However, in the case of Web based voting, you could design the system such that any person could go back and recast their vote later (at any time until the final deadline).
This way, even though you are forced to vote for a candidate against your will, you can go back and change it later.
This is could of course also be the case for a terminal based voting system, in which votes are encrypted/signed using asymmetric cryptography.
One possible approach which solves some of these issues is outlined in this Norwegian research paper:
Slashdot Mirror
However, in the case of Web based voting, you could design the system such that any person could go back and recast their vote later (at any time until the final deadline).
This way, even though you are forced to vote for a candidate against your will, you can go back and change it later.
This is could of course also be the case for a terminal based voting system, in which votes are encrypted/signed using asymmetric cryptography.
One possible approach which solves some of these issues is outlined in this Norwegian research paper:
Finally! A Slashdot story where the ever-present whatcouldpossiblygowrong tag actually makes sense.
No, it's actually the norwegian word describinig a dish consisting of dried codfish prepared in a potash lye.