> "log in and see content relevant to your interest"
That sure as hell sounds like creating echo chambers to me - which is exactly the opposite of what is needed for meaningful discourse. The latter is what Twitter *should* be promoting if it actually cares one iota about abuse and misinformation, but of course it doesn't; it just cares about talking the talk so it can continue raking in ad money.
But Libertarians hate to admit to those, as they are natural market failure mechanisms, and they don't like to admit that the market can have inherent failure modes.
It's not so much as they won't admit to problems as they can't. Because if they admit to one, they admit to all, and the foundations of libertarianism are really fucking shaky, even for a theoretical system of government.
Because white nationalists aren't aiming to make a whites-only nation. I seem to remember a guy who wanted to do that around 1940, just can't remember his name.
You apologists would be adorable for your inability to exhibit basic logic, if the fact that you're allowed to vote wasn't so terrifying.
Whenever someone makes a remarkable claim and cites GlobalResearch, they are almost certainly wrong.
Here's an unpopular opinion for you: the USSR collapsed because the foundations behind its facade had rotted beyond their ability to support said facade, and the fallout from that collapse are still being felt today.
After which, the apologists show up to defend appalling behaviour by claiming "it's just joke bro".
Tell you what, I'll shoot you in your face and tell you I'm trolling you, and we'll see how you feel about that.
If you wear the Klan hood for any reason, you are a shit human being who deserves to experience exactly the kind of vile things that the Klan wants to do to non-white people.
Capitalism at its finest: create an industry that doesn't need to exist, so that said industry can get rich by taking taxpayers' money, and convincing useful idiots like yourself that perpetuating said industry is the best option "because it creates jerbs". What the fuck is a luddite like you doing on a technology website?
You're the one making bullshit conspiracy theorist claims that make you sound like a Stallman sockpuppet, so I think the onus is on you to prove you understand computer security, as opposed to being online Linux fanboy #10554546.
If any of that was possible within the current political climate, it would already have been done. Fact is that unless you've got enough money to have your name up in lights often enough to remind people to vote for you, you ain't gonna get their votes. And the only way to get that money, is by selling out.
The American Dream in its final, purest form. Welcome to rampant capitalism.
And you're dishonest. No corporation is going to produce a more efficient vehicle, because it costs money to do that research which eats into their profit. This is why governments need to exist, why government regulations need to exist, and why libertarianism is nonsense: it is necessary to force companies to do the right thing.
Unfortunately, when you get corrupt governments that abuse this power to benefit themselves, you have a problem. But I wonder who the libertarians voted for in 2016, hmmm?
This auto-reboot idiocy is the single biggest reason why people *and enterprises* are avoiding Windows 10. You've had how many fucking years to get kernel hotswapping updating working, and you haven't done it, and now you need it and your solution is to force people to reboot? That's just plain idiotic.
Just put the damn updater back to Windows 7's model - you know, the one where it asks you first - and we can stop this stupidity. Is it really that difficult? Seriously?
If you don't fix this bloody mess you are never going to get the adoption you want, it's that simple. Come 2020, when Win7 goes EOL, I can forsee a number of very painful legal challenges as Win10 is the only upgrade option but it could easily be construed as not fit for purpose due to its rebooting nonsense.
Just FIX IT, Microsoft. Why is that too much to ask?
- a Windows user since 98 SE who is very very tired of Microsoft's bullshit around what used to be their best product
Manned rocketry involves attaching humans to what is essentially a controlled explosion. There is always going to be a risk in this, regardless of when you trigger that explosion.
Slashdot Mirror
> "log in and see content relevant to your interest"
That sure as hell sounds like creating echo chambers to me - which is exactly the opposite of what is needed for meaningful discourse. The latter is what Twitter *should* be promoting if it actually cares one iota about abuse and misinformation, but of course it doesn't; it just cares about talking the talk so it can continue raking in ad money.
To be fair, those replaceable cogs aren't in Silicon Valley, they're in India or various other cheap third-world countries.
A person who doesn't understand basic grammar (hint: it's "your" possessive, not "you are" contraction) calling someone else ignorant. Classic.
The descent will stop once most people stop thinking that way and realize that they're all Americans even if they may hold different viewpoints.
So never, in other words.
But Libertarians hate to admit to those, as they are natural market failure mechanisms, and they don't like to admit that the market can have inherent failure modes.
It's not so much as they won't admit to problems as they can't. Because if they admit to one, they admit to all, and the foundations of libertarianism are really fucking shaky, even for a theoretical system of government.
Because white nationalists aren't aiming to make a whites-only nation. I seem to remember a guy who wanted to do that around 1940, just can't remember his name.
You apologists would be adorable for your inability to exhibit basic logic, if the fact that you're allowed to vote wasn't so terrifying.
https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Globalresearch
Here's an unpopular opinion for you: the USSR collapsed because the foundations behind its facade had rotted beyond their ability to support said facade, and the fallout from that collapse are still being felt today.
After which, the apologists show up to defend appalling behaviour by claiming "it's just joke bro". Tell you what, I'll shoot you in your face and tell you I'm trolling you, and we'll see how you feel about that.
If you wear the Klan hood for any reason, you are a shit human being who deserves to experience exactly the kind of vile things that the Klan wants to do to non-white people.
And the problem is that Trumpanzees like you don't possess the cranial capacity to consider *why* that association is made.
We really shouldn't use Texas laws as anything like an example for the rest of the country.
They are very useful as an example of what *not* to do!
Capitalism at its finest: create an industry that doesn't need to exist, so that said industry can get rich by taking taxpayers' money, and convincing useful idiots like yourself that perpetuating said industry is the best option "because it creates jerbs". What the fuck is a luddite like you doing on a technology website?
You're the one making bullshit conspiracy theorist claims that make you sound like a Stallman sockpuppet, so I think the onus is on you to prove you understand computer security, as opposed to being online Linux fanboy #10554546.
BUT
HER
EMAILS
If any of that was possible within the current political climate, it would already have been done. Fact is that unless you've got enough money to have your name up in lights often enough to remind people to vote for you, you ain't gonna get their votes. And the only way to get that money, is by selling out. The American Dream in its final, purest form. Welcome to rampant capitalism.
So verifiable facts are straws now? That does go a long way to explain how the GOP continues to appeal to its voters...
Except that's not what the article is about. Perhaps you should consider returning to school, since you evidently failed reading comprehension.
When did Slashdot become filled with right-wing Trump lover dipshits who try to discredit factual reporting by playing the "partisan politics" card?
ES is currently on version 6 and v7 is in beta. If you are still running version 1, you deserve anything that happens to you.
No, airlines are not "trailing" VR. I believe you meant "trialling".
> Therefore your entire premise is wrong.
And you're dishonest. No corporation is going to produce a more efficient vehicle, because it costs money to do that research which eats into their profit. This is why governments need to exist, why government regulations need to exist, and why libertarianism is nonsense: it is necessary to force companies to do the right thing.
Unfortunately, when you get corrupt governments that abuse this power to benefit themselves, you have a problem. But I wonder who the libertarians voted for in 2016, hmmm?
This auto-reboot idiocy is the single biggest reason why people *and enterprises* are avoiding Windows 10. You've had how many fucking years to get kernel hotswapping updating working, and you haven't done it, and now you need it and your solution is to force people to reboot? That's just plain idiotic.
Just put the damn updater back to Windows 7's model - you know, the one where it asks you first - and we can stop this stupidity. Is it really that difficult? Seriously?
If you don't fix this bloody mess you are never going to get the adoption you want, it's that simple. Come 2020, when Win7 goes EOL, I can forsee a number of very painful legal challenges as Win10 is the only upgrade option but it could easily be construed as not fit for purpose due to its rebooting nonsense.
Just FIX IT, Microsoft. Why is that too much to ask?
- a Windows user since 98 SE who is very very tired of Microsoft's bullshit around what used to be their best product
*sniff* *sniff* I smell a libertarian.
You eternally-Microsoft-blaming mouth breathers are as bad as Republicans who blame Obama.
Manned rocketry involves attaching humans to what is essentially a controlled explosion. There is always going to be a risk in this, regardless of when you trigger that explosion.