While Gnome is defaulted to average Joe User, KDE is more tweaked to 3773t with all those buttons up and down and all menu functions. That's the reason why I don't wanna use KDE. The most dumbed down interface I ever used was MacOS, and it was quite usable.
What percent of windows users use the accessibility features ?
Ever questioned their quality maybe?
How does this make KDE any more useful to us , who don't really need accessibility. Making KDE more accessible to physically handicapped people is sure nice and appriciable, but shouldn't it come down the list of things like
Yep, let's ignore them. Nicer icons should get in the first plan.
Your comment made me feel that you're mentaly handicapped, and you deserve some special atk settings for brain damaged people
They will adopt desktop settings at freedesktop.org too and there will be one control panel to maintain both KDE and Gnome. Until then I'll be avoiding KDE.
They tracked SCO was sending OUT X million responses to DoS attack. They should track packages that go IN too. Or,... they were originating from inside and faking outside which is not hard to do???
Please somebody start a site with HOWTO - SYN PROTECTION FOR SCO or HOWTO MAKE A SIMPLE FIREWALL
In a well-run shop, a good PM is worth a dozen engineers, never mind coders.
True and false. Most important factor of that is what kind of project is the project and if Manager is involved in its construction in global or bysiders point.
Example for more than one company: Accounting software, if manager is not the one that decides what DB, what tables and refferences (with this I mean that he only relays data to coders and discovery is up to them, and either that manager sucks or he isn't manager that would be better than coders in any view), well he's not Manager, he's economist that instructs coders with the rules of the game.
What you forget is that mostly manager is just a job coorinator, and not software designer, which in my viewpoint is the most decisive job if you look from this view.
Thanks, I really missed it, but now I understand Darls world completely. He's an idiot (like I didn't know that before).
But I guess I should put my dreams about my personal Atom bomb away for a few years, until Darl proclaims Army invalid and sues the last earth particle that haven't yet being sued by Darl and proclaimed his. Well, it was a nice dream though.
Darl is saying that all rights for non profit are disabled.
Does that mean that anyone can:
1. go to Pentagon and take one Atom bomb. If I remember correctly they are illegaly competing as non-profit organization with profit weapon traders, thus destroying their bussines? 2. Go to university where students papers are disposed for viewing and proclaim them as mine since they are non-profit users 3. Basicaly take anything what non-profit users have done, since I own a company?
Still, Novell is Novell. As far as I suspect they will provide very (console) similiar interface for Linux Novell services. So one for few underlaying platforms is suitable.
They should just make it hard so not anyone but knowledgeable can do it. Or everybody should start having X certified Genius exams to separate better from common, but I guess not even one company has some interest in doing that.
If this one is high level enough, then it might be good. Problem of all exams is that they aren't hard enough and practically anybody can pass them
I went to RHCE, but I was really dissapointed with low level of knowledge to pass the exam. My M$ exams (fact for anybody who wants to pass them: just think commercialy M$ positive and you'll pass, absolute no knowledge needed just economical common sense) are pure need and if it is possible I rather shut up than say that I have them. Unfortunate that's a bussiness must have for me.
I don't know now, but there were the times when I wanted to use my Sigma DVD card under Linux. And they provide shit. The least to comply with GPL would be releasing the drivers for their cards for Linux.
Offtopic? C'mon/., SCO has proven that contributing to kernel and forgeting can be done. It has also proven that not knowing what GPL is after distributing it.
So why would this new specification of kernel inspection and maintenance do any good against some SCO that just doesn't want to remember.
Yeah, you'd better make a landing area in the backyard, and that should be with all lights even including flashy green ones and those which change color.
p.s. Do not forget about hot-dog stand, who knows it might even be an attraction and youmight even make profit
Simple steps of this bussines plan: 1. Asteroid lands in your backyard 2. hot-dog stand has being prepared 3. PROFIT
yep, basically if Linux isn't Slackware describe all external weakpoints, if it is Slackware describe every theme just to get more favorable text. Well, it's easy to describe weak points against better, just to get another viewpoint that messes up facts
I mean if someone is doing detailed distribution evaluation about system internals (like compiling and samba settings), that one should be at least computer literate.
I already given up on one, mostly because WIndows were slow as hell and mainly unusable for my needs. So far my notebook serves me just OK.
If I would really need that badly I would probably buy my self palm or visor, both have decent support for what I asked, but I fancy Linux and Linux it will be.
Reason: Thing that I would need beside decent ssh terminal access would be some monitoring deamons of mine which could be easily ported on any Linux environment, so I guess this takes PocketLinux in account too.
For me not having this option is not a bug, but having would be a feature
p.s. I don't mind spending up to 600$ if the thing is working as I need and as I want, so... I don't want Windows. I'm already forced to use them for some other jobs, which I haven't yet succed to move to Linux. And the fact that I still depend on my two G4s (for now, but number goes down with every year, and if Codewavers Office will prove it self as decent replacement there they go both of them, with one way ticket to trash) is bugging me too
Does anybody know or has experience with iPAQ and Linux, I'm thinking about buying one, but I don't know one thing.
Does iPAQ with Linux supports GSM phone card (read as accesory drivers), so I could be able to access my servers trough ssh from anywhere? If yes, then which model and which accesory.
Yes, I know that Windows do support that on iPAQ, but I really hate Windows too much, it's not an option, I'm not in suicidal mode.
Slashdot Mirror
My bad! Sorry kcontrol yes.
As for modular, probably yes, but usable and nice, NO. kcontrol is the main reason I left for Gnome
(different focus)? I must agree to that
While Gnome is defaulted to average Joe User, KDE is more tweaked to 3773t with all those buttons up and down and all menu functions. That's the reason why I don't wanna use KDE. The most dumbed down interface I ever used was MacOS, and it was quite usable.
GConf is XML architecture, KConfig is a software.
And if you ask me KConfig is already a huge monolithic app that is hideous
What percent of windows users use the accessibility features ?
Ever questioned their quality maybe?
How does this make KDE any more useful to us , who don't really need accessibility. Making KDE more accessible to physically handicapped people is sure nice and appriciable, but shouldn't it come down the list of things like
Yep, let's ignore them. Nicer icons should get in the first plan.
Your comment made me feel that you're mentaly handicapped, and you deserve some special atk settings for brain damaged people
They will adopt desktop settings at freedesktop.org too and there will be one control panel to maintain both KDE and Gnome. Until then I'll be avoiding KDE.
I just don't want to tweak every single feature
Actualy, what bothers me is:
They tracked SCO was sending OUT X million responses to DoS attack. They should track packages that go IN too. Or,... they were originating from inside and faking outside which is not hard to do???
Please somebody start a site with HOWTO - SYN PROTECTION FOR SCO or HOWTO MAKE A SIMPLE FIREWALL
5. They simulated DoS the easiest way and unplugged electricity from servers:)
In a well-run shop, a good PM is worth a dozen engineers, never mind coders.
True and false. Most important factor of that is what kind of project is the project and if Manager is involved in its construction in global or bysiders point.
Example for more than one company: Accounting software, if manager is not the one that decides what DB, what tables and refferences (with this I mean that he only relays data to coders and discovery is up to them, and either that manager sucks or he isn't manager that would be better than coders in any view), well he's not Manager, he's economist that instructs coders with the rules of the game.
What you forget is that mostly manager is just a job coorinator, and not software designer, which in my viewpoint is the most decisive job if you look from this view.
Thanks, I really missed it, but now I understand Darls world completely. He's an idiot (like I didn't know that before).
But I guess I should put my dreams about my personal Atom bomb away for a few years, until Darl proclaims Army invalid and sues the last earth particle that haven't yet being sued by Darl and proclaimed his. Well, it was a nice dream though.
Darl is saying that all rights for non profit are disabled.
Does that mean that anyone can:
1. go to Pentagon and take one Atom bomb. If I remember correctly they are illegaly competing as non-profit organization with profit weapon traders, thus destroying their bussines?
2. Go to university where students papers are disposed for viewing and proclaim them as mine since they are non-profit users
3. Basicaly take anything what non-profit users have done, since I own a company?
Still, Novell is Novell. As far as I suspect they will provide very (console) similiar interface for Linux Novell services. So one for few underlaying platforms is suitable.
They should just make it hard so not anyone but knowledgeable can do it. Or everybody should start having X certified Genius exams to separate better from common, but I guess not even one company has some interest in doing that.
You might be really wrong.
If this one is high level enough, then it might be good. Problem of all exams is that they aren't hard enough and practically anybody can pass them
I went to RHCE, but I was really dissapointed with low level of knowledge to pass the exam. My M$ exams (fact for anybody who wants to pass them: just think commercialy M$ positive and you'll pass, absolute no knowledge needed just economical common sense) are pure need and if it is possible I rather shut up than say that I have them. Unfortunate that's a bussiness must have for me.
I guess you don't understand or you're joking.
I don't know now, but there were the times when I wanted to use my Sigma DVD card under Linux. And they provide shit. The least to comply with GPL would be releasing the drivers for their cards for Linux.
One driver for Sigma chips was made long ago. I wonder if they use that one too. Since Sigma provides shit for Linux
Offtopic? C'mon /., SCO has proven that contributing to kernel and forgeting can be done. It has also proven that not knowing what GPL is after distributing it.
So why would this new specification of kernel inspection and maintenance do any good against some SCO that just doesn't want to remember.
We can still change our mind after contributing.
Hella, mister! GePeeL, wtf is this??
Damn, /. is funny:) I was proclaimed as troll???
/.:)
How someone could troll spammers to get revenge? Well,... post on
Why bother???
If you wanna reply just do it like this:
Hello, I hope you will take your self a minute to read what I wrote:
FUCK YOU AND STARVE TO DEATH
Thanks for your attention
Yeah, you'd better make a landing area in the backyard, and that should be with all lights even including flashy green ones and those which change color.
p.s. Do not forget about hot-dog stand, who knows it might even be an attraction and youmight even make profit
Simple steps of this bussines plan:
1. Asteroid lands in your backyard
2. hot-dog stand has being prepared
3. PROFIT
The real question is whether or not Fedora is going to diverge away from Red Hat, or if it will track RHEL
Fact that Fedoa is RHEL testbed should tell you that you've messed up the facts, RHEL will track Fedora not the opposite
yep, basically if Linux isn't Slackware describe all external weakpoints, if it is Slackware describe every theme just to get more favorable text. Well, it's easy to describe weak points against better, just to get another viewpoint that messes up facts
I mean if someone is doing detailed distribution evaluation about system internals (like compiling and samba settings), that one should be at least computer literate.
being perfectly happy with fedora, (yum and apt rock).
All the things in Eugenia's rantings are already solvedand I have best distro up until now, at least as far as it concerns me.
Anyway still nice that RH is extending support for commercial desktop.
I already given up on one, mostly because WIndows were slow as hell and mainly unusable for my needs. So far my notebook serves me just OK.
If I would really need that badly I would probably buy my self palm or visor, both have decent support for what I asked, but I fancy Linux and Linux it will be.
Reason: Thing that I would need beside decent ssh terminal access would be some monitoring deamons of mine which could be easily ported on any Linux environment, so I guess this takes PocketLinux in account too.
For me not having this option is not a bug, but having would be a feature
p.s. I don't mind spending up to 600$ if the thing is working as I need and as I want, so... I don't want Windows. I'm already forced to use them for some other jobs, which I haven't yet succed to move to Linux. And the fact that I still depend on my two G4s (for now, but number goes down with every year, and if Codewavers Office will prove it self as decent replacement there they go both of them, with one way ticket to trash) is bugging me too
Does anybody know or has experience with iPAQ and Linux, I'm thinking about buying one, but I don't know one thing.
Does iPAQ with Linux supports GSM phone card (read as accesory drivers), so I could be able to access my servers trough ssh from anywhere?
If yes, then which model and which accesory.
Yes, I know that Windows do support that on iPAQ, but I really hate Windows too much, it's not an option, I'm not in suicidal mode.
Naah, it doesn't work! Didn't you see that it runs WinXP??
Sorry, Linux only:)