That sure is starting to look like the good pump & dump strategy with the ignorant masses who can't understand that these coins won't ever be secure or distributed...
Anything useful is cloned, yet another useless protection for things that SHOULD be cloned to get lower prices. Who gives a shit if your bag is fake? But who doesn't if we're talking electronic, meds, etc.
I almost wish one US state would become fully "government free", as a voluntary experiment, so we can see how everyone makes it!
We could probably watch the 99% just die, get abused, then survive through their overlord without democracy and maybe, eventually, have a revolution and rediscover democracy...
So let me guess, when say, Russia, or China, is know to have discovered a vulnerability and using it in the wild, they burn the bridge by "being nice" publicly?
I thought hydroelectricity was not considered clean by the USA, creating a weird situation with Quebec's overproduction exports (among others maybe)...
Those who did specialize in computer science early on, after high school let's say, tend to not understand physics / chemistry / biology / etc. as well, and it shows.
That doesn't mean they are anti-science / anti-global-warming or anything like that, just that the rest depends more on ambiant politic than critical use of scientific knowledge when shown scientific studies...
You do need HTTPS to protect mundane content: Saying otherwise is very short sighted...
You might not care about the content, but the way someone, somewhere, is accessing it, does offer a lot of "value". It can allow a watchful eye to either accuse the reader of being outside the norm, criminal, not respectful and whatnot (reason why librarians fought hard for the right to lend books without giving the list to the state!) or allow them to caracterise, profile, target a person over time for many different reasons.
Thus everyone should have the to right to read anonymously and willingly. Witholding this right from others is being complicit with opressors.
Slashdot Mirror
In a post-Turing world, where 1984 will be ... like 1984.
That sure is starting to look like the good pump & dump strategy with the ignorant masses who can't understand that these coins won't ever be secure or distributed...
... How is Fox still in?
Even worst, it's an unveiled fembot which probably has other extra rights compared to its human counterpart.
Buy 4x the amount of ram people buy, be good for 10 years.
Anything useful is cloned, yet another useless protection for things that SHOULD be cloned to get lower prices.
Who gives a shit if your bag is fake? But who doesn't if we're talking electronic, meds, etc.
I've always wondered how many were left in the 100 range... :)
Hey, teacher, leave them kids alone! ;)
indeed, it's a data buffet :D
I almost wish one US state would become fully "government free", as a voluntary experiment, so we can see how everyone makes it!
We could probably watch the 99% just die, get abused, then survive through their overlord without democracy and maybe, eventually, have a revolution and rediscover democracy...
Is that you?
Cause I really wanted more overhead, licences and emulations layers to debug, yééé!
Yeah uh ... no.
That won't solve fake but valid certificates magically.
The whole F-ing CA model is broken beyond repair...
Can we get rid of this joke of a model that we're all relying upon for the rest?
I'd be curious to see a graph showing UID posting for every, say, 10 accounts over the last few years. :)
And obfuscation can probably also hide their presence...
So let me guess, when say, Russia, or China, is know to have discovered a vulnerability and using it in the wild, they burn the bridge by "being nice" publicly?
I thought hydroelectricity was not considered clean by the USA, creating a weird situation with Quebec's overproduction exports (among others maybe)...
Those who did specialize in computer science early on, after high school let's say, tend to not understand physics / chemistry / biology / etc. as well, and it shows.
That doesn't mean they are anti-science / anti-global-warming or anything like that, just that the rest depends more on ambiant politic than critical use of scientific knowledge when shown scientific studies...
What they really want is white box cryptography, but it seems computationally impractical right now.
Also, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/T... did this and was broken!
You do need HTTPS to protect mundane content: Saying otherwise is very short sighted...
You might not care about the content, but the way someone, somewhere, is accessing it, does offer a lot of "value".
It can allow a watchful eye to either accuse the reader of being outside the norm, criminal, not respectful and whatnot (reason why librarians fought hard for the right to lend books without giving the list to the state!) or allow them to caracterise, profile, target a person over time for many different reasons.
Thus everyone should have the to right to read anonymously and willingly.
Witholding this right from others is being complicit with opressors.
Encryption has a cost, it isn't free. It increases CPU utilisation and power consumption. It interferes with caching and reduces network efficiency.
This is a dumb idea. A very dumb idea.
https://www.httpvshttps.com/
By FOSS do they mean dump the source after release... like Android?
I don't think that's the spirit, even though the licence says so.
Meta godwin aside, I wish a major (market wise) fork would exist with grsecurity merged in by default, for example...
I don't even understand why china, of all places, is not 100% Linux wall to wall already...