Do you really see LINQ, or do you see lambdas and extension methods? LINQ is the query DSL, lambdas are a more syntax-friendly anonymous method, and extension methods make it much more convenient to put this all together.
I look at a lot of code, and LOTS of it uses at least.NET 3.5 features, including a -lot- of lambdas and a -lot- of extension methods. I RARELY see any LINQ, though.
It's funny, because Agile says that standups aren't for the PM, they're for the team members. Except that we all know that in reality, they're so the PM can micromanage.
Continuous integration, while possibly central to "agile" development, is not a feature of "agile" development. Teams using waterfall methodology can use CI just like teams using any other (or no) methodology.
Yes. It even comes with something like 150 aliases predefined. Including ls (get-childitem), mv (move-item), cp (copy-item), and lots of others you'd expect if you're familiar with Linux.
Of course. But if I'm going to use an antenna, then what the fuck would I be paying the cable company for?!
Indeed. I stopped paying them a couple years ago. Antenna for up-to-date local channels (where nearly everything I want to watch is), Netflix for the rest. HBO Now is tempting, though. I might look into it.
I can subscribe to a lot of VOD services, as well as buy many BD movies for the price I was paying for my television before.
Y'know, there's this impressive upsampling technology known as an "antenna". It converts your horrible-quality cable-delivered local channels to crisp, clear, 1080i.
Add an HDHomerun, a Raspberry Pi 2, MythTV (or TVHeadend or whatever...) and Kodi, and you're all set.
Just so we're all on the same page here regarding numbers:
The SSME (Space Shuttle Main Engine) high presssure oxidizer turbopump produces 23,260 horsepower. The high pressure fuel turbopump produces 71,147 horsepower. That's just over 70 MEGAWATTS. There are also low-pressure turbopumps in play, and there were three of them per shuttle.
The Rocketdyne F-1 (Saturn V main engine) turbopump produced 41 megawatts. There were 5 in the first stage.
Ted Stevens. If I remember correctly, he even said out loud that since Alaska hadn't been a state as long as the others, they were behind and needed to catch up on the federal dollars. In essence, the rest of us OWE Alaska because they are a newer state.
C# running on a 168MHz Cortex-M4 with 1MB of flash and 192KB of RAM. This particular "module" replaces the older one that used a 72MHz ARM7 with 512KB of flash and 64KB of RAM.
I see it as the evidence of the end of Java. Oracle sees Java as a vehicle for affiliate link clicks and adware kickbacks. It's more than a little sad.
That's why everyone who works on Mono should be so excited about the.NET Core announcement. They still won't have WPF (but who wants that), and I doubt WF will be a part of it, but they'll have a lot more than they do now.
.NET places no requirements on MSSQL. Me personally, I store my data in a mix of MSSQL. Postgres, SQLite, Cassandra, Lucene (the Java version), and yes, even Firebird (and I absolutely do NOT recommend Firebird).
If you want to host ASP.NET code on Linux, there are various ways to host Mono's version, using Apache, Nginx, and other servers: http://www.mono-project.com/do...
Once.NET Core actually exists, we'll see what the hosting story looks like. I imagine it'll look a lot like Mono's.
So a no-name CEO of a tiny little startup (who doesn't know the difference between a platform and a language) doesn't hire.NET programmers, and that means.NET is dying and Java will rule the world?
Slashdot Mirror
Do you really see LINQ, or do you see lambdas and extension methods? LINQ is the query DSL, lambdas are a more syntax-friendly anonymous method, and extension methods make it much more convenient to put this all together.
I look at a lot of code, and LOTS of it uses at least .NET 3.5 features, including a -lot- of lambdas and a -lot- of extension methods. I RARELY see any LINQ, though.
Save development time by not designing the whole system up front...just tack each little feature on one at a time.
That's not agile, that's test driven development.
It's funny, because Agile says that standups aren't for the PM, they're for the team members. Except that we all know that in reality, they're so the PM can micromanage.
Plus, then you get to do "scrum of scrums"! It's fantastic!
Continuous integration, while possibly central to "agile" development, is not a feature of "agile" development. Teams using waterfall methodology can use CI just like teams using any other (or no) methodology.
The noble unions involved in education in the USA would never allow wasteful spending in the public school system.
Yeah, I agree on the argument syntax. They should've picked Linux style arguments, given they're wider spread.
Either way, though, if you're on Windows, it's your best option. Cygwin sucks.
Yes. It even comes with something like 150 aliases predefined. Including ls (get-childitem), mv (move-item), cp (copy-item), and lots of others you'd expect if you're familiar with Linux.
Of course. But if I'm going to use an antenna, then what the fuck would I be paying the cable company for?!
Indeed. I stopped paying them a couple years ago. Antenna for up-to-date local channels (where nearly everything I want to watch is), Netflix for the rest. HBO Now is tempting, though. I might look into it.
I can subscribe to a lot of VOD services, as well as buy many BD movies for the price I was paying for my television before.
Y'know, there's this impressive upsampling technology known as an "antenna". It converts your horrible-quality cable-delivered local channels to crisp, clear, 1080i.
Add an HDHomerun, a Raspberry Pi 2, MythTV (or TVHeadend or whatever...) and Kodi, and you're all set.
Just so we're all on the same page here regarding numbers:
The SSME (Space Shuttle Main Engine) high presssure oxidizer turbopump produces 23,260 horsepower. The high pressure fuel turbopump produces 71,147 horsepower. That's just over 70 MEGAWATTS. There are also low-pressure turbopumps in play, and there were three of them per shuttle.
The Rocketdyne F-1 (Saturn V main engine) turbopump produced 41 megawatts. There were 5 in the first stage.
Still wonder why we don't use electric pumps?
This is in support of CoreCLR, the version of .NET without any Windows dependencies (or that's the plan, anyway, they're not there yet, I don't think).
.NET isn't an interpreted-bytecode runtime. It never has been. It's always been JIT compiled. Always.
It's really no less safe than anywhere else. Planes don't explode when holes get poked in them, and passengers don't get sucked through said holes.
Ted Stevens. If I remember correctly, he even said out loud that since Alaska hadn't been a state as long as the others, they were behind and needed to catch up on the federal dollars. In essence, the rest of us OWE Alaska because they are a newer state.
Such as? Have you specifically come across something that didn't work?
But then someone would bitch about how .NET isn't portable because it's focused on Windows-specific things like changing the desktop wallpaper.
I'm not really "in the know", but last I heard, Upstart was mostly a giant mess that didn't really work. Is that incorrect?
Personally, I found it kinda, well, comprehensible, unlike init.
The operating system doesn't hide extensions, the graphical shell does. Unless you configure it not to.
https://www.ghielectronics.com...
C# running on a 168MHz Cortex-M4 with 1MB of flash and 192KB of RAM. This particular "module" replaces the older one that used a 72MHz ARM7 with 512KB of flash and 64KB of RAM.
Think smaller.
I see it as the evidence of the end of Java. Oracle sees Java as a vehicle for affiliate link clicks and adware kickbacks. It's more than a little sad.
Yeah. If only the UI paradigm for "modern" apps didn't suck.
That's why everyone who works on Mono should be so excited about the .NET Core announcement. They still won't have WPF (but who wants that), and I doubt WF will be a part of it, but they'll have a lot more than they do now.
.NET places no requirements on MSSQL. Me personally, I store my data in a mix of MSSQL. Postgres, SQLite, Cassandra, Lucene (the Java version), and yes, even Firebird (and I absolutely do NOT recommend Firebird).
If you want to host ASP.NET code on Linux, there are various ways to host Mono's version, using Apache, Nginx, and other servers: http://www.mono-project.com/do...
Once .NET Core actually exists, we'll see what the hosting story looks like. I imagine it'll look a lot like Mono's.
So a no-name CEO of a tiny little startup (who doesn't know the difference between a platform and a language) doesn't hire .NET programmers, and that means .NET is dying and Java will rule the world?
Tee hee. Keep posting, I'm enjoying it.