Sorry, I did take a brief look at it, didn't see that part and did let myself be goaded by our glorious leaders.
I don't know if "dumbass" is neccessary though. I was refering to the fact that the W3C seems to have a preference for PNG so perhaps we should stick to their standards.
Speaking as a Brit, to get insurance anyway you have to give information on any history of heart disease/diabetes in your family anyway. This is only slightly different.
You would have thought though that they'll soon find out that no-ones immortal and we're all genetically programmed to die of something at some point, making it a bit of a moot point.
Totally disagree, why should I be held responsible for the acts of my ancestors? As long as I live my life with respect for others, it doesn't make a blind bit of difference if I feel guilty for historical acts or not.
Fully agree with what you're saying there, UK's got a parlimentary monachary, US is a republic. Neither of these are truly democratic, but who's to say which is more corrupt.
It's not that they've got something to hide. They've come out top in an industry accepted benchmarking suite, and Oracle are saying that this is the only application where SQL Server can outperform Oracle. If the TPC benchmarks really are that unrealistic, why does anyone (MS, Oracle, IBM, whoever) care about them?
Brilliant argument. I was thinking more within the last 50 years.
And going on the Marshall plan, it was mostly American companies (the grandpappy of one G.W Bush) financing the Nazis, so I suppose that it's only morally right that you try and clean up the mess.
Out of your examples Italy is the only country that has a coalition government that changes all of the time. And the world doesn't look to the US for stability. Please give one example of US imperialism which has actually stabalised anywhere in the world.
And where is the connection between the size of country and optimum number of political parties?
I'm not flaming, or whatever, I'm just interested in hearing some justification for all of that.
I'm sure that it is just familiarity, whilst, admittedly the directory specs (SET DEF $1$DUA4:[x.y.x]) can be a bit confusing, conversley stuff like SHOW SYSTEM == ps seems a lot less confusing than Unix to me.
I know it's practically heresy round here, but I've always viewed UNIX commands as being cryptic for the sake of it.
national SOCIALISM, you twat.
And I haven't seen many of you gun-toting Americans doing much about your current election.
Why don't you (the majority of Americans that voted for Al Gore) turn over your corrupt government and put in the man with the mandate?
What more are you waiting for?
Oh, and I was about to send you one as well. I'd better not now as you've obviously lost your sense of humour.
KTB:Lover, Poet, Artiste, Aesthete, Programmer.
There is no contradiction
You obviously really think that there is, otherwise you wouldn't have to keep re-inforcing the idea to yourself.
Real men can program FORTRAN in any other language....
One more reason not to eat at McDonalds. That is truely discusting....
Step 1 - Find a bush
Step 2 - Realise that you're hundreds of miles away from anyone
Step 3 - Sod the bush, just go where you are.
Australias a big place.
Why do you fear the moderation? Liberate yourself, speak freely !!!
No-one can prove that life has value, it's a consensus that we've agreed on over our evolution.
There can be no hard evidence either way as to whether life has value, it's a philosophical point.
The origins of mankind and the universe and the order in which different animals appeared, surely must be scientific questions.
For my science I like to have facts to back up the theories.
Why is better to believe in something based upon no facts, than only believe things which can be proved?
Now I'm confused, wasn't StongARM from the company ARM (formerly Acorn) and licensed to Intel. DEC had Alpha didn't they?
Sorry, I did take a brief look at it, didn't see that part and did let myself be goaded by our glorious leaders.
I don't know if "dumbass" is neccessary though. I was refering to the fact that the W3C seems to have a preference for PNG so perhaps we should stick to their standards.
Come on people, let's stick to open standards here...
Speaking as a Brit, to get insurance anyway you have to give information on any history of heart disease/diabetes in your family anyway. This is only slightly different.
You would have thought though that they'll soon find out that no-ones immortal and we're all genetically programmed to die of something at some point, making it a bit of a moot point.
Totally disagree, why should I be held responsible for the acts of my ancestors? As long as I live my life with respect for others, it doesn't make a blind bit of difference if I feel guilty for historical acts or not.
Fully agree with what you're saying there, UK's got a parlimentary monachary, US is a republic. Neither of these are truly democratic, but who's to say which is more corrupt.
It says in the article that it's going to be Verisign and not Microsoft doing the certification.
This is being done by the European Space Agency, nothing at all to do with NASA.
I/O and availability.
Be aware.
This is the point though, for many people when the free-beer comes out, they forget about the free-speech.
...and your point is?
It's not that they've got something to hide. They've come out top in an industry accepted benchmarking suite, and Oracle are saying that this is the only application where SQL Server can outperform Oracle. If the TPC benchmarks really are that unrealistic, why does anyone (MS, Oracle, IBM, whoever) care about them?
Brilliant argument. I was thinking more within the last 50 years.
And going on the Marshall plan, it was mostly American companies (the grandpappy of one G.W Bush) financing the Nazis, so I suppose that it's only morally right that you try and clean up the mess.
Bush-Nazi connection
Out of your examples Italy is the only country that has a coalition government that changes all of the time. And the world doesn't look to the US for stability. Please give one example of US imperialism which has actually stabalised anywhere in the world.
And where is the connection between the size of country and optimum number of political parties?
I'm not flaming, or whatever, I'm just interested in hearing some justification for all of that.
I'm sure that it is just familiarity, whilst, admittedly the directory specs (SET DEF $1$DUA4:[x.y.x]) can be a bit confusing, conversley stuff like SHOW SYSTEM == ps seems a lot less confusing than Unix to me.
I know it's practically heresy round here, but I've always viewed UNIX commands as being cryptic for the sake of it.