Should we limit the training time athletes may invest? After all, you shouldn't have to destroy your career to have a chance at winning (these are, after all, supposed to be amature athletes).
It's time to take the gloves off. Let the Olympics be a spectacle of what the human form (which intrinsically includes human technology) can do. Bring on the biotech!
For a wide scale deployment, they'd almost certainly have to add capacity that didn't exist before.
Distributing 4GB to lots of people isn't trivial, and that's ignoring the marketing fact that most people wouldn't be willing to do so in the first place.
And they decided that Apple's tiny market share wasn't worth holding the product back for. At least they warned you, they'd be well within their rights to say nothing and blame Apple for selling mislabeled drives.
Demanding a label most certainly is making a statement about safety. If it's just about information, why not also label the astrological sign the animal was born under?
You have a right to whatever you're willing to pay for. I'm sure you'll be able to find someone willing to sell you non cloned meat.
You managed to spew six paragraphs of verbal diarrhoea without addressing the real issue. Why should your superstition about biotech carry more weight than kosher superstitions?
Labelling it necessarily implies there's something wrong with it. Besides, where do you draw the line? Should we require non kosher meat to be labelled so?
Of course not, we simply allow those who want it to buy from suppliers who voluntarily label. Don't ask me to fund your superstition.
You're asking for a minor and irrelevant part of the meat's history. If you luddites want non-cloned meat, there is absolutely nothing preventing you from paying for it.
Don't try to force sane, reasonable people to do so.
I don't give a damn. If *you* want non cloned meat *you* can pay extra to get it. You can die in a fire before you make me pay for labels to assuage your superstitious technophobia.
Sane, rational people do not oppose atomic energy. The only people who don't consider it green are the technophobic wingbats who'd like to see us revert to a hunter gatherer lifestyle (and you'd better not be using flint tools).
Slashdot Mirror
They're supposed to have guide rails, and Apple's don't. Otherwise this story would be about slot loading drives, not Macs.
They're described as "Combo Drive (DVD-ROM/CD-RW)" on Apple's website.
I'm perfectly fine with people replacing their legs to compete.
We'll also include in that list machine grown food, air travel to the games site, physiotherapy...
So he should be barred from competing, so it's fair to me.
Calling them DVD drives certainly does that, and really, not coming clean with the fact that they're *not* is enough.
Should we limit the training time athletes may invest? After all, you shouldn't have to destroy your career to have a chance at winning (these are, after all, supposed to be amature athletes).
It's time to take the gloves off. Let the Olympics be a spectacle of what the human form (which intrinsically includes human technology) can do. Bring on the biotech!
Should people with longer legs be disqualified for the same reason?
They quite clearly call it a DVD drive, but it is not one.
Of course it would only be useful to have text dead centre, but a vague blur to the side could tell you that there is something to read.
For a wide scale deployment, they'd almost certainly have to add capacity that didn't exist before.
Distributing 4GB to lots of people isn't trivial, and that's ignoring the marketing fact that most people wouldn't be willing to do so in the first place.
And they decided that Apple's tiny market share wasn't worth holding the product back for. At least they warned you, they'd be well within their rights to say nothing and blame Apple for selling mislabeled drives.
They've specifically said they wouldn't support Apple's non compliant hardware, which Apple dishonestly marketed as compliant.
From boycotting non labeled meat.
Demanding a label most certainly is making a statement about safety. If it's just about information, why not also label the astrological sign the animal was born under?
You have a right to whatever you're willing to pay for. I'm sure you'll be able to find someone willing to sell you non cloned meat.
You managed to spew six paragraphs of verbal diarrhoea without addressing the real issue. Why should your superstition about biotech carry more weight than kosher superstitions?
Labelling it necessarily implies there's something wrong with it. Besides, where do you draw the line? Should we require non kosher meat to be labelled so?
Of course not, we simply allow those who want it to buy from suppliers who voluntarily label. Don't ask me to fund your superstition.
You can't "selectively focus" on documents where the author is actively trying to hide things from a casual reading.
You're asking for a minor and irrelevant part of the meat's history. If you luddites want non-cloned meat, there is absolutely nothing preventing you from paying for it.
Don't try to force sane, reasonable people to do so.
I don't give a damn. If *you* want non cloned meat *you* can pay extra to get it. You can die in a fire before you make me pay for labels to assuage your superstitious technophobia.
They're taking our jeorbs!
They're complaining that people are doing just that.
Any opposition to nuclear power is implicit endorsement of coal generated power.
You'll have to seal yourself in a cave, so you don't release methane when you decompose.
Sane, rational people do not oppose atomic energy. The only people who don't consider it green are the technophobic wingbats who'd like to see us revert to a hunter gatherer lifestyle (and you'd better not be using flint tools).
Writes some good near future sci-fi (Accelerando and Halting State). You should also check out Vernor Vinge's Rainbows End.