Slashdot Mirror


User: All+sporks+are+fags

All+sporks+are+fags's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
67
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 67

  1. Re:ob comment on Scientists build DNA based computer · · Score: -1

    He wasn't modded at all, retard. Here's a hint: if there's no word next to his score, then he hasn't been modded. Retard. To SK: Beowulf doesn't work anymore, they figured that one out. Now you automatically lose points for saying it, which cancels out Quake. I think he'll be half modded up funny, and half modded down offtopic. Maybe more down than up, because mods hate "beowulf" more than they like "quake".

  2. Re:Long awaited American version??? on Iron Chef USA debuts Friday · · Score: -1

    Most? I don't think so. Only the stupid elitist "fans", who think that watching only subbed anime will make them special.

  3. Anonymous Coward, crap flooder, dead at 55 on Apple Patent Blocking PNG Development · · Score: -1

    I just heard some sad news on talk radio - Troller/Crap flooder Anonymous Coward was found dead in his cardboard home this morning, covered in semen. There weren't any more details. I'm sure everyone in the Slashdot community will miss him - even if you didn't enjoy riding his dong, there's no denying his contributions to CmdrTaco's "sperm bank"(i.e., sphincter). Truly a homosexual icon.

  4. Re:Your Mistakes on How Not To Ship Computers · · Score: -1

    So very true, aaron@ardiri.com, so very, very true.

  5. Re:Your Mistakes on How Not To Ship Computers · · Score: -1

    Spammers should die, eh? Two words for you, jdost223@uwsp.edu, Eat It.

  6. On the other hand.. on How Not To Ship Computers · · Score: -1

    ..it seems like your email adress is root@rzbx.org, whereas the email adress of the guy who posted your parent post is geigertube@yahoo.com, and his parent post's poster's email adress is jkoepp@atlas.socsci.umn.edu.

    Just something to think about.

  7. Re:dumbasss on How Not To Ship Computers · · Score: -1

    Not to mention meta-moderation..

    I think dude should read the /. FAQ before he makes himself look stupider.

  8. Re:dumbasss on How Not To Ship Computers · · Score: -1

    That's hardly fair to him - he also can't write very well. He's a renaissance retard.

  9. Re:In defense of the hellhole in which I work.... on How Not To Ship Computers · · Score: -1

    that smartass dumbfuck kid

    Woah, English isn't your primarily language, is it?

    Being smart pays off

    Like you'd know.

  10. Re:From A Former FEDEX Employee on How Not To Ship Computers · · Score: -1

    However if I overlooked a package and caused it to miss a flight and arrive late, I had managers up my ass.

    Riiiiiight, like that wouldn't have happened anyway.

  11. Attn Mods: czardonic is a troll! on Slashback: Crusher, Satellites, Silence · · Score: -1

    He's a troll, as is evidenced by this post, this post, and this post. Mod him accordingly.

  12. Re:Commented code on Slashback: Crusher, Satellites, Silence · · Score: -1

    Well, which is more important:

    1) Timely but poorly done, or

    2) Late but well done?

    Yeah, I know it's 1, but it shouldn't be.

  13. I have seen this face of god.. on Slashback: Crusher, Satellites, Silence · · Score: -1

    ..and it is ASCII spam.

  14. Re:Umm, okay. on Monster European Environmental Satellite · · Score: -1

    We need, (-1, Cock-Goblin)

  15. Re:Damn, that's cheap! on Monster European Environmental Satellite · · Score: -1

    p00p

  16. Re:Wow!!! on Monster European Environmental Satellite · · Score: -1

    Not if we tapped the power of hot grits!

  17. Re:European Space Program is Better on Monster European Environmental Satellite · · Score: -1

    Well, he said 3 things:

    1. Landing men on the moon. If you aren't aware that the states have done this, you're an idiot.

    2. Mars colony. I think he made this one up to be sarcastic, and because if he only used the other two then the European "space program" would only be equal to the US space program, not superior.

    3. There have been many missions of US space shuttles. You would have to be a moron (again) not to be aware of at least one of these.

    In conclusion, you're another retarded homo froggy who thinks he can be a /. troll just because it worked on your cum-guzzling eurotrash site.

  18. Re:at first glance... on Monster European Environmental Satellite · · Score: -1

    You know, learning HTML takes an IQ of about 5, so maybe you should stop being such a retard and learn how to troll like a real man, rather than being a pansy little taco snotter wannabe.

  19. Re:Link on Apple's New, Improved Airport · · Score: -1

    i hate you

  20. Re:Of course the ultimate application is... on Light Emitting Pictures On Standard Inkjet Printer · · Score: -1

    If we check the first reply to the second post in this story, we see that the parent post is -1, Redundant. The 7th root post in this thread also said the same thing.

    Mods: you know what you doing. For great justice.

  21. Re:Gee Whiz, can it light a room? on Light Emitting Pictures On Standard Inkjet Printer · · Score: -1

    HA! HA! HA! AC was being funny! Dumb fucking cock-jockey.

  22. Re:the $ question on Looking At Gobe · · Score: -1

    Wait- you ask how it will make money if it ISN'T free.. am I missing something? I can understand people who wonder about the Linux distros trying to make money off of a free product, but trying to make money by charging for software doesn't seem like such a bad idea (just ask Big Bad Bill)

  23. Re:They don't have to try too hard... on Game-development on Compaq iPaq · · Score: -1

    With even the slightest effort, at least the games will look better than a GameBoy Advance!

    With even the slightest effort, at least I be know how Enlish to speak!

  24. Re:Let me get this straight... on The Birds and the Boats · · Score: -1, Flamebait

    Ever heard of a troll? Ever hear YHBT, YHL, HAND.

  25. Re:Cleartype for Windows 2000 on InfoWorld says WinXP much slower than Win2K · · Score: 0

    Good idea! I mean, why should they charge 100+ dollars for a feature when they can give it away for free?