Adding these kind of "features" to linux that hardly anyone needs or will use is great isn't it! Oh wait, this is what MS has been doing for years and linux zealots bitch about all the time. Quit wasting code on crap. Thank you.
Should be programmed to save itself to disk if this is a big issue. It's not really an OS's problem. Write in an escape mode where it will save the latest calculations or dump memory or some such. And yes, i did get first post, thank you.
haha good old wo1verin3(note the use of 1337 symbols). He's a barrel of laughs. Automatic mod his posts up to Funny haha!
I bet he'd have gotten to +3 if he'd just worked "M$" or "MCSE" in there somewhere. For instance, next time you can try.
"...if these resumes qualify as spam it wouldn't be hard to prosecute. We have the name and phone number of the person responsible. I bet he's an MCSE!"
The mod system here is similar to security through obscurity. If they can mod the bad bad anti-linux posts down and mod up the pro-linux/anti-ms posts, maybe noone will see them.
It would be nice if Linux, in addition to wanting to be the world's most popular/used OS, also happened to be *secure*. I look forward to that day, but until then... Well, let's just leave it at I won't be holding my breath.
Actually, you are a linux zealot. I see a large number of posts here on slashdot that give inaccurate and incorrect statements about anything that may be a hurdle to linux(including of course, microsoft) and they get modded up.
The slashdot mod system is run by irrational linux zealots. It's as obvious as daylight.
I looked at exchange IMAP + LDAP. It's a possible solution, but i have users that utilize the calendar and contacts as well.
I appreciate the suggestion on the window manager I will try that out, as preety gui's aren't required for a business.
The activex is a poor design decision...on the part of the company that makes it. AIX backend but an IIS fronted that only uses activex..thank you bastards! The problem is that in my industry, this software package is the microsoft of the industry. Plus i inherited it. Que sera.
i agree with you, but i'd wrote a post earlier with the problems i have with linux on the desktop. One of them included the fact that KDE and GNOME are sluggish and do not run on 64 megs of ram well at all. However, the bulk of my issues with linux desktop are application related. So therefore, the applications are more of an issue(to my business at least) than the gui.
Actually, I take back the sluggish I thought Gnome performed decently with 128 megs of ram. But 98 runs great on 64 megs of ram, and ive still got a lot of those puppies.
a linux firewall. You hate your company don't you? that's just asking for it. I rolled out linux+samba to some ancient netware boxes(sniff, coming from the early 90's CNE days, i'm gonna miss these puppies). Of course, these linux+samba boxes are integrated into an NT domain. I bet that just burns up the linux zealots. teehee
Slashdot Mirror
it's against the slashdot code to reply to your own post?
I agree with this post
I agree with this post
Adding these kind of "features" to linux that hardly anyone needs or will use is great isn't it! Oh wait, this is what MS has been doing for years and linux zealots bitch about all the time. Quit wasting code on crap. Thank you.
please do not piggyback my wonderful first post with your trash.
i do not agree with your post, since you didn't have a chance. Thank you.
Should be programmed to save itself to disk if this is a big issue. It's not really an OS's problem. Write in an escape mode where it will save the latest calculations or dump memory or some such. And yes, i did get first post, thank you.
I'm going to fuck you until you love me.
Thanks AC, have a link?
haha good old wo1verin3(note the use of 1337 symbols). He's a barrel of laughs. Automatic mod his posts up to Funny haha!
I bet he'd have gotten to +3 if he'd just worked "M$" or "MCSE" in there somewhere. For instance, next time you can try.
"...if these resumes qualify as spam it wouldn't be hard to prosecute. We have the name and phone number of the person responsible. I bet he's an MCSE!"
HAHA the laughs never end
1. Free Viagra
2. Hi, I took naked pics
3. Programmer For Hire
4. University Diplomas Cheap
5. 18 year old linux geek seeking Job
I think I'll delete #5 first.
Now mod me Funny please.
don't forget to add "you didn't hire me because you are obviously biased against [blacks|gays|martians|corpses|add your own]
I agree with this post.
I agree with this post.
The mod system here is similar to security through obscurity. If they can mod the bad bad anti-linux posts down and mod up the pro-linux/anti-ms posts, maybe noone will see them.
pleas stop molesting little children.
much like most of the linux geeks here, he was also a homosexual.
It would be nice if Linux, in addition to wanting to be the world's most popular/used OS, also happened to be *secure*. I look forward to that day, but until then... Well, let's just leave it at I won't be holding my breath.
How can you be a true troll with a 0 score
I agree with this post.
Actually, you are a linux zealot. I see a large number of posts here on slashdot that give inaccurate and incorrect statements about anything that may be a hurdle to linux(including of course, microsoft) and they get modded up.
The slashdot mod system is run by irrational linux zealots. It's as obvious as daylight.
I looked at exchange IMAP + LDAP. It's a possible solution, but i have users that utilize the calendar and contacts as well.
I appreciate the suggestion on the window manager I will try that out, as preety gui's aren't required for a business.
The activex is a poor design decision...on the part of the company that makes it. AIX backend but an IIS fronted that only uses activex..thank you bastards! The problem is that in my industry, this software package is the microsoft of the industry. Plus i inherited it. Que sera.
half functional workarounds are not a solution.
I agree with this post.
i agree with you, but i'd wrote a post earlier with the problems i have with linux on the desktop. One of them included the fact that KDE and GNOME are sluggish and do not run on 64 megs of ram well at all. However, the bulk of my issues with linux desktop are application related. So therefore, the applications are more of an issue(to my business at least) than the gui.
Actually, I take back the sluggish I thought Gnome performed decently with 128 megs of ram. But 98 runs great on 64 megs of ram, and ive still got a lot of those puppies.
a linux firewall. You hate your company don't you? that's just asking for it. I rolled out linux+samba to some ancient netware boxes(sniff, coming from the early 90's CNE days, i'm gonna miss these puppies). Of course, these linux+samba boxes are integrated into an NT domain. I bet that just burns up the linux zealots. teehee