The review did not look at pesticides or the environmental impact of different farming practices.
My argument was absurd on purpose to clearly show how wanking about "nutritional" value is useless. I don't care which one comes out less toxic. But do the research that answers that question!
This study just showed that Organic food doesn't have significant more nutrients than non-organic.
The review did not look at pesticides or the environmental impact of different farming practices.
I'll modify their quote so it makes sense:
"What it shows is that there is little, if any, nutritional difference between paintball bullets and conventionally bullets and that there is no evidence of additional health benefits from eating paintball bullets."
The review did not look at the impact of being shot with conventional bullets, just the nutritional value.
Really? I can give you two apples that have the same nutritional value but one has cyanide in it. Are you going to trust the study that doesn't look into the affects of poison in the food?
I'm not suggesting racism. I'm suggesting that there are more bullies as cops than good people as cops. (and the good ones start becoming dirty when they cover for the bad ones)
And even if the citizen is being a complete asshole, i DON'T PAY the citizen, i pay the salary of the cop. Part of his pay covers the part that he will have to deal with assholes and not take it personal.
Since they carry GUNS, I am highly critical when they act as bullies.
(when i'm safely on the internet and i know they can't track me down and arrest me on trumped up charges that is)
Are you telling me supergrrl actually wasn't over in Iraq writing about her personal experience with the latest road side bomb? Damn, you're right. You do need a super-power to realize it!!!
Yeah, police should always arrest people that they don't like for disorderly conduct even if the charges won't stick.
The police did act stupidly by harassing someone with the means to legally and politically fight back. Smarter police have been harassing thousands of people a year without coming under scrutiny. He screwed up by being a bully to the wrong person.
Because if it goes down for 2 days you eventually won't get any snmp data from your switch?
1.) Why would people use a lease time of under 1 or 2 days for static infrastructure? (or 7 days even) 2.) Do DHCP failures for more than 24 hours fit into your uptime requirements?
Because mom'n'pop shops need to send you your order information via Vanish? Just think no company in the world that trades on a major stock exchange uses IM, because all of those messages would have to be logged....
Aren't external usb/firewire/esata drives cheaper than $200/500 gig? I think they are around $100, so you get $10 per 50 gig. It's secondary backup while they aren't permanent you can rotate through them and reuse them.
I think he is saying the poster used originality in downloading the individual tiles and reassembling them and he now owns exclusive copyright on the images. It takes a lot of skill to line up the tiles just right and reassemble them.
Amazon is taxed. They aren't getting a free ride. Everyone is already required to pay a sales tax on the items they buy out of state anyway. In your state tax filing it is usually listed under Use tax.
So amazon isn't going to pay any more in tax, the people that are evading taxes would be paying for the tax.
Teaching people that the BMI has its flaws and drawbacks and should be interpreted individually for each person instead of being followed slavishly is good. Purging it with fire and salting the earth so it'll never come back would be overkill, though.
Maybe if they'd stop with the "low fat" nonsense and teach essential fatty acids, i'd agree. But since there are a number of things that do way more harm then good, I say destroy BMI.
There are way better measures and maybe young girls will have less eating disorders if they STOP using weight as their metric. Skinny-fat is as bad as fat-fat.
And you don't have to be in the 0.1% to be outside of your BMI. I'm betting 30% of california is healthy enough to be "overweight". You don't have to be a body builder to be outside your BMI. I would have to lose all of my modest amount of muscle and the last 15% of my fat before being the "correct" BMI.
Why settle for false positives when they have cheap body fat devices? If you want a rough measure, use sex. Pick the sex that has the higher incidence of obesity and then when you see that sex, just categorize them as overweight.
Congrats on finding something that works for you and being concerned about your weight.
First off, i'd say, please be careful how you lose weight. Weight is really only a very rough measure of fitness. You can probably fluctuate by 6-8 pounds just from water weight and salt intake. So don't be discouraged when you see it move up and down by several pounds within a couple of days. Waist measurements, photos, and how your clothes fit are the real measure of progress.
Also, please supplement with a daily vitamin. Losing weight is stressful on the body and if you are eating prepared meals you probably are missing some nutrients.
Any exercise you can do will help you reach your goals too. Even just walking every day.
And here are two tricks for you to not feel as hungry: drink lots of water (i chug a nalgene quart of water), eat smaller meals 5 times a day.
Your body lags between when you eat and when the hungriness goes away. If you wait until you are hungry you will overeat. But if you eat based on the clock, you will be able to eat smaller meals and never get to the point where you want to eat everything in sight.
I was on a modified atkins for 10 weeks eating 65% fat. You'd be surprised how much fat fills you up.
I don't have the citations right now, but i thought that being overfat is correlated with increase chances of adult onset diabetes and all of the associated risks that go with it. (additionally, spiking your insulin with overeating of carbs isn't the best thing)
Along with the effects it has on your triglyceride levels.
I think the main disadvantage to bodybuilding (and living) is the free radicals. Ultra low calorie diets have been shown to extend life. Eventually you will die of cancer if you live long enough. If you can slow down that process you can extend your life. So smaller people that take in less food are probably having less dna damage.
That's not true. You are more likely thinking of powerlifters who don't have a very high BMI because their sport requires them to be strong and light. They get joint wear because they push their bodies to the very limit with weights.
Bodybuilders on the other hand do not need to do extremely heavy weight. Their sport doesn't require them to max out any given weight but to stimulate the most muscle growth. (they might sometimes train like powerlifters, but they don't need to emphasis neuromuscular efficiency as much so they don't often do 1-3 reps)
Resistance training has been shown to increase joint stability, tendon and ligament strength, and bone density. I know you want to hate meatheads, but you're going to have to hate them for something other than bodybuilding.
(you can hope the ones that don't use fake tanners get skin cancer maybe?)
Slashdot Mirror
You are refuting a bunch of things i never said.
Did you see the quote?
My argument was absurd on purpose to clearly show how wanking about "nutritional" value is useless. I don't care which one comes out less toxic. But do the research that answers that question!
Ha. good catch.
This study just showed that Organic food doesn't have significant more nutrients than non-organic.
The review did not look at pesticides or the environmental impact of different farming practices.
I'll modify their quote so it makes sense:
Really? I can give you two apples that have the same nutritional value but one has cyanide in it. Are you going to trust the study that doesn't look into the affects of poison in the food?
I'm not suggesting racism. I'm suggesting that there are more bullies as cops than good people as cops. (and the good ones start becoming dirty when they cover for the bad ones)
And even if the citizen is being a complete asshole, i DON'T PAY the citizen, i pay the salary of the cop. Part of his pay covers the part that he will have to deal with assholes and not take it personal.
Since they carry GUNS, I am highly critical when they act as bullies.
(when i'm safely on the internet and i know they can't track me down and arrest me on trumped up charges that is)
Are you telling me supergrrl actually wasn't over in Iraq writing about her personal experience with the latest road side bomb? Damn, you're right. You do need a super-power to realize it!!!
You make the assumption that there are any professionals to replace.
Yeah, police should always arrest people that they don't like for disorderly conduct even if the charges won't stick.
The police did act stupidly by harassing someone with the means to legally and politically fight back. Smarter police have been harassing thousands of people a year without coming under scrutiny. He screwed up by being a bully to the wrong person.
It's good you never allowed windows network code into your company. You wouldn't want any open source BSD code in your company!
Only a terrorist would know what a terrorist would know...
Longer lease times, perhaps?
Because if it goes down for 2 days you eventually won't get any snmp data from your switch?
1.) Why would people use a lease time of under 1 or 2 days for static infrastructure? (or 7 days even)
2.) Do DHCP failures for more than 24 hours fit into your uptime requirements?
Because mom'n'pop shops need to send you your order information via Vanish? Just think no company in the world that trades on a major stock exchange uses IM, because all of those messages would have to be logged....
Aren't external usb/firewire/esata drives cheaper than $200/500 gig? I think they are around $100, so you get $10 per 50 gig. It's secondary backup while they aren't permanent you can rotate through them and reuse them.
Have a friend buy it for you and gift it to you.
I think he is saying the poster used originality in downloading the individual tiles and reassembling them and he now owns exclusive copyright on the images. It takes a lot of skill to line up the tiles just right and reassemble them.
So if i make a photocopy do i get a copyright or don't i? You've avoided this question. And for a good reason.
So if i pay someone to photocopy the declaration of independence and someone else takes it an uploads it to wikimedia...
How can you call that someone else's work? These are basically photocopies of public domain works.
If you barter you are STILL required to pay tax on the value of the barter. (i don't know the details and have don't know anyone that has done this)
But you can see why they'd do this.
Amazon is taxed. They aren't getting a free ride. Everyone is already required to pay a sales tax on the items they buy out of state anyway. In your state tax filing it is usually listed under Use tax.
So amazon isn't going to pay any more in tax, the people that are evading taxes would be paying for the tax.
Maybe if they'd stop with the "low fat" nonsense and teach essential fatty acids, i'd agree. But since there are a number of things that do way more harm then good, I say destroy BMI.
There are way better measures and maybe young girls will have less eating disorders if they STOP using weight as their metric. Skinny-fat is as bad as fat-fat.
And you don't have to be in the 0.1% to be outside of your BMI. I'm betting 30% of california is healthy enough to be "overweight". You don't have to be a body builder to be outside your BMI. I would have to lose all of my modest amount of muscle and the last 15% of my fat before being the "correct" BMI.
Why settle for false positives when they have cheap body fat devices? If you want a rough measure, use sex. Pick the sex that has the higher incidence of obesity and then when you see that sex, just categorize them as overweight.
The dreaded central adiposity which correlates to heart disease too.
Congrats on finding something that works for you and being concerned about your weight.
First off, i'd say, please be careful how you lose weight. Weight is really only a very rough measure of fitness. You can probably fluctuate by 6-8 pounds just from water weight and salt intake. So don't be discouraged when you see it move up and down by several pounds within a couple of days. Waist measurements, photos, and how your clothes fit are the real measure of progress.
Also, please supplement with a daily vitamin. Losing weight is stressful on the body and if you are eating prepared meals you probably are missing some nutrients.
Any exercise you can do will help you reach your goals too. Even just walking every day.
And here are two tricks for you to not feel as hungry: drink lots of water (i chug a nalgene quart of water), eat smaller meals 5 times a day.
Your body lags between when you eat and when the hungriness goes away. If you wait until you are hungry you will overeat. But if you eat based on the clock, you will be able to eat smaller meals and never get to the point where you want to eat everything in sight.
I was on a modified atkins for 10 weeks eating 65% fat. You'd be surprised how much fat fills you up.
Like the same ones that promoted the "low fat" hysteria for dieting? We should all eat 60-70% carbs so we can spike our insulin and get fat!
I don't have the citations right now, but i thought that being overfat is correlated with increase chances of adult onset diabetes and all of the associated risks that go with it. (additionally, spiking your insulin with overeating of carbs isn't the best thing)
Along with the effects it has on your triglyceride levels.
I think the main disadvantage to bodybuilding (and living) is the free radicals. Ultra low calorie diets have been shown to extend life. Eventually you will die of cancer if you live long enough. If you can slow down that process you can extend your life. So smaller people that take in less food are probably having less dna damage.
That's not true. You are more likely thinking of powerlifters who don't have a very high BMI because their sport requires them to be strong and light. They get joint wear because they push their bodies to the very limit with weights.
Bodybuilders on the other hand do not need to do extremely heavy weight. Their sport doesn't require them to max out any given weight but to stimulate the most muscle growth. (they might sometimes train like powerlifters, but they don't need to emphasis neuromuscular efficiency as much so they don't often do 1-3 reps)
Resistance training has been shown to increase joint stability, tendon and ligament strength, and bone density. I know you want to hate meatheads, but you're going to have to hate them for something other than bodybuilding.
(you can hope the ones that don't use fake tanners get skin cancer maybe?)