802.11b runs in 2.4ghz, 802.11a is at 5.5ghz, and you shouldnt have any crosstalk if you set it up right, i know, ive deployed 802.11b in several cities in the midwest that are city wide. Aironet (Now cisco) was one of the first that i know of to accomplish it in austin tx (every mile or so, they have a tower with a br500 bridge for emergency services). Theres 3 non-overlaping bands in 802.11b, stratigicly placed, you will never have one channel interfeer with another.
Re:Yet another good reason to use IP Tables....
on
RIAA to DoS Pirates?
·
· Score: 1
Theres just one problem with this, by the time the packet hits your firewall and the firewall discards it, it has allready passed your router, effectivly taking all your bandwidth before you can do anything about it. The only solution to this would be to get a hold of your provider and put a acl in your edge router (Eg. there router on there bandwidth) that way all the packets are discarded before traveling down YOUR pipe.
And just to point this out, wouldnt all text be backwords unless you provided some sort of mirror system?? I remember in the old projection systes that used lenses had huge mirrors inside just to reverse the image.
I have personally run 802.11b on a single hop at 7mi with 2 yagies, and over 25mi on a dish (but i do have to admit it was on 100 ft tower). Allthough i have not tried it, I could probably get that easily with 802.11a. It is just a matter of the gain and your intended line of site.
Ive got multitudes of sites that would help you out, john fines home page is a good start, vnutz bootloader tutorial is another good place. Do a search on google. But if you dont know how to program very well your not going to get very far. At the very minimum your going to have to know asm, the more the better actually, and a very good understanding of C. From there you will have to learn about the computer from a hardware point of view, especially the BIOS services and related tables. I started writing my OS, finnished the bootloader, then the kernel loader which swithced to 32 bit mode and part of the kernel, but thats as far as i got, i will probably get back to development on it, need to finish out my memory management and driver module routines, then write a few drivers and a gui lib. then i can write a shell and it will finaly do something!!! By the way i say this to prove a point, there is a LOT of code involved just to get a modern OS to the point where i can start to be used. I wish you luck and mabey in 5 to 10 years when you get it finished i can read it on slashdot;9
OK this is what i forsee happening with all these playback formats that the music industry is forcing on its buyers. People are going to eventually get fed up and quit buig their cd's, bands will go to other record labels (or start their own.. its cheap enough to stamp out your own cd's) and sell them online, DIRECT, without the publishers taking 50% (or more) of the profits and to get their album made without these restrictions. I for one wont by something to listen to, that potentially wont allow me to listen to it (eg. those protected cd's that wont play in cd players).... kindof defeats the purpose of buying it in the first place dont you think;9
Why the hell would you want to buy one when you can build a mp3 player that could match feature for feature and then some. Get a SBC (Single board computer) and a 5 in lcd, mpeg123, and create a small linux distro with samba. Put a WiFi card in it, plug it in the aux port of your head unit, and upload your songs from the comfort of your own computer chair.
Has anyone done a study of the bugs:code size:price point correlation??? It seems as the size of their OS increases, so do the bugs (features) and so does the price? Mabey were paying extra for these "features" and not the OS itself;9
I agree. If you encrypt the data multiple times with different crypto standards, e.g. pgp encrypt, then bitshift, then rc5, then byteshift, then blowfish, then resort, then triple DES. If the ppl trying to unencrypt the data didnt know the process to encrypt it, then it would be at least an order of magnitude harder to unencrypt;9
Slashdot Mirror
802.11b runs in 2.4ghz, 802.11a is at 5.5ghz, and you shouldnt have any crosstalk if you set it up right, i know, ive deployed 802.11b in several cities in the midwest that are city wide. Aironet (Now cisco) was one of the first that i know of to accomplish it in austin tx (every mile or so, they have a tower with a br500 bridge for emergency services). Theres 3 non-overlaping bands in 802.11b, stratigicly placed, you will never have one channel interfeer with another.
Theres just one problem with this, by the time the packet hits your firewall and the firewall discards it, it has allready passed your router, effectivly taking all your bandwidth before you can do anything about it. The only solution to this would be to get a hold of your provider and put a acl in your edge router (Eg. there router on there bandwidth) that way all the packets are discarded before traveling down YOUR pipe.
And just to point this out, wouldnt all text be backwords unless you provided some sort of mirror system?? I remember in the old projection systes that used lenses had huge mirrors inside just to reverse the image.
I have personally run 802.11b on a single hop at 7mi with 2 yagies, and over 25mi on a dish (but i do have to admit it was on 100 ft tower). Allthough i have not tried it, I could probably get that easily with 802.11a. It is just a matter of the gain and your intended line of site.
Ive got multitudes of sites that would help you out, john fines home page is a good start, vnutz bootloader tutorial is another good place. Do a search on google. But if you dont know how to program very well your not going to get very far. At the very minimum your going to have to know asm, the more the better actually, and a very good understanding of C. From there you will have to learn about the computer from a hardware point of view, especially the BIOS services and related tables. I started writing my OS, finnished the bootloader, then the kernel loader which swithced to 32 bit mode and part of the kernel, but thats as far as i got, i will probably get back to development on it, need to finish out my memory management and driver module routines, then write a few drivers and a gui lib. then i can write a shell and it will finaly do something!!! By the way i say this to prove a point, there is a LOT of code involved just to get a modern OS to the point where i can start to be used. I wish you luck and mabey in 5 to 10 years when you get it finished i can read it on slashdot ;9
OK this is what i forsee happening with all these playback formats that the music industry is forcing on its buyers. People are going to eventually get fed up and quit buig their cd's, bands will go to other record labels (or start their own.. its cheap enough to stamp out your own cd's) and sell them online, DIRECT, without the publishers taking 50% (or more) of the profits and to get their album made without these restrictions. I for one wont by something to listen to, that potentially wont allow me to listen to it (eg. those protected cd's that wont play in cd players).... kindof defeats the purpose of buying it in the first place dont you think ;9
Why the hell would you want to buy one when you can build a mp3 player that could match feature for feature and then some. Get a SBC (Single board computer) and a 5 in lcd, mpeg123, and create a small linux distro with samba. Put a WiFi card in it, plug it in the aux port of your head unit, and upload your songs from the comfort of your own computer chair.
Has anyone done a study of the bugs:code size:price point correlation??? It seems as the size of their OS increases, so do the bugs (features) and so does the price? Mabey were paying extra for these "features" and not the OS itself ;9
I agree. If you encrypt the data multiple times with different crypto standards, e.g. pgp encrypt, then bitshift, then rc5, then byteshift, then blowfish, then resort, then triple DES. If the ppl trying to unencrypt the data didnt know the process to encrypt it, then it would be at least an order of magnitude harder to unencrypt ;9