Slashdot Mirror


Why Car Salesmen Don't Want To Sell Electric Cars

HughPickens.com writes: Matt Richtel writes in the NYT that one big reason there are only about 330,000 electric vehicles on the road is that car dealers show little enthusiasm for putting consumers into electric cars. Industry insiders say that electric vehicles do not offer dealers the same profits as gas-powered cars, they take more time to sell because of the explaining required, and electric vehicles may require less maintenance, undermining the biggest source of dealer profits — their service departments. Some electric car buyers have said they felt as if they were the ones doing the selling. Chelsea Dell made an appointment to test-drive a used Volt but when she arrived, she said, a salesman told her that the car hadn't been washed, and that he had instead readied a less expensive, gas-powered car. "I was ready to pull the trigger, and they were trying to muscle me into a Chevy Sonic," says Dell. "The thing I was baffled at was that the Volt was a lot more expensive." Marc Deutsch, Nissan's business development manager for electric vehicles says some salespeople just can't rationalize the time it takes to sell the cars. A salesperson "can sell two gas burners in less than it takes to sell a Leaf," Deutsch says. "It's a lot of work for a little pay."

Jared Allen says that service is crucial to dealer profits and that dealers didn't want to push consumers into electric cars that might make them less inclined to return for service. Maybe that helps explains the experience of Robert Kast, who last year leased a Volkswagen e-Golf from a local dealer. He said the salesman offered him a $15-per-month maintenance package that included service for oil changes, belt repair and water pumps. "I said: 'You know it doesn't have any of those things,'" Mr. Kast recalled. He said the salesman excused himself to go confirm this with his manager. Of the whole experience, Mr. Kast, 61, said: "I knew a whole lot more about the car than anyone in the building." "Until selling a plug-in electric car is as quick and easy as selling any other vehicle that nets the dealer the same profit, many dealers will avoid them, for very logical and understandable reasons," says John Voelker. "That means that the appropriate question should be directed to makers of electric cars: What are you doing to make selling electric cars as profitable and painless for your dealers as selling gasoline or diesel vehicles?"

482 comments

  1. Easy solution by viperidaenz · · Score: 5, Insightful

    If dealers don't want to sell them, let manufacturers sell direct to the customers.

    1. Re: Easy solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ++ this

    2. Re:Easy solution by Chris+Mattern · · Score: 5, Funny

      ..except that the dealers have made that illegal, for the most part. For our protection, of course.

    3. Re:Easy solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Which state might that be?

    4. Re: Easy solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pick any state of Australia you like.

    5. Re:Easy solution by Irate+Engineer · · Score: 5, Interesting

      This +100.

      Dealers need to step aside and get out of the fucking way of the sale. It's a stupid business model. There is no value in having a middleman in this process anymore.

      Put a firm price tag on the damned vehicle along with a spec sheet - haggling over the price of the of an expensive item like a car like you are in some Algerian bazaar pisses people off. Have an attendant handle the keys and accompany road tests. Done.

      I'll never go to a chain dealership to buy a car. I've bought my last several cars off lease from a used car seller who puts a price tag on the car, and simply hands you the keys for a road test and asks that you have the car back by closing time. Their prices are good because they don't have to pay a bunch of salespeople to play fucking mind games with customers all damned day, and they have good sales volume. They have an awesome local reputation.

      --

      Left MS Windows for Linux Mint and never looked back!

      Vote for Bernie in 2016!

    6. Re:Easy solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      Sweet. I'll tell my boss that I'm quitting to move to another state, because some retard online said it's not retarded.

    7. Re:Easy solution by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 1

      If there were merely no value, it'd be an improvement. Not only does the dealership take its cut; the buyer has to interact with a car salesman, a definite negative-value-added experience.

    8. Re:Easy solution by Firethorn · · Score: 4, Informative

      Which state would that be, as the ACs mention?
      From wiki:

      In the United States, direct manufacturer auto sales are prohibited in almost every state by franchise laws requiring that new cars be sold only by dealers.

      Customer Experience
      According to one survey, more than half of dealership customers would prefer to buy directly from the manufacturer, without any monetary incentives to do so. An analyst report of a direct sales model is estimated to cut the cost of a vehicle by 8.6%.[11] This implies an even greater demand currently exists for a direct manufacturer sales model. However, state laws in the United States prohibit manufacturers from selling directly, and customers must buy through a dealer.

      --
      I don't read AC A human right
    9. Re: Easy solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Isn't Australia that place made up of the descendants of criminals which has draconian censorship laws and doesn't even allow people to carry around small pocketknives?

    10. Re: Easy solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well at some point someone somewhere has to stock the cars on a lot, keep them washed, etc... And handle the paperwork.

    11. Re:Easy solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But ... but ... how will the user ever pick out the color they want for the optional $100 floor mats?

    12. Re: Easy solution by rickb928 · · Score: 1

      Australia isn't very welcoming to immigrants right now.

      --
      deleting the extra space after periods so i can stay relevant, yeah.
    13. Re:Easy solution by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 3, Informative

      Which state might that be?

      California. I live in San Jose, and my wife bought her Tesla direct from the factory in Fremont. We didn't pay a dime to any dealer.

    14. Re:Easy solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Its not a stupid business model by any means
      You forgot that the US didn't invented the car, they invented the business model, in plain English it means the land of the opportunity where any old world delinquent could get rich milking the unaware
      basically the manufacturer makes the car and makes deals with the dealer that will make money of parts and maintenance for a mint on the condition that the dealer push the brand by any trick available and in return the manufacturers make sure the customers are milked regularly during the life of the product while trying to make the life of any independent traders and competitors difficult
      Win for the manufacturers win for the dealers fuck the customers, "we do know what the customers need and want because the customers are clueless, they want what we say they want and that is that"
      A honest car with a engine that last for a million miles with out maintenance and that doesn't even require oil changes is not going to entice a bunch of crocks accustomed for decades to a business model of treating the clients as if they where their own long life personal accounts because that was the only choice available

    15. Re: Easy solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fuck that. I'm not picking up and moving because the car dealers have bought off my legislature.

      You move.

    16. Re: Easy solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The boat people managed to get ashore in 1788. So it's doable...

    17. Re: Easy solution by Man+On+Pink+Corner · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Like the Australian state that just criminalized possession of CAD files?

      Or the one that criminalizes video games?

      Or the one that criminalizes porn actresses with A cups?

      Australia is not the first country that comes to mind when "sane lawmaking" is the topic of discussion.

    18. Re: Easy solution by jtownatpunk.net · · Score: 2

      Don't forget that everything that moves and half the stuff that doesn't is deadly.

    19. Re:Easy solution by whoever57 · · Score: 1

      Which state would that be, as the ACs mention?

      California. As well as not banning direct sales by auto manufacturers, it provides more protections for employees (banning non-compete contract terms), limits on how short yellow lights can be at signals, and the state government is running a surplus.

      --
      The real "Libtards" are the Libertarians!
    20. Re:Easy solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He said the salesman offered him a $15-per-month maintenance package that included service for oil changes, belt repair and water pumps. "I said: 'You know it doesn't have any of those things,'" Mr. Kast recalled.

      Manufacturers need to step aside and bring prices down. With way fewer components than an ICE car, electric cars should cost much less. Yet the greedy car makers are charging more than an ICE car, go figure. The cost per mile for an electric car should be very less and that goes for road taxes as well.

    21. Re:Easy solution by youngone · · Score: 1
      I imagine that's what will happen, because if people want to buy these, then someone will sell them. If it's not the current dealers, it'll be someone else.

      That means that the appropriate question should be directed to makers of electric cars: What are you doing to make selling electric cars as profitable and painless for your dealers as selling gasoline or diesel vehicles?"

      Is the bit of stupid I noticed because that's not how the world works.

    22. Re: Easy solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Gees, some of you are dense. No, dealers, owners, and salesmen. They haven't figured out a way to monetize it yet. And yes owners, there is oil needed for your volt. And the salesman knows it. Plus there are other service necessities the overpriced device needs. Ac is direct drive? Have bearings, they need lubed, tires need nitro filled? Etc? So don't blame the salesmen, or the dealer for trying to sell, that's their job, a holding pen where you can go and choose a vehicle, an old fashioned cattle auction. Usually the warranty is an attempt to put a profit to the sale. Just remember, that's their job, its your option, public transport, or buy a car.

    23. Re: Easy solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The dealer does a lot more than just that. Without the dealer, who would:

      - add x% to the price and force the buyer to pretend they're considering another cheaper option before giving the innevitable discount(s) that aren't?
      - upsell you on useless crap once your thoroughly exhausted from negotiating the price down to the actual price?
      - condescendingly deride your choice in an attempt to shame you into buying "bigger, shinier, pricier, more petrol guzzling" for "just a few $$$ more"?
      - sell ripoff financing plans to the gullible and the desperate?
      - give lawyers a good name?

    24. Re:Easy solution by Luthair · · Score: 1

      I agree, I'm a programmer in my 30s and the main reason I don't own a car is I can't be bothered to deal with dealer bullshit.

    25. Re: Easy solution by dgatwood · · Score: 4, Informative

      And yes owners, there is oil needed for your volt.

      Um, no. Electric cars use permanently lubricated bearings. There's no mechanism by which the dealer can add oil to anything. Eventually, those bearings fail, and you have to replace the motor, but not for a very long time.

      Electric cars do need tire rotation, brake pad replacement, and replacement of brake lights and other exterior lights (if they aren't LEDs). Beyond that, they should be largely maintenance-free.

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    26. Re: Easy solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sure there is, the article even states it pretty clearly. The majority of their profit comes not from the sales of cars, but the rediculous markup and labor costs for the service department.

      What does a BMW or Mercedes oil change run these days ? About $150 or so ?

      Eventually, dealerships will go extinct. It's inevitable. They will, however, go down kicking and screaming the whole way.

    27. Re: Easy solution by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      Don't forget that everything that moves and half the stuff that doesn't is deadly.

      Death adders. That is all.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    28. Re:Easy solution by PopeRatzo · · Score: 4, Insightful

      California. As well as not banning direct sales by auto manufacturers, it provides more protections for employees (banning non-compete contract terms), limits on how short yellow lights can be at signals, and the state government is running a surplus.

      That's what good, conservative governance will do for you.

      Oh wait.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    29. Re:Easy solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry. California is the most fucked up, disfunctional state in the union. Just because they allow you to buy directly from Tesla doesn't offset any of the rest of their screwball laws.

    30. Re:Easy solution by _Sharp'r_ · · Score: 0

      The problem isn't that dealers don't want to sell them to anyone if they can make a profit on them, it's that customers don't want to buy them. i.e. they're 1.6% of new car purchases (leaving out trucks,minivans, suvs, etc.. just comparing to cars).

      So most sales guy's experience is that even if someone walks in wanting to ask about the latest electric car, they're really going to end up buying a gas car once they get the facts about range, battery life, etc..., so why not just sell them the gas car that makes more economical sense to them in the first place and not waste everyone's time.

      Of course, the three left-wing elitist publications linked from the summary believe they need to run everyone else's life when it comes to purchasing "green", so they just can't understand that the vast majority of people don't want to throw away their money and time on an environmental status symbol, so they blame the dealer. Glad their buddies don't control things like light bulb regulations, or we wouldn't be allowed to buy less expensive bulbs, either.... oh wait...

      --
      The party of stupid and the party of evil get together and do something both stupid and evil, then call it bipartisan.
    31. Re:Easy solution by Noah+Haders · · Score: 1

      that's all cool and stuff, but almost all car manufacturers work through the dealership model, and even if the law changed they would still go through the dealerships. so how would this help?

    32. Re:Easy solution by Noah+Haders · · Score: 2

      i had a great experience at a mazda dealership. I think they take a different approach to pricing models and sales goals. its also true that in shopping for a car i went to a number of other dealerships that were shady as fuck. generally, you can tell in 15 mins if you feel comfortable there or not. if not, just walk away (literally, in midsentance, just be like "i'm really happy for you and imma let you finish, but first i need to get something from my car")

    33. Re: Easy solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Volts have a gas generater in them.

    34. Re:Easy solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exactly. Some of the posters are right, dealerships make most of their $$$$$$ on servicing cars. Electric cars are simpler to maintain than gas powered cars, and require much less maintenance. The price of electric cars will come down and the range will increase as demand increases, and battery technology gets better, and better batteries get less expensive to manufacture. All of the laws against direct sales to customers, bypassing dealerships need to be eliminated!

      I agree that dealerships and their salesman can be very annoying! Some dealers will not sell new or used cars for cash, because they want that 22% or higher interest on financing. And they use financing to force you into buying the car that they want to sell you instead of the one that you want to buy.

      Many people would rather pay more to buy a car direct from the manufacturer and skip the dealership hassle.

    35. Re: Easy solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What, no death subtracters? I think we need to do something about this obvious inequality perpetuated by the dominant genus of the species!

    36. Re:Easy solution by fredrated · · Score: 1

      You, sir or madam coward, are a fool and an ass. Usually California is way ahead of the country.

    37. Re:Easy solution by ganjadude · · Score: 1

      this

      --
      have you seen my sig? there are many others like it but none that are the same
    38. Re:Easy solution by kangsterizer · · Score: 1

      one stone 2 birds.

    39. Re:Easy solution by nolife · · Score: 1

      There is a reason for a salesman and the tactics. To get more money from people. The amount of people they "piss off" is far less then the amount of people that have no idea what they are doing, or honestly do not care about anything other than the monthly payment. The dealers like those people and there are a lot more of them. The people that get pissed off are those that understand the system, know they are getting ripped, don;t fall for the excitement and head games and the dealers will usually not deal with that because for every smart person on the lot looking, there are 10 dumb ones. Most places, if you state you will not need financing, you have no trade in, and just want a bottom line price, will just blow you off. They know there is little to no chance you'll budge so why bother with you? You walking away does not hurt them one bit. Someone right behind you in line will pay a lot more.

      --
      Bad boys rape our young girls but Violet gives willingly.
    40. Re: Easy solution by ganjadude · · Score: 4, Informative

      a vold is not a true electric, it has a range extender (AKA an ICE)

      --
      have you seen my sig? there are many others like it but none that are the same
    41. Re:Easy solution by amiga3D · · Score: 1

      Like Tesla?

    42. Re:Easy solution by amiga3D · · Score: 1

      You've obviously never been to Mississippi.

    43. Re: Easy solution by Nos. · · Score: 1

      Except nobody said they didn't need oil in their Volt. They didn't need oil changes in the eGolf which is an electric car, not a hybrid.

    44. Re: Easy solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fuck that. I'm not picking up and moving because the car dealers have bought off my legislature.

      Then don't bitch about the laws in your state.

      You move.

      I am not seeing how that changes anything, except to make my life worse.

    45. Re: Easy solution by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 1

      You mean the country that took a boat with 178 in it that was a couple hundred feet from shore, towed it away from land, and won't say how they "disappeared" both the boat and the passengers?

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
    46. Re: Easy solution by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 1

      You forgot "sell warranties at 9x the price that they pay the 3rd party issuer that you only find out covers less than a thong when you try to make a claim."

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
    47. Re:Easy solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Costco has a decent car buying program.

      https://www.costcoauto.com/enterzipcode.aspx

    48. Re: Easy solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      "don't believe everything you read on the Internet"

      ~ Abe Lincoln

    49. Re:Easy solution by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 1

      Dealers need to step aside and get out of the fucking way of the sale. It's a stupid business model. There is no value in having a middleman in this process anymore.

      No value for ANYBODY. If this is really true:

      A salesperson "can sell two gas burners in less than it takes to sell a Leaf," Deutsch says. "It's a lot of work for a little pay."

      Then the commission on a $50,000 vehicle is way too low, and it's time the dealerships were seriously shaken up and kicked in the ass.

      Somebody is making a ton of dough, and if it's not the salesmen, then it's the bosses in the backroom. I.e., the "overhead".

    50. Re:Easy solution by kelemvor4 · · Score: 1

      Which state might that be?

      Liquid.

    51. Re: Easy solution by Jack+Griffin · · Score: 1

      As long as you get there by plane instead of boat you are fine.

    52. Re: Easy solution by Jack+Griffin · · Score: 1

      The ultimate test of law making is the standard of living. Australia seems to be doing ok in that regard.

    53. Re:Easy solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      CarMax.

    54. Re:Easy solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh wait.

      You thought that you could drive that nice punchy little turbo diesel VW you just bought? Not in California. That's what good liberal governance will do for you, big-brother nanny state looking out for your interests or at least the interests that the state of California thinks you ought to have (if you we're just smart enough to understand, but you're not so the state does it for you).

    55. Re:Easy solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Directly, over the internet

      See my post below about the game changer.

    56. Re:Easy solution by vux984 · · Score: 1

      If dealers don't want to sell them, let manufacturers sell direct to the customers.

      Taking the dealer network out of the equation is largely irrelevant.

      If VW or GM or Ford open a direct to customers showroom and service center the sales team there aren't going to be any more motivated than the dealer network to sell electric cars. The managers are STILL going to be pushing the upsell service packages and cars that will bring the owners in for additional services too; and the commission structure and sales incentive plans will be counting those metrics.

      The exception of course is manufacturers that only make electric cars. So ... Tesla.

    57. Re: Easy solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The ultimate test of law making is the standard of living.

      So do the trains run on time?

    58. Re:Easy solution by viperidaenz · · Score: 1

      It would open the market up for more automotive companies.

      What is the incentive to sell through dealerships if they don't have to? They can either increase sales through lower prices or increase profit by cutting out the dealership.

    59. Re:Easy solution by viperidaenz · · Score: 1

      I know that. Hence the "let manufacturers sell direct to the customers"

    60. Re:Easy solution by viperidaenz · · Score: 1

      They're having assholes with local state laws prohibiting them from selling direct.

    61. Re: Easy solution by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 0

      What kind of standard of living is it where you can't look at A cup porn stars?

      Pshah.

      --
      She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
    62. Re:Easy solution by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 1

      For my last three honda's, I used internet pricing.

      I send an email to each dealerships requesting a bottom line final offer quote and then go buy from the best price.

      One time I got their and they tried to change the price (which was ironically about $700 over the next price but at a more convenient location). I walked out the door and got the car cheaper at the other dealership. After getting service there a few years, I switched to the more convenient dealer (probably bad practice on my part encouraging the scammy dealer but it was a half hour difference in driving time each way).

      --
      She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
    63. Re:Easy solution by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You can still buy the "less expensive" incandescent bulbs that are actually much more expensive than LED's now (plus the risk of changing high lights on a ladder every 9 months.

      Did you read the parent post? This is a case of buyers who want to buy electric... who walk in prepared to buy electric... and the sales people steer or even actively push the buyer away from electric. Mainly- again from the article- because the electric car will cost the buyer LESS money on maintenance.

      You can bet the dealerships have set up commission structure to encourage sales of gasoline cars too.

      Electric cars don't make as much sense as they did in 2014 with oil breaking $40 a barrel. But in 2-3 years oil is going to scream back up to over $100 (inflation adjusted) a barrel (it's done it twice before) and electric cars will be almost free to buy then when you consider improvements in battery life and capacity combined with an average $16,000 gasoline savings vs an average $1600 electricity cost. Plus another $4,000 in reduced maintenance costs.

      The gas car is the "less expensive" bulb that breaks down and requires more maintenance AND burns 10x the energy that that the "more expensive" bubls do.

      Most LED bulbs (now at $4.98) pay for themselves in 3 months now. The rest is free money from reduced energy bills.

      --
      She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
    64. Re: Easy solution by SuricouRaven · · Score: 1

      That's largely because they have a hugely profitable mining industry which effectively subsidises the entire country. It's much the same situation as several states in the middle east that have huge oil reserves.

    65. Re:Easy solution by Antique+Geekmeister · · Score: 2

      > i had a great experience at a mazda dealership.

      Saturn used to be like this. I had very positive experiences with them, for new car sales and used car sales, and for vehicle service. They did try to upsell, but gracefully, and took "no, thank you" for an answer. I found it sad that GM elected to sell off this division, rather than their other divisions, and the division closed when the sale fell through.

    66. Re: Easy solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For the most part, Australia's elected officials have historically been the descendants of the WARDENS (or pretended they were, by mimicking the attitudes & policies of their authoritarian warden-descended peers). Plus, even the 'criminals' were mostly just petty thieves who were offered emigration as an alternative to imprisonment in Britain. Like if the US offered to let anyone convicted of marijuana possession or DUI the option of moving to Alaska in lieu of jail time.

    67. Re:Easy solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Tesla is, in fact, an exception, because they can workaround the law. Until states add a new law to prevent them from doing so.

    68. Re:Easy solution by FlyHelicopters · · Score: 2

      I've lived in California... I hate to tell you, but you've been lied too... That state is so messed up in so many ways, I NEVER want to go back...

    69. Re:Easy solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If dealers don't want to sell them, let manufacturers sell direct to the customers.

      Agreed. When shopping for my Saturn in the late '90's, it was only a few keystrokes away.

    70. Re:Easy solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is the bit of stupid I noticed because that's not how the world works.

      Are you sure? I've seen the same kind of reasoning from the record industry. Somehow it is my obligation to make sure that they can make as much profit as they want on a business model that I think is outdated.
      If the dealers were as smart as RIAA they would make sure that there is a levy or tax on all vehicles like boats and bicycles to compensate them for lost income when people don't buy from them.

    71. Re: Easy solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Any state in Germany will work too. Probably any state that is not part of the United States (and probably some that are, too).

    72. Re: Easy solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, California's almost like a European country (unfortunately including the taxes).

    73. Re: Easy solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      New cars don't need to be stocked. They may as well be delivered directly to the customers who ordered them. Only for second-hand cars there is some sense in having something like a dealership.

    74. Re:Easy solution by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      You are Joe_Dragon AICMFP.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    75. Re: Easy solution by Jack+Griffin · · Score: 1

      I can, so I have no idea what you are talking about.
      Maybe less reading websites and more travel would do you some good.

    76. Re: Easy solution by Jack+Griffin · · Score: 1

      That's largely because they have a hugely profitable mining industry which effectively subsidises the entire country.

      Isn't this the same for every country? Every rich country has some rich industries providing the money. This argument makes no sense...

      It's much the same situation as several states in the middle east that have huge oil reserves.

      Yet they don't have as high standards of living. I fail to see how this is relevant?

    77. Re: Easy solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think they got that blue ring octopus shit too.

    78. Re: Easy solution by Extreme_biker0 · · Score: 2

      Electric cars do need tire rotation, brake pad replacement

      Because of regenerative braking which is standard on electric cars, the pads get used so little even they hardly need replacing. Here's a taxi firm who's oldest EV is still on it's first set of brake pads at 100k miles.

    79. Re: Easy solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If Abe Lincoln is so smart, how come he's dead?

    80. Re:Easy solution by prefec2 · · Score: 1

      Most electric car manufacturer do not actually build many electric cars if they do at all. In the EU it is impossible to order an E-Smart (Smart Electric Drive), as they do not build any of them. The car industry is largely not into it.

    81. Re: Easy solution by sociocapitalist · · Score: 2

      Like the Australian state that just criminalized possession of CAD files?

      Or the one that criminalizes video games?

      Or the one that criminalizes porn actresses with A cups?

      Australia is not the first country that comes to mind when "sane lawmaking" is the topic of discussion.

      Just for info, the A cup thing is debunked here: http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/...

      --
      blindly antisocialist = antisocial
    82. Re: Easy solution by linuxrocks123 · · Score: 1

      Of course it's not. That's an absolutely retarded thing to say.

      Standard of living doesn't include wondering every day if the government is going to take all your possessions on some pretext. Standard of living doesn't include not being able to access random websites because the government doesn't like what they say. Standard of living doesn't include imprisoned journalists, and the chilling effect that has on reporting.

      Standard of living doesn't include how much or how little security you have in the knowledge that the police can't bust into your house without at least convincing a judge they have a good reason. And finally, standard of living -- at least as measured as GDP per capita or net income per capita -- doesn't take into account the fact that getting more money, like most all things, has a decreasing marginal return in its effect on one's happiness.

      --
      vi ~/.emacs # I'm probably going to Hell for this.
    83. Re: Easy solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      LED lamps in a car will need replacement after typically 10k hours use. In a lightly used city car that mostly does daytime trips that might be 25+ years. In a taxi driven through the night it's likely to be more like 5 years. The LED lamps won't (shouldn't if manufactured to a good specification) suddenly cease functioning but they do grow gradually dimmer with use as the heat stress from operating slowly damages the actual diode. A very cheap LED pack, with inadequate heat sinks or running outside its design profile, may age out in just a few months, but it would be crazy to fit those to a car, since a car costs a LOT of money and people are bound to sue you if there's a pattern of failure. In a flashlight you paid $1 for, you'll probably throw it away if it fails.

    84. Re: Easy solution by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Or the one that criminalizes video games?

      For the record there is no law that criminalizes ownership of video games in any Australian state. The video game censorship debate that has raged has been about classification, and games which are refused classification are banned from sale or public performance only. It's not illegal to own any video game in Australia.

      Or the one that criminalizes porn actresses with A cups?

      Aside from the fact that this one turned out to be completely false it applies in the same was above. Even if it were real it only deals with the classification of material in which case the material is banned from sale or public display. Not that this would have a big impact since most Australian states have restrictions on X rated content anyway. But again, nothing criminalizes ownership of pictures or videos of consenting adults doing pretty much what they like.

    85. Re: Easy solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Beyond that, they should be largely maintenance-free.

      Therein lies the massive problem dealers and manufacturers have. We consumers want this, neither of the other parties do.

    86. Re:Easy solution by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      I agree, I'm a programmer in my 30s and the main reason I don't own a car is I can't be bothered to deal with dealer bullshit.

      No, no it isn't. You could buy a used car and never deal with a dealer. It is reasonable not to own a car, but not to expect us to believe total bullshit statements.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    87. Re:Easy solution by MMC+Monster · · Score: 1

      After all the bad press about the 'nice punchy little turbo diesel VW', I'd wish my state had laws taking them off the road until they were fixed.

      Emission standards exist for a reason. If your car doesn't pass them, you don't get to drive it.

      If that means you join a class action lawsuit against the manufacturer, so be it.

      --
      Help! I'm a slashdot refugee.
    88. Re: Easy solution by Stuarticus · · Score: 1

      Why travel because Murica?

      --
      If you think someone isn't free to have a different definition of "freedom" you may be a tyrant.
    89. Re: Easy solution by NormalVisual · · Score: 2

      Here's a taxi firm [speakev.com] who's oldest EV is still on it's first set of brake pads at 100k miles.

      I didn't have to put new pads on my half-ton pickup until 105,000 miles either. A lot of it comes down to how you drive, but the regenerative braking on EVs definitely helps.

      --
      Please stand clear of the doors, por favor mantenganse alejado de las puertas
    90. Re: Easy solution by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Eventually, those bearings fail, and you have to replace the motor

      Please tell me that isn't true. Why would you have to replace an entire motor due to a failed bearing? I don't even do that on my little quad-copter.

    91. Re: Easy solution by rtb61 · · Score: 1

      Well something has to pay for the US leaching so much money out of the Australian economy via junk money investments backed by the US Fed, to basically leach as much money as possible out of the Australian economy.

      On topic though, horse traders bitterly complain about selling the infernal combustion engine. Trying to explain how they can fit so many horse powers in that tiny space, why you can't feed it hay or why it seems so stupid it can't follow a road without constantly controlling it or why can;t you breed with two of them, is just to difficult and they should ban them, Either that of they have been told to complain by infernal combustion engine manufacturers as a typical PR=B$ stunt.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    92. Re:Easy solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      After all the bad press about the 'nice punchy little turbo diesel VW', I'd wish my state had laws taking them off the road until they were fixed.

      Why? If people are not allowed to drive their dieselgate-affected cars, they will probably use other cars instead. Most other cars pollute significantly more.

      Emission standards exist for a reason. If your car doesn't pass them, you don't get to drive it.

      However, that reason is not always what you would expect it to be. There is a lot of lobbying and some protectionism involved. Do you really think that it is a coincidence that U.S. emission standards are very strict in the one type of emission that diesel engines have trouble reducing (NOx) while being relatively lax in all other pollutants (CO, HC, PM, PN), even though they are more detrimental to the environment and to public health?

      If that means you join a class action lawsuit against the manufacturer, so be it.

      The manufacturer is not in a position to change what the local environmental authorities will and will not allow. A class action suit is pointless.

    93. Re:Easy solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What Tesla should do is intentionally break the laws in those states, then get the laws struck down because they're unconstitutionally prohibiting interstate commerce.

    94. Re: Easy solution by tbannist · · Score: 1

      What kind of standard of living is it where you can't look at A cup porn stars?

      You probably shouldn't believe everything you read...

      --
      Fanatically anti-fanatical
    95. Re:Easy solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At this stage of Tesla's development as a company, they can't afford such a legal fight. It would be expensive, and victory is not assured. It could bankrupt the company.

      Apple, on the other hand, when they launch their rumored electric car in about 5 years or so, I wouldn't be surprised if they take that exact approach if Tesla hasn't been successful in their lobbying efforts to get the laws changed.

    96. Re:Easy solution by tompaulco · · Score: 1

      ..except that the dealers have made that illegal, for the most part. For our protection, of course.

      That's what you get for allowing your dealers to make the law instead of your state government.

      --
      If you are not allowed to question your government then the government has answered your question.
    97. Re: Easy solution by tompaulco · · Score: 1

      Fuck that. I'm not picking up and moving because the car dealers have bought off my legislature.

      You move.

      I'll bet the citizenry has more money than the car dealers. Buy the legislature back. My guess is that the citizenry either likes it the way it is, or if anything they are willing to complain about it, but not willing to spend the money to fix the issue.

      --
      If you are not allowed to question your government then the government has answered your question.
    98. Re:Easy solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >California: the state government is running a surplus.
      Not correct, they have *projecting* a surplus for 2 years now, but have never actually achieved it.
      Free beer tomorrow.

    99. Re: Easy solution by tompaulco · · Score: 1

      New cars don't need to be stocked. They may as well be delivered directly to the customers who ordered them. Only for second-hand cars there is some sense in having something like a dealership.

      Yes, because people want to buy cars that they have never driven, or even sat in, or looked at in real life to see if they like the color, or interacted with the controls to see if they like them, etc, etc.

      --
      If you are not allowed to question your government then the government has answered your question.
    100. Re:Easy solution by tompaulco · · Score: 1

      He said the salesman offered him a $15-per-month maintenance package that included service for oil changes, belt repair and water pumps. "I said: 'You know it doesn't have any of those things,'" Mr. Kast recalled.

      Manufacturers need to step aside and bring prices down. With way fewer components than an ICE car, electric cars should cost much less. Yet the greedy car makers are charging more than an ICE car, go figure. The cost per mile for an electric car should be very less and that goes for road taxes as well.

      The quantity of components does not determine the price. The COST of those components determines the price. A 300 HP Ford CE engine brand new costs about $2,800. A set of 4 25 HP electric motors is about $6,000. The battery cost is about $2,000, so the locomotive parts for an EV is about $8,000. Then there is regenerative braking, which is unique to electric vehicles, and I don't know what the price would be for such a system.
      So, they are not just ripping you off. Electric motive technology is absolutely more expensive than combustion motive technology.

      --
      If you are not allowed to question your government then the government has answered your question.
    101. Re:Easy solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "For my last three honda's, I used internet pricing."

      Maybe for your next one, you can use a correct plural.

    102. Re: Easy solution by rock_climbing_guy · · Score: 1
      Don't forget suspension! Maintaining the suspension can be as costly as maintaining tires or breaks. Okay, you don't have to pay $20 for oil every 3000 miles, and you don't have to worry about belts as hoses AFAIK, but many of the big-ticket maintenance items are still there! As a matter of fact, other than oil and spark plugs, I don't think that there is a single maintenance item on my car that would have been mitigated by having an electric car.

      All that being said, I do want to drive an electric car some day, and I don't want to pay the early-adopter tax.

      --
      Wh47 d1d j00 541, 31337 15n't t3h r0xor5 ne m0r3???
    103. Re: Easy solution by rock_climbing_guy · · Score: 1

      If only there was a company that had no sunk investment in those hassles that was highly motivated to create a desirable car...

      --
      Wh47 d1d j00 541, 31337 15n't t3h r0xor5 ne m0r3???
    104. Re:Easy solution by rock_climbing_guy · · Score: 2

      I've visited CarMax a few times while shopping for a car. I'll never even bother going there again because they consistently demanded much higher prices for their cars compared to other local sellers.

      --
      Wh47 d1d j00 541, 31337 15n't t3h r0xor5 ne m0r3???
    105. Re:Easy solution by Noah+Haders · · Score: 1

      Except it's not free to open up a nationwide network of retail stores. Why are you convinced this is the best way? It would also require a whole bunch of capital upfront to open and stock the stores. How does that help get more auto OEMs if they need to invest even more capital in order to sell in America?

    106. Re: Easy solution by ilsaloving · · Score: 1

      Or the one that criminalizes porn actresses with A cups?

      Dafuq? O_o Seriously?

    107. Re: Easy solution by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 1

      Well I was going to let it be since someone else who also didn't get the joke down moderated.

      But since I got multiple responses while down modded...

      It was a joke.

      Playing on the idea that the ability to see A cup porn stars is a critical aspect of having a high quality life.

      One dead frog at your service*

      *This is an idiomatic expression. It refers to having to explain a joke. I am not literally killing a frog.

      --
      She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
    108. Re:Easy solution by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 1

      It was late. I was slapping out a fast and lose response.

      Don't loose your cool over a grammar nit.

      --
      She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
    109. Re:Easy solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The solution is new dealerships for the electric cars. Not a problem then, if the gas people don't want to sell electric cars - they won't get to do that. Staff the electric car dealership with different people. They don't need to have much car knowledge - precisely because there is so little to service on an electric car. People used to selling printer or washing machines are fine. They're used to limited margins and no followup service. They can change bulbs and fit a better stereo - which is almost all you need to service electrics. Perhaps a part-time genuine mechanic for those rare brake pad operations.

    110. Re:Easy solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This a billion times. I wish the archaic dealership model would just become extinct and be gotten rid of. That's why I love the Tesla model, can never afford one, but I can walk into a Tesla store and get what I want like buying food or clothes.

    111. Re: Easy solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ceramic brake pads will do that for you. That's why brake shops will sell you lifetime pads, but never lifetime rotors. Ceramic wears the rotors down instead. They've been around for a very long time.

    112. Re:Easy solution by ewibble · · Score: 1

      The amount they can sell it to you also determines the price, competition also determines the price.

      For example, when I bought my car, $20,000 car I asked for an spare key, they said it would be $400, it came with 2 keys already, so 4% of the value of the car was the keys? I can buy an entire alarm system, installed for less than that with two controllers. The reason the cost is so high is because they have a monopoly on those keys, nobody else can make them.

      The point is, just because you can buy that part, for cheaper doesn't mean that actually costs the manufacture less to produce, it might, but not necessarily.

    113. Re: Easy solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >Eventually, those bearings fail, and you have to replace the motor, but not for a very long time.

      I certainly hope not. You can typically press new bearings in for just about all other motors, after all.

      >Electric cars do need tire rotation, brake pad replacement, and replacement of brake lights and other exterior lights (if they aren't LEDs). Beyond that, they should be largely maintenance-free.

      You missed suspension, steering, body work/subframe rot, electical issues, HVAC issues, LED lights (yeah, they do go bad, apparently rather often from what I've seen on the road), tires, snow tires and wheels, parking brake adjustment, brake fluid, bearing replacement, differential work (though that could be eliminated), axle issues, interior problems (broken seats, for example), interior lights, batteries, and probably other stuff I've forgotten.

      You do get to save on engine work and transmission work, which are both rare but yet very expensive. And you save on cooling system work (also typically rare) and exhaust work (a little more common). And you won't need oil changes (except maybe diff oil).

      I'd say you should save about 20-30% of car maintenance costs by buying electric. For me, most of my work on beaters involves suspension, steering, and brake lines, so for me I would save about 5%. I refuse to buy beaters with blown engines or busted trannys.

    114. Re: Easy solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nazi Germany had a pretty good standard of living for a while. Not to Godwin but, well, it's relevant.

    115. Re: Easy solution by Man+On+Pink+Corner · · Score: 1

      A spokesperson for the ACB told me today that publications which contain offensive depictions or descriptions of persons who are or appear to be persons under the age of 18 (whether they are engaged in sexual activity or not) must be classified RC. They said the Board classifies publications on a case by case basis, in accordance with the Guidelines for the Classification of Publications, the Code and the Classification Act and that the Publications Guidelines do not specify breast size.

      Rather than "debunking" anything, this quote reflects a situation that's even worse. If the model "appears to be" under 18, that's apparently enough to impose prior restraint. A standard based on bra size could at least be enforced objectively, but how do you appeal a decision of an unelected, unaccountable censorship board on no grounds other than "She looks 18 to me?"

    116. Re:Easy solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's right the state is looking our for my right not to breath smog.

    117. Re: Easy solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Property taxes in California are really low by any standard.

    118. Re: Easy solution by StirlingArcher · · Score: 1

      Err, doesn't the Volt have a petrol engine that powers a generator, which in turn powers an electric motor? Therefore, it needs oil.

    119. Re:Easy solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Jerry Brown's idea when facing a budget deficit was both to raise taxes and to cut higher ed, welfare, healthcare for the poor, services for the developmentally disabled, and state agency funding.

      Show me a Democrat on the national level who will take on those targets and I might vote for them.

    120. Re:Easy solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can also buy brown liquor from a grocery store on Sunday.

    121. Re: Easy solution by dgatwood · · Score: 1

      Ah. My bad. I assumed that because this was about electric cars, the vehicle actually was... you know, an electric car, not a hybrid....

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    122. Re:Easy solution by Gavagai80 · · Score: 1

      I got my car on ebay. There are lots of non-dealer options at fair prices.

      --
      This space intentionally left blank
    123. Re: Easy solution by dgatwood · · Score: 1

      Eventually, those bearings fail, and you have to replace the motor, but not for a very long time.

      I certainly hope not. You can typically press new bearings in for just about all other motors, after all.

      You can put new bands in a transmission, too. Still, probably 99% of the time, you get a rebuilt transmission installed, and the installer ships back the old part to be remanufactured. I would expect that to be true for electric motor repairs as well.

      You missed suspension, steering, body work/subframe rot, electical issues, HVAC issues, LED lights (yeah, they do go bad, apparently rather often from what I've seen on the road), tires, snow tires and wheels, parking brake adjustment, brake fluid, bearing replacement, differential work (though that could be eliminated), axle issues, interior problems (broken seats, for example), interior lights, batteries, and probably other stuff I've forgotten.

      Brakes and steering on most electric vehicles are electrical, not hydraulic, which should result in very low maintenance, at least within the currently typical lifespan of a car.

      Besides, most of the things on that list are repairs (after failures), not routine maintenance (to prevent future failures). There's nothing you can do maintenance-wise to prevent a blown interior bulb or a broken seat (except perhaps losing weight if you're on the heavy side).

      The only thing on your list that I would consider true maintenance is tires, which was one of the things I mentioned.

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    124. Re: Easy solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dealers make very little of the sake of a new car. . Hundreds in most cases. The money comes from used cars and service.

    125. Re: Easy solution by galgon · · Score: 1

      Yes. Metric time.

    126. Re:Easy solution by _Sharp'r_ · · Score: 1

      Yes, I read the articles. What I stated is that the article is biased and wrong. Your opinion is that the article is right and that one or two anecdotes explain the electric car market. I'd contend that actual empirical sales figures for different types of vehicles and actual costs for different types of vehicles are more illuminating than a couple of anecdote's written by someone with a well-known bias, but YMMV. :)

      I'm willing to be proven wrong. Have you ever seen any data from a relatively neutral or reputable source indicating that electric cars on average have lower total cost of ownership than comparable gas vehicles?

      I picked one at semi-random (literally, the first one I found in a Google search) and looked up the TCO on Edmunds:
      Spark EV, 5 year TCO $34K
      Exact same car, gas version, 5 year TCO $28K

      So in exchange for your car only having an 82 mile range before needing to be charged vs a 300+ mile range before a much faster fill-up, you only need to pay 22% more for it. What a deal!

      Unless you are in a rare and special situation, the EV version isn't going to be a good deal for you. You're paying more and getting less. That's why only 1.6% of new cars sold are EVs... it doesn't make sense for the vast majority of people to buy them. Occam's razor, the simple reason is the correct one here, no need for conspiracy theories about dealerships.

      --
      The party of stupid and the party of evil get together and do something both stupid and evil, then call it bipartisan.
    127. Re: Easy solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Avoid a vold.

    128. Re: Easy solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and the rest of it is complete bull as well

    129. Re: Easy solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As a son of Immigrants, with an Immigrant wife;

      citation needed

      perhaps you mean illegal immigrants?

    130. Re:Easy solution by viperidaenz · · Score: 1

      That will be because the mass manufacture of a gasoline engine is cheap compared to a car sized battery.

      Even if the regulations were relaxed to only allow electric cars to be sold direct, the price to the consumer would be better, with less markup compared to non-electric..

    131. Re: Easy solution by Jack+Griffin · · Score: 1

      I never understood why anyone likes little titties, you may as well look at small boys. C Cup and above is the key to my quality of life.

    132. Re: Easy solution by Jack+Griffin · · Score: 1

      All that stuff is what happens when you spend too much time in your bedroom reading headlines.
      There is a big exciting world out there, don't let headlines drag you down.

    133. Re: Easy solution by rickb928 · · Score: 1

      Employers don't mind, and the government encourages immigration, but several trades groups are raising opposition based on the immigrants coming for education and staying for jobs they think should go to residents

      --
      deleting the extra space after periods so i can stay relevant, yeah.
    134. Re: Easy solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They try to cheat our systems with technicalities, therefore why is it a problem to divert them when they technically didn't hit land? If you really wanted better lives for those people, you'd have taken them in yourself rather than expecting us to do so.

    135. Re: Easy solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Too right we're descendants of criminals, we love breaking laws! That's precisely why we make so many bloody laws, it's so much easier to break them that way. I'm writing this on a laptop I just stole with the help of my trusty pocketknife (equivalent in size to your machete) and I'm waiting on a pirate download of a censored game to keep me entertained while hiding from the cops and waiting for an opportunity to flog a roo to escape on.

    136. Re: Easy solution by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 1

      Speaking seriously... anything smaller than an "H" cup gets about the same reaction from me. I'm more about the ratio of hips to midriff.
      However, "H" cup on up do prompt an automatic reaction.

      --
      She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
    137. Re: Easy solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Materialistic reductionism is as stupid as the other stupid philosophies less creative and insightful adolescents rediscover and then think they invented. See, I can do ad hominem, too?

      Anonymous because you're not interesting enough to login for.

    138. Re: Easy solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Seriously? What makes you say that?
      Asylum seekers are what a vocal and ignorant (and conservative voting) minority mob of my fellow Aussies have got their knickers in a twist about, not immigrants.

    139. Re:Easy solution by rch7 · · Score: 1

      Try buying Tesla directly and see how cheap it was and how cheap its maintenance was, just some $600/year vs $30 for Chevy, and how cheap are repairs when no repair manuals or more complicated spare parts are sold to you and you don't have "right to repair" laws on your side as Tesla doesn't have independent dealers.

      Whoever sells the car, it needs to compete by price, whatever your conspiracy theories. Now Sonic is $14,000-$22,000 MSRP, similar size Volt twice as much. It means you are going into niche market and selling to few enthusiasts, wasting all your work time and loosing money. You may save for fuel a bit if your electric rate is low, but it isn't low for everybody, and people take loans to buy cars or houses, and with extra high payments you simply will not qualify by Debt-to-Income ratio, as banks don't look into fuel savings, they will need fixed payment each month no matter if you drive or not.

    140. Re: Easy solution by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 1

      They try to cheat our systems with technicalities, therefore why is it a problem to divert them when they technically didn't hit land? If you really wanted better lives for those people, you'd have taken them in yourself rather than expecting us to do so.

      I've already stated elsewhere that I'm prepared to take in a refugee when Canada brings them over here. If I were in Oz, I would have already done so.

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
    141. Re: Easy solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Tesla is already doing that albeit too expensive for many. Dealerships will hang themselves in time and most will go away and no consumer bat an eye cause the dealership model is archaic and everyone hates it. Simple Darwinism my friends, but I do feel bad for the small guys that get hurt by it. Change can hurt if you don't get out of its way. B

    142. Re: Easy solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Typically, yes. Cars that have been at the dealership for buyer evaluation are typically sold at a hefty discount. I don't think a dealership could get away with letting other customers evaluate a new car that has been ordered for a customer.

    143. Re:Easy solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I appreciate everything you've said here except the sunny mention of the State of California's fiscal health. I don't doubt you're 100% right in what you said, but your comment is misleading about that sort of thing (California's fiscal health) in general.

    144. Re:Easy solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And, obviously, the dealer (and the dealer-manufacturer relationship) injects significant uncertainty into the price of the car.

    145. Re: Easy solution by easyTree · · Score: 1

      He was killed by a large whooshing sound overhead...

    146. Re: Easy solution by easyTree · · Score: 1

      Blah blah; the US is the only country; what are you even taking about?

    147. Re: Easy solution by easyTree · · Score: 1

      âoeAll evolution in thought and conduct must at first appear as heresy and misconduct.â
      ~ George Bernard Shaw

    148. Re: Easy solution by easyTree · · Score: 1

      Sorry. California is the most fucked up, disfunctional state in the union.
         

      You, sir or madam coward, are a fool and an ass. Usually California is way ahead of the country.

      "All evolution in thought and conduct must at first appear as heresy and misconduct."
      ~ George Bernard Shaw.

    149. Re:Easy solution by toddestan · · Score: 1

      Well, part of the problem with Saturn is that starting in the early 2000's GM disassembled everything that made it different, so that at the end it really was just another GM nameplate selling the same cars as all the other GM nameplates, often at the same dealer. That's probably why no one wanted to buy it, as it really wasn't unique anymore.

    150. Re: Easy solution by toddestan · · Score: 1

      As long as it still lights up and you can see it, my guess is that no one is going to replace a dimming light cluster. Besides, most failures would either be the electronics that drive the LEDs, or water eventually getting into the housing.

      Besides, assuming an average speed of 30 MPH (which is likely a bit on the low side) 10k hours is 300,000 miles which would be about the expected lifetime of the rest of the car anyway.

    151. Re: Easy solution by ganjadude · · Score: 1

      lol

      --
      have you seen my sig? there are many others like it but none that are the same
    152. Re:Easy solution by GNU(slash)Nickname · · Score: 1

      My kingdom for mod points.

    153. Re:Easy solution by FacePlant · · Score: 1

      How will the Car Dealers prop up their unsustainable business model if there's competition?

      --
      My Heart Is A Flower
    154. Re: Easy solution by dl_sledding · · Score: 1

      How about death multipliers? That sounds fun! More bang for the buck!

      Or death divisors? Splitting the load between multiple death dealers should make it more efficient, and again, fun!

    155. Re:Easy solution by viperidaenz · · Score: 1

      Well it's USA, so political lobbying (read: bribing) and lawyers of course.

  2. Dealers cannot die soon enough by Rix · · Score: 2

    Why should they make any profit whatsoever? They're an anachronistic middle man.

    1. Re: Dealers cannot die soon enough by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's right. Give all the profits to the company, where they belong!

    2. Re: Dealers cannot die soon enough by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah! Everyone should be ripped off equally! Like the Apple store!

    3. Re:Dealers cannot die soon enough by Noah+Haders · · Score: 1, Interesting

      why are they anachronistic middle man? the auto OEM wants to be an OEM, not a retail sales company. that's why they choose to contract with the dealers. you think Kia wants to open up their own showrooms at malls across america? I assure you not. The dealer is there not for the benefit of the consumers, but for the benefit of the OEMs.

    4. Re:Dealers cannot die soon enough by Noah+Haders · · Score: 1

      this is a +1 all-star comment. people have such a hard-on for hating on dealers. there are good dealers and bad dealers. go to the good dealers. use tools like truecar.com to get an independent assessment of car prices. you can call up the truecar website when talking with the dealer.

    5. Re:Dealers cannot die soon enough by pla · · Score: 5, Insightful

      you think Kia wants to open up their own showrooms at malls across america? I assure you not.

      Hey, if Kia doesn't want to sell directly to me - Tesla does. I have no problem with both business models competing with one another.

      I do, however, have a problem with needing to deal with middle-men because of protectionist laws that forbid companies like Tesla from selling directly to me. But hey, YMMV, right?

    6. Re:Dealers cannot die soon enough by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or perhaps the correct question is:

      Why should the sale be dependent on costly maintenance that's not only unnecessary on the electric models but also less economical?

      Sorry, but refusing to sell a product just because it doesn't net you as much of a return (a.k.a. extortion) via repairs is a bullshit reason, and should not be tolerated.

      These people (the middlemen) are literately saying that their "right to profit" (no such right exists), takes presidence over the manufacturer's "right to profit". Once again no such right exists, but for the sake of argument even if it did exist, the manufacturer has more of an investment in the product than the middlemen (R&D, brand name reputation, ongoing support, etc.) and therefore *should* have the greater "right". So the middlemen's own argument is usable against them in this scenario.

      This is where capitalism bites you in the ass, because unless all the parties in the supply chain agree, the product never gets to the consumer. Even if it's a better all around product than it's competition. Here's a thought: "What about all of those oil change and, tune-up shops? Well they'll just become battery sales and replacement outfits." Or does that only work when the industry being phased out is one that is not liked by society because it's been replaced by the new shiny?

    7. Re:Dealers cannot die soon enough by hcs_$reboot · · Score: 1

      They're an anachronistic middle man.

      Not so much anachronistic, unfortunately.

      --
      Slashdot, fix the reply notifications... You won't get away with it...
    8. Re:Dealers cannot die soon enough by hcs_$reboot · · Score: 1

      They're an anachronistic middle man.

      Yeah the famous man in the middle attack, we should really do something about that!

      --
      Slashdot, fix the reply notifications... You won't get away with it...
    9. Re:Dealers cannot die soon enough by tompaulco · · Score: 1

      Sorry, but refusing to sell a product just because it doesn't net you as much of a return (a.k.a. extortion) via repairs is a bullshit reason, and should not be tolerated.

      Yes, this is why most software engineers turn down jobs at Apple, Amazon, Microsoft and Google and instead work at the Board of Education or Department of Human Services even though they pay less money.

      --
      If you are not allowed to question your government then the government has answered your question.
  3. Re:Easy solution - COSTCO does it better by BoRegardless · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Tell em what you want, they tell you how much it costs and when and where you can pick it up.

  4. The takeaway is that Tesla is right by JoshuaZ · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The takeway I get is that Tesla's attempts to sell directly and avoid dealers makes complete sense because dealers have a clear conflict of interest here. Heck, it makes it seem like we should get rid of dealers altogether since they won't in general want to sell any cars that are very novel or that require substantially less maintenance.

    1. Re:The takeaway is that Tesla is right by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      Dealers have a conflict of interest because manufacturers are dumb. Manufacturers have variable margins built into the cars that encourage sales. One would hope they line up with the maker's desires (or profits), but often they don't. And makers like GM that have $2000 rebates on everything almost all the time encourage buyers to avoid them when there isn't a sale.

    2. Re:The takeaway is that Tesla is right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Ah yes, the superfluous (and in the information age, increasingly so) middle man.

      Other examples: the RIAA, various cable and internet providers, and of course the medical insurance industry, proudly leeching away 8% of the entire GDP.

      Of course, they are all impossible to get rid of because they flood Washington with cold hard cash in order not to be rationalized away.

    3. Re:The takeaway is that Tesla is right by somenickname · · Score: 2

      Even beyond the conflict of interest, the dealer doesn't actually provide a useful knowledge base to help you make an informed decision when buying a car. If you ask them *any* question whose answer isn't plainly stated on the sticker or in the meager sales brochure, you will get one of two answers: 1) A shrug and, "I dunno". or 2) A flat out lie. A couple hours of research on a car will make you the foremost expert in the building on that particular car. By a significant margin. Car sales people are the quientissential useless middle man. Maybe at one time they served a real purpose but, that time has long passed and now they just basically skim a bit of money off something they didn't create, don't know anything about and really don't even give a shit about.

    4. Re:The takeaway is that Tesla is right by Ritz_Just_Ritz · · Score: 1

      And we have a winner. :)

      The dealers, through political patronage, are fighting tooth and nail to prevent this model for the very reason that it will dramatically cut into their post-sales revenue stream.

      There is absolutely no reason for dealers to exist anymore. Just allow the car manufacturers to have showrooms and sell/maintain vehicles without the middleman.

      Surely, those smarmy sales guys can get jobs working for EMC, Cisco, Oracle or somesuch. :)

    5. Re:The takeaway is that Tesla is right by ksheff · · Score: 1

      The manufacturers don't want to sell you "any cars that are very novel or that require substantially less maintenance". Hell, they don't have to be all that novel. Just try some manufacturer's "build to order" site for a car. "Oh, you want a manual transmission and a normal spare tire on that Chevy Colorado?...Too bad, you need to upgrade to the V6 and get the automatic." WTF?!?! A few of Fiat-Chrysler's vehicles are built in Europe and have more powertrain options than what they will sell you in the US. For some reason, they insist on you getting the 9 speed automatic shitbox for damn near everything if you're a US customer. Everyone else has more choices.

      --
      the good ground has been paved over by suicidal maniacs
    6. Re:The takeaway is that Tesla is right by Noah+Haders · · Score: 1, Interesting

      when was the last time you shopped for a car? I shopped for a car last summer, and it was an eye opening experience. some dealerships were dodgy and I got out of there fast, and other dealerships were really great and spent a lot of time with me.

      and dealers aren't useless. they have incredible value... to the OEM. you think a foreign company like Kia wants to put billions into the ground to open up retail stores across America? They would much rather partner with other companies to be the retail agents, aka dealers.

    7. Re:The takeaway is that Tesla is right by Noah+Haders · · Score: 1

      There is absolutely no reason for dealers to exist anymore. Just allow the car manufacturers to have showrooms and sell/maintain vehicles without the middleman.

      why would you think that if the law changed that everything would become different? OEMs don't *want* to sell direct to public. They like the dealer model. it works very well for them.

    8. Re:The takeaway is that Tesla is right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's too bad tesla is really only interested in selling cars to rich people. Despite all their grand claims, they still don't have a model priced to sell in the "regular people" market. So who gives a shit.

    9. Re:The takeaway is that Tesla is right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OEMs don't *want* to sell direct to public. They like the dealer model. it works very well for them.

      Uh, we know that is demonstrably false, because the CEO Tesla has gone on public record stating that the present system is corrupt and unfair and that they would have direct sales dealerships if state's laws didn't forbid it.

    10. Re: The takeaway is that Tesla is right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > and of course the medical insurance industry, proudly leeching away 8% of the entire GDP

      It's a lot more than 8%, 2.5 trillion on a 15 trillion economy.

      Worse, look at the growth rate of both... unchecked, medical insurance will be 50% of GDP in 10 years!

      Something's gotta give. ..

    11. Re:The takeaway is that Tesla is right by yuhong · · Score: 1

      I wonder why this pricing model was created in the first place.

    12. Re: The takeaway is that Tesla is right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes but part of those 2.5 trillion go towards treatment. I meant the amount purely wasted on the middle man/insurance industry.

    13. Re:The takeaway is that Tesla is right by oobayly · · Score: 1

      If you want to know how dumb manufacturers are...

      In the UK, Mitsubishi wanted to say that they've sold 10,000 Outlander PHEVs, but they'd only sold 9,000. The solution was to pre-register 1,000 and then stick them in a field and sell them insanely cheaply. This means that Mitsubishi dealers are not allowed to advertise a used Outlander PHEV (if they do, they will get a call telling them to take the advert down).

      The end result is that if somebody tries part exchanging their Outlander, they'll be given a shit price as nobody wants the things because they're nigh on impossible to sell, so they'll tell people "they're a great car*, but they lose their value insanely quickly".

      * I know several people with Outlander PHEVs, and they all love them.

    14. Re:The takeaway is that Tesla is right by NormalVisual · · Score: 1

      Okay, that's *one* OEM, and they sell only electric cars. What about the Big Three and the other manufacturers that primarily build IC cars?

      --
      Please stand clear of the doors, por favor mantenganse alejado de las puertas
    15. Re:The takeaway is that Tesla is right by geoskd · · Score: 4, Insightful

      and other dealerships were really great and spent a lot of time with me.

      You as the end consumer paid approximately $70 per hour for the time they spent with you, including the time of *both* people it took to process your loan application, *and* the two hours they stood around waiting for you to arrive. After all of that, they still provided you with less useful information than you could have gleaned by reading the relevant consumer reports issue. I'm sorry to have to be the one to tell you, you got swindled and you apparently didn't even know it. All told, that middle man added approximately 8%, which for a Toyota corolla is about $1500. Was it worth $1500 for them to treat you the way they did, and do you still feel that their service was "really great"?

      To put that in perspective, $1500 would buy you a night at a Waldorf Astoria with a McLaren MP4-12C rental car for the day.

      --
      I wish I had a good sig, but all the good ones are copyrighted
    16. Re:The takeaway is that Tesla is right by Noah+Haders · · Score: 1

      OK, if Toyota built out a nationwide network of retail stores, and staff those stores, and put inventory in those stores, how much per car would that I'll add to the price? I bet it's much more than 1500, because if it were less, they would've done it!

    17. Re:The takeaway is that Tesla is right by geoskd · · Score: 1

      OK, if Toyota built out a nationwide network of retail stores, and staff those stores, and put inventory in those stores, how much per car would that I'll add to the price? I bet it's much more than 1500, because if it were less, they would've done it!

      All other reasons aside, they haven't done it because in 41 of the 50 states, its prohibited by law. That renders any economics completely moot...

      --
      I wish I had a good sig, but all the good ones are copyrighted
    18. Re:The takeaway is that Tesla is right by Noah+Haders · · Score: 1

      and if the laws were overturned, everything would stay pretty much how it is now. cuz economics.

  5. Get rid of middlemen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If we have an economy where the only thing that matters is relationships and the actual products mean little, then we have an economy which is not based on the core of the value.

    Either make car dealerships advertise and sell "hey talk to me for a week and give me more of your money for a car" or get rid of them. Now if people are working for something other than money then that's an entirely different story, but if that's the case make that known as well. When you buy a car all you can expect to get is a car, that's basic.

  6. Better Question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why should I need a dealership to sell me a car in the first place?

    1. Re:Better Question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And why should I buy my vegetables from an independent grocery store of my choice? Why can't I just buy them directly from Monsanto?

    2. Re:Better Question by Locke2005 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I find dealerships very annoying because they don't want to sell you the car you want, they want to sell you one of the cars they have on the lot that day! Apparently their goal with every customer is to have them buy something the same day, not come back later to pick up the actual vehicle they wanted. Why can't I order a vehicle with everything I want from the manufacturer, and go pick it up at the plant or port of entry myself, saving the $800 in "destination fees"?

      --
      I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
    3. Re:Better Question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I'm sure that vegetables purchased from Monsanto would be healthier for you than the paint chips you must have consumed at some point prior to posting that comment.

    4. Re:Better Question by darthsilun · · Score: 1

      Well, you can order the car with everything exactly the way you want. You just need to find a cooperative dealer. And then be prepared to wait. For an import you might have to wait six to nine months to get it.
      And I suppose you could spend $500+ to fly to the factory. And then gas to drive it home plus hotels and meals along the way. Or you could pay the $800+ delivery charge.

    5. Re:Better Question by Copid · · Score: 2

      Answer: Some middle men add value and some simply extract rents. Distributing and warehousing a wide variety of perishable vegetables for purchase on demand at random times is a valuable and complex service. Having a showroom to poke at cars in person adds value, but basically *everything* else a dealer does is either overpriced compared to alternatives or actively subtracts value from the car buying experience.

      --
      An interesting anagram of "BANACH TARSKI" is "BANACH TARSKI BANACH TARSKI"
    6. Re:Better Question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Being able to buy vegetables directly from the farmer is a great idea! We could even designate a place for local farmers to set up, like a market, for farmers... a farmer's market.

      It has potential, but it needs a catchy name.

    7. Re:Better Question by worldthinker · · Score: 1

      Under your proposed model, commodities would only be available for the short period of time after those farmers had harvested them. No storage, no long distance delivery. The rest of the year you do without.

      The great value that our system of food distributorship in this country is that it provides a great abundance and variety of food commodities available for most of the year.

      In the case of cars, the direct sales model would be preferable.

    8. Re:Better Question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And I suppose you could spend $500+ to fly to the factory. And then gas to drive it home plus hotels and meals along the way. Or you could pay the $800+ delivery charge.

      Nope. In the US you have to pay the destination charge regardless of where you live. This is to provide dealers who sell away from the factory the same chances of making the sale as those who live in the city where they are made. Everyone must be scammed equally.

    9. Re:Better question by Strudelkugel · · Score: 1

      Because they require more service than an electric car, as the article mentioned. I don't buy the argument that electrics are too different from ICE cars Most car sales people don't know much about a full featured ICE car, either. Their primary objective is to sell you something on the lot, because it has a carrying cost. Better still, lease it to you or "help" you finance it and get you to buy an extended warranty. But the big money comes when you service it.

      You can make an argument that having a lot of inventory is one advantage to the dealer system. But for the most part, I think car dealers are worthless and the process of buying a car is truly insulting, even with high end cars. My next car will be a Tesla or Uber or Lyft or some combination of the above. I'm done with ICE cars and the jokers who sell them.

      --
      Imagine how much harder physics would be if electrons had feelings! -Feynman, maybe
    10. Re:Better Question by Noah+Haders · · Score: 1

      what do you think about the argument that as cars become more and more complex, the service technicians will need to have more specialized knowledge about particular brands, and service shops will need more and more specialized equipment custom to certain brands, like diagnostic computers or similar. This is a strong argument for service shops that specialize in one or a select few OEMs. The dealership model is one way of getting this result.

    11. Re:Better Question by Noah+Haders · · Score: 1

      it would be more preferable for you, but the OEMs would prefer to keep the dealer model. unless the dealer model becomes illegal, OEMs will choose to do this.

    12. Re:Better question by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      Because they require more overpriced service.

    13. Re:Better Question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      America doesn't make good cars (including the "Japanese" and "German" cars made in the US), so how am I going to drive a car home from Japan or France to LA?

    14. Re:Better Question by Copid · · Score: 1

      On the one hand, I'm highly skeptical that it's actually true. I mean, it's not as though the dealer is the only place you can go for car servicing even now. In fact, going to the dealer is generally considered to be what suckers do. And in terms of complexity, cars are likely peaking out--as we transition to electric, they'll get mechanically simpler. Whether the electronics are serviceable (software lockout, etc.) is an interesting question, but the only way to make independent service operations viable is to mandate that manufacturers make replacement boards and diagnostic manuals available. If we don't, manufacturers will be able to software "lock out" everybody no matter what our sales channels look like.

      Even assuming it's the case that we need some mandate to make it happen, there's no reason for car *sales* to go through that channel. You just need to mandate that manufacturers make parts and manuals available to third parties on reasonable terms. The reality is that the dealers don't seem to be making much money on sales anyway these days. It's all through servicing or financing. And in exchange for that, we get a miserable, sleazy buying experience that is widely recognized to be the worst in any industry or market. So it seems clear that whatever we're trying to do, we're doing it wrong.

      It seems like the simplest solution would be a ban on manufacturers offering services and parts directly to the public. That way there would be a profitable market for parts and technical manuals, but the manufacturers wouldn't have an incentive to kill off the competition. The service operations would just be customers instead of competition.

      --
      An interesting anagram of "BANACH TARSKI" is "BANACH TARSKI BANACH TARSKI"
    15. Re:Better Question by Jack+Griffin · · Score: 2

      Car Sales are another dinosaur industry vulnerable to be disrupted, just like Taxis prior to Uber.
      I'm surprised that some VC's aren't already plotting their demise as we speak.

    16. Re:Better question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can buy a good used gas powered car with the $4,000 deposit you get from a dead $40,000 electric when the main battery dies. Chances are it will last longer than your electric did too.

    17. Re:Better Question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      >For an import you might have to wait six to nine months to get it.

      Yeah. Getting a Ford or GM from Mexico takes times. If you want a Nissan, Honda, or Toyota, well, those plants are all in the US. Hell, all three of those are within day-trip distance for me.

      Buy Honda. Buy American.

    18. Re:Better Question by Noah+Haders · · Score: 1

      you sure are big into regulation to set the rules of the game. why don't you let the market sort itself out? I think you find that it will settle to exactly where it is now. Aside from some high end boutiques, all the OEMs will sell through a dealer network. This is common not just in automotive but many industries. I'm shopping for high end stereos right now and it's the same thing.

      And the car buying process continues to get easier and more transparent. sites like truecar show the price history and inventory costs of new cars. you can just open this up and show it to the dealer when discussing a fair price. And when I was shopping for cars earlier this summer, I probably went to 12 different dealers. a third struck me as way sleaze cheeze, a third were meh, and a third were really cool. i bought from a really cool dealer.

    19. Re:Better Question by rubycodez · · Score: 1

      Just pull the red lever all the way back https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

    20. Re:Better Question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I find dealerships very annoying because they don't want to sell you the car you want, they want to sell you one of the cars they have on the lot that day!

      Which affords you the perfect opportunity to negotiate because every day that car, which they've already committed to sell, spends on the lot costs them money. Who knows how long the car will sit and cost them if they cannot sell it to you? Now, some people live for haggling and other people cannot stand it. You seem to be the later and not the former which explains why you hate dealerships that try to sell you the car they have on the lot that day.

      Why can't I order a vehicle with everything I want from the manufacturer

      You can absolutely do that, just don't expect to get too much consideration on the price. This is true with just about anything. If you want a product that meets all of your specifications, without compromise on anything, then the price is generally going to be top-shelf full retail, take it or leave it.

      saving the $800 in "destination fees"

      News flash, the manufacturer is not going to ship 2,000+ lbs of metal half way around the world to you for free. It's going to be an itemized charge or rolled into the price of the vehicle. You're going to pay one way or another.

    21. Re:Better Question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It seems like the simplest solution would be a ban on manufacturers offering services and parts directly to the public. That way there would be a profitable market for parts and technical manuals, but the manufacturers wouldn't have an incentive to kill off the competition. The service operations would just be customers instead of competition.

      Having the government ban transactions between consenting adults rarely ends well. Take for example the "war on drugs" or the current idiocy in Venezuela. The economy doesn't work that way, which is why bans of the sort that you propose tend to backfire or produce undesirable side effects all while failing to achieve their intended results. Be careful with that ban hammer, it's a tool of economic destruction, not economic progress.

    22. Re:Better Question by mbkennel · · Score: 1

      | I find dealerships very annoying because they don't want to sell you the car you want, they want to sell you one of the cars they have on the lot that day! Apparently their goal with every customer is to have them buy something the same day, not come back later to pick up the actual vehicle they wanted

      The reason is simple. Dealers buy cars from the manufacturer using money they borrow from banks. More cars on the lot means more loans outstanding which they have to pay interest on.

    23. Re:Better Question by Copid · · Score: 3, Interesting

      you sure are big into regulation to set the rules of the game. why don't you let the market sort itself out?

      Wow, that's an interesting reading of this thread. I thought I was responding to the hypothetical idea that nobody would repair cars if we didn't have a state-mandated dealer system. Apparently not.

      I think you find that it will settle to exactly where it is now. Aside from some high end boutiques, all the OEMs will sell through a dealer network.

      I think that's somewhat true, but I also think that what the dealers will look like will be somewhat different. They'll end up competing with the few OEMs (like Tesla) that control their buying experience, and frankly, the buying experience through those operations is superior. There's not a human on earth who enjoys dealing with car dealers, so as soon as any cracks in the system show, they'll have to change their ways. They definitely won't go away (for reasons you mentioned), but they'll probably start looking more like retailers and less like the hellscapes they currently are. Toyota will be saying, "We have to compete with Tesla on price and quality, but we also have to deal with the hit that comes from a miserable buying experience." The threat that Toyota will start selling directly will definitely put pressure on Toyota dealers to up their game.

      And the car buying process continues to get easier and more transparent.

      I think this will be the game changer. I bought 2 of my last 3 cars through CarsDirect. Reasonable straightforward price that's easy to check, no negotiation or games. My last car was delivered to me at my office with the paperwork. If I had to guess, I'd say we're going to move more and more toward that model and the only people who haggle at the dealer are going to be the real sharks who aren't profitable to haggle with. Once that starts to happen, the incentive for having a staff of professional hagglers goes away. Eventually, I expect prices will normalize and dealers will have to differentiate on other factors.

      --
      An interesting anagram of "BANACH TARSKI" is "BANACH TARSKI BANACH TARSKI"
    24. Re:Better Question by rahvin112 · · Score: 2

      Dealers are very well entrenched at the local political level. Most dealers are some of the richest and most connected people in their local markets. Many states have laws written around dealers and basically granting them monopolies over car sales.

      As Tesla has discovered in Texas, getting these laws removed from the books is near impossible because of how well connected dealers are.

    25. Re:Better Question by rahvin112 · · Score: 1

      Not just car sales, car manufacturing is being disrupted as we speak. Elon Musk is going to do long term damage to the car companies that refuse to move into the future. He's already hurt the sales of the high end automobile and hurt these manufacturers. The rapid fire attempts to build electric cars by the luxury brands are the signs of the damage he's doing.

      These companies don't publish sales numbers but I'm willing to bet he's taken at least 1/4 of their business by how quickly they are trying to respond to a market they all said was pointless two years ago. In fact I can remember statements by Porsche a couple years ago that the electric car is a joke, bet it's not funny anymore!

    26. Re:Better question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The problem with that argument is that the car SALESMEN only get a commission on the vehicle sale. They don't get commissions on repairs, so there's really not an incentive for the salesman to sell a lemon. It's the service department's SERVICE WRITER who gets repair commissions.

    27. Re:Better Question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't know. Tesla as an OEM wants to sell directly. I guess there would be others as well. Let the market decide?

    28. Re:Better question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Because theoretical capitalism includes all costs - all actors are rational, and know full well the value of less tangible costs (like environmental, and worker conditions).

      In theory, theory and practice are the same thing.
      In practice, they are not.

    29. Re:Better Question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Depends on the car manufacture. Audi for instance will allow you to do just this. Design your car online, pick all the options you want, order it, even lease or pay for it through AoA (Audi of America) and you can pick it up anywhere you want in the US.

    30. Re:Better Question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You do know that it is currently the other way around, direct selling by OEMs is illegal.
      So you don't know what OEM would prefer.

      Maybe OEMs just want to sell cars via the internet and maybe have a few showroom in major cities.
      Tesla wants to do this, why do you think other OEMs don't?

    31. Re:Better question by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Regular maintenance, parts which wear out, and liquids which are consumed or degraded during the process of the engine running.

    32. Re:Better Question by darthsilun · · Score: 1

      >For an import you might have to wait six to nine months to get it.

      Yeah. Getting a Ford or GM from Mexico takes times. If you want a Nissan, Honda, or Toyota, well, those plants are all in the US. Hell, all three of those are within day-trip distance for me.

      Buy Honda. Buy American.

      Toyotas, Hondas, and Nissans built in North American plants aren't imports, right?

      And off hand I'm not sure why anyone would want to special order a low-end, cookie cutter car like the Aveo.

    33. Re:Better Question by NormalVisual · · Score: 1

      These companies don't publish sales numbers but I'm willing to bet he's taken at least 1/4 of their business by how quickly they are trying to respond to a market they all said was pointless two years ago

      Yes, the companies do publish sales numbers. You just have to know where to look.

      According to Elon Musk, Tesla sold a little over 33,000 cars by the end of Q3 this year. Cadillac sells more than that in less than two months. Lexus and Mercedes are at 249,956 and 249,890 respectively for the year through Q3.

      1/4 of their business? Hardly.

      --
      Please stand clear of the doors, por favor mantenganse alejado de las puertas
    34. Re:Better Question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Buy Honda. Buy American.

      Why on Earth would someone want to buy an American product?

    35. Re:Better Question by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

      It seems like the simplest solution would be a ban on manufacturers offering services and parts directly to the public.

      As a guy who does all the maintenance on my cars myself, I'd just like to say fuck you.

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    36. Re:Better Question by tompaulco · · Score: 1

      I find dealerships very annoying because they don't want to sell you the car you want, they want to sell you one of the cars they have on the lot that day! Apparently their goal with every customer is to have them buy something the same day, not come back later to pick up the actual vehicle they wanted. Why can't I order a vehicle with everything I want from the manufacturer, and go pick it up at the plant or port of entry myself, saving the $800 in "destination fees"?

      Well, duh, they are paying insurance and interest on those vehicles, as well as maintaining them, washing them, letting you drive them which lowers the value. Further, there are incentives from the factory for moving already built merchandise, rather than special order merchandise. Can you honestly say that being in the same circumstance you would not at least TRY to sell the ones on the lot first?

      --
      If you are not allowed to question your government then the government has answered your question.
    37. Re:Better Question by Noah+Haders · · Score: 1

      Toyota doesn't compete with Tesla. They're exactly 0 customers who say, should I get a Toyota? Or maybe I should get a Tesla?. Don't let your hard-on for Elon musk cloud to you too simple economics of the wholesaler and retailer model.

    38. Re: Better Question by Copid · · Score: 1

      Dude, I was saYing they'd have to sell them to retailers, not that they couldn't sell them at all. The question was how to prevent a hypothetical manufacturer from monopolizing the repair business if it wanted to. Chill the fuck out.

      --
      An interesting anagram of "BANACH TARSKI" is "BANACH TARSKI BANACH TARSKI"
    39. Re: Better Question by Copid · · Score: 1

      That's true today. Not in a few years. Don't let your hatred for Tesla blind you to the fact that the big auto companies will not be the only game in town forever. Well. ..maybe they will, but only if they succeed in keeping stupid regulations like the franchise requirement in order to minimize innovation and keep the auto retail market stagnant.

      --
      An interesting anagram of "BANACH TARSKI" is "BANACH TARSKI BANACH TARSKI"
    40. Re:Better Question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Under your proposed model, commodities would only be available for the short period of time after those farmers had harvested them. No storage, no long distance delivery. The rest of the year you do without.

      Stuff is only available while shops are open. When night comes, you do without. Unless you bought enough for it to last to the next day. And before shops were common, you bought food for a year from some millers/farmers, and stored it yourself. This was not hard.

    41. Re:Better Question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except that Uber just is a taxi service. They do have a nice app, though!

    42. Re:Better Question by toddestan · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't be so sure about that. I would have to imagine that Tesla has been taking sales from Lexus. The Lexus LS and the Tesla Model S are both larger sedans that are very similar in terms of price.

    43. Re:Better Question by worldthinker · · Score: 1

      It's actually the network of autodealers that don't want this to change. They are the ones spearheading legislation to lock out direct to consumer sales.

  7. buy a used e-car by turkeydance · · Score: 1

    from the owner. cheaper and easier. avoid the dealer.

    1. Re:buy a used e-car by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Even worse. Because then you know you're getting crap.

  8. Next line of thinking by karnal · · Score: 2

    "Would you like to buy the lifetime software upgrades for only 10 easy payments of $99.95? It's non-tranferrable."

    --
    Karnal
    1. Re:Next line of thinking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      * Where "lifetime" is considered 12 months.
      * Side effects may include nausea, internal bleeding, flatulence, and increased risk of death.
      * Terms and conditions apply.
      * Your home may be at risk if you don't keep up repayments

      Do you wish to opt-in to our marketing partners contacting you regarding deals we think you'd like but have absolutely nothing at all to do with what you've just bought? Y/N

      P.S. While you were reading this we took all the money out of your wallet, because we're greedy and want to rinse you for every last cent.

    2. Re:Next line of thinking by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Who's lifetime? Mine or the software's?

    3. Re:Next line of thinking by tbannist · · Score: 1

      Actually, it's the lifetime of the echo of the words just spoken...

      --
      Fanatically anti-fanatical
  9. Yea blame the salesman by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Or maybe people don't want to buy a more expensive electric with too many idiosyncrasies. With gas being cheaper the payback is taking longer for a electric and the resale trade in values are junk. Not enough buyers. People want gas or hybrids at the most, I am friends with a car salesman and he says nobody asks for a electric and if they do they don't find them attractive for the money vs a gasoline vehicle of similar type. The perceptions will have to change with more customers not the car sales people.

    1. Re: Yea blame the salesman by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...and this one will leave you stranded if you're not completely OCD about charging. But that's just a matter of perception. Think of it as an "unplanned prolonged rest stop".

    2. Re:Yea blame the salesman by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      Of course blame the salesman. This problem isn't just about electric car. It's also about cheaper versions of gas cars. That also includes all of the stupid "dealer add ons" they indulge in. Some of these are consumables that only last for the first year of the car and jack up the price significantly.

      My favorite one is the "nitrogen filled tires". [breathes in deeply]

      I was interested in a car that was already on the lot but I had to out wait the stupid salesmen on my last car for about 4 months before they actually broke down and sold it to me.

      I would find it less bothersome to pay MSRP and order it directly from the factory.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    3. Re:Yea blame the salesman by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      , I am friends with a car salesman and he says

      car salesman lives matter

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
  10. Sell direct to consumer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Seriously, with the internet's access to information, the sooner the dealer model of car sales and distribution can be obsoleted, the better. I walked into a dealership with CASH IN HAND to buy EXACTLY THE CAR I KNEW I WANTED, and it STILL TOOK 4+ hours to walk out the door. And this dealership was the one that promised me the fastest turnaround on exactly this purchase.

    1. Re:Sell direct to consumer by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      I walked into a dealership with CASH IN HAND to buy EXACTLY THE CAR I KNEW I WANTED, and it STILL TOOK 4+ hours to walk out the door.

      Did you get the TruCoat?

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
  11. Less service? by Locke2005 · · Score: 1

    I'm not sure the average service cost is that much less when you factor in replacing a $4000 battery pack every 8 to 10 years. Also, there are high end SUVs that cost even more than the low-end Tesla Model X at $80,000.

    --
    I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
    1. Re:Less service? by jopsen · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure the average service cost is that much less when you factor in replacing a $4000 battery pack every 8 to 10 years.

      Well, that's a single big expense.. It's not a yearly visit to check oil every year...
      Granted I don't know much about cars, but don't eletric cars still need winter tires, aren't there still moving parts that needs oil, etc?

    2. Re:Less service? by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 2

      I don't know how the expected lifetime service cost shakes down; but what the dealership cares about is the margins on the service and maintenance they perform; not the absolute cost.

      I would suspect that battery swaps, while they involve a very expensive part, would be pretty unexciting for the dealer. Unless the manufacturer is extraordinarily tight-lipped, the price of the battery will become public knowledge; and the procedure for swapping it out(while it might require equipment that makes DIY impractical, depending on where the battery is located and what needs to be lifted) should be rigidly documented and leave little room for variation in how much labor you can bill for.

      Somebody has to do the swap, and presumably they won't do it for free; but there is little room either for value-added expertise(as with problems that require diagnostic work) or just plain sleazy invoice padding(as with problems where the customer doesn't know the cost of the parts, or which parts are necessary, or what the expected labor time is); it's a rigidly scripted drop-in replacement of a single module.

    3. Re:Less service? by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      ppppfffft...

      I only go to the dealer for the every 30K service. The more frequent stuff I do at whatever "jiffy lube" happens to be most convenient on that particular day.

      Going to the dealer for everything is too much of a bother.

      That's one reason I would avoid crummy American brands and over hyped luxury brands.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    4. Re:Less service? by Firethorn · · Score: 1

      Granted I don't know much about cars, but don't eletric cars still need winter tires, aren't there still moving parts that needs oil, etc?

      You only need winter tires if you're in a location that experiences winter. Even then, for most of the USA good quality all-seasons* are more than sufficient. You still need to replace them though.

      Yes, there's generally still 'lots' of oil in an electric vehicle. However, the reason engine oil needs to be replaced so often is heat and contamination. The heat breaks down the oil eventually, and the byproducts of combustion contaminate it, which is why you need a filter.

      The oil in a properly operating EV never gets that hot though, and is thus treated more like gear oil - so it's like the oil in your transmission, gear boxes, etc... Which is generally changed out far less often.

      Regular maintenance items an EV needs: Tires, wipers, wiper fluid, cabin air filter, lights, etc...
      Regular maintenance that an EV doesn't need: Engine oil, coolant, brake pads*, air filter, spark plugs, etc...
      Maintenance that's more expensive on an EV: Replacing the battery, but costs are coming down 'quickly'.

      *EVs still have brake pads, but regenerative braking cuts their usage enough that a pad designed to last around a decade for a regular vehicle lasts the lifetime of an EV.

      *Disclaimer: ~2" of snow and today I had to push a woman in a tiny car who had gotten stuck in the middle of the road because she was driving on half-worn 'all seasons' that were 90% summer tire.

      --
      I don't read AC A human right
    5. Re:Less service? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nobody really knows how long they'll last, it's a new technology and there isn't 8-10 years of electric battery history to go off of. From what I understand, most Generation 2 Prius batteries are still holding up after 12 years.

    6. Re:Less service? by CrimsonAvenger · · Score: 1

      *Disclaimer: ~2" of snow and today

      Where I live, 2" of snow would mark the coming of the next Ice Age....

      --

      "I do not agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it"
    7. Re:Less service? by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      Where I live, 2" of snow would mark the coming of the next Ice Age....

      Where I live, 2" of snow would mark the coming of Halloween.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    8. Re:Less service? by Firethorn · · Score: 1

      Yeah, we had more than 2" already before Halloween, it's just that we got a fresh 2" today.

      --
      I don't read AC A human right
    9. Re:Less service? by ksheff · · Score: 1

      Well, that's a single big expense.. It's not a yearly visit to check oil every year...

      You should check the oil in your car more often than once a year.

      --
      the good ground has been paved over by suicidal maniacs
    10. Re:Less service? by Jack+Griffin · · Score: 1

      I keep my cars for about 5 or 6 years, so for me (and most people) this is not a problem.

    11. Re:Less service? by rahvin112 · · Score: 5, Informative

      Every car I've ever owned has had more than $4k in maintenance costs by the time it's 10 years old. The water pump, the timing belt, flushing the transmission, flushing the radiator, etc... amount to a pretty penny. But the oil changes alone are going to net you more than $1000 in that timeframe. You get one major part going out on a combustion car that requires the engine to be disassembled and you'll drop $1k before they even know what's wrong. Yea if you do all your own maintenance you can save money on stuff but mechanical engines break down over time.

      And from what I've seen of battery replacement information the only batteries failing at 8-10 years are the NiMH batteries in the Prius. The lithium-ion in the more advanced vehicles have not exhibited the same failure rate and currently have a very poorly understood failure rate because not many have failed.

    12. Re:Less service? by Cederic · · Score: 1

      regenerative braking cuts their usage enough that a pad designed to last around a decade for a regular vehicle lasts the lifetime of an EV

      Interesting. Where can I get these pads with a decade lifespan? Mine usually last a few months.

    13. Re:Less service? by NormalVisual · · Score: 1

      The factory pads on my 2002 GMC Sierra half-ton pickup lasted 10 years - a little over 105,000 miles. My 2007 Elantra (87,000 miles) still has the original pads with plenty of meat left on them.

      --
      Please stand clear of the doors, por favor mantenganse alejado de las puertas
    14. Re:Less service? by Cederic · · Score: 1

      You and I drive very differently then :)

      Mine tend to last under 20k miles, and I seem to need new discs every 30-40k.

    15. Re:Less service? by NormalVisual · · Score: 1

      Mine tend to last under 20k miles, and I seem to need new discs every 30-40k.

      Yikes. I replaced one of the rotors on the truck when I did the brakes, but that was mostly because it was faster and more convenient for me to replace the rotor than to take it someplace and have it resurfaced. The other three were fine.

      What kind of pads do you have? My truck came with semi-metallics and I replaced them with the same, but a lot of cars come with cheap organic pads that don't last very long.

      --
      Please stand clear of the doors, por favor mantenganse alejado de las puertas
    16. Re:Less service? by Cederic · · Score: 1

      Erm. Whatever Mercedes provide as standard on the non-AMG SLK.

      But bear in mind my driving occasionally includes a 12 mile stretch of twisty country lanes that leave the brakes smoking.

    17. Re:Less service? by NormalVisual · · Score: 1

      But bear in mind my driving occasionally includes a 12 mile stretch of twisty country lanes that leave the brakes smoking.

      That could factor into things a bit. ;-) And I'm guessing your Mercedes didn't come with cheap crappy pads.

      --
      Please stand clear of the doors, por favor mantenganse alejado de las puertas
    18. Re:Less service? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You should switch to Honda or Toyota and you won't have to spend $4k on repairs. I drive them for business and I put 250k miles on each one before selling it on. In almost a dozen cars I've never had a serious repair.

      Timing belts and water pumps used to get changed at 100k miles for about $375, but now they last the life of the car. I never flush anything because it doesn't accomplish anything.

    19. Re:Less service? by Carewolf · · Score: 0

      I'm not sure the average service cost is that much less when you factor in replacing a $4000 battery pack every 8 to 10 years. Also, there are high end SUVs that cost even more than the low-end Tesla Model X at $80,000.

      The whole article is a planted Tesla story. There has been no issue wiht dealers selling electric cars, many of them have never had the chance, because Tesla doesn't let them. Also many of them doesn't have repair shops, and certainly doesn't profit from them because the only repairs people get done at the dealer are those covered by the dealer due to warranty.

    20. Re:Less service? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A battery swap can be a bit tricky, because:

      1. It is the heaviest part of the car - comparable to an engine. A large box, usually with tight tolerances. And it have spots that won't support its weight too.

      2. It is a high-voltage battery. Batteries cannot be "turned off", they always present a voltage at its terminals. Not a problem with low-voltage phone batteries - something else entirely when it is 3-4x the voltage of your wall sockets. It will happily and effortlessly deliver you a few hundred horsepower when your wrench slips and touch a terminal - and can keep going for hours. Even a 12V battery in good condition can melt a screwdriver - the difference with high voltage is that you can't let go of the metal while this goes on. :-(

      The "interested amateur" will be able to do it, but only the kind of man who won't mind replacing an engine on his own either. Dealers won't see much competition from DIY people. They may see lots of competition from independents though - just as they see with easy stuff like tire replacement.

    21. Re:Less service? by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      Depending where you live you might need only one set of tires, California e.g only summer tires, north Norway or Alaska perhaps only winter tires.
      Anyway, in moderate zones all round tires are probably the easiest way to go for.
      Regarding, oil, no electric vehicles don't need oil. Combustion engines mainly need oil for heat transport and ofc. in the burning chamber for the chafts.
      Bottom line they should need less replacements, e.g. no clutch, no gears, no fuel pump ...

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    22. Re:Less service? by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      Depends on the car, or its age.
      Before the first 30k km the oil was once checked at the first service interval (I believe 16k km), afterwards every 2 years or after every 30k km.
      The oil was changed twice, once around 16k km, once around 85k km.
      Peugeot 307, built 2003, Diesel.

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    23. Re:Less service? by Locke2005 · · Score: 1

      Have you tried not driving like an a-hole? Most cars come with brake pads that will last 100,000 miles under "normal" use.

      --
      I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
    24. Re:Less service? by Locke2005 · · Score: 1

      10k oil change interval is pretty standard on newer cars, and the usual usage estimate is 10k miles per year.

      --
      I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
    25. Re:Less service? by Locke2005 · · Score: 1

      Doesn't Tesla have an undercar robot that will do a battery swap in a few minutes now? Yeah, replacing the batteries in the trunk takes a while, and Honda won't even let me replace my own batteries in my hybrid, despite explaining to them that I have a degree in Electronics Engineering and experience as an electronics technician.

      --
      I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
    26. Re:Less service? by Locke2005 · · Score: 1

      All the Hondas I've owned just need oil, filter, tire, and wiper changes before 100k (unless someone hit it). At 100k, you need to put 3 or 4 thousand worth of maintenance into them, and after that they need a lot more.

      --
      I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
    27. Re:Less service? by Cederic · · Score: 1

      In which case 60,000 mile warranties wouldn't exclude standard wear and tear such as tyres and.. brake pads..

    28. Re:Less service? by Firethorn · · Score: 1

      But bear in mind my driving occasionally includes a 12 mile stretch of twisty country lanes that leave the brakes smoking.

      That would do it. What can I say, it was a forum post, the 'under normal usage' should have been implied. People do not normally smoke their brakes that often.

      --
      I don't read AC A human right
  12. Extrapolating from two anecdotes by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 2

    Not exactly the most rigorous analysis I've seen.

    --
    #DeleteChrome
    1. Re:Extrapolating from two anecdotes by _Sharp'r_ · · Score: 0

      The summary links three different left-wing (for the US) news sources complaining about dealers because electric car sales aren't as high in the US as their wishful thinking believes they should be.

      In October 620K cars were sold in the U.S., of which 10K were plugin electric. That's right, 1.6% of cars. That's not counting the trucks, minivans, SUVs,etc.. Heck, they sell twice as many luxury (not regular) SUVs a month than plug in cars.

      How about for a reason they don't sell, almost nobody wants to buy one because they don't make economic sense for the vast majority of people who want to use their cars more for driving places then making an expensive environmental fashion statement? Without taxpayer subsidies, virtually none would be sold. Even with subsidies, it's more economical to buy a gas car, even if you include the gas and total repair costs for both over their effective mileage life.

      People aren't stupid, but environmental elitists at the NY Times, Mother Jones and Green Car Reports think they know better than all the car purchasers out there what they should be buying and if they aren't buying it, it must be some sales guy's fault. What a load of B.S...

      --
      The party of stupid and the party of evil get together and do something both stupid and evil, then call it bipartisan.
    2. Re:Extrapolating from two anecdotes by Kohath · · Score: 1

      But above average for the news media.

    3. Re:Extrapolating from two anecdotes by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Just because the summary is based on an anecdote doesn't mean that these practices aren't common knowledge. These people make their lives on maximising their own profit. They don't work for car companies, they work for themselves.

  13. I know the /. groupthink is anti-dealer... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    ...and the laws requiring cars to be sold through dealerships are ridiculous, BUT I can't be the only one extremely concerned about how all modern technology is becoming a set of black boxes that are made as hard as possible to maintain by anyone other than "authorised" - often not third party - repair shops. This applies for everything from cellphones to cars. To me, one of the main reasons to own an item rather than lease it is that I get the opportunity to apply either my own expertise to it or that of someone who is worthy of my business through merit, rather than through hoop-jumping compliance with manufacturer rules and licensing charges.

    For example, where are the standards for electric car batteries, such that one can choose among providers, and swap them between cars? The battery pack is effectively a consumable on almost every single device manufactured. I've driven cars for a decade where I haven't had to replace any expensive parts, but I understand a Tesla battery pack would not last so long without needing replacement. This wouldn't be so bad if I could replace it like a tire/tyre, but I can't.

  14. This is a nonsequitur by larwe · · Score: 1, Flamebait
    Car manufacturers, apart from those couple of specialized boutique electric-only manufacturers, DON'T particularly want to sell electric cars. They want to sell *cars* period. They make electric cars for two reasons: a) to game their CAFE numbers (and for this, it doesn't matter if the cars go straight into a shredder off the production line - they only have to be manufactured, not sold), and b) so they can issue press releases saying "we make the greenest car in the world, here's a 15 second video of polar bears frolicking on the snow to show our veracity". Even those car dealerships that are directly between a hemp sandal store and Whole Foods don't see a huge percentage of people coming in off the street asking for an electric car - electrics still aren't a good general-purpose solution in almost all of the United States.

    This whole bleating rant is a lot of noise from a tiny minority of vociferous hippies who think that alternative cars would JUST BE MAGICAL if only PEOPLE WOULD BELIEVE. They want dealers to *proselytize* electric running shoes, not simply be knowledgeable about them.

    1. Re: This is a nonsequitur by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This. A million times this.

    2. Re:This is a nonsequitur by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Car manufacturers, apart from those couple of specialized boutique electric-only manufacturers, DON'T particularly want to sell electric cars.

      That's true.

      Which is the problem.

      They want to sell *cars* period.

      No, they want to make revenue, period. In the form of profits.

      And therein lies the rub.

      Even those car dealerships that are directly between a hemp sandal store and Whole Foods don't see a huge percentage of people coming in off the street asking for an electric car - electrics still aren't a good general-purpose solution in almost all of the United States.

      I don't know about almost all of the United States, but let's care about the people.

      Most people think that the range of their car is somehow important.

      This is actually untrue. The average commute is under half an hour. Most people have dozens of stores within easy range of an electric car.

      They don't need to travel hundreds of miles on a charge most of the year.

      It's only when they think they need to drive to go on vacation that it matters.

      This whole bleating rant is a lot of noise from a tiny minority of vociferous hippies who think that alternative cars would JUST BE MAGICAL if only PEOPLE WOULD BELIEVE. They want dealers to *proselytize* electric running shoes, not simply be knowledgeable about them.

      Nope. We'd like them to be decent and honest, not the scummy greedy shits that they are.

      Sadly that might not happen without a lot of blood in the water.

    3. Re:This is a nonsequitur by larwe · · Score: 0
      "The average commute is under half an hour."

      This irrelevancy is the crux of the problem here. That's true. But people don't JUST use their car for commuting and therein is the issue. Electric cars are unusable for anything *OTHER* than your daily commute. They can't be used for the family road trip, for hauling purchases from that exciting little Amish sale 200 miles away, or for anything else. Hence my comment that they are not general-purpose vehicles. They are very specialized hive vehicles.

      Gasoline vehicles are available in a huge variety of styles and capabilities, such that a consumer can make an intelligent selection of a vehicle that will cover most of his/her use case decently well - as opposed to the one or two EVs on the lot, which can do a fairly good(ish) job on one use case, and are totally useless for all others.

      Electric vehicles are activist novelties.

    4. Re:This is a nonsequitur by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Car manufacturers want to sell cars but the current business model has been running for many decades
      the manufacturer make the car and the leave the worry of the sales to the dealer whom is enticed to sell it because they are high maintenance money making machines
      An electric car may not be 0 maintenance but an electric motor is a much simpler engine than an ICE even assuming battery changes every ten years, how often people change cars?
      Electric cars are not magic by any means but they are far easier to repair and electronics are cheap
      Compare the electrics of most ICE cars which looks more like witchery than technology

    5. Re:This is a nonsequitur by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This irrelevancy is the crux of the problem here.

      I'd be less annoyed with you if you hadn't cut out the rest of what I wrote.

      For some odd reason. It's like you didn't want to reply to it. Here it is again:

      The average commute is under half an hour. Most people have dozens of stores within easy range of an electric car.

      They don't need to travel hundreds of miles on a charge most of the year.

      It's only when they think they need to drive to go on vacation that it matters.

      Feel free to finish reading the whole bit. Then explain to me why the average person's most frequent use of their vehicle is irrelevant.

      That's true. But people don't JUST use their car for commuting and therein is the issue. Electric cars are unusable for anything *OTHER* than your daily commute.

      A broad claim there. But ok, let's consider this, should we make decisions based on our day-to-day lives, or compromise ourselves for extremely unusual circumstances?

      Should one buy a truck when you might need it twice a year?

      They can't be used for the family road trip, for hauling purchases from that exciting little Amish sale 200 miles away, or for anything else.

      Leaving aside your overbroad claim at the end, you named two exceptional circumstances that are not general at all, but specialized. And they can be addressed, if desired. Perhaps even more easily, depending on what purchases you want to haul away.

      Hence my comment that they are not general-purpose vehicles. They are very specialized hive vehicles.

      I find your reasoning to be unfathomable. You give exceptional usages as a reason to invalidate the general-purpose nature of an electric vehicle?

      How does that work? It seems rather silly to me. Like the people who buy the big honking trucks, you're seeking to solve rare problems instead of your daily needs.

      A Swiss Army knife may be a wonderful tool, but a good simple knife may be what you need more often than not.

      Gasoline vehicles are available in a huge variety of styles and capabilities, such that a consumer can make an intelligent selection of a vehicle that will cover most of his/her use case decently well - as opposed to the one or two EVs on the lot, which can do a fairly good(ish) job on one use case, and are totally useless for all others.

      Electric vehicles are activist novelties.

      Except the lack of electric cars on the lot is a reflection of perception, not in itself a factor controlled by anything to do with electric cars.

      Companies don't build the cars because they don't think enough will be bought so the public never bothers to demand it.

      But the public? Find out how many of them would be well served by a car, how many should not be buying trucks and giant SUVs.

      Or consider it irrelevant, so you don't have to think about it. Just like the automobile manufacturers.

    6. Re:This is a nonsequitur by larwe · · Score: 1
      "But the public? Find out how many of them would be well served by a car, how many should not be buying trucks and giant SUVs."

      And this is why I didn't bother to reply to the rest of your message. This is activism. Some people - many people - WANT trucks and SUVs. And it's their right to buy them. You need to realize that you're part of a tiny minority of people who cares about this thing - what exactly you care about I can't say for sure, but it's not something the majority of people care about. Most people - I may say, NORMAL people - want a thing, and that is a valid commercial end in itself. Proselytizing them into buying your particular flavor of holy grail needs to be recognized for a religious conversion activity it is. I repeat what I said in my original post: activists think that the population will find these devices magical IF ONLY THEY CAN BE MADE TO BELIEVE. Problem is, there is no reason for anyone to believe what you want them to believe.

    7. Re:This is a nonsequitur by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      "But the public? Find out how many of them would be well served by a car, how many should not be buying trucks and giant SUVs."

      And this is why I didn't bother to reply to the rest of your message.

      I think the why is rather different.

      Because it's something you want to desperately avoid addressing. You're just coming up with a far fetched excuse to torture it into an acceptable form of reasoning.

      Really, you couldn't do a better job of convincing me you have no genuine interest in a reasonable discussion than this kind of characterization where you avoid any of the real discussion that could be had.

      But hey, you want to play that game, let's play it.

      This is activism. Some people - many people - WANT trucks and SUVs. And it's their right to buy them. You need to realize that you're part of a tiny minority of people who cares about this thing - what exactly you care about I can't say for sure, but it's not something the majority of people care about.

      You're right, only a tiny minority of people care about actual reasons to have a truck or SUV, and you're not realizing what it means.

      It means people who buy it without thinking about it are doing something when they should take the time to care, to ponder, and consider.

      But they won't. They'll just buy a big ole truck and never do any greater hauling than a Christmas Tree...which itself is a form of commercialization that ought to make Jesus weep.

      Most people - I may say, NORMAL people - want a thing, and that is a valid commercial end in itself. Proselytizing them into buying your particular flavor of holy grail needs to be recognized for a religious conversion activity it is. I repeat what I said in my original post: activists think that the population will find these devices magical IF ONLY THEY CAN BE MADE TO BELIEVE. Problem is, there is no reason for anyone to believe what you want them to believe.

      Wow, you're trying your desperate best to avoid facing the real issue here. But you're making your case worse in your fervent efforts, if only you could realize it. Yes, people want lots of things. People can be easily persuaded to think they want something, or just confuse themselves. Taking the time to contemplate? That's something to be avoided it.

      Which is exactly what many people exploit it. Especially when it comes to car sales. People even think the SMELL of plastics is somehow an attractive part of purchasing a vehicle. Or the sound of an engine. Which at its base roots, may have some basis in reality, but unfortunately, both of them are far too easy to exploit as any number of aromatic and acoustic methods exist to fool people. To get them to believe what somebody wants them to believe.

      Even though the beans aren't magic. The goose doesn't lay golden eggs. The Emperor has no clothes.

      But somebody who will be glad to commercialize things will, without conscience, tell you what you want to hear. And thus the magic continues.

      Or is it more of an evil curse?

      Are you sure you want to play this game, larwe? Because you are losing badly.

    8. Re:This is a nonsequitur by mark-t · · Score: 1

      It's only when they think they need to drive to go on vacation that it matters.

      Or if you didn't fill up/recharge last night because you forgot or what have you, and can't make it to work in the morning on what you have. With a gasoline car, it amounts to a brief five minutes of additional time on the way to work to fill up and you are good to go... with no need to think about it for several days.

    9. Re:This is a nonsequitur by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's only when they think they need to drive to go on vacation that it matters.

      Or if you didn't fill up/recharge last night because you forgot or what have you, and can't make it to work in the morning on what you have. With a gasoline car, it amounts to a brief five minutes of additional time on the way to work to fill up and you are good to go... with no need to think about it for several days.

      OTOH, once you get into the habit of connecting the charger, no need to go to a gas station at all.

      But assuming it is a problem, there are several solutions. The first is the car itself contacting you to tell you to put it on the charger, which is relatively easy to handle.

      You could also have some quick charge stations.

      And of course, your employer could have a charging system at work as well.

      A more complicated option would be the car connecting a charger itself. Doable, but somewhat more work.

    10. Re:This is a nonsequitur by mark-t · · Score: 1

      Then explain to me why the average person's most frequent use of their vehicle is irrelevant.

      Because when other use-cases really exist, even though they are much less frequent, one ends up either having to own two cars, one of which hardly gets used, or they end up having to deal with renting one. The former isn't typically seen as cost effective by many (and in some cases isn't even viable on account of a lack of parking), and the latter is staggeringly inconvenient compared to just owning the car.

    11. Re:This is a nonsequitur by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because when other use-cases really exist, even though they are much less frequent, one ends up either having to own two cars, one of which hardly gets used, or they end up having to deal with renting one. The former isn't typically seen as cost effective by many (and in some cases isn't even viable on account of a lack of parking), and the latter is staggeringly inconvenient compared to just owning the car.

      Sorry, but that doesn't make it irrelevant. That's merely a consideration to weigh in the decision-making process, not making something irrelevant as was claimed.

      Not sure where you live that renting a car or hiring a mover is staggeringly inconvenient though.

      And owning a car can be quite the bother, as can owning one car versus another.

      I've seen people with big trucks, and big gas bills.

    12. Re:This is a nonsequitur by EzInKy · · Score: 1

      A Swiss Army knife may be a wonderful tool, but a good simple knife may be what you need more often than not.

      If the cost of a vehicle were the same as a swiss army knife you might have a point, but it is not. For most people though a new car is a major investment equivalent to 6 months up to a years income or even more. This makes it extremely important that they get as much value out of their purchase as possible which means they have to consider all possible use cases.

      --
      Time is what keeps everything from happening all at once.
    13. Re:This is a nonsequitur by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If the cost of a vehicle were the same as a swiss army knife you might have a point, but it is not. For most people though a new car is a major investment equivalent to 6 months up to a years income or even more. This makes it extremely important that they get as much value out of their purchase as possible which means they have to consider all possible use cases.

      And you would have a better point, if there were no increased costs to go with purchasing such a vehicle to factor into the actual "value" that you get for your purchase.

      But it's not simply a matter of buying a car and paying one price, but a rather complex examination.

      Which too many people flat-out fail to do, because well, they need, need, I tell, you, that one or two possible use cases to be addressed and can't think otherwise. They must have it. So they don't even bother to listen.

      But a car salesman? Yeah, they'll talk you into anything that gets them a bit of padding on their commission. They will tell you the importance of speed holes and a maintenance plan and who knows what else.

    14. Re:This is a nonsequitur by mark-t · · Score: 1

      You asked why it should be irrelevant, and I posited a reply.... that this is not sufficient to make the matter irrelevant to some people in your opinion is entirely beside the point. Why did you bother to ask the question when you were going to dismiss an answer that you didn't personally happen to agree with?

    15. Re:This is a nonsequitur by EzInKy · · Score: 1

      Being able to pack your family, tent, and cooler into your SUV and head for the mountains for a spur of the moment camping trip any time you wish is valuable. And, as others have mentioned, so is jumping into the family jalopy and taking a long road trip on whim. Being able to do either, and much more is freedom, and freedom is priceless.

      --
      Time is what keeps everything from happening all at once.
    16. Re:This is a nonsequitur by Blaskowicz · · Score: 1

      When you find yourself with ten people competing for two chargers at work's parking lot that's a problem, along with need and ethics of having to interrupt what you're doing, go back to the parking lot and unplug/move your car so that someone else can use the charger.

      There was an article about that very situation happening in the Silicon Valley or a similar Californian setting.
      Similarly there's irony in the electric car requiring you to have you own garage (with power that runs to it), thus likely requiring you to live in suburbs thus likely requiring you to commute by car, possibly a moderately long commute. Thus you need an electric car because you need an electric car. Same deal anyway If the car is electric or not : you pay for your car so you can go to work so you can pay for your car. (Take that as a bit of humor if you can or wish!)

      I agree with your assessment of the technical problem : the technical problem can be dealt with but there are the social, behavioral, urbanistic problems. In theory catering to the electric cars ought to be easy : it was probably harder or more expensive to take care of horses.

      A more complicated option would be the car connecting a charger itself. Doable, but somewhat more work.

      So I'm picturing a car moving to the charger on its own, like you left your horse in a stable and the horse drinks and eats what he finds there or what the workers staffing the stables bring him. Maybe some robotic solution would be used and/or the parking lot is supervised by someone who is guarding the lot, guides the cars, manages the chargers. I like that idea but too bad such an occupation might be considered too expensive, if considering a min wage full time employee (or more) is quite a cost to man a parking lot for a few dozen cars (or less, or more). But why not :-).
      That may work in some countries (I'm thinking developing ones, or Japan). In African countries or really poor areas you can have someone dusting off solar panels (and doing whatever basic, unfrequent maintenance) whereas in the first world it's not worth paying someone to go clean them...

    17. Re:This is a nonsequitur by Cederic · · Score: 1

      Not sure where you live that renting a car or hiring a mover is staggeringly inconvenient though.

      I'm going to a wedding in another city on Saturday. It's too far for the average electric car to take me.

      To rent a car I'd have to either rent it the night before (great, losing an hour of my Friday evening) or get to the wedding late (car hire place doesn't open until 9am on a Saturday).

      I'd also have to keep it hired until Sunday, as I can't return it last thing on a Saturday.

      Plus of course I can't get to the car hire place without driving or hiring a taxi. Not to mention I'm now having to stay sober enough on Saturday night that I can drive on Sunday morning.

      Then there's the paperwork. I fucking hate paperwork.

      Instead what I'm going to do is walk 12 yards from my house, get into a very comfortable car that's fun to drive, switch on the pre-programmed radio and drive to the other city.

      Sounds convenient to me.

    18. Re:This is a nonsequitur by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You asked why it should be irrelevant, and I posited a reply.... that this is not sufficient to make the matter irrelevant to some people in your opinion is entirely beside the point. Why did you bother to ask the question when you were going to dismiss an answer that you didn't personally happen to agree with?

      Did you not follow the conversation? The assertion was made above that the most frequent usage of a vehicle was irrelevant, by larwe. But I obviously doubted the validity of that claim, so I asked for an explanation from them. They didn't even attempt to try though.

      You tried to provide one, but what you managed to show was not actual irrelevancy, but a weighing test in an analysis. Which is fair enough, but does not reach to the point of the most frequent usage necessarily being irrelevant.

      Not sure why you're thinking that's beside the point, it's actually the whole point of the discussion. Why wouldn't I tell you that the answer you gave was not sufficient to demonstrate irrelevancy when the point I'm making is regarding the true consideration of the merits of electric vehicles.

      And no, I will not be accepting an argument such as yours without question or challenge.

    19. Re:This is a nonsequitur by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Being able to pack your family, tent, and cooler into your SUV and head for the mountains for a spur of the moment camping trip any time you wish is valuable. And, as others have mentioned, so is jumping into the family jalopy and taking a long road trip on whim.

      Not having to go get the oil changed in your car quite so often. Not having to have various parts and pieces tuned and fixed up. Never having to go to emissions testing and wait in line for that.

      Not having to smell the stench of gasoline being combusted.

      Freedom! It comes in many ways.

      Being able to do either, and much more is freedom, and freedom is priceless.

      Quite untrue, I'm afraid that sometimes freedom has many costs, it is tyranny that can be had on the cheap. At least, that's how it wants to appear.

    20. Re:This is a nonsequitur by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm going to a wedding in another city on Saturday. It's too far for the average electric car to take me.

      So you need more range this time, eh? How much is that worth to you? Or to put it another way, how much does it cost?

      To rent a car I'd have to either rent it the night before (great, losing an hour of my Friday evening) or get to the wedding late (car hire place doesn't open until 9am on a Saturday).

      Sounds like a local problem.

      I'd also have to keep it hired until Sunday, as I can't return it last thing on a Saturday.

      Plus of course I can't get to the car hire place without driving or hiring a taxi.

      Around here, they'll let you drop it off anytime, and they can even come to your door with one.

      Again, sounds like a local problem.

      Not to mention I'm now having to stay sober enough on Saturday night that I can drive on Sunday morning.

      Your drinking habits are an individual problem regardless of the car. At least, until we get robot cars.

      Though I suppose you could drink all you want and take some other transit home.

      Might be easier with a rental.

      Then there's the paperwork. I fucking hate paperwork.

      Yeah, so do I. Especially with car maintenance.

      Instead what I'm going to do is walk 12 yards from my house, get into a very comfortable car that's fun to drive, switch on the pre-programmed radio and drive to the other city.

      Sounds convenient to me.

      Then you factor in all the things you do for that internal combustion car that you aren't thinking about, all the costs to that other car purchase, and you wonder how much it was worth it. Oil changes. Gas station visits. All sorts of maintenance issues. And then there's the pollution.

      Though really, your car rental place seems annoying to me. Around here, they're a lot more convenient.

    21. Re:This is a nonsequitur by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When you find yourself with ten people competing for two chargers at work's parking lot that's a problem, along with need and ethics of having to interrupt what you're doing, go back to the parking lot and unplug/move your car so that someone else can use the charger.

      There was an article about that very situation happening in the Silicon Valley or a similar Californian setting.

      You mean the Charge Rage article?

      It was a bit overwrought.

      Similarly there's irony in the electric car requiring you to have you own garage (with power that runs to it), thus likely requiring you to live in suburbs thus likely requiring you to commute by car, possibly a moderately long commute. Thus you need an electric car because you need an electric car.

      Haven't seen a high-density residential development that isn't' required by zoning to have parking anyway.

      So I'm picturing a car moving to the charger on its own, like you left your horse in a stable and the horse drinks and eats what he finds there or what the workers staffing the stables bring him. Maybe some robotic solution would be used and/or the parking lot is supervised by someone who is guarding the lot, guides the cars, manages the chargers.

      Well, google is working on the former, but I was thinking a simple automatic connection. Not too difficult an engineering problem.

  15. Re:I seriously doubt... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    Except they do. They have less moving parts and the ones that are there don't burn their own lubricant, are closed to outside contaminates, and are not subject to nearly the same amount of heat and pressure.

  16. Re: I seriously doubt... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why? They don't have an engine to maintain, just a motor.

  17. Someday electric cars may be the norm by Streetlight · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Fossil fuels will increase in price again and eventually run out. This may take a long time but first the vast majority of cars will be electric hybrids and then fully electric. The one thing limiting the transition to plug in electric cars is the infrastructure of charging stations or battery exchange locations allowing long distance travel. Then again, long distance travel may done when most towns are connected by electricity powered trains and cars are only for local transportation.

    --
    In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act. George Orwell
    1. Re: Someday electric cars may be the norm by guruevi · · Score: 1

      What's limiting right now is car manufacturers failing to provide a product because electric is inherently less costly to produce and maintain than ICE vehicles thus margins are going to be a lot smaller.

      There is also no governmental support to come up with an open standard for charging across existing and upcoming brands or mandate gas stations to install a single charger per dozen or so pumps.

      Tesla is making top-end, well supported cars (ala Ferrari/Rolls Royce) for the price of an average outfitted luxury brand (Mercedes/Lexus/Cadillac) and they're getting better/cheaper daily. You can't tell me GM/Toyota or the dozen or so other manufacturers' engineers are intellectually incapable of producing something better/cheaper on existing frames in the last decade or don't have the cash if they had to steal Tesla employees to do so.

      --
      Custom electronics and digital signage for your business: www.evcircuits.com
    2. Re:Someday electric cars may be the norm by NormalVisual · · Score: 1

      The one thing limiting the transition to plug in electric cars is the infrastructure of charging stations or battery exchange locations allowing long distance travel.

      And charging time. Unless you've got a Tesla, you're going to be waiting a few hours to recharge your car. Even if you *do* have a Tesla, it's still far longer to charge than it is to fill up a gas tank.

      --
      Please stand clear of the doors, por favor mantenganse alejado de las puertas
    3. Re:Someday electric cars may be the norm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fossil fuels will increase in price again and eventually run out.

      There remains at least 3 times as much known oil still in the ground than we would be able to burn without experiencing catastrophic climate consequences, so running out of oil is mostly a theoretical concern really since we would all be dead from climate change long before we could burn every last drop of it. Those who support electric cars should be focusing on how to make the electric car more attractive to the consumer, not how to make internal combustion artificially less attractive through punitive laws or waiting for fossil fuels to "run out".

    4. Re: Someday electric cars may be the norm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can't tell me GM/Toyota or the dozen or so other manufacturers' engineers are intellectually incapable of producing something better/cheaper on existing frames in the last decade

      Of course they're capable of doing that. The problem was never the engineers but rather the management that ordered them to focus on other priorities. For example, GM ordered their engineers to design the cheapest possible parts that would still satisfy the warranty period, but just barely! So an engineering success in that context would be a very cheap part that failed exactly one day after the warranty period expired, maximizing spare parts sales while minimizing warranty claims.

  18. I've never found it quick or easy to buy any car by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've bought two new cars and several used cars from dealers in my short 40 years as a driver.
    The new cars took several hours to negotiate. The used cars took somewhat less, but not a whole lot less.
    (I suppose things would have gone more quickly if I just had just written a check for the asking price.)
    In my experience buying a car has never been "easy."
    FWIW, both times I bought new the sales droid would not shut up about the stereo system. I'm pretty sure they're just following a script, whatever it happens to be, e.g. the $15/month maintenance package.
    The next time I buy a car I'm just going to walk in with a check and tell them they've got one hour to sell me the car I want and if we haven't closed a deal in sixty minutes I'm walking.

  19. Battery Pack by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I would rather pay installments/insurance for a battery pack replacement. Spreading the cost over the running lifetime of vehicle.
    DrE

  20. Electric, hybrid or gas, they don't know shit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Doesn't matter what kind of car you are buying, the salesmen don't know shit. There are of course exceptions with the high end car brands, or the car enthusiast in a transitional job. Most car salesmen are not car people. They don't know shit about cars, how the engine works, how the suspension works, how to drive, etc.

    You can't train someone to be a car guy and study all the new tech, subscribe to all the car magazines . . . just like in IT where the market was flooded with people entering the workforce for a paycheck without passion.

  21. Re:I seriously doubt... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Spoken by someone who has never owned, driven, or repaired car.

  22. post sale service is where the profit is by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    here in boston, there are, mainly, a few mega dealers; i have been told they make their money on post sales service not the sale itself

    i bought a camry last year
    I did a lot of test drives of a camry, accord, subaru, ford,
    i was *astonished* at how little the salesguys know

  23. Re:I seriously doubt... by onkelonkel · · Score: 1

    I seriously doubt..... that you know anything about maintaining cars, electric or I/C.

    --
    None of them can see the clouds; The polished wings don't care.
  24. Too much explaining require? Really? by Feral+Nerd · · Score: 2

    Industry insiders say that electric vehicles do not offer dealers the same profits as gas-powered cars, they take more time to sell because of the explaining required, and electric vehicles may require less maintenance, undermining the biggest source of dealer profits — their service departments.

    Electric cars are the future, gasoline guzzling cars are not. Anybody who thinks like that should join the same support group frequented by all those people who bet their business on film cameras being the future because "it takes too long to explain to customers how them them newfangled digital cameras work". Anybody who puts in the effort to push electric cars today faces an uphill struggle but also stands a good chance to gain market share down the line at the expense of established dealers who are to short sighted to bother with new technology.

  25. *shrug* by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Fuck the dealers, let them lose their jobs and die of starvation. Seriously, it would be great - their families can be evicted from their homes and they can experience starvation, thirst and cop harassment ... possibly forever. I'd like to see that. I'd like to see a few freeze to death too, maybe.

  26. dealer = franchise by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Basically, you have to understand that a dealer is (for better or worse) essentially a combination of a franchise/distributor operation.

    Franchisees allow companies to expand fast and partially customize into different market niches quickly, by employing local capital and management focus because they don't have to be totally aligned with the main company. They also exist to help companies align to local laws.The down side of franchises is that their interests aren't always totally aligned with the main company.

    In the beginning, car manufacturers basically needed Franchisees to grow.

    Just like taxicab medallions purchased by independent drivers, franchisees put in good money for them and expected them to retain value. It's silly to think they will go quietly. It's no different than the person that worked their way through school to get a CS degree and sees their job outsourced just when they are in the middle of their career. Nobody likes being disrupted, their investment of time and money disappearing overnight. Being told to start over because you sell buggy-whips isn't a fun message to hear either.

    In the end, the auto dealers will probably lose out to anti-trust, but don't expect them to go out w/o a fight. BTW, that probably is true with the CS degree holder as well, but they probably won't fight as hard as the auto dealers...

    Such is the march of time.

  27. Re:I seriously doubt... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They obviously require less maintenance, since they don't have liquid cooling systems, engine oiling systems, etc.
    The also have many fewer parts to fail which reduces maintenance.

  28. Scum of the earth by wintered · · Score: 1

    Car dealers are the scum of the earth. When we can finally get rid of this ridiculous layer and buy goods like we buy everything else then I will be very happy.

    1. Re:Scum of the earth by jonwil · · Score: 1

      That's a very poor generalization. I have a family member who works for a dealer (has worked as a salesman and also a manager) and he is most definatly not "scum".

      Then again, this is Australia where the kind of scum tactics they can get away with in the USA aren't allowed.

  29. Have you ever met a car salesman by coolmoe2 · · Score: 1

    I amazed they even know how internal combustion engines work and you expecting them to sell cars that they don't understand at all? Good luck with that because if car salesman was not a job they would be picking up your trash. They are all usually smooth taking dumb asses.

  30. I'm going to enjoy this more than I should by Dega704 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    If you were to ask me what I like most about electric cars (and Tesla in particular), it wouldn't be the economic or environmental benefits, or even the technology.

    It's the way they are taking a long stagnant and mostly non-innovative industry and dragging it kicking and screaming into the 21st century. If the people who constantly preach about the free market truly appreciated the concept, they would know that in a legitimately free market, you either change with the times or you get kicked to the curb to make room for those who are actually innovating.

    The more they resist, the more I'm going to enjoy watching them weep and wail as they slowly become irrelevant.

    1. Re:I'm going to enjoy this more than I should by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh for some mod points right now. Right on the money.

    2. Re:I'm going to enjoy this more than I should by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > If the people who constantly preach about the free market truly appreciated the concept, they would know that in a legitimately free market, you either change with the times or you get kicked to the curb to make room for those who are actually innovating.

      What do you personally think of free markets? Are you among those who do preach about the concept?

      I'm in Canada I'd be happy to be able to import brand new Japanese vehicles straight from Japan but our government doesn't allow that unless the vehicle is 15+ years old. :(

    3. Re:I'm going to enjoy this more than I should by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Free enterprise person here:

      I have no problem with letting the market decide, except that's not what's happening here. The electric car buyers are getting refundable tax credits AND the restrictions on owning a gasoline powered vehicle are becoming ever more onerous, not because of the technology but because of punitive emissions standards established by law. You really want the free market to decide? How about cutting all subsidies on everything to ZERO and rolling the emissions standards back to just enough to prevent photo-chemical smog in the cities? No? Then stop accusing us of "standing in the way" of your beloved electric vehicles while you're damaging the market for internal combustion vehicles with punitive environmental laws. You cannot have a market that's "free" for electric cars but has the law holding back the competition, that's not really a "free" market now is it?

    4. Re:I'm going to enjoy this more than I should by jpatters · · Score: 2

      You are making a very common mistake of free enterprisors here... you are ignoring (or denying) the externalities. Government intervention is necessary to deal with this problem. Some of the interventions, such as bumper design requirements to minimize harm in collisions effect both gasoline and electric cars, while others, such as emissions and fuel economy requirements only effect gasoline cars.

      While there is certainly much to criticize about government subsidies for $100,000 luxury cars, they start to make more sense when the technology works its way down to the lower end. I would favor phasing out the subsidy based on the vehicle price, it should be $0 for anything over $50,000.

      By the way, how much do you think gasoline would cost if all the subsidies for petroleum went to $0?

      --
      "Remember, there never were pineapple-almond cookies here."
    5. Re:I'm going to enjoy this more than I should by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and the reason I enjoy it so much, is cars themselves are a technology begging to be left in the history books. There is no reason everyone has to all try to go the exact same time and squeeze down a long path to get somewhere to sit at a fucking desk just like the one they have in their home.

    6. Re:I'm going to enjoy this more than I should by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "It's the way they are taking a long stagnant and mostly non-innovative industry and dragging it kicking and screaming into the 21st century"

      So, all Uber (and similar) drivers should be driving Tesla cars? :)

  31. This problem will solve itself by Copid · · Score: 1

    ...as demand for gas burning cars drops, pinching margins on the gasoline side. At some point in the future, nobody will be buying gas powered cars at all, so dealers won't have anything to compare the electric car margins to at all.

    --
    An interesting anagram of "BANACH TARSKI" is "BANACH TARSKI BANACH TARSKI"
  32. Obligatory Responses by CohibaVancouver · · Score: 5, Funny

    This is Slashdot. Any discussion of electric cars must include these obligatory posts -

    "My daily commute is 762 miles. Therefore, electric cars are useless to anyone and everyone."

    (Variation also acceptable: "Twice a year I drive 600 miles to Phoenix. Therefore, electric cars are useless to anyone and everyone.")

    "My electric power comes from coal, therefore all electric cars are more polluting than my Grandpa's 1978 Oldsmobile Cutlass."

    1. Re:Obligatory Responses by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      But does it run Linux?

    2. Re:Obligatory Responses by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Honestly, what would keep me from considering one is not the range limitation or where the electricity comes from, but the eventual battery replacement costs.

      Everything I've read suggests that once the battery goes bad (as most batteries do), that your out 30-50% of the price of the car in replacement costs - and as a result of that, there's really not much of a used market for the cars.

      To be fair, i'm not the target market anyways since the most i've ever spent for a car is around $7000 total - not because I cant afford more, but because I'm cheap.

      Regardless, until the the total lifetime cost of ownership for the vehicle including maintenance, fuel costs, and eventual re-sell are at least on the same order of magnitude as a traditional car, a lot of people won't consider them.

    3. Re:Obligatory Responses by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      electric cars are more polluting than my Grandpa's 1978 Oldsmobile Cutlass.

      Which might still be on the road somewhere in the hands of an oldster who takes good care of it, wringing every last penny of value while enjoying many years of low-cost and mostly hassle free vehicle ownership plus cheap insurance, cheap registration, cheap replacement parts and generally cheap gas too. Grandpa is no dummy, unlike the green pot heads who are running out to lease a $40,000+ electric car.

    4. Re:Obligatory Responses by codeButcher · · Score: 1

      Can you maybe give car analogies for those?

      --
      Free, as in your money being freed from the confines of your account.
    5. Re:Obligatory Responses by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      Don't forget

      "Widespread adoption of electric vehicles will destabilize the grid and require us to build over 9000 coal power stations"

      and

      "EVs will never be economical when the battery only lasts a couple of years and costs $99999.95 to replace."

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    6. Re:Obligatory Responses by MMC+Monster · · Score: 1

      Yes, but not KDE, so you won't like it.

      --
      Help! I'm a slashdot refugee.
    7. Re:Obligatory Responses by MMC+Monster · · Score: 1

      The battery is warranted for 8 years, unlimited miles. Also covers the battery catching fire during an accident, I believe.

      The battery is NOT covered if you drain all the cells completely, however.

      Frankly, most people that own a Tesla aren't planning on owning it for that long.

      --
      Help! I'm a slashdot refugee.
    8. Re:Obligatory Responses by MMC+Monster · · Score: 1

      The other thing is, if the batteries do fail and they replace them, presumably they'll re-purpose the good cells into their PowerWalls (which don't need as good batteries as the cars do).

      --
      Help! I'm a slashdot refugee.
    9. Re:Obligatory Responses by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      At least one taxi fleet in my country is made of Teslas. If they can survive in taxi service they can survive a big trip too.

    10. Re:Obligatory Responses by burtosis · · Score: 1

      This is Slashdot. Any discussion of electric cars must include these obligatory posts - "My daily commute is 762 miles. Therefore, electric cars are useless to anyone and everyone." (Variation also acceptable: "Twice a year I drive 600 miles to Phoenix. Therefore, electric cars are useless to anyone and everyone.") "My electric power comes from coal, therefore all electric cars are more polluting than my Grandpa's 1978 Oldsmobile Cutlass."

      Yes it's true how the range argument isn't true for everyone, but has been a limiting factor for at least a percentage of use cases and buyers. At least now that problem is becoming less and less important every year as batteries become cheaper for a higher energy and power density.
      Also its true that coal powered electric cars pollute quite a bit, roughly the equivelant of 50-60mpg in many areas of the USA and in some areas like India 20-30, or china 30-40, while areas like Finland its 120+. So it is important to understand how physics and reality work if you really do want to have an enviornmental impact, in many areas you are better off buying a hybrid vehicle, efficient gas/diesel, or electric and supplementing it with a robust solar installation.
      Honestly i see electric cars as superior technology overall, the only real thing holding them back from being superior in every way is the battery. Once that component gets close to the energy density of gasoline at a reasonable price there wont be a need to foist these on anyone, people will want them because they are better in every category.

    11. Re:Obligatory Responses by burtosis · · Score: 1

      Well that battery sediment does have merit. It basically wipes out any savings over gasoline vs electricity as you wind up paying roughly the same cost per mile, but in a massive chunk instead of distributed over every purchase. It also may have a negative enviornmental impact as when the vehicle gets 8-10 years old no one may want to buy it as the cost of replacing the battery is too close to the total cost of the vehicle. It will be interesting to see what happens to the market for used electrics in the next few years as mainstream vehicles age.
      that said the total maintance cost of electrics is less than gas/diesel. It's just that it probably dosent cover the added cost of the up front cost of electrics, making them more expensive for the same performance; except for maybe the tesla, it's an excellent car sold at a loss to the company - i just hope they don't lose enough money doing that to go under.

    12. Re:Obligatory Responses by burtosis · · Score: 1

      Those are all good points. The larger tesla battery actually costs around 30k to make. However, due to the pr, use in alternate markets afterward, and subsidies, it is sold at a ridiculous discount to the consumer of around 12k. It's an insane deal for the consumer from a price standpoint, yet still is too expensive - it's the absolute worst part of a car that is otherwise close to engineering perfection. At least in a tesla I exoect them to hold their value so a 12k replacement every 10 years isn't too bad. Now a leaf is another story as that's 6-8k on a far cheaper econobox electric.

    13. Re:Obligatory Responses by Toshito · · Score: 1

      What is the range of electric cars when it's -30C?

      I need rear defrost, front defrost, and lots of heat. All this heat is not only for comfort, it's primarily to keep windows clear of ice and see outside the car.

      At those temps even in a gas powered car you have to keep the heater at full all the time. And if you're not alone in the car, chances are that even at full blast only the windshield and part of the front side windows will remain ice free INSIDE.

      And with this requirement, can I still to the 150km round trip I do every other week to go fetch my kids at their mom's house?

      And sit 6 with luggage? Because my girlfriend has kids too?

      And haul a camping trailer? For 200-500km trips, 4 to 5 times every summer? Including the last-minute, "let's go camping this weekend because the weather is gorgous, ok we have 30 minutes to pack the car and go"?

      Because if I have to loan a gas car everytime I hit one of those "exception" to "normal" driving, I'll have to loan a car 4 times a month all year long.

      And what happens when almost everybody has an electric car, and wants to loan a gas car for the weekend, holidays or vacation? Well, there will be a shortage of loan cars everytime you'll need one (or the prices will go way up because of the increased demand).

      --
      Try it! Library of Babel
    14. Re:Obligatory Responses by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The responses will shift eventually, as the electric cars gain traction (lame pun intended).
      As for me, I'm going to drive my old ICE car for the first time in 7 months, in order to get to the airport for vacation.
      If the train going there wasn't insanely expensive we'd go by that instead, and if there were two more rapid chargers on the way we'd go there by Leaf.

    15. Re:Obligatory Responses by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have 15 years of my Toyota Offroad fun truck, still haven't did anything much to the engine. Maintenance wise takes me 15 minutes of changing the oil and that's about it. Even if I did have to replace the engine off my Toyota, it's about 3k, not even close to 50% of the original cost of the vehicle. Until Tesla can beat that, I'll be interested. But as it stands out, I might as well just buy a new damn vehicle with the cost of replacement of the battery. Maybe that's what they want?

  33. Re:Easy solution - COSTCO does it better by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    Costco has a terrible car sales model.

    They "shop around" to local dealerships by getting them to give a quote for the requested model. Then they sell it to you at the lowest first-quote price of any local dealership, plus a little markup for Costco, of course. Lowest first-quote price. That's pants-on-head retarded. You at least should get a second round of quotes.

    Oh, and the best part is that they won't even bother to get a price for you unless you first commit to completing the sale with them! So you can't even go back and say "no, sorry, that's too much, try again or I'm gone". You have to buy a car from them if you get even a single quote on any car from them. I will never use Costco "services". They're shady as fuck and aren't a good price.

  34. Re:Good by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 2

    Coal powered cars are a bad idea.

    No they aren't. Coal can be converted to electricity at about 40% efficiency, and that can be stored in a battery and converted to motive power at about 90% efficiency, so a total of about 35%. A gasoline ICE has an efficiency of about 15%. If the electricity comes from NG, the efficiency is even higher. Also, coal is domestically produced, providing jobs for Americans. We don't fight wars over coal.

    Coal is filthy, and should be phased out as soon as economically feasible. But even coal generated electricity is cleaner than gasoline for powering vehicles.

  35. Eliminate Them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "That means that the appropriate question should be directed to makers of electric cars: What are you doing to make selling electric cars as profitable and painless for your dealers as selling gasoline or diesel vehicles?"

    I've done all my research online. Why should I have to pay thousands of dollars for someone to hand me the keys.
    Dealers don't want to sell electric cars. Get rid of the dealers - like Tesla.

  36. Re: I seriously doubt... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But what about the electrons? I'm pretty sure you have to have the electrons washed every few weeks.

  37. Re: Good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And I have solar on the roof which only emitted carbon when the panels were made.

  38. Re:Getting a car repair by hackwrench · · Score: 1

    Oh, want your car serviced? No problem, just conveniently schedule an appointment for 3 - 6 weeks out with our friendly regional call center representative in Bangalore. His name is Steve. Oh, and your service center will be conveniently located someplace within 50 miles of you where we can get cheap rent too. I hope the car will make it that far needing a repair and all. If not, I'm sure towing is pretty cheap too, right?

    You sound like you've never heard of the independent mechanic that as far as I can tell, practically everyone who buys a used car takes it to. If it's cheap enough for someone who buys used and might not have the money for better, then it's cheap enough for someone who has the money to buy a new car too.

  39. Fuck you car dealers! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Care dealers need to go fuck themselves. We should be able to buy cars directly online from the manufacturer!!!!!

    1. Re:Fuck you car dealers! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Some manufacturers already do. Porsche offers such services, not exactly internet online purchases, but you can call them up and request what you want and they'll even fly you over to drive it on their test track. Ford also offers the same, but less customization. It's really not far from it that and eventually they'll deliver you the vehicle to your driveway.

  40. Re:Easy solution - COSTCO does it better by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I duno, Costco in Canada is pretty solid quality and price wise. But then again they do not sell cars around here as far as I know.

  41. ObTestDrive of gas-powered car by Tesla owner by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Classic article:

    Test drive of a petrol car

    Excerpt:

    So we sat in the car and pressed the START button. The car’s gasoline engine coughed to life and started to operate. One could hear the engine’s sound and the car’s whole body vibrated as if something was broken, but the seller assured us that everything was as it should. The car actually has an electric motor and a microscopically small battery, but they are only used to start the petrol engine – the electric motor does not drive the wheels. The petrol engine then uses a tank full of gasoline, a fossil liquid, to propel the car by exploding small drops of it. It is apparently the small explosions that you hear and feel when the engine is running.

    The petrol engine consists of literally hundreds of moving parts that must have tolerance of hundredths of a millimeter to function. We begun to understand why it is car repair shops that sell the cars – they might hope for something to break in the car that they can mend?

    Whole thing is worth a read.

  42. Re:Good by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 1

    In reality, we don't fight wars over oil, either - we get the vast majority of our oil from ourselves, Canada, Mexico, Venezuela, and Nigeria. The Middle East is a very small supplier of oil for the US. Most of the ME oil goes to our allies in the EU; if we're "going to war" for oil, it's so our allies can have a source of oil.

    --
    Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
  43. Get rid of them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Fuck them. I know what I want don't need no interested recommendations.

  44. Catch-22 by kheldan · · Score: 1

    Electric cars are too expensive and too little profit because they don't make/sell enough of them, but we won't sell them because they're too expensive and too little profit. Sounds to me like someone needs to take a baseball bat and 'explain' to a few people that they're holding up progress, and to knock that shit off before someone has an unfortunate accident. Seriously, I'm getting pretty sick and tired of the almighty dollar being the deciding factor on everything. It's not science or technology or even the rank-and-file citizens that are holding up progress in areas we need progress in, it's business that's to blame.

    --
    Are YOU using the TOOL, or is the TOOL using YOU? Think about it!
  45. Better question by ceoyoyo · · Score: 3, Insightful

    A better question. Just why is it so profitable to sell gas powered cars?

  46. I don't want an electric car by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Mainly because of the plethora of choices on where I can fill up my (gasoline) car, and the lack of options for electric.

    Plus with gas prices returning to normal, I don't feel the need to switch anytime soon.

    If electric charging stations become more common, then I'll consider it.

  47. What logical reason? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We're all 3D printing cars at home, in our 3D printed houses? Right? Unless you're a Luddite?

  48. Easy answer by sootman · · Score: 2

    "What are you doing to make selling electric cars as profitable and painless for your dealers as selling gasoline or diesel vehicles?"

    What am I doing? That's easy: I'm NOT GIVING A SHIT HOW THEY FEEL. If I want to buy one, I'll walk into a dealer, and they can take my money, or not. Salesman's not making enough money? Wah wah wah, go get a real fucking job and do something USEFUL for a living.

    --
    Dear Slashdot: next time you want to mess with the site, add a rich-text editor for comments.
    1. Re:Easy answer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      "go get a real fucking job and do something USEFUL for a living."

      Whoa Whoa whoa, When we are trying to get $15.00 an hour for slinging burgers you shouldn't eat, you don't have the right to tell car salesmen to get a real fucking job and do something useful for a living.

  49. Re: Black boxes by hackwrench · · Score: 2

    The black box situation ebbs and flows. The car diagnostics apparently used to require a specialized apparently rather large computer at a mechanic to run through paces or maybe just for the code, I'm not sure, but now a car parts store will hook a handheld device up to the car to read the codes stored in the car and give you a printout of their values and meaning for free. My brother-in-law said he could fix her Kia based on the codes and explanations, what he already knew and what he could read off the internet. She had to pay $160 bucks for two coils, but look what a search turned up. I even just put in kia coil and it offered the other search terms.

  50. Re: Good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There are fuel powered generators that handle the equivalent of the power needed for electric cars, that run for eight hours on four galons of fuel. Constant load. Why aren't you calling for that? And that was in the early 90's. Surely we can do better now? And a person could pick it up with one hand and move the generator. It was about a hundred pounds, with iith its control set.

  51. Re: Good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    You totally misunderstand the value of forcing all oil to be sold in dollars. Since the world runs on oil, and countries must purchase oil in dollars, the countries of the world must keep a large reserve of dollars. This increases the value of the dollar, allowing us to offset by printing more without inflation. Fighting wars over oil is a very real thing. You just don't understand the mechanism of how this works obviously.

  52. I talked to the manager... by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

    Jerry: Yeah, but that TruCoat--
    Customer: I sat right here and said I didn't want no TruCoat!
    Jerry: Yeah, but I'm sayin', that TruCoat, you don't get it and you get oxidization problems. It'll cost you a heck of lot more'n five hundred--
    Customer: You're sittin' here, you're talkin' in circles! You're talkin' like we didn't go over this already!
    Jerry: Yeah, but this TruCoat--
    Customer: We had us a deal here for nine-teen-five. You sat there and darned if you didn't tell me you'd get this car, these options, without the sealant, for nine-teen-five!
    Jerry: All right, I'm not sayin' I didn't--
    Customer: You called me twenty minutes ago and said you had it! Ready to make delivery, ya says! Come on down and get it! And here ya are and you're wastin' my time and you're wastin' my wife's time and I'm payin' nineteen-five for this vehicle here!
    Jerry: All right. I'll talk to my boss. See, they install that TruCoat at the factory, there's nothin' we can do, but I'll talk to my boss.

    --
    You are welcome on my lawn.
  53. Re:Easy solution - COSTCO does it better by knightghost · · Score: 2

    AC is incorrect. Costco lists the price so that you can shop around. No haggling.

  54. Re: Getting a car repair by ranton · · Score: 2

    You sound like you've never heard of the independent mechanic that as far as I can tell

    You sound even worse. An independent has to specialize in a topic, like transmissions. Would you trust him to work on the cars computer system? A dealership say Ford, has to be able to work on all aspects of fords, same with gm, chyrsler and Toyota. And stand behind their repair.

    You absolutely proved him correct when you claim an independent has to specialize in a topic as narrow as transmissions. Most independent mechanics I have used have been able to work on a wide range of automobiles. There has been some very specialized work, such as with more rare hybrids like the 05-07 accord hybrid, where I have had to use a dealer in the past. But I have only had one car repair in 20 years that needed a dealer. And if dealers did not exist, the market would compensate for those rare cases in their absence.

    It is funny you stand up for dealers because of their repair services, when generally that is the department people like the least at dealerships. I thought it was general knowledge to never go to a dealership for service unless your car was under warranty. They are overpriced and refuse to use after market parts.

    --
    -- All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing. -- Edmund Burke
  55. Re:Easy solution - COSTCO does it better by TWX · · Score: 2

    They also deal with the fleet sales department rather than the retail sales department, and the fleet people just look at the numbers and figure out the dealer's markup and make a fairly quick response.

    The best technique is to buy a car out-of-state though. Sales tax is paid to your state, not to the selling dealer's state, and there is no county or city sales tax in the equation. On top of that, if your state requires that the sales tax be based on the MSRP rather than on the negotiated price, this technique makes the sales tax price reflect the actual price, not an inflated MSRP.

    --
    Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
  56. Re:Good by kangsterizer · · Score: 1

    The problem isn't coal though, it's lithium batteries recycling or the lack thereof.

  57. They're asking the wrong question by hyades1 · · Score: 1

    "That means that the appropriate question should be directed to makers of electric cars: What are you doing to make selling electric cars as profitable and painless for your dealers as selling gasoline or diesel vehicles?"

    Nope.

    The appropriate question to be directed at makers of electric cars is, "Why do you need dealers?"

    I could mention that dealerships are the Number 1 reason why a large segment of auto-owning population puts buying a car on about the same level as leaving your kids with a suspected child molester. However, just about anybody who has ever done business with a car dealership already knows this.

    --
    I've calculated my velocity with such exquisite precision that I have no idea where I am.
    1. Re:They're asking the wrong question by freezin+fat+guy · · Score: 1

      It's a little like asking what we are doing to help bullies find a new way to shake down kids who have been taught how to stop bullying.

  58. Re:Easy solution - COSTCO does it better by LordKronos · · Score: 2

    I don't know if Costco has changed the way they do it recently, but when I tried to use Costco's car service 5 years ago it certainly wasn't that simple. I went to Costco to check the price, and they told me I'd have to contact the Toyota dealer to get the price (and there was only 1 participating Toyota dealer in the area). I called the dealer up, and they absolutely refused to provide any pricing info over the phone. They wanted me to drive there...20 miles away. Let's just say I was less than impressed by usefulness of the service.

  59. Wrong question, and he knows it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    "That means that the appropriate question should be directed to makers of electric cars: What are you doing to make selling electric cars as profitable and painless for your dealers as selling gasoline or diesel vehicles?"

    No, the appropriate question is: Why does EVERY STATE IN THE US forbid manufacturers from selling direct to the public without going through a dealer?

    And the answer to that is, "Because auto dealerships, which make a lot of money, constitute such a powerful lobby that they have been able to game the system by bribing legislators to create and maintain laws that forbid direct sales."

  60. what the fuck by davester666 · · Score: 1

    "What are you doing to make selling electric cars as profitable and painless for your dealers as selling gasoline or diesel vehicles?"

    It sounds like whomever wrote the summary is basically requesting that the electric car makers should make crappier cars, so they need more repairs, so people will go back to the dealer to get them fixed.

    That sounds like a great plan.

    I see samzenpus is still working hard to make the world a little worse, every single day.

    --
    Sleep your way to a whiter smile...date a dentist!
  61. Re:Good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As a pedestrian, I would much rather stand behind a gas-powered bus than a coal-powered bus. What is this, the 30's?

  62. "The average commute" rubbish. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Talk about "the average commute", and how a car with a tiny battery pack can do it is part of the propaganda to sell gas cars and keep the electric car out of the market.

    Major auto manufacturers want people to believe that electric cars will only ever be boring, gutless city buzboxes, and that if you want a 'real car' you need one of their gas-powered models, of which they have many.

    Companies that actually want to sell electric cars, and we are pretty much only talking about Tesla here, will never talk of 'average commutes', but build their cars with large packs capable of doing most peoples inter-city travel, and work out a network of fast charging stations that will allow you to go arbitrarily large distances with brief stopovers. They also will work towards solving the battery capacity problem, which is undeniably electric cars Achilles heel.

  63. Re:Easy solution - COSTCO does it better by kelemvor4 · · Score: 1

    They also deal with the fleet sales department rather than the retail sales department, and the fleet people just look at the numbers and figure out the dealer's markup and make a fairly quick response. The best technique is to buy a car out-of-state though. Sales tax is paid to your state, not to the selling dealer's state, and there is no county or city sales tax in the equation. On top of that, if your state requires that the sales tax be based on the MSRP rather than on the negotiated price, this technique makes the sales tax price reflect the actual price, not an inflated MSRP.

    In some states, like Florida, there are some significant fees to register a car that was purchased out of state.

  64. Re:I've never found it quick or easy to buy any ca by EzInKy · · Score: 1

    The next time I buy a car I'm just going to walk in with a check and tell them they've got one hour to sell me the car I want and if we haven't closed a deal in sixty minutes I'm walking.

    I tried that with my last purchase, and salesperson was quite amicable to the idea. Sticker price was 21K, I offered 18K, we settled on 19K out the door, which I knew ahead of time was the book value of vehicle. Easy breezy, right?

    Not in the least! The back end guy was so eager to fuck me I could nearly see his hard on when I walked into his office. After going through mileage statements, warranties, and whatnot at the bottom of the stack of the requisite paperwork there was the sales agreement with the total being 22K.

    It took me nearly screaming at him to tear everything up before he would give in inch. Still pissed at myself for giving in to the "mandatory" processing fee and agreeing to 19.2K.

    --
    Time is what keeps everything from happening all at once.
  65. often ahead in the wrong direction, certainly diff by raymorris · · Score: 0

    California and Louisiana are the two states which reject the ~ 90% of laws that the other 48 states all have in common. Not the big headline political stuff, but common, everyday stuff like contract law, building and electrical codes, etc are pretty much the same in states - except California and Lousiana. So California is certainly -different- .

    In some ways certainly they are "ahead" - California isn't shy about trying out new new things, or to put it another way "imposing more and more mandates on its citizens without any way of knowing how it will work out". Sometimes it works out well, sometimes it blows up in their face.

    Overall, we can see what all the experimentation in California, the willingness to jump off ledges no-one has previously tested, has done to California's economy over the last 30 years. Some people -like- California despite the economic and other problems. That's cool. If you like California, live there. If you don't like California, don't live there.

    What I'd ask Californians to NOT do is this:
    If you flee California because you can't get a job that pays the exorbitant costs of California policies and move to somewhere that has plentiful jobs and low cost of living, DON'T bring those California policy ideas with you. If you're fleeing the results of doing things the California way, don't try to turn your new home of Texas into another California. If you wanted to live somewhere like California, you'd be living in California.

    Along the same lines, please don't try to force the rest of the country to become like California by passing a bunch of unconstitutional federal laws which flagrantly violate the enumerated powers and reserved powers clauses. We're happy to let you Californiacate in California, and we'll do it our way (with jobs, affordable homes, and safe streets), okay?

  66. Re: Good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You described the Chevy Volt

  67. Re:often ahead in the wrong direction, certainly d by whoever57 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    In some ways certainly they are "ahead" - California isn't shy about trying out new new things, or to put it another way "imposing more and more mandates on its citizens without any way of knowing how it will work out". Sometimes it works out well, sometimes it blows up in their face.

    Oh, please. You could be in Kentucky or West Virginia, where the Koch brothers are experimenting with the laws.

    Overall, we can see what all the experimentation in California, the willingness to jump off ledges no-one has previously tested, has done to California's economy over the last 30 years. Some people -like- California despite the economic and other problems.

    Yeah, I would hate to live somewhere where jobs are plentiful, where the government is running a surplus ... wait, what economic problems?

    --
    The real "Libtards" are the Libertarians!
  68. Re:Good by Jack+Griffin · · Score: 1

    In reality, we don't fight wars over oil, either - we get the vast majority of our oil from ourselves, Canada, Mexico, Venezuela, and Nigeria. The Middle East is a very small supplier of oil for the US. Most of the ME oil goes to our allies in the EU; if we're "going to war" for oil, it's so our allies can have a source of oil.

    If the ME didn't produce oil, your oil would cost *a lot* more since there'd be much higher global demand for it. There would also be much higher incentive to take or disrupt that supply
    So yeah, it was always about the oil...

  69. Re:WHAT!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Salesmen not interested in selling an inferior product?

    ROFLMFAO...yeah, kind of like the car was to the horse and buggy, you mean?

    What do you mean I have to put this awful smelling stuff in it to make it go and keep it from seizing up?!?! All I have to do is feed a horse!

  70. Re:Good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    ICE's are closer to 25% efficient-- the current F1 cars are pushing 40%.

  71. FucK the middle man go direct by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    FucK the middle man go direct, ditto for cell phones in US

  72. Rebates by Etherwalk · · Score: 1

    Dealers have a conflict of interest because manufacturers are dumb. Manufacturers have variable margins built into the cars that encourage sales. One would hope they line up with the maker's desires (or profits), but often they don't. And makers like GM that have $2000 rebates on everything almost all the time encourage buyers to avoid them when there isn't a sale.

    Rebates are mostly just there to be an accounting trick. IIRC they let you increase your Revenue on paper and maybe take a corresponding tax deduction for the promotion.

    1. Re:Rebates by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      They are a pure marketing ploy to make people think that buying a $40,000 car for $20,000 is better than buying a nicer $18,000 car for $18,000. Yes, numbers made up. But the psychology isn't.

  73. Re:often ahead in the wrong direction, certainly d by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    California isn't shy about trying out new new things

    And using your tax money to do it, no matter how dumb F*** stupid it is. Take high speed rail for instance, a $100 billion dollar boondoggle that not only will never pay for itself, but operate at an additional loss every single year it runs. High speed rail, unlike highways or freight rails, cannot contribute anything to the economy other than passenger transport which can never in and of itself be profitable, unless the high speed rail tickets are sold at $300+ per one way trip which compares unfavorably with an airplane ride over the same distance. The poor people who currently ride AmTrak in California do it not because it's fast or runs on time, but because it's dirt cheap (for the passenger, not the taxpayer) which is about the only advantage it has.

  74. Re: I seriously doubt... by rubycodez · · Score: 1

    No because you just change them out, you should put in thinner less viscous winter electrons when the cold season starts, otherwise the motors will strain more trying to the the juice flowing

  75. Fuck your dealers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Dealers made sense when gasoline engines were unreliable crap that needed service every 3k miles. Now that a technology might replace them, it's time to replace the dealer model.

    Vendor support, customer care? There's plenty of things that wear and tear on a car that need maintenance besides the engine. Someone hasn't gotten the memo yet.

    in b4 "Car Wash Technician" is a thing.

  76. : What are you doing to make selling electric cars by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Obviously, add water/oil pumps and belts to the design.

  77. Re:often ahead in the wrong direction, certainly d by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah, I would hate to live somewhere where jobs are plentiful, where the government is running a surplus

    You'll love California, they outsource more jobs and grow the deficit year after year. Plus, they've got a public employee pension time bomb that even Illinois cannot beat!

  78. Re: often ahead in the wrong direction, certainly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Totally wrong

    No transit pays for itself. Not highways, not airlines, not buses, not rail. So that's the wrong metric to measure success.

     

  79. Correct article. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Spot on. History shows that Humans would rather steal than do the hard work.

  80. Re: Getting a car repair by shugah · · Score: 1

    I just love the "buy genuine Ford/GM/Chrysler(Fiat)/Toyota/Honda parts" thing. Ford is really pushing this with ads saying you should purchase over-priced tires, batteries, headlights, oi filters, wiper blades, belts, brake pads, oil, transmission fluids, brake fluid, etc. to ensure you get "genuine" parts for your Ford. Except that Ford doesn't make any of these parts; they source them from the same OEM manufacturers are the aftermarket guys do and them mark them up twice as much. Then the dealer sticks it to you with the labour / installation fees.

    You don't need a Ford "technician" to tell you what type of tires to put on your Ford - it's written in your owners manual. Some of the OEM parts are really low quality. Ford Motorcraft spark plugs for example; use NGK, Denso or Bosch - actually anything else. When I bought my Honda, the dealer had installed really soft brake pads to improve test drive stopping performance. I had scored rotors within the first 8 months (San Francisco). I now use EBC or Hawk pads. OEM batteries are not much good in cold or hot weather (I now live in Canada). Get a DieHard or Optima. Does ANYONE use OEM branded oil?

    --
    If you aren't part of the solution, then there is good money to be made prolonging the problem
  81. California's schizophrenic for a reason by rsilvergun · · Score: 2

    It's huge, and it's basically split between a very right and a very left wing. They're mostly economically left wing, albeit with somewhat lower taxes that they get away with because of their huge economic output. Socially they're pretty conservative, with lots of "tough on crime" laws.

    It's worth noting that when they had a Republican Governor (The Governator) they ran deficits and had a softer economy in general.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
    1. Re:California's schizophrenic for a reason by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's huge, and it's basically split between a very right and a very left wing. They're mostly economically left wing, albeit with somewhat lower taxes that they get away with because of their huge economic output. Socially they're pretty conservative, with lots of "tough on crime" laws.

      Fucking love guns, but cool with gays (so long as they don't marry) and weed. What a melting pot! And don't forget they got that new movie starring the Rock!

  82. It probably helps by rsilvergun · · Score: 1

    not having little explosions propelling 2000+ lbs of steel, glass and plastic.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
  83. I will say this about stagnation by rsilvergun · · Score: 1

    my brother and I went to a dealer to buy a car. He used to be a used car salesman and I wanted him with me. He commented that they were using the same tactics he used 15 years ago. Hadn't changed a bit.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
  84. To be fair they are by rsilvergun · · Score: 1

    worst polluters than my Grandpa's car. That thing hasn't run since the 80s and is probably in a junk yard somewhere. At least the electric car sometimes leaves tire prints.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
  85. They're not too expensive by rsilvergun · · Score: 1

    they don't have good incentives for the Sales people. Microsoft had the same problem with their phone. Google/Apple gave spiffs to get sales folks to steer them to their phones. Microsoft didn't. So the Sales folks buried the Lumina into the deepest, darkest crevices of the store. Sony had the same basic problem with the PSP Go. I remember the hilarious demo units at Best Buy with no software whatsoever loaded on them. Just the menus and that was it.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
    1. Re:They're not too expensive by kheldan · · Score: 1

      This is what distresses me about things like this though: We're not talking about toys like phones here (don't get mad; that's what they more-or-less are anymore are toys to keep people amused and distracted). We're talking about something that will, in fact, change the world, and it's being treated with disdain at best, and bald-faced contempt and hatred at worst. We need to move away from internal combustion engines and towards electric. The change will literally be good for everyone, but the bridge-trolls won't let anyone cross unless they pay the toll (by buying more IC engine vehicles). They have a monopoly and that monopoly needs to be taken away from them despite their objections so this technology can more readily get into the hands of consumers, which will mean electric vehicle manufacturers will have more money to work with, which means both better vehicles will be produced and the price to the consumer will go down, all while going a long way to cleaning up the air we're breathing. Car salesmen at old-style dealerships can either get on board or go work at Walmart for all I care. Unlike coal miners (not a random reference; heard about the last coal mine in Britain closing down soon on NPR this morning) someone who has a career in sales can apply their skillset pretty much anywhere, so they get little-to-no sympathy from me anyway.

      --
      Are YOU using the TOOL, or is the TOOL using YOU? Think about it!
  86. Re:Good by mattwarden · · Score: 1

    Rig count is down due to low oil prices. Supply is so much greater than supply that land storage is full and traders are paying tankers to sit idle and just serve the role of sea storage. Existing wells are running at the minimum required to cover the owning company's debt payments.

    Saying the oil would cost "a lot more" if ME didn't pump is a big oversimplification. It would cost more, but the biggest problem right now is major oversupply relative to demand, so the price increase is really just ending desperation liquidation pricing.

  87. You've never sold cars by rsilvergun · · Score: 1

    the trouble is folks waste your time asking questions. It's right there in the summary. A good salesman could move 2 gas powered cars in the time it takes to do 1 electric. For all their bitching people enjoy wasting Sales people's time. Want to move electrics? Run a gov't program to spiff the sales man (with some new minimum wage laws so the dealers don't steal the money with pay cuts).

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
  88. Re:often ahead in the wrong direction, certainly d by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you flee California because you can't get a job that pays the exorbitant costs of California policies and move to somewhere that has plentiful jobs and low cost of living, DON'T bring those California policy ideas with you. If you're fleeing the results of doing things the California way, don't try to turn your new home of Texas into another California. If you wanted to live somewhere like California, you'd be living in California.

    I'm from Chicago but have lived in Los Angeles the last four years. It's great, and I can't imagine going back. Mistaken policies and willingness to change and try new things are FAR preferable to fees and taxes associated with cronyism and the general crookedness of Chicago. [Disclaimer: I absolutely love Chicago, I just happened to relocate based on circumstances.] There's a whole shit ton of sour grapes regarding California.

    There's plenty of work and reasonable housing in CA -- just not directly on the coast where everyone wants to live. Those prices are because it's fucking beautiful and there's not enough of it (that whole supply and demand thing). If you are willing to live even 10 miles inland, prices halve or more. If you're willing to live 20 miles inland, shit's chepa. And if you're willing to live somewhere resembling Texas, you can live in the shithole desert of CA for cheap. Hell, you could move to slab city
    more or less for free.

  89. Re: Good by mbkennel · · Score: 3, Informative

    We don't force oil to be sold in anything at all.

    It's that the sellers of oil prefer to be paid in dollars, because then they can do something with that money which is relatively safe and secure.

    In any case, the bond market is much bigger than the petroleum market, and that is the source of dollar, and euro, dominance.

  90. Re:Good by dryeo · · Score: 1

    The AC makes a good point. Note that the evil countries, excepting N. Korea, are all oil producing countries that have tried to use other currencies then the US$ to sell oil. Saddam it was Euros, Gaddafi, it was a gold based currency. Iran also has been using Euros.
    America gets a lot of benefits from the Petrol Dollar including printing money like crazy and running a huge debt while having a stable currency and being able to afford a huge military to prop up the Petrol Dollar.

    --
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverted_totalitarianism
  91. Re:Easy solution - COSTCO does it better by FlyHelicopters · · Score: 2

    That is a dealership to avoid and never go to...

    It has been a long time, many years, since I purchased a car in person, the last few were via e-mail...

    The most recent one was at my dining room table...

    They want to sell a car, they'll make it easy for me, not the other way around...

  92. Re: often ahead in the wrong direction, certainly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Amtrak riders are FAR from being poor. The majority are either retirees or people with enough free time to spend 1 to 4 days travelling in comfortable (but breathtakingly expensive) tiny rooms, as opposed to the active hurry-up-to-wait-in-line misery of modern air travel.

  93. Though there *is* a question re: interest conflict by aussersterne · · Score: 1

    With regard to the issue of dealers, I'm not sure that it's just electric cars they don't want to sell.

    In 2013 I was in the market for a gasoline-powered automobile. Did my research, selected a make and model. It wasn't the most common car on the planet, but it also wasn't extremely rare (a mainstream Japanese car). I identified three dealerships in the metropolitan area that, according to their websites, had a model on the lot.

    I could not for the life of me get them to give me a test drive. The first dealership I visited, the salesman said they'd "lost the key" to that particular car and I couldn't test drive it or buy it that day, I'd have to come back "later." (He couldn't tell me just when "later" was.) But he put on the *very* hard sell for two other models.

    The second dealership, they claimed to have lost the car, period. No, not on the lot, they said. The third dealership, they claimed that I didn't really want that model, it wasn't reliable. When I pressed, they told me that their (brand new 2013) instance was in the shop, that's how bad it is. "Honestly," they didn't want to sell me the marque's "worst model." *They* were looking out for *me*, you see. Which is why they really, really wanted to put me in this *other* model in the showroom....

    I finally bought one online and had it driven in from out of state. It's been a great car and performed as expected with the features I needed.

    I don't know exactly what was going on when I was trying to make my vehicle purchase, but to me it screamed "conflict of interest" as they clearly didn't want to serve me, the customer, by selling me a product that I came for and that they clearly *had*.

    --
    STOP . AMERICA . NOW
  94. email lists for sale by latestdatabase5 · · Score: 0

    You can, of course, grow your list - check out some list building secrets that will be shared in my succeeding articles. List building is definitely one of the most essential and complicated tasks while running your business, but with the right list building strategies email lists for sale, it is definitely worth your time and effort.

  95. Re: I seriously doubt... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Lick my balls.

  96. Re:often ahead in the wrong direction, certainly d by FlyHelicopters · · Score: 1

    I'm from Chicago but have lived in Los Angeles the last four years. It's great, and I can't imagine going back. Mistaken policies and willingness to change and try new things are FAR preferable to fees and taxes associated with cronyism and the general crookedness of Chicago. [Disclaimer: I absolutely love Chicago, I just happened to relocate based on circumstances.] There's a whole shit ton of sour grapes regarding California.

    With all due respect, you moved from one ship hole to another, you don't have any reasonable basis for comparison...

    Come down to Texas, see something new...

  97. Re:Easy solution - COSTCO does it better by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well this. If I'm going in to buy electric car it sure is worth the sellers time to sell it to me. It's a waste of sellers time to try to introduce old and smelly cars to me, I'm buying an electric. Maybe someone else will sell me one. If sales people are too damn stupid to study what they are selling it's really their problem. If I have a feeling I know more about the subject than the seller it really might ake a lot of time to make the sell, because I won't believe a word they say (not that I really believe car salesmen anyways. What's wrong with 98% of them? Is it some kind of dead end job one step above prison sentence?).

  98. Ignorant Salesmen by Etherwalk · · Score: 1

    This +100.

    Dealers need to step aside and get out of the fucking way of the sale. It's a stupid business model. There is no value in having a middleman in this process anymore.

    There's no value in having the same business responsible for sale and service where the guys selling are not the guys servicing. There might be some value if the guys wore two hats--i.e. actual experience with the car. But ignorant salespeople don't seem uncommon. The summary mentions one buyer who knew a lot more about the car than the salesman. The last time I bought a car (used car but from a dealer), the salesman didn't even know the car had all-wheel drive, and tried to upsell an old entertainment system in a vehicle we didn't want like it was a significant feature. And that was in a *posh* neighborhood in a fairly cold climate where you could have sold the AWD.

  99. Re: often ahead in the wrong direction, certainly by Asha2004 · · Score: 1

    There are other values than direct profit. Environment for one, but also the benefits of faster transit and less road congestion. All harder and more abstract to monetize than direct profit but valuable none the less.

  100. Re: Getting a car repair by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 1

    My "genuine dealer service" accidentally put power steering fluid into my brake system ruining it.

    At first they were going to fix it but once it went north of $3000, they balked and said a prior maintenance 7,000 miles previously might have put the fluid in (since i came to them for the one 3,500 miles before).

    In the end, they gave me a verifiably good deal on a replacement new car when I pointed out they could fix the car for almost "free" since it was mostly labor.

    Since then, I always tell the service tech this happened on a prior visit before they start and I always check the fluids before I leave the lot.

    But there is nothing magical about a particular mechanic.

    I agree on the warranty. Now that I've retired I will probably be exiting 'new car land' in another 5 years and be in the land of used cars again.

    --
    She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
  101. Chevy Volts aren't really electric by Rujiel · · Score: 1

    Gas-powered above 60 mph.

  102. Parasites on the road to progress. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    From the article:
    "What are you doing to make selling electric cars as profitable and painless for your dealers as selling gasoline or diesel vehicles?"

    Can be loosely translated to
    "What are you doing to make those new-fangled cars as profitable and painless for the buggy-whip manufacturers as selling horse-drawn buggies?"

  103. I'm sure horse dealers avoided selling cars... by Chrisq · · Score: 1

    Im sure horse dealers avoided selling cars for the same reason. Much less after-sales in terms of feed, medicine, and other supplies.

  104. Bad marketing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Electric cars are not the same product that gas cars are and they are other kind of business
    So sell them at other kind of stores and let compete with gas cars vendors
    What is happening is normal and should be avoided by the marketing departments.

    it remembered me when I was approached by an employee at a hardware store saying me not to buy a chromebook because "it was not a computer" and I laugh and gave the kid a look and as he knew what he was doing he stopped. As MS WOS laptops give more money to shops being more expensive, and they charged for codecs and other free software installations plus other services Linux based OSs do not need.

  105. Vending machines? by jandersen · · Score: 1

    Vending machines, then? I would buy one there. Or how about hiring them out for a year, then selling them as used?

  106. Re:Easy solution - COSTCO does it better by NormalVisual · · Score: 1

    It has been a long time, many years, since I purchased a car in person, the last few were via e-mail.

    Same here. I decided which car I wanted, and determined exactly how much I wanted to pay, out the door. I emailed a number of dealers and explained that this was my price, and if they were willing to deal they should fax me a quote for my amount, with the key text "out the door". After doing this about six times, I got a quote from a dealer, drove down, and had the car a half hour later. They weren't real happy when they found out I already had the financing in place, but a quote is a quote. :-D

    --
    Please stand clear of the doors, por favor mantenganse alejado de las puertas
  107. Re:Easy solution - COSTCO does it better by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

    The best technique is to buy a car out-of-state though. Sales tax is paid to your state, not to the selling dealer's state

    In California, where there are the most vehicles and the most drivers, you have to pay the difference in taxes when you register.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  108. unintended consequences by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

    If the car dealerships are closed all the car salesmen will become something else salesmen. What if they end up selling computers & software? What if you have to deal with them on a regular basis? Worse yet, what if they take your boss golfing and buy him a hat?

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  109. Re:Easy solution - COSTCO does it better by CanadianMacFan · · Score: 1

    Do you not test drive the car before buying it?

  110. Re: Black boxes by geggo98 · · Score: 1

    The control units in a car have very detailed access controls. You can read some of the values directly. For others you first must authenticate. Writing values usually always needs authentication and encryption. Some values you can only change through a firmware update. This is often possible through the bus, but needs also authentication and encryption. Unfortunately it is nearly impossible to get the right firmware in the first place. Their is no interface to read it and the chips even have special hardware protections against getting the firmware. And some values you cannot change at all, neither through the bus nor when opening the device (e.g. some error flags that when toggled will void your warranty).

    Some of the devices must be registered before you can use them. Removing them without unregistering them first will increase some internal error counter. All this makes it much harder to deal with the electronics for everyone but the original manufacturer.

  111. Re:Easy solution - COSTCO does it better by NormalVisual · · Score: 1

    Yes, of course I drove the car before signing.

    --
    Please stand clear of the doors, por favor mantenganse alejado de las puertas
  112. Re:I've never found it quick or easy to buy any ca by NormalVisual · · Score: 1

    It took me nearly screaming at him to tear everything up before he would give in inch. Still pissed at myself for giving in to the "mandatory" processing fee and agreeing to 19.2K.

    No need to scream. Just say, "the agreement was 19K out the door. Not a penny more.", and walk the moment they refuse to honor that. For bonus points (and because I'm a horrible human being), tell the closer that it makes you smile thinking about him explaining to the sales manager how he let you get away that late in the deal.

    --
    Please stand clear of the doors, por favor mantenganse alejado de las puertas
  113. wrong question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "That means that the appropriate question should be directed to makers of electric cars: What are you doing to make selling electric cars as profitable and painless for your dealers as selling gasoline or diesel vehicles?""

    Thats not the right question at all....

  114. And again: why do we need car sales people even? by Pope+Raymond+Lama · · Score: 2

    In a connected world, customers can pick the cars straight with the makers - the whole article is written as if the unnecessary middle-men where a show stopper. They are the ones being stopped, and what makes one wonder is that are not gone already.

    --
    -><- no .sig is good sig.
  115. Re:Easy solution - COSTCO does it better by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I know Canada and the US do things differently, but most Canadian provinces closed that loophole decades ago. When you register the car, you either provide proof that you already paid the sales taxes for your province on the vehicle (ie: your bill) or you pay the sales taxes on the sale price at the MOT (DMV for Americans). If the sale price you quote sounds shady (in the province's opinion), the province, at any time, has the right to bill you taxes based on the black book value *or* you may take the vehicle to a provincial registered car appraiser (at your expense) and pay the taxes on the appraised value (this can be useful for relatively new beaters, such as lemon cars or vehicles that were in accidents but did not have their "FIT" title revoked). That even applies if you have a real bill of sale, but it's for, say, $1.

    If you do not do this, you may still own the car, but it will not be plated to drive on the road. So you'll need to tow it (all wheels off the ground). Occasionally that's not a problem, if it's a track car or it's going to be used at a farm/junkyard as a service vehicle. There are usually tax exemptions for transferring vehicles within the immediate family, but only 1 or 2 exceptions per year.

    As for getting your money back from the other province, good luck. That's your problem and few provinces or states offer sales tax refunds. Some are nice enough to let you not pay it in the first place if you can prove the vehicle is leaving the state/province. Oh, and yes, you do pay tax on the tax if you're billed tax. Enjoy!

    I don't see any reason a US state couldn't just implement the same thing.

  116. Car Dealers by seven+of+five · · Score: 1

    Car dealers have always been one of the least pleasant parts of car ownership, and things like consumer protection laws were a reaction to that fact. That they balk at selling electric cars -- that the economic deck is stacked against them -- means that car selling needs fundamental changes. Tesla's been insightful in their sales model -- they did their homework.

  117. Re: often ahead in the wrong direction, certainly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Every state has ship holes and everything is bigger in Texas

  118. Bullshit! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Time is money, aka cost. Dealers will simply add the cost into the price of the car. This is especially simple when there is little competition and supposedly high demand for the vehicles.

    Supposed high demand is the critical point. a couple of outliers does not constitute high demand.

    Also, if you think any car salesman knows jack shit about what he's selling you're deluded. They know nothing. They simply regurgitate, with an authoritative tone, what they were told to say in training and what they've heard other sales people saying. A parrot has no knowledge.

  119. Don't need to be sold one. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I need to see it in real life. Walk around it and touch the materials (please do not bother me at this time).
    Then i need you to hand over the keys for a short testdrive before i am ready to order one.

    I don't need some slimy car salesman to pitch me packages i will not buy. Or tell me things i can read in the brochure fine myself.

  120. Re: Good by flogistic · · Score: 2

    We don't force oil to be sold in anything at all.

    No one is saying the US is forcing anyone to sell oil in dollars. After all, we have a clear example of a country switching oil sales to the Euro with no major consequences.

  121. Now that i've got the money for a new car by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I still wont buy one because fuck dealerships.

    The old subaru still runs fine.

  122. Here's the answer by khallow · · Score: 1

    There's a simple one word answer to why car salespeople don't like electric vehicles, options. The car manufacturer sells the car and publicizes a recommended price. The dealerships are thereby very limited as to how much they can charge for the base car itself. Thus, most of their profit comes from everything else that they can sell on top of that base car, the "options". This can be fancy protective coatings, electrically powered systems (brakes, steering, windows), A/C, nitrogen-filled tires, bling hubcaps, fancy service plans, etc.

    An SUV with a massive power source can be packed fill of high margin bling and options while a skimpy electric vehicle can't. Bottom line is that car dealerships and their salespeople get much more profit per SUV than they do per electric car. That completely explains the dislike for electric vehicles.

  123. Re: Getting a car repair by tompaulco · · Score: 1

    You sound even worse. An independent has to specialize in a topic, like transmissions. Would you trust him to work on the cars computer system? A dealership say Ford, has to be able to work on all aspects of fords, same with gm, chyrsler and Toyota. And stand behind their repair.

    I wouldn't trust an auto mechanic to work on my cars computer system, whether shade tree or genuine Ford service. Unfortunately, by computerizing cars to the hilt, they have made it where you have to pretty much throw away a $40,000 vehicle if something goes wrong in the software or firmware. Oh, they will continue to try replacing this thing or that thing until you go broke, but it is far cheaper to just leave it on the side of the road and go buy a 1990s vehicle that somebody can service.

    --
    If you are not allowed to question your government then the government has answered your question.
  124. Not selling cars by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    First, and most glaring omission is taking at face value that car dealers sell cars, and make money on service.

    They make money selling loans. The car is a "vehicle" for the loan.

    It's pretty easy to see why people get this mixed up, but it's a point that is never discussed as it should be.

    Rather that "car dealers" they should be know as "car loan dealers".

  125. The money isn't in the car itself... by kenh · · Score: 1

    As noted in the article, it is the service department where dealerships make their money. If they could, I bet many dealerships would forgo car sales entirely and focus on repairs exclusively. We had such a dealership where I used to like, they kept about 5 cars in stock, anything new was ordered from factory or from another dealership and 90% of their revenue came from repairs.

    --
    Ken
  126. Re:often ahead in the wrong direction, certainly d by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Head down to this tiny little town in Southern California. You might have heard of it. It's called Los Angeles. I'm originally from there, any time I have to go back, I'm always reminded about what a terrible place that is. I've never seen so many empty store fronts. Not really a surprise though. It's amazing, you go to a restaurant and you can't get service because you're waiter/waitress isn't really an waiter/waitress, but they're an aspiring actor. You can't walk anywhere, it's all too damn far away and you're terrified of getting run down by somebody paying no attention to their driving. Everything is insanely crowded. You remind yourself that just because you can't see them, there really are mountains over there. And the people. God, the people. A bunch of self important pricks. And ridiculous laws. I was staying in a hotel that was apparently known to cause cancer in the state of California. They've got so many damned warning labels on everything that they become meaningless. I felt they should move that hotel out of California so it would stop causing cancer. That state is literally the worst place on earth that I've ever been. And I grew up there, so we're not talking about a week or two that I spent there. It's the quintessential lack of foresight. Hell, I remember prop 8 with the whole banning gay marriage thing and the idiots in that state were all screaming how it was the Republicans who passed it. And in the same breath screaming how they done so well getting the minority vote to come out in record numbers, apparently having their heads crammed so far up their own asses as to not realizing that the minority vote in California means the Hispanic vote, a vote which is predominately a catholic vote, which isn't likely to vote in favor of gay marriage. Yet no, it wasn't their lobbying of the Hispanic vote that outlawed gay marriage, it was somehow the Republicans, in what may be the most liberal state in the country. California is a country of idiots.

  127. Re:Good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What lack of recycling? Electric cars needs lots of lithium - extracting nearly pure stuff from worn out batteries sure is cheaper than digging extremely diluted minerals out of the ground.

    There may be few such businesses right now - only because there is not yet a large volume of worn-out car-size batteries. But all current batteries will die sometime in the future, and then you have the necessary initial volume to start such a plant.

  128. I'm a Volt Owner by BravoZuluM · · Score: 1

    I can attest that the Volt's maintenance costs are limited to tires and, oil changes every year and a half. I have 60k miles on mine after 3 years of driving. The batteries are as strong as the day I bought it. Ridiculously great commuter car. Road trip car? Not so much. I rent a gas car when I go on road trips.

    The 2016 Volt offers a direct drive engine so the long drive may be fine now.

  129. Re:I seriously doubt... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I do, and I tend to think overall cost wouldn't be as dramatic as people seem to like to paint it. Problems with the electrical systems, brakes, AC, wipers, tires, stuff like that is the big costs. The actual maintenance on the engine itself, other than oil changes, don't happen very often. My car, after 4 years had to finally have a decent service done on the engine, and it was a $500 service. Most of the rest of the maintenance I've had to do would apply to electrics as well. And fact is, if something went catastrophically wrong with the engine and it needed replaced, it'd cost about the same as a new battery pack in an electric. And from what I've read, the warranty on engines is about on par with the warranty on battery packs.

  130. Maintenance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "electric vehicles may require less maintenance, undermining the biggest source of dealer profits"

    bullshit...

  131. It's because they cost twice as fucking much. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Compare a Chevy Volt to an compact car. The compact car costs half is much, has 2-3 times the range as a Chevy Volt. It's also a friggin compact car. People aren't going to pay top dollar for a tiny car. Dealers don't like to carry cars that won't sell and be forced to carry inventory that they might have to sell at or below cost. That's why they aren't selling and dealers don't want to carry then.

    You slashtards thing it's one big fucking conspiracy against electric cars when its actually the fact that electric cars cost way too fucking much and do too little for the average car buyer. It's a failure of the electric car technology. But that truth clashes with your world view, so you'll ignore it. It's all a matter of costs, the lack of range, and slow charge times. That's it. You are not going to fix it anytime soon, so go stick your fucking head in the sand and claim its all conspiracy to sell vehicle service... And just wait until that battery replacement comes too. Your 8 year old electric car will have a resale value of nearly zero because cost of the pending battery replacement will exceed the value of the vehicle.

  132. Re: Good by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

    We don't force oil to be sold in anything at all.
    Yes, you do.

    Why do you think the Shah was disposed?
    Why do you think Venezuela and Lybia became blacklisted?

    The Shah bluntly refused when Nixon tried to force him to only sell for dollars, Venezuela and Lybia where some of the first nations accepting Ecu (the artificial bank only european currency before the Euro), that was the start when the realy felt into disgrace.

    Nixxon abandoned the gold backing of the dollar and forced all third world countries to only sell oil for dollar.

    As retaliation the OPEC was formed: "you want us to take dollars, then we define how much we take!"

    It was an uproar in the USA when in the late 80s more and more countries announced to accept Ecu/Euro as well.

    Perhaps you like to check how much the dollar has lost versus the DM/Euro the last 30 years ... since oil is sold over 50% for Euro instead of dollars.

    --
    Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
  133. not my experience by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've got a 10-yr-old Toyota Matrix. Over that time it's had two oil changes a year, a single more extensive fluid replacement, new front brake pads, plus a new set of tires. Maybe $2K in total over 10 yrs.

    Realistically I expect this to start going up as the car ages, but so far it's been rock solid.

  134. Re:Good by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

    You are also oversimplification ... in fact oil production is on a rise, there is no drop:
    http://peakoilbarrel.com/world...
    http://crudeoilpeak.info/lates...

    --
    Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
  135. Consumer ignorance by prisoner-of-enigma · · Score: 1

    It's beyond me in this day and age of ubiquitous information available at one's fingertips that anyone can walk into a dealership and NOT know what they want to buy (or at least have it narrowed down to one or two models and/or trim levels). You should do all your research BEFORE going to the dealership. The only point of going to the dealership should be to actually drive the car and confirm or refute what you already know about it.

    Dealerships HATE informed customers because it basically removes the need for a salesperson. I don't WANT some smelly guy in a bad suit trying to tell me what I want. I already KNOW what I want. The only reason I'm even there is because I can't order one from the factory directly. I have my financing worked out with my credit union before I set foot in his doorway. The salesperson's total interaction with me ought to be "Here is a filled-out build sheet for the car I want along with all options I would like. Here is the price I'm willing to pay which ensures a modest profit for you and your dealership. I will not negotiate one penny above and beyond that, nor do I want to be sold on additional options or extras I have not already specified. Please locate the car in your database. If you have one on the lot that matches it, I'll take it today. If not, please have it delivered here and let me know when it arrives. Thank you. Goodbye."

    Why in the hell can't we just ORDER these things from the factory??? Oh, right...car dealerships have local politicians blocking that sort of thing. Land of the free, home of the brave-but-not-so-brave-that-we-want-actual-competition.

    --
    In the end they will lay their freedom at our feet and say to us, Make us your slaves, but feed us. - Fyodor Dostoyevsky
  136. Remember the Merkur? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A generation ago, a similar situation doomed Ford's "BMW-killer", the Merkur. The Lincoln-Mercury dealers handling the car in the U.S. were accustomed to selling and servicing big iron with big V-8 engines, and were basically clueless about these strange new imports. My dealer replaced the turbo twice under warranty, when the real problem was a valve cover gasket. Fortunately there was an active and knowledgeable owners' club with a great newsletter. I got accustomed to explaining what the problem was and how to fix it whenever I took the car in for service.

  137. Plentiful? Unemployment worse than 80% by raymorris · · Score: 1

    > Yeah, I would hate to live somewhere where jobs are plentiful

    California ranks 41st for unemployment. 80% of the country is doing better.
    http://www.bls.gov/web/laus/la...

    I suppose that if you're accustomed to the mess that California has been for 30 years, having more jobs than West Virginia seems "plentiful" in comparison. The simple fact is, few states have unemployment as bad as California does, even as California has "recovered" from third-world rates.

  138. Re:Easy solution - COSTCO does it better by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

    A good solution to that problem is to simply not live in Florida. FloridaMan is constantly in the news about something.

  139. Re:often ahead in the wrong direction, certainly d by Sardaukar86 · · Score: 1

    WARNING: The above post contains an opinion known to the state of California to cause cancer.

    (sorry, couldn't resist)

    --
    ..Mullah or Pope, Preacher or Poet, who was it wrote: "Give any one species too much rope and they'll fuck it up"?
  140. Re: often ahead in the wrong direction, certainly by Sardaukar86 · · Score: 1

    Totally wrong

    No transit pays for itself. Not highways, not airlines, not buses, not rail.

    Corporate Welfare may be a real thing but I don't think it's quite as extensive and generous as you appear to believe. Buses and rail services may well attract a subsidy but I don't know of many subsidised airlines.* These companies exist to make money.

    How do they not 'pay for [themselves]' if they're turning a profit?

    * I may simply be ill-informed of course.

    --
    ..Mullah or Pope, Preacher or Poet, who was it wrote: "Give any one species too much rope and they'll fuck it up"?
  141. Re:Easy solution - COSTCO does it better by rch7 · · Score: 1

    In Florida you pay sales tax when you register car if it isn't paid already. So much for the tax evasion schemes.

  142. Re:Easy solution - COSTCO does it better by rch7 · · Score: 1

    Yes sure, it is better in California, with 11-13% extra state income tax and bubbled out to stratosphere real estate prices :/ At least in Florida they have such natural phenomena as "RAIN" that makes local vegetation green. You probably are not aware about such thing in CA :/

  143. Re:Easy solution - COSTCO does it better by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

    Real estate prices are ridiculous everywhere these days, unless you live in some backwater where there's no employment. Cheap real estate isn't of much use if you're unemployed, unless you're retired.

    As for rain, you sound like you've never been to northern California. How do you think all those forests grow? The pictures I've seen of Florida only show palm trees, same as southern California.

  144. Re: Good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There is a theory that the US invaded Iraq because it had started pricing its oil in Euros.

  145. Get rid of dealers.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "That means that the appropriate question should be directed to makers of electric cars: What are you doing to make selling electric cars as profitable and painless for your dealers as selling gasoline or diesel vehicles?"

    I'll tell you what they are doing. They are getting rid of the "dealer" middleman entirely. Why the hell would I buy an electric car from anyone else other than the manufacturer if that other person has nothing to offer me in additional benefits to justify the higher cost?

    I'm going to give the dealer another x% just because he has a nice showroom? Do they understand that showrooms are dinosaurs now?

    Last time I bought a car from the dealer, they showed me the pamphlet with all the options, but when I told them these are the options that I wanted, they said there was nothing available and that it would take 6-12 months to order it. And this wasn't anything special, it was a Dodge Neon, so pretty basic stuff.

    Dealers make out like they are representatives of the manufacturer, but in reality all they are is leaches, waiting to separate you from your money for no good reason.

  146. Re:Though there *is* a question re: interest confl by Lord_Jeremy · · Score: 1

    Subaru?

  147. Re:Easy solution - COSTCO does it better by rch7 · · Score: 1

    Maybe in Northern, but most are crowded in Southern. Last time I had phone conversation they were talking about water restrictions and some copters going over to spy who's lawn is too green ;)))

    As for the employment, it depends what kind of work you do. Unqualified work is cheap in California and unemployment is high. Most likely you will get about the same close to minimum wage if you work in some retail position like Target or Walmart whatever state you are in. In Southern CA metro areas you would need to live in a shack then, and send your kids to similar public school. Sure you would earn somewhat more in Silicon Valley IT position comparing to most other places and would have bigger employment choice. But most likely not more enough to compensate for higher taxes, living costs and time spent in traffic jams.

  148. Re: Getting a car repair by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

    I've never done anything with power steering fluid, so genuine questions:

    What's the difference between power steering fluid and brake fluid? They're both hydraulic fluids, right. So why are they of different kinds? Are they different consistencies?

    How would you check which they've put in, before leaving the lot?

    Why would it require anything more than draining and flushing the brake system? I did that myself on the driveway at home when I was young and cheap. About an hour's work for an amateur.

  149. Re: Getting a car repair by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 1

    Brake fluid is clear to brown and slick (in my car it's clear).
    Power steering is reddish or light brown and thin (in my car it is reddish).
    Transmission fluid is reddish or magenta and smells sweet
    Oil is amber.

    I tell the service rep what happened before and that I'll be checking before I leave the lot. (this is the most important part)
    When done, I get the service rep and we pop the hood and check each of the fluids to make sure they look/smell/feel right (this is less important since the car is probably screwed at this point anyway).

    http://www.agcoauto.com/conten...
    "They design the rubber used in the braking system for high pressure sealing. Manufacturers also design this type of rubber for use only with brake fluid. Severe damage results from even the smallest amount of petroleum-based fluid added to the brake system. Oil-based fluid causes the rubber in the braking system to swell and very rapidly deteriorate.

    The most common mistake is adding power steering fluid to the brakes*

    power steering fluid will swell and deteriorate brake seals
    Power steering fluid contamination will cause seals to immediately begin swelling. As the seals swell, they move forward and block the passages that allow the brake system to function. One example is the return ports in the brake master-cylinder. The swollen seal blocks this port and the return of fluid to the reservoir, when we release the brake pedal. "

    * this is what happened to me.

    --
    She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
  150. Re: Easy solution - COSTCO does it better by easyTree · · Score: 1

    You're probably right. Which dealership do you work for, we'll come to you.

  151. Re: Getting a car repair by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

    Wow! Thanks for the heads up.

  152. Re: Good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We don't force oil to be sold in anything at all.

    FYI, we invaded Iraq because they switched to the petro-Euro.

  153. Re:I seriously doubt... by toddestan · · Score: 1

    They also lack complicated emissions control systems, and there's no exhaust system to rust out either (may not be an issue for you depending on climate). Regenerative braking reduces wear on the brakes. The battery is obviously an expensive wear item, but even factoring that in I'm guessing the electric is still significantly cheaper to maintain.

  154. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion