lol. Well, it *was* on SpamCop earlier today.
And we had some bounces because of it.
Apr 26 14:20:17 mail2 sm-mta[21597]: ruleset=check_relay, arg1=imo-d05.mx.aol.com, arg2=205.188.157.37, relay=imo-d05.mx.aol.com [205.188.157.37], reject=553 5.3.0 Spam blocked see: http://spamcop.net/bl.shtml?205.188.157.37
Hey now. Take it easy on my brother thedillybar. Maybe he's running a disto that doesn't use (the frequent security issue know as) PAM. Maybe rather than being able to spend the time on putting LDAP into place he's doing more important things like trying to stop spam or doing customer work that his company gets paid MONEY to do. Heck, he might even be running Tru64 UNIX.
Sorry, it just kinda irks me to see people talking about how great LDAP is and how freakin' easy it is to implement when they have no idea of the situation.
lol. Well, it *was* on SpamCop earlier today. And we had some bounces because of it. Apr 26 14:20:17 mail2 sm-mta[21597]: ruleset=check_relay, arg1=imo-d05.mx.aol.com, arg2=205.188.157.37, relay=imo-d05.mx.aol.com [205.188.157.37], reject=553 5.3.0 Spam blocked see: http://spamcop.net/bl.shtml?205.188.157.37
AOL is listed on SpamCop too. http://www.spamcop.net/w3m?action=checkblock&ip=20 5.188.157.37
And he's providing her the medicine that is causing her hallucinations. :)
Sorry, it just kinda irks me to see people talking about how great LDAP is and how freakin' easy it is to implement when they have no idea of the situation.