maria qaunsett posts all over the internet with the title or words "Converting to Linux was a disaster for my company." check the title of the first link.
* don't believe everything you read - even on slashdot! *
Netscape was about to go bankrupt, but AOL bought them, presumably to use Gecko for the next version of AOL. Microsoft worried that allowing Gecko to be adopted widely would make Windows a less valuable brand, and worked to keep AOL from switching, promising the online service provider free ad space on the Windows desktop in exchange for using the Internet Explorer rendering engine.
ummm... what? beyond the random typos and other misinformation in this article - i thought it was generally accepted at the time that AOL bought Netscape for their "portal" (which had one of the highest hit-rates at that time, right?) - not the browser technology.
and if i remember correctly, the aol/windows agreement predates aol buying netscape by years and years...
you need to read the article that was posted to understand the comment. the screenshot does not show that the comment follows the format of the posting.
why you got modded "insightful", when you obviously have not "rtfa", i'm not sure.
Well, i work in a medium/large sized business that distributes content over the internet. Selling the *content* generates the revenue that pays the bills. A large part of that bill is paying developers to write code for the "content delivery system". The "content delivery system" runs on linux, apache, java, and assorted other open source projects. When one of the assorted open source projects doesn't do something we want the way we want it, we write a patch and submit it. That's how the people i know make money off of writing open source code.
As a server/client running on a unix system, i think openssh is a much better alternative. It is easy to install, configure, and manage. We have been using openssh as a default for over a year now.
As a windows client, openssh does not even have an option. you have to find and alternative, and none of them (IMHO) even compare - especially since i couldn't find one that had a decent sftp interface like the commercial version.
Just my.02
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,265982,00.html
this article?t _rates_pay_off
http://www.maximumpc.com/article/do_higher_mp3_bi
This guy turned his santa into a kicking hangman http://www.hauntershangout.com/home/santahangman.a sp
Quick correction (from wikipedia)
"Every Google engineer is encouraged to spend 20 percent (20%) of their work time
on projects that interest them"
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Google
just watched this last night from PBS's Nova ScienceNowt ml
http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/sciencenow/3214/02.h
http://www.google.com/search?lr=&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8 &q=Maria%20Quansett
maria qaunsett posts all over the internet with the title or words "Converting to Linux was a disaster for my company." check the title of the first link.
* don't believe everything you read - even on slashdot! *
http://radaol-prod-web-rr.streamops.aol.com/radio/ radioclient/usbb/html/sorry.html
Attention Firefox Users:
Currently AOL Radio does not support Firefox. Please come back next month, when Firefox support will be available.
use mplayerplug-in. the streams work fine for me:
http://mplayerplug-in.sourceforge.net/
here's the page that OpenRAW points to, to describe RAW:s tanding-series/u-raw-files.shtml
http://www.luminous-landscape.com/tutorials/under
and if i remember correctly, the aol/windows agreement predates aol buying netscape by years and years
not sure whether it's firefox or the html, but here's the actual link to the archived video of the testimony
a m
http://hsgac.senate.gov/audio_video/052505video.r
http://www.google.com/help/features.html
i use the calculator most
you need to read the article that was posted to understand the comment. the screenshot does not show that the comment follows the format of the posting.
why you got modded "insightful", when you obviously have not "rtfa", i'm not sure.
Well, i work in a medium/large sized business that distributes content over the internet. Selling the *content* generates the revenue that pays the bills. A large part of that bill is paying developers to write code for the "content delivery system". The "content delivery system" runs on linux, apache, java, and assorted other open source projects. When one of the assorted open source projects doesn't do something we want the way we want it, we write a patch and submit it. That's how the people i know make money off of writing open source code.
Most likely, trying to install LinuxBIOS or OpenBIOS over the "trusted computing" component would present a violation of the DMCA.
As a server/client running on a unix system, i think openssh is a much better alternative. It is easy to install, configure, and manage. We have been using openssh as a default for over a year now. As a windows client, openssh does not even have an option. you have to find and alternative, and none of them (IMHO) even compare - especially since i couldn't find one that had a decent sftp interface like the commercial version. Just my .02