"They keep trying, however the true fact remains no encryption was used by these terrorists."
I don't know if this is true. But it doesn't matter. You can't uninvent encryption. If every American company is forced to backdoor their software, it won't stop terrorists using perfectly secure encryption.
Maybe the idea is that all "innocent" people will use the broken encryption, leaving anyone using the real thing as a target. But there are enough people, and especially companies, that will insist on using secure encryption to make this unworkable in a short time.
Please allow me to revise my response to: "The Ice Age question was a potential concern for an indefinite future of unknown timing. Again this uncertainty was a driver for initial funding on major climate science."
-- Yes, the climate cycles that lead to ice ages in the past and would have normally caused their return was being studied, But the timescales were in the tens of thousands of years, and once the impact of humanity in greenhouse gases, deforestation, etc, was taken into account it completely swamped the natural cycles.
Whether the next ice age would have come in five or ten thousand years without human intervention is an interesting but purely academic question. Global warming is a problem for our children, not the next millennium.
"you obviously weren't there in my grad school. The Ice Age question was a potential concern for an indefinite future of unknown timing. Again this uncertainty was a driver for initial funding on major climate science." Give a citation, not an anecdote with not one verifiable fact.
"There is an element of changing perspectives, and repeating fashions here." The "changing perspective" is that what was highly speculative in the 70s is now based on incontrovertible peer-reviewed evidence collected over decades by thousands of scientists. Yet you argue that uncited statements made by unnamed people 50 years ago invalidates any research presented since.
"And you slightly demonstrate my thesis of angry dissonant crowds " You called people who disagree with you "zealots" while those who do agree with you are "realists". Then you tut tut at people getting annoyed at your labels. Sorry, arrogant hypocrites do make me angry. It's a character flaw, I admit.
First you say: "Angry CAGW zealots meet climate realists" Ten you hypocritically complain: "simple denigration of oppositional views and their holders is not going to be effective"
"I have a much harder science background"... in climate science? I studied physics and computer science. And I know enough to know what I'm not an expert in.
Also, the repeated talking point "the principal criticism of CO2 was its likely lack of adequate effect to prevent an Ice Age" is a complete fabrication by denialists, based on a few Sunday supplement stories, not peer-reviewed scientific articles. And that was 50 years ago. We have collected a bit more data since then.
I'm sure there are plenty -- whether it's 99% or 50% , it's still millions -- who would just use a card with their real identity. Anyway, we'll find out when the database is dumped.
"look for them here in earth. Use them to sieve the thousands of stories about aliens"
That truly would be a complete waste of money. All these loonie stories kidnapping, anal probes, etc, etc, is why serious SETI gets treated as a joke.
Anyway,it's been done. The answer is 99% proven nothing happened, 1% unknown.
Use your brain. If aliens are visiting us with such frequency, WHERE IS THE PHYSICAL EVIDENCE? Any artefact made off-earth will have a different isotopic ratio, even if we don't know what it is. Where is one drop of alien sweat with their DNA or equivalent?
"If the search for extraterrestrial life leads to that life deciding to destroy all life on earth, would it still be a "good investment" ?"
The proposed plan is for listening only, not broadcasting a "here we are" signal,.
If there are indeed malignant and hostile aliens who extermiante every other species that pops up, it would be even more important to know all we can about them.
"Too many variables to know what is really going on atm."
Yes.Which is why actually doing some legwork rather than just theorising makes sense.
$100m is nothing compared to the potential consequences of discovering ET life.
Even if the chance is 1 in a million, it's a good investment.
Slashdot editors don't use, or ignore, spellcheck anyway.
They don't check anything really. Multiple dupes, ten-year-old stories resubmitted, obvious bogus stories, etc, etc. Offences against grammar are the least (but still irritating) of their sins.
People have been asking that FOR 20 FUCKING YEARS =========== http://www.f-secure.com/v-desc... Virus:W32/Concept Virus:W97M/Concept also known as Word Prank Macro or WW6Macro - is a macro virus which has been written with the Microsoft Word v6.x macro language. It has been reported in several countries, and seems to have no trouble propagating in the wild.
WM/Concept used to be extremely widespread during 1995-1997. =========== I remember back in 2000, my boss asking "How do I run this "I Love You" macro someone sent me?"
Word macros were cool and useful, until Microsoft decided it was clever to embed them in the document.
And they did the same fucking thing with "Windows Media" And USB autoexec
Always prioritising some gimmicky shit that allowed advertisers to push crap over security, and allowed any asshole to take over your PC by getting you to open a document or media file. .
Mass transit subsidies are more obvious, but private transport is massively subsidised by the government and community. Roads, highways, bridges, tunnels, etc, etc. Hundreds of billions is spent on road infrastructure. (Some overlap here, but the great proportion is used by private cars.) Hundreds of billions on health costs -- car accidents, air pollution. Hundreds of billions in wars to secure access to automobile fuel.
If all the costs of private urban road transport were added up, maybe we could see which forms of transport really cost more.
If anyone wants to download a bootleg Kindle edition, you can easily find them online very shortly after publication (And many books with no official ebook edition have homemade versions of varying quality as well.)
Most Kindle books are 500kB or so, less than a hi res scan of a page.
So this scan/print/sign/register/download method is much more work than what you can already do now.
You can call them "shit" if you want, but then you would have to acknowledge that the theory and history of economics is shit, because that's what I'm referring to. I studied this "shit", dude, in pretty exhausting detail.
You are the one who declares everything different from the US system is shit. That everyone must accept your definitions of socialism, communism, capitalism, constitution.
Political philosophy evolves. It isn't frozen with whatever the first famous person to write a book about it said.
Studying exhaustively doesn't mean you are impartial. I see far many people here with a wealth of detailed knowledge they use to support their prejudices.
I know socialists and they don't believe what you insist they do. I know communists and they are mostly good, altruistic people. But I know what would happen should they get real power.
Marx isn't Mohammed. He doesn't define "socialism" for everyone now, if he ever did, and certainly few if any socialists I know would defer to his definition. Any Marxists still around hate socialists more than anyone else for not being pure enough.
Maybe I should have used "democratic socialism" which is what most current socialists profess.
Anyway, you haven't actually cited any sources, just invoked some names.
Not under one Constitution, which is what I referred to.
Fine. Enabling you to just completely ignore any country, like most of Europe, that didn't follow your exact historical progression and evolved their constitutions rather than creating them in a dramatic event.
Communism -- true Communism, by the very definition of what Communism is -- has no government. Name me one country in written history that qualifies.
That was the final stage, which of course was never attained. Many though did have quite idyllic "all for one and one for all" periods of altruistic government for a short time after the revolution, until the assholes started manoeuvring for power.
Anyway, I wouldn't care about your silly word games except you are using them to say every form of government except your own is shit. A sadly common insular American attitude.
Socialism, for example, has proven to be the world's ripest breeding ground for corruption, because it is designed to be led by a relatively few people in the first place.
Presumably this is some weird American definition, not used by anyone who actually is a socialist.
And I know that there are plenty of corrupt oligarchies that name themselves "socialist". Same as the many countries, like North Korea, that label themselves as "Democratic" don't make the idea invalid.
The U.S. has the longest-standing Constitutional government in the last milennium or two. That says an awful lot for this system, as opposed to others that have been tried in the same period.
Parliamentary democracy has lasted well over a millennium (e.g. Iceland continuously since the 10th C) and is doing fine, thanks.
there has never been a real Communist government in written history
Well, there have, but within a decade of attaining power they all become juntas or oligarchies or even monarchies (North Korea again). Sadly communism is too idealistic about human nature and doesn't have the checks and balances to stop power crazy psychopaths from taking control. Your constitution was written to prevent excessive concentration of power, and is fairly effective at that, frustrating as it is for zealots on either side. But it's not the only workable way to do it.
DHCP lets you log into the printer and configure a static IP, then reboot it.
Better than having it locked on an IP outside the range you use in your LAN, or that duplicates an existing device.
Slashdot Mirror
"They keep trying, however the true fact remains no encryption was used by these terrorists."
I don't know if this is true. But it doesn't matter. You can't uninvent encryption. If every American company is forced to backdoor their software, it won't stop terrorists using perfectly secure encryption.
Maybe the idea is that all "innocent" people will use the broken encryption, leaving anyone using the real thing as a target. But there are enough people, and especially companies, that will insist on using secure encryption to make this unworkable in a short time.
Four links in the lead para. All identical, all to "WindowsIT.pro".
Show some restraint in shoving your brand down our throats.
One link is informative. Two is over--enthusiastic. FOUR IS SPAM.
Please allow me to revise my response to:
"The Ice Age question was a potential concern for an indefinite future of unknown timing. Again this uncertainty was a driver for initial funding on major climate science."
-- Yes, the climate cycles that lead to ice ages in the past and would have normally caused their return was being studied, But the timescales were in the tens of thousands of years, and once the impact of humanity in greenhouse gases, deforestation, etc, was taken into account it completely swamped the natural cycles.
Whether the next ice age would have come in five or ten thousand years without human intervention is an interesting but purely academic question. Global warming is a problem for our children, not the next millennium.
"you obviously weren't there in my grad school. The Ice Age question was a potential concern for an indefinite future of unknown timing. Again this uncertainty was a driver for initial funding on major climate science."
Give a citation, not an anecdote with not one verifiable fact.
"There is an element of changing perspectives, and repeating fashions here."
The "changing perspective" is that what was highly speculative in the 70s is now based on incontrovertible peer-reviewed evidence collected over decades by thousands of scientists. Yet you argue that uncited statements made by unnamed people 50 years ago invalidates any research presented since.
"And you slightly demonstrate my thesis of angry dissonant crowds "
You called people who disagree with you "zealots" while those who do agree with you are "realists". Then you tut tut at people getting annoyed at your labels. Sorry, arrogant hypocrites do make me angry. It's a character flaw, I admit.
"you cannot see in which folders reside the bookmarks found. "
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-...
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-...
First you say: "Angry CAGW zealots meet climate realists"
Ten you hypocritically complain: "simple denigration of oppositional views and their holders is not going to be effective"
"I have a much harder science background"... in climate science? I studied physics and computer science. And I know enough to know what I'm not an expert in.
Also, the repeated talking point "the principal criticism of CO2 was its likely lack of adequate effect to prevent an Ice Age" is a complete fabrication by denialists, based on a few Sunday supplement stories, not peer-reviewed scientific articles. And that was 50 years ago. We have collected a bit more data since then.
Cite real sources or STFU.
Check if Library Genesis has an epub of it.
That's how you'd do it.
I'm sure there are plenty -- whether it's 99% or 50% , it's still millions -- who would just use a card with their real identity. Anyway, we'll find out when the database is dumped.
"look for them here in earth. Use them to sieve the thousands of stories about aliens"
That truly would be a complete waste of money.
All these loonie stories kidnapping, anal probes, etc, etc, is why serious SETI gets treated as a joke.
Anyway,it's been done.
The answer is 99% proven nothing happened, 1% unknown.
Use your brain. If aliens are visiting us with such frequency, WHERE IS THE PHYSICAL EVIDENCE?
Any artefact made off-earth will have a different isotopic ratio, even if we don't know what it is.
Where is one drop of alien sweat with their DNA or equivalent?
"If the search for extraterrestrial life leads to that life deciding to destroy all life on earth, would it
still be a "good investment" ?"
The proposed plan is for listening only, not broadcasting a "here we are" signal,.
If there are indeed malignant and hostile aliens who extermiante every other species that pops up, it would be even more important to know all we can about them.
"Too many variables to know what is really going on atm." Yes.Which is why actually doing some legwork rather than just theorising makes sense. $100m is nothing compared to the potential consequences of discovering ET life. Even if the chance is 1 in a million, it's a good investment.
Again, its not the "dating profile" that matters, but the membership in the site. You need real details for the financial transactions.
(Yeah, they could use bitcoin, but this isn't a geek site, they'd just use their AmeX.)
Slashdot editors don't use, or ignore, spellcheck anyway.
They don't check anything really. Multiple dupes, ten-year-old stories resubmitted, obvious bogus stories, etc, etc. Offences against grammar are the least (but still irritating) of their sins.
3 "decent" fails actually.
The tit size and penis length parts are probably unreliable. The names, addresses and credit card numbers (since it's a pay site) must be real.
People have been asking that FOR 20 FUCKING YEARS
===========
http://www.f-secure.com/v-desc...
Virus:W32/Concept
Virus:W97M/Concept also known as Word Prank Macro or WW6Macro - is a macro virus which has been written with the Microsoft Word v6.x macro language. It has been reported in several countries, and seems to have no trouble propagating in the wild.
WM/Concept used to be extremely widespread during 1995-1997.
===========
I remember back in 2000, my boss asking "How do I run this "I Love You" macro someone sent me?"
Word macros were cool and useful, until Microsoft decided it was clever to embed them in the document.
And they did the same fucking thing with "Windows Media"
And USB autoexec
Always prioritising some gimmicky shit that allowed advertisers to push crap over security, and allowed any asshole to take over your PC by getting you to open a document or media file.
.
"And really, if you're going to start blaming the automobile for every bad thing that's happened in the 20th" Fuck off with your straw man arguments.
"Did we have wars before the automobile? Yes? Then you have no case. Utterly silly."
I didn't say ALL wars were about oil, FFS.
What did I actually say?
"Hundreds of billions in wars to secure access to automobile fuel."
Mass transit subsidies are more obvious, but private transport is massively subsidised by the government and community. Roads, highways, bridges, tunnels, etc, etc. Hundreds of billions is spent on road infrastructure. (Some overlap here, but the great proportion is used by private cars.)
Hundreds of billions on health costs -- car accidents, air pollution.
Hundreds of billions in wars to secure access to automobile fuel.
If all the costs of private urban road transport were added up, maybe we could see which forms of transport really cost more.
If anyone wants to download a bootleg Kindle edition, you can easily find them online very shortly after publication
(And many books with no official ebook edition have homemade versions of varying quality as well.)
Most Kindle books are 500kB or so, less than a hi res scan of a page.
So this scan/print/sign/register/download method is much more work than what you can already do now.
You can call them "shit" if you want, but then you would have to acknowledge that the theory and history of economics is shit, because that's what I'm referring to. I studied this "shit", dude, in pretty exhausting detail.
You are the one who declares everything different from the US system is shit. That everyone must accept your definitions of socialism, communism, capitalism, constitution.
Political philosophy evolves. It isn't frozen with whatever the first famous person to write a book about it said.
Studying exhaustively doesn't mean you are impartial. I see far many people here with a wealth of detailed knowledge they use to support their prejudices.
I know socialists and they don't believe what you insist they do. I know communists and they are mostly good, altruistic people. But I know what would happen should they get real power.
I was using Marx's definition of Socialism.
Marx isn't Mohammed. He doesn't define "socialism" for everyone now, if he ever did, and certainly few if any socialists I know would defer to his definition. Any Marxists still around hate socialists more than anyone else for not being pure enough.
Maybe I should have used "democratic socialism" which is what most current socialists profess.
Anyway, you haven't actually cited any sources, just invoked some names.
Not under one Constitution, which is what I referred to.
Fine. Enabling you to just completely ignore any country, like most of Europe, that didn't follow your exact historical progression and evolved their constitutions rather than creating them in a dramatic event.
Communism -- true Communism, by the very definition of what Communism is -- has no government. Name me one country in written history that qualifies.
That was the final stage, which of course was never attained. Many though did have quite idyllic "all for one and one for all" periods of altruistic government for a short time after the revolution, until the assholes started manoeuvring for power.
Anyway, I wouldn't care about your silly word games except you are using them to say every form of government except your own is shit. A sadly common insular American attitude.
Presumably this is some weird American definition, not used by anyone who actually is a socialist.
And I know that there are plenty of corrupt oligarchies that name themselves "socialist". Same as the many countries, like North Korea, that label themselves as "Democratic" don't make the idea invalid.
Parliamentary democracy has lasted well over a millennium (e.g. Iceland continuously since the 10th C) and is doing fine, thanks.
Well, there have, but within a decade of attaining power they all become juntas or oligarchies or even monarchies (North Korea again). Sadly communism is too idealistic about human nature and doesn't have the checks and balances to stop power crazy psychopaths from taking control. Your constitution was written to prevent excessive concentration of power, and is fairly effective at that, frustrating as it is for zealots on either side. But it's not the only workable way to do it.
DHCP lets you log into the printer and configure a static IP, then reboot it. Better than having it locked on an IP outside the range you use in your LAN, or that duplicates an existing device.
That would be replacing thousands of elephant genes with identical, possibly damaged, mammoth genes, instead of just the few that are different.