Unfortunately, Tesla is a private company. They need every cent, which means that they cannot afford to kick their customers. Not even if they deserve it.
This is one of the many reasons, why private companies can't regulate these sort of things.
Only if it brings the car to a halt safely. Driving on while you are sleeping is a no go. We've seen Teslas killing their drivers and innocent people. They simply are nowhere near autonomous driving. Nobody is, not even Google.;-)
Nonetheless, it should detect when the driver isn't participating (sleeping, having a seizure) and bring the car to halt in a controlled manner + safe position (right side). It should also call an ambulance (driver pays it all).
Luxury cars always have a lower accident rate.
Now did they - or did they not - implement a technology to check if there is a driver for their non-autopilot "autopilots"?
Isn’t the technology supposed to detect that a driver is "non-responsive" and bring the car to a halt in a controlled manner? Those idiots should not be seen cruising around; they should be parked at the right side, call for emergency already sent (they’d then have to pay for their "nap").
This is Tesla’s fault. Either they have no such detection or it’s broken (deactivation being a fault).
It's not only shielding, it's also attracting.;-)
While the ratio might be in favor towards 'shielding', the moon still looks very much the same on both sides.
Only a few days ago I compared the images and videos from the Chinese moon landing to the old Apollo videos and pictures.
The Chinese pictures show a moon like it’s supposed to look. The surface appears as if somebody fired buckshot into it. This is what you would expect. Tiny meteoroids are hitting the moon each day and those "hits" never go away as there’s no such thing as wind.
When you look at the scenes where the "astronauts" walk around on the moon, it appears to be very different. They are missing the "buckshot", but have many little pebbles lying around everywhere. This doesn’t make sense.
There’re many other anomalies in the Apollo material, but this one is obvious to everyone having a working pair of eyes.
These clowns are part of what your "secret services" do. They attempt to create fake masses echoing their catch phrases, while discouraging honest people to get into it (flooding with lotsa shit, etc.).
So the guys having fun killing civilians (including a Reuters reporter) from an Apache helicopter committed no crime? Have you ever thought about adding a swastika as 51st star? Truth in labelling and all...;-P
Intel first premiered their ad campaign featuring them in a tv commercial where in a microprocessor fabrication lab the technicians are wearing suits which they use in the dust-free environment. Suddenly a technician pops in a sleek new state-of-the-art Pentium II microchip and the computers come alive with music and videos, while the 'bunnies' start breakdancing in space suits.
Why are they called bunnies? It's the name of the ad, plus Intel's new models. Thus Intel's huge ad campaign began, including 2 tv spots for the Super bowl.
Intel Reveals 10nm Sunny Cove CPU Cores That Go Deeper, Wider, and Faster
And with every bug mitigation it keeps getting slower, while remaining vulnerable (as the hardware is broken).
Intel does the benchmarks without mitigations. How charming.
Now you know what the bunny commercial really meant: They're fucking you over and over and over and over...
This is a 1+3+4 design, as opposed to the traditional 4+4.
There’s 512kb L2 cache on the big core, while there’s “only” 256kb on each of the three middle cores, and 128kb for each of the four small cores.
On Android, most applications run multiple threads. In other words: This is going to suck and every other chip manufacturer could easily pull the same stunt (which I hope, they won’t).
Intel has always been fighting dirty. They are with the mob (three letter agencies). Hence, they usually get away with everything.
The only thing that surprises me is that people can still be surprised by Intel cheating.
No, it doesn't imply that. It just states that this can be dangerous and result in fatalities. The DLRG stepped up to have their warning made public. This is the intention.;-)
Slashdot Mirror
Unfortunately, Tesla is a private company. They need every cent, which means that they cannot afford to kick their customers. Not even if they deserve it.
This is one of the many reasons, why private companies can't regulate these sort of things.
It did so, simply because there wasn't anything in front of it but open space. Can you see the difference to a car?
Only if it brings the car to a halt safely. Driving on while you are sleeping is a no go. We've seen Teslas killing their drivers and innocent people. They simply are nowhere near autonomous driving. Nobody is, not even Google. ;-)
Nonetheless, it should detect when the driver isn't participating (sleeping, having a seizure) and bring the car to halt in a controlled manner + safe position (right side). It should also call an ambulance (driver pays it all).
Luxury cars always have a lower accident rate.
Now did they - or did they not - implement a technology to check if there is a driver for their non-autopilot "autopilots"?
Isn’t the technology supposed to detect that a driver is "non-responsive" and bring the car to a halt in a controlled manner? Those idiots should not be seen cruising around; they should be parked at the right side, call for emergency already sent (they’d then have to pay for their "nap").
This is Tesla’s fault. Either they have no such detection or it’s broken (deactivation being a fault).
It's not only shielding, it's also attracting. ;-)
While the ratio might be in favor towards 'shielding', the moon still looks very much the same on both sides.
Only a few days ago I compared the images and videos from the Chinese moon landing to the old Apollo videos and pictures.
The Chinese pictures show a moon like it’s supposed to look. The surface appears as if somebody fired buckshot into it. This is what you would expect. Tiny meteoroids are hitting the moon each day and those "hits" never go away as there’s no such thing as wind.
When you look at the scenes where the "astronauts" walk around on the moon, it appears to be very different. They are missing the "buckshot", but have many little pebbles lying around everywhere. This doesn’t make sense.
There’re many other anomalies in the Apollo material, but this one is obvious to everyone having a working pair of eyes.
These clowns are part of what your "secret services" do. They attempt to create fake masses echoing their catch phrases, while discouraging honest people to get into it (flooding with lotsa shit, etc.).
No, they didn't. They HELPED him with those atrocities. They "removed" him after he refused to attack Iran any further.
Ehrm? Know your history dude. It was the US backing Saddam Hussein when he committed all those crimes (including gas attacks).
By now, can't we just call him Elon Kardashian?
So the guys having fun killing civilians (including a Reuters reporter) from an Apache helicopter committed no crime? Have you ever thought about adding a swastika as 51st star? Truth in labelling and all... ;-P
Intel first premiered their ad campaign featuring them in a tv commercial where in a microprocessor fabrication lab the technicians are wearing suits which they use in the dust-free environment. Suddenly a technician pops in a sleek new state-of-the-art Pentium II microchip and the computers come alive with music and videos, while the 'bunnies' start breakdancing in space suits.
Why are they called bunnies? It's the name of the ad, plus Intel's new models. Thus Intel's huge ad campaign began, including 2 tv spots for the Super bowl.
I was being sarcastic. THEY are fucking us over.
Intel Reveals 10nm Sunny Cove CPU Cores That Go Deeper, Wider, and Faster
And with every bug mitigation it keeps getting slower, while remaining vulnerable (as the hardware is broken).
Intel does the benchmarks without mitigations. How charming.
Now you know what the bunny commercial really meant: They're fucking you over and over and over and over...
I’m somewhat appalled to see the press “hyping” a processor, which has been clearly optimized for benchmarks.
The Snapdragon 855 features eight cores (standard), with only one of them delivering full performance:
1x 2.84GHz (Cortex A76)
3x 2.42GHz (Cortex A76)
4x 1.8GHz (Cortex-A55)
This is a 1+3+4 design, as opposed to the traditional 4+4.
There’s 512kb L2 cache on the big core, while there’s “only” 256kb on each of the three middle cores, and 128kb for each of the four small cores.
On Android, most applications run multiple threads. In other words: This is going to suck and every other chip manufacturer could easily pull the same stunt (which I hope, they won’t).
Boo!
Should they manage to spot any stars from there, somebody's gonna be in deep shit. ;-)
Air pollution sounds so passive. Why don't we call them 'exhausts'?
Sorry, but I don't want that ME or something alike. I'm not that dumb a device.
Intel has always been fighting dirty. They are with the mob (three letter agencies). Hence, they usually get away with everything.
The only thing that surprises me is that people can still be surprised by Intel cheating.
No, it doesn't imply that. It just states that this can be dangerous and result in fatalities. The DLRG stepped up to have their warning made public. This is the intention. ;-)
You may try again.
Just fuck off you troll.
Is your German that rusty? You can't even find the nose in front of your eyes?!?
Smartphone statt Kinder - Bademeister beklagen nachlässige Eltern
Great, you're pulling out a different topic as proof? *lol* FO