I know Slashdot loves to pull up these kinds of articles every time they're available. TED is susceptible similar lectures as well, so we who have actually worked in education have to keep our eyes open before the "computers will solve all our complex problems" crowd runs away with an invaluable source of social evolution.
Before the average Slashdotter writes off brick-and-mortar schools in favor of online learning with justifications like, "I was always bored in class", "I was smarter than my teacher", and "Just be open to change!" consider this: Is your average Slashdotter ANYTHING like your average American student?
The answer is that they simply are not. Slashdotters likely grew up in smaller than average social groups with access to technology. We adapt to new technology with little issue. We understand the underlying concepts of nested menus and function taxonomy. We are nerds and geeks who thrive on learning.
The rest of America's children do not thrive on learning and providing online education will not change that.
Having worked in middle schools, high schools, with community college transfer students, and then the resulting university undergrads, I have to say: If the general population doesn't HAVE to learn something or if there isn't something someone sufficiently passionate to help them learn something new regardless, they won't bother. Humanity is curious about the universe in that we consistently have some extremely smart people come to global acclaim for their works, but most people just want to live easy, have sex, and do so as long as possible.
It's the role of the educator to affect everyone, regardless of station or passion, and get them the minimum (plus) standard of knowledge and analytical capability so that they can learn more things and more complex concepts at the next level. This is something a computer with programed or limited responses cannot do.
Yes, OLPC can get kids excited about new things. Those children will NOT be starting hospitals in their villages with simple access to online education. They will not become cultural philosophers through online education. They will not begin building Motorola Zoom tablets with they learned via online learning. The concepts required to do any of those complex actions cannot be taught in a single plug-and-play manner. It requires a talented individual and as social an environment as possible to adjust the content to the user, to adjust the lesson plan to the person that day.
The only way teachers will ever go obsolete is if we are ignorant to assume that computers will ever substitute for the adaptive human mind.
Thank you, sir, for doing the research I did not. The Transformer Book looks to be the right step in the right direction with my only concerns being, weight, heat, battery life, and cost (due to the hardware included). Since it's not yet in consumer or reviewer hands, I'll keep those concerns until I hear otherwise.
But that 11.6" version is already calling my name...
No... Tablets do NOT need all-new applications. What tablets need is a non-phone/device OS environment based on existing, established OSes (Windows, Linux, etc.) that is low-resource-intensive (scratch Windows), but still has the expectation of *multiple* users and each user being a content producer.
I understand the corporate rush to get in on the smart-device bandwagon, but where the evolution of the USER is going is towards scalable portability.
Desktops led to laptops which led to ultra portables (high-cost) and netbooks (low-cost). The next step is the net-vertible (like the ASUS Transformer) that can be a highly portable tablet or a portable workstation like a laptop. What we need to continue the honing of this next step in the evolution of the PC is for a genuine personal computer OS to work on low-power tablets.
Yes, Windows 8 is hoping to be that option, but the weight and power requirements of that OS will be prohibitive for net-vertibles.
I agree that those are frequently the most important, but for those of us looking for netvertibles (Asus Transformer, etc.), other important specs/features include:
-USB Ports -SD card slots -Repairability/upgradability (understanding that the trend is to create self-contained devices for increased device purchasing) -Camera(s)
I'm turning 30 this year and graduated high school in Southern California in 2000.
I remember two distinctive attempts at computer education in my public education. First was in 4th and 5th grades when, at a new elementary school, the dedicated computer teacher who taught only computer classes brought us into the lab to teach us about the internals of a computer tower just as a biology teacher would teach us about the squishy bits inside of a frog. I remember the hardest thing to understand is that these new 3.5" floppy disks were not "floppy" like the 5.25" floppy disks, but should never be referred to as "hard disks". Those were completely different. Eventually, he would teach us the internals with moderate success.
Next, he taught us "Logo" or, as many of us called it, "turtle drawing". I had very limited success here and invested only as much effort as required so I could be allowed to play the Oregon Trail or "Freedom!" which was a game that put the player in the persona of a runaway slave in the antebellum South.
In high school, I elected to take a "computer" class, that was actually just a typing class. My hands were already too big for the iMac keyboards, so I learned to type without using my pinkies for anything but shift, alt, and ctrl keys. This was "wrong", however, and I would have to repeat my exercises if I was caught not using home row properly. Instead, I made it a goal to complete as many exercises as possible and then, when the teacher came around, to switch to the painful home row standard. I completed the "course" with a couple weeks to spare, so I found locked games that were installed on the iMacs, switched to a computer behind the teacher, and played those for the rest of the term.
The only other school-related computer education I had was the use of the "Computer Science" lab (PCs) after hours with actual computer science students playing Starcraft and Counter-Strike. I learned more with those guys playing those games than at any other time before graduating high school
As a someone who was in high school in the late 90s, who played first-person shooters, and who had long black hair while wearing dark clothes, I'll always feel a particular attachment to the Slashdot posts and discussions that followed the Columbine shootings.
I was held to multiple "counseling sessions" (read: interrogations) and was looked at with fear by those who didn't know me. Luckily, I was rather social, so the many that did know me laughed off the possibility of me going nuts with a gun.
It was genuinely comforting knowing that I wasn't the only one being profiled.
FTFA: "The electricity used by the Supercharger comes from a solar carport system provided by SolarCity, which results in almost zero marginal energy cost after installation."
Well of course it will cost almost nothing after installation. That's the point of capital costs. You buy the land, pour the concrete, throw in a couple amenities, plant a massive battery and transformer system, and hook them up to the solar cells. Note that such an investment is utterly massive and unsustainable. With SO FEW Tesla drivers on the road (in that area, no less), they're going to rarely have a "customer".
But that's not how a public Level 3 charger would work. No way. Public Level 3 chargers would also require trenching from a strong enough power source since they will actually have regular customers. Then they will have to include the cost of all capital expenses (station, hardware, etc.) in the cost of the electricity that will be used during peak electricity usage (10am - 4pm) in some of the hottest areas in the nation when everyone is running their air conditioners (massive increase in electricity cost). Throw in the amount of energy lost when charging quickly and you have a compounded cost of simply fueling your car. This is why we encourage people to charge their cars at home and in the middle of the night.
Pure Electric Vehicles are an evolutionary speed bump. They exist to force manufacturers to accept the newer sensibilities of consumers and to seek better ways to reclaim power (regenerative braking, etc.), decrease wind resistance, and make lighter (and still affordable and sustainable) machines altogether.
Expense. Taxis have live links because they're profit-generating. A trip in a taxi is charged per mile and at a major premium. Bus fare is deficit-minimizing and offers the opportunity to to travel very long distances for very little cost.
Subways and light rail, though, can be different. Some charge per boarding while others charge per the distance between boarding and exiting.
Also, consider what would happen if cellular service was unavailable. You'd have to create a charge-caching system and then do bulk transactions when reception is found.
Live transactions are a bit more complex than "$1.50 from the amount on this card."
The children who receive access to these donations did not choose to live in America over other places. Do not condemn them for something they couldn't control. Also, when a kid has to spend the greater portion of his/her childhood in a bed due to leukemia, I have no problem throwin' down a couple bucks to make sure he/she isn't just staring at walls and monitoring machines that go beep.
If you find it better to give your money to a major multinational organization with tons of overhead that may or not actually be able to put your donation to use, do it. But don't go hating on kids just because they have a severe illness in one country instead of another.
This is not insightful. It's ignorant of history, truth, and completely hyperbolic.
The truth is that the US judicial system has been *the* floodgate that opens to change from status quo rather consistently. Civil rights, women's rights, rights to contraception and inter-racial marriage. The three branches of our government all have their flaws, but the one that has consistently had less to do with bribes and pressure has always been the judicial.
Defeatism is surrender to the cause you hate. Apathy is just short of volunteering for that cause you hate.
1) I would not fault you for violent actions in the case of being requested to cook a steak "well-done".;)
2) If I genuinely knew that you would likely be violent if I asked for a well-done steak and then did so, you would not be held entirely liable for your violent actions on me and if you hurt others, I would be held at least partially liable.
Yes, while we all accept that the statement of words of any fashion should not immediately compel the rational person to violent action, we live in a world where they still do. Given the realities of the effects of words on people, we must still be judicious in their use.
Free speech is not a blank check to do as one wishes without consequence. It is as much as responsibility as it is a luxury.
But let's change the players a bit. If it wasn't a private citizen that made this video and was, instead, an arm of the American military forces and their goal was to goad Muslims into combat, would there be much protection of the video and its creators? What would be the difference?
My post had nothing to do with my feelings. It has to do with US judicial precedence.
And I don't care for what religion or reason one kills another, given the history of of humans killing humans, it's almost never been for a good enough reason.
Actually, you can be held liable for the content of your speech directed to inciting, and is likely to incite, imminent lawless action (Brandenburg v. Ohio) or if your speech includes "fighting words" (Chaplinsky v. New Hampshire).
In the Chaplinsky case, there was a guy that was arrested and fined for verbally abusing members of organized religion on a street corner. The Supreme Court found that his speech was strong enough to incite violence and upheld his citation.
From the decision: "There are certain well-defined and narrowly limited classes of speech, the prevention and punishment of which have never been thought to raise any constitutional problem. These include the lewd and obscene, the profane, the libelous, and the insulting or "fighting" words those which by their very utterance inflict injury or tend to incite an immediate breach of the peace."
It can be rather strongly argued that the producer of the video overstepped the bounds described in the case.
How far (time, distance) from work now? How far (time, distance) from new place?
Are you willing to move closer to your current job?
Do you have other people to whom you are obligated that have commitments near where you are now? (schools, other jobs, family)
My bias: Happiness at work (job satisfaction, challenge, belief in the work, being around good people) is more important than wage. I don't say this as someone who has already made a bunch of money. I'm 29 and making under 50k in an area with high cost of living. I also live only 3 miles from my office and bike commute. I would need an offer of at least a 40% increase in pay WITH all the job satisfaction, challenge, and belief in my work to *consider* changing my place of employment. I have no kids and have had the same partner for a decade.
Indeed. If there were days of "shock enforcement" where 100% of available traffic officers specifically sought out to enforce cell phone driving laws instead of other non-immediately-deadly traffic infractions, people would respond QUICKLY.
Why do people continue to talk on their cell phones when it's against the law? Because they think they can get away with it. How do you change that? Ticket SO MANY PEOPLE that they talk and whine and bitch about it... that way the risk is genuine.
Do this once a month for three months without announcing the plan to anyone an watch things change QUICKLY.
Social and Mobile gaming appeals to a very small overlap of EA's traditional core audience: invested gamers. Moreover, EA has its own mobile gaming arm.
EA is tanking because it has tried to cover ALL the bases (Xbox, Playstation, PC/Mac, iPhone, Android, Kindle, Facebook...) and has thus lost the ability to accurately and reliably cater to a single audience. EA has become so big that, like an octopus that has too many arms, can't manage to feed itself.
If they want to survive and be genuinely profitable, they need to Ma' Bell it up, divide their separate divisions up into actual self-sufficient companies and see who sinks and who swims. Focus on your audience, not the entirety of the Earth's population.
Ya. I work in transportation and LPR is a growing successful way to capture a massive amount of data while not doing much. You can send enforcement officers out to check for permits, or you can use permitless LPR systems with which people register their plates. If someone isn't on the list, ticket! If they are, keep on driving.
In the parking world, the list of read plates are expunged nightly or at LEAST weekly.
I don't think I ever, in any of my posts in regards to this article, suggested that anyone else should be limited by my preferences. There are plenty of people like me, but I never suggested that everyone was.
I never said YOU shouldn't have access to a smarphone or cellular internet access.
*I* just don't want my multifunction device to be a source of accidental charges ("To use this function, you will have to connect to internet..."), have the batter drained by functions that I find unnecessary, and to still have sub-par function for touted features (like media players).
Twice as many of any other president. But doubling a small number is not particularly notable.
Going from 1 to 3 is a 300% increase, but a difference of two. Obama went from 3 to 6, a 200% increase, but a differernce of three.
What should be focused on are the cases, not the statistics of very small numbers.
Moreover, the president is *accountable* for the actions of those below him. His validity as a president can be jeopardized for their actions (accountability), but since he doesn't directly control them, he cannot be responsible for all their actions.
I don't think racking up a total count of SIX is sufficient to refer to him as a "radical authoritarian". Also, was it OBAMA who initiated the proceedings or, say, the DOD and CIA?
But there's cost to the user. Modern feature phones are made to do whatever they can to get you to either buy a data plan you will not be able to use well enough or to get you to transfer data without a data plan and thus pay out the nose for 600KB of transfer.
I, too, would like a phone like the one you describe. It would be the only one I would give a child.;)
Slashdot Mirror
Very well said, friend.
I know Slashdot loves to pull up these kinds of articles every time they're available. TED is susceptible similar lectures as well, so we who have actually worked in education have to keep our eyes open before the "computers will solve all our complex problems" crowd runs away with an invaluable source of social evolution.
Before the average Slashdotter writes off brick-and-mortar schools in favor of online learning with justifications like, "I was always bored in class", "I was smarter than my teacher", and "Just be open to change!" consider this: Is your average Slashdotter ANYTHING like your average American student?
The answer is that they simply are not. Slashdotters likely grew up in smaller than average social groups with access to technology. We adapt to new technology with little issue. We understand the underlying concepts of nested menus and function taxonomy. We are nerds and geeks who thrive on learning.
The rest of America's children do not thrive on learning and providing online education will not change that.
Having worked in middle schools, high schools, with community college transfer students, and then the resulting university undergrads, I have to say: If the general population doesn't HAVE to learn something or if there isn't something someone sufficiently passionate to help them learn something new regardless, they won't bother. Humanity is curious about the universe in that we consistently have some extremely smart people come to global acclaim for their works, but most people just want to live easy, have sex, and do so as long as possible.
It's the role of the educator to affect everyone, regardless of station or passion, and get them the minimum (plus) standard of knowledge and analytical capability so that they can learn more things and more complex concepts at the next level. This is something a computer with programed or limited responses cannot do.
Yes, OLPC can get kids excited about new things. Those children will NOT be starting hospitals in their villages with simple access to online education. They will not become cultural philosophers through online education. They will not begin building Motorola Zoom tablets with they learned via online learning. The concepts required to do any of those complex actions cannot be taught in a single plug-and-play manner. It requires a talented individual and as social an environment as possible to adjust the content to the user, to adjust the lesson plan to the person that day.
The only way teachers will ever go obsolete is if we are ignorant to assume that computers will ever substitute for the adaptive human mind.
Thank you, sir, for doing the research I did not. The Transformer Book looks to be the right step in the right direction with my only concerns being, weight, heat, battery life, and cost (due to the hardware included). Since it's not yet in consumer or reviewer hands, I'll keep those concerns until I hear otherwise.
But that 11.6" version is already calling my name...
No... Tablets do NOT need all-new applications. What tablets need is a non-phone/device OS environment based on existing, established OSes (Windows, Linux, etc.) that is low-resource-intensive (scratch Windows), but still has the expectation of *multiple* users and each user being a content producer.
I understand the corporate rush to get in on the smart-device bandwagon, but where the evolution of the USER is going is towards scalable portability.
Desktops led to laptops which led to ultra portables (high-cost) and netbooks (low-cost). The next step is the net-vertible (like the ASUS Transformer) that can be a highly portable tablet or a portable workstation like a laptop. What we need to continue the honing of this next step in the evolution of the PC is for a genuine personal computer OS to work on low-power tablets.
Yes, Windows 8 is hoping to be that option, but the weight and power requirements of that OS will be prohibitive for net-vertibles.
I agree that those are frequently the most important, but for those of us looking for netvertibles (Asus Transformer, etc.), other important specs/features include:
-USB Ports
-SD card slots
-Repairability/upgradability (understanding that the trend is to create self-contained devices for increased device purchasing)
-Camera(s)
Wish-List
-- PC OS (not a phone OS)
I'm turning 30 this year and graduated high school in Southern California in 2000.
I remember two distinctive attempts at computer education in my public education. First was in 4th and 5th grades when, at a new elementary school, the dedicated computer teacher who taught only computer classes brought us into the lab to teach us about the internals of a computer tower just as a biology teacher would teach us about the squishy bits inside of a frog. I remember the hardest thing to understand is that these new 3.5" floppy disks were not "floppy" like the 5.25" floppy disks, but should never be referred to as "hard disks". Those were completely different. Eventually, he would teach us the internals with moderate success.
Next, he taught us "Logo" or, as many of us called it, "turtle drawing". I had very limited success here and invested only as much effort as required so I could be allowed to play the Oregon Trail or "Freedom!" which was a game that put the player in the persona of a runaway slave in the antebellum South.
In high school, I elected to take a "computer" class, that was actually just a typing class. My hands were already too big for the iMac keyboards, so I learned to type without using my pinkies for anything but shift, alt, and ctrl keys. This was "wrong", however, and I would have to repeat my exercises if I was caught not using home row properly. Instead, I made it a goal to complete as many exercises as possible and then, when the teacher came around, to switch to the painful home row standard. I completed the "course" with a couple weeks to spare, so I found locked games that were installed on the iMacs, switched to a computer behind the teacher, and played those for the rest of the term.
The only other school-related computer education I had was the use of the "Computer Science" lab (PCs) after hours with actual computer science students playing Starcraft and Counter-Strike. I learned more with those guys playing those games than at any other time before graduating high school
As a someone who was in high school in the late 90s, who played first-person shooters, and who had long black hair while wearing dark clothes, I'll always feel a particular attachment to the Slashdot posts and discussions that followed the Columbine shootings.
I was held to multiple "counseling sessions" (read: interrogations) and was looked at with fear by those who didn't know me. Luckily, I was rather social, so the many that did know me laughed off the possibility of me going nuts with a gun.
It was genuinely comforting knowing that I wasn't the only one being profiled.
I came here to suggest this very thing.
FTFA: "The electricity used by the Supercharger comes from a solar carport system provided by SolarCity, which results in almost zero marginal energy cost after installation."
Well of course it will cost almost nothing after installation. That's the point of capital costs. You buy the land, pour the concrete, throw in a couple amenities, plant a massive battery and transformer system, and hook them up to the solar cells. Note that such an investment is utterly massive and unsustainable. With SO FEW Tesla drivers on the road (in that area, no less), they're going to rarely have a "customer".
But that's not how a public Level 3 charger would work. No way. Public Level 3 chargers would also require trenching from a strong enough power source since they will actually have regular customers. Then they will have to include the cost of all capital expenses (station, hardware, etc.) in the cost of the electricity that will be used during peak electricity usage (10am - 4pm) in some of the hottest areas in the nation when everyone is running their air conditioners (massive increase in electricity cost). Throw in the amount of energy lost when charging quickly and you have a compounded cost of simply fueling your car. This is why we encourage people to charge their cars at home and in the middle of the night.
Pure Electric Vehicles are an evolutionary speed bump. They exist to force manufacturers to accept the newer sensibilities of consumers and to seek better ways to reclaim power (regenerative braking, etc.), decrease wind resistance, and make lighter (and still affordable and sustainable) machines altogether.
Expense. Taxis have live links because they're profit-generating. A trip in a taxi is charged per mile and at a major premium. Bus fare is deficit-minimizing and offers the opportunity to to travel very long distances for very little cost.
Subways and light rail, though, can be different. Some charge per boarding while others charge per the distance between boarding and exiting.
Also, consider what would happen if cellular service was unavailable. You'd have to create a charge-caching system and then do bulk transactions when reception is found.
Live transactions are a bit more complex than "$1.50 from the amount on this card."
The children who receive access to these donations did not choose to live in America over other places. Do not condemn them for something they couldn't control. Also, when a kid has to spend the greater portion of his/her childhood in a bed due to leukemia, I have no problem throwin' down a couple bucks to make sure he/she isn't just staring at walls and monitoring machines that go beep.
If you find it better to give your money to a major multinational organization with tons of overhead that may or not actually be able to put your donation to use, do it. But don't go hating on kids just because they have a severe illness in one country instead of another.
I'm a Childs Play fan myself. I choose the gift. I choose the children's hospital. Penny Arcade runs it, but they take ZERO overhead.
It's easy, trustworthy, and reflective of me.
This is not insightful. It's ignorant of history, truth, and completely hyperbolic.
The truth is that the US judicial system has been *the* floodgate that opens to change from status quo rather consistently. Civil rights, women's rights, rights to contraception and inter-racial marriage. The three branches of our government all have their flaws, but the one that has consistently had less to do with bribes and pressure has always been the judicial.
Defeatism is surrender to the cause you hate. Apathy is just short of volunteering for that cause you hate.
1) I would not fault you for violent actions in the case of being requested to cook a steak "well-done". ;)
2) If I genuinely knew that you would likely be violent if I asked for a well-done steak and then did so, you would not be held entirely liable for your violent actions on me and if you hurt others, I would be held at least partially liable.
Yes, while we all accept that the statement of words of any fashion should not immediately compel the rational person to violent action, we live in a world where they still do. Given the realities of the effects of words on people, we must still be judicious in their use.
Free speech is not a blank check to do as one wishes without consequence. It is as much as responsibility as it is a luxury.
But let's change the players a bit. If it wasn't a private citizen that made this video and was, instead, an arm of the American military forces and their goal was to goad Muslims into combat, would there be much protection of the video and its creators? What would be the difference?
My post had nothing to do with my feelings. It has to do with US judicial precedence.
And I don't care for what religion or reason one kills another, given the history of of humans killing humans, it's almost never been for a good enough reason.
Actually, you can be held liable for the content of your speech directed to inciting, and is likely to incite, imminent lawless action (Brandenburg v. Ohio) or if your speech includes "fighting words" (Chaplinsky v. New Hampshire).
In the Chaplinsky case, there was a guy that was arrested and fined for verbally abusing members of organized religion on a street corner. The Supreme Court found that his speech was strong enough to incite violence and upheld his citation.
From the decision:
"There are certain well-defined and narrowly limited classes of speech, the prevention and punishment of which have never been thought to raise any constitutional problem. These include the lewd and obscene, the profane, the libelous, and the insulting or "fighting" words those which by their very utterance inflict injury or tend to incite an immediate breach of the peace."
It can be rather strongly argued that the producer of the video overstepped the bounds described in the case.
How far (time, distance) from work now?
How far (time, distance) from new place?
Are you willing to move closer to your current job?
Do you have other people to whom you are obligated that have commitments near where you are now? (schools, other jobs, family)
My bias: Happiness at work (job satisfaction, challenge, belief in the work, being around good people) is more important than wage. I don't say this as someone who has already made a bunch of money. I'm 29 and making under 50k in an area with high cost of living. I also live only 3 miles from my office and bike commute. I would need an offer of at least a 40% increase in pay WITH all the job satisfaction, challenge, and belief in my work to *consider* changing my place of employment. I have no kids and have had the same partner for a decade.
Indeed. If there were days of "shock enforcement" where 100% of available traffic officers specifically sought out to enforce cell phone driving laws instead of other non-immediately-deadly traffic infractions, people would respond QUICKLY.
Why do people continue to talk on their cell phones when it's against the law? Because they think they can get away with it. How do you change that? Ticket SO MANY PEOPLE that they talk and whine and bitch about it... that way the risk is genuine.
Do this once a month for three months without announcing the plan to anyone an watch things change QUICKLY.
PS -- Use unmarked cars and cameras, too.
Social and Mobile gaming appeals to a very small overlap of EA's traditional core audience: invested gamers. Moreover, EA has its own mobile gaming arm.
EA is tanking because it has tried to cover ALL the bases (Xbox, Playstation, PC/Mac, iPhone, Android, Kindle, Facebook...) and has thus lost the ability to accurately and reliably cater to a single audience. EA has become so big that, like an octopus that has too many arms, can't manage to feed itself.
If they want to survive and be genuinely profitable, they need to Ma' Bell it up, divide their separate divisions up into actual self-sufficient companies and see who sinks and who swims. Focus on your audience, not the entirety of the Earth's population.
Ya. I work in transportation and LPR is a growing successful way to capture a massive amount of data while not doing much. You can send enforcement officers out to check for permits, or you can use permitless LPR systems with which people register their plates. If someone isn't on the list, ticket! If they are, keep on driving.
In the parking world, the list of read plates are expunged nightly or at LEAST weekly.
I'm too big for a pony. But, hey, I'm pretty sure I could resell it for more than the phone... so sure!
I don't think I ever, in any of my posts in regards to this article, suggested that anyone else should be limited by my preferences. There are plenty of people like me, but I never suggested that everyone was.
I never said YOU shouldn't have access to a smarphone or cellular internet access.
*I* just don't want my multifunction device to be a source of accidental charges ("To use this function, you will have to connect to internet..."), have the batter drained by functions that I find unnecessary, and to still have sub-par function for touted features (like media players).
Twice as many of any other president. But doubling a small number is not particularly notable.
Going from 1 to 3 is a 300% increase, but a difference of two.
Obama went from 3 to 6, a 200% increase, but a differernce of three.
What should be focused on are the cases, not the statistics of very small numbers.
Moreover, the president is *accountable* for the actions of those below him. His validity as a president can be jeopardized for their actions (accountability), but since he doesn't directly control them, he cannot be responsible for all their actions.
I don't think racking up a total count of SIX is sufficient to refer to him as a "radical authoritarian". Also, was it OBAMA who initiated the proceedings or, say, the DOD and CIA?
But there's cost to the user. Modern feature phones are made to do whatever they can to get you to either buy a data plan you will not be able to use well enough or to get you to transfer data without a data plan and thus pay out the nose for 600KB of transfer.
I, too, would like a phone like the one you describe. It would be the only one I would give a child. ;)