Slashdot Mirror


An Interview with 180 Solutions

Paperghost writes "Here's a great interview between Jimmy Daniels and an anonymous ex-employee of 180 Solutions, who portrays the company as being somewhere between turmoil and meltdown. There's so many notable quotables it's scary, but here's one that really sets the tone: 'Shutting down these rogue distributors turned out to be a lot more difficult than they expected though. When you lose them, your daily installs go down drastically and the revenue goes to hell. The layoff in September could be laid directly at the feet of this effort.'"

133 comments

  1. Oh boo hoo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    And the police saying I can't put cameras in my tenants' apartment bedrooms made producing amateur porn a lot more expensive, too.

  2. Goes down drastically? by Phantombrain · · Score: 3, Insightful

    How can they have so many "rouge distributors" and not notice? It seems like someone had to say "Oh, this doesn't look right". I guess it's hard when you're a spyware company.

    --
    echo YOUR_OPINION > /dev/null
    1. Re:Goes down drastically? by Beryllium+Sphere(tm) · · Score: 5, Funny

      > How can they have so many "rouge distributors" and not notice?

      You'd think having so many "rouge distributors" would cause a lot of red faces.

    2. Re:Goes down drastically? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sadly this is slashdot, the wit required for you to get a +5 Funny for that comment just doesn't exist in this place.

      (I don't know if you've played World of Warcraft but nobody there knows the difference either.)

    3. Re:Goes down drastically? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I love that you have been modded as 'informative' with that comment.

      That is all.

    4. Re:Goes down drastically? by WebWeasel2006 · · Score: 1

      Easy just look for the ones with the amulet of yendor and rings of slow digestion.

      --
      Sometimes I get lost inside my head....
  3. And now on Captain Obvius and Clue Boy by RobertLTux · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Yes less installs + more folks getting the software ripped out by its blackened roots = less income. Im sure that Even the keystone Cops could catch this trick.

    --
    Any person using FTFY or editing my postings agrees to a US$50.00 charge
  4. eh? by rscoggin · · Score: 4, Interesting

    How can they even exist without "rogue distributors"? I was under the impression that that was about 90% of their installs... I don't really know anyone that decides to install that on their own >_>

    1. Re:eh? by Eightyford · · Score: 1, Informative

      How can they even exist without "rogue distributors"? I was under the impression that that was about 90% of their installs... I don't really know anyone that decides to install that on their own >_>

      Well you know when you, or somebody else, installs that addictive new flash game? Well one of the 15 yes buttons that you click is your permission to install that spyware and adware.

    2. Re:eh? by aussie_a · · Score: 1

      Didn't you read the article? (I'm sorry, I momentarily forgot where I was). The company's going bust. Their profits soared when they "ignored" rogue installs (by ignore, I mean happily accepted the profits from), they're now going bust after coming down on rogue installs. It doesn't take a genius to work out what's going on.

    3. Re:eh? by Firehed · · Score: 1
      But for the intellectually non-inclined, I'll explain anyways: the need for Spybot may dissapear.

      $w00t++;

      --
      How are sites slashdotted when nobody reads TFAs?
    4. Re:eh? by dqbiggerfam · · Score: 1

      180 Solutions is not the only spyware "suite" out there. The amount of spyware *might* go down(it is still a fairly lucrative business), but it will still be around.

    5. Re:eh? by lintux · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Well you know when you, or somebody else, installs that addictive new flash game? Well one of the 15 yes buttons that you click is your permission to install that spyware and adware.

      Yeah, saw that. But I'd consider that a rogue installation too, by exploiting the user instead of his/her software.

    6. Re:eh? by MrZilla · · Score: 1

      I actually once tried to download an install for Gator, just to see if they had one. I was only half surprised when I couldn't find anything but PR drivel on their site.

      --
      mov ax, 4c00h
      int 21h
    7. Re:eh? by BVis · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't consider that a rogue installation; the user is informed that they're installing this garbage, and have the option not to. That isn't a rogue installation, that's just basic user stupidity. While I won't defend the slime that writes and distributes this crap, taking advantage of someone's stupidity is what makes the (financial) world go around.

      I'd define "rogue" installation as a drive-by install exploiting an ActiveX control in IE, where there's no warning that it's installing this crap.

      --
      Never underestimate the power of stupid people in large groups.
    8. Re:eh? by lintux · · Score: 1

      Yeah, it's indeed user stupidity (as I said the installer exploits user failure instead of software failure), but in the end the user thinks (s)he's installing some "cool flash game". The game distributor tries very hard to hide the fact that it also installs some spyware.

      Maybe rogue isn't the right word. But it's certainly sneaky.

    9. Re:eh? by BVis · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't even call it "sneaky". It says right up front "Do you want to install this?" The right answer is "No", but the average moron will just click "Yes" to whatever comes up. I have very little sympathy for those people; they got themselves in trouble by installing something without knowing what it was.

      --
      Never underestimate the power of stupid people in large groups.
  5. Who? by Eightyford · · Score: 2, Informative
    I know I'm not the only one has has never heard of 180 Solutions. From Wikipedia:
    180 Solutions is the company that produces adware applications such as Zango and Seekmo. Formerly, they also produced the 180 Search Assistant (also known as 180sa) and ncase.
    1. Re:Who? by OverlordQ · · Score: 1

      Judging by your UID, 180 has been discussed numerous times.

      --
      Your hair look like poop, Bob! - Wanker.
    2. Re:Who? by Glonoinha · · Score: 4, Funny

      I know I'm not the only one has has never heard of 180 Solutions. From Wikipedia:
      Those fuckers are evil - even the Wikipedia page on 180 Solutions tried to install spyware on my computer.

      --
      Glonoinha the MebiByte Slayer
    3. Re:Who? by ximenes · · Score: 3, Funny

      You sure showed him.

    4. Re:Who? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Aren't you the guy who paid $378 for a /. account on ebay?

      http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&cate gory=0&item=2374876235

    5. Re:Who? by Onan · · Score: 5, Insightful

      By far the worst thing about slashdot editors--worse than the dupes, the typos, the mischaracterizations--is their apparent inability to write headlines and summaries that mean a damn thing to readers who don't already know every bit of obscure trivia about what's being discussed. I'm longstanding geek, I read slashdot more or less daily; I'm smack in the middle of the target audience. And yet, at least once a week I see a "summary" that's completely incomprehensible gibberish to me.

      One has to wonder why, if the editors submit writeups that are meaningless to anyone who doesn't already know exactly what's being said, they bother writing anything at all.

    6. Re:Who? by LiquidCoooled · · Score: 1
      --
      liqbase :: faster than paper
    7. Re:Who? by ximenes · · Score: 2, Interesting

      No, but I would consider selling it for $400.

    8. Re:Who? by jandrese · · Score: 1

      Uh, this is certainly not the first time this has come up on Slashdot. Do you expect the authors to explain what Linux is every time one of those stores comes up? If you're one of the 5% of Slashdot readers who didn't know what this story was about, do you think there might be a resource you could use?

      --

      I read the internet for the articles.
    9. Re:Who? by Onan · · Score: 1
      Perhaps the previous summaries provided more information about what was being discussed, clarifying for me that it was a topic in which I have no interest, and I moved on without memorizing the company's name. I've never used Windows, never plan to, never support anyone doing so, so spyware companies are not a topic to which I devote a lot of attention. But this summary said nothing more specific than "IT" and "security", which covers a lot of ground in which I am interested.

      Explaining Linux is hardly a meaningful comparison. Linux has been the primary thing covered by this site since its Chips & Dips days, and something that most of us use and discuss day in and day out. Some random spyware company is not.

      I'm not suggesting that a lengthy history need be included in every summary. But would it really have detracted from anyone's experience to s/180 Solutions/Spyware Company 180 Solutions/g ?

    10. Re:Who? by bigmouth_strikes · · Score: 1

      Your argument is correct and pointless. Whichever way the editors try to summarize the news item, there will be thousands that still have no clue what it's about, and hundreds that whine that the editor is over-simplifying the issue.

      I think the current way works well; for me, I know that whenever there's a story where I go "snuh?", there's always some relevant background info in the early replies.

      --
      Oh, I can't help quoting you because everything that you said rings true
    11. Re:Who? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Um, since when do the articles write the titles or summaries?

      Take a look at that link to the left, you know, the one that says "submit story". Or pay attention to the little line at the beginning that say "LameUserName writes in to say that..."

      In summary, your post doesn't make any sense.

    12. Re:Who? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was in the same boat. 180 who?

      But then, I use a mac.

    13. Re:Who? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I will buy it. Email me at kneppercr(a..t..) gmail D0T c0m

    14. Re:Who? by aybiss · · Score: 0

      I actually thought it was refreshing to see a headline that suggested somebody might know something about what they were talking about.

      For all the people that hang around here cranking up points with various insightful posts about spyware, how many could be ignorant of this? 180 solutions is well known by anyone who actually deals with spyware - it's like saying AMD when you're talking about computers: far from an obscure reference.

      --
      It's OK Bender, there's no such thing as 2.
    15. Re:Who? by Onan · · Score: 1

      Sure, I'm perfectly willing to accept that 180 Solutions is a well-known name among, as you say, anyone who actually deals with spyware.

      But the set of people who deal with spyware is not the same as the set of people who read slashdot. All I'm suggesting is that it would have been helpful to clarify somewhere that this article was intended for the former group, not the latter.

    16. Re:Who? by aybiss · · Score: 0

      I can see your point. I am guessing they thought that the only people who would be interested were those that recognised the name (or those that were really bored and about to be introduced to it).

      --
      It's OK Bender, there's no such thing as 2.
  6. Screen Saves and Wallpapers AHOY! by komodo9 · · Score: 3, Informative

    180 Solutions has forever ruined the free multimedia industry of the internet. Anytime I see a "free screensaver" or "free desktop wallpaper", they're usually somehow connected with spyware and adware.

    And their popups/popunders.... ugh.
    --
    BMW Forums

    1. Re:Screen Saves and Wallpapers AHOY! by Tezkah · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Complaining about advertising and then he pastes advertising at the end of his post. Typical of 2006 astroturfers.

    2. Re:Screen Saves and Wallpapers AHOY! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's a link to a BMW community site/forum.. What the fuck is wrong with you? If that's an advertisement, then everything is!

    3. Re:Screen Saves and Wallpapers AHOY! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Same as that post is an advertisement to your stupidity. Yes, EVERYthing is marketing & advertising.

    4. Re:Screen Saves and Wallpapers AHOY! by Just+Some+Guy · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Complaining about advertising and then he pastes advertising at the end of his post.

      He complained about spyware and then posted a link to a free web forum in his (hideable) signature.

      In other news, yesterday I hypocritically complained about noise pollution and then tied my shoes.

      --
      Dewey, what part of this looks like authorities should be involved?
  7. There will always be spam friendly companies by Archon-X · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    There will ALWAYS be spam friendly companies.
    There is too much money in making money off botnets, spam and other tactics for greedy people to ignore. There'll always be someone prepared to take the risk, and be prepared to turn a blind eye to suspect but profitable accounts.

  8. take the spyware test by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    3/10 and iam a security professional with 15years hardcore experience

    http://www.siteadvisor.com/quizzes/spyware_0306.ht ml

    go careful out there, perhaps a class action against the company and its officers would discourage this behaviour (or alternativly a snipers rifle and a good aim)

    1. Re:take the spyware test by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I got 7 of 8 right. You must not be very good at sniffing out shady websites. Of course, people with "hardcore" security experience tend not to have real world security experience. I don't blame you. Getting street smarts and learning how to sniff out a rat takes years of interacting with people.

      Helpful hints: If it's open source, it's probably trustworthy. If the website/project has an active "community", it's probably trustworthy. If it looks like a cheap approximation of a corporate site, run away. If they're offering something for free, and it isn't open source, RUN AWAY, unless (maybe) the product is aimed at a small demographic. Sites/projects like these are obviously trying to reach as many people as possible and are probably looking to make their investment back through adware. Set your "run away" threshold very low.

    2. Re:take the spyware test by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      By googling each site, it's easy to get 8/8.

    3. Re:take the spyware test by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      "... run away ... RUN AWAY ... run away ..."
      No wonder you PC users are so boring. If you're intrepid, or adventurous, or bold, you pretty much have to use a Mac.
    4. Re:take the spyware test by Kreigaffe · · Score: 1

      6/8... anysonglyrics needs to look slicker to deliver lyrics through activex IMO. and hey. i thought smileysource was safe, because the site SAYS you're getting spyware. I figured the other one was much worse. I'll take spyware that TELLS ME it's coming over a surprize any day. real world experience FTW. You do something dumb and then spend 3 hours un-doing it, you don't do it again. :D

      --
      ... still waiting for this free-as-in-beer free beer I keep hearing about. :|
    5. Re:take the spyware test by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      7/8, bearshare got me

    6. Re:take the spyware test by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      True. I'm the GP, and I use a Mac.

  9. content economy? by opencity · · Score: 3, Interesting

    You're not creating a content economy by making your advertising an anoyance. This 'blink tag' mentality doesn't work when everyone can provide content. How many of you, googling the capital of faroffistan, type 'wiki'? No ads, obnoxious loaders, browser crashing javascript.

    Now that content is a two (multi?) way stream we have to go back to a pre-electronic mindset. Some of the greatest paintings of the 19th century were sold to hang in restaurants. Now that's good advertising.

    --
    Physics is like sex: sure, it may give some practical results, but that's not why we do it.
    1. Re:content economy? by Fnkmaster · · Score: 1

      The "content economy" thing is BS. I understand that advertising pays for content, as it always has on TV, and we put up with it because the content is valuable and we don't want to pay the full costs of production+profits to the producers and distributors.

      But I would never intentionally put a device in my home that broadcast ads at me all day and night just so I could watch an hour of TV a day. Imagine if your TV prompted you in small print whether you wanted to "install" such a program on the TV in exchange for watching a half-hour show. People would be furious. Fuck that - if that's what these guys think the "content economy" is, then they are dreaming.

      I fail to see how any judge in a US court would think that a reasonable person would ever agree to such a contract knowingly, and that is exactly the same as what these sorts of adware companies are doing. These "agreements" between adware/spyware companies and users are almost universally deceptive and coercive and thus should be deemed illegal and unenforceable.

      Since consent to install would be presumed to be coerced and installing a program without such consent on somebody's computer is obviously illegal, this would have the pleasant effect of making all such adware crap illegal. I would love to see all these "innovators" shut down.

    2. Re:content economy? by fbjon · · Score: 1
      How many of you, googling the capital of faroffistan, type 'wiki'?
      I don't. I type 'w faroffistan' instead and get the same effect. :)
      --
      True confidence comes not from realising you are as good as your peers, but that your peers are as bad as you are.
  10. Vmware? by crossmr · · Score: 3, Interesting
    Uninstalls? Yeah. I've taken it off my neighbors computer a couple times He has three girls and it finally got so bad that I rebuilt his laptop and installed vmware, then decreed that he was the only person in the house allowed to use the computer without starting vmware first and surfing from it. He backed it up and has been happy ever since.

    Who sets up Vmware as a permanent use type of solution like this? Why not just install anti-spyware tools, use mozilla, and even toss on the tea-timer from spybot.

    I guess its been so long since I've been that naive I forget what its like..

    1. Re:Vmware? by grcumb · · Score: 5, Insightful

      "Who sets up Vmware as a permanent use type of solution like this?"

      I do. I run a few public access computer centres, and this is the only way to keep them intact. The computers run Ubuntu by default, but if someone absolutely positively needs Windows (e.g. Teaching a class about Word), they run XP in a VM, which reverts to its initial state the moment it's powered off. Thank heavens for snapshots!

      In public access situations, I really do have an 'infinite number of monkeys' at the keyboards, and this is the best way I've found to guarantee that things never break.

      --
      Crumb's Corollary: Never bring a knife to a bun fight.
    2. Re:Vmware? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This type of usage (create a "safe sandbox" that can be re-used or thrown away) is being pushed by both Intel/AMD and VMWare.

      You can download the VMWare Player for free and it also contains a link to a "safe surfing" environment.

    3. Re:Vmware? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When I surf those sites my momma use to warn me about, I make it a point to use the linux browser appliance (Ubuntu light) on vmware player. I then have no fear that I won't see those titillating popups that might not show up if I used the browser on my real PC. Heck I could even click on all the popups and see where that leads me.

    4. Re:Vmware? by crossmr · · Score: 1

      Which is fine in that type of situation, but this person is referring to a home use situation, which is entirely different. Setting up to run Vmware simply to surf because you're afraid of spyware is absolutely ridiculous.

    5. Re:Vmware? by crossmr · · Score: 1

      Which is nothing but a band-aid solution to keep people stupid. I run anti-spyware applications like once every 2-3 months and I never pick up a thing besides a few tracking cookies. Maybe people could expend a lot less effort with this kind of ridiculous setup if they learned how to surf the internet without clicking on every shiny thing that pops up in their face.

    6. Re:Vmware? by Jerf · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Setting up to run Vmware simply to surf because you're afraid of spyware is absolutely ridiculous.

      You can make a very good case that the exact opposite is true, especially if you're dealing with someone who insists on using Internet Explorer. IE has had a large number of flaws that allow hostile remote websites to do silent installs of arbitrary software. It quite likely still has some. I'm also not prepared to say Firefox doesn't have any, even though I'd expect it to be somewhat better.

      So what, you say? You only browse the safe websites? I respond, oh, you mean you absolutely, positively never make a typo in the location bar? The websites you browser are absolutely guaranteed to not be hacked?

      Heck, I've accidentally clicked on links in my spam when my touchpad acts up. I use Linux so I'm not too worried, but in Windows, that could have been enough!

      It certainly ought to be ridiculous, but if you really examine the facts of the case as they are rather than as they should be, setting up a VM for browsing makes quite a lot of sense in any situation where the user can't be trusted to re-install their OS if necessary. If that includes home use for some family where all the members have better things to do with their time than learn the arcana of Windows, so be it. The only downside is memory consumption and the fact that it makes downloading things for the host system that much harder... something in that scenario I'd be inclined to call a feature anyhow.

    7. Re:Vmware? by grimwell · · Score: 1

      Not really. The home situation is actually his neighbor's machine which is used also used by three kids.

      Having the kids' use restricted to a virtual machine means the kids can monkey around with it as much as they like without them or the parents worrying about something breaking. The monkeying around bit covers spyware installs and other misc crap websites like to install.

      This in turn greatly reduces support needs, which was the original motivation.

      --
      If the govt becomes a lawbreaker, it breeds contempt for law, it invites man to become his own law, it invites anarchy
    8. Re:Vmware? by crossmr · · Score: 1

      A responsible parent would educate their children or not permit them access to the machine when its connected to the internet. Not exactly rocket science.
      I would much rather take the time to explain to them how to proplerly use stuff, and maybe get them using another browser like mozilla/firefox, then come up with some asinine solution like forcing them to run Vmware.

      With that you're trusting them to limit themselves to vmware. What if they hose their install and you're not there? Suddenly they fire up the browser in the host OS and go to town. Education should be a higher priority.

    9. Re:Vmware? by grimwell · · Score: 1

      Maybe people could expend a lot less effort with this kind of ridiculous setup if they learned how to surf the internet without clicking on every shiny thing that pops up in their face.

      Well, those would be the rubs. It takes time to learn safe surfing, especially when there isn't much in the way of instruction and/or interest on the part of the surfer. And add to that the fact that people are actually trying to selling stuff on the internets. Lets call it marketing. The whole point of "marketing" is to get people to click on links to buy stuff or install something.

      When a particular style(shiny stuff) of marketing gets picked up on by "the unwashed masses", then the marketing style changes and people are back to clicking on stuff. And safe surfing habits have to adjust. rinse&repeat.

      Virtual Machines and sandboxes are just useful tools, that reduce the amount of support a non-expert needs. Add the trend of rootkits being used by malware and VMs & sandboxes start to make more sense. Defense in layers.

      --
      If the govt becomes a lawbreaker, it breeds contempt for law, it invites man to become his own law, it invites anarchy
    10. Re:Vmware? by bm_luethke · · Score: 1

      I've done similar things.

      Your solution assumes the user doesn't behave too badly and is trying to avoid it.

      It fails when you get a user who randomly clicks on the screen when something fails, doesn't understand (and refuses to) what popups are so they click on *all* of them, basically just does almost everything wrong and is what these people prey on.

      Now, in a business you may be able to say "screw you" but your spouse? Parents? Kids? Maybe even a neigbor that does enough other work for you that you feel obligated to "fix" thier computer. Much harder to do - your stuck with em and some of those categories are in a position to ignore any ranting you choose to do (and in some cases may even "show you who is right" and explicitly do what makes you angry). Heck, sometimes it's a choice in your job of that or quit.

      Your choices become a) severely limit thier access (not usually an option, but sometimes setting them up as a un-privledged user is an option), b) put up with it, or c) use some sort of imaging tool to reverse thier idiocy. Of those option "c" is the easiest, most effective, and can even get you out of many arguments (especially if you set the computer up such that they don't really know what you are doing).

      --
      ------- Sorry about the spelling, I suffer from two problems. Dyslexia makes it difficult to spell well, lazy makes it
    11. Re:Vmware? by crossmr · · Score: 1

      that reduce the amount of support a non-expert needs

      I really don't consider safe-surfing to be an expert need. There seems to be some misconception that any idiot should be able to use a computer and people don't realize that there are basic skills you should pick up before using one in an uncontrolled environment, which includes home use, things like:
      1)Copying, moving, deleting, renaming files
      2)how to install/uninstall software
      3)How to use basic security software like an anti-virus program or anti-spyware applications, including updating and scanning
      4)How to retrieve basic information about your computer (i.e. how to browse the control panel, bring up the taskmanager, etc even if you don't know what to do with them once you got them open, at least someone helping you can skip that part)
      5)Basic system maintenance like defragging
      6)How to run windows update
      7)How to avoid clicking on stupid crap
      8)How to manage start-ups

    12. Re:Vmware? by grimwell · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Agreed, the education is the priority. Part of the learning experience is making mistakes; both the freedom to make them and to learn from them.

      I would much rather take the time to explain to them how to proplerly use stuff, and maybe get them using another browser like mozilla/firefox, then come up with some asinine solution like forcing them to run Vmware.

      Setting up VMWare doesn't mean the parent gets out of educating their child. It just provides an easier to support&maintain computing environment. Which remember was the original point; instead of uninstall/removing crap just copy virgin image over and you're done.

      A number of children websites just don't work in non-IE browsers, e.g. ToonTown. Even in a corporate/adult environment a large number of website don't work properly in Firefox. Or worst yet work in Firefox in Windows but don't work in Firefox in unix. MBNA ShopSafe is that beast.

      A lot of children & game websites install a lot of crap. The crap isn't malware but will degrade the performance of the machine over time. If the virtual machine is configured to start from a virgin machine each time it avoids your "what if they hose it?" problem. But this can also being a pain for the user, as they would need to keep re-installing stuff(e.g. ToonTown).

      What if they hose their install and you're not there? Suddenly they fire up the browser in the host OS and go to town.

      This is really a trust issue. If they are only allowed to use the virtual machine and it got hosed, they need to wait for an adult to repair it. If they disobey a rule, then they get punished.

      Going back to your education theme, you could teach them how to restore the virtual machine to a virgin state. e.g. if your virtual machine breaks, run this batch file. The batch file overwrites their virtual machine with the virgin image and they are back in business. This is the beauty of VMWare&virtual machines.

      VMWare is basically being used in place of a seperate kids PC.

      --
      If the govt becomes a lawbreaker, it breeds contempt for law, it invites man to become his own law, it invites anarchy
    13. Re:Vmware? by grimwell · · Score: 1

      There seems to be some misconception that any idiot should be able to use a computer and people don't realize that there are basic skills you should pick up before using one in an uncontrolled environment

      Sure but out in the real world, that doesn't happen very often. And isn't likely to happen anytime soon.

      Be grateful that you haven't had provide tech support. :)

      --
      If the govt becomes a lawbreaker, it breeds contempt for law, it invites man to become his own law, it invites anarchy
    14. Re:Vmware? by incabulos · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Good call, and its worth pointing out that this is not a security concept limited to Windows and Microsoft software specifically either. Its the reason why an increasingly large number of *nix server daemons are set to run in a chrooted or jailed environment - Apache, many of the OpenBSD-affiliated projects like OpenSSH, OpenNTP, etc all can run this way.

      The idea of course being that a remote compromise will only gain access to the chroot environment rather than your juicy and tender /etc files, /sbin binaries, and anything else that can be used to compromise the system further. The same justification of IE browsing via a VMware environment that is either locked down, or easily restored back to a known-good state.

      Its simply good security practice regardless of the OS.

    15. Re:Vmware? by crossmr · · Score: 1

      oh I do tech support in my spare time while I goto college and take network engineering. I get paid pretty well for casual work, and I've seen some horror stories.
      Initial scans of ad-aware showing up like 1500+ hits and other ridiculous stuff. Mostly from people who stare at me blankly when I ask them if they understand the concept of a format, or how to install a program.

    16. Re:Vmware? by modecx · · Score: 1

      Your logic dances around two or more important facts, the first being: many, dare I say Most, adults "just don't get computers", and therefore they don't understand many possible dangers of kids using computers, and secondly, these days the levees aren't exactly overflowing with what you call "responsible parents", and whether or not they ever did in the past is up for question.

      --
      Constitutional rights may be respected, repealed, or modified; but they must never be ignored.
    17. Re:Vmware? by Beryllium+Sphere(tm) · · Score: 1

      >The websites you browser are absolutely guaranteed to not be hacked?

      Or never to carry advertising content from an infected server? Or never to be DNS-hijacked?

      Staying on reputable web sites does lower your risk but nothing more than that. Noscript is your good friend.

    18. Re:Vmware? by crossmr · · Score: 1

      we can all hope for something better can't we? ;)

    19. Re:Vmware? by TCM · · Score: 1

      Or, taking it a step further, use Systrace which eliminiates the need to run e.g. OpenNTP in a chroot. It even eliminates the need to run it as root to bind to *:123.

      With Systrace, you can define what each application can do on the system call level and with pattern matching on their arguments. You could even run OpenNTP as user nobody and provide an exception in the policy that raises its uid to 0 for the duration of the bind() system call only.

      Cool stuff. Wasn't really aware of it although it exists for years now.

      --
      Of course it runs NetBSD. BTC: 1NT7QvbetmANwaMzhpVL6
    20. Re:Vmware? by skinnygmg · · Score: 1

      couldn't you use WINE to run winword on ubuntu?

      just a thought...

    21. Re:Vmware? by pjc50 · · Score: 1

      Despite being a heavyweight solution, I think it's a great idea. One step closer to disposable computing. It doesn't matter if the software is rubbish if you can throw it away after using it.

    22. Re:Vmware? by MrWint · · Score: 1

      I've used Deep Freeze a few times when I've needed to setup a Windows machine for public use or in a lab. Users can do whatever they want on the computer including installing programs, make registry changes whatever and it's all gone, back to normal on reboot. Deep Freeze is a commercial app, but it's pretty reasonably priced and works great.

    23. Re:Vmware? by modecx · · Score: 1

      Oh, sure, and there's no doubt that such hoping would be very comforting. But I take favor with Sam Clemens on this one: "Lord save us all from a hope tree that has lost the faculty of putting out blossoms."

      --
      Constitutional rights may be respected, repealed, or modified; but they must never be ignored.
    24. Re:Vmware? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > or c) use some sort of imaging tool to reverse thier idiocy.

      Preferably a large, blunt imaging tool.

    25. Re:Vmware? by grimwell · · Score: 1

      oh I do tech support in my spare time

      Ahhh, grasshopper. Don't waste too much of your spare time doing tech support. You'll get more than your fill of it when you join the work a day world. There are much better things to do in college. :)

      --
      If the govt becomes a lawbreaker, it breeds contempt for law, it invites man to become his own law, it invites anarchy
    26. Re:Vmware? by crossmr · · Score: 1

      At my age, and married, I'm well past that, I'm not so young. I've been doing tech support for a lot of years in my spare time, just never as my main job. Besides I quite enjoy troubleshooting and cleaning up PCs and educating people about how to keep their PC clean.

  11. Actually, it's pretty common by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Especially now that the VMWare Player is free. You can download a linux browsing image, with Firefox, etc, then just reboot it if/when things go wrong.

  12. Oh yeah... by thej1nx · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Shutting out your primary distribution channel and clientele is ofcourse, a bad business policy.

    Which no sane company will ofcourse do. Especially considering that their entire business model depends on adware/spyware.

    So all I can surmise is, they are trying to get at least some good PR value out of a bad quarter :p

    They do need a more positive public perception of them, considering the recent cases against spyware makers/distributors.

  13. Oh....no... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    I feel so bad for these guys...especially the guys that are surprised by the pink slips.

    Poor malicious coders.

    Wonder what they put on their resumes...probably would load it with spyware if the paper supported it.

    AC

    1. Re:Oh....no... by jcr · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Wonder what they put on their resumes

      "Please don't kill me"?

      Mind you, if I ever got a resume from someone who'd worked for a spamware company, it would go to the very same place as the spam.

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    2. Re:Oh....no... by cptgrudge · · Score: 1
      Mind you, if I ever got a resume from someone who'd worked for a spamware company, it would go to the very same place as the spam.

      Everyone needs to eat. Sometimes we do what we have to in order to survive.

      "Let's see, I can eat, pay bills, and make ends meet, or not work for this company with which I have philisophical differences."

      Just because someone works for one of these companies doesn't mean that they are "evil".

      --
      Qualitas edurus commercium, nullus penitus net rimor, nullus deus beneficium
    3. Re:Oh....no... by slavemowgli · · Score: 1

      Yeah... because there are literally *no* other openings available, right? There is *no* other company in the world you can work for? Get real. The Nuremberg defense is really getting old.

      --
      quidquid latine dictum sit altum videtur.
    4. Re:Oh....no... by jcr · · Score: 1

      The Nuremberg defense is really getting old.

      Not only that, it was never valid in the first place.

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    5. Re:Oh....no... by cptgrudge · · Score: 1
      You're telling me that anyone, anywhere can just get decent work for what they want to do, at a company that they love? That nobody is ever driven to work a job that they dislike in order to survive? That someone cannot be trapped by circumstances?

      You're the one who needs to get real. We don't live in some happy, zero-unemployment, workers' market utopia. The workers don't always have choice. And I wasn't *just* talking about tech jobs. Lots of people compromise their ethics in their jobs.

      I'm not saying that working for a company like this is necessarily "good", but we could give someone the benefit of the doubt before just dismissing them out of hand because "they worked for X company". Their character can come out in the interview.

      --
      Qualitas edurus commercium, nullus penitus net rimor, nullus deus beneficium
  14. The "new" Karma Whoring? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    I know I'm not the only one has has never heard of...

    The "new" Karma Whoring?

  15. OT: TV Ads by pipingguy · · Score: 1


    Lately I've been seeing TV ads featuring smiling, happy actors standing in front of expensive automobiles and houses claiming that they now earn $5K (and up) per month for doing relatively little work. Somehow this is possible by using a computer and the internet.

    Reading the small print on the screen tells the viewer that, after registering online, the viewer will be directed to some other website that features "business opportunities". It seems like every time I catch this ad there is a different URL and the URLs are always alphanumerical.

    1. Re:OT: TV Ads by Detritus · · Score: 1
      The changing URLs are probably to measure ad response rates.

      It's a pretty slick ad, and has been on the air for a long time. They must be doing something right to have paid for the ad and kept it on the air.

      I just wish it was that easy to make "big money" on the Internet.

      --
      Mea navis aericumbens anguillis abundat
    2. Re:OT: TV Ads by PitaBred · · Score: 1

      Sure it's easy. Just make those sites and drive traffic to them. What, you expected that it was the people going to those URL's that made the money? Silly rabbit.

    3. Re:OT: TV Ads by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      huh? that made absolutely no sense. explain again in english.

    4. Re:OT: TV Ads by gstoddart · · Score: 2, Insightful
      huh? that made absolutely no sense. explain again in english.

      Simple, they're usually MLMs or some other crap. The people on the other end of those sites are probably going to charge you a fee for participation -- they make money. You sign up for some silly scheme, you might make money, or you might just waste your time and the money you have now.

      Classic money making scheme:

      Send me $20, and I'll send you instructions on how to make a fortune. They send you $20, and you tell them to get people to send them $20 in exchange for secret money making secrets. For every person you sign up, I get a cut.

      Somewhere in the maze, there might be one or two actual products -- there has to be, or it's a straight up fraud. But mostly it's comission structures and fluff that says if you can sign up other people or market to other suckers you'll make a fortune. The money is made by all sorts of intermediary comissions, not on the actual product -- unless you're the manufacturer. [ In the case of spam, the guys sending the messages are getting paid if you buy, so you annoy a million or so people with "g3t a big p3nis" crap ]

      The people who have large amounts of people below them in the pyramid ... ahem ... business opportunity rake in money like mad. The people at the bottom try very hard to get more suckers. so they can make money like mad. Only a few people ever make any real money, everyone else is slavishly making money for someone else, thinking they're gonna make themselves rich.

      Think referral programs. Think Amway. Think of 'affiliate' programs from the 90s. Think spammers, cold callers, or other creative ways of seling. Advertiser pays promoter for qualified hits/leads/sales/eyeballs. Promoter hires lots of little promoters to do the volume, then make their money of economies of scale.

      Any time someone wants to get you to listen to a 'business opportunity', and won't tell you what it is up-front, is probably hawking one of these. Frequently, it's accompanied by trying to get you to come to a presentation, where hopefully they can fill your head with ideas of being rich, and have some more experienced shark button-hole you and sign you up. Run from these people -- very fast! They're very slick, and they generally over-represent your odds of actually making any money. [ You could make a fortune selling red smarties, and get your own supply of red smarties at wholesale prices. The real money is in finding other people who want to make a fortune selling red smarties ]

      The guy who signs you up is hoping to make money from you. The guy who signed him up is hoping to make money from you, and so on. You're just grist for the mill. The more people they sign up at the bottom end, the more the guys at the top roll around in piles of money they no longer need to work for, because a large number of guys are schlepping the products they no longer remember anything about.

      At best, most of these things are dubious. At worst, they can be quite cultish and downright scary (*cough* Amway *cough*) -- these people approach the whole 'free money' game with almost religious zeal. It's in their interest to convince you that your family and friends don't recognize a good business opportunity (and who needs 'em anyway), and that the snake-oil they're selling is really worth the money.

      Make a fortune by working at home for 2 hours a day in your underwear? Yeah, right. They just prey on vulnerable people who are currently not making enough money and can't get a job that lets them. Or unscrupulous people who don't mind working in grey areas.

      There is no free lunch.
      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
  16. Re:Anyone else thought of Journey? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No, because it's not 1981.

  17. 180 solutions can burn in hell by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

    I had a run in with one of their people not too many months ago. I had been put on one of their spam mailing lists and I emailed their address to ask for my domain to be removed. Initially, I got a person who said that they wouldn't do it. When I replied and said that I would file a complaint with their upstream data provider, I found my email address mailbombed with additions to about 5000 mailing lists. Luckily these days most mailing lists ask for a confirmation and those that don't I weeding out pretty quick. The moron also didn't realize that most mailing lists confirm messages also include the IP of the subscriber. I replied again and included the draft letter to the upstream provider and a letter of the local police department's electronic crimes office for an attempted DoS attack, but this time someone else responded and apologized. Never heard from them again. Before the slashbots jump on me for replying to SPAM, I'd like to say that I've already paid the price.

  18. I don't want them to go under... by rsmoody · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I am honestly not trying to start a flame war or be a troll, just wanted to say what I feel. In some ways, I don't want the adware crap companies like 180 to go away. I make a lot of extra money off of companies like them. Heck, after I left my last job, this sort of crapware kept me employed for a few months until I got another decent job. We all know it's about money and money only. You think that ANY of these people care one bit about the damage to people's computer they cause, or they money these people spend to get rid of the crapware? Hell no! Just like ANY company now days, as long as the big-wigs and/or share holders are richER that's all that matters and all that EVER will matter. Call it capitalism if you wish, but I call it greed and the day I never make a dime from the crap they put on people's computers will be a great day indeed. Good riddance to bad rubbish! Even if I won't get extra money.

    --
    45 5F E1 04 22 CA 29 C4 93 3F 95 05 2B 79 2A B2
    1. Re:I don't want them to go under... by Jerf · · Score: 2, Informative

      You're not directly claiming this, but you might want to read up on the broken window fallacy. If you were not always fixing damage done by others, society could use your skills in a more productive manner.

    2. Re:I don't want them to go under... by shmlco · · Score: 1

      Of course, the fallacy behind the fallacy is that it assumes he's capable of being used in a more productive manner...

      --
      Any sect, cult, or religion will legislate its creed into law if it acquires the political power to do so.
    3. Re:I don't want them to go under... by Jerf · · Score: 1

      Well, I have a hard time with the idea that the only productive thing he can do is remove spyware. :)

      But, I suppose if I really break down the economics, at least one of the following is true: 1. He could obtain higher pay elsewhere doing something else, and in an economic sense probably should, or 2. He can not obtain higher pay somewhere else, therefore this is the most valuable thing he can be doing, therefore if the spyware problem went away while he wouldn't necessarily be jobless, he would take a pay cut.

      Still, all else being equal and with my understanding of society, the first is more likely than the second. The free market may be the most efficient thing we know for allocating resources (including job skills), but it's far from 100% perfect, for any reasonable definition of perfect efficiency.

    4. Re:I don't want them to go under... by mike2R · · Score: 1

      I think it's more that his customers would spend their money on other things, thus helping the economy as a whole - I don't think you can argue that people breaking windows is anything but good for the glazier..

      --
      This sig all sigs devours
    5. Re:I don't want them to go under... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wouldn't go onto a community of millions of spam hating hacker nerds and tell them I made spyware, that's just asking for it.

  19. Now that's what I call... by Spy+der+Mann · · Score: 1

    a "180" degree turn! :P

  20. How hard is it? by neonleonb · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    You know it's hard out here for spyware,
    when you're tryin' to sell Viagra to the men.
    On viruses and trojans we depend,
    And Firefox is givin' us a scare.

  21. You shouldn't have let them off the hook. by jcr · · Score: 1

    this time someone else responded and apologized. Never heard from them again.

    The crime had already been committed. You should have gone ahead and filed the charges.

    -jcr

    --
    The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    1. Re:You shouldn't have let them off the hook. by Splab · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You know, not everyone is a vendictive bastard.

      Yes the representive of the firm did a bad thing, and yes the firm in itself is probably a bad thing. But two wrongs don't make a right unless you are going left - so calm down, smile and try to be polite even though people are pissing on you.

    2. Re:You shouldn't have let them off the hook. by jcr · · Score: 1

      But two wrongs don't make a right

      Prosecuting a crime isn't a "wrong". Letting them do this to you with impunity is.

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    3. Re:You shouldn't have let them off the hook. by MadUndergrad · · Score: 1

      You don't have to be a vindictive bastard to play Tit-for-Tat, in fact it's requisite that you're not. If these people can get off the hook with a simple apology they'll never learn. It was in society's interest for GP to proceed with a legal case.

    4. Re:You shouldn't have let them off the hook. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why do you fucking sign all your damn posts with '-jcr'? We KNOW who it is. It's your fucking login ID which is CLEAR AS DAY in your posts.

  22. good news to me by xamomike · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I welcome the day when adware/spyware companies start going out of business. These companies should expect that these are not long term ventures, and most people are very irratated by their software no matter how they try to present it. Yes, a small economy surrounds the business of spyware, but it's business based on mass numbers (i.e. casualties) and not by innovation, or any sort of usefullness. Just like the old days of selling blind-link traffic and 404 traffic, except we knew it had its days numbered. Surfing the net for most people means easy access to information, it shouldn't be a blind pit of junk waiting for you to stumble upon the wrong link :)

    --
    There are 10 types of people in the world; those who can read binary, and those who can't.
  23. 180 Solutions exploits Wikipedia for marketing by Brushen · · Score: 5, Informative
    http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Zango_Me ssenger&oldid=14840188

    Look at this Wikipedia revision, creating an article on a 180 Solutions product. Look at the history tab, and you will note this revision was done by the IP address 206.169.156.2. The IP address corresponds with 180 SOLUTIONS HOOKED-2 when looked up in the American Registry for Internet Numbers.

    The article was changed to give it a more neutral tone many times, but in all cases the IP address tried to revert to the original version. The article in its current form is located here, but with a sign that says that everything in this article but not be accurate, nor true. The IP address range for 180 Solutions is 206.169.156.0 - 206.169.156.255. See this American Registry for Internet Numbers entry for 180 Solution's physical address. The city can be confirmed by Wikipedia itself.

    This was done in June 2005, around the same time the U.S. Congress staffers began editing Wikipedia, coincidentally. Again, using Wikipedia as a source, this company has less than 250 employees. Because this IP address came from the company, what are the odds that the editor created that article about that "instant messaging service" for love of the company alone? It reads like an advertisement.

    They used Wikipedia to market their filth, and spyware company or not, that's something I'll always hold in contempt. (mod up)

    1. Re:180 Solutions exploits Wikipedia for marketing by Brushen · · Score: 1
      I should know what 180 Solutions was. I was infected by it once. I was in the middle of installing a video game I had downloaded, while browsing the Keenspot website, which is a service that hosts webcomics. One of Keenspot's advertisers had gone rogue, BurstNet, and started dispensing spyware to whoever went there.

      I, having thought I was still in the middle of installation, installed install026.exe when it queried me. It took me a $40 purchase of MacAfee and about a month's time to get it completely off. It binded to the root of the computer, infecting vital files, such that they could not be deleted without hurting the computer itself.

    2. Re:180 Solutions exploits Wikipedia for marketing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I guess 180 Solution's marketing is akin to posting a subliminal (mod up) request at the end of one Slashdot post

    3. Re:180 Solutions exploits Wikipedia for marketing by dozer · · Score: 1

      You haven't heard that? It's the new urban to replace peace out.

      Gotta run. mod up.

    4. Re:180 Solutions exploits Wikipedia for marketing by orkysoft · · Score: 2, Insightful

      In the article's history, click on the IP address in question, and you'll see the other articles that person (or persons) have edited. Then click on a link labeled "diff" to see what was added. Here's a funny example...

      --

      I suffer from attention surplus disorder.
    5. Re:180 Solutions exploits Wikipedia for marketing by FtVirgin · · Score: 1

      Also discuss this here on the unofficial Wikipedia discussion forum, Wikipedia Review :) http://wikipediareview.com/index.php?showtopic=492

  24. OT: advertisements by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    a link in your signature is fine. we can turn off sigs so we dont have to see your retarded product placements.

    a link pasted at the end of a post for ANYTHING is an unwanted advertisement.

  25. In other news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When you stop robbing banks and dealing drugs in favor and start selling Burgers at Mac Donald's, your revenue goes down drastically.

  26. Their business model by mwvdlee · · Score: 1

    When your business revolves around shoving ads down consumers' throats with nothing in return, you're destined to fail.

    --
    Slashdot social media options: AIM, ICQ, Yahoo, Jabber and Mobile Text. Why no MySpace?
  27. Unemplyed is the best option by Anne+Thwacks · · Score: 1
    I don't think they should be afraid to be unemploeyd. If ever anyone deserved to be the vistim of a drive by shooting, these f*ckers are top of the list.

    They are in the same league with Al-Quaieda when it comes to evil.

    They have destroyed billions of dollars of pruductivity and are probably directly responsible for the attitude that computers have to be thrown away on a regular basis because its easier to throw them away than get rid of the spyware.

    --
    Sent from my ASR33 using ASCII
  28. Another interview from the same site last April... by Paperghost · · Score: 1

    http://www.revenews.com/wayneporter/archives/00056 5.html Interesting to compare and contrast the official line with the anonymous version!

  29. scum by Stanneh · · Score: 1

    i am the designated pc fixer dude round here and 180 solutions has absolutely made my life a complete hell time after time. so to all the peaple who work at 180 solutions that are reading slashdot i hope each and every one of you die of cancer.

    --
    I Predict A Riot
  30. 180 who? oh yeah! by metalpet · · Score: 1

    I had to read the first posts to remember when I had seen that name before.
    Then it all came back to me: Last week, as I wasted a few hours cleaning up a relative's computer, and was getting amazed at the seemingly endless list of malware that can fit on one single computer.
    At least, they didn't have a hidden service that refused to die and kept rewriting the same registry key every 2 seconds to guarantee it'd run next time the box reboots. (if you ever bump into that, setting a draconian ACL on the parent registry key can help.)

  31. WHAT by BillGod · · Score: 1

    how is it possible that you people have never heard of 180 solutions? Am I wrong here? How can you possibly refere to yourself as a geek? Have you touched a computer besides your fbsd hackproof spyware proof computer? they have been around for years. 180 and gator were the inventors of modern day spyware.

    --
    MISSING - Sig file. 2 years old black and white and very funny. If found please email me.
  32. 3/10 ???? are you retarded by BillGod · · Score: 1

    7/8 emule screwed me.. DAMN you EMULE!!!!!

    --
    MISSING - Sig file. 2 years old black and white and very funny. If found please email me.
  33. Another misleading Slashdot heading by smallpaul · · Score: 4, Insightful

    How can an interview with an ex-employee be regarded as "An Interview with 180 Solutions?"

  34. Re:another American company by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Who's 'iam'?

  35. Oh boy, here we go by LunaticTippy · · Score: 1
    Poor scatology entry on wikipedia.

    I thought it got a lot of graffiti before it was posted on slashdot.

    --
    Man, you really need that seminar!
  36. Re:3/10 ???? are you retarded by LunaticTippy · · Score: 1
    7/8 emule screwed me.. DAMN you EMULE!!!!!

    You're complaining because emule doesn't install spyware?!?

    Damn spoiled kids these days...

    --
    Man, you really need that seminar!
  37. Sir, I believe you are mistaken. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A) It's totally offtopic, thus it is an ad.
    B) That's not the hidable signature, that was pasted into the post.

    But you do have one point--the more agressive marketers are, the more I try to tune them out, filter them, or boycott whatever they sell. Like those Jack in the Box commercials--they've helped to completely prevent me from eating there, ever.

    There are plenty of other places to eat. I might as well pick one that isn't obnoxious.

  38. WTF does 180solutions Do? by billstewart · · Score: 1

    I gather from context that they do something in the spyware business, and Wikipedia has more detail, presented in a relatively neutral lawsuit-avoiding manner. But what do they really do? Pay people who trick\\\\\entice users into installing their software and collect money from ads that it displays? Is their software obvious and removable these days, or is it near-rootkit invisible?

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks