Slashdot Mirror


User: Dwonis

Dwonis's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
2,728
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 2,728

  1. Re:More Evidence of the Chilling Effect of the DCM on IEEE Adds DMCA Clause for Submitted Papers · · Score: 1

    It's the DMCA, not the DCMA.

  2. Re:Playing it smart on Apache 2.0 Goes Gold! · · Score: 2

    What happened with Postgres?

  3. Re:netcraft survey on Teoma Aims To Kill Google · · Score: 2

    It's probably so they can allocate resources for the actual search engine, rather than its web frontend. Teenagers familiar with Windows do cost less than Unix admins. You get what you pay for, but that's probably all they need in this case, for now.

  4. Re:Teoma ranking on Teoma Aims To Kill Google · · Score: 2

    They could just be using IIS for the web frontend, since it's probably cheaper to hire a PFY that's familiar with Windows than to hire qualified Unix admins for everything.

  5. Re:Slightly OT: Google and the Google Toolbar for on Teoma Aims To Kill Google · · Score: 2

    Try Protozilla. It basically allows you to (re)define handlers for protocols in the URI. (I used it to redirect mailto: to mutt in an xterm, since muttzilla doesn't work with mozilla).

  6. Re:Where's Teoma's caching? on Teoma Aims To Kill Google · · Score: 3, Informative

    Be patient. Caching takes up a lot of storage, which costs a lot of money, which Teoma doesn't have yet.

  7. Tough shit on Declawing Windows: Impossible? · · Score: 2

    If Microsoft's products are not modular, that's Microsoft's problem. Why should Sun, Netscape, Real, Apple or anyone else suffer because Microsoft can't cope?

  8. Baseless? on Intel Puts The Squeeze On ... A Yoga Foundation? · · Score: 2
    I'm not 100% familiar with U.S. law, but isn't it perfectly legal in the U.S. to have an identical trademark as another entity, as long as you are not competing in the same industry? In other words, wouldn't it be legal for the foundation to call itself "Intel Inside", as long as they are not maufacturing electronics components?

    OTOH, with stuff like the DMCA, I don't know what is legal in the U.S. anymore.

  9. Re:Well then... on The Root of All E-Mail · · Score: 2

    Funny... I know a lot of Canadians and none of them pronounce "about" "aboot".

  10. Re:I'd never trust anyone except Ogg on VP3.com: Future VP3 Releases To Be LGPL · · Score: 2

    Sigh. The open-source community can always fork VP3 and compete with VP5 if they do that. That's the nature of the *GPL.

  11. Re:I'd never trust anyone except Ogg on VP3.com: Future VP3 Releases To Be LGPL · · Score: 1, Offtopic
    Hint: Ogg was originally LGPL, and is now X11 - even *less* GPL (and in Ogg's case, RMS agreed this was a good move, because of the network effect needed to get good Ogg adoption).

    This is what annoys me about the RMS-is-an-irrational-zealot trolls. RMS has proved time and time again to be a reasonable person, but people keep on trolling.

  12. Removing senators? on CBDTPA Finds A Champion In the House · · Score: 2

    I'm not an American, so I don't know, but do you Americans have some way of removing senators from office?

  13. Re:Make it Seamless, Silly. on Can GnuPG Deliver? · · Score: 3, Informative

    Mutt has built-in PGP support. All you have to do is configure it.

  14. Re:Yenc is great! on Usenet Encoding: yEnc · · Score: 2

    That's pure bullshit. Criticism should be welcome in all technical circles. If you don't like criticism, then go do something else.

  15. Re:My favorite (light) setup on Ximian GNOME and "Low-End" Systems · · Score: 2
    Or,

    Extra-fancy web browser: w3m
    Mail Client: cat ~/Maildir/*/* # Of *course* you're using maildir.
    Word Processor: cat >[file] # Much more efficient
    Other Desktop apps: halt -f

  16. Re:Bloat can never be good. on Ximian GNOME and "Low-End" Systems · · Score: 2
    This idea of "optimizing" bad code seems to stem from our universities.

    Ever since they started teaching C++ or Java in introductory courses... Sigh. You can teach calculus before you teach algebra, and some people might survive, but most won't know what's going on.

  17. Re:Bloat can never be good. on Ximian GNOME and "Low-End" Systems · · Score: 2

    Comments like these are what allow people to spread the FUD that "Linux isn't well supported".

  18. Re:Right answer on Ximian GNOME and "Low-End" Systems · · Score: 2
    I still use only Windowmaker even with this 1+ GHz, 512 MB machine and do not intend to switch to KDE or Gnome

    You too? I thought I was the only one!

    I have a similar configuration as you, and I've never understood why someone would pay all the money for a new system, and not want it to run as quickly as possible.

    When KDE/GNOME are (ballpark figure) 30% slower than Window Maker, then they are 30% slower on every machine. That might only translate into a few seconds for some operations, but 30% is still 30%, eh?

  19. Re:By customer demand on Microsoft XP License Prohibits VNC · · Score: 2

    What the focus group didn't realize is that the antipathy was toward having to use a slow GUI-based remote access system at all, rather than just having a half-decent shell.

  20. Re:And this is a problem...why? on Microsoft XP License Prohibits VNC · · Score: 1
    Exactly, and since Remote Desktop is portable to any platform...

    Oh. Nevermind.

  21. This is news? on Crappy Passwords Very Common · · Score: 2

    I thought it was common knowledge among sysadmins that people's passwords WILL suck.

  22. Re:Dude! on Laptop Anti-Theft Devices · · Score: 2
    What do you do for Linux laptops?

    A desktop button that calls cdetach, ssh-add -D, and xscreensaver.

  23. Re:michael: on Laptop Anti-Theft Devices · · Score: 1

    Core memory!

  24. Re:Secure VNC on Perens Discredits Mundie's Attack On GPL · · Score: 2

    VNC sure is slow compared with a text terminal, though. We use TightVNC at work, which helps, but it's still a long shot.

  25. Re:there's always a deal to be found... on Low-end Laptops? · · Score: 1

    Argh!

    s/your/you are/

    s/you are/you're/