Slashdot Mirror


User: jcr

jcr's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
13,517
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 13,517

  1. Re:the "scientific" idiocy strikes again on Prayer Does Not Help Heart Patients · · Score: 1

    Even a doctorate in bullshit still only assures you're an expert on bullshit.

    Amen, brother!

    Even if it's a Harvard doctorate in bullshit.

    -jcr

  2. Re:No point to this study on Prayer Does Not Help Heart Patients · · Score: 1

    Yes, because (despite the opinion of most of Slashdot) most Christians are perfectly reasonable and logical people

    Well, except for that whole "my imaginary friend in the sky is real, I just know it" thing, perhaps.

    -jcr

  3. Re:the "scientific" idiocy strikes again on Prayer Does Not Help Heart Patients · · Score: 1

    I guess I'll just go tell the Harvard School of Divinity

    Gosh, don't you just hate it when people don't immediately capitulate when you toss off an "appeal to authority" fallacy like this?

    -jcr

  4. Re:the "scientific" idiocy strikes again on Prayer Does Not Help Heart Patients · · Score: 0, Troll

    Spoken exactly like someone who's never actually read a single book, article, essay, or probably even paragraph of theology.

    Oh, get over yourself. It doesn't matter how much verbiage you pour out, theology is not and has never been anything more than guesswork. Your attempt to equate theology with philosophy is likewise nothing more than puffery.

    -jcr

  5. Bacteria, too? on Bacteria Propel Themselves with Slime Jets · · Score: 4, Funny

    Gee, I thought it was just politicians...

    -jcr

  6. Re:Hmm.. on Prayer Does Not Help Heart Patients · · Score: 1

    Maybe they were praying to the wrong god?

    Probably, but I'm sure the FSM will forgive them.

    -jcr

  7. Re:the "scientific" idiocy strikes again on Prayer Does Not Help Heart Patients · · Score: 2, Insightful

    There's no logical basis for this type of theology

    There's no logical basis for any type of theology. It's all guessing and wishful thinking.

    -jcr

  8. Re:No point to this study on Prayer Does Not Help Heart Patients · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Most creationists believe in "microevolution"

    When faced with something so directly observable, they didn't have a lot of choice, did they?

    -jcr

  9. Re:Gates gave us opensource. on Paul Allen's Microsoft Experience · · Score: 1

    Apple should provide an option to have a clone menubar on every screen, rather than just having it on the main screen.

    That would waste even more space. I really liked NeXT's implementation of the Menu Button, which let me bring up the main menu right under the mouse, no matter where it was.

    -jcr

  10. Re:Oh....no... on An Interview with 180 Solutions · · Score: 1

    The Nuremberg defense is really getting old.

    Not only that, it was never valid in the first place.

    -jcr

  11. Re:Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation? on Paul Allen's Microsoft Experience · · Score: 1

    isn't it true that the B&MG Foundation has donated a few billion dollars to worthy causes?

    Sure, but that's completely orthogonal to what he did to get that money. Carnegie gave a way a lot of money too, but that doesn't change the fact that his hired Pinkerton thugs murdered striking steelworkers.

    -jcr

  12. Re:Gates gave us opensource. on Paul Allen's Microsoft Experience · · Score: 1

    I can't stand how much space everyone else wastes on extra menu bars.

    Then you'd probably like how NeXT implemented the main menu. It wasn't per-window, and it didn't take up the top edge of the display.

    -jcr

  13. Re:You shouldn't have let them off the hook. on An Interview with 180 Solutions · · Score: 1

    But two wrongs don't make a right

    Prosecuting a crime isn't a "wrong". Letting them do this to you with impunity is.

    -jcr

  14. Re:Oh....no... on An Interview with 180 Solutions · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Wonder what they put on their resumes

    "Please don't kill me"?

    Mind you, if I ever got a resume from someone who'd worked for a spamware company, it would go to the very same place as the spam.

    -jcr

  15. You shouldn't have let them off the hook. on An Interview with 180 Solutions · · Score: 1

    this time someone else responded and apologized. Never heard from them again.

    The crime had already been committed. You should have gone ahead and filed the charges.

    -jcr

  16. Re:Gates gave us opensource. on Paul Allen's Microsoft Experience · · Score: 1

    I still think the single menubar at the top of the screen that switches for apps is one of the worst UI elements ever, and the best thing Apple could do is wipe it out in the next release of OS X

    I'd love to see that happen, but the Mac luddites won that battle over the NeXT contingent.

    -jcr

  17. Re:Apple doesn't need Ogg Vorbis. on Apple to Face iPod Clone Attack · · Score: 1

    Several studies have been done showing that the majority of peoples issues with the encoding of their music is attributed to a placebo effect.

    Exactly.

    My hearing tops out around 25Khz (last time I tested it, probably somewhat less by now), and while I can tell that AAC-encoded, MP3-encoded and straight AIFF sources are different, I can't tell you which is which in a blind test. They all sound very, very good once you get to around 160Kbps.

    -jcr

  18. Re:Apple doesn't need Ogg Vorbis. on Apple to Face iPod Clone Attack · · Score: 1

    I could point them to a few thousand lines of code, which when copied and pasted in around 10 minutes would get them a few thousand extra sales.

    Don't you believe it. The people who care enough to insist on Vorbis are the same people who'll go right ahead and install Linux on their iPods.

    Integrating an audio decoder into the iPod firmware, testing and qualifying it, making sure of the legal clearance for its inclusion, etc, etc, is far more work than you realize. Consider also that your "few thousand lines of code" go into millions of devices, possibly increasing their memory and/or CPU requirements (Vorbis is rather more compute-intensive than MP3, for example), and you're talking about a very significant expense, which needs to be weighed against other work the development team could be doing.

    Almost a year ago, I talked to Apple's iPod marketing VP about an application that would result in selling about 5,000 units per quarter into a vertical-market application, and the answer I got was that it simply wasn't feasible to accommodate my project. 20,000 units/year is lot of Zens, but it's a miniscule number of iPods.

    -jcr

  19. Re:Apple doesn't need Ogg Vorbis. on Apple to Face iPod Clone Attack · · Score: 1

    I'm not sure if you're being deliberately obtuse

    Well, I'm quite sure you're being a pompous ass, so I'll leave you to it.

    -jcr

  20. Re:Apple doesn't need Ogg Vorbis. on Apple to Face iPod Clone Attack · · Score: 1

    How would you define "premier"? Vorbis isn't any better than the other lossy encoders, and it's worse by definition than WAV or Apple Lossless.

    -jcr

  21. Re:Apple doesn't need Ogg Vorbis. on Apple to Face iPod Clone Attack · · Score: 2

    Even among geeks, WAV, MP3, AAC and even Apple Lossless are used far more than vorbis ever is.

    -jcr

  22. Re:Apple doesn't need Ogg Vorbis. on Apple to Face iPod Clone Attack · · Score: 1

    ogg is the premier nerd music format.

    No, it's not even that.

    -jcr

  23. Re:Cry more please on Apple to Face iPod Clone Attack · · Score: 1

    They simply have no competition.

    They have competition. They don't have competent competition.

    -jcr

  24. Re:Obligatory on Apple to Face iPod Clone Attack · · Score: 4, Funny

    Over, it is. Won, Apple has. When to quit, the others know not.

    -jcr

  25. Apple doesn't need Ogg Vorbis. on Apple to Face iPod Clone Attack · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The long and short of it is, unless you can point to a million customers who would buy an iPod if it supported vorbis, and wouldn't otherwise, it's simply a non-issue to Apple. You are a vanishingly small proportion of their potential market.

    -jcr