker::
I tried to have a discussion with you previously (diffent article altogether) and you attempted to turn things around playing silly games and twisted context. (Nicely done too by the way, props!)
Personally I do not think your a troll. A little too pompous and arrogant for my taste but I do find you entertaining to watch regardless, specifically your debating style. Creepy - does this constitute a
A quick note: I obviously did not mod you or otherwise the moderations would have been deleted responding to your post, so please do not attempt to go down that road with me. Think of this as an abrasive compliment; without foul language.
To try to be somewhat on topic with your previous post: No, I don't think outdated textbooks are a good idea, especially if the material dates quickly. Shame that some domestic needs take backseat to foreign policy needs that often seem ungrateful about the actions anyway. But what do I know, I think water is wet...::shrugs::
"Making accusations of ad-hominem attacks after calling me a "fanboy" is cute"*
That's rich. Check the thread again instead of your selective history. Here's some help . Have a nice day.
*Additional note - my reference to you being a fanboy has nothing at all to do with being a "linux fanboy" and I can see how that may have caused some confusion, especially to YOU. Apologies on that one, really.
" Congratulations, you made an entire post, yet failed to give ONE example of why Linus' views on this matter."
Narrow response to a direct question - you are correct, his opinion does not matter, including yours or mine. Only the people passing the legislation, the law enforcement to police it, and the judicial system to make it legit matter.
"He's not an expert, he has no more experience in the field than thousands of others, yet his opinion counts more."
Bad articulation on my part aside, this was not the claim I was making. My claim is companies have been building patent portfolios for quiet sometime. All of the sudden they have become a hot button issue in the "geek community", why? Alternative OS's have been around for how long? Companies have come and gone how many times? Cross-licensing of patents has existed for how long?
So his work, pushed by some zealot style groups, backed by some big company names, encroaching upon big company markets and his opinion does not matter? One could argue that because of him this has become an issue of discussion that nobody seen coming in '93 because of an itch he wanted to scratch. Not the argument I want to make, but one could. I never claimed his opinion "counts more" only that is opinion is interesting to hear because of what he has done directly and affected indirectly. (Look at my other response to the parent of this thread you responded)
"I USE linux (several varieties) but you'll never find more than a grudging approval of the goals. I strongly feel that for many things, all versions of Linux are inadequate."
OK - noted. You and I are not so different on this subject, as open ended as you left it.
The abrasive, ad-hominem style responses you consistently make aside [not that it matters with my "clear inability to analyze information"], this is a lin-centric site and that is why it matters and is considered news. We are not all slashbots though and some of us consider it news for other reasons while others of us consider it inane commentary.
I concede to you and your salient points of why he [Linus] is just another name and should be considered as such. I was a fanboy till you enlightened me. What will I do without my holy cause now? Thanks a lot - I'm screwed now ya know, since I can't think for myself or analyze information for that matter. Wait! There is always R. Enderle - he can guide me now.
"Bullshit" indeed...
"...This is one frigging guy we're talking about. Nothing about him makes his opinion special or important, except to fanboys."
Actually, he is rather important. Because of him, the Linux kernel is a reality. Combined with the efforts of others (like the entire GNU contributors), big companies are resorting to this issue as a result to retain their business model*. None of this is new. IBM has patented many things long before Linux ever came to be. I use IBM because it seems to be the company to love this week and not to pick on Microsoft. Granted Microsoft announces publicly in 2004 that software patents are a key aspect to their future success. Only thing left in the 'chest to fight with? IBM is the true 400lb Gorilla here in this case, but not the only one capable of playing this game.
"And if you're about to post a snide rebuttal, then YOU are one of those fanboys."
Actually, a quick perusal of your posting history shows you to be quiet the fanboy. I couldn't care less.
"Because I'm right, and you're not."
I see it more that you have an opinion, and much like mine can be, are not always correct.
*I base this on the local perception I see more litigation than innovation coming out of the business sector.
" why has he waited so long?"
I believe this has more to do with the fact that he is someone that does [as in can accomplish things]. He leaves the political and legal parties to their own while he does his own thing.
Until he is pulled into a mess, seemingly due to his being successful, he does not typically rock the boat by dictating policies of what they should or should not be, unless it is something of his own creation - much as it should be [in general]
That's my take on it - could be wrong though...
"I, for one, look forward to the day when I can think code and have it be done instead of writing it line-by-line."
So you have aspirations to be in management or an end user? I'm not clear here.
"Those people will just not update their systems through Windows Update...still don't bother to update their systems because they don't know or don't care to know."
There are some people that are not tech savvy and will not update because they do not trust what Microsoft may be doing on "their" computer during this process, even if all their software is legit. I have seen it first hand numerous times.
Of course if they feel that way, why use it - right? A monopoly is a hard thing to ignore.
Paranoid about computer security?
Never do anything on a computer in which you would have a problem with your SO, religious leader, law enforcement, employer, friend, and someone you never met standing behind your shoulder watching as you do it.
Starting Score: -1 points
Moderation +1
100% Interesting
with:
"They say there are no guarantees the system will even prevent piracy, nor will it prevent huge black cocks from entering Michael's ass."
Guess Michael and mods missed this one, eh?
TFA also says and more telling as well as supportive of your comment:
Microsoft's Web site sells Outlook as a stand-alone product for $109. This is the first time Microsoft has offered any of its Office products on a subscription basis.
Trully innovative that company is. I mean this new "vision" they have is, like, so 70's.
...
You are celebrating that the FBI has thrown away their lock picks and not realizing that Congress has removed all your doors.
Apologies for a "Me too post" but well put.
1. Go ask in a linux forum
Reasonable.
2. Get told RTFA YOU FUCKIN N00B! U R TEH SUCK!
Unfortunate but understandable. Lurk in IRC, freenode.net #linuxhelp for example - just a an hour or two at that, to why both "unfortunate" & "understandable"
3. You RTFA, to find out it's a decade old and deals mainly with Bus mice that don't exist anymore. There's a section on Serial mice, which doesn't help because yours is USB.
Part of the reason you run into #2 on your list. This should have been step #1. Agreed this does not address your immediate problem but it would curtail the childish responses because you tried to do something on your own time before expecting someone else to spend theirs.
4. Return to forum, where you are told "USB mice are only for gay MS astroturfers like you!! Why don't you go have sex with Bill Gates you stupid fag!"
No reason for this. I feel for you in the fact that yes this can actually happen.
5. Say "fuck it" and just use the USB to PS/2 adaptor because USB support for linux still sucks.
Hey - Problem solved! One of a few different ones you actually have.
Honestly, I've never gotten an answer to any question on any linux forum or IRC channel. The self-titled "linux gurus" frankly don't know all that much. When it comes to linux, if your shit doesn't work out-of-the-box, you're on your own for the most part.
I am in a minority group as I can actually read source code as well as make changes to it when the need arises. Both in kernel space and user land apps & libs; so being on "my own" is not a big deal at all. It is dishearting to hear you make these statements because not only myself but others I know, and many I do not, have contributed in ways directly opposite of that which you just described. True that your experience is definitely in the realm of happening and for that it is a shame.
Go read the CUPS documentation, which is basically a longwinded, insulting "Don't you dare ask us any questions we're too important" treatise.
Similar to, say, MPlayer? There is a reason for the arrogance. Not excusing it, just pointing it out. FAQ's for example come from a lot of frustration of answering the same things over and over and yet people will not read these either. Frankly your attitude, and other like it, are insulting to the people like me that are not like this. I say this because on occasion I have spoon fed the NOOB knowing that I shouldn't but also knowing there are way too many "self-proclaimed linux gurus" ready to pounce with a "U R TEH SUCK!" which is also just has harmful.
But hey, with every blanket statement is an exception. Generalizations in general are bad. Etc, etc, etc.
Linux isn't ready for the mainstream desktop*. My opinion and probably wrong. Linux is ready for people with a genuine interest in tinkering with it, learning it, contributing to it, and in general having fun with it. If you don't show that then yes I will concede you get a lot of elitism attitude for the most part, or call it what you want but agreed it isn't helpful. I strongly disagree that if you show the least bit of effort and any of the aforementioned qualities that people will act like a dick towards you though.
*Any more than windows is ready for the networked world. They both still do though...
Well they do have daily 2.68 usec loss to deal with you know. Ease up man.
Your post is right on for every level it addresses including the obvious one which will still probably be overlooked by the majority of people that do read it. Shame really...
I have not looked at the latest code base so my response may very well be wrong, however you may want to keep this in mind when making such a statment:
Perhaps one reason is they are not really using C++ to its fullest extent like here as an example.
" 80 columns ought to be enough for anybody."
Although 72 seems to be the agreed upon protocol.
"BTW it is also quite ridiculous how they frequently charge with 8 different things for a single crime, and they can all potentially stick and the penalties add up.They should only be able to charge with the most serious one the crime qualifies for."
You do not truly under the nature of the criminal system, the D.A., and kick-back funding plus political aspirations. They all combine to make a pretty effective machine that does not care about you as a person in the least bit.
It's a machine that works well for the purpose it is being used for; not for the reasons it was intended to address.
Of course that argument falls on its face when you are later found guilty of lying about such events to the FBI.
YMMV of course.
"So what's going on?"
Simple. You fail to understand the issue because you are trying to apply rational thought to a slew of irrational laws that have been passed.
This is a simple case of a somebody being stupid at a time when it really is not the thing to be doing right now due to the fear-mongering laws to protect against these things as though they will actually stop somebody/group that is detemined.
"Terrorism is performed on mass scale..."
And a commercial jetliner is considered a vehicle for mass transportation* therefore covered under these guidelines.
*Note that the helicopter [which was used to locate him] is not considered and also not used as a charge against him.
" I would really like to know what he was thinking."
I'm pretty sure he wasn't.