i heard you often lick people's assholes for nickels. i have a few questions regarding this practice.
1) does the same price apply if i am getting you to lick someone else's asshole for a birthday gift?
2) is the price still the same if this present is to be performed in public without the recipient's knowledge?
3) can the recipient be my pet german sheppard?
fuck yes. it is very good to hear that your faggot friend doesn't sympathize with them there canadian faggot fuckers. your faggot friend likely understood that all canadians are faggot fuckers, and your friend being a faggot was likely concerned about the serious ass fucking that a canadian faggot fucker would give him.
those faggot fuckers have gone too far. i hear those canadian faggot fuckers are smart too. from what i understand it takes 5 american faggots combined to have the same iq as one canadian. we must unite to fight the power that is the canadian faggots.
your friend took a step in the right direction by not letting that canadian faggot fucker fuck him in the ass.
usually you would be correct in that assumption, as 95% of mac users are far too into shoving gerbils deep into their anus to track down a laptop.
but then again, what the fuck would you want to steal a mac for. all those are good for is using to signify that you like gerbils in your anus. seems a little useless to me.
(a) Nobody pretended this was the main objective, but a very nice benefit.
Oh, but that will happen. It will be touted as your greatest victory in the conflict, if only because it's the only one you've had. All a reasonable person actually has to do is listen to the words being spoken, and keep in mind that the people speaking want you to believe that they won.
(b) Nobody is saying that women are now at equal freedom level as in the US...
Neither was I. I'm not sure why you think this was the argument. All I was contending was that some of the tribes in the Northern Alliance who are in power right now have a history of human rights abuses that rivals that of the Taliban.
The other aspect is that Karzai was never a member of the Norther Alliance!
Hm... From RAWA's website... 'The armed groups of Dustom, Gulboddin, Ahmed Shah Masoud, Rabbani, Sayyaf and Khalili of the Hizbe Wahdat [Unity Party] are the main criminals. Today the majority of these murderers have joined together under the banner of the "Northern Alliance".' Nope. Don't see any mention of the Karzai in there.
C'mon, why don't you just admit that you don't want to say some good has come out of the whole mess. Be honest.
I'm not sure why it is you need me to admit anything. Nothing I do or do not say can change the fact that more Afghanistan civilians have died at the hands of the U.S. military than have American civilians at the hands of Al Quaida. Nothing I do or do not say will erase the history of travesties committed by your current allies in the region.
You see, on an empirical level, I don't consider any of that a victory. At best, the U.S. has outscored Bin Laden. Congratulations.
Also, since the war hasn't ended yet and you know what the ending is could you provide me with some stock tips?
What a terribly unproductive conversation this has become. If you need to believe in the lies you hear if they make you feel better, then I'll leave you to it, my anonymous little friend.
Oh, I'm not mad the Taliban are gone. I just don't buy into the idea that (a) this is partially what the whole war was about, and (b) that the women (and people in general) in the region have been liberated from the clutches of tyranny.
My point is, if you can't do anything about it, at least make an effort to know what's really going on.
...and bombings of military equipment which was purposely placed among civilian populations...
Nice.
Ah. So you bought into that version of events too, didja? You must have been bawling when you heard about that whole baby incubator story during the Gulf War.
Oh well.
You are so fucking pathetic.
Heh. Also irrelevent.
What would you have us do ?
If I would have you do anything, I'd have you bomb the right people, and not bomb anybody else until you found the right people. Your current actions did not achieve your objective, and killed more innocent people than were killed at the WTC&P. In the end, your military actions will have condemned your leader to be as hated in the Middle Eastern world as Bin Laden is in the Western world, and since it's this sort of thing that feeds anti-American sentiment and increases the popularity of attacks against the U.S.... well, you get the idea.
And before you begin telling me about how you can't appease the terrorists, there was a middle ground you could have tried. It involved going slowly, methodically, keeping the Middle East unsure about what your actions were going to be, solidifying alliances with military allies in the region, and striking only when a worthy target presented itself. You had some carte blanche with the rest of the world because of Sept 11th, but it wasn't going to be infinite, and you've just about used it all up.
You're asking me to prove that the current option is not the best one, an impossible task considering that the U.S. has already committed to the current one.
Whatever. We'll see how things go. I'll be thrilled if I turn out to be wrong.
Well, what bothers me is that any legitimacy he has he's built on the Hellmouth series. Except now, when faced with the international equivalent of it, his need to champion the underdog suddenly goes on hiatus. It's quite disappointing.
Tell that to the Afgan women who were being subjected to grossly unjust treatment at the hands of the Taliban.
It may interest you to know that some of the bands in the Northern Alliance have the same history of human rights violations that the Taliban have been accused of.
It's quite clear that the situation in Afganistan was a severe danger to US security
Incorrect. Bin Laden was a threat to national security, and he was in Afghanistan. Now that you've bombed the crap out of Afghanistan and Bin Laden is nowhere to be found, can you seriously tell me that the action you took has increased your prospects for safety at home?
Unless you can present a convincing argument that there was an effective alternative method for dealing with the problem that would lead to better results than the current state of affairs, the US response in fact is clearly moral and justified.
In other words, "please prove a negative". A typical argument these days.
Regardless of whatever phonily inflated statistics of civilian deaths you can fake up.
Lol. Ultimately this attitude will be your undoing. As regretful as Sept 11th was, it wasn't really a surprise to many of us. Turning a blind eye to or mocking facts presented to you of U.S. abuse of power internationally is one thing, but I hope you then don't turn around and ask in the face of acts like Sept 11th ask stupid questions like "Why has this happened?"
There's actually been a surprising influx of news stories about fuel cells lately. I don't think it'll be long before Bush is championing this as a new source of energy that will keep Americans autonomous, or something like that.
In some ways, our involvement in Afghanistan has a clear moral justification and purpose...
Ah yes. Kill more civilians than were killed on Sept 11th, and replace one band of thugs with another (only these ones are on our side (in much the same way that bin laden himself was on our side...)). Also, don't cry too hard when you can't actually get your man, so that the massive increase in political power at home and internationally can stick around for a while longer.
Slashdot Mirror
i heard you often lick people's assholes for nickels. i have a few questions regarding this practice.
1) does the same price apply if i am getting you to lick someone else's asshole for a birthday gift?
2) is the price still the same if this present is to be performed in public without the recipient's knowledge?
3) can the recipient be my pet german sheppard?
i await your reply.
fuck yes. it is very good to hear that your faggot friend doesn't sympathize with them there canadian faggot fuckers. your faggot friend likely understood that all canadians are faggot fuckers, and your friend being a faggot was likely concerned about the serious ass fucking that a canadian faggot fucker would give him.
those faggot fuckers have gone too far. i hear those canadian faggot fuckers are smart too. from what i understand it takes 5 american faggots combined to have the same iq as one canadian. we must unite to fight the power that is the canadian faggots.
your friend took a step in the right direction by not letting that canadian faggot fucker fuck him in the ass.
go fuck your grandmother you cat fucking cock rider.
go fuck your grandmother you cat fucking cock sucker.
go fuck your grandmother you cat fucking cock blower.
go fuck your grandmother you monkey fucking cock rider.
go fuck your grandmother you monkey fucking cock sucker.
go fuck your grandmother you monkey fucking cock blower.
go fuck your king you silly queen
go fuck your grandmother you cat fucking cock rider.
go fuck your grandmother you cat fucking cock sucker.
go fuck your grandmother you cat fucking cock blower.
go fuck your grandmother you monkey fucking cock rider.
go fuck your grandmother you monkey fucking cock sucker.
go fuck your grandmother you monkey fucking cock blower.
indeed. tool fans are notoriously into assfucking their grandmothers. fucking pitiful.
you would have likely just taken it in the ass, considering your fondness of recieving rim jobs from 6 year old boys.
usually you would be correct in that assumption, as 95% of mac users are far too into shoving gerbils deep into their anus to track down a laptop.
but then again, what the fuck would you want to steal a mac for. all those are good for is using to signify that you like gerbils in your anus. seems a little useless to me.
go fuck your grandmother you cat fucking cock rider.
go fuck your grandmother you cat fucking cock sucker.
go fuck your grandmother you cat fucking cock blower.
go fuck your grandmother you monkey fucking cock rider.
go fuck your grandmother you monkey fucking cock sucker.
go fuck your grandmother you monkey fucking cock blower.
Ooooooh. Good one.
Of course, if you gave me billions of dollars in venture capital I could probably find a way to give you back $5 million too.
(a) Nobody pretended this was the main objective, but a very nice benefit.
Oh, but that will happen. It will be touted as your greatest victory in the conflict, if only because it's the only one you've had. All a reasonable person actually has to do is listen to the words being spoken, and keep in mind that the people speaking want you to believe that they won.
(b) Nobody is saying that women are now at equal freedom level as in the US...
Neither was I. I'm not sure why you think this was the argument. All I was contending was that some of the tribes in the Northern Alliance who are in power right now have a history of human rights abuses that rivals that of the Taliban.
The other aspect is that Karzai was never a member of the Norther Alliance!
Hm... From RAWA's website... 'The armed groups of Dustom, Gulboddin, Ahmed Shah Masoud, Rabbani, Sayyaf and Khalili of the Hizbe Wahdat [Unity Party] are the main criminals. Today the majority of these murderers have joined together under the banner of the "Northern Alliance".' Nope. Don't see any mention of the Karzai in there.
C'mon, why don't you just admit that you don't want to say some good has come out of the whole mess. Be honest.
I'm not sure why it is you need me to admit anything. Nothing I do or do not say can change the fact that more Afghanistan civilians have died at the hands of the U.S. military than have American civilians at the hands of Al Quaida. Nothing I do or do not say will erase the history of travesties committed by your current allies in the region.
You see, on an empirical level, I don't consider any of that a victory. At best, the U.S. has outscored Bin Laden. Congratulations.
...any motherboards that can handle dual Durons? Also, assuming they exist, does Linux play nice with it?
Do you know where the right people are?
Snort. Like it matters at this point.
Also, since the war hasn't ended yet and you know what the ending is could you provide me with some stock tips?
What a terribly unproductive conversation this has become. If you need to believe in the lies you hear if they make you feel better, then I'll leave you to it, my anonymous little friend.
Oh, I'm not mad the Taliban are gone. I just don't buy into the idea that (a) this is partially what the whole war was about, and (b) that the women (and people in general) in the region have been liberated from the clutches of tyranny.
My point is, if you can't do anything about it, at least make an effort to know what's really going on.
...and bombings of military equipment which was purposely placed among civilian populations ...
... well, you get the idea.
Nice.
Ah. So you bought into that version of events too, didja? You must have been bawling when you heard about that whole baby incubator story during the Gulf War.
Oh well.
You are so fucking pathetic.
Heh. Also irrelevent.
What would you have us do ?
If I would have you do anything, I'd have you bomb the right people, and not bomb anybody else until you found the right people. Your current actions did not achieve your objective, and killed more innocent people than were killed at the WTC&P. In the end, your military actions will have condemned your leader to be as hated in the Middle Eastern world as Bin Laden is in the Western world, and since it's this sort of thing that feeds anti-American sentiment and increases the popularity of attacks against the U.S.
And before you begin telling me about how you can't appease the terrorists, there was a middle ground you could have tried. It involved going slowly, methodically, keeping the Middle East unsure about what your actions were going to be, solidifying alliances with military allies in the region, and striking only when a worthy target presented itself. You had some carte blanche with the rest of the world because of Sept 11th, but it wasn't going to be infinite, and you've just about used it all up.
The US has never targeted civilians.
Irrelevent. I don't care who the U.S. is aiming for, they need to take responsibility for what they hit.
Alot more than 3700 civilians were killed in the WTC (think >5000).
Current estimates of WTC are under 3000. That combined with the number killed at the Pentagon and on the planes adds up to less than 3700.
Wrong. I am not asking you to prove a negative.
You're asking me to prove that the current option is not the best one, an impossible task considering that the U.S. has already committed to the current one.
Whatever. We'll see how things go. I'll be thrilled if I turn out to be wrong.
Please, get a clue.
Consider the clue already gotten.
And if you don't still believe me...Read the topmost story here.
Well, what bothers me is that any legitimacy he has he's built on the Hellmouth series. Except now, when faced with the international equivalent of it, his need to champion the underdog suddenly goes on hiatus. It's quite disappointing.
Tell that to the Afgan women who were being subjected to grossly unjust treatment at the hands of the Taliban.
It may interest you to know that some of the bands in the Northern Alliance have the same history of human rights violations that the Taliban have been accused of.
It's quite clear that the situation in Afganistan was a severe danger to US security
Incorrect. Bin Laden was a threat to national security, and he was in Afghanistan. Now that you've bombed the crap out of Afghanistan and Bin Laden is nowhere to be found, can you seriously tell me that the action you took has increased your prospects for safety at home?
Unless you can present a convincing argument that there was an effective alternative method for dealing with the problem that would lead to better results than the current state of affairs, the US response in fact is clearly moral and justified.
In other words, "please prove a negative". A typical argument these days.
Regardless of whatever phonily inflated statistics of civilian deaths you can fake up.
Lol. Ultimately this attitude will be your undoing. As regretful as Sept 11th was, it wasn't really a surprise to many of us. Turning a blind eye to or mocking facts presented to you of U.S. abuse of power internationally is one thing, but I hope you then don't turn around and ask in the face of acts like Sept 11th ask stupid questions like "Why has this happened?"
There's actually been a surprising influx of news stories about fuel cells lately. I don't think it'll be long before Bush is championing this as a new source of energy that will keep Americans autonomous, or something like that.
In some ways, our involvement in Afghanistan has a clear moral justification and purpose...
Ah yes. Kill more civilians than were killed on Sept 11th, and replace one band of thugs with another (only these ones are on our side (in much the same way that bin laden himself was on our side...)). Also, don't cry too hard when you can't actually get your man, so that the massive increase in political power at home and internationally can stick around for a while longer.
Very clear. Very moral. Very justified.
Jeez, Katz. I expected better of you.
Star Ballz: The plot, dialogue and characterization are no better than Episode 1, but at least the chicks get naked.
Fight monopoly with monopoly. Wonderful!
Why do I have a sudden urge to start downloading FreeBSD?