How many people would appreciate a society where this type of act (any social engineering for large value crimes) was impossible? I was wondering if that would mean fingerprint readers and badges for everyone, everywhere, all the time.
Wondering also if a nearly perfect solution would be to never trust anyone without (and reading it first) paperwork.
Comments?
Doesn't anyone else (if anyone is still reading this thread) find the fact that the new reserved words, are context sensitive? That yield may still be used as an identifier in non-sensitive places. Just me, but I thought that language class I took years ago would have said thats a 'bad thing' for readability.
Slashdot Mirror
Not IBM; Lenovo, and will the Chinese government be able to now stop noisy bloggers better?
come on, put in spoiler alert!
Is this intended to possible eliminate those who so willing to jump to Vista? ;-)
i thought radio waves were orange, and the ether was white. Didn't any one follow the Michelson/Morley experiment????
please somebody, mod up - thats funny
I think the point is that before the mass-mass marketing of wifi, the average user of wifi was a much more computer-security literate person.
How many people would appreciate a society where this type of act (any social engineering for large value crimes) was impossible? I was wondering if that would mean fingerprint readers and badges for everyone, everywhere, all the time. Wondering also if a nearly perfect solution would be to never trust anyone without (and reading it first) paperwork. Comments?
Doesn't anyone else (if anyone is still reading this thread) find the fact that the new reserved words, are context sensitive? That yield may still be used as an identifier in non-sensitive places. Just me, but I thought that language class I took years ago would have said thats a 'bad thing' for readability.
Check it out: If you could get everybody to enact it, what a great idea. Implementation, just a minor problem
Bill, go back back to work and stop playing with the Internet.