...they should let third parties use their servers because otherwise they will loose market share...
I suspect that AOL would not intentionally "let loose or release" their market share, although it is possible that they would fail to maintain it. Perhaps the word you were looking for was lose.
Congratulations! You have been participant #16 in my campaign to rid Slashdot of this error.
Alan Partridge, your participation in the cause is gratefully noted. However, I believe the responsibility for "then/than" was filled eearlier today. On the other hand, DefinitelyNotDefinatelyBoy would be a welcome addition to the team...
...and that which does looses mass. The loosing mass part has been proven in lab test...
I suspect that entities traveling near the speed of light do not actually "let loose or release" mass; that would imply that the entity is somehow capable of consciously manipulating its own mass. I believe the words you were looking for are loses and losing.
Congratulations! You have been participant #15 in my campaign to rid Slashdot of this error.
You loose reflection support and similar low level access to the runtime environment.
I do not think you would "let loose or release" reflection support and similar low level access; it is more likely that you would fail to retain this functionality. The word you were looking for is lose.
Congratulations! You have been participant #14 in my campaign to rid Slashdot of this error. (I nearly permitted you to escape due to your.de address, but upon reflection I realized that my message must reach the masses.)
I am grateful for your support, Dahan. Perhaps you will remember me the next time you have modpoints, so that my words to the skeptical masses may carry more weight.
While it is true that Sony "lets loose or releases" money on every PS2, in the sense that they sell the machine for less money than it costs to manufacture, I suspect that this was not exactly your intended meaning. The word you were looking for was lose.
Congratulations! You have been participant #13 in my campaign to rid Slashdot of this error.
I suspect that you would not "let loose or release" all those extra features; it is more likely that you would fail to retain those features. I believe the word you were looking for was lose.
Congratulations! You have been participant #12 in my campaign to rid Slashdot of this error.
Kind og like walking into a casino for the first time and winning a bunch of money. "I can't loose"
Judging from context, I suspect that you did not mean to say, "I can't 'let loose or release'." Perhaps the word you were looking for was lose.
Congratulations! You have been participant #11 in my campaign to rid Slashdot of this error. (Certainly there are other issues with your post, but they fall outside the scope of my duties as LoseNotLooseGuy.)
Very well Slarty, you have been counted. I am grateful for your support; perhaps you will remember me next time you have modpoints, so my words may carry more weight.
now watch me loose at least one karma point for being offtopic
To the best of my knowledge, it would not be possible for you to "let loose or release" one karma point, since Slash does not give you direct control over your own karma. Perhaps you meant to use the word lose.
Congratulations! You have been participant #10 in my campaign to rid Slashdot of this error.
I doubt that the PCs "let loose or release" 30 seconds every day; that would imply some sort of conscious effort on the part of the PC, not to mention control over the flow of time itself. I believe the word you were looking for was lose.
Congratulations! You have been participant #9 in my campaign to rid Slashdot of this error.
the crew knew they would probably loose their lives in this run
It is doubtful that the crew would "let loose or release" their lives; that sounds rather like suicide, and context would lead me to believe that was not your intended meaning. The word you were looking for was lose.
Congratulations AC, you have been participant #8 in my campaign to rid Slashdot of this error.
Your humble acceptance of my admonition is gratefully noted, perky, although referring to my crusade as "foolhardy" will undoubtedly prove to be shortsighted. Go forth and sin no more, lest you once again incur the wrath of LoseNotLooseGuy.
but we must not loose sight that the purpose is TO BENEFIT THE PUBLIC
I speculate that you did not mean to say, "...we must not 'let loose or release'sight that the purpose is to benefit the public." After all "releasing sight" is a rather ambiguous metaphor at best. The word you were looking for was lose.
Congratulations! You have been participant #7 in my campaign to rid Slashdot of this error.
Even if they eventually loose the case, it still makes them look good, and generates a lot of good publicicty.
While Elcomsoft probably is interested in "letting loose or releasing" the case, in the sense that they have filed for dismissal, context would indicate that this is not what you meant to say. The word you were looking for was lose.
Congratulations! You have been participant #6 in my campaign to rid Slashdot of this error.
I think that whilst the BBC sometimes looses the plot, most of its output is of extremely high quality.
While it is difficult to be certain, I suspect you did not mean to say that the BBC sometimes "lets loose or releases" the plot. I think the word you wanted here was loses.
Congratulations! You have been participant #5 in my crusade to rid Slashdot of this error.
This could alienate the very people that are needed at this time and cause Linux to loose steam.
Since Linux is computer software and not a kettle of hot water, I suspect you did not mean to say that Linux might "let loose or release" steam. The word you were looking for was lose.
Congratulations! You have been participant #4 in my campaign to rid Slashdot of this error.
Slashdot Mirror
I suspect that AOL would not intentionally "let loose or release" their market share, although it is possible that they would fail to maintain it. Perhaps the word you were looking for was lose.
Congratulations! You have been participant #16 in my campaign to rid Slashdot of this error.
Alan Partridge, your participation in the cause is gratefully noted. However, I believe the responsibility for "then/than" was filled eearlier today. On the other hand, DefinitelyNotDefinatelyBoy would be a welcome addition to the team...
I suspect that entities traveling near the speed of light do not actually "let loose or release" mass; that would imply that the entity is somehow capable of consciously manipulating its own mass. I believe the words you were looking for are loses and losing.
Congratulations! You have been participant #15 in my campaign to rid Slashdot of this error.
You loose reflection support and similar low level access to the runtime environment.
I do not think you would "let loose or release" reflection support and similar low level access; it is more likely that you would fail to retain this functionality. The word you were looking for is lose.
Congratulations! You have been participant #14 in my campaign to rid Slashdot of this error. (I nearly permitted you to escape due to your .de address, but upon reflection I realized that my message must reach the masses.)
I am grateful for your support, Dahan. Perhaps you will remember me the next time you have modpoints, so that my words to the skeptical masses may carry more weight.
Very well uninet, you are forgiven. Now go forth and err no more, lest you once again incur the wrath of LoseNotLooseGuy!
Yes I know that they loose money on every PS2
While it is true that Sony "lets loose or releases" money on every PS2, in the sense that they sell the machine for less money than it costs to manufacture, I suspect that this was not exactly your intended meaning. The word you were looking for was lose.
Congratulations! You have been participant #13 in my campaign to rid Slashdot of this error.
Plus you loose all those extra features.
I suspect that you would not "let loose or release" all those extra features; it is more likely that you would fail to retain those features. I believe the word you were looking for was lose.
Congratulations! You have been participant #12 in my campaign to rid Slashdot of this error.
Hmmm. Every good superhero does need a sidekick. Yes, I would welcome your assistance in cleansing Slashdot from the perils of grammatical evil.
In the meantime, you have been counted amongst the supporters of the Cause.
Kind og like walking into a casino for the first time and winning a bunch of money. "I can't loose"
Judging from context, I suspect that you did not mean to say, "I can't 'let loose or release'." Perhaps the word you were looking for was lose.
Congratulations! You have been participant #11 in my campaign to rid Slashdot of this error. (Certainly there are other issues with your post, but they fall outside the scope of my duties as LoseNotLooseGuy.)
Very well Slarty, you have been counted. I am grateful for your support; perhaps you will remember me next time you have modpoints, so my words may carry more weight.
I shall leave that to you, good sir, for I am the great LoseNotLooseGuy, not RidiculousNotRediculousGuy.
now watch me loose at least one karma point for being offtopic
To the best of my knowledge, it would not be possible for you to "let loose or release" one karma point, since Slash does not give you direct control over your own karma. Perhaps you meant to use the word lose.
Congratulations! You have been participant #10 in my campaign to rid Slashdot of this error.
Some PC's seems to loose up to 30 secs every day.
I doubt that the PCs "let loose or release" 30 seconds every day; that would imply some sort of conscious effort on the part of the PC, not to mention control over the flow of time itself. I believe the word you were looking for was lose.
Congratulations! You have been participant #9 in my campaign to rid Slashdot of this error.
the crew knew they would probably loose their lives in this run
It is doubtful that the crew would "let loose or release" their lives; that sounds rather like suicide, and context would lead me to believe that was not your intended meaning. The word you were looking for was lose.
Congratulations AC, you have been participant #8 in my campaign to rid Slashdot of this error.
GSloop, your humility pleases me. You are forgiven. Go forth and err no more, lest you once again incur the wrath of LoseNotLooseGuy!
Day or night, my quest does not cease. Wherever there is improper looseness, LoseNotLooseGuy shall strike with vengeance!
Your humble acceptance of my admonition is gratefully noted, perky, although referring to my crusade as "foolhardy" will undoubtedly prove to be shortsighted. Go forth and sin no more, lest you once again incur the wrath of LoseNotLooseGuy.
but we must not loose sight that the purpose is TO BENEFIT THE PUBLIC
I speculate that you did not mean to say, "...we must not 'let loose or release'sight that the purpose is to benefit the public." After all "releasing sight" is a rather ambiguous metaphor at best. The word you were looking for was lose.
Congratulations! You have been participant #7 in my campaign to rid Slashdot of this error.
Even if they eventually loose the case, it still makes them look good, and generates a lot of good publicicty.
While Elcomsoft probably is interested in "letting loose or releasing" the case, in the sense that they have filed for dismissal, context would indicate that this is not what you meant to say. The word you were looking for was lose.
Congratulations! You have been participant #6 in my campaign to rid Slashdot of this error.
Indeed LMCBoy, my campaign, my crusade if you will, began 01/28/02 at 9:13pm.
Your support is gratefully noted, for I am forced to acknowledge that I face nigh-insurmountable odds.
I think that whilst the BBC sometimes looses the plot, most of its output is of extremely high quality.
While it is difficult to be certain, I suspect you did not mean to say that the BBC sometimes "lets loose or releases" the plot. I think the word you wanted here was loses.
Congratulations! You have been participant #5 in my crusade to rid Slashdot of this error.
This could alienate the very people that are needed at this time and cause Linux to loose steam.
Since Linux is computer software and not a kettle of hot water, I suspect you did not mean to say that Linux might "let loose or release" steam. The word you were looking for was lose.
Congratulations! You have been participant #4 in my campaign to rid Slashdot of this error.
Seriously, I thought it was 'news for nerds' not loosers.
I suspect you did not actually mean to talk about "loosers", namely people who release things. I believe the word you were looking for was losers.
Congratulations! You have been participant #3 in my campaign to rid Slashdot of this error.
I shall leave that one to you, good sir, for I am LoseNotLooseGuy, not ICouldn'tGiveA...NotICouldGiveA...Guy.