I only wear clothes under threat of imprisonment and violence. I am prevented from taking a dump in the street by jack booted thugs. (Libertarian world)
If he controls the network a tap would work, you can intercept the SSL certs and replace them. If you have inserted your own CA into each machine you could even avoid any warning for the end users.
I do most of what you are inquiring about with a linux computer that has 2 NIC's. I have a custom build on openSUSE called net-tap. With a large hard drive, you can perform a tcp dump in a rolling manner, so the oldest is overwritten by the newest. You need to break the dump into reasonably sized bits and you will probably need to do a good bit of manual analysis.
That is the technical side. Now, ethically, this is a bad idea. I capture packets for clients all the time, but my analysis is only concerned with network performance. I can see scenarios where this would be acceptable, but they are few and far between.
I also concur that you are in over your head. People like you are pricing people like me out of the market. You don't know what your doing, but your clients have no idea.
"If your think a professional is expensive (me), you should try hiring an amateur (you)", is meant to be sarcastic, not instructive.
These are Amazon jobs. Their warehouses in Indiana have ridiculous turnover and are constantly hiring (temp only). I've heard nothing but bad things about the working conditions. Those cheap Amazon prices have a heavy cost to the underpaid workers.
I've heard this alot lately, "check people like the Israeli's do". Do people really think you should have a intensive background search just to travel? Have we fallen that far? I think a metel detector and an alert populace will prevent over 99.999 percent of problems. That last.001 percent is not worth my freedom.
You are obviously not a student of history, and "Rich Man" is just a shorthand notation, not a commentary on the evils of money. Were WW1 and WW2 beneficial to all of Europe, or were there afew higher up's who would have benefited if they won? How about the Napoleonic wars, those are named after one guy because....?
Of course the don't willing die for a rich person's ideas. They don't even know it. They get caught up in nationalism or idealistic thinking. Meanwhile, behind the scenes some comfortable, well off, "rich person" is pulling the strings.
Protect your family, yourself, and your home. Don't let someone talk you into putting all those things into danger for their financial benefit.
If Afghan fighters kill an American soldier, we don't round up random hostages and execute them if the killer is not turned in to us. It might not win hearts and minds, but it was a common and fairly effective tactic during both world wars. I think the ability for these acts to be transmitted to the world almost instantly has cut down on them.
American's, and I include myself, have no way to comprehend what living in a war zone would be like. The majority of people would be happy for peace at any cost. In reality, war is usually about ideals, the day to day lives of the majority of people are unaffected by outcome. Unfortunately, there are always people willing to die for some rich guys ideas. Even more unfortunate is that they prefer killing for his ideas.
Dude!
Have you even seen Independence Day? Old movie, but plausible scenario. You think the Aztecs were expecting invaders with overwhelming technological advantages to come sailing out of the ocean?
That's a good point, a computer targeting and firing a suitable rail-gun would be devastating to any aircraft in range. The question is how fast it could fire.
Slashdot Mirror
Dream big.
Dad?
All share should have voting rights. There should be more benefits to ownership then management. Our capitol has been hijacked.
you misspelled Moron's
I only wear clothes under threat of imprisonment and violence. I am prevented from taking a dump in the street by jack booted thugs. (Libertarian world)
I concur and will happily spend 5 to 10 billable hours discussing this with your client.
If he controls the network a tap would work, you can intercept the SSL certs and replace them. If you have inserted your own CA into each machine you could even avoid any warning for the end users.
I do most of what you are inquiring about with a linux computer that has 2 NIC's. I have a custom build on openSUSE called net-tap. With a large hard drive, you can perform a tcp dump in a rolling manner, so the oldest is overwritten by the newest. You need to break the dump into reasonably sized bits and you will probably need to do a good bit of manual analysis.
That is the technical side. Now, ethically, this is a bad idea. I capture packets for clients all the time, but my analysis is only concerned with network performance. I can see scenarios where this would be acceptable, but they are few and far between.
I also concur that you are in over your head. People like you are pricing people like me out of the market. You don't know what your doing, but your clients have no idea.
"If your think a professional is expensive (me), you should try hiring an amateur (you)", is meant to be sarcastic, not instructive.
From all of slashdot (and 4chan): Please post a phone number!
SSL proxy's also don't route DNS queries. So, if DNS is being relayed by the router, he can get alot of information there.
These are Amazon jobs. Their warehouses in Indiana have ridiculous turnover and are constantly hiring (temp only). I've heard nothing but bad things about the working conditions. Those cheap Amazon prices have a heavy cost to the underpaid workers.
rooted my bionic with a simple script, works great.
The droid bionic also fits the majority of your requested features. Lapdock seems pretty awesome too.
I've heard this alot lately, "check people like the Israeli's do". Do people really think you should have a intensive background search just to travel? Have we fallen that far? I think a metel detector and an alert populace will prevent over 99.999 percent of problems. That last .001 percent is not worth my freedom.
ITT tech has a bit of grade inflation. (ITT tech grad!)
yes, many people work hard with no income.
You are obviously not a student of history, and "Rich Man" is just a shorthand notation, not a commentary on the evils of money. Were WW1 and WW2 beneficial to all of Europe, or were there afew higher up's who would have benefited if they won? How about the Napoleonic wars, those are named after one guy because....?
Of course the don't willing die for a rich person's ideas. They don't even know it. They get caught up in nationalism or idealistic thinking. Meanwhile, behind the scenes some comfortable, well off, "rich person" is pulling the strings.
Protect your family, yourself, and your home. Don't let someone talk you into putting all those things into danger for their financial benefit.
Those are still controlled by people, they are not independent hunter killers.
If Afghan fighters kill an American soldier, we don't round up random hostages and execute them if the killer is not turned in to us. It might not win hearts and minds, but it was a common and fairly effective tactic during both world wars. I think the ability for these acts to be transmitted to the world almost instantly has cut down on them.
American's, and I include myself, have no way to comprehend what living in a war zone would be like. The majority of people would be happy for peace at any cost. In reality, war is usually about ideals, the day to day lives of the majority of people are unaffected by outcome. Unfortunately, there are always people willing to die for some rich guys ideas. Even more unfortunate is that they prefer killing for his ideas.
Dude!
Have you even seen Independence Day? Old movie, but plausible scenario. You think the Aztecs were expecting invaders with overwhelming technological advantages to come sailing out of the ocean?
That's a good point, a computer targeting and firing a suitable rail-gun would be devastating to any aircraft in range. The question is how fast it could fire.
An AI that can compete with a human in any sort of non-specific task is far, far in the future. It may never be attained.
I think the ability to field manned air power could be the deciding factor in a future air engagement. Any communications can be cut or intercepted.
I'm going to leave this historical lesson here in the hope it educates someone;
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dreadnought#Anglo-German_arms_race
If we don't stay far enough ahead we risk a race of our own, that will really burn money fast.