Slashdot Mirror


User: demonlapin

demonlapin's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
5,680
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 5,680

  1. Re:Good on SFPD Breathalyzer Mistake Puts Hundreds of DUI Convictions In Doubt · · Score: 1

    If the facts are as you present them, and someone was fired for a medical condition that did not affect their ability to perform the job, it's a slam-dunk case against the employer.

  2. Re:Good on SFPD Breathalyzer Mistake Puts Hundreds of DUI Convictions In Doubt · · Score: 1

    Ah, but the 0.08 isn't there to convict those drunk enough to be bad drivers (who predictably have BAC's above the original limits, roughly 0.15). It's to pick up people in roadblocks who have not been driving erratically, but who nonetheless meet the legal standard.

  3. Re:One Word on Topher Grace Screens Star Wars Prequel Re-edit · · Score: 3, Funny

    I believe that's spelled "DO NOT WANT".

  4. Re:The illusion might have added to the many reaso on Did the Titanic Sink Due To an Optical Illusion? · · Score: 1

    years later it is then known that calm water indicates fields of ice

    You know, if this is true, I'm pretty sure it was figured out a loooooong time before the Titanic sank. Whalers had been operating in icy waters since the 1600s.

  5. Re:this really needs a federal law on Cook County Judge Says Law Banning Recording Police Is Unconstitutional · · Score: 1

    I'm sure you're right... but this is Chicago. If it were going to happen anywhere, that's where it could happen.

  6. Re:this really needs a federal law on Cook County Judge Says Law Banning Recording Police Is Unconstitutional · · Score: 1

    So what happens if the state courts ignore the federal law? Do you have to wait until you have a US Attorney that wants to take up the challenge?

  7. Re:Which Cook County? on Cook County Judge Says Law Banning Recording Police Is Unconstitutional · · Score: 1

    If you don't know which Cook County contains the Loop, maybe you need to get out more.

  8. Re:this really needs a federal law on Cook County Judge Says Law Banning Recording Police Is Unconstitutional · · Score: 2

    What is a federal law going to do in state court? Not a damned thing.

  9. Re:Interesting grounds... on Cook County Judge Says Law Banning Recording Police Is Unconstitutional · · Score: 3, Informative

    What law wouldn't be stuck down by this reasoning?

    Anything that is a malum in se offense, for starters. Murder, rape, robbery, assault, burglary... these are not innocent conduct.

  10. Re:Discrimination Issues on Is It Time For Hacker Scouts? · · Score: 2

    A belief in a "higher power" is just a cop-out for belief in a deity. It has neither the rigor of belief in a deity that will hold you to account, nor the boldness of admitting none at all. If Scouting wants to maintain its insistence on belief in God, then it's entitled to - after all, it's a private organization. But don't be a fucking pussy about it.

    BTW, why not send in your certificate? You were awarded the Eagle; you earned it; you proved yourself. A principled resignation of your title does not diminish your accomplishments: it adds to them.

  11. Re:We're morons basically.. on Is Poor Numeracy Ruining Lives? · · Score: 1

    Well, go to Alaska, Oregon, Montana, New Hampshire, or Delaware. No sales tax in any of them. Of those, I've only been to Delaware, but I remember the first time I stopped to get a drink at a gas station and it was... 99 cents.

  12. Re:People continue to underestimate the Internet on Why Didn't the Internet Take Off In 1983? · · Score: 1

    I never read a.f.c either, but you never heard the expression? Since you say "bloke" I'm guessing you're UK? It was definitely part of American internet culture at the time.

  13. Re:People continue to underestimate the Internet on Why Didn't the Internet Take Off In 1983? · · Score: 4, Interesting

    You have a four-digit UID and you don't know what the September that never ended is?

  14. Re:How big is the compressor? on Japan Creates Earthquake-Proof Levitating House System · · Score: 1

    Depends on the house. In areas where the the ground never freezes, a very common construction technique is to build on a slab, in which case the weight really is pretty evenly distributed. And don't most basements have support pillars? The ones I've been in do.

  15. Re:Yes on Are Rich People Less Moral? · · Score: 1

    What's so hard, having a little self control? Making $100,000 per year?

    Both of those can be challenges, but neither is beyond me. The hard part I see is getting steady 9+% tax-deferred returns on a total investment of $50k/year. I'd love to know your tax sheltering and your choice of investments there.

  16. Re:Yes on Are Rich People Less Moral? · · Score: 1

    You can't take 5% a year out of your principal if you intend to stay ahead of inflation and market trends. Extracting 1-2% per year is about as good as you can manage, generally, because even when the market sucks you have to sell things to give you ready cash - or you have to take a job to earn money.

  17. Re:Yes on Are Rich People Less Moral? · · Score: 1
    Right, so, you're already one of the 2% right now, and very very close to the 1%. So why do you say things like:

    The top 1% pays much less than you or I do.

    Aren't you basically there?

  18. Re:Yes on Are Rich People Less Moral? · · Score: 1

    You're really rubbing elbows with the Rockefellers on that $60k/year... Paris Hilton territory for sure.

    Sorry, man, I make a hell of a lot more than $60k/year at my job, and I have lived life in the middle of the middle class - I grew up there - and I like where I am a lot better.

  19. Re:Yes on Are Rich People Less Moral? · · Score: 1

    If your assets at death would be well above $6M if you won a $6M lottery and yet lived without working for the rest of your life, that means they're probably pretty substantial already, no?

  20. Re:Yes on Are Rich People Less Moral? · · Score: 1

    In other words, you'd keep your day job, it would just be a different day job than the one you have now? Hobbies that don't pay for themselves get expensive very fast, especially if you're trying to occupy all your time with them.

    Remember, too, that your plan means that you're not planning to leave anything for your family - i.e., it's not wealthy-person behavior, it's just a lottery with a lifetime payout.

  21. Re:Yes on Are Rich People Less Moral? · · Score: 1

    Most people who acquire wealth do so, in part, to provide for future generations of their family. Your annuity allows you not to work while enjoying what is now an upper-middle-class lifestyle, but then there's inflation. Fifty years ago, according to the CPI, you needed $13,323.63 to be equivalent to $100k today. If you had bought that generous $15k/year annuity back then, you'd be spending the last of your life wondering how to pay the property taxes on that house.

  22. Re:Yes on Are Rich People Less Moral? · · Score: 1

    You're the kind of person who drums up $6M in net worth and you're going to settle for a very middle-class existence? What do you plan to do with your time? Hobbies are expensive.

  23. Re:Yes on Are Rich People Less Moral? · · Score: 1

    I went to college 950 miles from home, and I've made quite a few trips of similar length in the past couple of years. Averaging 60 mph (really averaging, counting all stops etc) that's almost 16 hours. Averaging 70, it's two hours and fifteen minutes less. How much is it worth to you to get home two hours earlier? And gas mileage really doesn't matter that much - it doesn't fall off a cliff or anything. 30 mpg suits me fine. If I got 10% better mileage by going slower, I would save... less than three gallons over the course of the day. About $10, so I'd have to value my time at less than minimum wage in order to benefit.

    Logical enough for you?

  24. Re:Yes on Are Rich People Less Moral? · · Score: 1

    Assuming you have iron financial discipline, and it's cash rather than assets, and that inflation won't make those later years very, very tight. What do you plan to do with your time? You aren't going to be traveling that much...

  25. Re:Yes on Are Rich People Less Moral? · · Score: 1

    I don't think you've calculated how far that will go, especially when you talk about liquid vs illiquid assets. And part of the point of being wealthy is to give money to your family. Especially when you talk about trying to stay ahead of inflation - you can probably afford to take 1-2% of your value out each year, which means that $6M will get you $60k-$120k a year in spendable income before you pay any taxes. That's less than two public school teachers. Sure, you don't have to work for it, but you also aren't going to be taking a lot of vacations.