Slashdot Mirror


Sony Announces Version 1.0 Of Linux for Playstation 2

ResearchBuzz writes: "Sony has announced the May 2002 release of Linux (for Playstation 2) Release 1.0." He quotes from the press release: "The company expects the kit to sell for about $199 USD when it is made available in May 2002 exclusively through its website, http://www.us.playstation.com."

458 comments

  1. Wow by bleak+sky · · Score: 1

    Looks like the hardware alone that comes in the kit is worth the $199!

    Too bad I don't have a PS2...

    1. Re:Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bush says "All Americans to serve 2 years in the Military!" FUCK yes. This will not fly.

    2. Re:Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Specifically he said:
      ...Americans to volunteer to help both their neighbors and their country, suggesting everyone commit to two years or 4,000 hours of voluntary service over their lifetime.
      That's from CNN. Specifically this is with American Peace Corps? Also suggested was enlistment into Homeland defence. And abolisment of Milita.
    3. Re:Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Milita are terrorist organizations anyway. So screw them.

    4. Re:Wow by BasilBibi · · Score: 1

      Too bad the kernel is Jurassic...

    5. Re:Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's funny. At least in the UK, and probably
      stateside too, the military was being scaled down
      last I heard. The places where military service
      are compulsory (or even expected), AFAIK, are simply
      the ones who can't afford to maintain a real army.



      So what other reason could there be for encouraging
      civilians to spend time in the military? Hmmm...
      all that break 'em down and build 'em up stuff at
      the very start of training seems to be something
      that everyone would surely get. And if I recall
      correctly, that stage has a specific purpose. Ahh,
      yes.. that's the part where they brainwash you into
      obeying orders and being a machine for blind
      patriotism.



      This whole thing's looking more and
      more like one of those futuristic sci-fi films
      all the time -- the ones where everyone is a slave
      to the system, and only a few underground rebels
      even realise what's been lost. Well, I for one
      will be with the rebels all the way. And if one
      day I find out that Afghan terrorists are fighting
      the system alongside me, then it'll be because we've
      put aside our small religious differences and
      realised what's happening to our freedom is
      MUCH more important.

    6. Re:Wow by thetman · · Score: 1

      I don't think Afghan terrorists are as easily fooled by trolls as you.

      ahhhahahaaaaaaa

    7. Re:Wow by sopwath · · Score: 1

      If this little thing called 'religion' is no big deal, then why are so many of those Afghani's ready to blindly follow a madman to thier death? It might not mean much to you, but it means a lot to them and lots of other people on this earth.

      good luck,
      sopwath

    8. Re:Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Amendment II - A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed."

      Yep, sounds like terrorists to me. You dumb ass.

      If you are a U.S. citizen between the ages of 17 and 65, YOU ARE part of the militia. Don't believe me? Look it up...

    9. Re:Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Umm, has anyone noticed.

      Cost of PS2: $250
      Cost of Linux kit: $199

      Cost of required XGA monitor $50+

      Total without monitor: $449

      For $400 you can buy/build a kick ass Celeron or Duron based system with all the features that the PS2 linux box has.

      Cost breakdown:

      equivalent grafix card: $100
      CPU + momboard $100
      USB keyboard $15
      NIC $20
      40 GB HDD $75
      Misc crap(RAM? + case) $90
      Linux $FREE

      Total: $400

      So you save money AND you get a better system!
      Think what you can do with the $49 u have left over .. maybe pump up the graphics card?
      The CPU + motherboard expenditure of $100 gets youa 1 GHz processor which is four times faster than whats in PS2.

    10. Re:Wow by zeno_2 · · Score: 1

      Hmm.. I had forgotten that Sony was portraying this as the cheapest possible way of getting a linux box in your house. Sure you could get something cheaper, sony is not saying you can't.

      This is a hobbist tool, not something your going to see next to HP and Compaq computers.

      It is a little expensive, it was about the price I would guessed anyway. I don't mind paying for it, yes, I could probably buy *similar* things in a store for cheaper, but you wont end up with a ps2 with linux installed.

      Just be happy they are releasing this kit.. would it have been better if they didn't release it at all? Stop bitching, im happy its going to be released, I will pay 200 bucks for it..

      So I guess I really don't understand why your bitching, other then the fact that you can bitch..

    11. Re:Wow by tauntalum · · Score: 1
      People who buy this kit already have a PS2 to play games. This linux kit will bring even more fun to your PS2...

      With this kit, it will be possible to play nethack on my PS2. Or run EMACS...

      If you can't see the inherent value of that, then you might need to re-evaluate your love for linux.

    12. Re:Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      mod this up.

    13. Re:Wow by jo42 · · Score: 1

      Hey, we can finally have a Beowulf cluster of these...

  2. TEXT OF THE ARTICLE: by ekrout · · Score: 0, Redundant

    TEXT OF THE ARTICLE in case it's Slashdotted:

    Leader in Computer Entertainment Responds to Consumer Demand by Supporting
    Popular Open-Source Linux Operating System

    LINUXWORLD CONFERENCE & EXPO, NEW YORK, Jan. 30 /PRNewswire/ --
    Sony Computer Entertainment America Inc. announced today that it is set to
    release "Linux (for PlayStation 2)" Release 1.0, targeted toward the Linux
    development community in North America. Designed as a hobbyist development
    environment, users can not only run the wide variety of computer applications
    written for the Linux operating system, but also create original programs and
    applications designed to run on "Linux (for PlayStation 2)." The company
    expects the kit to sell for about $199 USD when it is made available in
    May 2002 exclusively through its website, http://www.us.playstation.com .
    (Photo: NewsCom: http://www.newscom.com/cgi-bin/prnh/20000510/SFW10 4-a )
    As announced at the LinuxWorld Conference & Expo 2002, the leading event
    focused exclusively on Linux and open source solutions, "Linux (for
    PlayStation 2)" will for the first time allow developers in North America
    complete access to the PlayStation 2 runtime environment and system manuals.
    The "Linux (for PlayStation 2)" Release 1.0 kit includes:
    -- Internal hard disk drive for PlayStation 2 (HDD) with 40 GB capacity
    -- Network Adaptor (Ethernet) (for PlayStation 2) with 100 Base T Ethernet
    interface
    -- Linux Kernel version 2.2.1 (with USB device support)
    -- "Linux (for PlayStation 2)" Version 1.0 software distribution on
    two DVDs
    -- gcc 2.95.2 and glibc 2.2.2 with VU assemblers
    -- XFree86 3.3.6 with PlayStation 2 GS support
    -- Computer monitor adaptor (for PlayStation 2) (with audio connectors)
    -- USB Keyboard and mouse (for PlayStation 2)

    In addition to the "Linux (for PlayStation 2)" kit, users must have a
    standard North American PlayStation 2 (SCPH 30001, SCPH 30001R, SCPH 35001GT),
    a Memory Card (8M) (for PlayStation 2), and a VESA monitor. The graphics
    output requires a high-resolution computer display, with standard output set
    as XGA (1024 x 768 resolution); home televisions cannot be used as monitors.
    Computer displays supporting "sync on green" are mandatory.
    Linux use is growing at unprecedented levels and according to IDC, a
    leading market research firm, the Linux operating system marketshare is
    expected to reach 38 percent worldwide by 2004. In response to many requests
    from the Japanese Linux society to enjoy Linux programming on PlayStation 2,
    Linux Beta Version Kit was made available to approximately 7,900 enthusiasts
    in Japan in July 2001. Since then, overwhelming numbers of requests have
    continued on Linux community websites all over the world, with approximately
    9,500 people joining the movement.
    Also, according to questionnaires conducted by Sony Computer Entertainment
    America and Sony Computer Entertainment Europe, more than 28,000 people have
    expressed interest in the "Linux (for PlayStation 2)" development kit to date.
    This led the company to release a new version as Release 1.0 to support users
    of the worldwide Linux community. The company responded to feedback received
    from the Beta test program in Japan and modifications were incorporated for
    "Linux (for PlayStation 2)" Release 1.0.
    Customer support and other community-based features will be handled
    through the North American PlayStation 2 Linux website,
    http://www.playstation2-linux.com . More details regarding the "Linux (for
    PlayStation 2)" release, FAQs and related news will be disseminated through
    this website, as it becomes available.

    About Sony Computer Entertainment America Inc.
    Sony Computer Entertainment America Inc. continues to redefine the
    entertainment lifestyle with its PlayStation(R) and PS one(TM) game console,
    and the PlayStation(R)2 computer entertainment system. The PlayStation 2
    computer entertainment system is set to revolutionize the home entertainment
    market, offering the most compelling interactive content and the capability to
    be used as a network terminal in the coming broadband era.
    Recognized as the undisputed industry leader, Sony Computer Entertainment
    America Inc. markets the PlayStation family of products and develops,
    publishes, markets and distributes software for the PS one game console and
    the PlayStation 2 computer entertainment system for the North American market.
    Based in Foster City, Calif. Sony Computer Entertainment America Inc. serves
    as headquarters for all North American operations and is a wholly-owned
    subsidiary of Sony Computer Entertainment Inc.

    NOTE: "Linux" is a trademark or registered trademark of Linus Torvalds in
    the United States and other countries.
    PlayStation and the PlayStation logo, PS one and PS2 are registered
    trademarks of Sony Computer Entertainment Inc. All other trademarks are
    property of their respective owners.

    --

    If you celebrate Xmas, befriend me (538
    1. Re:TEXT OF THE ARTICLE: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Arrgh--
      I just threw out 500 sync on green HP monitors because they were useless.....
      why did they do this

    2. Re:TEXT OF THE ARTICLE: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I thought you died today, Alan?

    3. Re:TEXT OF THE ARTICLE: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fricking karma whore. Looks like some idiot modded him up too. I wish I had moderator points left to nuke this post.

    4. Re:TEXT OF THE ARTICLE: by YorkshireONE · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      You must be sexually fustrated if a little thing like this causes you to fume.
      You are a sad little man, you trot out phrases like "Damn karma whores". I always thought whores sold and Johns sought.

      ONCE AND FOR ALL.
      People post the source article so when the server is slashdotted, we can still read it.

      You are the damn karma John, Alan Thicke.

    5. Re:TEXT OF THE ARTICLE: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      Um, so you're saying the only time it's "proper" to copy + paste the text of a link is after it has been Slashdotted? Do you realize how fucking stupid you sound?

    6. Re:TEXT OF THE ARTICLE: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      software distribution on two DVDs

      What the hell is on those? Multiple versions of every Linux application known to man?

  3. Great! by God_Retired · · Score: 1

    Now I can try to edit my rc files with a gamepad. As if I wasn't already having a hard time.

    1. Re:Great! by datm · · Score: 0

      I think that's the reason that the PS II HAS USB ports. I know of Keyboards that are already in the market for it.

      --
      Datm
    2. Re:Great! by datm · · Score: 0

      -- Computer monitor adaptor (for PlayStation 2) (with audio connectors) -- USB Keyboard and mouse (for PlayStation 2) There: keyboard included. Way Cool. Look it has a monitor adaptor. I wonder if you can use this to play games. Better yet I wonder if you'll be able to buy it separatly.

      --
      Datm
    3. Re:Great! by amuro98 · · Score: 1

      As with the Japanese linux kit, you won't be able to use the monitor adapter to play games or DVD movies.

      The video routines aren't interchangable, unfortunatly.

  4. Kit... by Jace+of+Fuse! · · Score: 2

    This will be a neat kit, and I'll likely spring for it. The hardware is worth it alone...

    But out of serious curiousity -- I wonder how hard it will be to get BSD running on it... Hmm.

    --

    "Everything you know is wrong. (And stupid.)"

    Moderation Totals: Wrong=2, Stupid=3, Total=5.
    1. Re:Kit... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      http://netbsd.org/Ports/playstation2/

      Not too hard it seems.

    2. Re:Kit... by Jace+of+Fuse! · · Score: 2

      From that site: The playstation2 can not read CD-Rs.

      UGH! That kind of puts a cramp in what you can do with the machine if you can't burn an OS of choice to run on it.

      I think that's an arguement for the legality of MOD chips and adapters.

      "But I don't want to pirate games, I just want to install a new OS."

      --

      "Everything you know is wrong. (And stupid.)"

      Moderation Totals: Wrong=2, Stupid=3, Total=5.
    3. Re:Kit... by baka_boy · · Score: 3, Interesting

      But, looking at Apple's DVD-R compatibility list, they say that a PS2 works fine.

      Unfortunately, I'm sure that Sony won't allow redistribution of their accellerated X server; otherwise, you might be able to ship pure Linux game packages on DVD-R.

    4. Re:Kit... by uglyduckling · · Score: 1
      Its_got_an_ethernet_adaptor.

      So no problems there then.

    5. Re:Kit... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      NetBSD allready runs on this thing.

      Here is the link.

    6. Re:Kit... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Add a USB external tuner/frame grabber and you have a Tivo. And a Linux box. And a DVD player.

      Oh, and a PS2...

    7. Re:Kit... by Gossy · · Score: 1

      You can get boot loaders that let you read CD-Rs, never tried them (no PS2), but I'm informed they work - how do you think people pirate PS2 games?

  5. Imagine a beo......!!!! by Kasmiur · · Score: 1, Troll

    to beat the dead horse....

    I wonder if Wine or lindows would efficiently run on this now. The idea of perhaps running Bleem or some other emulators on the PS 2 would be great. Perhaps a dreamcast emulator evuantally. The hardware is there. Just need someone with lots of free time.

    Or perhaps someone could write a DeCSS program that would run under it:-)

    But of course I am a idiot.

    --
    -THIS SPACE FOR RENT!
    1. Re:Imagine a beo......!!!! by mlk · · Score: 1

      Why run WINE? So you can run open source windows software? (Wine is not an emulator, and need an X86 to run windows Software, the same will be true to Lindows at a guess).

      Running BOCH would be cool :)

      (as would porting OBOS to it ;-)

      --
      Wow, I should not post when knackered.
    2. Re:Imagine a beo......!!!! by Kasmiur · · Score: 1

      DOH Wine was first to come to my mind. I keep forgetting Wine Is Not a Emulator.

      Someone mentioned porting MAME to it. Which would be rather cool.

      I wonder how well this would do with SETI program on it?

      --
      -THIS SPACE FOR RENT!
    3. Re:Imagine a beo......!!!! by SPiKe · · Score: 1

      Wine will probably not run on this kit, seeing as it only runs on the x86 platform.

    4. Re:Imagine a beo......!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why do you want to run Bleem when the ps2 already emulates ps1 ?

      >But of course I am a idiot.
      Yep.

    5. Re:Imagine a beo......!!!! by wheany · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yeah, but remember that Mame Ass Mot an Emulator too

    6. Re:Imagine a beo......!!!! by slashdot.org · · Score: 1

      I wonder if Wine or lindows would efficiently run on this now

      Is the PS2 an x86? Wine only emulates the Windows API calls but certainly does not emulate the CPU.

    7. Re:Imagine a beo......!!!! by neafevoc · · Score: 0

      I wonder if Wine or lindows would efficiently run on this now. The idea of perhaps running Bleem or some other emulators on the PS 2 would be great. Perhaps a dreamcast emulator evuantally. The hardware is there. Just need someone with lots of free time.

      Dude, that's so cool. My PS2 that would eventually run Linux, which in turn runs Wine, which could probably run the some DC emulator in the works, and that can run the snes9x port about a year ago!

      Finally, I'll have a good controller to play Final Fantasy VI! (Instead of this cheapo MS USB gamepad I bought for snes9x.)

    8. Re:Imagine a beo......!!!! by Progoth · · Score: 1
      Finally, I'll have a good controller to play Final Fantasy VI! (Instead of this cheapo MS USB gamepad I bought for snes9x.)

      I bought a PS1 dual shock controller and one of those little $12 usb adaptors. works great under linux and windows, works really well for snes9x/psx emulators. With a little imagination it makes an OK controller for N64 games.

      If I had the funds I'd like to get a usb adaptor that supported force feedback.

    9. Re:Imagine a beo......!!!! by Monkelectric · · Score: 1

      Is there a dos emulator that dosen't require the x86 platform? I bet this would make a *sweet* "old games" box -- 40 gigs could hold alot of sierra / lucas arts titles :)

      --

      Religion is a gateway psychosis. -- Dave Foley

    10. Re:Imagine a beo......!!!! by baka_boy · · Score: 2

      Sorry, but Wine only works on x86 boxes, not anything running Linux. You could run Bochs, but from the performance I've seen it put out on a 500MHz G4 system, I wouldn't recommend it.

      Unfortunately, you're going to have a hard time with a lot of normal Linux apps on one of these bad boys, given the extremely limited (and poorly expandable) RAM.

    11. Re:Imagine a beo......!!!! by FrostedChaos · · Score: 1
      Wine is not an emulator. It will not run on playstation hardware. And the dreamcast port of snes9x is slow enough on an actual Dreamcast, that to run it under several layers of evolution would be excruciating.

      --
      "Any connection between your reality and mine is purely coincidental." -Slashdot
    12. Re:Imagine a beo......!!!! by Inoshiro · · Score: 2

      "But of course I am a idiot."

      A sage signature considering WINE (thus Lindows) require an x86 processor.

      Bochs would work, but very slowly. Cheaper to make a real PC for the $$ of a PS2 and get more performance to boot.

      --
      --
      Internet Explorer (n): Another bug -- that is, a feature that can't be turned off -- in Windows.
    13. Re:Imagine a beo......!!!! by mab · · Score: 1
    14. Re:Imagine a beo......!!!! by GauteL · · Score: 2

      Wine will most certainly not run properly. This is a totally different architecture from x86, which is the only architecture Wine currently runs any good on.
      Even if it was ported to PS 2, you would probably have trouble running existing Windows-binaries.

    15. Re:Imagine a beo......!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well done you moron, you trotted out some completely stupid garbage and got modded up by equally retarded moderators!

    16. Re:Imagine a beo......!!!! by Mister+Snee · · Score: 2

      Or perhaps someone could write a DeCSS program that would run under it:-)

      The PS2 already plays DVD's. Maybe someone could do a DeCSS "port" that uses the tables and functions already built into the firmware. ;)

      The first-ever twenty-byte DeCSS binary. Heh.

    17. Re:Imagine a beo......!!!! by Graspee_Leemoor · · Score: 1

      "Finally, I'll have a good controller to play Final Fantasy VI!"

      Just buy Final Fantasy Anthology for the ps1 and run it on the ps2. That's what I did.

      graspee

    18. Re:Imagine a beo......!!!! by synapz · · Score: 2, Informative

      The idea of perhaps running Bleem or some other emulators on the PS 2 would be great.

      Hmmm. Bleem is a PS1 emulator. The PS2 actually runs PS1 games in HARDWARE. So, while it might win you some geek-points to run a PS1 emulator, on top of a windows emulator, on top of linux on your PS2, those of us who like playing games at more than 5fps will probably just insert the PS1 CD in the drive before we power up our PS2s ;-)

      But then... since when has Linux been about doing things the easy way?

    19. Re:Imagine a beo......!!!! by duren686 · · Score: 1

      Sorry to rain on your parade, but the ps2 only runs at like 3, maybe 4 MHz higher than the dreamcast (someone's going to prove me wrong with some BS "66 million polys per second" hardware spec but whatever) so it will have about one-third the chance of my 600 Athlon running a Dreamcast emulator. Which hasn't happened yet.

      Besides, ps2 won't read GDs.

      --
      Y2K Compliant since the late 1890s
    20. Re:Imagine a beo......!!!! by k_187 · · Score: 2, Informative

      The main processor of the Dreamcast runs at 200 mHz. The main processor of the PS2 runs at 300. The main processor of the Gamecube runs at 405, I think. And the xbox at 733. I'm not getting into the differences between graphics chips.

      --
      11 was a racehorse
      12 was 12
      1111 Race
      12112
    21. Re:Imagine a beo......!!!! by Craig+Maloney · · Score: 2

      You haven't been to http://www.otakunozoku.com then, have you? Every dev console he gets he ports MAME to. I highly doubt Linux on the PS2 would fare much better than native code, though.

    22. Re:Imagine a beo......!!!! by CyberKnet · · Score: 1

      Of course, being a geek, you know that it is Mhz AND IPC which will denote how "fast" your CPU is running. So nobody needs to remind you. right? I thought so.

      --
      Video meliora proboque deteriora sequor - Ovidius
    23. Re:Imagine a beo......!!!! by zeno_2 · · Score: 1

      Im pretty sure WINE doens't emulate anything, it translates Windows API calls.

    24. Re:Imagine a beo......!!!! by Spyffe · · Score: 1
      Hey! Wait a second! Looking at my Windows NT (4.0) installation disk, I see that it supports:
      • Intel (x86)
      • Digital (Alpha)
      • SGI (Mips)
      • IBM (PowerPC)

      Personally, I can't wait to modify the Linux boot scripts and have frickin' Windows NT system software (Wordpad and stuff) running on a patched WINE on a PS2.

      Of course, afterwards I'll have to take a shower just to wash the stench of sulfur out...
      --
      Sigmentation fault - core dumped
    25. Re:Imagine a beo......!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You have to remember that the Emotion Engine is a true 128-bit SIMD-capable, parallel RISC processor. Despite its relatively slow 300MHz clock speed, it has a theoretical floating-point performance of 6.2 GFLOPS, which, I believe, is still higher than anything Intel or AMD can dish out and is certainly much higher than the Gekko inside the Gamecube or the PIII 733 inside the Xbox. The Gamecube and Xbox concentrated their FLOPS on the graphics processors, which isn't useful for general application purposes. It'd be really interesting and astounding if a Beowulf cluster can indeed be build from a bunch of PS2's, especially if the full power of the EE can be efficiently utilized.

  6. Not on TV, Requires Sync on Green by srw · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Is this really useful? You need a monitor which supports Sync-on-green to use this. I guess we won't be able to use this as a set-top box.

    1. Re:Not on TV, Requires Sync on Green by fliplap · · Score: 4, Interesting
      Actually, old Sync-on-green monitors are very very cheap. I've met places that are giving away 21" old x-term monitors, almost all of which are sync-on-green.

      And, IIRC, you can still use this with a normal TV, you just won't get that great of resolution. I'm not sure how it would work with say a 1080i HDTV.

    2. Re:Not on TV, Requires Sync on Green by Bigger+R · · Score: 2, Informative

      Here's a blurb on an adapter that should do the trick for you...
      http://lists.debian.org/debian-hppa/2001/debian- hp pa-200111/msg00001.html

      --
      Beta only seems to work for Google. Such a shame.
    3. Re:Not on TV, Requires Sync on Green by warrior · · Score: 1

      IIRC, aren't the RGB component inputs on most HD televisions "Sync On Green"? I think this is going to look really nice on my WEGA :)

      --
      Intel transfer the difficult from Hadware to software, for get more power, programmer need more technology. -- chinaitn
    4. Re:Not on TV, Requires Sync on Green by vrmlknight · · Score: 1

      why should i spend another $100 the PS2 --> Linux kit should have something like that included for the price

      --
      This must be Thursday, I never could get the hang of Thursdays.
    5. Re:Not on TV, Requires Sync on Green by AFaus · · Score: 1

      >And, IIRC, you can still use this with a normal >TV, you just won't get that great of resolution. >I'm not sure how it would work with say a 1080i >HDTV No, the article says it simply won't work unless you have a computer monitor.

    6. Re:Not on TV, Requires Sync on Green by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is trival to make a sync separator to extract the H & V sync signals out of a handfull of jelly bean parts. Anyone that calls himself/herself a hardware hacker should be able to do this.

      Why the heck they are doing this to save $1.00 ?

    7. Re:Not on TV, Requires Sync on Green by onceler · · Score: 1

      Indeed, I have an old 21" monitor that only does sync-on-green. Dirt cheap, hard to get working - and it will be unusable on the PS2.

      You know why?

      Well, to get it working on a normal PC, you need to give it sync-on-green (the PS2 does that for you, but keep readong for why that's not good enough). Given $5 in parts, a soldering iron, and the ability to use it, an appropriate dongle can be made to take the output from a standard video card (which gives r, g, b, hsync, vsync on 5 separate pins), and combines them in the appropriate way. Circuit diagrams easily available - do a web search.

      The real problem, however, is that those old monitors are almost certainly fixed-sync. That means they will only work if your hsync is at just the right frequency, and that almost certainly isn't one of the vesa standard modes your pc puts out. It's also probably out of the range a "normal" monitor can handle. So, while you *can* set X up to work on that old monitor, doing so is a royal PITA, and you'll be switching monitors back and forth for hours. Been there, done that.

      When setting up your PS2, it will pe putting out a standard VESA mode, and you won't be able to tweak it (not without a monitor to see what you're doing, anyway...)

  7. MAME by BlueJay465 · · Score: 3, Funny

    Great, now I can port all those old arcade games from 10 and 20 years ago onto 21st century platform. Who woulda thunk it?

    1. Re:MAME by FauxPasIII · · Score: 2

      http://www.dcemulation.com/dcemu-mamedc.htm

      On a VGA monitor no less. Dreamcast forever baby !

      --
      25% Funny, 25% Insightful, 25% Informative, 25% Troll
  8. Don't fret the $199 by Mr.+Uptime · · Score: 1, Troll
    Although the price tag may sound steep, especially if you're like me and have most of the parts (hard drive, USB keyboard, etc.) left over from your former dot-com job, third-party vendors are hard at work to make your PS2 Linux experience more pleasurable and cost-effective. Some of the PS2 hardware that I've seen on sale at eBay and on Usenet are:
    • VGA monitor adaptor: $7. There's no logic in the thing; it's just a cable with two connectors.
    • USB keyboard and mouse kit: $15. It's no "Microsoft Natural" keyboard but a cheap Taiwanese knockoff will do the job just fine.
    • Linux CD-ROMs: $2 - $23. One was a prerelease of the Sony distribution, and one was a hacked up version of Debian, complete with a Playstation apt source preinstalled.
    • Network adaptor: $22. It uses the Xircom adaptor, IIRC.
    • Used 20GB hard drive: $47. It's even a 7200rpm ATA-66 dealie.
    The point being, of course, that Sony is being very opportunistic with its Linux release. All of the hardware can be had for well under $100, and the software is Free as in GPL and can't legally be sold at a profit.

    But what else did you expect from a member of the RIAA cartel?

    Mr. Uptime

    1. Re:Don't fret the $199 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I can't believe people on Slashdot, of all places, still don't understand the GPL at all. If I wanted to, I could make my own Linux distro and charge you $1 million for it, the GPL only requires I provide you with the source code.

      It doesn't matter whether you decide to believe Sony is profiting on the hardware or the software, it obviously took them some effort (more than making yet another x86 distro) to port this, so quit whining and don't buy it if you don't want it.

    2. Re:Don't fret the $199 by tutal · · Score: 2, Insightful

      >software is Free as in GPL and can't legally be sold at a profit.

      Umm, no. You can sell GPL software, and make it fairly big... ever hear of a little company called IBM, or perhaps Red Hat? Last time I checked they both sold Linux solutions. And Linux is free as in beer, go to www.gnu.org.

    3. Re:Don't fret the $199 by Mr.+Uptime · · Score: 1
      My mistake, I didn't mean to write "can't legally be sold at a profit."

      I did mean to convey that there's nothing Sony can do to force people to pay for the software.

      But they're still being greedy. They're slapping a $199 price tag on some cheap commodity hardware and some Free software. Consumers would be a lot happier if they just shipped the PS2 with Linux off the bat instead of trying to gouge us.

      Mr. Uptime

    4. Re:Don't fret the $199 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Playstations will, AFAIK, only boot off of signed media. They can copyright a CD image and distribute it however they want. The CD-ROMS you've seen for sale are probably illegal.

    5. Re:Don't fret the $199 by datm · · Score: 0

      I musthave not searched right 'cause the cheapest monitor adapter that I could find was 29.95.

      --
      Datm
    6. Re:Don't fret the $199 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      >I can't believe people on Slashdot, of all
      > places, still don't understand the GPL at all.

      You know what, I'm one of *many* people who **DON'T CARE** about the GPL and don't read it before going to bed. Not everyone is a fanatic Linux freak.

      Come on !

    7. Re:Don't fret the $199 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Troll

      You fucking assholes will never be happy.

      Some idiot gets Linux running in single user mode on some game platform and you all cry hooray, but a company invests time and money to do a proper job and all you do is complain about being fucking gouged. Cry me a fucking river.

    8. Re:Don't fret the $199 by jx100 · · Score: 1

      I believe you're actually paying for support there. It costs money for the books and all of the tech support that comes with those.

    9. Re:Don't fret the $199 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > All of the hardware can be had for well under $100

      You do realize that your parts total up to $114, are all used or cheap offbrands, and are still probably underpriced at that? Don't think new, quality components would be around twice that? Other people have already pointed out your little GPL misconception.

      Did you have a point or were you just trying to get some cheap karma for busting on "the man"?

      But what else did you expect from a Slashbot?

    10. Re:Don't fret the $199 by niola · · Score: 1, Redundant

      I must be missing something here because I actually don't get it. How can they justify the $199? As far as a Linux box goes, the only thing it has going for it is an ill graphics engine, which when you figure in the purchase price of the console is comparable price/performance to a GeForce 3 card. Not bad there, but for $199 I sure hope it comes with more then just a CD, mouse and keyboard. Nowadays you can actually build a lower end box for $200.

      I do have to say that I am sure I would be pleased justr to get bash prompt on a PS2, but one would have to think that $20-30 bucks would be a more reasonable price.

      --Jon

    11. Re:Don't fret the $199 by SrlKlr · · Score: 2, Informative


      the software is Free as in GPL and can't legally be sold at a profit.


      Actually, the under the GPL license, you can make all the money you want. It's free as in speech, not beer. You just have to make it available to others, including source code.

    12. Re:Don't fret the $199 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you buy computer equipment from Best Buy, or from the cheapest "OEM version only" vendor on Pricewatch?

      Why did you assume that the $23 Linux CD was worth using, and the $2 Linux CD wasn't? (Had you gone with the $2 CD, your total would be $93, not $114.)

      Many users on this site, myself included, are college students who don't have the luxury of much disposable income. So we would be more interested in buying "cheap offbrands" instead of letting Sony make a 300% margin on these parts.

      There's only one Bad Consumer(tm) here, and I'm replying to him.

      -wcb

    13. Re:Don't fret the $199 by seann · · Score: 1

      yeah because it's so hard to get a bash prompt on a game console.

      --
      I'm a big retard who forgot to log out of Slashdot on Mike's computer! LOOK AT ME.
    14. Re:Don't fret the $199 by pnatural · · Score: 1

      And Linux is free as in beer, go to www.gnu.org.

      your confused.

      the linux kernel is released under the GPL, which purports to be Free "as in speech". the GPL can be summarized as "use it for anything, but if you redistribute, you must redistribute the source and your modifications."

      the BSD license, of which linux has not, is free "as in beer". the BSD license may be summarized as "use it for anything."

      that is, of course, unless i am the one who is confused. :)

    15. Re:Don't fret the $199 by slashdot.org · · Score: 5, Interesting

      All of the hardware can be had for well under $100

      And this is exactly why Linux won't make it bigtime,- there's no money in it. I'm sorry to be so negative (but I'm sure the Karma Police will fix that) but here's a company that's actually doing something kewl, and what do they get? People bitching about 2 hundred fucking dollars.

      Have you looked a M$ XP license recently?

      I mean, what do you expect? Sony people preparing each individual kit by purchasing used gear from eBay???

      Show me an other company selling an add-on kit including harddrive, keyboard, mouse and network adaptor AND an OS for $200,-

    16. Re:Don't fret the $199 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dear Clueless,

      Your whining that someone won't sell you something cheaply because you found something not as good that cost less. Please stop.

      Thanks.

    17. Re:Don't fret the $199 by rhavyn · · Score: 2

      If you'd have read the article you'd have seen that it comes with a 40GB harddisk (for the internal bay) and 100 Mb/s ethernet adaptor, a usb keyboard and mouse, a vga output adaptor *and* the software. I don't know about you, but that looks like it could be about $200 worth of hardware alone if it's quality stuff.

    18. Re:Don't fret the $199 by anfloga · · Score: 1

      You are still a bit confused, although you are getting.. um... saner...

      Both the BSD and the Linux license (the GPL) are "Free as in speech", that is, they are designed to allow the user freedom -- freedom to the source, freedom to distribute, and freedom to modify and distribute the modifications. "Free as in beer" means only that you are allowed to use something for free, for example, "freeware". Freeware may still be closed-source (the source code is not distributed) and therefore not free "as in speech", but still is "free" in the monetary sense of meaning that no money is charged for it.

      Erik

    19. Re:Don't fret the $199 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Free as in troll... duh

    20. Re:Don't fret the $199 by evilviper · · Score: 2

      Only the GPL'ed software is freely redistributable.

      Anything they've made on their own may be legally kept propritary. No doubt, what they've done is necessary for Linux to work on the Playstation2. As for the Debian CD, I'll believe it when I see it.

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    21. Re:Don't fret the $199 by pnatural · · Score: 1

      oh, brainfart. you're right. i got licensing criss-crossed with freedoms. my bad. shouldn't post so late.

    22. Re:Don't fret the $199 by garcia · · Score: 2

      XP will run on a shitload faster and more machines than Linux for the PS2.

      I think what Sony is doing is great, don't get me wrong, but what the hell does XP have to do w/it?

      I can only run it on a PS2, I need to get a ton of other hardware, and other than "dork value" even as an avid supporter of Linux I don't see the point.

    23. Re:Don't fret the $199 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't care.

      Playstation II: $90 ?
      Linux: $190 ?
      They have a problem i think. Maybe they where subsidizing the hardware to charge the software (games) and Linux spoiled the profits (people buying it to run Linux alone :-)

      Maybe the want to team up with Linux and compete against the X-Box "home computer" for email, browsing, games and basic computing needs of the average family.

      But $199 is ridiculous unless they provide ALL the hardware needed except the TV or monitor.

    24. Re:Don't fret the $199 by hacker · · Score: 3, Flamebait
      I can't believe people on Slashdot, of all places, still don't understand the GPL at all. If I wanted to, I could make my own Linux distro and charge you $1 million for it, the GPL only requires I provide you with the source code.

      Have you not seen my rants aboutSony blatently and knowingly being in direct violation of the GPL. You can be certain that they are not going to give you a single line of that source code.

      After those stories were posted, and my comments made their way around the world, I received HUNDREDS of emails from people who worked with and for Sony, both as employees and contracted partners. They are doing this in a lot of places, not just with the PDA stuff I support and have consistantly called them on.

      Here's an excerpt from one of those emails, sufficiently anonymized to protect the innocent:

      For what it's worth I don't think that's the only GPL violation Sony is making. I work on [very high profile Sony gaming product] development tools here at [insert very well-known tool development company here] and I have several patches from Sony to [very well known GNU toolchain item here] for the [high-profile gaming product] but not their original sources to patch against. Plus some sources they compile/link into [same GNU toolchain item here] which they claim are proprietary and not provided.
      I don't trust them as far as I can throw their Aibo, 43" flatscreen HDTV, and 200 of their PDAs, and I also would not pay them a single dime to help fund their further violating of a license I believe in strongly, and also to line the coffers of the RIAA (note how "proudly" the RIAA touts Sony on that page) and support more of their audio copy protection schemes.

      Where do you think this $199.00 really goes?

    25. Re:Don't fret the $199 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All of the hardware can be had for well under $100

      Going by the prices you've quoted, the hardware (not counting the $2-$23 cd-roms) total comes to $91 (probably doesn't include S&H) which isn't by my definition "well under" $100 and it includes a used hard drive and a "cheap Taiwanese knockoff" keyboard.

    26. Re:Don't fret the $199 by Shadowcaster · · Score: 1
      XP will run on a shitload faster and more machines than Linux for the PS2.

      Okay. If you had said that aloud, I'd be forced to ask you what kind of drugs you've got and if you're sharing. They must be good. :) The way I translate that sentence, you first state that XP requires a much faster than average machine to run on.. ok, I agree entirely. Then you do a complete doubling-back upon that and say it runs on "more machines". Huh? Pick one, not both.

      I think what Sony is doing is great, don't get me wrong, but what the hell does XP have to do w/it?

      Not much, really, other than M$ makes that and a console system as well. For some inexplicable reason, certain people here think that *NIX, *BSD, etc, would be l33t on the XBox. It's just a damned computer with a raped BIOS and some hacked (tho not by MS!) hardware as far as I can tell.

      I can only run it on a PS2

      uhh... no shit? That's why they called it "Playstation 2 Linux".

      I need to get a ton of other hardware

      What, you'd prefer to do kernel hacking with the Dualshock controller? *snicker*

      and other than "dork value" even as an avid supporter of Linux I don't see the point.

      The point is basically to see it done. Perhaps you've seen that one Star Trek movie, where Kirk is climbing the rock.. when asked why he did it, "Because it's there!" was the response. Same deal, except no William Shatner. At least not that I'm aware of.. :)

    27. Re:Don't fret the $199 by fireboy1919 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Umm...they do provide all the hardware except the TV or monitor.

      It comes with a 40 GB hard drive, network card, 2 Linux DVDs, a VGA interface adapter, a mouse, and a keyboard. This is a competitive rate for all of this stuff. Plus, you have the guarantee of compatibility.

      What else were you planning on putting into your playstation? A floppy drive?

      This is a competitive product; most applications don't need a powerful processor, and it really is a full fledged computer which even has an edge for gaming with the built-in hardware. Is $300 too much to pay for a fully loaded computer?
      I gotta tell you, I'd never buy a playstation for just the games. But I'd buy one that I could use to run games AND a mature operating system.

      --
      Mod me down and I will become more powerful than you can possibly imagine!
    28. Re:Don't fret the $199 by The+Mgt · · Score: 1
      the GPL only requires I provide you with the source code.


      OK, does anyone have the source then ?
    29. Re:Don't fret the $199 by Scooby+Snacks · · Score: 1
      Got binaries? Source distribution is only required if you distribute the binaries, and only to those to whom you have distributed the binaries.

      Sony could charge US$5,000 for the software if they wanted to; there's still nothing in the GPL that requires they make it available for public download. All they have to do is to give away the source (or a written offer for the source at nominal cost) to those who purchase the product. Oh, and they can't restrict your ability to redistribute it, either.

      Don't believe me? Take a look for yourself.

      --

      --
      Runnin' around, robbin' banks all whacked on the Scooby Snacks...
    30. Re:Don't fret the $199 by Mister+Snee · · Score: 1

      I gotta tell you, I'd never buy a playstation for just the games. But I'd buy one that I could use to run games AND a mature operating system.

      Well, you do know what this means:
      Hunt! :D

    31. Re:Don't fret the $199 by byran+lei · · Score: 1

      >You fucking assholes will never be happy.
      >Some idiot gets Linux running in single user mode on some game
      >platform and you all cry hooray, but a company invests time and money
      >to do a proper job and all you do is complain about being fucking
      >gouged. Cry me a fucking river.
      >
      >
      Damn straight. I'ld rather spend $199 on this upgrade for my PS2 than spend the same $199 on shitty ports of shitty PC games I don't give a shit about. What the hell makes you think we should give a damn about the PC gaming market anyway?

    32. Re:Don't fret the $199 by byran+lei · · Score: 1

      >> All of the hardware can be had for well under $100
      >You do realize that your parts total up to $114, are all used or cheap
      >offbrands, and are still probably underpriced at that? Don't think
      >new, quality components would be around twice that?
      >
      >
      This guy most likely sells used computer parts as "new" to unsupecting ebay suckers....

    33. Re:Don't fret the $199 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As I have pointed out to posters long before time and then some more, and still do:

      READ THE FUCKING ARTICLE BEFORE YOU POST, BITCH.

    34. Re:Don't fret the $199 by darien · · Score: 1

      No William Shatner? Aw nuts. :(

      I was getting excited at the thought of a Beowulf cluster of William Shatners. Just imagine! Hook a couple of hundred of them together and you could get a throughput of thousands of alien babes per second.

    35. Re:Don't fret the $199 by Pinball+Wizard · · Score: 2

      Well, seeing as how I already hook my Playstation through my stereo, with this it can be an MP3 server/TIVO. I can network it with other computers that store music, video, etc. I can pause to check the rest of my network while I'm playing games or watching TV.

      I was planning on using a computer for DVD/MP3 playback anyway - this would just be cheaper and cooler than what I had planned for in the first place.

      If only the mouse and keyboard were wireless. Damn!

      --

      No, Thursday's out. How about never - is never good for you?

    36. Re:Don't fret the $199 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Those Aibo's may not throw well, but have you ever kicked one? Man, do they fly!

    37. Re:Don't fret the $199 by Guppy06 · · Score: 2

      "Where do you think this $199.00 really goes?
      "


      Um, gee, let me think... maybe perhaps to the 40 GB HDD, keyboard, VGA adapter and 100BaseTx NIC that comes with the software? Maybe just a little bit?

    38. Re:Don't fret the $199 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

      Hi... Someone with a clue here (NDA'd PS2 developer). Not only does Sony give out the source and all modifications for the toolchain, but they have the next version up in CVS on their support site for people to tinker with. Source is NOT provided for some original tools written by Sony that have no code in common with the toolchain, nor are they required to provide it.

      Your source doesn't sound very knowledgeable.

    39. Re:Don't fret the $199 by GTRacer · · Score: 2
      From AC:

      Playstation II: $90 ?
      Linux: $190 ?

      From fireboy1919:

      Is $300 too much to pay for a fully loaded computer?

      Methinks one or both of you is confusing the PS2 with the PSX's successor, the PSone. A New PS2 is still 300 bucks and used they're like $225. The Linux kit is still $200.

      The real beauty of this plan is that Sony has ALREADY sold a few million PS2's in North America alone (20 mil worldwide as of a couple months ago). They're still selling like crazy.

      For any mon-owner that balks at $500 for a Linux computer/game system/DVD player, there's a hundred or so owners who might consider ponying up 2 C-notes just to play around with something more enlightening than GTA3.

      Not that there's anything wrong with GTA3, mind you...

      GTRacer
      - Where do I send the preorder check?

      --
      Defending IP by destroying access to it? That makes sense, RIAA/MPAA. Go to the corner until you can play nice!
    40. Re:Don't fret the $199 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, $500 for a PS2 running Linux, or $500 for an XBox running....well... M$ crap. Personally, I'll be glad to spring for the Linux addon. I already have PS2, Dreamcast, GameCube, plus 6 old systems (NES, SNES, Genesis, PS1, N64, and the unholy Virtua Boy, AND a GBA). The PS2 addon just took priority on my list over getting an XBox any time soon.

    41. Re:Don't fret the $199 by filmcritic · · Score: 0

      yeah anyway...who enforces the GPL? I don't see anyone kicking down my door because of making burned copies of Mandrake W/O source...the GPL can go to hell..LOL that rhymed

    42. Re:Don't fret the $199 by SpinyNorman · · Score: 2

      OK, tell you what, why not take your $199 go buy your own hard disk, ethernet card, USB keyboard, USB mouse and VGA adaptor, then with all your spare change maybe you can hire someone to port XFree86 to the PS2 graphics chip, and someone else to assemble a GNU/linux distribution for you and burn it onto DVD. You did remember to add USB support to the 2.2 kernel didn't you?

      If I were a Sony marketing executive reading all this whining, I'd say next time let's just offer them the hardware for $199 and tell them to port Linux themselves.

    43. Re:Don't fret the $199 by jrockway · · Score: 2

      I have a [USB] wireless keyboard (and optical mouse) from Logitech that works fine with the PS2. All USB mice/keyboards are the same as far as the driver is concerned.

      --
      My other car is first.
    44. Re:Don't fret the $199 by uninet · · Score: 0

      Your comments make sense, but let's think in new retail product terms:

      -VGA Monitor cable from Sony - $30
      -Decent USB Keyboard - $25
      -Linux Distro with 2 DVD's - $60
      -PS2 Network Adapter - $50 (I bet it will sell for more, actually).
      -40 Gig Harddisk - $100

      $30+$25+$60+$50+$100=$265. Now, you don't really expect Sony to sell *new* products for the same price as *used* stuff on eBay do you? Also, when you figure that if I want SuSE Linux Pro or MDK Linux ProPack (the two distros that come on DVD's) I'm looking at between $50-$140 depending on what type of deal I get.
      Also you talk about a used 20 gig hard disk, this is a new 40 gig hard disk, that comes in a nice little case to make it easier to slip in and install. Finally, Sony has been working on this thing for over a year now, and they probably won't sell more than ten or twenty thousand of them, so going by the profit margins a company the size of Sony is use to, this thing isn't worth it at all(*).
      I'm just glad they are interested in Linux...

      -Tim

      ---
      (*) Yes I know that they loose money on every PS2, but think how much they make off software. I certainly don't see them making "software money" off the PS2 Linux Kit, do you?

      --
      -------------
      "You would not get a high grade for such a design" -- Andy Tanenbaum on Linus' Linux design.
    45. Re:Don't fret the $199 by uninet · · Score: 0

      Oh, and lest I forget to mention it also comes with the PS2 Runtime and documentation, stuff that Sony probably charges more than $200 for alone.

      -Tim

      --
      -------------
      "You would not get a high grade for such a design" -- Andy Tanenbaum on Linus' Linux design.
    46. Re:Don't fret the $199 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Phuck you Tim and the horse you rode in on.

    47. Re:Don't fret the $199 by uninet · · Score: 0

      Care to explain why? What'd I do? Oh, and I don't ride horses - I ride penguins.

      --
      -------------
      "You would not get a high grade for such a design" -- Andy Tanenbaum on Linus' Linux design.
    48. Re:Don't fret the $199 by joshsisk · · Score: 1

      What makes you think he was talking about the PC gaming market anyway?

    49. Re:Don't fret the $199 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Holy mackerel, I won't even go there.

      I mean, that's what they have animal rights for.

      You're giving Linux geeks a bad name.

    50. Re:Don't fret the $199 by magister707 · · Score: 0

      your confused.

      what about his confused?

    51. Re:Don't fret the $199 by uninet · · Score: 0

      Please do, if you *really* have a problem with something I said, feel free to let me know. I see nothing wrong with my statement - it is reasonable from both an Free Software and Commercial standpoint.

      Honestly the only problem I can see anyone having with it is the fact that I argue that there is nothing wrong with Sony charging a bit *less* than market value for all of the components. Something that reasonable "Linux geeks" should appreciate.

      -Tim

      --
      -------------
      "You would not get a high grade for such a design" -- Andy Tanenbaum on Linus' Linux design.
    52. Re:Don't fret the $199 by LoseNotLooseGuy · · Score: 1

      Yes I know that they loose money on every PS2

      While it is true that Sony "lets loose or releases" money on every PS2, in the sense that they sell the machine for less money than it costs to manufacture, I suspect that this was not exactly your intended meaning. The word you were looking for was lose.

      Congratulations! You have been participant #13 in my campaign to rid Slashdot of this error.

      --
      Proudly correcting Slashdot's most irritating linguistic error since 2002.
    53. Re:Don't fret the $199 by uninet · · Score: 0

      Hehehe, thanks Mr. LoseNotLooseGuy. I should be much more careful with my spelling. :-)

      -Tim

      --
      -------------
      "You would not get a high grade for such a design" -- Andy Tanenbaum on Linus' Linux design.
    54. Re:Don't fret the $199 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      sonys part of riaa? i know thier film division is with mpaa...

      anyway, the way your going at it, you can build a decent system for free with a little luck around the right dumpsters. ebay doesnt really count for the mass market (which yes, i know we are not) so perhaps they should also off just a CD.

    55. Re:Don't fret the $199 by LoseNotLooseGuy · · Score: 1

      Very well uninet, you are forgiven. Now go forth and err no more, lest you once again incur the wrath of LoseNotLooseGuy!

      --
      Proudly correcting Slashdot's most irritating linguistic error since 2002.
    56. Re:Don't fret the $199 by uninet · · Score: 0

      Ahhhhhhh! Please, you are giving me nightmares! Please find a different victim! I will reform my typographical ways! ;-)

      --
      -------------
      "You would not get a high grade for such a design" -- Andy Tanenbaum on Linus' Linux design.
    57. Re:Don't fret the $199 by aka-ed · · Score: 1
      Kirk is climbing the rock.. when asked why he did it, "Because it's there!"

      Then there's that Gilligan's Island episode, where the Skipper said, "To be or not to be..."

      Everest. George Mallory. Look it up.

      --
      I survived the Dick Cheney Presidency 7 to 9 AM 7-21-07
    58. Re:Don't fret the $199 by Shadowcaster · · Score: 1
      Then there's that Gilligan's Island episode, where the Skipper said, "To be or not to be..."

      Gee, and I thought I might bring a bit more humor to the post. How silly of me. :P

      Humor. English dictionary. Look it up.

    59. Re:Don't fret the $199 by tutal · · Score: 1

      I have been corrected, no Linux is not free as in beer, however, I still stand that beer is an inalienable right for all free people no matter what race, creed, age (well, except for those of you under 21 in the US sorry kiddies). Nonetheless, any GPL software can be sold as is. This is my freedom to distribute under the GPL. If I can find a sucker to pay $100 for Slackware, as long as I provide the source and give credit, I'm in no way violating the GPL... at least I think. Anyhow, I'm off in search of free beer and pursuing the freedoms which every man or woman should hold dear. Goodnight!

    60. Re:Don't fret the $199 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "What the hell makes you think we should give a damn about the PC gaming market anyway?"

      Counterstrike. "The real reason not to buy a mac"

    61. Re:Don't fret the $199 by aka-ed · · Score: 1
      Do you suppose most people familiar with the Everest quote recall Mallory's name? If you think so, you're wrong. I've seen it attributed to Sir Edmond Hillary often enough by those you'd expect to know better. Pardon me for assuming you were among the class of people who should know better.

      --
      I survived the Dick Cheney Presidency 7 to 9 AM 7-21-07
  9. here is a good question... by AnimeFreak · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Considering there is a hard disk and a operation system that is developed by "hackers," what is stopping someone from creating a bootloader for Linux to boot PS2/PSX burns (let it be a DVD-R/CDR).

    I don't see why it would not be possible to do so unless they have really done a good job putting protections into place.

    1. Re:here is a good question... by datm · · Score: 0

      Just wondering? Doesn't it also provide that you provide a freely downloadable version. I think what they are charging for is the hardware. Although I'd like to say what they are OVER charging for.

      --
      Datm
    2. Re:here is a good question... by jonelf · · Score: 1

      The PS2 simply will not play CD-RWs. It's not in the software so a bootloader will not help.

      http://ps2dev.livemedia.com.au/kb.asp?T=1

      --
      /J - to know recursion you must first know recursion
    3. Re:here is a good question... by Mister+Snee · · Score: 1

      So plug a USB CD-R in with the handy-dandy USB support Sony has kindly hacked into the 2.2.1 kernel, throw in your favourite burn (the one the PS2's "native" DVD-ROM refuses to read), fire up Theoretical Bootloader and you're in pirate-land. ^-^

    4. Re:here is a good question... by AnimeFreak · · Score: 2

      I am talking CD-Rs here.

    5. Re:here is a good question... by c4tp · · Score: 1

      Oh yes. This is a good day to have a USB CDRW drive. With the new kernal, it will work and I will have not just a CD drive, but CDR and RW. The others all laughed at me, but who's laughing now? (Hint: It's me)

    6. Re:here is a good question... by Jayzz · · Score: 1

      I think PS 2 has a firewire (i-Link) port too. Current kernel may not have support for firewire. But it's still possible to add it. So you may not be the one who laughs at the end. :)

    7. Re:here is a good question... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's not a good idea. If us linux people abuse the wonderful resource that Sony just gave us, this will be the last time Linux ever shows up on a Playstation.

      It's the old, time-tested rule: Abuse it and lose it.

    8. Re:here is a good question... by detritus. · · Score: 2

      Considering there is a hard disk and a operation system that is developed by "hackers," what is stopping someone from creating a bootloader for Linux to boot PS2/PSX burns (let it be a DVD-R/CDR).

      You're right, it does open up alot of doors for exploitation in one form or another.

      However, I will personally refuse to use anything made with the Linux kit to crack the PS2.

      I have gained a tremendous amount of respect for Sony since the release of the PS2. They could have easily made people go out and buy a 50 dollar accessory so people could play their old PSX games on the PS2. There are many avenues they could have taken to be the traditional proprietary, corporate asses who will find a way to get into the consumer's wallet any way they can.

      Sure, not all of Sony is perfect, but they are taking a revolutionary step and a possible risk that is not like a corporate giant. For that reason alone, I would surely hope the people who make use of this kit do so in the best interest of keeping a strong relationship between sony and the geek world.

    9. Re:here is a good question... by jonelf · · Score: 1

      I don't see the difference. The moment you switch from you Linux boot CD to the burned CDR the internal copy protection will check the CD you insert and will refuse to read it if it's not a PS2/PSX/DVD. A bootloader will not help.

      --
      /J - to know recursion you must first know recursion
  10. The Entertainment Lifestyle by SkulkCU · · Score: 3, Insightful


    Sony Computer Entertainment America Inc. continues to redefine the entertainment lifestyle

    I was actually excited about this neat-o deal until I read this phrase. Doesn't it seem a bit silly to praise and promote a life filled with entertainment? Or am I being a joykill?

    On the other hand, if entertainment is being redefined as Linux hacking, maybe there's a great deal more progress being made than I realized...

    --
    .sig last updated Jan. 14, 2000
    1. Re:The Entertainment Lifestyle by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Their target market lives with their parents. What's the nicest word you can use to describe it when their target age isn't necessarily under 20.

    2. Re:The Entertainment Lifestyle by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      no, you're not being a joykill. you're being a killjoy.

    3. Re:The Entertainment Lifestyle by easter1916 · · Score: 1

      What's wrong with a life filled with entertainment? Are you jealous because you can't afford to have one, or are you some sort of religious right-winger who equates hard work with God and value?

    4. Re:The Entertainment Lifestyle by pyrrho · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Imagine that the world found cheap energy. Really cheap, if not zero point energy something like being able to burn saltwater in an engine.

      The economy of the world would likely become a luxery economy, probably an entertainment economy.

      But don't think that means hollywood! Think Hobbies... people only want that escapist crap because they have to do things they despise to make a living. Entertainment Economy would include things like linux hacking.

      Ok, so this opinion of mine is utopian crap. Sue me.

      --

      -pyrrho

  11. definitely buying one of these by Sparr0 · · Score: 0, Troll

    well, would be if i hadnt sold my PS2 already.

  12. "free as in GPL"? by VValdo · · Score: 2

    All of the hardware can be had for well under $100, and the software is Free as in GPL and can't legally be sold at a profit.

    Huh? Why not?
    W

    --
    -------------------
    This is my SIG. There are many like it, but this one is mine.
  13. Hardware included... by CMiYC · · Score: 2

    So if it includes the Hard Drive and Ethernet adapter, does this mean those are going to be available in May instead of this summer? That's kind of exciting....

    I'm not sure what Sony planned on selling the drive for, but I think the Network Adapter (which was suppose to be modem and ethernet) was going to go for around $40. Anyone know what the hard drive was going to sell for?

    I'm wondering what the value-add price of Linux is in this case.

    1. Re:Hardware included... by zeno_2 · · Score: 1

      Im also wondering if this hard drive and network adapter is going to be the 'same' as the one sony was going to release by itself. (e.g. Sometime when they come out with a hard drive for ps2, and I can lets say, install some game files to the drive to speed up loading, I wonder if this hard drive will serve the same purpose).

      There's already a game out that supports networking, Tony Hawk 3, and they just have drivers built into the game that supports a lot of the USB Networking gizmo's you can get out there.. Ah well we will have to see, im definately getting one though.. =)

  14. Indrema by that_guy · · Score: 1

    After you fork out the $199 for the linux kit you can install all the old code for Indrema and start porting all the cool games to your new free software (500 dollar system)

    --

    Driving backwards on the highway of life
  15. Re:First freeloader post by questforme · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Looks like most(if not all) of the $199 goes to additional hardware and documentation, nothing unusual about that...

  16. why run bleem? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Bleem is a playstation 1 emulator, and the ps2 already plays ps1 games.

    Getting MAME to run on the ps2 would be pretty hilarious.

    ac23

  17. MAME support now possible ? by indaba · · Score: 2, Interesting
    I really hope that this now make MAME support possible.

    A MAME DVD would have enough space on it for all the most popular MAME's game ROMS

    BUT, would Sony allow such a distribution ???

    Checkout MAME here : http://www.mame.net
    And for all your ROM needs here : http://www.mame.dk

    Galaga,Outrun,Spy Hunter,Xevious,Rolling Thunder - ahh !! my childhood !

    Darren Kruse CCNP CCDP
    WAN/LAN Networking Consultant
    mailto://darren_kruse@hotmail.com
    www.geocities.com/darren_kruse

    1. Re:MAME support now possible ? by TitaniumFox · · Score: 1

      With the 40GB HD and the ethernet, wouldn't it be a small matter to get your PS2 on your home LAN and simply copy MAME and the ROMS over to the PS2's HD and run it from there? I see the convenience of having a MAME DVD -a one-stop old school solution for your console for the people with no LAN. Getting into a MAME distro with the ROMS included would most likely get into some sort of legal tar pit because of the whole "don't run this rom unless you own the firmware" deal that goes along with it.

      --
      -- I'd say your post was about 3 monkeys, 18 minutes.
    2. Re:MAME support now possible ? by innocent_white_lamb · · Score: 2

      The Mame license prohibits distribution of Mame on the same physical media as ROMS. Note the following quote from the Mame license:

      "You are not allowed to distribute MAME and ROM images on the same physical
      medium. You are allowed to make them available for download on the same
      website, but only if you warn users about the copyright status of the ROMs and
      the legal issues involved. You are NOT allowed to make MAME available for
      download together with one giant, single file containing all the supported
      ROMs, or any files containing more than one ROM set each. You are not allowed
      to distribute MAME in any form if you sell, advertise, or publicize illegal
      CD-ROMs or other media containing ROM images. Note that this restriction
      applies even if you don't directly make money from such a sale. The restriction
      does not apply, of course, if the CD-ROMs are published by the ROMs' copyright
      owners.


      Of course, if you could burn your own DVD for your own personal use....

      --
      If you're a zombie and you know it, bite your friend!
    3. Re:MAME support now possible ? by dimator · · Score: 2

      Of course, if you could burn your own DVD for your own personal use....

      If you mean a ps2 bootable dvd, I don't that's going to happen, not only due to technical reasons but also legal reasons. Now on the other hand, if you could store your ROMS on your computer and rig up some bits to list/fetch them via the network adaptor... The same could be done for a NES/SNES emulator/ROMS!!

      Oh god, I have to go masturbate.

      --
      python -c "x='python -c %sx=%s; print x%%(chr(34),repr(x),chr(34))%s'; print x%(chr(34),repr(x),chr(34))"
  18. Re: not really, its old. by CMiYC · · Score: 2

    In the past, you had to have the development system to use the programs wrote by others. So you'd have to shell out the money for a development system just to play your pirated games. In the case of the PSX that was cost and unit prohibitive. There weren't enough units and they cost way to much to justify that.

    In this case, though, some people may be more keen to paying $200 and pirate 50 games (of which, they'll play 4. Good thing they are saving money.).

    It boils down to, even if you did come up with a bootloader, only those with a development system would benefit from it. If I had one of the development systems, I wouldn't be interested anyway. If a game is worth playing, I'll buy it.

  19. few questions? by vukv · · Score: 1

    Is that hard drive going to be used only for linux? can we save games to it?

    While it sounds very cool, it is way too expensive - you can get 40 GB hard drive for 67$ in retail, NIC for 10$ in retail and all those other adapters and perhipals for 40$..in retail... so their hardware cost like 60$ max...

    But, I guess they do have to pay for development costs (???) and make some money on small amount of users... another major drawback is that you have to use it on your computer screen... now, do you really want to drag your playstation to your computer all the time? whats the point?

    However, cool thing would be if we get some hacks and mods that let us use wireless nics and bigger hd's and normal tv's.... take that webtv!

    1. Re:few questions? by kilgore_47 · · Score: 1

      you can get 40 GB hard drive for 67$ in retail, NIC for 10$ in retail and all those other adapters and perhipals for 40$..in retail... so their hardware cost like 60$ max...

      67+10+40 != 60

      --
      ___
      The way to see by faith is to shut the eye of reason. --Ben Franklin
    2. Re:few questions? by jqcoffey · · Score: 1

      um, dude how does 67 + 40 + 10 = 60? I know my math is a bit rusty, but I get $117 everytime (and so does xcalc).

    3. Re:few questions? by wadetemp · · Score: 2

      He was quoting retail prices for those items, and estimating that $117 retail is $60 actual cost. I think that's pretty close. So they're charging you approx $140 for Linux... Windows upgrades are cheaper than that. :)

    4. Re:few questions? by toriver · · Score: 1
      While it sounds very cool, it is way too expensive - you can get 40 GB hard drive for 67$ in retail, NIC for 10$ in retail and all those other adapters and perhipals for 40$..in retail... so their hardware cost like 60$ max...

      Apart from your math skills, I think you're ignoring that the PS2 is not a PC cabinet. So you need a disk cabinet, connectors for either USB or i.Link, etc. etc...

      I strongly doubt you can purchase a stock $67 IDE drive and make the PS2 see it in any way.

    5. Re:few questions? by caferace · · Score: 1
      While it sounds very cool, it is way too expensive - you can get 40 GB hard drive for 67$ in retail, NIC for 10$ in retail and all those other adapters and perhipals for 40$..in retail... so their hardware cost like 60$ max...

      I'm guessing you're translating to Canadian dollars?

      On a more serious note, this could be the opportunity for the walk to battle Microsoft with the "Playstation ThreeVo". After licensing TiVo's codebase (including source) and having Linux running on the box, plus a buttload of developers they aren't that far away from a PVR that could rival the XBox "home device".

    6. Re:few questions? by vukv · · Score: 1

      that would be cool (tivo) - however, how can tivo record while you are playing PS2? oops ;-)

      ... notice how I am reffering to retail prices... SONY purchases their hard drives in quantities of hundreds of thousands.. I am pretty sure they get some kind of discount ;-)

    7. Re:few questions? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm guessing you're translating to Canadian dollars?
      Can't be. It would be more like $300 (CAD)!

    8. Re:few questions? by vukv · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Actually, I have to apologize for my price misunderstanding... I thought it will be 199$, however it seems as if it is going to sell for 299$ in USA.

      Reuters article on News.com http://news.com.com/2100-1040-825762.html

      As to comment on pricing, sony purchases in huge quantities for their computers as it is... those prices are significantly lower than what we pay in retail... how else would xbox cost $300-$320 to produce? If 199$ (or 299$) is right for sony addon, then XBOX should cost 799$ by any means since it has much more hardware in it...
      (keep in mind that I dont own XBOX or plan to own one)

      I understand this is /., and that everything with the name linux in it is extremly usable and cool, but still.... its over priced, it doesnt work on TV's...it is unclear if it will work as upcoming Net & hardrive pack as well... too many unclears in order to call it a good value for 299 (or 199 for that matter).

    9. Re:few questions? by Mister+Snee · · Score: 1

      Is that hard drive going to be used only for linux? can we save games to it?

      I have no idea what kind of native support the PS2 has for saving games to a hard drive, but it's a pretty sure thing that once you install Linux on it it'll be right out -- none of the games you own have any idea how to write to an EXT2 filesystem. Any hard drive-save support would be highly proprietary. Now, as to whether it could be achieved with some partition magic... that's food for thought.

    10. Re:few questions? by vukv · · Score: 1

      right, so when their net & hard drive pack comes out, PS2 users will have to buy that one as well in order to save games to HD and play PS2 online?

      get my point now? 299$ + 299$ + ....

    11. Re:few questions? by filmcritic · · Score: 0

      I doubt very highly you'll be able to save games to the HD. They'll make you pay another $100 or so when they come out with the "real" HD to save games. So, if you buy this ridiculous kit, you would spend $299 for the PS2 and $199 for the linux kit, for a total of almost $500. Then, if you add in the probable cost of the add-on hard drive to save games to and a NIC, you'd be better off buying a PC. Now really, how many people will really want to sit in front of the TV typing away instead of playing games?? They should fire the ass who came up with this idea.

    12. Re:few questions? by byran+lei · · Score: 1

      >I doubt very highly you'll be able to save games to the HD. They'll
      >make you pay another $100 or so when they come out with the "real" HD
      >to save games.
      >
      >
      Or Sony (or someone else) will come up with software that'll let users partition the 40 gig hardrive. "Partition the Hardrive", you ask? "What do you mean by that?" Not a surprising question coming from a Windows user like youself.

    13. Re:few questions? by filmcritic · · Score: 0

      And what will you do with your neatly formatted EXT3 filesystem on your 40 gig drive? Play tux racer I'd imagine. Oh that's right you don't play games on Linux...You have a real attitude problem little boy and someday you'll grow up to see it's a Windows world out there.

      PS - PC games aren't going anywhere...have you seen the sales figures lately? I'm sorry, Lynx probably don't display the page correctly because it's a text browser...so you probably didn't.

  20. Re:ps2 by CMiYC · · Score: 4, Funny

    So I can write a program that flashes the analog light on the controller in morse code.

  21. Nethack by alister · · Score: 5, Funny

    This will only be of value if I can compile Nethack for PS2. This would have to be the only game to take full advantage of the PS2's graphics :-)

    Alister

    1. Re:Nethack by Jagasian · · Score: 2

      Yeah, and Mame (Arcade Emulator), zSNES (Super Nintendo Emulator), FCE Ultra (Nintendo Entertainment System Emulator and the best one that that), etc...

  22. Why can't it be sold at a profit? by McNally · · Score: 1
    All of the hardware can be had for well under $100, and the software is Free as in GPL and can't legally be sold at a profit.


    People sure seem to have some funny ideas about what the free software licenses allow and prohibit. Perhaps"Mr. Uptime" is mistaken or maybe I simply don't understand, but one of us seems to be wildly mistaken about what the GPL actually says.

    Why can't the software be sold at a profit? As far as I'm aware, the GPL doesn't prevent you from selling GPL'ed software for any price you and a buyer can agree upon. According to my understanding, the GPL mainly (a) prevents you from prohibiting recipients from redistributing the software themselves, and (b) requires that if you distribute GPL'ed software or derivative works you make source code available for free. Neither of those requirements is necessarily incompatible with for-profit sales.
  23. Re:First Post? and Why would you want PS2 Linux by pauldy · · Score: 1

    If you read the article it clearly states it comes with a 40 GB hard drive. I'm guessing you didn't. So you would have also missed the part about a USB keyboard and mouse and the whole monitor adaptor thing aming your PS/2 a fully functional linux workstation.

  24. will this help me with final fantasy x? by frankmu · · Score: 1

    will this help me with final fantasy X? it would be a great way to put on the ol' business expense account. "yeah, right, i needed the playstation because it runs linux. yeah."

    i'll see if my wife will buy that argument, and let me buy it!

    --
    Supreme executive power derives from a mandate from the masses, not from some farcical aquatic ceremony.
    1. Re:will this help me with final fantasy x? by Vardamir · · Score: 1

      Actually, you will now be able to hexedit your saved game files.

  25. OSS... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    is for whiny, liberal faggots! Bunch of fucking Socialists!

    1. Re:OSS... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, I thought RMS is.

  26. My mother always said... by dupper · · Score: 1, Troll
    ...if you don't have anything nice to say, don't say anything at all. Then, we both broke into hysterical laughter. Thus, I submit that this is a horrible waste of both Sony and end-user time and resources. What can you do on a game console that you can't do on a formal PC? The only value that I can see in this is an ego boost for a pretentious, arrogant (likely wannabe-)geek, who wants to d3m0n57r4t3 h15 1337 h4x0r 5k1115.

    This is NOT a Troll post or Flamebait, it is simply my opinion. If you disagree, I welcome a response.

    1. Re:My mother always said... by jqcoffey · · Score: 1

      personally, I see value in the ability to have a pretty top notch gaming system, that can run Linux to do various Internet related tasks, as well as perhaps code on a bit that compliments my laptop... especially for the paltry $500. Think about it a top of the line GeForce 3 will cost you $300 by itself, and all you can do is stare at it.

    2. Re:My mother always said... by kilgore_47 · · Score: 1

      The kit includes a a NIC. A ps2 running linux can play videos and mp3s downloaded off the internet. For those of us who already have a ps2, and who would like a set top mp3 player that can pull stuff from a samba share in the other room, this is not a waste of time at all. (and thats just one use for it, there are countless others)

      --
      ___
      The way to see by faith is to shut the eye of reason. --Ben Franklin
    3. Re:My mother always said... by cow-orker · · Score: 3, Insightful

      What can you do on a game console that you can't do on a formal PC?

      You can code for fun. Coding on an PC has become boring. The machine ist not interesting, you have to take care to be "compatible" with all sorts of crap hardware, etc. Game consoles are interesting: powerful small processors, where coding in assembly pays, interesting graphics hardware where you can do cool effects with skill istead of brute force. It's fun.

      That said, I doubt, Sony will ever release information about the interesting bits. The vector processors of the emotion engine are top secret, and so ist the graphics processor. That makes it kind of pointless.

    4. Re:My mother always said... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I disagree. As a server, or even desktop platform it probably isn't the greatest. However the press release stated that they are releasing the system manuals and the VU microassemblers (The VU units, for anyne not familiar with PS2 hardware, are 128 bit parallel processors used for geometry transforms. They can perform 4 simultaneous multiplies on 32 bit values. This allows for very fast matrix calculations).

      It seems to me that like the NetYaroze for the ps1, that this is a tool for ameteur game developers to get their hands on the ps2 hardware (The official development environment for the PS2 is hosted in linux as it is).

      SDo as a desktop or server.. yea this sucks.. as a game development platform.. it's the closest to current generation console development as meany people are going to get.

    5. Re:My mother always said... by Phil+Wilkins · · Score: 1

      > The vector processors of the emotion engine are top secret, and so ist the graphics processor.

      No they're not, they're fully documented. The only undocumented area is the IOP, which controls all external IO. Even fully licensed developers only get library docs for that sucker.

    6. Re:My mother always said... by dupper · · Score: 1

      TROLL?! Apparently there's a moderator out there who doesn't like to read the full post. I'm sure you all know by now how the way to the troll post investigation. Thank you for your time.

    7. Re:My mother always said... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      'Coding on an PC has become boring'

      coding on a PC has never been more interesting you have pixel and vertex shaders now that make things look bloody excellent and the power your dealing with is enough to create emense immersive worlds far beyond that of the Gay Station 2.

      'take care to be "compatible" with all sorts of crap hardware'

      Can you say 'Direct X' or 'Open GL' write a game in either of these superb API's and itll run on pretty much any machine with a graphics card.

      'where you can do cool effects with skill istead of brute force'

      Do you have any idea why PC games require the emmensly powerful systems they do? Its because making skillfull optimised code is incredibly tedious and hard. It is far from 'fun'. Your statement works from a spectrum or Amiga point of view because they used programming tools like AMOS and BASIC which had to be skillfully programmed or your game wouldnt only look bad it would be crap to play as well. The playstation 2 is using similar tools to any other game that is made today (e.g. C) as a result you have to do a lot more on PS2 to get the same results as PC there is no other difference its just harder.

  27. Hmmm... by BJH · · Score: 3, Funny

    It looks like Linux (for PlayStation 2) may be a really popular item (for PlayStation 2), especially if Sony (for PlayStation 2) is releasing (for PlayStation 2) this into mainstream (for PlayStation 2) retail (for PlayStation 2) outlets (for PlayStation 2).

    Just remember, it's for PlayStation (for Play(for PlayStat(for PlayStation 2)ion 2)Station 2) 2!

    1. Re:Hmmm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That last sentance is giving me Scheme flashbacks. Please stop it.

    2. Re:Hmmm... by BJH · · Score: 2, Funny

      (define ps2
      (lambda (phrase)
      (cond
      ((null? phrase) (quote ()))
      (else (cons phrase (for PlayStation 2)))))


      Sorry, I couldn't resist ;)

  28. Sony maintains control � no ad-hoc DVD authoring by indaba · · Score: 4, Informative
    You'll notice that there's still no way for anyone to author a DVD and distribute it without the blessing of Sony.

    With my end-user hat on , I think this is a good thing, as I know that all commercial PS2 bootable DVD will have at least some sort of minimum quality control

    With my hacker/geek hat on, I'm kinda disappointed that this won't allow non Sony sanctioned s/w to be produced for the PS2

    I'm not sure which way to lean on this one, so it's just an observation at this stage !

    Darren Kruse CCNP CCDP
    WAN/LAN Networking Consultant
    mailto://darren_kruse@hotmail.com
    www.geocities.com/darren_kruse

  29. Re:ps2 by Jucius+Maximus · · Score: 1
    "Why do we want this again?"

    So we can play tuxracer on the big screen TV, duh. ;-P

    It's not like everyone is wealthy enough to have a 3D accellerator card let alone a TV-out on our machines! This $199 pricetag is less than the 2 of those combined, assuming you're into quality hardware.

    Note to moderators: this is a joke.

  30. vga adapter by swankypimp · · Score: 1

    It seems to me that the PS2-to-monitor adapter is a worthless throw-in. The primary advantage to running Linux on the PS2 is the ability to use your n inch big screen TV for DVDs, life-sized Quake and 'Net pr0n, etc. I have tried various adapters to use my comp on my TV and they all fellate fuzzy hamster testes, more or less (in addition to a few Nvidia cards with video out, my dad let me borrow a relatively expensive scan convertor he uses for Power Point presentations (he's a professor)). While DVDs are definitely sharper on my monitor than on my TV, I'd rather take a slight loss of quality lying comfortably on the couch over sitting bolt upright in a desk chair squinting at my monitor from ten centimeters away. Ditto for games that use a joypad instead of a keyboard.

    --

    --All your stolen base are belong to Rickey Henderson
    1. Re:vga adapter by zeno_2 · · Score: 1

      Im kinda the other way around, theres a few games that I would love to see how they looked on a monitor, but trying to get a vga adapter for something as common as rca jacks is tough to find. I ordered one from z64.com, but when the order didn't get here, I called them up, and it sounded like the guy's wife answered, and she told me to callback in 10min heh.

      From what I have read though, its setup to run at 1024x768, so it said that a monitor was required, and you could not run it on a tv.

  31. Re:ps2 by garcia · · Score: 2

    maybe just disable the god damn button altogether for those of us that don't want to have it bumped during those insane times when I bash the analog sticks against my forehead.

    And I wonder why people ask if I have a "large" zit problem.

    Seriously that button always gets turned on and next thing I know the fucking Detriot Lions sack Warner. Umm, no.

  32. in practice wont be sold at a profit. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "the software is Free as in GPL and can't legally be sold at a profit."

    Everyone is ju,ping to say that it can be sold at a profit, the point is irrelevant.

    Its free as in speech, so anyone who tries to sell free software at a large profit will probably only sell 1 copy.

  33. i had the wrong impression before reading ... by wtmcgee · · Score: 1

    ..the article. the computer monitor adapter threw me off guard, along with some of the other accessories and such that come along with it. $199 is a bit pricey, but i may still pick it up. like everyone else has said - a 40gb HDD, usb keyboard/mouse, network card and so much more... not a bad deal really.

    --
    *** For a better tommorow, change your life today ***
  34. Benchmarks? by SirDrinksAlot · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Has anyone ran linux on a PS2 run any Benchmarks yet? I'd like to know just how fast the CPU really is.

    1. Re:Benchmarks? by byran+lei · · Score: 1

      >Has anyone ran linux on a PS2 run any Benchmarks yet? I'd like to know
      >just how fast the CPU really is.
      >
      >
      >
      Why bother? PC-based/style benchmarks are totally meaningless when dealing with dealing a platform that's not based on PC design like the PS2 is.

    2. Re:Benchmarks? by jcupitt65 · · Score: 1

      Pretty slow in PC terms ... I saw it compared to a PII 266 (sorry, lost the link).

      It only gets quick when you start doing asm and working those vector units.

  35. Windows games on PlayStation then? by prototype · · Score: 1

    Hmmm... maybe the PlayStation will have enough horsepower to drive VMWare running under Linux with a guest operating system of Windows 98. Now all those Windows games will be available on the PlayStation? Well, we can dream can't we?

    liB

    1. Re:Windows games on PlayStation then? by Zenki · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yeah. Considering Playstation 2 is MIPS based.

    2. Re:Windows games on PlayStation then? by seann · · Score: 1

      correct me if I'm stupid but, can not vmware only run on intel 386 based platforms?

      --
      I'm a big retard who forgot to log out of Slashdot on Mike's computer! LOOK AT ME.
    3. Re:Windows games on PlayStation then? by vrmlknight · · Score: 1

      And the PowerPC and G4 chips, they do have a Mac version, last time i checks macs don't use x86 correct me if i'm stupid, maybe they will code it for PS2...

      --
      This must be Thursday, I never could get the hang of Thursdays.
    4. Re:Windows games on PlayStation then? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      correct me if im stupid but it also runs on 486, 586, 686 and i belive in the works for a 786

    5. Re:Windows games on PlayStation then? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      maybe he's got the source code. He can jsut compile it under native C and voila!
      (uh that's a joke)

    6. Re:Windows games on PlayStation then? by bojolais · · Score: 1

      As other replies to this hinted at... VMWare doesn't emulate the processor, only certain other parts of machine hardware. It's a real virtual machine environment, and code runs directly on the system CPU...

      Running VMWare on an XBox would be a different issue, since its processor is i386. PS2 would need full emulation, however... something akin to SoftPC for Macintosh.

  36. Re:Sony maintains control � no ad-hoc DVD authorin by zeno_2 · · Score: 1
    With my hacker/geek hat on, I'm kinda disappointed that this won't allow non Sony sanctioned s/w to be produced for the PS2

    When you say 'this' I would assume your talking about the linux kit.. why would 'that' not allow non-sony sanctioned (as you put it) software to be made for ps2? The linux kit does come with a hard drive, so theoretically I could create software on my own and save it on my ps2, without any say from sony whatsoever. In fact, I would say this linux kit 'helps' people create software on the playstation 2.. I think its their point =)

  37. PS2-linux URL by gkbarr · · Score: 3, Interesting
    playstation2-linux.com

    For those who are interested, this is the place to go. Every 'community' like /. stated as one or two guys with an idea...

    In other words, the site is kinda small right now.

    It helps if you, like, smoke a lot of weed.

    --
    Sapere Aude - Homer
    1. Re:PS2-linux URL by monkeymanjack · · Score: 0

      Yeah, one or two guys with an idea.. and a monthly paycheck from Sony. Not that I mind that. If a community forms around it, I guess that's the important part.

  38. Wha? XF86 3.3.6? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Were they afraid we might try to render something on it? I hope someone figures out how to load their own stuff on it. I seem to remember Sony locking a few things out so you can't access the GS directly and such.

  39. Where can you find the hacked Debian ? by twilight30 · · Score: 2
    Has anyone any more details on this one? Which port (not familiar with the PS2 arch myself) is this?

    Just wondering...

    --
    ========================================
    Death will come, and will have your eyes
    -- Pavese
    1. Re:Where can you find the hacked Debian ? by HeUnique · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Why the fucking hell do you think that a hacked debian version would be any helpful to you?

      Sony did LOTS of work on this port - I can hardly belive that you'll get same acceleration of graphics from some 'hacked up' debian distro - not mentioning optimized binaries, heavily modified kernel with USB support (can you compare kernel 2.2.1 USB support to what Sony added there? I doubt)...

      Oh, and for $199 you're getting TWO DVD's - one with the source and one is full Linux, which is ... ehm... a bit more then a "hacked up" version...

      Either quit bitching and hack for yourself or go buy it - $199 is not that much for a lot of work they did, plus they give kinda nice hardware...

      --
      Hetz (Heunique)
    2. Re:Where can you find the hacked Debian ? by hacker · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Either quit bitching and hack for yourself or go buy it - $199 is not that much for a lot of work they did, plus they give kinda nice hardware...

      You're absolutely right. Let's start funding and supporting the biggest supporter of the RIAA and the leading pioneer in the music copy-protection scheme. After all, it's only $199.00, right?

    3. Re:Where can you find the hacked Debian ? by zeno_2 · · Score: 1

      Why stop there, your using money, which will at some point end up in the RIAA's hands, no matter what you do about it, so lets just go to a barter system and get it all over with.

      Or you could just stop being paranoid about everything. The only people interested in this are those who have already given sony 300 bucks, so that select group of people really shouldn't have any qualms about supporting sony..

  40. Re:Sony maintains control � no ad-hoc DVD authorin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    i know the slash crowd isn't usually the biggest apple crowd , but my new apple has a dvd-r burner ,i'm sure if i spent enough time figuring out the way a ps2 boots something could be done

  41. Dealer recommendation by Roger+Watson · · Score: 1, Offtopic
    I recently purchased a PS2 mod chip (with DVD+RW support!) from tacoinspector.com. They seemed to have a very nice selection of PS1 and PS2 hacking devices, and their prices were reasonable. They shipped via UPS Ground and filled my order promptly. I would recommend them to anyone who is interested in buying the Linux kit from a vendor who isn't Sony.

    --rwatson

    1. Re:Dealer recommendation by KwamiMatrix · · Score: 1

      Hmm, and how exactly do you plan to get another linux disto to run on Sony's PS2's R5900, a.k.a Emotion Engine architechture? Huh? Didn't think about that did ya? Foolish

    2. Re:Dealer recommendation by zeno_2 · · Score: 1

      Wait until someone posts the binaries.. Didn't think about that did ya?

    3. Re:Dealer recommendation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wait till nobody uses Linux anymore ... Didn't think about THAT did ya?

  42. !COOL!... lets get bleemcast on here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    wow maybe ill go out and buy a ps2... it would theoretically be possible to install a dreamcast emulator on there. Someone should look into this. As it is now you can run ps1 games in a higher than regualr resolution on the dreamcast, but on the ps2 you are stuck with the old resolution. So what we need is to emulate the dreamcast then the ps1 through the dreamcast emulation layer. It cant be that hard right?... well maybe its easier to use the already existing ps1 emulatiuon software to push the res. Anyway if someone knows more than me could they please respond and tell what the possability for doing this is?
    -ok
    -thanks

    1. Re:!COOL!... lets get bleemcast on here by MisterBlister · · Score: 1
      You'll never get a PS2 to run Dreamcast games (or Bleemcast running PSX games) at full speed. The hardware is, while more advanced, way too different and not advanced enough to emulate those differences in software.

      Also, Bleemcast only runs like 2 or 3 games and you need a seperate Bleemcast disc for each game. I believe they released disks for MGS, Gran Turismo 2 and maybe one other? Tekken 3?

      You'd be much better off porting one of the existing Open Source PSX emulators to PS2/Linux. However, you're unlikely to get anywhere near full speed unless you rewrite them to take advantage of the PS1-compatible hardware the PS2 has (the PS2 doesn't really emulate the PS1, the hardware is there to begin with). This would take a lot of effort, which is why Sony didn't bother to create a high-res PS1 solution for PS2.

  43. Does it allow access to the DVD Drive? by jmorris42 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Back when this story last hit /. I observed the dump of dmesg from the thing and the DVD drive was conspiciously absent. Without that we can't build up a DVD/DiVX;)/MP3/OGG/etc player very easy.

    --
    Democrat delenda est
    1. Re:Does it allow access to the DVD Drive? by luckymat · · Score: 1

      If I can read DivXs and mp3s of my network I will be happy!

  44. Linux X-Box? by calebp · · Score: 0

    This is such a sweet idea...and definatly well priced...I dont know if it is totally usefull...why would I want to run gcc on a PS2, when I could run it on a 1.6ghz AMD xp server running debain woody(should be out by the time PS2 linux is)?

    Since I dont have a PS2, this would almost justify getting one...but...

    ...if only I could get this functionality on a system with good games...hmmm...XBox???...oh...I almost forgot who that was made by. *sigh*

    --
    ________________
    "A man prepared who hesitates, is lost." -Dante The Divine Comedy: Inferno Canto XXVIII, 99
  45. Cool! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    But the question is: Does it run Linux?

  46. Wired carries article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Find it here.

  47. DivX by luckymat · · Score: 2, Funny

    I wil be able to watch DivXs and listem to mp3s throught my PS2 !JOY!

    1. Re:DivX by Junta · · Score: 2

      Of course, it would be cheaper to buy a TV card with video out and a little and a little Y-adapter to go from your soundcard out to RCA than to dish out the 200 dollars for a PS2 devel kit....

      --
      XML is like violence. If it doesn't solve the problem, use more.
    2. Re:DivX by luckymat · · Score: 1

      Yeah but thats what i do already. I would prefer not to have my pc set up in the lounge at all.

  48. Popular New Service by PoshSpod · · Score: 3, Funny
    From the playstation2-linux website.


    Site Statistics
    Hosted Projects: 5
    Registered Users: 5


    Hurray and be registered user 6!

    --

    This is my sig.

    1. Re:Popular New Service by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am registered user #6, Ph33r Me!

      32 megs of ram, that really bites
      I was hoping to run apache on this thing (still possible but, yeech)

  49. Linux on X-Box by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think it would be quite amusing if someone ported linux to the x-box.
    Personally, i'd never buy a console - unless it could also be used for other things (firewall,webserver,net gateway, etc)

    still too expensive considering

  50. Yuck! by wkurdzio · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    If Sony had done this "right," this kit wouldn't be horribly out of date. glibc 2.2.2? gcc 2.95.2? XFree86 3.3.6? Cripes! Can any of the maintainers comment on whether they've recieved any patches from Sony or not? It'd be interesting to see if Sony's going to actually commit to the Linux community or if they're going to leave it to the rest of us to keep the PS2 port up to date. It blows my mind that Sony didn't go w/ XFree86 4 as it's got *so* many performance improvements over 3, especially in the area of 3D graphics.

    1. Re:Yuck! by AnimeFreak · · Score: 2

      If I am not incorrect, the hacked-up version of Debian has newer versions of the above software.

      If you really want to, you could just go the NetBSD route.

    2. Re:Yuck! by chrisv · · Score: 2, Insightful


      >this kit wouldn't be horribly out of date.
      >glibc 2.2.2?



      Since when is glibc 2.2.2 horribly out of date? I can see the kernel being mentioned as out of date (2.2.1 from what I saw), but the C library? Sure, it's been out for a year, but there have only been 2 point releases since then, nothing more.



      >gcc 2.95.2?



      Uhm. What does 2.95.3, or 2.95.4 offer that 2.95.2 doesn't? (And don't even try telling me about 3.0.x.) And how often to you use those features?



      >XFree86 3.3.6?



      OK, so that might be just a little out of date. But it works. And I really doubt that you'll be doing a whole hell of a lot of 3D on it to begin with; if that were the case, I wouldn't doubt that Sony would release a new version with XFree 4 or something like that in it.



      So... what exactly was this about completely out of date software?

      --

      Dogma: Dead (mostly because your Karma ran it over)

    3. Re:Yuck! by chefren · · Score: 1

      >Uhm. What does 2.95.3, or 2.95.4 offer that 2.95.2 doesn't? (And don't even try telling me about 3.0.x.) And how often to you use those features?

      Uhm. Over a years worth of bugfixes?

      >OK, so that might be just a little out of date.

      A little? How about the 2.4 kernel and XFree 4.x for DRI?

      >Since when is glibc 2.2.2 horribly out of date?

      Why use 2.2.2 when newer versions are source and binary compatible and contain bugfixes?

    4. Re:Yuck! by chrisv · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Did you consider that perhaps they simply didn't have the time to do any of the above with the release? I wouldn't doubt that Sony made numerous patches to all of the packages listed to make them work on the PS2. If they were releasing an x86 distribution, I might go complaining to them asking why they didn't include, at the very least, glibc 2.2.4, XFree 4.0.3, kernel 2.4.14 or such, a newer version of gcc, and the like. But, keep in mind, this is a highly targeted distribution, probably with a lot of bugfixes and support issues that they did themselves, given the architecture, so it's not worth even bitching about anyway.

      --

      Dogma: Dead (mostly because your Karma ran it over)

  51. BWUHAHAHA!!! by Pengo · · Score: 3, Informative


    Nope.. sorry. too slow and windows is way to bloated for the memory spec of that machine , especially as a guest OS.

    Also, VMWARE is i386 only (binary remember).

    1. Re:BWUHAHAHA!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      VMWARE succedes so well because the only thing that it does not emulate is the processor. That's why it is i386-only and there are not versions for SPARC or others (that would be a very interesting market at all)

  52. Question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Do we hate Sony today?

    Last week, we hated Sony for its DRM copy-protection on Sony Memory sticks.

    The week before that, we loved Sony because they were releasing a PS2 Linux kit in Japan.

    The week before that, we hated Sony because they were a key proponent in creating the DMCA.

    The week before that, we liked Sony because of the PS2.

    The week before that, we hated Sony because they shutdown an AIBO hack site.

    Do we like or hate Sony this week?

    1. Re:Question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You'll find that many things are black and white / right and wrong / good and bad, all at the same time. What do you do about it?

      You do what you do.

    2. Re:Question by DNAGuy · · Score: 1

      So we pass judgement on actions rather than some all-encompassing love/hatred. We like some things they've done, we don't like others. Seems pretty reasonable to me.

      --

      BRENT ROCKWOOD, EST'd 1975

    3. Re:Question by zeno_2 · · Score: 1

      I think sony is one of those companies who has a lot of divisions who make good products (mp3 players, stereo's, dvd players, etc) and also a big company who has shareholders, a company who wants to maximize profits, etc..

      Generally I like sony and buy sony stuff, I don't agree with everything they do, but its hard to find a company out there who is 100% perfect. We can still bitch at sony for dumb things they do, and buy products from them that are good..

    4. Re:Question by bshanks · · Score: 1

      hate

    5. Re:Question by Kefabi · · Score: 1

      Sony is a very big company. Different people in different parts of the company are going to make different decisions.

      We can like the good decisions, and boo the bad decisions. We shouldn't shun the entire company because of some of the crap they pull and then ignore the good things they do.

      Same goes for any other company. (AOL/TW, Microsoft, etc...)

  53. KERNEL 2.2.1 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hello?? 2.2.1?!! Welcome to the year 2002 Sony. Screw this crap I'm gonna try getting Dreamcast Linux compiled again...

    1. Re:KERNEL 2.2.1 by Bartacus · · Score: 1

      For those of us too lazy to cross-compile, Adrian O'Grady over at fivemouse.com has a DiscJuggler image up for download.

      It's based on kernel 2.3.41 if I remember correctly, and includes XFree, PrBoom, and some standard binaries. (vi, etc.)

      This is the first burn that I've had with game controller, keyboard, and mouse support.

      --
      -- he's not heavy, he's my sysadmin!
  54. I don't know you! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's my purse!

  55. This could be an interesting gave dev platform by LoRdTAW · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Although I see no real reason to buy one other then for the "cool" factor, I do see some potential for making home brew ps2 games. Although games take years to devlope woulden't it be fun to play with a ps2 system and try to make linux based games or port other OS game code to the ps2?

    1. Re:This could be an interesting gave dev platform by Mister+Snee · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I know that certain demoscene types have knocked off a demo or two for Linux over the last few years. Good ones, too. Since console demos have been so popular for so long (there's tons for the Dreamcast and Playstation -- people were even hacking up intros for the SNES), this could lead to a very cool cross-over.

  56. disc 1? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Disc1 - Runtime environment (closed source)
    Disc2 - Linux (open source)

    What is a runtime environment?

  57. $199? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Who would tell the japanese smoked quality crack?

  58. Windows users special price by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Didn't you read the notice?

    "If you ever run MS Windows before, the price is $900. The custumer must prove not to be a Windows zealot for the reduced price.".

    So you don't have to worry about the price. Let me know and i can sell you one with free shipping!

  59. Television output by Linux+Freak · · Score: 4, Interesting

    According to the press release, ``The graphics output requires a high-resolution computer display, with standard output set as XGA (1024 x 768 resolution); home televisions cannot be used as monitors."

    This is the only thing that bugs me (well, aside from the fact that I live in Japan and this won't run on my Japanese PS/2, and the Japanese version of the kit is high near impossible to obtain). I don't really _need_ a monitor (I'd just ssh in from my main workstation) but I would really like to be able to, say, watch streaming video on my TV. (Example: Star Trek Enterprise won't be showing in Japan for like, another 2 years. I have been grabbing eps from the 'net and watching them on my crappy 17" LCD monitor, while my 24" TV sits there idle.)

    Anybody know more about this? Surely the development of a driver to push video through the RCA video hookup wouldn't be too difficult?

    1. Re:Television output by colinguthrie · · Score: 1

      From the playstation2-linux.com project FAQs: Can I use a TV as my display ? Yes. However, it is necessary to install Linux (for PlayStation 2) for the first time using a compatible VESA Monitor that supports "sync on green". Once Linux has been installed, it is possible to configure it to boot using TV display from then on. Some digital TV (DTV) modes are also supported (separate cables may be required for DTV).

    2. Re:Television output by k-rad · · Score: 1

      Actually if you read the FAQ that is linked to in the article. They specifically addressed the issue of being able to run it on your TV. YES, you can run it on your TV, but for the initial setup of PS2 Linux you must use a monitor. From then on, however, you can use your television.

      --
      --->----
    3. Re:Television output by markmoss · · Score: 2

      TV sets are pretty good at displaying moving, colored graphics, but lousy at displaying a text file; the maximum readable line length is about 40 characters. Sony assumes (correctly, I think) that anyone who needs Linux on their PS/2 is going to need better text display capabilities. That is, they are doing their best to make this a platform for writing games, not pirating them -- and if you are coding, you need a decent monitor. You also need a better monitor than a TV for web-surfing...

      So they do make it possible to set the video to the TV output (you'll need this when you want to run that game you wrote), but set the system so the first boot will be to a monitor. This seems to forget two groups of people:

      1) SSH: Real hackers already have a computer, and they'd probably much rather type on that than on the PS2 anyhow, so they'll probably prefer the PS2 Linux set up for remote control, and going to the TV when they want to try running a game. So borrow an SVGA monitor to boot it the first time and change the settings. You've already got at least one.

      2) Non-hackers that just want to play the games hackers are giving away. Some of these people just might have a little trouble finding a monitor they can borrow for the first set-up. Sony has also made distributing the games a little difficult, with the CD/DVD player apparently not being good reading non-factory disks; they're probably not too enthused about turning customers into competitors with their own games division. However, it doesn't sound like they blocked downloading games from the internet.

  60. OT: mailto scheme in your sig by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    your sig says "mailto://darren_kruse@hotmail.com"

    the 'mailto' scheme doesn't use slashes

    (see rfc 2368 - 'The mailto URL scheme')

  61. Something about this doesn't feel right. by Hal-kun · · Score: 5, Informative

    After I wrote my Playstation Documentation Project I have had to dance with Sony playing the intellectual property game with me and Connectix. I've taken up a hobby of watching Sony pretty closely when it comes to them protecting thier I.P. and tend to become even more intrested when they start becoming "generous" like this. It's hard to think that there are no strings attached. Allow me to give you a little history.

    When Sony released the "Net Yaroze" (A grey PSX painted black for hobbiests), there was a very restrictive licence in the contract you had to sign. This included a "all programs created with the Yaroze are property of Sony" clause. They also popped in an NDA for good mesure too. It was a little too resticting for me.

    When I was halfway though my Doc, I let my e-mail show up on a PSXDev mailing list informing them of the Doc I was working on. I almost immidiatly got an e-mail from Sony of Japan(!) asking if I spoke Japanese. When I answered that I did, I got a real nastygram in Japanese basicly saying that if I even think about publising any of the libary commands to the PSX I'd be up the proverbial estuary without means of locomotion. A few months later I published, had a little tussle about the BIOS hooks, and now I'm here.

    I haven't played with the Japanese Linux for PS2, but it still stinks. I used to live in Japan and know first hand that they have very restrictive intellectual property laws. (Like music CDs that are made for rental and others that you can buy, but they have to be at a sold at a particular price set by the company.) I can tell you right away, If you are thinking of doing anything that reqires accessing the CD/DVD-ROM, such as DVD Playback, reading files files from a disk, or even finding something in /dev you are going to be sorely disappointed. If you can access the CD-ROM, color me suprised.

    Be aware that were will probably going to be proprietary drives/libs that you will not be able to reverse without Sony calling the lawyers. I know you will have *ZERO* access to the bootloader. Once again, if this isn't the case, I'll be pleasently suprised again.

    Finally, I doubt that you will be able to play PS2 games/DVDs out of the moniter adapter. If you do, if I remeber, you will only get the green channel to show up.

    I'm also sure that if you make a copy of the Linux disk for some sap with a hacked harddrive and a modchip, Sony will be knocking.

    Just a heads up.

    -Joshua Walker

    1. Re:Something about this doesn't feel right. by KwamiMatrix · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Um, your an idiot. Try reading up on the specs of the Japanese PS2 Linux kit.

    2. Re:Something about this doesn't feel right. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hmm.

      I've nearly finished writing an EE core. Will I get my ass kicked if I continue working on it & make it freely available?

    3. Re:Something about this doesn't feel right. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would be very suprised if you can't add an external $75 DVD ROM to the hard drive connector.

  62. FreeBSD 4.5 by Bender+Unit+22 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    And now even FreeBSD 4.5 is released. My local mirror was updated last night(watched the ISOs upload). Now to slashdot those ftps.

    1. Re:FreeBSD 4.5 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      FreeBSD is fucking irrelevant. Got SMP working yet? Sheesh.

  63. Re:Sony maintains control � no ad-hoc DVD authorin by JamesKPolk · · Score: 2

    Sure you can.

    It has a NIC. It has a Hard Drive. What more do you neeD?

  64. Play by dostick · · Score: 2, Funny


    Why Linux? It's PLAYstation !

  65. Mod this up : PS2 now legal to backup cds! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Now that this is no longer merely a game console, but rather an OFFICIAL "general Purpose Computing Device" because the vendor is offering Linux or allowing linux to be used on it, it is LEGAL TO MAKE BACKUPS OF GAME MEDIA you own!

    This is a great day for neo4, messaih, and neo2.2 mod chips for the PS2. They are more legal than ever before now that this is a general purpose computer.

    This means copying mp3 or audio cds on it is legal (if ever possible technically).

    It means so many things under US law.

    This is a great day for those that worry about losing their data and requiring backups of their Playstation cds (and PLAYBACK using chips that are legal only if this a computer and not a console)

    HA!

  66. Sony management misguided by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is a waste of Sony dollars and just plays
    into the empty Linux hype. Sony should concentrate on getting good quality game
    development, not port yet another toy operating
    system to their box.

  67. What would make sense is not this... by fferreres · · Score: 0

    What would make sense for sony is to depend on Linux for the OS and become hardware producers and to collect royalties (just like they have been doing up to now, but in a different fashion).

    1) Use the Linux OS
    2) Build a console a la X-Box. That is, depend on almost-existing hardware (meaning the have some exclusive features, etc).
    3) Sell the SDK for game producers or charge them a fee so that the games can run on the Playstation.
    4) Leverage on everything that already runs on Linux. Email client, browser, DVD play, Mp3 players, etc.

    That way people will have a system which has the very best games they WANT to buy, an access to email, web, etc. and at an AFFORDABLE price. And the system is always up to date and has no costs for Sony, as it's 99% already available.

    Else, they will die like dog under the X-Box functionality and code leveraged from Windows and the hardware in which it runs (Nvidia, etc.).

    I wouldn't enjoy Gates owing their market for LACK OF VISION.

    --
    unfinished: (adj.)
  68. Right Direction by tanveer1979 · · Score: 1

    Well,
    Finally sony took the plunge. Its great. I really wonder about the distance the Linux community has travelled! In 91 Linus wouldnt have even thought about such a thing happening... late 90's were spent in getting the server space, and now the new millenium signals Linux arriving in our homes.
    Hope this continues!

    --
    My Aurora : http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o91ZsGwJYyg
    FB : https://www.facebook.com/TanveersPhotography
  69. Thank you (was Re: TEXT OF THE ARTICLE) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Thank you.
    You are a hero.

    Alexis Frisson

    1. Re:Thank you (was Re: TEXT OF THE ARTICLE) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is the wise bird who builds his nest inside a tree.

      Alexis Frisson

  70. Sync-on-Green by Shadowcaster · · Score: 1
    Perfect use for my old Sony monitor I'd think. It's a GDM-1960 if I recall correctly. Huge screen on the sucker (comparing to the 14" I'm on right now, it's GIANT!).

    Don't complain about the lack of size for a computer monitor, just pick up one of these things. They're not all that expensive. And, if someone figures how to just use a TV like the damn console was meant to do in the first place, there's mods you can do to the monitor to make it composite sync as well. Then just use it for the PC. :)

    The only issue I can think of is the PS2's refresh rates.. anyone happen to know what they are? That Sony monitor wants a 100Hz horizontal I believe.. and before someone says it, I seriously doubt that just because both units are Sony that they're automatically interoperable.

    1. Re:Sync-on-Green by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I also got one cheap and I did the mod. Works great, but only at 1280x1024.

      This is the most useful page I've come across regarding this monitor -

      http://www.geocities.com/SiliconValley/Foothills/4 467/fixedsync.html

      Note the modeline tweaks. (4467, not 4 467)

  71. Whoa... by Paradoxish · · Score: 1

    This probably won't matter to a lot of people, but I've been working to build computers (and LCD screens, of course) into my car for a while now. I was also vaguely planning to get a PS2 in there sooner or later. I could kill two birds with one stone this way. And, to be honest, $300 for another PS2 + $200 for the kit would cost about the same as the regular computer hardware and it would be more compact. Hmm...

    --
    If you need to interpret my post, then you don't get it.
  72. No by ecampbel · · Score: 3, Informative

    The PS2 boots off the second layer of dual-layer DVD-ROMs. Such DVD's can't be produced by Apple's or anyone else's drives since producing dual-layered disks requires fusing two single-layer disks together, which can only be done in a factory.

    --

    Sig goes here
    1. Re:No by ecampbel · · Score: 2, Informative

      Oops, this is actually one of the copyright protection schemes of the X-Box, not the Playstation 2. Still, the PS 2 has other copyright protection schemes built into its hardware that accomplish the same thing, namely no booting of burned games. To get around these restrictions, you'll have to buy a mod chip. Futzing around with Apple's burner most likely will not accomplish much.

      --

      Sig goes here
    2. Re:No by Lumpy · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Yes you can...

      Sorry, But I have seen a PS2 that was chipped cold boot to a DVD backup of Kolona 2. It happily booted the DVD and started the game. Only a un-modified PS2 display's this behaivoir... mods that correct these little bugs make everything alright....

      but then again.... How the hell does it boot a origional DVD disc when modified to boot from a backup?

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    3. Re:No by zeno_2 · · Score: 1

      The mod chip just doesn't do the checks on the dvd's/cd's to see if they are legit or not, so all the old original disks should work..

    4. Re:No by Lumpy · · Score: 2

      but the origional poster said that the boot is off the special 2nd layer that cannot be created by a burner, so how is the mod-chip telling the PS2 to boot from the special layer on this disc but boot from a different layer on this other disc?

      It is starting to sound like the myth that the PS2 boots off of the 2nd DVD layer is nothing but hogwash.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    5. Re:No by billcopc · · Score: 1

      It is starting to sound like the myth that the PS2 boots off of the 2nd DVD layer is nothing but hogwash

      It is. The XBox uses this trick to some extent, not the PS2. I should know, I've got a dozen DVDR discs sitting right next to my console (too bad the DVD burner's on RMA right now - piece of shiznit).

      --
      -Billco, Fnarg.com
    6. Re:No by zeno_2 · · Score: 1

      I dont know if its the case with ps2, I dont think so, but it really doesn't matter because a mod chip can change how the ps2 boots up. The oringinal way looks for something specific, install mod chip, and it no longer looks for that. A lot of games on ps2 are CDS anyway, not DVD, so it cant be a dual layer thing, unless they use a seperate copyright protection scheme on dvd's and cds..

      It probably is hogwash about the 2nd layer thing, but the ps2 does 'something' to check on the validity of the cd/dvd. A mod chip fixes that as far as I understand..

    7. Re:No by kesuki · · Score: 1

      Modchips and EA Daughter Cards (since EA games come with additional protection.) Work by esentially taking over the boot process when a backed up DVD-r is detected by the DVD-rom in the PS2. They are all Stealth nowadays so when an original from the same region as your PS2 is inserted it pretends like it doesn't exist and isn't wired into the PS2. Since sony and EA and the like are mostly concerned with backed up games being played they try to find a way to make backed up games identify themselves as backed up or to reveal that a modchip is installed and then halts the program with an Anti-piracy message. Usually within 2 weeks of any circumvention there is a patch available to the modchip code that lets it fool even the newest software. For a while the original Stealth-1 modchip for the PSX allowed the reset button to be used to alter the behavior of the modchip to avoid any possible detection method. I have yet to see a single game that can't be made to work with the Stealth-1 although many require 3-4 resets. FFIX actually requires seperate CD-Rs be burned of disc 1 to circumvent the copyprotection code with the stealth-1 but there are Stealth V models now that work with anything, without any annoying tricks. Also sockets have become very common because the more sony/etc change the protection the more modchips the modchip sellers can sell.
      I've known quite a few people who run a side buisness in college of installing modchips.
      I'm not sure why EA games (like FFX) require a whole daughtercard to be run (from a backup or import) on a modified PS2, but the card also promises the ability to play Backed up DVD movies too. So they're worth looking into once DVD-r prices drop to the $3 or less price range.
      BTW the modchips/daughtercards will allow cd-r PSX games to play too, although it's much cheaper to get a PS One and modchip if you're not going to use the PS2 modchip abilities.
      BTW I do buy games -- just not the sucky ones. so really the modchip only saves rental fees, but considering I just spent $7 renting FFX for a week that could probably add up on the games I don't want to buy. I don't buy FF games til they're on the discount/rerelease rack, because I know they'll never have collecter value. Even if I'm wrong about that I'm sure there will be more value in my more rare hard to find RPG games.

  73. Re:Sony maintains control � no ad-hoc DVD authorin by dimator · · Score: 2

    With my hacker/geek hat on, I'm kinda disappointed that this won't allow non Sony sanctioned s/w to be produced for the PS2

    Oh, pull the GPL out of your ass. Sony has gone out of it's way to put this together; they even had a petition to gauge interest, meaning they gave two shits about consumer demand. They can impose restrictions if they want.

    As we all know, the big-console makers expect to make up for the money lost in hardware sales with software sale royalties from developers. There's no way you can even expect them to allow people to burn/distribute their own works.

    --
    python -c "x='python -c %sx=%s; print x%%(chr(34),repr(x),chr(34))%s'; print x%(chr(34),repr(x),chr(34))"
  74. Wrong. Once setup, you can use TV by ecampbel · · Score: 5, Informative

    Can I use a TV as my display ?

    Yes. However, it is necessary to install Linux (for PlayStation 2) for the first time using a compatible VESA Monitor that supports "sync on green". Once Linux has been installed, it is possible to configure it to boot using TV display from then on. Some digital TV (DTV) modes are also supported (separate cables may be required for DTV).

    Which Display Resolutions are supported ?

    NTSC/PAL interlaced and non-interlaced

    DTV 480P, 720P and 1080I modes

    VESA modes 640x480, 800x600, 1024x768, 1280x1024 at 60/75 Hz

    More:
    Linux (for PlayStation®2) Version 1.0 FAQ

    --

    Sig goes here
    1. Re:Wrong. Once setup, you can use TV by srw · · Score: 1

      Okay. I was going by the press release which says:

      > The graphics output requires a high-resolution
      > computer display, with standard output set
      > as XGA (1024 x 768 resolution); home televisions
      > cannot be used as monitors. Computer displays
      > supporting "sync on green" are mandatory.

      The FAQ clears this up that this requirement is only for installation.

  75. No by spacefrog · · Score: 2, Informative

    >> I wonder if Wine or lindows
    >> would efficiently run on this now.

    Nope.

    Wine only runs on x86 CPU's, Wine does not provide a CPU emulator.

    Below is quoted from the Wine FAQ:

    >> Wine is being developed specifically to run
    >> on the Intel x86 class of CPUs under certain
    >> UNIXes that run on the x86 platform.

  76. Sony abides by GPL by jgarzik · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The press release nor either of the PS2 web sites appeared to mention source code, as far as I could see. So I asked for a clarification.

    Color me impressed. Not only did I receive a reply within minutes, but they are indeed fully abiding by the GPL.

    This forum message contains the reply with a bit more info.

    Thanks, Sony!

    1. Re:Sony abides by GPL by Johnny+Mnemonic · · Score: 1


      I wasn't impressed. Some random stranger on a forum posting that the source will be on the second CD doesn't do much to convince me that this is Sony's official line.

      What would convince me is if they included it in their press release, but I didn't see it there, either. I wouldn't take this post as a guarantee of, frankly, antything at all.

      --

      --
      $tar -xvf .sig.tar
  77. They want to sell me my own code? by thogard · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I've been contributing to open source projects for 15 years and now these jokers want to sell me that code back?

    I don't think thats quite right.

    1. Re:They want to sell me my own code? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes. That's one of the things that can happen with open source projects. If you dont like it, perhaps you shouldn't have contributed. Perhaps you should just be thankful they have to release the source to their changes. (Thanks to the good old GNU GPL)

    2. Re:They want to sell me my own code? by evilviper · · Score: 2

      Isn't it amazing that with all the posturing and screaming, that the GPL doesn't make one ounce of difference in the real world.

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    3. Re:They want to sell me my own code? by SpinyNorman · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Sure it does - the GPL means that if you choose to buy the product you will also have complete source code for the GPL'd portions of it - complete with Sony extensions.

      Also note that your $199 buys you a hard drive and ethernet adaptor as well as the Sony extended PS2 supported versions of gcc and XFree86...

      How come you find $199 for this a rip off, yet don't complain about RedHat or SuSE selling Linux without hard drives and network adaptors thrown in?

      It's Linux whiners and cheapskates like you that put Loki out of business.

    4. Re:They want to sell me my own code? by pmz · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I don't think thats quite right.

      It is right. Sony chose to organize a port of free software to their platform and, then, sell it to recoup their costs and possibly make a profit. Most free software licenses clearly allow this. Just be thankful that there is yet another platform on which free software is available.

      If you don't like the facts that the PS2 is proprietary, DVDs are controlled by megacorporations, and you have to buy the Linux DVD for the PS2 from Sony, then just use another platform (such as a comparably inexpensive PC) to run the same software. You are not forced by anyone to pay for your own code.

    5. Re:They want to sell me my own code? by evilviper · · Score: 2
      Sure it does - the GPL means that if you choose to buy the product you will also
      have complete source code for the GPL'd portions of it - complete with Sony
      extensions. </blockquote>Only extensions you will get the code for are the ones that are source-integrated with previously GPLed programs. Things like kernel modules (ala. TiVo) don't have to be released. The ISO Image is still copyrighted if nothing else is, making duplicating it illegial, and any programs they built from scratch are not GPLed. (Likely several of their own propritary programs are required to make the CD work.<blockquote>How come you find $199 for this a rip off, yet don't complain about RedHat or SuSE
      selling Linux without hard drives and network adaptors thrown in? </blockquote> First, I never said I find it a ripoff... I'm merely bringing a little reality to you GPL zeleots. However, the difference is that you can get Redhat, SuSE, and any other distro for free (downloadable, infintely copyable, unlimited useage, etc). <blockquote>It's Linux whiners and cheapskates like you that put Loki out of business. </blockquote>Oh so many problems with that last sentence. 1. I am a BSDer, I very much dislike Linux/Gnu. 2. I'm not a cheapscate. I've established that I don't care about the $200 price tag. I've bought several OpenBSD/FreeBSD CDs, and accessories such as ThinkGeek carries. 3. I'm not a gamer, and I don't run Linux. If I was a gamer, and I ran Linux, and I liked the games Loki ported, I wouldn't mind buying them (but that's a lot of "IF"s).
      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    6. Re:They want to sell me my own code? by CyberKnet · · Score: 3, Funny

      This is actually kind of funny =)

      Sony chose to organize a port of free software to their platform and, then, sell it to recoup their costs .... Just be thankful that there is yet another platform on which free software is available

      Does anyone else see the irony of this statement? =)

      --
      Video meliora proboque deteriora sequor - Ovidius
    7. Re:They want to sell me my own code? by SpinyNorman · · Score: 2

      So you find it a problem that the GPL allows people to write commercial software such as TiVo for Linux?

      Note that Redhat etc allowing free downloads of their software, even of ready to burn ISOs(!), is not a requirement of the GPL, which only requires that they provide source when you *BUY* their product. Free downloads are just part of their business model, and frankly are probably a bad idea since they have convinced so many people such as yourself that anything Linux related should be free and that Linux software has no value.

    8. Re:They want to sell me my own code? by evilviper · · Score: 2
      So you find it a problem that the GPL allows people to write commercial software
      such as TiVo for Linux? </blockquote><p>No, I've mentioned I'm a BSDer. I think ANY use of Open Source code should be permitted. It doesn't hurt me to have TiVo NOT contribute code back into the tree. It should be a choice, not a compulsion.<p>
      My problem is that the GPL is not an Open Source license... It is a "Free Software" license as Stallman has so repetitively pointed out. The GPL's intentions, and it's proponent's intentions, are to force developers to release their code for free (such as RedHat does).

      My sole reason for spotlighting the situation is simply that people release their code under the GPL thinking that they are somehow ensuring that Microsoft and other companies will have to turn into software hippies if they every use that GPLed code. I don't have a problem selling it. I have a problem with people that don't have a grip on reality, which is in turn a detriment to the Openm Source community.
      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    9. Re:They want to sell me my own code? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are a sad troll. The GPL is not about getting software without paying, but having access to the source code.

    10. Re:They want to sell me my own code? by evilviper · · Score: 2

      I applogize for the formatting. It won't be happening again.

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    11. Re:They want to sell me my own code? by SpinyNorman · · Score: 2

      My sole reason for spotlighting the situation is simply that people release their code under the GPL thinking that they are somehow ensuring that Microsoft and other companies will have to turn into software hippies if they every use that GPLed code.

      I don't get that impression. There's a big difference between the comments you'll find here on slashdot from people who have never released any GPL'd software in their lives, and those who have done, and have made informed choices about what licence - GPL, LGPL, BSD, etc reflects the rights and restrictions they want to enforce.

      If one had to guess at the most common motivation for people releasing code under the GPL (those that actually do it), then I'd guess it's simply because they used GPL tools to develop it and want to play nice and give back and get some peer recognition (I've released code free of ANY licencing for these reasons), and in many cases (but with some very major notable exceptions) because they'd have a hard time making money from it anyway.

    12. Re:They want to sell me my own code? by evilviper · · Score: 2

      My point was that most of the people I've come across using the GPL are NOT making an informed decision. Obviously our experiences may differ, but I am sure you could find plenty of mis-informed developers releasing GPLed code.

      As far a wanting to 'give back', why not use the BSD license instead? They still recieve the recognition if that is what they seek, and the code is usable to pretty much anyone in any project. When code is released under the BSD license or is make public domain, it can get used in a GPLed project, a BSDed project, an Apache Licensed, MPLed, etc (pretty much anything). When code is GPLed, it stays GPLed, and any code added on to it or linked to it is GPLed. The GPL really limits the use of the code released, and the fact that the GPL is not objected to, makes it seem like it's an acceptable license, while it's in fact a detriment to every project out there that would like to use the code, but has a non-GPL license.

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    13. Re:They want to sell me my own code? by pmz · · Score: 1

      Does anyone else see the irony of this statement? =)

      Well, this just gets back into the free != free ambiguity that the Open Source movement cites. English really is a wonderfully clear language ain't it?

    14. Re:They want to sell me my own code? by SpinyNorman · · Score: 1

      I think what you're saying is that you prefer BSD to Linux! ;-)

    15. Re:They want to sell me my own code? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >Does anyone else see the irony of this statement? =)

      Nope, all I see is someone confused on the meaning of 'free' in this context.

    16. Re:They want to sell me my own code? by evilviper · · Score: 3, Insightful

      While true, you missed the point. I prefer the BSD license to the GPL. I actually despise the GPL, and want people to realize what a piece of crap it is... So I point out it's shortcommings all the time. In this case and others, I tend to shatter all the popular myths surrounding it. It's an Open Source worm. Before the GPL got popular, you could use code from any open source project and have no worries about license conflicts. Now, you need to be very careful of the license because the GPL is a self-propagating virus that spreads itself like the plague.

      People using the GPL are like all the people donating to the Red Cross, they think they're doing something good (Fighting Microsoft/Saving Lives) when in fact they are not doing anything of the sort. They are acutally being taken advantage of because of their ignorance.

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    17. Re:They want to sell me my own code? by SpinyNorman · · Score: 1

      It's an interesting point since I doubt many people using the GPL want to disallow use of their code in other non-commercial projects.

      I'm not so familair with the BSD licence (I know that people used to complain about the potentially infinitely growing attribution comments that it required)... What are the key differences between the current BSD licence and GPL? Can BSD code be used in commercial projects?

    18. Re:They want to sell me my own code? by HuguesT · · Score: 1

      You may dislike the GPL but it does not qualify
      as crap. Rather it is a well designed piece of
      legalese to achieve some goals that you do not
      agree with.

      I think the oposite regarding your comparison to
      donating to the red cross: people releasing BSD code
      are the one being taken advantage of. It might end
      up in Microsoft products even without your
      knowledge, whereas Microsoft cannot legally use
      GPLed code without making their software also free.

      The GPL is also not a virus in the sense that it
      does not propagate without the consent of the
      developers.

    19. Re:They want to sell me my own code? by evilviper · · Score: 2

      http://rcooley.dyndns.org/bsd.txt

      The BSD license is only slightly more restrictive than public domain in that it merely requires attribution, and disallows the unauathorized use of the author's name. It does not disallow propritary software, but what is wrong with that?

      By disallowing propritary use of your software, you are striking a blow to your own software. Do you think TCP/IP, TELNET, or FTP would have been popular if propritary use of the code was not allowed? No Way. GPLers that are crying for standards just don't realize the hyppocricy.

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    20. Re:They want to sell me my own code? by evilviper · · Score: 2
      it is a well designed piece of legalese to achieve some goals that you do not agree with.

      What it acceives is something NOBODY agrees with, they just don't realize it. You're practically saying the Taliban is a great organization that us Americans just don't agree with. Only those GPL users that really want every commercial software endavor to die, want to take away programmer's rights to choose any license for their own software, and do not want standarization, are true GPL supporters.

      : people releasing BSD code are the one being taken advantage of. It might end up in Microsoft products even without your knowledge, whereas Microsoft cannot legally use GPLed code without making their software also free.
      No. Perhaps my software will end up in a Microsoft, Apple, or IBM product without my knowledge. So what? Does that limit my right to what I've released? Does that hurt me IN ANY WAY? In fact, I'd like to see that happen, as it promotes standards.

      If SAMBA was released under a BSD license, every network on earth would be running SMB/CIFS. Instead, there are a dozen competing network filesystems which are all banished to their own niche. Hell, IIRC Microsoft used Open Source IPSec code. Do you hear anyone complaining about that?

      It's people like you that say downloading MP3s is not stealing because the authors haven't lost anything, then turn around and say you are loosing something if your code is used in a propritary program.

      In the mean time, you GPL supporters are like zombies in a DDoS attack. Spreading the GPL as worm, then attacking all those that discredit the GPL and show it for what it is.

      The GPL is also not a virus in the sense that it does not propagate without the consent of the developers.
      If I'm a developer and need to make a program (a DVD player for example) and don't have the resources to reverse engineer the format, then I may not like the GPL, but have no choice but to use it in all of my related code.
      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
  78. Saddam will be grateful by heretic108 · · Score: 1

    I heard some time ago that PSs are considered a 'potential security risk' because of the possibility of adapting them to missile control applications.

    Given the disharmony between Iraq and the Taleban, this gives new meaning to the post-Sep11 catchphrase 'rm -rf /bin/laden'.

    --
    -- In the beginning was the WORD, and the WORD was UNSIGNED, and the main(){} was without form and void...
    1. Re:Saddam will be grateful by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That was Sony marketing.

      "Our machine is powerful enough to guide missiles."
      "Ooh, aah. Our money is yours!"
      "Good little sheep."

  79. Great Possibilities for DtiVo & TiVo users by joeler · · Score: 1

    It's only a matter of time until someone comes up with a digital recorder setup that can be used in combination with Dtivo ect. a very nice little addition. Perhaps uing the usb port for input and the networking will allow storage on cds, and other devices for more permanent recordings of our favorite shows."Season Passes" would have a new meaning, having an entire season on a few cds. Starting to sound a lot like the new Moxi? But wait, isn't Microsoft most recent plans for doing the same with Ultimate TV? Yes, Sony must have seen this as the next step for the PS2, just allowing open source to help get there faster.

    --
    >>>please remove "nospam" from email address
  80. $299? by ShadeARG · · Score: 1

    According to this link:

    The kits will cost $188.30 in Japan, $299 in the United States and $215 in Europe.

    1. Re:$299? by SVDave · · Score: 2
      Actually, it says:

      The kits will cost $188.30 in Japan, $199 in the United States and $215 in Europe.
      .
  81. Europe by JohnFred · · Score: 2, Interesting


    Given the recent modchip and regional liscencing case, this leaves Europe (SCEEurope's teritorry) as the only region you can't run Linux on the PS2.

    So can Alan Cox be arrested for running Linux on his PS2 in the UK? Hmm. Also, you will note, Blokman Trading the guys who did the "privateer" Linux port to the Playstation have appeare to have dissapeared off the web. What happened to them?

    Sony are in the same class as Microsoft: they seek to create a monopoly by proprietary lock - in, and regional liscencing, so this is the equivalent of MS Linux coming out.

    Yet everyone celebrates...

    --
    /usr/games/fortune > ~/.signature
    1. Re:Europe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sony is more evil than Microsoft. They are members of RIAA, MPAA, 4C. They push DRM, DMCA onto user. Remember the famous quote from Sony exec that talks about bring the content management war to your living room. They make the TV, hardware, firmware, games, movies, music, pet and law.

      Microsoft do not make laws yet.

    2. Re:Europe by Simn · · Score: 1

      Eh, no, at the bottom of this page they say that they're releasing a european version at the same time...

    3. Re:Europe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Eh, no, at the bottom of that page [scee.net] they say that "if there is sufficient interest release may be possible later in 2001"

      So you're wrong!

      Sony have stuffed Europe AGAIN.

    4. Re:Europe by Simn · · Score: 1
      So I guess we read things differently then. This is what I read (cut and paste from the above mentioned page):
      The Linux Community In Europe, London, January 30, 2002 -- Sony Computer Entertainment Europe (SCEE) will release the Linux Kit (for PlayStation 2) in May 2002, targeted towards the Linux community in Europe.
      And also previously on the page:
      In response to this movement, Sony Computer Entertainment Europe will now release Linux (for PlayStation 2) to support the Linux user community across the PAL territories.

      It's all pretty unambigous to me...

  82. Re:Sony maintains control � no ad-hoc DVD authorin by Mister+Snee · · Score: 1

    Even aside from the NIC and hard drive, you can plug whatever you want into those USB's. Pull out a USB DVD-ROM and you're set.

    Hrm, deja vu...

  83. Re:Compulsory military service by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ghandi went to jail too. Didn't make him wrong.

    I was thinking recently. All those people who died in on Sep 11 probably would have given their lives gladly to stop the exact losses of freedom that are going on now in their name. Add anything remotely like the amount of spin the anti-terrorism campaign is getting, and they'd probably sacrifice themselves as willingly as most of these "terrorists" do.

    What am I saying here? Simply that this whole anti-terrorism thing is a flies blatantly in the face of human rights which have been established across the civilised world ever since the fall of Hitler. If you go along with it any further, you're not only misguided and wrong -- you're serving your greatest enemy.

  84. Coming soon... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Linux for X-Box!

    In an unprecendented move to embrace and extend Linux, Microsoft has announced that...

  85. As ive read elsewhere... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Doesnt the PS2 have only 32megs of ram?

    Sure, thats enough to boot, and even enough to run X and a lightweight WM. But then what?

    It cant run gnome, mozilla, staroffice, kde etc, all which require a lot of ram. Unless there is an easy way to upgrade the physical memory on the PS2, I wont buy one!

    Actually it might make a good X terminal ;)

    1. Re:As ive read elsewhere... by EllF · · Score: 1

      If you're interested in this distro for running such apps, you might want to look into a lightweight window manager (if that's an applicable term) like ion. I personally use it on a number of my leaner boxen, and there's no reason you couldn't run konqueror/mozilla/koffice with it on a 32MB system. I'm not so certain about StarOffice - I haven't tried it on anything except my main (and much more modern) system.

      --
      We who were living are now dying
      With a little patience
  86. Linux API by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I wonder if the API that comes with it utilizes its propietary CPU entirely. I dont want to experience the difficulties of the programmers during its early years. Call it lazy, but there are a lot of middleware available for it now, why start it again with its (upcoming) community base.

    Also, has anyone remembered the Yaruza-thingy? its a PS1 for developers, it did'nt get much support before, I hope this time, the PS2 version would do much better for its (upcoming) community.

  87. Re:Answer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We don't like Sony, and it's permanent. After Sony went after AiboPet and the Aibo hack site, they conclusively demonstrated that they are on the wrong side of the DMCA and always will be. When a company tries to say that a customer cannot thouroughly examine a product that has been bought and paid for and waves the DMCA around to threaten people into compliance, they reveal where they're coming from. Since then, Sony has demonstrated that they are smart enough to engage in backpeddling when they are publically called on the carpet to the extent of engaging in damage control on potentially lost market share, but of course they don't actually mean it. So, we'll keep the name "Sony" in the List Of Corporations Who Are Obviously On The Wrong Side Of The DMCA, but we'll keep buying their products because they are responsive when it comes to the damage control thing.

  88. Only for North America ??? by Salsaman · · Score: 3, Funny
    This doesn't do me a lot of good.

    Does anybody know if Sony has any plans to release the kit for European Playstations ?

    I'd definately be up for buying one if they did.

    1. Re:Only for North America ??? by Simn · · Score: 1
      Yes it will be released, but the press release posted in the story was aimed to the american market. The European press release is here (unfortunately it's in some weird .doc format).

      It basically says the same thing as the american release... Here's the first sentence:

      London, January 30, 2002 - Sony Computer Entertainment Europe (SCEE) will release the Linux Kit (for PlayStation(r)2) in May 2002, targeted towards the Linux community in Europe
    2. Re:Only for North America ??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nope
      the link _you_ gave says:
      "Although there are no concrete plans for release in the PAL world, if there is sufficient interest release may be possible later in 2001."

      So no Linux on PS2 for Europe.

    3. Re:Only for North America ??? by Simn · · Score: 1
      I don't know where you learnt to read, but that is not what it says. It says exactly what I said:
      Sony Computer Entertainment Europe (SCEE) will release the Linux Kit (for PlayStation(2) in May 2002, targeted towards the Linux community in Europe.

      It seems strange to me that you can read it in another way.

  89. Alternatives by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A lot of people have moaned about the money - fair enough, it's quite a bit if you are a hard core geek and just want to 'play' with code and not have Sonic eat Mario or whatever these games do.

    Well - there are alternatives. There is a Linux distro for PS1 (no, don't ask me how, but it's not a joke) and quite advanced work for the Dreamcast.

    Both these systems are cheap and the work on the Linux system on the Dreamcast (http://www.sourceforge.net/projects/linuxdc) is moving on apace with new drivers being added on in quick succession.

    The Dreamcast is a pretty good system for new hackers to get their hands dirty with - and there is no mega bureaucracy telling you what code is or is not acceptable.

    And they even tell me it has some quite good games.

  90. Re:Sony maintains control � no ad-hoc DVD authorin by darien · · Score: 1

    Surely someone could write a Linux "wrapper" to launch unsanctioned (and indeed copied) PS2 games? Or am I missing something?

  91. LCD for PS2 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So does this mean sony will soon release the LCD that they showed w/ the PS2 sometime ago?

  92. Re:ps2 by fistynuts · · Score: 1

    I'm sure with a little messing about you could do that on the PS2 already, using the bundled version of BASIC.

    --
    "You heard the man, Tubbs.. get undressed."
  93. Re:ps2 by zudo · · Score: 1

    Every single game I've played on my ps2 locks the anolog mode to on at startup when it detects a dualshock 2.

  94. Re:EXCUSE ME, MY DEAR SIRS. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    and natzis.

  95. Re:ps2 by pauldy · · Score: 1

    Follow the money.

    Microsoft is using their market share in the PC world to leverage their way into the console world. This is what MS has right now that they will use to dominate the console world if they can. They have an OS that is used by more than 50% of the current market. They have numerous other technologies they have either bought for pennies on the dollar from competitors they have squeezed out of the market, or they have straight stolen a few and made them their own.

    How do you compete with this 800lbs gorilla that has no remorse and eats its own kind on a daily basis. You find the one thing they are scared of and pair it up in your arsenal. You make sure they know you have it and aren't afraid to leverage it as well to help erode their current business if they encroach to far into yours.

    So when you ask why just take a look at the marketplace.

    As a Linux user myself I can only hope with a player like Sony backing Linux on their consoles as we move towards the age of networked terminals we get to see more and more applications developed for Linux.

  96. By FAR, the biggest advantage: by mmol_6453 · · Score: 1

    Since the GPL requires the source code to be available, people are going to be able to take this thing apart and port more recent kernels to it.

    That means "Network Block Devices", everyone. The ability to mount any device over a network.

    This means everything from printers to hard drives to sound cards to a multiheaded system!

    --
    What's this Submit thingy do?
  97. OpenGL... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I hope someone does this. It would be cool to make PS2 games, even if I couldn't sell or distribute. That would be some fun stuff.

    Unfortunately, I lack the low level expertise to even attempt porting a graphics library.

  98. Source included on the disc by yerricde · · Score: 2, Informative

    Have you not seen my rants aboutSony blatently [slashdot.org] and knowingly [advogato.org] being in direct violation [advogato.org] of the GPL

    Perhaps Sony f****d up with respect to POSE, but not in this case. All the source code for the included GNU/Linux software comes right on the disc.

    --
    Will I retire or break 10K?
  99. 17 USC 109: Now illegal to rent PS2 games by yerricde · · Score: 2

    Now that this is no longer merely a game console, but rather an OFFICIAL "general Purpose Computing Device" because the vendor is offering Linux or allowing linux to be used on it, it is LEGAL TO MAKE BACKUPS OF GAME MEDIA you own!

    But it also makes it unlawful to rent PS2 games in the US without the permission of each game publisher. According to 17 USC 109(b)(1), it's an infringement of copyright to rent computer software that's not designed for a "video game console" without permission of the copyright holder. This could add up to a lot of red tape for each independent rental shop.

    --
    Will I retire or break 10K?
  100. Re:Television output -- dual TV/RGB monitor combo by GodSpiral · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I agree that lack of TV output is my only complaint with their package.

    I somehow doubt that X can't run on interlaced NTSC, but rather that text is ugly and difficult to read at typical font sizes.

    The option of running at 640x480 or even less if necessary would increase acceptance even if a monitor were recommended.

    Another cool application would be dual monitor support (including TV plus RGB). I have no idea how the connectors work, and this is more viable if VGA is a seperate connector rather than an adapter for s-video or something.

    Virtual desktops in X window managers would let you direct apps to monitors of your choice (say TV displays desktop 2 and 4, and VGA 1 and 3).

  101. Linux on a PS2 by 13Echo · · Score: 1

    *sarcasm*

    And with a mod-chip, you'll be able to share it with your friends. Imagine! A free operating system on a PS2!

    */sarcasm*

    What will Linux on a PS2 do that I can't do with an inexpensive nForce PC?

  102. Lets see... ethernet and 40GB HD.... by GodSpiral · · Score: 1

    Can any of us find a creative way of getting software written by us or our creative internet community partners running on our PS2 with ethernet and HD access?

    Hell even if the HD was so small as to only allow a core linux system, ethernet would let you mount fat32 partitions accross the network.

  103. Summary with prices and timeline by bief · · Score: 1

    News.com has a short summary including prices and a distribution timeline. Not quite $199 in the USA. http://news.com.com/2100-1040-825762.html

  104. Vaio Jr? by Julius+X · · Score: 1

    It seems like this could almost be considered the "VAIO Jr." All they need to do is give you a can of purple/silver paint to repaint your PS2 and you'd have it!

    --

    -Julius X
    remove "-whatkindofspamdoyoutakemefor-" from email to send
  105. a reaction to the xbox? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't you think this is more of a reaction against what Sony thought the xbox would be rather than a move to bring linux to more users?

  106. Oh, come on. You know it's cool by njord · · Score: 2, Insightful

    A lot of people are miffed that Sony's asking $200 this and so and and so forth, but I think it's an okay deal - think how much a 40 gig hd costs (~$100) and an ethernet card (~30). Throw in a great os that has been ported for the first time to a completely foreign architecture (~ $$ who knows?), coupled with the fact that this stuff is not off-the-shelf but has to be tested and repackaged to fit the exacting specs of the PS2 and I think you've got a pretty good deal. Add the $300 for a PS2 plus the $200 for this kit and maybe another $200 for a decent monitor (if you don't have one already), and you've got yourself an incredibly compact, inexpensive graphics workstation with the added bonus of being able to play PS/PS2 games! Everyone who reads slashdot knows that it won't be long before people start writing stuff - utlilities, games, workarounds - and you've got a new platform. So Sony says the PS2 can't read anything but PS/PS2/DVD discs. Then get a usb CD drive and go to town. I think this is a great opportunity to get another big company behind Linux and actually foster support towards the whole user-empowerment idea. Of course they don't want to release the source code, but we'll stick RMS on 'em. Heh. Njord

  107. Or... by Amon+CMB · · Score: 2

    Use the PS2 Hard drive to store the ROMs and MAME.

    --


    Men believe what they want. - Caesar
  108. $199 not $299 by GodSpiral · · Score: 1

    Even, the link you pointed to says its $199 in the US like other links have said.

    I'm as cheap a fuck as they come, but I feel their pricing is reasonable considering that you get some assurance that the stuff will work. Its comparable to buying stuff from IBM, rather than your local mom&pop shop.

    1. Re:$199 not $299 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't be too hard on him - Routers actually screwed up the news release, and they still haven't fixed it. News.com must've caught wind of the error and changed their article. Blue's News, for instance, is still reporting $299 because they got the Reuters version of the release instead of the official one.

  109. I'm still not sure what to make of it by Guppy06 · · Score: 2

    $200 would have been very steep if all it came with was the software, but it doesn't seem so bad when you throw in the 40 GB HDD, the NIC, and the keyboard and such. Heck, might be worth it just for the hardware (finally get my PS2 on my LAN, just like my Dreamcast).

    Also, the kit includes two DVDs. One of the DVDs is supposedly source code, so that still leaves one full DVD for executable code. So either DVDs are now cheaper to make than CDs, or there could be a !#@%$-load of stuff on this disk.

    Third, while Sony has a history of fighting for control of their IP tooth and nail, they aren't so stupid as to believe that they're going to have a strangle-hold on development for PS2 software after the release of this OS. If they wanted to avoid, say, Bleem! being played on the PS2, the only way to avoid that is to just not release Linux (no matter how much they think they've crippled it). So either Sony is being really stupid by releasing the software and trying to lock it down as bes they could, or they're acknowledging the inevitable and letting programmers pretty much do as they will.

    I'm a little miffed by the requirement for a monitor (as if I didn't have too little desk space already), but I'd consider buying it for the ability to play emulators alone. Mark my words: By this time next year you'll have most Linux-based emulators (including even maybe an N64 emulator) ready for use on a PS2 running Linux, complete with full controller port support. And then finally my PS2 will be able to play my PSX Final Fantasy games with the picture quality they were supposed to have...

    1. Re:I'm still not sure what to make of it by billcopc · · Score: 1

      If anyone wanted to run Bleem! on the PS2, I'd have to shake them vigourously for a few minutes. The PS2 already runs legacy PSX games natively.

      Or maybe there's some hidden extra feature I've never heard of in Bleem!. Then again maybe not.

      --
      -Billco, Fnarg.com
    2. Re:I'm still not sure what to make of it by Guppy06 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      "If anyone wanted to run Bleem! on the PS2, I'd have to shake them vigourously for a few minutes. The PS2 already runs legacy PSX games natively."

      But there are currently no real advantages to playing PSX games on a PS2. If anything, using a PS2 is a disadvantage (as anybody who's ever tried to play Final Fantasy V on it can attest).

      The "features" that the PS2 tries to add are faster disc access times (done in a half-assed manner that causes a/v sync problems in many games) and slightly better texture mapping that is either not noticable or makes things generally ugly.

      Bleem! and the countless other PSX emulators for the PC, on the other hand, all improve the graphics considerably by not limiting themselves to PSX-quality resolution and polygon rendering. Sony handicapped the PS2 where PSX games are concerned because they and their third-party developers didn't want to see PSX games competing with PS2 games in terms of graphics. Think what would happen if the $19.95 MGS looked as good as the $49.95 MGS2. Consumers be damned. Personally I would have thought that game companies could just write better games that sell on more merits beyond just graphics, but what do I know?

      (Not that Nintendo did much better with GBC and GBA backwards compatability, but that's another rant.)

      By selling their Linux distro for the PS2 (with gcc, no less!), Sony is opening Pandora's Box. Any control they thought they had over the hardware is out the window, whether they "allow" it or not. The visual gap between PSX and PS2 games will close considerably (if not totally in many cases). And while the Brits can't even get mod chips in their PS2s, I'll be able to play Japanese SATURN games (mmm... Phantasy Star Collection...) on my PS2. Sony's only saving graces here are that the ability to do all this will run the consumers another $200 and won't be playable on a TV (well, until somebody writes a TV driver for the distro).

    3. Re:I'm still not sure what to make of it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A random point - The texture mapping may be "half assed", but play a game such as Vagrant Story on the PS2.

      Vagrant Story becomes nothing short of a masterpiece with its simply exquisite backgrounds.

  110. VNC in lieu of another monitor by Mongoose · · Score: 2

    I can't wait to get my PS2 linux kit. I'll be porting my TombRaider 1-5 ( PC ) engines reimplmentation to PS2 linux. I don't want to buy another monitor right now, so I prob use VNC.

    Yay!

  111. +20, informative by GodSpiral · · Score: 1

    thks for clearing up... press release fked up.

  112. Re:First freeloader post by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I am so sorry, I don't understand why posts like these even show up on Slashdot. Why aern't they gone? It is getting to the point where I don't know whether or not to continue reading here and just leave it to the racists, and microsoft hacks to spew on.
    Does anyone have any idea where we can go to have real discussions without the disgusting and distracting effluent that covers this site so often?

  113. release quota? by klparrot · · Score: 1
    I know when the PS2 LinuxKit came out in Japan, they limited it to a release of something like 1000 copies (at least originally; they may have released more by now). Any word on whether something similar will happen in the US? I'll fight* you for a copy!

    In related news, /. erupted in a religious war today as its users tried to plan a tournament to determine who of us would get the PS2 LinuxKits. Seems nobody could agree on whether it should be fought in Counter-Strike, Unreal Tournament, or Tux Racer. :)

    * in Tux Racer all the way baby.

  114. Doesn't matter anyway... by fitten · · Score: 1

    Users are already scheming a way to hack the hardware and already have ftp sites ready to dish out the software so they can pay nothing or as little as absolutely possible, even if they aren't paying the people who actually developed the port. It is very hard to make money selling Linux software (been there, done that). No matter the price, the only question we were asked was if we had a free version, etc. Being that we were actually trying to make a living and support families with our products/skills, it just didn't add up. Couple this with the eagerness of the Linux group to pass around the software (pirate), it is just very hard to make money on Linux. Witness groups who try to create games for Linux and sell them.
    Back in the 8-bit day, game piracy was so bad on some platforms that the big game makers stopped writing/porting games to them because it wasn't worth the time (it cost them money to try to support those platforms). Some of those platforms died out before their "time" (before 8-bit systems were replaced by 16-bit and 32-bit systems).
    Until people can easily find good ways to make a profit on Linux, most, if not all, of the software will continue to be provided by hobbyists or other people who provide these services in their spare time. I know that I am greatful for the time/effort of these folks in providing the things I use, but many people just seem to want to know if they can get it for free. It's quite saddening.

  115. canadian release? by klparrot · · Score: 1

    I hope I'm safe in assuming that when the PS2 LinuxKit is available in the US, we'll be able to get it up here in Canada too. I mean, worst case scenario is that I have to get it thru a friend in the States (yay! no region issues), but has anyone heard if they're going to formally release it in all the Region 1 countries at once?

    1. Re:canadian release? by Mandoric · · Score: 2

      Ever look at a PS game case, and see the under the Playstation logo two boxes that say "NTSC" and "U/C"? As far as Sony's concerned, Canada is in the same software/hardware region as the US. Admittedly, you probably wouldn't see it on store shelves there, but seeing as it's direct-order anyway... =P

  116. PlayStation2 is dying by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    It is now official - IGN has confirmed: PlayStation2 is dying

    Yet another crippling bombshell hit the beleaguered PlayStation community when recently IGN confirmed that PlayStation2 accounts for less than a fraction of 1 percent of all consoles. Coming on the heels of the latest IGN survey which plainly states that PlayStation2 has lost more market share, this news serves to reinforce what we've known all along. PlayStation2 is collapsing in complete disarray, as further exemplified by failing dead last in the recent comprehensive gaming tests.

    You don't need to be a Kreskin to predict PlayStation2's future. The hand writing is on the wall: PlayStation2 faces a bleak future. In fact there won't be any future at all for PlayStation2 because PlayStation2 is dying. Things are looking very bad for PlayStation2. As many of us are already aware, PlayStation2 continues to lose market share. Red ink flows like a river of blood. In-house Sony projects are the most endangered of them all, having lost 93% of their core developers.

    Let's keep to the facts and look at the numbers.

    Sony leader Ken Kutaragi states that there are 7000 users of PlayStation2. How many users of Dreamcast are there? Let's see. The number of PlayStation2 versus Dreamcast posts on Usenet is roughly in ratio of 5 to 1. Therefore there are about 7000/5 = 1400 Dreamcast users. Saturn posts on Usenet are about half of the volume of Dreamcast posts. Therefore there are about 700 users of Saturn. A recent article put GameCube at about 80 percent of the console market. Therefore there are (7000+1400+700)*4 = 36400 GameCube users. This is consistent with the number of GameCube Usenet posts.

    Due to the troubles of Sega, abysmal sales and so on, Sega went out of business and was taken over by Microsoft who sell another troubled console. Now Microsoft is also dead, its corpse turned over to yet another charnel house.

    All major surveys show that PlayStation2 has steadily declined in market share. PlayStation2 is very sick and its long term survival prospects are very dim. If PlayStation2 is to survive at all it will be among OS hobbyist dabblers. PlayStation2 continues to decay. Nothing short of a miracle could save it at this point in time. For all practical purposes, PlayStation2 is dead.

  117. Affordable? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You do realise that a PlayStation 2 plus the Linux kit will run you at least $500 at this point (more than enough for a cheap athlon PC rig) right?

  118. Made some performance tweaks, here's the FAQ by Mr.+Spock · · Score: 1

    Many of the questions posed in the forum are answered in the FAQ at http://playstation2-linux.com/faq.php. I'll try to answer other questions as time allows, but I'm at LWCE today. Stop by and say Hi if you like, I'll be in the Sony booth. I've made some performance tweaks to the website, let's see if we can avoid slashdotting for a little longer...

  119. Good news for Linux by Sir+Homer · · Score: 1

    Linux is getting more corperate attension over the past 2 years. AOL-TW, IBM, and TiVO are among the compaines. Microsoft has even considered Linux a major threat to it's business. As someone said before, Sony is not violating the GPL at all, no argument. Even TiVo, a set-top box that you buy in a retail store, which actually runs linux, put out their source code.

  120. This is great, but... by drsir · · Score: 1

    what do people plan to do with it? Will people be able to make their own games and distribute them? If so, I'll buy one. I don't want to buy just to have linux on my ps2, I already have that on my pc.

  121. Re:ps2 by kz45 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Why do we want this again?

    I wonder how well emulation would work on a PS2 for systems like the N64,dreamcast, and or an X86 based PC?

  122. Re:Oh, come on. You know it's cool - HW lockout by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    "So Sony says the PS2 can't read anything but PS/PS2/DVD discs. Then get a usb CD drive and go to town."
    No, they say you can't read anything except PS2 disks unless you quit running Linux. If they took the effort to disable functionality like this, I doubt they'd miss something as obvious as a USB drive. They probably only support USB kbd and mouse.
  123. Doesn't this break the GPL? by ndogg · · Score: 1

    How can they do all that and not break the GPL?

    Unless everything boots off the HDD and all the source code is stored there as well and no DVDs/CDs are included, I can't see how they can do all that. Hiding the bootloader is easy, but hiding access to the CD/DVD-ROM drive will be difficult (without breaking the GPL, that is) unless you boot off the HDD.

    I think that if they do all that they say they will, RMS and GNU are going to have a fit.

    --
    // file: mice.h
    #include "frickin_lasers.h"
    1. Re:Doesn't this break the GPL? by betis70 · · Score: 1

      The GPL has not been tested in a court of law. I am sure Sony knows this. RMS and GNU are (honestly) insignificant next to the power of the Sony.

      --
      I forget...are we at war with Eurasia or East Asia?
    2. Re:Doesn't this break the GPL? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Give me a fucking break. Sony's in complete compliance with the GPL in this case; this has nothing to do with testing the GPL in court. Go see the FAQ and forums at the PlayStation2 Linux Community site for more information before letting the froth and spittle run down your chin.

  124. Hey Troll by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    IGN is dying not PS2 !!
    VF4 is soon coming out. That means big sales in Japan. How are XBox and GameCube going to counter that ?
    If PS2 dies then everybody must be dying.

    1. Re:Hey Troll by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Gamecube will counter that with good games, while Xbox will crush it. Physically.

  125. Linux for Playstation Ad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Now Linux can suck on your Playstation too"

  126. Nostalgia by Sprunkys · · Score: 1

    Just a little nostalgia
    Google gave me the following slashdot article/discussion

    --
    "We live in our minds, and existance is the attempt to bring that life into physical reality" Ayn Rand
  127. Re:Compulsory military service by galen22198 · · Score: 1

    As mentioned above, the President did not suggest compulsory military service. Rather, he asked us to volunteer 4000 hours or two years over our entire lifetime in volunteer work. That's hardly an errosion of freedom. Its also doesn't diminish human rights. Clearly, actually listening to, watching, or reading the speech is helpful in not making ludicrous claims regarding the "whole anti-terrorism" thing or the "exact losses of freedom" that you fail to specify.

  128. Flamebait? by uninet · · Score: 0

    Uh, no he didn't. He said that all Americans should serve two-years (4,000 hrs.) of community service. He said nothing about military service, nor manditory service.

    -Tim

    --
    -------------
    "You would not get a high grade for such a design" -- Andy Tanenbaum on Linus' Linux design.
  129. $199?? HAHAHA. by fire-eyes · · Score: 1

    $199 Dollars? Hah. Gimme a break. And I though paying for a Linux distro was just plain immoral.

    ONE HUDRED NINETY NINE??

    HEH!

    --
    -- Note: If you don't agree with me, don't bother replying. I won't read it.
    1. Re:$199?? HAHAHA. by shamino0 · · Score: 1

      Ummmm.... You are aware that this $199 includes a $40G hard drive, Ethernet card, mouse and keyboard, right? That's not really out of line with what it would cost to buy these separately.

  130. Just one word, that's all I have to say..ONE WORD. by Newer+Guy · · Score: 1

    wow. Thank you Mrs. Robinson.

  131. Cool! Now games will run better. by SIGFPE · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    I can't wait to get the stuff and play Final Fantasy X under Linux. Now that the PS2 has a real OS FFX will run much faster and crash less often. And with a preempting multitasking OS I'll be able to play Silent Hill 2 in another windows during the boring cut sequences FFX. This has to be the greatest thing that's happened in video games.

    --
    -- SIGFPE
  132. Why being so excited about this? by pinkpineapple · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I am not flaming just trying to understand after having read most of the feedbacks on /.

    Why being so excited about Sony putting up with Linux on PS2. Granted this will probably bring some visibility and increased credibility to the Linux OS (is it good and does it need that really?) The only positive thing is for Sony to get the eggs out of the golden goose, the same way as Red Hat does.

    They are the people behing DRM, DMCA, MPAA, and all the ugly things that EFF and other great folks (some of them slashdot readers) are fighting against. Come on, the company is evil, so why are the replies so enthusiastic about this?

    If some people just decide to turn to Linux because Sony supports it on their PS2, does the community really needs these people?

    I want to understand.

    PPA, the girl next door.

    --
    -- I feel better now. Thanks for asking.
    1. Re:Why being so excited about this? by ZaMoose · · Score: 2

      Actually, SCEA is a very different beast from the electronics and media divisions of Sony (the ones behind DMCA et al.). They tend to do what's good for SCEA, not really Sony at large.

      --
      I wish I had a kryptonite cross, because then you could keep Dracula and Superman away.
  133. ps2linuxkit.com message board by elskanko · · Score: 1

    we have setup a message board at http://ps2linuxkit.com more to come soon frank@ps2linuxkit.com

  134. Dreamcast will, though... by MsGeek · · Score: 2
    Still, the PS 2 has other copyright protection schemes built into its hardware that accomplish the same thing, namely no booting of burned games.

    Why fux0r around with PS2 when Dreamcast is $50 (if you can still find one!) and unless you get a machine made after September 2000 is totally and completely CD-R bootable? The ethernet adapter is expen$$$ive on eBay but it's not a must, particularly considering that the thing comes with a standard v90 Conexant controllerless modem. I suspect that the code at linmodems.org might kick it over.

    The main weakness of the DC is lack of hard drive. And of course that's a big weakness. However, there are tons of people playing around with not only Linux on DC but a new, open source OS specifically designed for DC game development called Kallisti!OS.

    Why support the Sony 3v1L 3mp1r3? Join Team Dreamcast!

    http://mc.pp.se/dc/
    http://dev.dcemulation.com/

    --
    Knowledge is power. Knowledge shared is power multiplied.
  135. copyright vs copy protection by FuzzyBad-Mofo · · Score: 1
    ..other copyright protection schemes built into its hardware..

    Nitpick:
    Copy protection is something which physically restricts the ability to copy.
    Copyright protection is a concept by which many lawyers keep themselves employed.

    Fuzzy

  136. What a shame... by lowe0 · · Score: 1

    I get the joke, and I ran out of mod points a week ago.

  137. I'm curious - why do you want this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It would seem that this is pretty expensive for a computer, one that is technically obtuse and underpowered compared to a homebuilt x86 compatible.
    Is the appeal just to see Linux running on another piece of hardware? If so, a $50 Dreamcast will do that without needing to pay for the distro too.
    Is the appeal to trick out your PS2? I understand that, although it seems a pretty small group would pay $200 for this.

    1. Re:I'm curious - why do you want this? by Alan+Partridge · · Score: 1

      technically obtuse and underpowered compared to what? the PS2's architecture is amazingly powerful in some ways - that parallel GFX is really pretty radical. And don't flatter yourself, you mean a homeASSEMBLED x86 compatible.

      --
      That was classic intercourse!
  138. Was I complaining? by twilight30 · · Score: 2
    I thought it was a pretty innocent question. I certainly wasn't complaining about Sony. I was just curious about the Debian port. And that's it.

    Some people need to relax and get the flamethrowers off their ass.

    --
    ========================================
    Death will come, and will have your eyes
    -- Pavese
  139. Customer demand by GPS+Pilot · · Score: 1

    this is exactly why Linux won't make it bigtime,- there's no money in it.

    Sorry, your argument doesn't hold up. There is less profit made selling a tube of toothpaste than a copy of Linux, but billions of tubes of toothpaste have been sold.

    While a computer company will make less money per Linux sale than per Windoze sale, the lower price means there would be a lot more customer demand for Linux than for Windoze. There would, if Linux had as many Joe-Sixpack-friendly apps, and if the OS itself was as friendly to Joe Sixpack. There, my friend, is exactly why Linux won't make it bigtime.

    --
    That that is is that that that that is not is not.
    1. Re:Customer demand by aka-ed · · Score: 1
      the lower price means there would be a lot more customer demand for Linux than for Windoze

      But the price for Linux is lower than the price for Windows, so where is all that customer demand?

      Demand for operating systems can be no higher than the number of computers; and, within the existing number of computers, no higher than the number of users who are dissatisfied with their current operating system (by default: Windows). Pricing doesn't matter one damn bit if no one is in the market for an OS.

      Since Windows does do most everything Joe Sixpack can imagine doing (even if not elegantly or well), there is no demand, nor does it seem likely there ever will be.

      --
      I survived the Dick Cheney Presidency 7 to 9 AM 7-21-07
    2. Re:Customer demand by GPS+Pilot · · Score: 1

      You didn't read my post.

      I said Linux' lower price means there would be a lot of demand for it, if Linux had as many Joe-Sixpack-friendly apps as Windows, and if the OS itself was as friendly to Joe Sixpack.

      --
      That that is is that that that that is not is not.
  140. DTV as sharp as VGA? by GPS+Pilot · · Score: 1

    Maybe you would know: how does the sharpness of a DTV compare to a typical VGA monitor? Do they release dot-pitch specs for DTVs?

    --
    That that is is that that that that is not is not.
  141. wrong direction for Sony by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sony is wasting their money on a dying operating
    system. They should see the non-existent turnout
    at LinuxWorld. Linux was just another flash in
    the pan.

    1. Re:wrong direction for Sony by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nobody was there because they knew you were coming. After you left the place filled up.

  142. Re:ps2 by Digital11 · · Score: 1

    Read much? You can't use the TV-out on the PS2 when you're in Linux mode... It requires a computer monitor.

    --
    I am a leaf on the wind. Watch how I soar.
  143. Japanese expression that doesn't translate well... by nyet · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The "entertainment lifestyle" phrase is a very common one in Japanese marketing. It doesn't translate well into US marketing speak, so it feels a bit disengenous to non-Japanese.

    Just one of those things people take for granted, since cultural identity has long been substituted by marketing techniques... not just in the US, but everywhere.

  144. Actually, it did make a difference by Cardinal · · Score: 3, Insightful

    You may have missed it, but the kit includes two DVD's, one of which is all the sources.

    I don't know about you, but I don't recall hearing about Windows shipping with a source CD.

    The fact that Sony's charging for it is not the point of the GPL. The point is that even though they're charging for it, they still have to release the source. The GPL has never been against selling software.

  145. Imagine a beowulf cluster of these... by suprslackr420 · · Score: 1

    somebody had to say it.

    --
    ubi dubium ibi libertas.
  146. Python for Playstation 2 by JasonAsbahr · · Score: 1

    I've just made a patch available today which allows Python to compile for and run on the PS2.

    Python-2.1 for PS2

    This should also work on the Sony Linux system, but now I have a great excuse to spend $200 and find out... ;-)

  147. Re:well, here's the truth... by Spyffe · · Score: 1

    Good heavens, I think now hell can freeze over.
    JonKatz has posted as an AC.

    --
    Sigmentation fault - core dumped
  148. Re:Don't forget by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What are you, French?

    Anyway.. don't forget the Canadians!!

  149. Re:Compulsory military service by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Fuck you.

    Don't you dare fucking speak for those who died on that day. Against anti-terrorism? Maybe we should replay those fucking 9-11 tapes to remind you of how vulnerable we REALLY are, despite being a global powerhouse.

    You're probably a fat-ass lazy shit-faced pussy who'll probably cry the moment you have to go out into the field. Don't believe in anti-terrorism? You can use your freedom to fuck your mom.

    Take your selfrighteous attitude elsewhere. It's nice that you were actually "thinking recently." Try to do it more often. You dumb fuck.

  150. Playstation 2 sucks some serious arse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The playstation 2 is possibly the worst designed console ever released ever ever ever.

    The fact that it can now run Linux doesnt change that. Its just a flimsy method of keeping people interested in attempting to design for the damn thing.

    Can the Playstation 2 owners say antialiasing?

    I hope this terrible, TERRIBLE attempt at keeping this horrific console alive fails.
    Though God knows it wont with the eternally stupid Playstation 2 crowd.

    1. Re:Playstation 2 sucks some serious arse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      While I agree with you about the PS2 being really horrible, I think SCEA should make every effort to keep it alive. By which I mean, of course, giving me one for free with a copy of FFX and GTA3 and then VANISHING THE HELL OFF THE FACE OF THE PLANET. I hope that made my "keep it alive" comment clear.

  151. Re:COME ON /.'ERS!!! JUMP IN!!! by Gizzmonic · · Score: 1
    If the XBOX is a PC, what does this make the PS2?

    Well, troll, it's not like Sony is trying to bruteforce its way into your living room by selling boxes at a loss. The Linux kit is a nod to hobbyists; one that will undoubtedly score Sony some cash and maybe even encourage independent game development on the PS2.

    The XBOX by itself is cheaper, but it seems to be illegal to run Linux on it, (since that apparently requires "circumventing copyright protections") at least in the US.

    --
    (-1, Raw and Uncut is the only way to read)
  152. Re:FFX by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    FFX Crashes?
    Sorry, never happened to me. You must have a bad PS2.

  153. Re:Affordable? Your point is exactly my point by fferreres · · Score: 0

    Yes, and that is exactly what i argue in my post.

    It's not affordable nor easy to setup and it's not for the average family. Hence it DOESN'T make much sense for Sony to do this and thus my post. What WOULD make sense is trying to bundle a console that has is Linux ready from day 1 at an affordable price and that you only need a monitor or TV. Sony alone can do that.

    A system based on Unix that can compete in price and leverage what's already in the public domain for everything non-game. A massive home system for the family, a la X-Box.

    --
    unfinished: (adj.)
  154. Re:Question - Answer by Kris_J · · Score: 1
    Sitting here browsing the web on a Sony 21" Trinitron monitor I picked up NEW for A$800 (~US$400) I pretty much love Sony all the time. I'm also a big fan of Logitech for their cordless keyboard and mouse and Ikea for their faux-leather reclining chairs. I'd post a photo, but I'm not wearing a shirt.

    Also, not having a DVD player (or an Aibo) and not caring if movies and music are crap or not I find it hard to really hate them. I might even pickup a PS2 secondhand or on sale or something one day soon.

  155. Re:FFX by SIGFPE · · Score: 2
    If it never crashes under Linux then it'll crash less than 1% of the time it crashes normally.


    Good game BTW. You finished it yet?

    --
    -- SIGFPE
  156. Mod chip sales by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You realize that Mod Chip sales are going to go through the roof with this one. People are not going to sit idle being able only to run the custom linux that Sony produces. I am sure that there are many people out there that would like to access the GS directly as well as tweak the kernel for better performance and maybe add support for more USB / 1394 peripherals.

    Lets see. If you can put 2 USB broadband adaptors on it, you could make a PS2 router. What fun!

  157. sgi monitors by harper4 · · Score: 1

    so, aren't my old SGI and SUN monitors sync on green? Meaning, I should be able to use those 21 inch mothertruckers with the ps2?

  158. OK. I give. Why is this a good thing? by Sans_A_Cause · · Score: 1

    Why, other than the "gosh, wow" factor would anyone want to develop any linux software for PS2? You can count the number of interesting linux games on one hand, so it can't be "porting of games". I could imagine a cheapo beowulf cluster (not THE troll; that's farther down)--seriously, a cluster at $200/node would be great. But, if you have to add another $200 in hardware per node, now you're up in the ballpark of a cheap x86/PPC cluster.

    I do think it would be neat to fill out a purchase order for 32 PS2's. I bet the call from accounting would come in about 10 seconds after they got the P.O. request.

  159. Re:well, here's the truth... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't have a problem with Windows, I kinda like it and use it as much as I use some of my other OSes. My only beef with windows is that it has allowed people who do not consider themselves "computer people" to use computers. This was okay when it was confined to the relativly small Mac market, but it has exploded. My dad who can't type bought a computer and couldn't give me a strait answer when I asked him why he wanted it. If this sounds elitist it is. Drink wine if you appreciate the vintage. Drive a car if you can change the oil. Go to a museum if you admire art. But this whole buy a computer cause it will make your life better somehow? *sigh*

  160. Re:OK. I give. Why is this a good thing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    can count the number of interesting linux games on one hand

    Porting these games would increase the PS2's good gaming library five-fold.

  161. Update: It does.... sorta by jmorris42 · · Score: 1

    Ok, found a FAQ where Sony sez we get access, but through a closed source layer that will enforce their silly rules so no CDs (burned or not) allowed. So perhaps a modchip will fix things?

    --
    Democrat delenda est
  162. Re:Compulsory military service by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You're stupid, and this whole thread is totally OT. Sit down and shut up, unless you have something(useful and interesting) to say about the actual topic of this thread.

  163. Re:ps2 by kidblast · · Score: 1

    I have a feeling that after this is released the most popular software to be produced by hobbyist coders will be an "erotic massager" app. This whole thing is a ploy for people to do this, then wear out their controllers, and have to pony up dough for new ones.

  164. Am I missing something? by kamapuaa · · Score: 1

    Through looking through the FAQ and what people have posted, this distro will NOT allow people to develop games that work on the TV for PS2...not to mention, the ability to make games that will play on your friend's PS2. I'm sure it'll get hacked so you can copy games, but you'd still need the linux distro...

    I'm very surprised Sony brings this out, for two reasons:

    1) There is no good legitamite reason to own this. As a computer, Linux on a PS2 is something like Linux on the old computer you keep in the attic, except it has weird limitations. The only reason to own this is in anticipation of some hacker figuring a way to play copied games off the HD.

    2) Reasons of punditry. Even without paying too much attention to the video game machines, I know Sony marketing is criticizing the XBox as a modified computer, rather than a video game system (which makes no sense to me, but I hear people repeat the charge so much on /., maybe it's true). Having Linux running on a PS2 just exposes how shallow that criticism is.

    Maybe I'm just missing something - as it is, I don't understand why Sony would do this, or why anybody would be hyped about it.

    Kamapuaa

    --
    Slashdot: providing anti-social weirdos a soapbox, since 1997.
  165. Re:Compulsory military service by MjDascombe · · Score: 1

    How is this not off topic?

  166. Did anyone else notice this? by Alan+Partridge · · Score: 1

    "the Linux operating system marketshare is expected to reach 38 percent worldwide by 2004." I definitely want some of what these guys are smokin'. Surely even the most rabid linux fantasist doesn't REALLY expect a 40% market share in two years? History might prove me wrong, but no-way, no-how. I want to believe but...

    --
    That was classic intercourse!
  167. Kinda takes the fun out of it by Kizzle · · Score: 1

    I think that the more people that support Linux the better, but isn't this taking the fun out of hacking your console?

  168. Re:Plenty of GFLOPS by Ice+Tiger · · Score: 2

    Nice for numerical solutions to problems, i.e. Computational Fluid Dynamics. Hmm seem to recall seeing a Cray YMP was 2 GFLOPS, gives a contrast doesn't it. :)

    --
    "Because we are not employing at entry level, offshoring will kill our industry stone dead."
  169. wow by DaiSai · · Score: 1

    where/when can i buy one, as mentioned before the hardware alone would be worth 199 usd.

  170. If the PS2 has Linux... by Spam808 · · Score: 1

    What about the Xbox? It already has the Ethernet port, hard drive and all. Throw together a keyboard, mouse and DVD with Linux on it, and you could sell it for about $75 (yeah, it might be a bit high, but it's Microsoft, right?).

    --
    "I get my jollies building computers" Steve Jobs, 1983
  171. Re:Japanese expression that doesn't translate well by Squeeze+Truck · · Score: 2

    A better translation would be "redefining entertainment."

    --

    "Reactionaries must be deprived of the right to voice their opinions; only the people have that right." - Mao