Slashdot Mirror


User: 42forty-two42

42forty-two42's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
1,149
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 1,149

  1. Obligatory crossover on Barcodes: The Number of the Beast · · Score: 2, Interesting

    What about Star wars in ASCII in barcode?

  2. Re:Whiny little.. on Mozilla and BitTorrent? · · Score: 1

    Good point, but (AFAIK) the protocol dosen't specify how to get .torrents from the trackers.

  3. Re:The only problem with Ogg on AAC vs. OGG vs. MP3 · · Score: 1

    I don't know about the encoder per se, but is your ripping program slowing the actual read of the audio data by forcing it to go at the same rate as the encode? It should do the two in parallel, but not slow the rip by the decode.

  4. Re:OffTopic? on Mozilla and BitTorrent? · · Score: 2, Insightful
    A P2P client which BTW has the capacity of being the next Napster
    ...only it can't be searched, and each torrent has a centralized point of failure. I don't think so.
  5. Re:what's so great about bittorrent? on Mozilla and BitTorrent? · · Score: 1
    [...] and I don't see much content using this at all. I got my Red Hat ISOs from Red Hat with no problem.
    The example you used (the red het ISOs) is irrelevant. Bittorrent only works if people are still using the torrent - if nobody's using it, there's nowhere to download it from. Wait for the next distro release.
    [...] why it uses an out-of-band .torrent file instead of some other communications protocol that replaces http.
    I don't see any analysis of why I might want to "donate" my bandwidth to some person I don't know, or why I should expect bandwidth from anyone except the person I'm downloading from. Because it works faster. If you don't want to donate bandwith, then you're only slowing the network. The network will then shun you, as that kind of behavior is detrimental to the speed of the network.
  6. Re:Bit Torrent is great on Mozilla and BitTorrent? · · Score: 1
    One thing that pisses me off, however, is that every time I want to download something with bit torrent I have to open up Internet Explorer.
    Save the .torrent to disk, open your bittorrent client.
  7. Re:Why BitTorrent? on Mozilla and BitTorrent? · · Score: 1
    Finally, how exactly do they know what the total bandwidth of distributing RH9 via BitTorrent was?
    A central server keeps track of who's uploading/downloading what - it can easily count the amount of data transmitted.
  8. Re:Whiny little.. on Mozilla and BitTorrent? · · Score: 1
    Ideally, they'd be linked with torrent://.
    Wrong. The torrent:// URL would have to include the *data* of the torrent. Would you want URLs a few kb long?
  9. Section bar on Announcing Games.slashdot.org · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Will this be added to the Section bar on the right-hand side?

  10. Re:Clearly Parody, But.... on Penny Arcade vs. American Greetings Revisited · · Score: 5, Informative

    Well, if slashdot posted a direct link to the donations page...

  11. Re:Time to block AOL from my little mail server on AOL Blocks Telstra Bigpond Mail · · Score: 1

    Personally, I'd do it with procmail - you could more easily return a message that dosen't look like a bounce, and thus isn't ignored by the typical AOL luser.

  12. Re:Proxies & broken e-mail on Spamming Trojan "Proxy Guzu" · · Score: 1

    There's no good way to prevent this. If a new company gets a domain name, should they have to wait for every sysadmin in the world to mark their key trusted before they can send email? If so, sysadmins will disable the functionality. If not, the problem isn't solved and better than the blacklists do it.

  13. Re:Proxies & broken e-mail on Spamming Trojan "Proxy Guzu" · · Score: 3, Insightful
    Let's face it: SMTP is broken and it needs to be fixed. There has to be some way of authenticating senders and attachments to messages?

    There is - it's called PGP. SMTP is only intended to transport mail, not to authenticate it. It's the client's job to determine if it should be accepted.
  14. About docking station on Linux Gaming after Loki · · Score: 1

    It's possible to hack DS to work without the servers: Use the login disabler at http://mainframe.chani3.com/

  15. Re:So, what now? on Keith Packard's Xfree86 Fork Officially Started · · Score: 1
    I don't mind using a binary driver provided and supported by a manufacturer for their product, rather than being totally unable to use their product because of the lack of an open-source driver.
    I don't buy the product.
    Maybe you don't, but most people do. And unless those people get their drivers, they won't use linux. Once there's enough market share, Linux can reject binary drivers and the manufacturers will have to provide OS drivers - but for the moment there's just no reason for the manufacturers to release OS drivers, and without the binary drivers there will never be an OS driver.
  16. Come on, Mr. Baumann on Translucent Windows for X using OpenGL · · Score: 2, Funny

    We know you submitted the article. If you want hardware, why didn't you just say so?

  17. Re:Under-exagerated the participant on Worlds Largest Computer Party, In Progress · · Score: 1

    So, 1,234.5 becomes 1.234,5?

  18. Re:I don't think we can be too critical, actually. on Weekly Microsoft Critical Security Issue · · Score: 1

    Only Microcode bugs really affect everyone. Not everyone has BIOS, a kernel, and not everyone has Windows installed by default.

  19. Re:wow on AIM Meets Social Network Theory · · Score: 0
    You dirty lying /.ers - YOU ALL ARE RUNNING AOL!
    Not all of us.
  20. Re:No problem on AOL Bans Mail From DSL-Hosted Servers · · Score: 1

    I'd block Korean IPs, but I don't know what ranges to enter.

  21. Re:Aka "Pgp Key signing party" on OpenPGP Meetup · · Score: 1

    The key ID is the last 8 hex digits of the fingerprint, so you don't need to verify that.

  22. Re:Microsoft is Smart about Licensing on Windows Media Format Could Hit Linux-Based Devices · · Score: 1

    Opendivx then. Or libavcodec.

  23. Re:heh? on Have You Really Read Your ISP's TOS? · · Score: 1
    But in reality, what people in their right mind would do that? I mean, assuming: The hacker was benevolent and wanted the 6 monthes. If you hacked the system - you have unlimited, forever usage of the system, hence the word "0wnz," I believe?
    No, the sysadmins boot from Knoppix or something, do some forensics and haul you into jail while restoring from backups.
  24. Not a problem on Have You Really Read Your ISP's TOS? · · Score: 1

    I have a server not in the dynamic range - I can relay off it. Interestingly, ORDB's mail server rejects my 24.25 IP, but it's not listed in their open relay list...

  25. Re:Kinda OT: NAT/PAT on Have You Really Read Your ISP's TOS? · · Score: 1

    If you check the sequence number for fragmented IP packets you can count it. There was an article some time ago about it.