Systemd is a tool, not just a project. Systemd as a tool tries to do many different things, and it does many if not all poorly. You may not need all of the components to work but you need several, such as binary logging that you cannot disable.
He says it does not break the UNIX philosophy because everything is in the same code base purposely ignoring that it does not do one thing and do it well. He was creating a strawman.
No, you cannot "just turn that off" when using syslog you still have to have the "new way" there to redirect to the "old way". Sure you may not keep the binary logs, supposedly, but the overhead is still there.
Then I am not "sicking with the old way of logging" and I cannot freely chose what software to use. I am stuck with binary logging and just pushing it to text logging after the fact.
However there are a lot of places where you can charge an all electric vehicle for free. How many places can you get your diesel for free? That will drive down the cost of ownership.
Way to create a false dilemma. I dont pirate anything, yet I support net neutrality 100%. The cable operator I pay for an internet connection should not determine who/where I go to. I pay for a connection and if they want to oversell the connection that is something they have to deal with.4
But This is happening in the "conservative, state's rights, tea party wing" areas, such as Texas more than the other area. In fact the "minority" group there is much much worse at subverting the constitution.
Ahh Mr Sues, now you are adding stuff not in there. It does not say rights.. It says privileges and immensities.
Even still you are incorrect.
Amendment 5
No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a grand jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the militia, when in actual service in time of war or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offense to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.
No PERSON
Amendment 1
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.[1]
Of the people.
The others are the same. It does not say citizen, and it has been interpreted to not mean citizen. So unless you are claiming better qualifications than the SCOTUS, you are definitely wrong.
Are you trying to make a distinction? The antigun liberals dont think people should have the right to guns, not that one group should have the right and the other should not. Your attack fails because there is no analogy here.
The Bill of Rights is extended to state governments by the 14th amendment, which says:
No state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law
So yeah, you're simply wrong. The Consitution applies only due process applies to non-citizens. The first, second, fourth, and fifth amendments, at least are protected for "citizens of the United States". People here illegally are entitled to due process, a hearing, before they are nailed or their property is taken. Other than that, they are intruders and have about the same rights as someone who broke into your home. Legal immigrants are guests in the country and you can think about the difference in rights between a guest you invite into your home versus you in your own home. Only one of two is allowed to touch the thermostat, or go upstairs.
it says any PERSON, not any CITIZEN.. So he is correct, you are wrong.
Slashdot Mirror
His argument does not address the argument. It creates a strawman that claiming the argument is that the code is not stored in the same repo.
Systemd is a tool, not just a project. Systemd as a tool tries to do many different things, and it does many if not all poorly. You may not need all of the components to work but you need several, such as binary logging that you cannot disable.
He says it does not break the UNIX philosophy because everything is in the same code base purposely ignoring that it does not do one thing and do it well. He was creating a strawman.
No, you cannot "just turn that off" when using syslog you still have to have the "new way" there to redirect to the "old way". Sure you may not keep the binary logs, supposedly, but the overhead is still there.
Then I am not "sicking with the old way of logging" and I cannot freely chose what software to use. I am stuck with binary logging and just pushing it to text logging after the fact.
What is wrong with supervisord? Why does it need to be integrated so tightly with init? why does it need binary logging as its only option?
Why would the bias of someone matter you ask?
I can chose not to have the binary logger?
I am talking legit places. My work has lots of spots designated for EVs with multi hour limits on them for charging.
Also what you claim will get you sued.
Yea, screw the free market, follow the restrictions the republicans put in place to competition.
However there are a lot of places where you can charge an all electric vehicle for free. How many places can you get your diesel for free? That will drive down the cost of ownership.
Way to create a false dilemma. I dont pirate anything, yet I support net neutrality 100%. The cable operator I pay for an internet connection should not determine who/where I go to. I pay for a connection and if they want to oversell the connection that is something they have to deal with.4
On average, consumers would pay an additional $67 for landline broadband, and $72 for mobile broadband each year,
I dont mind this. Especially since it will help others who do not have broadband now.
its only 7 days into the year, I dont smell that bad, lets give it another 3 weeks before you bully me.
There is nothing consistent about Christianity. As a former Christian it is a bunch of hypocrisy.
But it is also easy to forget that things like the southern democrats basically switching sides and what it did to the parties.
But This is happening in the "conservative, state's rights, tea party wing" areas, such as Texas more than the other area. In fact the "minority" group there is much much worse at subverting the constitution.
Actually it kinda does. The ability to constantly abuse the system means there is a massive flaw in said system.
Ahh Mr Sues, now you are adding stuff not in there. It does not say rights.. It says privileges and immensities.
Even still you are incorrect.
Amendment 5
No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a grand jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the militia, when in actual service in time of war or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offense to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.
No PERSON
Amendment 1
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.[1]
Of the people.
The others are the same. It does not say citizen, and it has been interpreted to not mean citizen. So unless you are claiming better qualifications than the SCOTUS, you are definitely wrong.
The make of their tools was not in question.
Why would they? Governments in the EU is relativity similar, politics in North and Central America is vastly dissimilar, some completely opposite.
Are you trying to make a distinction? The antigun liberals dont think people should have the right to guns, not that one group should have the right and the other should not. Your attack fails because there is no analogy here.
The Bill of Rights is extended to state governments by the 14th amendment, which says:
No state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law
So yeah, you're simply wrong. The Consitution applies only due process applies to non-citizens. The first, second, fourth, and fifth amendments, at least are protected for "citizens of the United States". People here illegally are entitled to due process, a hearing, before they are nailed or their property is taken. Other than that, they are intruders and have about the same rights as someone who broke into your home. Legal immigrants are guests in the country and you can think about the difference in rights between a guest you invite into your home versus you in your own home. Only one of two is allowed to touch the thermostat, or go upstairs.
it says any PERSON, not any CITIZEN.. So he is correct, you are wrong.
Umm, they did not have a couthouse, because they did not have permanant structures generally, but they had laws and standards of a civilization.
Government agencies dont consider manpower to be a cost in some cases.