Slashdot Mirror


User: hkmwbz

hkmwbz's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
4,812
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 4,812

  1. Re:Exonerated? on Climate Researchers Fight Back · · Score: 1

    What on earth are you talking about?

  2. Re:Is there anything they won't mock? on Extremists Warn South Park Creators Over Muhammad In a Bear Suit · · Score: 1

    What minorities did they insult? Islam and Catholicism are certainly not minorities.

  3. Re:Is there anything they won't mock? on Extremists Warn South Park Creators Over Muhammad In a Bear Suit · · Score: 1

    I'm not saying that nothing is worthy of respect. I'm saying that Muhammad isn't. In my opinion, of course.

  4. Re:The literal answer on What Will the Browser Look Like In Five Years? · · Score: 1

    The UI isn't changing randomly. It's improving over time. You are whining because Opera is making the product more usable to more people. Quite pathetic.

  5. Re:Are climate researchers.... on Climate Researchers Fight Back · · Score: 1

    You are wrong. No data sets are missing. Stop spreading lies.

  6. Re:Who exactly is fighting back? on Climate Researchers Fight Back · · Score: 1
    Are you completely retarded? What about the IPCC? They consistently use the term "global warming".

    Scientists still call it global warming. You are just a disgusting liar and a fucking moron who willfully rejects facts.

    You are trying to make it sound like scientists aren't sure about global warming, so they call it something else. But the fact is that global warming is an observed fact, and it's still called that. It's a change of the climate (climate change), specifically global warming.

    Now stop being a dishonest asshole and STFU.

  7. Re:Exonerated? on Climate Researchers Fight Back · · Score: 1

    No, they didn't lose anything. You are thinking about the "raw data deleted" nonsense, which is in fact just another lie. A small part of a local copy of some raw data was deleted to save space when moving. But the original raw data was still at the place they licensed it from. So no, they haven't lost anything.

  8. Re:Facebook on Facebook and the "Social Graph" · · Score: 1

    I think the point was that to date we have spent millions of years evolving to maximize our face to face social interactions.

    Tell that to people with social phobia.

    The relatively instant replacement of that with "social networks" is not something that we have evolved to cope with, and so has a disruptive effect on our lives and social interactions

    How?

  9. Re:A closer look at the claim and the suit on Climate Researchers Fight Back · · Score: 1

    Did you read the PDF? He quotes the National Post itself.

  10. Re:Who exactly is fighting back? on Climate Researchers Fight Back · · Score: 1

    Stop being a fucking moron. Stop mindlessly parroting right-wing denialist propaganda. The "clouds are not taken into account" nonsense was refuted ages ago. Now fuck off.

  11. Re:Are climate researchers.... on Climate Researchers Fight Back · · Score: 1

    You are a fucking moron. The "raw data deleted" nonsense is based on the fact that a small part of a local copy was deleted to save space as they were moving. The original raw data is still where they licensed it from. You fucking moron.

  12. Re:Who exactly is fighting back? on Climate Researchers Fight Back · · Score: 1

    Morons like the GP will resort to vulgar insults

    The irony. But idiot denialists have always been hypocrites.

  13. Re:Are climate researchers.... on Climate Researchers Fight Back · · Score: 1

    Missing data sets are still a worry however.

    No data sets are missing.

  14. Re:Who exactly is fighting back? on Climate Researchers Fight Back · · Score: 1

    You are an idiot too. He made the claim that they stopped calling it Global Warming, which is a blatant lie. It shouldn't even be necessary to provide links showing that scientists are referring to it as Global Warming. That's how much of a moron he is.

  15. Re:Who exactly is fighting back? on Climate Researchers Fight Back · · Score: 1

    No, you are an idiot for making the false claim that "they are switching to Climate Change". People who call you an idiot will tell you that you are an idiot because they have always called it Climate Change and Global Warming. They have not stopped calling it Global Warming. Now fuck off please.

  16. Re:inevitable... on Climate Researchers Fight Back · · Score: 1

    Read about what? Yet another disgusting denialist liar lying through his teeth? Wow.

  17. Re:Exonerated? on Climate Researchers Fight Back · · Score: 1

    Yes, their results are reproducible. The evidence clearly shows that global warming is happening. Quit being a fucking idiot.

  18. Re:Who exactly is fighting back? on Climate Researchers Fight Back · · Score: -1, Troll

    No, you fucking idiotic moron of a right-wing denialist cunt, they know very well how to add clouds into the mixture. You fucking ignorant moron.

  19. Re:Who exactly is fighting back? on Climate Researchers Fight Back · · Score: 0, Troll

    I lost faith in the climatologists when they stopped calling it global warming and went for the more neutral "climate change."

    You are a fucking moron. How stupid can you get? Are you even able to open doors with your fucked up brain? They are still calling it global warming, you fucking douchebag.

    Also, how the hell can they use data that seems to work for centuries "tree rings" and then STOP using it when it doesn't support their conclusions over the past few decades ie the whole Hide the Decline Fiasco.

    Maybe if you spent more time using your brain and educating yourself, and less time being a fucking moron, you would have gotten it by now. You fucking idiot.

  20. Re:Are climate researchers.... on Climate Researchers Fight Back · · Score: 1

    Yet the media is not reporting on the raw data as the raw data was deleted.

    This is of course a blatant lie from a batshit insane climate denialist.

    Personally I am a bit skeptical of the man made climate change theory.

    That is because you are a batshit insane climate denialist and a liar, and you will automatically reject all proper facts.

    As they say, "follow the money."

    Yes, you fucking moron, please do that. And realize that the anti-AGW crap you are spewing is made up by powerful corporations that are spending millions to get fucking morons like you to spread their blatant lies for them. You fucking moron.

  21. Re:Ultimately on Climate Researchers Fight Back · · Score: 1

    Forget that these scientists have zero large-scale, successful predictive models, and only a few models were sporadically successful out of thousands of localized tests.

    Pure and utter nonsense. Stop spreading your blatant lies, you fucking moron.

  22. Re:I don't see the relevance... on Climate Researchers Fight Back · · Score: 1

    You are talking nonsense. You are the one with the black and white debate.

  23. Re:I don't see the relevance... on Climate Researchers Fight Back · · Score: 1
    Denialist crap is denialist crap. Educate yourself:

    http://www.skepticalscience.com/medieval-warm-period.htm

    http://www.skepticalscience.com/Was-there-a-Medieval-Warm-Period.html

  24. Re:That Old Tune? on Climate Researchers Fight Back · · Score: 1

    Ah, so I suppose the 650 climatologists who spoke out against the IPCC report at the Climate Summit last January don't understand all this fancy "science" stuff, huh?

    Exactly. Who are these 650 "climatologists"?

  25. Re:A closer look at the claim and the suit on Climate Researchers Fight Back · · Score: 1

    I read the PDF, and it turned out to be a conscious and organized effort by the NP to crush Weaver. He will win.