It's funny, but if the terrorists were attempting to shread American values and traditions, thus making it an unliveable country and reducing it's power on a world stage, then they have succeeded...
This is Not funny
Loved the movie..so when will they write the book?
on
LOTR: The Two Towers
·
· Score: 1
Loved the movie... so when will they write the book?
2) Open Source is inherently less secure than closed source projects because you have more people analyzing the algorithms and processes in an open source project.
Not really. China has not been a communist country for a while now. You might ask why they still have the communist symbols on their flags and call themselves a People's Republic. Good question. But they definately are not communist.
You are asking reporters of different countries to score their own countries. This means, every country that is scored is scored by different people with different cultures and expectations.
A person in the U.S. may have a higher expectation of freedom, therefore giving the U.S. a lower score because they expect more.
Of course, the opposite could be true, in that the culture plays into the person giving a higher score.
I personally, think it is the first, and while I think this is an important study to do, it needs to be much more objective than having people of different countries score their own country.
Luckily it appears you know the most desired language in the world--English. You can visit most any country in the world and survive on teaching English in schools or privately.
Be very carefull of these organizations sending you on free or reduced fare trips to foreign countries to teach English. You lose out on a great deal of flexability and money. They will control your schedule and take most of the money--providing you with only a "free" trip.
My advice is to pick a country, pack a backpack, buy an airplane ticket, buy a lonely planet guidebook, and just go. Once you are there and find a hostel to stay in, you will meet people that can help you with finding a job. You might also realize once you are there, and in the budget places that the little money you had saved up will actually survive quite a while.
Just go. Things will work themselves out once you are there. The hardest thing is picking a country or continent. I'm leaving for Southeast Asia next week if you need a place to start out!
I don't think waiting around to buy something (if you need it) is ever the best way. Otherwise you will always be waiting... If you need a system the question should be what (i.e. best bang for the buck, or best performance).
If you are buying servers, and rack space is expensive, of course you buy the best. But most workstations and home computers should probably be bought on the knee of the curve.
That is, you make a very simple graph of speeds and prices. There is historicaly a point on the graph where it changes from being relatively flat to relatively verticle. Buy the system in that spot.
From the tone of the article, it sounds as if the writer is more concerned with the money already invested. I understand it is really frustrating to spend a lot of time on a project that doesn't pan out, but upgrading the software on the space shuttle is a serious endevour.
First of all, finding hardware, or having replacement parts made is not a big deal. Schematics exist for all the chips they use, and even low volume reproduction of the chips won't cost more than this new software they are developing.
Secondly, the space shuttle works, it has worked for years. There are major flaws in the entire design of the space shuttle. IMHO the entire space shuttle needs to be redesigned. No software redesign will fix the major flaws of the shuttle.
Lastly, if true OO approaches were used in the development of the software, then most of it should be able to be used for the next generation of shuttle vehicles.
So stop focusing on the narrow application of this software on an outdated Space Shuttle, and look to the future of spacecraft.
It looks to me like ignoring repeated attempts from ICANN to fix a problem is not the best business strategy.
What is amazing is not that they have incorrect data, but that after 15 months and repeated letters from ICANN about a single domain, that they still haven't done anything.
I guess if this is how they do business, its no wonder that they are rated so poorly in customer service.
Re:Inexpensive airborne link is desparately needed
on
Warflying: San Diego
·
· Score: 2, Informative
Use your cell phone. If you read the FARS, part 91, you can use a cellphone. If you look at 91.21 it says:
Sec. 91.21
Portable electronic devices.
(a) Except as provided in paragraph (b) of this section, no person may operate, nor may any operator or pilot in command of an aircraft allow the operation of, any portable electronic device on any of the following U.S.-registered civil aircraft: (1) Aircraft operated by a holder of an air carrier operating certificate or an operating certificate; or (2) Any other aircraft while it is operated under IFR. (b) Paragraph (a) of this section does not apply to-- (1) Portable voice recorders; (2) Hearing aids; (3) Heart pacemakers; (4) Electric shavers; or (5) Any other portable electronic device that the operator of the aircraft has determined will not cause interference with the navigation or communication system of the aircraft on which it is to be used. (c) In the case of an aircraft operated by a holder of an air carrier operating certificate or an operating certificate, the determination required by paragraph (b)(5) of this section shall be made by that operator of the aircraft on which the particular device is to be used. In the case of other aircraft, the determination may be made by the pilot in command or other operator of the aircraft.
So, if you aren't flying IFR, its automatically allowed. If you are flying IFR, then see 91.21(b)(5) which says that the operator may make a determination of whether or not intereference will exist... And 91.21(c) says that the opeartor in your case is the pilot in command.
The cell phone rule only applies to Commercial Aircraft. Unless as the pilot in command you want to dissallow yourself from using a cell phone. So... Use a cell phone it is the cheapest way.
The headline forgets to mention a couple of things.
1) The $80 CAD is equivelent of $50 USD. Thats what most people pay in the United States already.
2) They also offer a price break of $20 CAD to low users. Thats $12 USD. This is perfect for people like my parents who haven't switched, because all they do is e-mail and their dial-up while slow is worth the price.
A few problems:
1) The bill. I don't know about you, but I already have enough surprises with my cell phone bill every month. I don't want to get on a cheap plan for Internet and be surprised to find that I downloaded one too many mp3's.
2) Could this be the new beginning of Internet beige boxing? How are they going to stop me from spoofing my neigbors IP address!!!
Pepsi won't be focusing on Pepsi this year, they are spending a good deal of ad time on Lipton Brisk.
Has Pepsi hit its peak, or is Pepsi just desperate for something new?
Also, Pepsi will NOT be the first commercial of the Superbowl. Slot 1A was lost by Pepsi in 1999. Now it belongs to Budweiser. I'm sure Pepsi is hitting themselves for not advertising two years ago. Thats OK though, Budweiser seems to do better ads than Pepsi anyway.
Slashdot Mirror
This is Not funny
Loved the movie... so when will they write the book?
Yes, but I am not forced to chose a black interier even though I want a green one.
I say 2 weeks after the domain is available we will see the article about a porn site that came up in the domain.
2) Open Source is inherently less secure than closed source projects because you have more people analyzing the algorithms and processes in an open source project.
3) Open Source is a fad.
Does that clear things up for you?
Not really. China has not been a communist country for a while now. You might ask why they still have the communist symbols on their flags and call themselves a People's Republic. Good question. But they definately are not communist.
Please don't tell me when I am insulted.
A person in the U.S. may have a higher expectation of freedom, therefore giving the U.S. a lower score because they expect more.
Of course, the opposite could be true, in that the culture plays into the person giving a higher score.
I personally, think it is the first, and while I think this is an important study to do, it needs to be much more objective than having people of different countries score their own country.
Be very carefull of these organizations sending you on free or reduced fare trips to foreign countries to teach English. You lose out on a great deal of flexability and money. They will control your schedule and take most of the money--providing you with only a "free" trip.
My advice is to pick a country, pack a backpack, buy an airplane ticket, buy a lonely planet guidebook, and just go. Once you are there and find a hostel to stay in, you will meet people that can help you with finding a job. You might also realize once you are there, and in the budget places that the little money you had saved up will actually survive quite a while.
Just go. Things will work themselves out once you are there. The hardest thing is picking a country or continent. I'm leaving for Southeast Asia next week if you need a place to start out!
http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PT O2&Sect2=HITOFF&p=1&u=/netahtml/search-bool.html&r =1&f=G&l=50&co1=AND&d=ft00&s1=PacketShaper&OS=Pack etShaper&RS=PacketShaper
If you are buying servers, and rack space is expensive, of course you buy the best. But most workstations and home computers should probably be bought on the knee of the curve.
That is, you make a very simple graph of speeds and prices. There is historicaly a point on the graph where it changes from being relatively flat to relatively verticle. Buy the system in that spot.
I'm all for anything that gives me cleaner air to breath. Just NIMBY. Think what these things will do to property value on ocean front property.
From the tone of the article, it sounds as if the writer is more concerned with the money already invested. I understand it is really frustrating to spend a lot of time on a project that doesn't pan out, but upgrading the software on the space shuttle is a serious endevour.
First of all, finding hardware, or having replacement parts made is not a big deal. Schematics exist for all the chips they use, and even low volume reproduction of the chips won't cost more than this new software they are developing.
Secondly, the space shuttle works, it has worked for years. There are major flaws in the entire design of the space shuttle. IMHO the entire space shuttle needs to be redesigned. No software redesign will fix the major flaws of the shuttle.
Lastly, if true OO approaches were used in the development of the software, then most of it should be able to be used for the next generation of shuttle vehicles.
So stop focusing on the narrow application of this software on an outdated Space Shuttle, and look to the future of spacecraft.
It looks to me like ignoring repeated attempts from ICANN to fix a problem is not the best business strategy.
What is amazing is not that they have incorrect data, but that after 15 months and repeated letters from ICANN about a single domain, that they still haven't done anything.
I guess if this is how they do business, its no wonder that they are rated so poorly in customer service.
Use your cell phone. If you read the FARS, part 91, you can use a cellphone. If you look at 91.21 it says:
Sec. 91.21
Portable electronic devices.
(a) Except as provided in paragraph (b) of this section, no person may operate, nor may any operator or pilot in command of an aircraft allow the operation of, any portable electronic device on any of the following U.S.-registered civil aircraft:
(1) Aircraft operated by a holder of an air carrier operating certificate or an operating certificate; or
(2) Any other aircraft while it is operated under IFR.
(b) Paragraph (a) of this section does not apply to--
(1) Portable voice recorders;
(2) Hearing aids;
(3) Heart pacemakers;
(4) Electric shavers; or
(5) Any other portable electronic device that the operator of the aircraft has determined will not cause interference with the navigation or communication system of the aircraft on which it is to be used.
(c) In the case of an aircraft operated by a holder of an air carrier operating certificate or an operating certificate, the determination required by paragraph (b)(5) of this section shall be made by that operator of the aircraft on which the particular device is to be used. In the case of other
aircraft, the determination may be made by the pilot in command or other operator of the aircraft.
So, if you aren't flying IFR, its automatically allowed. If you are flying IFR, then see 91.21(b)(5) which says that the operator may make a determination of whether or not intereference will exist... And 91.21(c) says that the opeartor in your case is the pilot in command.
The cell phone rule only applies to Commercial Aircraft. Unless as the pilot in command you want to dissallow yourself from using a cell phone. So... Use a cell phone it is the cheapest way.
The headline forgets to mention a couple of things. 1) The $80 CAD is equivelent of $50 USD. Thats what most people pay in the United States already. 2) They also offer a price break of $20 CAD to low users. Thats $12 USD. This is perfect for people like my parents who haven't switched, because all they do is e-mail and their dial-up while slow is worth the price. A few problems: 1) The bill. I don't know about you, but I already have enough surprises with my cell phone bill every month. I don't want to get on a cheap plan for Internet and be surprised to find that I downloaded one too many mp3's. 2) Could this be the new beginning of Internet beige boxing? How are they going to stop me from spoofing my neigbors IP address!!!
Pepsi won't be focusing on Pepsi this year, they are spending a good deal of ad time on Lipton Brisk.
Has Pepsi hit its peak, or is Pepsi just desperate for something new?
Also, Pepsi will NOT be the first commercial of the Superbowl. Slot 1A was lost by Pepsi in 1999. Now it belongs to Budweiser. I'm sure Pepsi is hitting themselves for not advertising two years ago. Thats OK though, Budweiser seems to do better ads than Pepsi anyway.