Slashdot Mirror


New 4100 Lumen Flashlight Can Set Things On Fire

i4u writes "Engadget is reporting that Wicked Lasers has introduced The Torch. It is the world's brightest and most powerful flashlight. The Flashlight is capable of melting plastic, lighting paper on fire within seconds, and if you like, fry an egg or a marshmallow on a stick. At 4100 lumens, The Torch is 100 lumens more powerful than The Polarion Helios, the former most powerful flashlight, and retails for around $300. The Torch is apparently also undergoing review at the Guinness Book of World Records."

464 comments

  1. Campfires! by San-LC · · Score: 5, Funny

    It would make campfire storytelling even more interesting! "Here's the tale of the man whose face melted off, oooOoooOoohhh AGHH MY FACE IS FALLING OFF!" Subsequently, many camp counselors have crapped their pants at the mere thought.

    1. Re:Campfires! by phillips321 · · Score: 1

      more importantly imagine how easy fire lighting would be if u had this. no need for a flint!
      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TsV3-IvS8UA
      or u could just take a lighter, but what would be the fun in that?

    2. Re:Campfires! by SleepyJoe · · Score: 1

      Sweet ... now I can strap one of these on my car, pointing backwards, and switch it on, and voila ... photon propulsion.

    3. Re:Campfires! by EmotionToilet · · Score: 1, Interesting

      If they could combine this bright of a light with the technology in the flashlights that charge themselves when you shake them and move the magnet back and forth, you'd have a really useful device for survival in the wild. It would be an endless amount of fire starting energy and could come in handy for signaling planes/helicopters for help and getting around in the woods at night.

    4. Re:Campfires! by livewire98801 · · Score: 1

      Point it at the cop pulling you over at night. . . and report back to us here :)

      --
      "He may be mad, but there's method in his madness. [...] It's what drives men mad, being methodical." G.K.Chesterton
    5. Re:Campfires! by tylernt · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Sweet ... now I can strap one of these on my car, pointing backwards,
      Me too, but I want to flick it on whenever an SUV pulls up behind my car at night and fries my retinas with their high-mounted headlights.

      Revenge is a dish that is best served cold, but this would work pretty well too.
      --
      DRM 'manages access' in the same way that a prison 'manages freedom'
    6. Re:Campfires! by sumdumass · · Score: 1

      What are you doing looking into their headlights in the first place? There is a night selector on most rear view mirrors and often, just adjusting the side view mirrors slightly out gets rid of the problem there too.

      Just remember, if you start doing this and cause an accident, you could be responsible for it. But more importantly, there is going to be some SUV driving slashdoter who will have it mounted in th front to blind you back or to blind on coming traffic that is too stupid to dim their lights. What this is, is a fancy way of saying, you fight them, they will fight back, in the end, you will just have to adjust your mirrors or buy a larger vehicle. You might as well skip the hassle and get to business.

    7. Re:Campfires! by bobstay · · Score: 4, Funny

      Maybe you have the muscles in your right arm to pump away at that torch for 48 hours straight, but most of us haven't had quite that much practice.

    8. Re:Campfires! by chiui · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Have you a night selector on lateral mirrors too? Ever tried driving at night on the speedway with SUVs trying to overtake you (slowly of course because they SUCK (in every possible way) at moderate/high speed), and all your mirrors reflecting too much light at you? I often have to use the left hand to block the excessive light from the left mirror! If you have to darken every mirror to not getting blinded they become useless. And don't tell me to buy an higher car or we're gonna to drive our vehicles with periscopes soon :P SUVs are wrong. Period.

      --
      Moderation is overrated.
    9. Re:Campfires! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Considering that there are flashlights around using H4 halogen bulbs around I can't see that this is really something to come up with...


      It shall also be noted that the Lumen value is depending on the reflector and direction of the light, while the intensity of a bulb is in candela.

    10. Re:Campfires! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      right arm ... pump away ... for 48 hours straight, but most of us haven't had quite that much practice. You must be new here.
    11. Re:Campfires! by sumdumass · · Score: 1

      Yea, I am saying that you can turn the left mirror out a tad bit while driving at night on the expressway and avoid most of the problems your mentioning.

      And yes, I have been in that situation before. I have found that clean mirrors and windows help enormously so if you find they are a little dirty, check if there is a small different after cleaning them.

      SUVs aren't wrong for the reasons you mention. You probably have over sensitive eyes which is hardely the fault of the SUV or the SUV driver. I had the same issue a while back and fixed it with those minor changes. At night you don't need a precise view of the side of your car while driving down the road, you need to see if lights are in the lane beside you so you can maneuver but your not parallel parking on the freeway. Darkening the mirrors at night don't make them useless for these reasons. If there is something stopping you from making minor adjustments, that is hardly the fault of the SUV or it's driver.

      I drive a very large truck most of the time now. I still have my corolla which is a small compact like you describe driving yourself. I have no problem driving it at night and usually take it when I'm going to be on a freeway because of the fuel savings. I'm not a stranger to your plight, I just don't complain because I know tricks that make it a non issue and was attempting to pass it on to you.

  2. Omg by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    It pumps out so much light that there is a recoil when you switch it on!

    1. Re:Omg by Arthur+B. · · Score: 5, Informative

      about 2.10^-8 Newton per steradian

      (4100/683/c)

      --
      \u262D = \u5350
    2. Re:Omg by bar-agent · · Score: 5, Funny

      This flashlight had better make a sound like "bwwOOOWWWWMMMmmmm" when you turn it on.

      --
      i'd hit it so hard, if you pulled me out you'd be the king of britain [bash.org]
    3. Re:Omg by Random+BedHead+Ed · · Score: 5, Funny

      The metric system is the tool of the devil. My flashlight gets forty rods to the hogshead, and that's the way I likes it!

    4. Re:Omg by mpe · · Score: 1

      It pumps out so much light that there is a recoil when you switch it on!

      How much of it's output is actually visible light though?

    5. Re:Omg by gallwapa · · Score: 1

      ...omg indeed. I was LOL at the first comment, then I read this one and began crying. absolutely hilarious

    6. Re:Omg by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Yeah but how many laptop football fields is that?

    7. Re:Omg by rasputin465 · · Score: 4, Funny

      This flashlight had better make a sound like "bwwOOOWWWWMMMmmmm" when you turn it on.

      Give it to your neighbor's son and say,

      "Your father wanted you to have this when you were old enough, but your uncle wouldn't allow it."

      "Why wouldn't my uncle allow it?"

      "Because you can burn your arm off with this."

      "COOL!"

    8. Re:Omg by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unfortunately not very much even in that lesser devil, imperial units.

      (For those too lazy to click the link, Google tells us:

      1 rods per hogshead = 4.96031746 × 10-5 miles per gallon )

    9. Re:Omg by Akhiris · · Score: 1

      The ultimate in self defense! No need for mace!

    10. Re:Omg by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      This flashlight had better make a sound like "bwwOOOWWWWMMMmmmm" when you turn it on.

      That's an extra $149.95

    11. Re:Omg by snickkers · · Score: 1

      I did some deep research, and found out the answer to your question. 4100 lumens. (correct me if I'm wrong, but lumens is a measure of visible light? Wikipedia says "perceived" light)

      --
      GLORX 3:16
    12. Re:Omg by History's+Coming+To · · Score: 1

      Exactly, it's very easy to put out a load of IR - the real headline should be "Word's most inefficient torch".

      --
      Please consider this account deleted, I just can't be bothered with the spam anymore.
    13. Re:Omg by sumdumass · · Score: 1

      What is 4100 lumens in candle power? I have a 25 million candle power light and would like to replace it with this if it is close.

    14. Re:Omg by andphi · · Score: 1

      "He was afraid you might follow old Obi-Wan on another damnfool idealistic crusade. Or accidentally take your protocol Droid's head off."

    15. Re:Omg by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, it makes a sound like pSHHHEWWWWW!

  3. Excellent (taps fingertips together) by $RANDOMLUSER · · Score: 1, Funny

    Won't be long before we have phasers.

    --
    No folly is more costly than the folly of intolerant idealism. - Winston Churchill
    1. Re:Excellent (taps fingertips together) by eviloverlordx · · Score: 1

      We just need to buy a few of these, then build a ship around them. I hear Enterprise is a good name...

      --
      'Loose' is when your pants are three sizes too big. 'Lose' is when you misuse 'loose'.
    2. Re:Excellent (taps fingertips together) by Enlightenment · · Score: 1

      Turns out you can actually peel paint with just an LED flashlight and the lens from a DVD burner. The future is now!

  4. warning labels by LM741N · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Last time I bought an extension cord it had 4 different warning labels I had to take off. I wonder how many warning labels this flashlight will carry?
    Welcome to the Nanny Nation.

    1. Re:warning labels by riseoftheindividual · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I wish it was only warning labels. After reading TFA and watching that video, all I could think was "I better order before it's banned". Nanny nation indeed.

      --
      Patriot - A fan of expanding government power and spending while not wanting to pay higher taxes.
    2. Re:warning labels by apathy+maybe · · Score: 5, Insightful

      What the fuck? Why shouldn't it have a shit load of warning labels? I can understand you complaining about an extension cord (though seriously, some people are stupid enough to need them), but a light that can burn shit?

      It is fucking dangerous! Maybe you think that chainsaws shouldn't have warning labels as well? "Mummy what happens if I do this? Ahhhhhhhhhhhh" (though actually, all the chainsaws I've handled recently have quite good safety features).

      --
      I wank in the shower.
    3. Re:warning labels by Pojut · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I'm sorry to tell you this, but the reason that extension cord you bought had 4 different warning labels on it was because of morons that do something completely stupid, and then blame the manufacturer for not having a warning label telling you not to do it.

      "Hey! There was nothing that said it was dangerous to chew on the cord while it was plugged in! Nor was their anything telling me I shouldn't plug a coffee pot, a space heater, and a PS3 onto the same cord! I should sue their asses!"

      The above example may be a tad bit extreme (actually, it may not be...) but that is why those labels are there. If the company's lawyers could think of someone suing them over something, they would be stupid to not put a warning label on the product. Seeing as so many people would sue over so many little things (but NEVER over their own stupidity), a large number of labels go onto everyday products. Blame your fellow citizens for that gripe.

    4. Re:warning labels by ThinkingInBinary · · Score: 1

      Nor was their anything telling me I shouldn't plug a coffee pot, a space heater, and a PS3 onto the same cord!

      Er, that's a legitimate warning label to have. Why shouldn't it warn you against plugging in too many high-power devices? I mean, you can't expect people to intuit how many things they can or can't plug in, so why not say "Do not plug in more than ___ Amps (or ___ Watts) into this cord!"

    5. Re:warning labels by pla · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Why shouldn't it have a shit load of warning labels?

      Well, because anyone paying $300 for the world's brightest flashlight didn't buy it just so they can find their way to the electric panel after a breaker blows. They bought it because it can melt plastic. Thus, telling them as much merely insults us all, rather than providing any potential safety to the end user.

      Warning labels don't protect those of us with two neurons to rub together; They keep people in the gene pool who Darwin-the-Lifeguard needs to toss out ASAP.

    6. Re:warning labels by jayhawk88 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      So let me get this straight: A company is building a device that can literally set things on fire with visible light, built to almost exactly duplicate the form, shape, and function of the traditional flashlight, a device that after ~100 years is nearly universally recognized and known to be relatively harmless. And you think that it should not come with a warning label of some kind?

    7. Re:warning labels by Pojut · · Score: 1

      I'm not saying that it shouldn't, I'm saying that it shouldn't have to. It should be common sense not to put that many high-draw devices on a single, whimpy cord.

      At least, that's what they tell everyone that has been in elementary school for any length of time...

    8. Re:warning labels by Ultra64 · · Score: 5, Funny

      It is fucking dangerous! Maybe you think that chainsaws shouldn't have warning labels as well?

      Of course they shouldn't. If someone is so brain damaged that they can't figure out that a SAW can hurt them, why shouldn't they suffer the consequences?

      You can't protect stupid people from themselves, and you shouldn't try. It just encourages the spread of stupidity among the general population.
    9. Re:warning labels by gnick · · Score: 1

      There was nothing that said it was dangerous to chew on the cord while it was plugged in! A bit off-topic, but I'll burn a little karma. I can personally testify that putting a hot phone-line across your tongue is very unpleasant. (Combination of having the bad habit of stripping wires with my teeth and being flaky enough to have forgotten that I'd plugged the line in in the other room to gauge length.) I did, however, have the good taste to sue neither the phone company nor the manufacturer of the reel of phone cable.

      I'd hate to think that I'm part of the reason all of those warnings are on there...
      --
      He's getting rather old, but he's a good mouse.
    10. Re:warning labels by MightyMartian · · Score: 1

      There are some dangers to extension cords that people aren't aware of. Everyone knows about using them after they've been damaged (ie, exposed wiring, broken-off ground plugs, etc.), but I'm amazed at the number of people that will use two or three fifty footers, risking damage to their electrical equipment, or more ominously, people that use low amp-rated cords with large-draw devices, and actually risking overheating and possibly fire.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    11. Re:warning labels by shawn(at)fsu · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Well it does kind of look like a regular mag lite at least looking at the picture on TFA. If it does look like a normal flashlight one would hope it has a warning not for the buyer but for the safety of others where it is kept.

      --
      500 dollar reward for tip(s) leading to the arrest of the person(s) who stole my sig.
    12. Re:warning labels by Chirs · · Score: 1

      I don't know where you buy extension cords, but most of the ones I've seen *are* rated in terms of amps or watts. If they're not, then look at the wire guage that will be stamped or molded into the casing--generally for shorter distances #12 is good for 20A, #14 can handle 15A, and #16 can take 13A. For the really paranoid, drop those ratings down one step (so #12 for 15A) and you'll be laughing.

    13. Re:warning labels by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 1

      5 warning labels, if you count the package of "do not eat's" that always seem to come along.

      --

      --
      "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
    14. Re:warning labels by Pojut · · Score: 4, Funny

      Don't take this the wrong way, but that sounded EXACTLY like something my Dad would say.

      "So I'm sitting there, installing this new valve for a toilet...everything is going great, until I turn the water back on, twist the new valve open and realize that I didn't put any sealing tape on the threads. So water is flying everywhere, right? I quickly shut off the valve, and proceed to stand up to go back downstairs to shut off the water. Up I go, on my feet...down I go, on my back. Floors are slippery when they are wet. Don't forget that."

    15. Re:warning labels by EMeta · · Score: 2, Funny

      I would really appreciate it if all my extension cords were clearly labeled for recommended maximum voltage. I mean, sure I can figure I shouldn't put on too much, but knowing that figure each time I use it would be handy.

    16. Re:warning labels by pla · · Score: 1

      Er, that's a legitimate warning label to have

      A legitimate risk does not make for a legitimate warning label. Anything that falls into the "mind-numbingly obvious" category should not need a warning label.


      Why shouldn't it warn you against plugging in too many high-power devices

      Because each of those annoying little tags wastes the end-user's money, as well as the time it takes to cut them all off.


      I mean, you can't expect people to intuit how many things they can or can't plug in

      Why not? I'll admit I consider most people abysmally stupid, but they should have a pretty good grasp of the idea that you can't safely run a 20ga 100ft cord from your basement to your garage "beer fridge".

    17. Re:warning labels by Alsee · · Score: 1
      My hair dryer warning label says everything short of:

      Caution: Do not use with wet hair
      -
      --
      - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
    18. Re:warning labels by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 2, Funny

      built to almost exactly duplicate the form, shape, and function of the traditional flashlight

      do you realize that in some countries, they call that a torch ?

      I traveled to australia and when in a taxi, the driver asked me to open his glove box and hand him a torch. I was horrified! until I opened the box to see 'only' a flashlight there. "will this do?" "yeah, that's what I just asked you for".

      really. they call them that 'down there'.

      so why not *really* make a torch out of it? the name is already in place.

      --

      --
      "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
    19. Re:warning labels by GrievousMistake · · Score: 3, Funny

      We have updated the entry a little. It now says "Mostly harmless."

      --
      In a fair world, refrigerators would make electricity.
    20. Re:warning labels by FleaPlus · · Score: 3, Funny

      "Please do not shine flashlight into remaining face"

    21. Re:warning labels by pla · · Score: 5, Insightful

      one would hope it has a warning not for the buyer but for the safety of others where it is kept.

      Quiz time - You just bought a cool black anodized aluminum high-powered flashlight, with a huge ugly orange sticker on the handle warning you not to look at the beam. Do you:

      A) Have the warning professionally engraved directly onto the barrel of the flashlight, so it can never wear off,
      B) Remove that sucker before you even put in the batteries,
      C) Leave the sticker alone, ruining the look of your new toy, or
      D) Take it back to the store and ask for one with a more permanantly-affixed label?

    22. Re:warning labels by syukton · · Score: 5, Insightful

      They keep people in the gene pool who Darwin-the-Lifeguard needs to toss out ASAP.

      People like the child/wife/friend/visitor who picks up this neat little flashlight and, while remarking "I hate these maglite knock-offs" proceeds to permanently blind themselves?

      As another commenter pointed out, you can't use the design and form-factor of a harmless device when packaging an extremely dangerous device, because you will confuse and possibly harm people unintentionally. Would you package rat poison to look like candy bars or perhaps like a nice slice of deliciously moist cake? Warning labels protect people. They may not serve to protect the buyer of a given device, because they generally tend to know what they're buying and what it's used/not used for; but it can serve to protect somebody unfamiliar with the device, somebody who may happen upon it by random chance. If I owned one of these lights, I would have a sticker on it that said "DO NOT POINT AT FACE. EVER. SRSLY."

      --
      Reinvent the wheel only at either a lower cost, greater effectiveness, or your own personal enrichment and satisfaction.
    23. Re:warning labels by TheSpengo · · Score: 1

      Why shouldn't it have warning labels? Haha, it's called social darwinism! I am in favor of the removal of all safety labels.

      --
      Weaksauce as they say...
    24. Re:warning labels by ThePeices · · Score: 1

      "Blame your fellow citizens for that gripe."
      How about blaming a judicial system that actually lets people sue over the slightest perceived inconvenience, and which actually lets them win said lawsuit. Those who can, do....those who cant, sue.

    25. Re:warning labels by RalphSleigh · · Score: 5, Funny

      Nerd card. Now.

      --
      Come as you are, do what you must, be who you will.
    26. Re:warning labels by gnick · · Score: 4, Funny

      No offense taken - Hopefully my son will learn not to do idiotic things like this just like I should have from my father. Quoth my father:
      "If nothing else, maybe I can serve as a bad example."

      --
      He's getting rather old, but he's a good mouse.
    27. Re:warning labels by Minozake · · Score: 1

      Someone should plug in ten of those flashlights into an extension cord and see what happens...

      --
      http://sourcemage.org/ - Have fun :)
    28. Re:warning labels by Pojut · · Score: 1

      Do people sue because the judicial system allows them to, or does the judicial system exist because "we the people" demanded it to exist in it's current state? (not a troll, an honest question)

      Very good point you made, btw 8D

    29. Re:warning labels by pla · · Score: 1

      People like the child/wife/friend/visitor who picks up this neat little flashlight and, while remarking "I hate these maglite knock-offs" proceeds to permanently blind themselves?

      See my previous response to that question.

      Seriously, you people had better never visit my house. I doubt any of you could make it past the foyer without cutting your own heads off.

    30. Re:warning labels by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      form, shape, ... of the traditional flashlight

      Its worse than that. Its the same shape as a traditional Fleshlight. Some very nasty burn potential there.

    31. Re:warning labels by GuldKalle · · Score: 1

      The problem is that when an extension cord has three warning labels and my thermos says "Hot fluids must be handled with care" they lose meaning because nobody reads them anymore.

      --
      What?
    32. Re:warning labels by morcego · · Score: 1

      As another commenter pointed out, you can't use the design and form-factor of a harmless device when packaging an extremely dangerous device, because you will confuse and possibly harm people unintentionally.


      Unintentionally ? Since when ?
      --
      morcego
    33. Re:warning labels by SydShamino · · Score: 1

      Sadly, this sounds like the coffee incident, ready to happen again.

      People understand that coffee is hot. People understand that flashlights are bright.

      However, neither "hot" nor "bright" have precise values; both are relative terms. No reasonable person expects a "hot" cup of coffee to be 190 degrees Fahrenheit; they expect around 140 degrees at most. Likewise, no reasonable person would expect a "bright" flashlight to be 4100 Lumens - when a 2000 Lumen flashlight is suitable for most "bright" flashlight applications.

      In both cases, there are people who will claim that, in their ideal society, it is entirely up to the buyer to beware, and that everyone should walk around with an array of scientific instruments to gauge, measure, and test any product they consider before purchase, since putting a little label on something is an undue burden on the manufacturer.

      --
      It doesn't hurt to be nice.
    34. Re:warning labels by batquux · · Score: 2, Funny

      E. Look at the beam while it lights the orange label on fire.

    35. Re:warning labels by srussia · · Score: 1

      Nerd card. Now. Issue or revoke?
      --
      Set your phasers on "funky"!
    36. Re:warning labels by dbitter1 · · Score: 4, Informative

      I would really appreciate it if all my extension cords were clearly labeled for recommended maximum voltage. I'll assume you are serious and that isn't trollbait.

      Firstly, every cord *SHOULD* be labeled with maximium voltage... most likely 600V for most equipment. This is based on the voltage the insulation on the wires can withstand in a normal environment.

      What you likely meant to say is the maximum AMPERAGE (or wattage, which is voltage*amperage) a cable is designed for. This is a much harder thing to spec... just like a CPU, it depends what the temperature is. The larger a conductor (think cross-sectional area), the less resistance it has, and the less current will be lost to heat while in use. It is this heat that makes things unpleasant... you could take a "standard" cord and run 29384092385902380953A through it, but not for more than a millisecond or two whilst the metal melts and subsequently vaporizes in an explosive poof at room temperature.

      However, if you put it in liquid nitrogen, you likely will increase that time by several orders of magnitude... more assuming you can keep the cold flowing in (maybe a continual stream of L/N?)

      Coming back to reality, it may be safe to run your vacuum cleaner for a few minutes on the cord, even if it gets warm... assuming you *KNOW* it is getting warm, and you will stop using it shortly. Where it isn't safe is if you run a heater off of an undersized cord, then throw a rug on top of it to further keep ambient losses from cooling the cord, then spill something with a low flashpoint on the rug.

      Would make a hell of a warning label...

      --
      For us carnivores, "Sucking the marrow out of life" isn't a transcendentalist philosophy but a practical instruction.
    37. Re:warning labels by MadnessASAP · · Score: 1

      H dpes havea legitamite point, part of being a nerd IMHO is pushing things to the edge (or finding out what happens beyond that edge) but unless you know where that edge is you're just stubling around in the dark waiting to be eaten by a grue.

      --
      I may agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to face the consequences of saying it.
    38. Re:warning labels by Firehed · · Score: 1

      The common folk don't get high-power versus low-power. They don't realize that a space heater takes more power than a night-light. They certainly don't know the difference between 24ga and 12ga wire in terms of capacity (though I'd hope they're intelligent enough to realize one is thicker than the other).

      Yes, it SHOULD be common sense. Unfortunately thanks to medical breakthroughs, common sense is not as common as it once was. Make everything idiotproof and they'll start building better idiots, remember?

      --
      How are sites slashdotted when nobody reads TFAs?
    39. Re:warning labels by MadnessASAP · · Score: 1

      Holy shit how the hell did the first 4 words of that sentence get so badly mangled, excuse me while I go hand in MY nerd card.

      --
      I may agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to face the consequences of saying it.
    40. Re:warning labels by Ced_Ex · · Score: 5, Funny

      You forgot:

      E) Look directly into the beam.

      --
      Live forever, or die trying.
    41. Re:warning labels by Tony+Hoyle · · Score: 1

      I don't get why 4100 lumens is going to set things on fire - a home projector can often output 5000-7000 lumens and I haven't seen them cause any fires recently.

      Of course projectors have fans in them, but still....

    42. Re:warning labels by nategoose · · Score: 1

      What about protecting other people from stupid people? Perhaps a label stating "This chainsaw is dangerous!" would keep some moron from tapping the shoulder of his deaf neighbor as to get his attention.

    43. Re:warning labels by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      C) Care a million times more about not being sued than about how the damn thing looks.

      Some kid melts his face off with your flashlight and even though you kept it locked up on the highest shelf some sleezeball lawyer is going to argue in court that you were negligent because you removed the warning sticker. Of course, since you'll actually be using the flashlight, it won't always be locked up and some kid might grab it then.

    44. Re:warning labels by Sinbios · · Score: 1

      Maximum... voltage? All your appliances run on the same voltage.

      --
      Anyone can "stand up for what they believe", but it takes a very brave individual to change what they believe. - Loundry
    45. Re:warning labels by Mr.+Slippery · · Score: 5, Informative

      but a light that can burn shit?

      Only if you put the shit right up against the light.

      A 300 watt halogen bulb puts out almost 6000 lumens, much more powerful than this light. You can start a fire with one, but not across the room or anything. You have to get the combustibles right up against it. (Which is why the newer floor lamps using this sort of bulb have a safety cage.)

      There are many things in your house more dangerous than this super-bright flashlight. Should they all have labels? The problem is that when everything has a warning label, the chatter drowns out the important warnings.

      --
      Tom Swiss | the infamous tms | my blog
      You cannot wash away blood with blood
    46. Re:warning labels by GIL_Dude · · Score: 1

      Nicely said. However, one nit-pick. Don't think cross-sectional area; think surface area. I may be mis-remembering my electronics class, or it may only apply to high voltage systems - but what I recall is that surface area is important as most of the current flows near the surface. So much so that you could take a large cross-section wire and hollow it out and get nearly the same performance (of course it would then crush when you bent it around a corner).

    47. Re:warning labels by rubycodez · · Score: 1

      a 500W floodlight puts out 6500 lumens and can set near objects on fire too. most of an incandescent's energy is radiated as infrared. why anyone thinks a strong light bulb can't do such feats amazes me

    48. Re:warning labels by OrangeTide · · Score: 1

      You joke but some guns have been engraving warning labels on them. I don't want my beautiful Smith & Wesson ruined by some weak little message about reading the manual before operating. I can understand a sticker, put stickers all over it, I'll take them off with turpentine.

      --
      “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
    49. Re:warning labels by funkatron · · Score: 1

      Nor was their anything telling me I shouldn't plug a coffee pot, a space heater, and a PS3 onto the same cord!
      Wouldn't this just blow the fuse? More inconvenient than dangerous. Note that I'm just guessing, it's pretty hard to reach the limit of an extension cord. My band have run pretty much all their amps (with valves), pedals and keyboards off one socket before with no problems, not sure how that compares to a PS3 and a heater.
      --
      "Welcome to our world. We are the wasted youth. And we are the future too." Yes, I know these are stupid lyrics.
    50. Re:warning labels by t0rkm3 · · Score: 1

      You've forgotten who benefits most from redirecting liability from the user to the manufacturer.

      The lawyers.

      Some lawyer, somewhere, thought he could win or did win a suit for every warning label that you see. From the 'Do not leave the driver's seat while the vehicle is in Drive, even when Cruise Control is engaged' to the 'Do not touch the chain while the saw is operating' stupidity.

      Thank a lawyer today.

    51. Re:warning labels by ClickOnThis · · Score: 1

      "Hey! There was nothing that said it was dangerous to chew on the cord while it was plugged in! Nor was their anything telling me I shouldn't plug a coffee pot, a space heater, and a PS3 onto the same cord! I should sue their asses!" Hm. Maybe the Xbox should have come with a label that said "Warning: do not turn the product on." Good advice on many levels.
      --
      If it weren't for deadlines, nothing would be late.
    52. Re:warning labels by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the above example is way too sensible, im sure i heard that hoovers need a warning label saying not for internal use after some moron shoved it up his ass then sued

    53. Re:warning labels by cheater512 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Well why do you call it a flash light when it doesnt flash? :P

      A torch makes perfect sense.
      They used torches before electricity and lanterns to light up dark areas.

    54. Re:warning labels by mpe · · Score: 1

      I don't get why 4100 lumens is going to set things on fire - a home projector can often output 5000-7000 lumens and I haven't seen them cause any fires recently.

      Typically these have a reflector which only reflects visible light. They might also contain filters which only transmit visible light. In addition to having fairly exotic lamps. Thus the output is mostly visible light.
      This device uses a regular incandescent lamp with a reflector which reflects everything. If this puts out 4.1 kilo-lumens of visible light it's likely to be putting out considerably more as infrared.

    55. Re:warning labels by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One of my first jobs was, well, not entirely well-defined. When my boss needed something sawed, he'd have me go get one of the chainsaws. I'd had zero education in the ways of chainsaws. (The spinny end goes into the piece of wood, right?) After seeing me try a few times, he gave some tips: instead of trying to push it, put the blade underneath, jam the tooth in the front, and then you have a first-class lever you can drop your bodyweight on. Aah!

      Later when we were joking about it, he said something like "usually when you do stuff like this, they say you're supposed to wear gloves and safety glasses and stuff". Oops. Yeah, I guess that makes sense.

      Then there was the time we needed something sawed at the bottom of a pit full of water. For whatever reason (I swear it made sense at the time), they passed me the electric chainsaw. Here I am, barefoot in several inches of mud and about a foot of water, and trying to chainsaw the side of an 8-foot-deep pit I'm in, and it's so narrow I can barely turn around, and there's about 100 feet of extension cords running off to the nearest building. "Is it OK to use these things in water?" "No, not really. Hurry up. We don't have all day."

      In retrospect, I'm pretty lucky I didn't lose a finger, an eye, or my life. I suspect I'm one of the few surviving people in the world who learned to use a chainsaw by trial-and-error. I have been called stupid (and worse), but I did survive the chainsaws, so when I win the Darwin Award in a few years, it'll have to be for something *really* mind-bogglingly stupid.

    56. Re:warning labels by Angostura · · Score: 1

      If this was a extrension cord that came on a wind-up reel, one of the warnings should have been to make sure the thing was fully extended before use. Several times I have had to explain to people that having a high wattage going around a tightly coiled wire was a Bad Idea before extending to show how the wire was already too hot to touch.

    57. Re:warning labels by Chirs · · Score: 1

      Skin effect is really only significant at high frequencies. At standard mains frequencies (50/60Hz) the conductor cross section is the primary factor, modified by the temperature rating of the insulation.

    58. Re:warning labels by Belial6 · · Score: 1

      This is nothing like the coffee incident. Sane people expect to be injured if they dump coffee in their lap. Sane people understand that coffee, like tea is often made with boiling water. Making coffee with boiling water has been common for as long as people have been drinking coffee. On the other hand, flashlights that start fires is pretty new. Children regularly play by putting flashlights to their own faces as well as each others.

    59. Re:warning labels by gzerphey · · Score: 1

      Is it bad if I read the GP and didn't notice anything wrong at first?

      --
      I don't have a microwave. I do, however, have a clock that occasionally cooks shit.
    60. Re:warning labels by EMeta · · Score: 5, Funny

      You're absolutely right. Voltage. Ugh. I knew there was a reason us MechE's keep EE's around.

    61. Re:warning labels by ultranova · · Score: 1

      I'm not saying that it shouldn't, I'm saying that it shouldn't have to. It should be common sense not to put that many high-draw devices on a single, whimpy cord.

      The wimpy cord looks just the same as the cord which connects the house to the grid. Given this, how should Joe Average know that it is wimpier ? Especially since his house has circuit breakers / fuses which are supposed to disconnect the electric apparatus in the case of too much current.

      Besides, there is no way of simply looking at a cord and telling how much current it can carry, especially when the actual metal is invisible beneath insulation. You don't neccessarily even know the actual chemical composition of the wire; is it pure copper, or does it have impurities, and how do they affect the resistance ?

      So yes, cord should have mandatory labels for maximum load, both in ampers and watts (for normal household wall socket potential in the area it is to be used in).

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

    62. Re:warning labels by goofballs · · Score: 1

      However, neither "hot" nor "bright" have precise values; both are relative terms. No reasonable person expects a "hot" cup of coffee to be 190 degrees Fahrenheit; they expect around 140 degrees at most...In both cases, there are people who will claim that, in their ideal society, it is entirely up to the buyer to beware... no way dude, i would think most people would expect a 'hot' liquid to be closer to boiling (212 deg) than the hot water that comes out of the tap (usually 120-140 deg). heck, i'd probably be annoyed if it weren't hotter than hot tap water...
    63. Re:warning labels by nschubach · · Score: 1

      You bring up an interesting point here... in a sideways kind of way.

      How long is it before we have Federal Flash lite regulations in the US or how quickly do you think flash lites will be banned on carry on luggage?

      --
      Every time I start to have faith in humanity, I ruin it by driving to work between 7 and 8 am.
    64. Re:warning labels by Lehk228 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      early models did flash, or more specifically, batteries could only power them for a moment before they needed to "rest"

      --
      Snowden and Manning are heroes.
    65. Re:warning labels by jddj · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Of course they shouldn't. If someone is so brain damaged that they can't figure out that a SAW can hurt them, why shouldn't they suffer the consequences?

      Chainsaws have warning labels because they can hurt the user in ways the novice wouldn't expect by looking at the saw. Thinks like binding in the kerf and kicking.

    66. Re:warning labels by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      "Warning, extension cord is for external use only."

    67. Re:warning labels by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      get the facts.

    68. Re:warning labels by gallwapa · · Score: 1

      As confirmed by "Non functional Nintendo WiiMotes"...I've seen people complain about (...playing with a lamp behind their TV then wondering wtf motion tracking wasn't working)

    69. Re:warning labels by ultranova · · Score: 1

      I'm amazed at the number of people that will use two or three fifty footers, risking damage to their electrical equipment,

      Um, what risk ? Please explain why using long extension cords - in series if need be - should cause such a risk ? Sure, at some point the resistance will lower the voltage to the point where the equipment fails to function; but that seems unlikely to cause damage.

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

    70. Re:warning labels by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 1
      You forgot:

      F) Don't look directly at beam with remaining eye.

      --
      It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
    71. Re:warning labels by mOdQuArK! · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      See, that's an extension to the natural selection effect. Not only do stupid people remove themselves from the gene pool, but people who are too stupid to keep a wary eye out for stupid people are also removed from the gene pool. (Do I really need to add a sarcasm tag?)

    72. Re:warning labels by piojo · · Score: 1

      Do people sue because the judicial system allows them to, or does the judicial system exist because "we the people" demanded it to exist in it's current state? (not a troll, an honest question) I've never sued anybody, but here's how I think about it: let's say you manufacture a stupid product (say, a kid's toy that's poisonous, or a device cylindrical device that when one flips a switch, it will immediately burn the person holding it, then cause a fire).

      If you, the manufacturer, did something wrong, whatever happens is N% your fault. And you should be sued for N% of the damage caused. Selling a product that is dangerous, but not obviously so, is wrong. A warning label is perfect, so that 1) a careless customer is warned, and 2) a picky customer can remove the label.

      In short, we demand this system. I'm not in favor of bad lawsuits, but it's not always clear what is a bad lawsuit. People disagree.
      --
      A cat can't teach a dog to bark.
    73. Re:warning labels by mOdQuArK! · · Score: 5, Funny

      You know you're really playing with Darwin when you actually get USED to getting shocked by line current. I fell into that mode when I was fixing up all the outlets in my house. I was too lazy to set up a battery-powered lamp & work in the dark, so I did everything with the breakers still on. I kept on brushing the wires with my bare skin & getting shocked. After a dozen or so "d*mnit"s, I started ignoring the shocks & just doing the work.

      Granted, I didn't actually grab any of the bare wire ends and hang on, but in retrospect it wasn't exactly the safest behavior to be following.

      Not long after that, I tried testing a 220V outlet with the back of my hand & ended up punching myself in the face. Beauty of a black eye, and a great conversation starter :-)

    74. Re:warning labels by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      F) With remaining eye.

    75. Re:warning labels by arrenlex · · Score: 1
      I am going to replace your comparison with the topic at hand because you've forgotten what we're talking about.

      Of course they shouldn't. If someone is so brain damaged that they can't figure out that a FLASHLIGHT can hurt them, why shouldn't they suffer the consequences?

      You can't protect stupid people from themselves, and you shouldn't try. It just encourages the spread of stupidity among the general population.
    76. Re:warning labels by jftitan · · Score: 1

      Maybe your father is much more wiser than you grant him credit for.

      this line - "If nothing else, maybe I can serve as a bad example.", is an excellent example for most people that I encounter on a daily basis. Just wish people would realize that.

      woman with phone "I broke my phone(by dropping it in the toilet), but I'm only 2 months(72 days) into my new(2yr) contract, can I buy(replace) this phone for a new $49.99 phone?" (corrections to her question added)
      [looked up her account]
      me, the tech "Unfortunately you got locked into a contract, thus subsidizing the price of your broken phone. You'll have to pay full price for your replacement phone."
      WWP "What does that mean?"
      MTT "It means, you wont get the lower price discount for your next phone."
      WWP "what does that mean?"
      MTT "Your going to pay around $300 for a replacement phone."
      WWP "What does that mean?"
      MTT (your serious?) "The cheapest replacement phone I can get you is $249.99. Because your not going to get the discounts you received for your first phone. I know... I hate that as well. I hate contracts, but thats the trade off in getting your phone for so cheap the first time."
      WWP "Thats bullshit, I want my money back, I hate this phone..."

      I choose not to continue... But seriously that is exactly how the conversation started.

      --
      "Don't Forget to Salt the Fries"
    77. Re:warning labels by ChrisMP1 · · Score: 1

      Considering drinking water is banned on carry-on luggage, I give it five minutes.

      --
      <sig>&nbsp;</sig>
    78. Re:warning labels by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 1

      Well why do you call it a flash light when it doesnt flash? :P Old flashlights used a button instead of a switch to activate.

      --

      "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

    79. Re:warning labels by genericpoweruser · · Score: 1

      They certainly don't know the difference between 24awg and 12awg wire... There I fixed that for you.
      --
      A fool and his lamb are worth two in the bush.
    80. Re:warning labels by riseoftheindividual · · Score: 1

      Obviously we should all just start wearing helmets and safety gear at all times. I mean, it's just not fair to stop at warning labels, what about those poor souls who can't read?

      --
      Patriot - A fan of expanding government power and spending while not wanting to pay higher taxes.
    81. Re:warning labels by PayPaI · · Score: 1

      If you're running something with a motor and the voltage drops, it's going to draw more current and could burn it out.

    82. Re:warning labels by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1. Chainsaw - Everyone knows that chainsaws ARE dangerous. The warning labels tell you HOW they are dangerous, and what you specifically should avoid doing - these things are not so obvious. 2. Flashlight - how the HELL is someone supposed to know that an ordinary looking flashlight is dangerous? I suppose if you are buying this from wicked lasers you know what you are getting yourself into, but that won't do the next poor sap who picks it up unawares any good

    83. Re:warning labels by networkBoy · · Score: 1

      Previous reply aptly noted this was for RF, and to further expound on your hollowed out conductor, that is exactally where you start crossing into waveguide technology (a hollow conductor). Interestingly I've seen coax that was about 1.5" in diameter adn the inner conductor was a spiral wound copper tube, not a solid or stranded conductor. I looked it up and it was basically for applications where a waveguide was ideal, but not mandatory, but plain 'ol high performance coax was not up to the job, and coax was the preferred medium due to application specifics (i.e. you don't want to bury waveguides in direct burial wiring).
      -nB

      --
      whois gawk date unzip strip find touch finger mount join nice man top fsck grep eject more yes exit umount sleep dump
    84. Re:warning labels by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Label: Cake
      Ad: Perhaps a nice slice of deliciously moist cake?

      Label: Rat Poison
      Ad: Perhaps a nice slice of deliciously moist cake... for rats?
      WARNING: DO NOT CONSUME. THIS WILL KILL YOU.

      Label: Chainsaw
      WARNING: DO NOT STICK YOUR FACE INTO THE CHAINSAW CHAIN. THIS MAY DAMAGE YOUR EYES.
      WARNING: THIS MAY CAUSE SERIOUS INJURY.
      WARNING: FOR GOD'S SAKE, BE CAREFUL AND DON'T SUE US.
      WARNING: THIS MAY CAUSE SERIOUS INJURY. WE ARE NOT LIABLE. GOD HELP YOU IF YOU'RE AN IDIOT.

      The situation isn't exactly black and white. If the "New 4100 Lumen Flashlight" poses a legitimate threat (i.e., it's not blatantly obvious), then it probably warrants a warning label. I, too, think it should be visually distinctive. The name "torch" for a flashlight, unlike, say, "rat poison" or "chainsaw" doesn't seem to embody the potential danger well enough alone.

      But a chainsaw? I think the criticism deals with the obvious, not with the "Warning: There's a hidden bomb attached to this inconspicuous chainsaw that will go off if you do " kind of label (i.e., NOT blatantly obvious).

      campaign

    85. Re:warning labels by Anne+Honime · · Score: 1

      This reminds me of a retrospective fear that nearly made me collapse when I fully realised how close I came to actually die by fire. The previous tenant of the appartement I rent now had thought no better than to hook a 300 liters electrical water heater with *speakers cables* to the mains. I had noticed the wires coiled at the bottom of the fuse box, but I thought it could only be the outside doorbell wiring (honest mistake, I only looked by day and the heater works only at night, plus the only thing I know about electricity is the phone number of a knowledgeable handyman). But some months after moving in, I had to change a fuse by night and touched the wires. They were boilling hot. I'm still shaking.

    86. Re:warning labels by jamesh · · Score: 1

      Last time I bought an extension cord it had 4 different warning labels I had to take off

      Did one of the warning labels read "please remove all warning labels before operating this device"?
    87. Re:warning labels by TheSkyIsPurple · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Right, but being made with boiling water, and being kept near boiling are two different things.

      One might expect to get scalded when spilling hot coffee, but not skin-melted-off-plastic-surgery level.
      McDonalds was told to cool it down many times prior to that for years and they never did.

    88. Re:warning labels by elsilver · · Score: 1

      My wife's curling iron has a sticker on it: "Caution, can cause burns to eyes" or something similar.

      What I can't figure out is why they decided that they had to call out the "to eyes" part. Here is this hot stick thing, which I imagine could cause burns to just about any body part it was applied to, yet for some reason they decided not to use the general "may cause burns", indead going for the specific "may cause burns to eyes".

      Really, I'd like to know what lawyer decided that one was needed.

      E.

    89. Re:warning labels by seeker_1us · · Score: 1

      If I owned one, I would have a sticker on it with the address of a youtube clip. You know the one in Raiders of the Lost Ark where the Nazi's face melts off?

    90. Re:warning labels by seeker_1us · · Score: 1

      Of course they shouldn't. If someone is so brain damaged that they can't figure out that a SAW can hurt them, why shouldn't they suffer the consequences?

      Have you ever USED a chainsaw?

      Would you like to take the warning label off about kickback? You know, the unfortunate thing where the tip of the saw gets caught and kicks the saw upward into the body and/or face of the user if they don't know about it?

      Maybe you should pay a little more attention to warning labels.

    91. Re:warning labels by Vexor · · Score: 5, Funny

      G.) Buy two and use them to melt the labels of each other.

      --
      ~Vexed and loving it!
    92. Re:warning labels by kramulous · · Score: 1

      I'm pretty sure it's a revoke. Part of being a nerd is knowing that something can be potentially harmful (to self or inanimate object) but going ahead anyway. Trial and error ... the true force that binds the universe together.

      Of course, you could always be the true engineering nerd type and use one of these (http://the-gadgeteer.com/review/kill_a_watt_electric_usage_monitor_review) instead. Either way, warning label is never taken seriously until after the fact.

      --
      .
    93. Re:warning labels by markov_chain · · Score: 1

      Dude. If there was enough current to melt the wires and cause a fire, it would have happened before you moved in. However, it looks like it was just short of melting, so you were relatively safe. Stop your retrospective fear :)

      Once I brought some prototype gadget with me on the subway in a totebag. It was hooked up to a small 12V lead-acid battery. Yeah, I know. Luckily the other sharp stuff in the bag only shorted the power leads when I left the train. The current immediately melted the power leads, stopping further damage, so there was never a real danger. However, I'm sure the trigger-happy public safety officials wouldn't have appreciated the resulting impressive cloud of smoke had it released inside the train ;)

      --
      Tsunami -- You can't bring a good wave down!
    94. Re:warning labels by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hell with setting shit on fire.

      If the cops are screwing with you at night, One flick from this beam in his face and you can walk away before they can even figure out what direction you went in.

      This is an awesome device for protecting your freedom.

      Hell you have enough time to taze the cop a couple times while screaming "dont taze me bro! YOU LIKE IT? HUH??"

      sounds like a freedom fighter tool to me.

      4116 4533 3234 4355 8766 5456 8977 2102

    95. Re:warning labels by nmos · · Score: 1

      I'm sorry to tell you this, but the reason that extension cord you bought had 4 different warning labels on it was because of morons that do something completely stupid, and then blame the manufacturer for not having a warning label telling you not to do it.

      So then the solution is to start suing for having too many warnings. I'll bet a sleezy enough lawyer could make the case that having too many warnings caused one important one to be missed.

    96. Re:warning labels by sakusha · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Safety can also depend on intensity. I read about how the Army experimented with aerial flash photography, they had some massive flash units that could illuminate the ground from an airplane at a high altitude. But if you set one off when it was on the ground, anyone nearby would be burned badly. Now today they make commercial ovens using that same principle, the Flash-Bake oven can cook a pizza in 1 minute with high intensity flash units.

    97. Re:warning labels by zippthorne · · Score: 1

      Interesting. Did you offer to re-activate her old phone? Or did you just kind of write her off instead of trying to salvage a little company goodwill because she wasn't that bright and/or wanted you to think she wasn't that bright?

      --
      Can you be Even More Awesome?!
    98. Re:warning labels by Fastolfe · · Score: 1

      A legitimate risk does not make for a legitimate warning label. Anything that falls into the "mind-numbingly obvious" category should not need a warning label.

      A "legitimate" risk suggests a risk that the manufacturer knew about. If the manufacturer knew about a risk but elected not to warn people about it, you could argue that they were being negligent. A person suing the manufacturer over a "mind-numbingly obvious" risk would probably lose at trial, but the costs of defending such a suit, even successfully, are usually far more than the costs of settling, and the costs of settling are in turn usually far greater than the costs of buying a bunch of stickers with warnings on them and affixing them to your products.

      It's not the merit of the lawsuit that matters, it's the cost of defending or settling those suits that you will invariably get without those warning labels. An entire industry exists where people work to exploit any ambiguity or lack of warning, because they know there's a good chance they will win a jackpot if the company decides to settle the case. The most economical way to deal with these people is to slap warning labels on everything, even for risks that most people would consider obvious.

      You wouldn't have this in a loser-pays system, but there are drawbacks to that as well.

    99. Re:warning labels by fredklein · · Score: 1

      No reasonable person expects a "hot" cup of coffee to be 190 degrees Fahrenheit; they expect around 140 degrees at most.

      Sorry. Wrong.

      The National Coffee Association of U.S.A. Inc, (and who better to know coffee, eh?) says :
      Your brewer should maintain a water temperature between 195 - 205 degrees Fahrenheit for optimal extraction....Brewed coffee should be enjoyed immediately!...If it will be a few minutes before it will be served, the temperature should be maintained at 180 - 185 degrees Fahrenheit.
      - http://www.ncausa.org/i4a/pages/index.cfm?pageid=71

      And even home coffee makers have similar temperatures. Check out some of their online user manuals. For example:
      http://www.bunn.com/pdfs/retail/usecare/38865.0000_NHBX_U_C_English.pdf
      Pay attention to page 3: "The water is approximately 50F hotter than what's available from your hot water faucet" (most hot water faucets are 140 deg. + 50 = 190!)
      and page 7: "BUNN recommends you AVOID: ...
      Re-heating for serving any coffee with a temperature below 175F.
      "
      oh- almost forgot page 6: "The patented ready-to-brew reservoir keeps water at the ideal brewing
      temperature of approximately 200F.
      "

      So, despite what you think, a 'reasonable' person DOES expect hot coffee to be around 190 degrees. At least, if by 'reasonable' you mean 'can listen to the industry experts' and ' can read the fucking manual'.

    100. Re:warning labels by kongit · · Score: 0

      nope you are just acclimatized to bad writing

    101. Re:warning labels by treeves · · Score: 1

      "...the reason that extension cord you bought had 4 different warning labels on it was because of morons that
      [1] do something completely stupid, and then
      [2] blame the manufacturer for not having a warning label telling you not to do it."

      Necessary, but not adequate.

      You forgot,

      [3] Hire a lawyer to sue the manufacturer for thousands or millions of dollars.

      --
      ...the future crusty old bastards are already drinking the Kool-Aid.
    102. Re:warning labels by BoiseAlf · · Score: 1

      Don't give the lawyers too much credit. I bet that most warning labels come from someone actually bringing their toaster into the bathtub with them than a lawyer thinking that they may one day get sued for such a practice.

    103. Re:warning labels by isomeme · · Score: 1

      We used to have a 250-watt halogen floor lamp. One time a bee had gotten into the room, and I opened a window and tried to shoo it back outside. Instead, it flew over to that lamp, landed on the bulb, and sat there. I crept up to deal with it...and noticed that the bee was starting to blacken, smoke, and curl up on itself.

      Those bulbs are *scary* hot.

      --
      When all you have is a hammer, everything looks like a skull.
    104. Re:warning labels by Nazlfrag · · Score: 4, Funny

      Don't worry, these are elegant weapons from a more civilized age.

    105. Re:warning labels by Neo+Quietus · · Score: 1

      Have YOU ever used a chainsaw? I have, many times, including two summers of work cutting down trees and clearing brush along a fence-line. I have had chainsaws kick back at me (although you have to be a little careless to let that happen, if you don't cut with the tip it can't kick back at you), and I have never had the chainsaw move more than six inches when kicking back. If you READ the manual and keep two hands on the chainsaw at all times then you can easily prevent it from kicking back into anything important. Frankly, I found the chainsaw to be one of the more harmless tools to use.

    106. Re:warning labels by blackest_k · · Score: 1

      I would really appreciate it if all my extension cords were clearly labeled for recommended maximum voltage. I mean, sure I can figure I shouldn't put on too much, but knowing that figure each time I use it would be handy. not really since most extension cords go into mains outlets and the voltage is not the critical factor (on a national basis).

      Current however usually is a limiting factor, in an ideal world you wouldnt put a 13 amp fuse in a plug for an extension cable rated for 5 amps but it can happen which is why most extension cables are capable of handling more current than the fuse.

      Incidentally cable reels can handle less current coiled up than when fully unwound. maybe thats due to inductance or inability of the cable to get rid of the heat generated (more expensive extensions have a thermal cut out).

      W= I V and V=I R

      From these basic equations you can see american hairdryers would tend to be dangerous if plugged into european mains electricity and european hairdryers wouldn't get very warm in the usa . Mainland Europe in practice has lower voltage than the UK which means european hairdryers tend to get too hot.

      In theory the UK dropped its voltage to 220V from 240/250V in practice there is a deviation allowed around 10% which means UK mains voltage is in spec without changing anything. Most laptop PSU's are able to cope with 110v- 240V without issues. I am not so sure if a mobile phone mains charger would survive a trip from the US to Europe.

      Hope that helps.

    107. Re:warning labels by FSWKU · · Score: 1

      Would you package rat poison to look like candy bars or perhaps like a nice slice of deliciously moist cake?

      That cake is most DEFINITELY a lie!
      --
      "So after all this, you make my case for me. To end this stalemate, you must die..."
    108. Re:warning labels by glitch23 · · Score: 0

      Would you package rat poison to look like candy bars...

      Maybe not but the reverse has basically happened already.

      --
      this nation, under God, shall have a new birth of freedom. -- Lincoln, Gettysburg Address
    109. Re:warning labels by budgenator · · Score: 1

      Duh, you were in a 8 foot pit, if you used a gasoline powered chainsaw you'd have gotten carbon monoxide and might have passed out and got chewed up by the saw!

      --
      Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
    110. Re:warning labels by glitch23 · · Score: 0

      I'm sorry to tell you this, but the reason that extension cord you bought had 4 different warning labels on it was because of morons that do something completely stupid, and then blame the manufacturer for not having a warning label telling you not to do it.

      I've always had the mindset that if I see a stupid warning on something I bought then I know that someone before me bought the same thing, tried whatever the warning label said not to do, and the company instituted the warning label as a result. If the courts didn't reward such stupidity the companies wouldn't have to make the rest of us laugh at the various types of warning labels that have to be used. Of course the companies probably are more proactive now and, as you said, have their lawyers come up with ways that a product should not be used. Of course, there are really an infinite number of ways of how something should not be used but I guess they try to target the most common denominator of stupidity to save money.

      --
      this nation, under God, shall have a new birth of freedom. -- Lincoln, Gettysburg Address
    111. Re:warning labels by budgenator · · Score: 1

      I lost the safety cover on mine, now there is a little puff of smoke when a moth get attracted to the pretty light.

      --
      Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
    112. Re:warning labels by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 1
      The name "torch" for a flashlight, unlike, say, "rat poison" or "chainsaw" doesn't seem to embody the potential danger well enough alone.

      Especially, since "torch" in the King's English, means "flashlight."

      -b.

    113. Re:warning labels by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      There are basically two types of cords: Big thick ones that can take pretty much whatever the circuit can, and little thin lamp cords that don't even have a ground plug. If you find yourself plugging big thick cords into little thin cords or cutting off ground plugs, you are doing it wrong.

      Don't people wonder why the one cord is so big?

      In places with 220V, I've never seen a thin lamp extension cord - but they exist, right?

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    114. Re:warning labels by budgenator · · Score: 1

      The some military equipment and avionics run on 400Hz Ac power, and we normally unspooled the power cables and figure-eighted the excess, which supposedly causes the inductances to cancel out.

      --
      Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
    115. Re:warning labels by rpillala · · Score: 1

      It's either warning labels or lawsuits. They're not doing this to protect stupid from itself. They're protecting themselves from stupid when stupid gets a lawyer.

      --
      When the axe came to the forest, the trees said, "Look out - the handle was once one of us."
    116. Re:warning labels by flappinbooger · · Score: 1

      But you can go to a hardware store and buy a 800+ degree heat gun. I see no problem with this...

      Well, that is, until someone thinks it's just an ordinary flashlight... My kids are small and sometimes need to be reminded to not stare directly into flashlights. Oy...

      Do not stare directly into flashlight with remaining good eye!

      --
      Flappinbooger isn't my real name
    117. Re:warning labels by mikael · · Score: 1

      That was the coolest thing of living in Canada and the USA. For some reason, apartments don't have ceiling lights like the UK. Instead residents had to buy Halogen floor lamps that faced upwards. Anything that landed between the lamp and the base became instant crispy critters. The most impressive fry-up was a large ant/moth that actually started crackling and popping for around five minutes. Even leaving a door open for less than a minute would lead to something being fried.

      --
      Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
    118. Re:warning labels by node+3 · · Score: 1

      Probably so that when a woman curls her bangs, she'll already be thinking about not burning her eyes.

      There are already a ton of replies above about how things like this should be obvious (they are), but just because they are obvious does not mean you are going to actually *think* of them. How many times have you done something stupid that should have been obvious in retrospect?

      In most cases, no big deal. You get a laugh and you learn. But something like burning your fucking eyes seems like it deserves a warning.

    119. Re:warning labels by Kaenneth · · Score: 1

      One of the worst products I have seen, is candy shaped like lego blocks...

      The candy itself isn't bad, but it might lead to some kids choking on a real lego...

    120. Re:warning labels by Swampash · · Score: 1

      There are many things in your house more dangerous than this super-bright flashlight. Should they all have labels? The problem is that when everything has a warning label, the chatter drowns out the important warnings.

      That's why right now the State of New York is considering making it illegal to possess any of those things.

    121. Re:warning labels by megabunny · · Score: 2, Funny

      My favourite, and posted on my wall, reputedly winner of some contest:

      "Caution: accidents with chainsaws are rarely trivial"

      MB

      --
      I am a viral sig. Please copy me and help me spread. Thank you.
    122. Re:warning labels by node+3 · · Score: 1

      Warning labels don't protect those of us with two neurons to rub together Not true. Everybody does something stupid at some time, everybody lacks knowledge about things they encounter in daily life. Warning labels help protect everyone from the mistakes that any person could reasonably make about something.

      Think about it for a second. How did you gain the common sense in the first place about something that is listed on a warning label? You were *warned* by someone else, sometimes in person, sometimes via a label. For some people (few in general society, but probably a much higher percentage here on slashdot), they have an education from which they can deduce certain practices to be avoided, like the warning labels on extension cords that seems to have irked so many here today. *You* might know Ohm's Law, Watt's Law, some additional elementary physics, and the implications thereof, but it's foolish to believe that it's therefore common sense. It's even more foolish to believe that just because you know something that it will follow that you will automatically apply it to every situation where it arises. Unless you somehow manage to never make a mistake that in retrospect seems obvious.

      They keep people in the gene pool who Darwin-the-Lifeguard needs to toss out ASAP. Warning labels have nothing to do with being stupid, they have to do with being ignorant, and *everyone* starts out life ignorant.

      I don't see how anyone can reasonably argue against the inclusion of warning labels. No matter how stupid you seem to think the people are that the labels target, it seems to me that to argue against warning those people is even more stupid. The tragedy of that stance is compounded by the fact that *every one of us* does, has, and will, benefit from such warnings from time-to-time.
    123. Re:warning labels by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Anyone who thinks a chainsaw doesn't need warning labels has never used a chainsaw.

    124. Re:warning labels by El_Oscuro · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I was once in London, and had to set up some US computer equipment. We used transformers to convert the 220 to 110 US voltage. Our SOP (which of course I didn't follow) was to use a voltage meter prior to plugging anything in. Instead, I plugged a laptop into it and booted it up just fine. Then I plugged a surge protector which promptly exploded (it was pretty spectacular). Finally following the SOP, I checked the output voltage of the transformer which was actually about 350 volts. Apparently the laptop had a pretty good power supply.

      --
      "Be grateful for what you have. You may never know when you may lose it."
    125. Re:warning labels by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      Last time I bought an extension cord it had 4 different warning labels I had to take off. I wonder how many warning labels this flashlight will carry?

      Doesn't matter much because the light with a mirror can burn all the labels off instantly.

      (But rest assured the next version will have a "Warning: do not burn warning labels off" warning.)

    126. Re:warning labels by SydShamino · · Score: 1

      The National Coffee Association are going to get their asses sued, and good riddance to them.

      http://www.tap-water-burn.com/

      Tell you what. How about you pour yourself a nice hot cup of 190 degree coffee, and "enjoy it immediately", and see if you end up looking like the person in the picture on that website.

      --
      It doesn't hurt to be nice.
    127. Re:warning labels by Wonko+the+Sane · · Score: 1

      Holy shit how the hell did the first 4 words of that sentence get so badly mangled, excuse me while I go hand in MY nerd card.
      You lose less points if you come up with a better excuse. Blaming alcohol works pretty well.
    128. Re:warning labels by Wonko+the+Sane · · Score: 1
    129. Re:warning labels by Wes+Janson · · Score: 1

      I'm embarassed to admit that I chose "E" before I even finished reading the entire question... Ehh, retinas are a dime a dozen these days anyhow.

    130. Re:warning labels by tylernt · · Score: 1

      That was the coolest thing of living in Canada and the USA. For some reason, apartments don't have ceiling lights like the UK. Instead residents had to buy Halogen floor lamps that faced upwards.
      Er no, this is one of my biggest pet peeves living in the States. You KNOW you're going to need to light a room, why the heck don't they put lights in the ceiling! I hate spending hard-earned money on lamps, finding places to put them, and then buying more lamps when they get knocked over and broken. And they're often a pain to turn on and off since many outlets are not switch-controlled. Stupid Americans can't do anything right.

      Note for the humor-impaired: I'm an American.
      --
      DRM 'manages access' in the same way that a prison 'manages freedom'
    131. Re:warning labels by fredklein · · Score: 1

      How about you pour yourself a nice hot cup of 190 degree coffee, and "enjoy it immediately",

      People often do. You see, when drinking hot coffee, people 'sip' it. Sipping involves only a small amount of hot liquid, and draws in air along with the hot liquid, cooling it.

      The site you mention is about people immersing their entire bodies in a large quantity of hot liquid, not people sipping small quantiites of a hot liquid. I think the difference is obvious.

      The National Coffee Association are going to get their asses sued, and good riddance to them.


      They haven't been yet (so far as I know).

    132. Re:warning labels by Sparky+McGruff · · Score: 1

      They put warning labels on extension cords, because there are people like this out there.

    133. Re:warning labels by xaosflux · · Score: 1

      Buy two and cross the streams!

    134. Re:warning labels by Paxtez · · Score: 1

      Would you package rat poison to look like candy bars or perhaps like a nice slice of deliciously moist cake? The cake is a lie.

    135. Re:warning labels by shadowbearer · · Score: 1


        E. Can't read the warning sticker, because your school didn't teach you how to read.

      SB

      --
      It's old. The more humans I meet, the more I like my cats. At least they are honest.
    136. Re:warning labels by shadowbearer · · Score: 1


        I'm a maintenance person nowadays, and I deal with a lot of college students living in the apartments I keep up.

        Maybe one in five of those students understands that an electric baseboard heater can start things on fire, DESPITE the warnings printed on the heaters (in two languages, here).

        Perhaps - just perhaps - our educational systems should include basic things like this? Might save some lives, methinks. But practical vocational education in our primary schools is almost nonexistent nowadays.

        (don't get me wrong, we need math, writing, and some history. But isn't the idea of primary education to teach kids how to deal with the real world? Shouldn't we include relevant technological knowledge as well?)

      SB

      --
      It's old. The more humans I meet, the more I like my cats. At least they are honest.
    137. Re:warning labels by OrangeTide · · Score: 1

      flashlights? I'm pretty sure all they are just used by the cops to anally violate civilians.

      --
      “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
    138. Re:warning labels by shadowbearer · · Score: 1


        Firstly, every cord *SHOULD* be labeled with maximium voltage... most likely 600V for most equipment. This is based on the voltage the insulation on the wires can withstand in a normal environment.

        The ones I sold in the hardware store I worked in up until a couple years ago are.

        The problem isn't the labeling or lack of it, not anymore. The problem is that the people buying them don't understand the labeling.

        No amount of labeling is going to solve the basic problem of people not being educated in what the labeling means.

      SB

      --
      It's old. The more humans I meet, the more I like my cats. At least they are honest.
    139. Re:warning labels by shotgunefx · · Score: 1

      That's retarded. It looks exactly like a device that the vast majority of all humans would assume is harmless (and 99.9999999999% of the time, be correct in doing so).

      I would think you would figure out pretty quick that it's hot, but it's not that hard to imagine someone coming across it (say watching someone's home while they owner is away, etc) and thinking it's not a fire hazard.

      I mean, I hate that we along with idiots need to be told "COFFEE IS HOT!" but a warning on something like this makes perfect sense.

      --

      -William Shatner can be neither created nor destroyed.
    140. Re:warning labels by Dun+Malg · · Score: 1

      no way dude, i would think most people would expect a 'hot' liquid to be closer to boiling (212 deg) than the hot water that comes out of the tap (usually 120-140 deg). heck, i'd probably be annoyed if it weren't hotter than hot tap water...
      Only if asked "in degrees, what temperature is hot coffee", because people have no fucking clue what constitutes "drinkable" temperatures, they only know that it's made with boiling water so they ignorantly would say (like you) "closer to boiling, more than 175 degrees*". And, no, you wouldn't
      Really, the moral here is that just because you think you know something doesn't mean you do.

      * 176 degrees is exactly half way between 140 and 212, and water that temperature could easily strip the skin off the roof of your mouth
      --
      If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
    141. Re:warning labels by Dun+Malg · · Score: 1

      no way dude, i would think most people would expect a 'hot' liquid to be closer to boiling (212 deg) than the hot water that comes out of the tap (usually 120-140 deg). heck, i'd probably be annoyed if it weren't hotter than hot tap water...
      Only if asked "in degrees, what temperature is hot coffee", because people have no fucking clue what constitutes "drinkable" temperatures, they only know that it's made with boiling water so they ignorantly would say (like you) "closer to boiling, more than 175 degrees*". And, no, you wouldn't be annoyed by 140 degree coffee, because any higher than 140 constitutes a burn hazard. Most people drinking out of a Mr Coffee are drinking at 135-140.

      Really, the moral here is that just because you think you know something doesn't mean you do.

      * 176 degrees is exactly half way between 140 and 212, and water that temperature could easily strip the skin off the roof of your mouth
      --
      If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
    142. Re:warning labels by inKubus · · Score: 1

      You mean:

      E) Look directly into the beam, with remaining eye.

      --
      Cool! Amazing Toys.
    143. Re:warning labels by Eivind · · Score: 1

      I -halfway- agree with you.

      It's reasonable to expect warnings for dangers that are out of the ordinary. You don't expect a flashlight that you leave on and put down on a table to accidentally ignite papers that are also lying on that table, so I'd say that is an out-of-the-ordinary danger.

      But US products are ridicolous in putting on warning-labels for "dangers" that are completely ordinary and would be shared by any similar object.

      I've got a WIFI-antenna with a large red-yellow warning-sticker on it, with a human skull in a triangle and "risk of DEATH" in huge letters. When you read it more carefully, the actual danger is, the thing is made of -metal- and thus capable of conducting -electricity-. If you where to stand at your roof (say while installing the thing) hold one end, and poke the other end at a nearby high-voltage electricity-line, this could be bad for your health.

      I've got a childrens inflatable pool. It's got warnings in 5 languages. Those on German and Scandinawian simply says: "use under adult supervision" (and even that is superfluous really), the warning in english is ten lines long and includes such gems as "not suitable for diving-practice" (the pool is all of 10 inches deep!)

      I've got a battery-charger that warns, in big red letters: "Do not microwave".

      The US tendency to CYA is ridicolous, and actually it makes people respect warnings less. When there's a gazillion warnings on EVERYTHING, how do you recognize the real dangers as opposed to the useless chaff ?

    144. Re:warning labels by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As a third year engineer student, I've met my fair share of public relations people and marketing people as well as development folk from many different companies. And thus, I've talked a bit about selling to USA and problems related to that (for European companies). Thing is, that many companies would probably like to come to USA with their products, but these warning labels and 'I'll sue you' -mentality stops them. I mean (like), if you have to have a warning label warning not to put a cat to a microwave, come on. For comparison, I bought several extension cords few months back and they didn't have warning labels, only one describing the spesifications of the ext. cord.

      This is probably pretty non-brainer for most of you, but anyway I just wanted to share something.

    145. Re:warning labels by Lemmy+Caution · · Score: 1

      The thing needs to not look like a regular flashlight. If it does look like a regular flashlight, I will drop everything I am doing now to become a torts lawyer, because the money will just make itself.

      It's nothing to do with being "smart" or "stupid." If you go to a restaurant, use the restroom, and they just happen to keep a few piranha in an aquarium that just happens to look like a toilet bowl, I think you'd probably not say, "oh, foolish me, for sitting on this thing that looks exactly like a toilet bowl.

      That was the best analogy I've come up with today.

    146. Re:warning labels by argiedot · · Score: 1

      The warning about diving is reasonable. There are people who will try diving into everything. A while ago there was this article in the news here about a kid who killed himself diving (head first) into a shallow swimming pool for kids. One guy from my college died two years ago when he dived into a natural pond nearby, the pond itself is usually deep enough, but there'd been rains recently and part of the side had caved in when the rainwater flowed in, so the floor was raised a bit.

      As for the battery charger, there are people who have accidentally microwaved their laptop and in the litigation-friendly world that America is, it's only safe to have that warning (even though these people who microwaved their laptop did not, in fact, try to sue). There is also the "Do not throw in fire" warning, and people do have a tendency to do stuff like that. And while we're talking about litigation, someone was expressing contempt at "Coffee is hot.": Does no one remember Liebeck vs. McDonald's? Get rid of that ridiculous let's-sue-everyone crap and such warning labels will sort themselves out, but complaining about the warning labels without bothering to address this issue is ignorance at best and incredible stupidity at worst.

    147. Re:warning labels by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OTOH, you can still have a lighter in your carry-on luggage. But apparently nothing to put a fire out with.

    148. Re:warning labels by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Would you package rat poison to look like candy bars or perhaps like a nice slice of deliciously moist cake?

      Seen (or smelled) a pack of those colorfully illustrated Camel Filters lately?

    149. Re:warning labels by z4pp4 · · Score: 1

      As another commenter pointed out, you can't use the design and form-factor of a harmless device when packaging an extremely dangerous device, because you will confuse and possibly harm people unintentionally. Would you package rat poison to look like candy bars or perhaps like a nice slice of deliciously moist cake? Warning labels protect people. They may not serve to protect the buyer of a given device, because they generally tend to know what they're buying and what it's used/not used for; but it can serve to protect somebody unfamiliar with the device, somebody who may happen upon it by random chance. If I owned one of these lights, I would have a sticker on it that said "DO NOT POINT AT FACE. EVER. SRSLY."

      You have a good point, but as The design of everyday things state, labels are signs of bad design.
      Good design might put in the following safeguards:
      * Make the light power up slower, thus protecting people from getting blinded when switching it on.
      * Make the beam wider, with intensity variant between outer rim and inner spot.
      * Put in detectors for cornea reflection.
      * Put in a mini thermostat to switch off on high temperatures.
    150. Re:warning labels by TheLink · · Score: 1

      Maybe we should have labels encouraging stupid people to kill themselves in ways that aren't dangerous to other people :).

      Chainsaws would have signs saying: "Please chop off your head first before attempting to chop anything else".
      Microwaves would have signs saying: "To kill yourself, please set to high, insert your head, and jam something in the safety".

      Seriously though - stupid people don't read warning labels or signs. I find it annoying that most manufacturers dumb down the manuals for the stupid people, when the stupid people never read them anyway. I liked the old school manuals with schematics and technical stuff (see the Apple II manuals).

      The guy from your college was unlucky (given he had some reason to assume it'll be ok). Stuff happens. You go through life taking estimated risks - since life is too short to check everything ( some people would get into the pond without diving first though).

      But the kid? Probably just helping to improve the gene pool. Sad that he had to give his life to do so, but might be better in the long run. I'm sure the smarter kids learnt something (learn from other peoples mistakes - life is too short to only learn from your own mistakes).

      --
    151. Re:warning labels by Unique2 · · Score: 1

      My first real world demonstration of why conductor size matters was when I rewired my Sinclair C5, I was only 12 or so. The C5 was basically a washing machine motor and a car battery. The original switch on mine had stopped working, "No problem" thought I, I'll just replace it with this small car brake light switch - it even had wires attached. A few twists later and the circuit was complete. My step-brother was the first to test the new wiring, he got maybe a lap of the track we had set before it burst into plumes of smoke and he jumped out and rolled away. The thin switch wire had been resting on top of the battery, the current turned this into a very hot wire indeed and cut part way through it! Thinking about it now, someone could have been seriously injured, but hey, that wasn't the first or last time something bad could have happened in my youth :)

      --
      No trees were harmed in the posting of this message. However, a great number of electrons were terribly inconvenienced.
    152. Re:warning labels by craagz · · Score: 0
      It is the basic difference between humans and animals that we protect the week in our society. Survival of the fittest does apply to humans but in practice it is the animals that observe it by instinct.

      There a lot of underprivileged humans who can be stupid. stupidity doesn't mean that person should seize to exist. Rather it is the responsibility of the people of strength to protect these stupid people.

      Of course they shouldn't. If someone is so brain damaged that they can't figure out that a SAW can hurt them, why shouldn't they suffer the consequences?
      Just a scenario, A saw makes a lot of noise (very don't-mess-with-me-or-I-will-hurt-you kind of noise). What if a deaf guy approaches the Saw while it is running and doesn't find labels warning him of approaching a dangerous object?? Is he stupid? Brain damaged? or Underprivileged?
    153. Re:warning labels by Eivind · · Score: 1

      No it is not reasonable. Not in the least.

      It is not reasonable to expect, or put in, a warning because some person has at some point managed to hurt themselves by doing something. Often the reason is simply that there are IDIOTS out there. We don't put warnings on forks saying "Do not poke into eye", despite the fact that undoubtedly, someone has at some point managed to do precisely that.

      The pool is an inflatable pool, for kids. It is circular, aproximately 4 feet across and aproximately 10 inches deep. I don't doubt that at some point some person has hurt himself trying to dive into such a pool, but that is trough being an idiot, not because he/she had a REASONABLE expectation of the pool being a safe deep diving-area.

      We can discuss where the limits are for what people can be expected to already know. But things like "it's bad to hold metallic objects and touch live wires with them" or "it's not a good idea to dive headfirst into 10 inches of water" or "putting metals in a microwave is a bad idea" or "If you jump from a 10 story building, impact may harm you" should be common knowledge. If it isn't the fault is entirely with the knowledge of the person performing this idotic feat, not with the manufacturer of the metallic object, 10inch pool, microwave or 10 story building.

    154. Re:warning labels by sumdumass · · Score: 1

      Or someone forgets how powerful it is and lays it on the ground for a second while looking for something and accidentally starts a forest fire or two.

      Can you imagine having some frayed ends on your clothing somewhere and catching your cloths on fire?

    155. Re:warning labels by Lars+Clausen · · Score: 1

      A torch makes perfect sense.
      They used torches before electricity and lanterns to light up dark areas. And to set fire to things before sticking in the pitchforks.

      -Lars
    156. Re:warning labels by Lars+Clausen · · Score: 1

      Last time I bought an extension cord it had 4 different warning labels I had to take off. I wonder how many warning labels this flashlight will carry?
      Welcome to the Nanny Nation. I bought a folding step ladder while I lived in the US. It had eleven (11) warning labels on it. I think two or three of them were the same, but still... There's nothing mysterious about a step ladder like there is about electricity.

      -Lars
    157. Re:warning labels by pcgabe · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If I owned one of these lights, I would have a sticker on it that said "DO NOT POINT AT FACE. EVER. SRSLY."
      Negative warnings lack effectiveness. For better results, use phrases like:

      "If you want faces to melt, point this at them."
      "For a free trip to the hospital, stick hand in beam."
      "Look directly into the light, and you'll never have to see your parents again!"
      --
      Don't put advice in your sig.
    158. Re:warning labels by sumdumass · · Score: 1

      It doesn't really have to be a orange sticker. Something like a trick switch that isn't obvious to operate and an engraved warning with instructions to turn it on and off would suffice.

      Actually, a tricked switch might be beneficial, you don't wan't something accidently rolling around and hiting it, turning it one and melting the interior of your car or catching it on fire when transporting it. Similarly, you wouldn't want it getting turned on by accident on a drawer or something is it stored in. I can see the need to be careful in how or where you keep it.,

    159. Re:warning labels by xbytor · · Score: 1

      When I read this post, I heard the voice of Hank Hill...

    160. Re:warning labels by KefabiMe · · Score: 1

      I don't think this is a case of trying to stop stupid people from being stupid, but more for educating the general public.

      When new-fangled technology comes out, most the population doesn't know anything about it. Electricity is a perfect example of this. The only reason why we all grew up knowing the dangers of electricity is because there has been an effort in educating the general population about it. People used to die much more often from electrocution, not because they were stupid, but because they didn't know a wet toaster or a wet hair dryer could be a problem. At one point in time, MOST people didn't know that!

      This is in fact one of the reasons why it can seem so hard to get third-world country's standard of living up. How can you train an entire country something we consider basic, like the dangers of electricity, without warning labels? (Heaven forbid if most of the population isn't literate)

    161. Re:warning labels by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Warning labels don't protect those of us with two neurons to rub together; They keep people in the gene pool who Darwin-the-Lifeguard needs to toss out ASAP.

      I see. I suppose you suggest placing a "Pick me up" label instead of a warning?

      D i a b o l i c !
    162. Re:warning labels by Spacezilla · · Score: 1

      Wouldn't a mirror do the trick?

    163. Re:warning labels by pla · · Score: 1

      How did you gain the common sense in the first place about something that is listed on a warning label?

      With most common dangers around the house, I learned them "experimentally" long before I could read.

      Don't play with knives or broken glass, they make you bleed. Don't touch the stove, it hurts. Don't stick keys in an outlet, they makes you feel all painfully tingly and get hot. Don't stare at the sun, it makes dots in your field of vision that take a few day (if ever) to go away. Don't put food in the radiators, it will smell bad.



      I don't see how anyone can reasonably argue against the inclusion of warning labels.

      Because as I illustrate above, the people that might actually benefit from them, can't. I suppose another target group exists, people who do know better, but they won't obey the label either - Quite the opposite, you'll see people like them on shows like Jackass, seeing how long they can stare into the beam.



      It's even more foolish to believe that just because you know something that it will follow that you will automatically apply it to every situation where it arises.

      And there, this goes from "ignorance", as you point out, to stupidity.

      We can't "learn" that cutting our own hearts out with a rusty spoon will hurt. We have to apply the lesser knowledge that cutting yourself on a paring knife hurts, and extend it to a much bigger hurt.

      Similarly, we know that very bright lights can hurt us. While most flashlights can't, some can. Even a good maglite would cause discomfort if you stare right into the beam; Anyone who shines this right into their eyes before testing it out on a nearby wall, I will unrepentantly call "stupid", not "ignorant of the danger".

    164. Re:warning labels by Alioth · · Score: 1

      The article (and the site that sells it) are utterly useless and don't even give a spec on what the lamp actually is. From the video, when they turn the light off it dims down like a hot halogen light. I suspect it's just a halogen bulb rated at a couple of hundred watts - and it's just the heat of the bulb close up, rather than the actual light itself that's setting stuff on fire. A 300W halogen lamp will set things on fire that are close to it with ease, but only because the filament gets extremely hot and is kicking out enough IR to set things on fire that are right close to it.

    165. Re:warning labels by Jarik_Tentsu · · Score: 1

      Let's not forget, it also protects them from law. That way if someone sues for "I burnt my arm by putting it directly on the light" they can say "Yeah, but we said not to...we didn't actually expect someone would *do* it..."

    166. Re:warning labels by jamesfalloon · · Score: 1

      What about F: attatch a sign that reads "do not look into laser with remaining eye"

    167. Re:warning labels by Wild+Wizard · · Score: 2, Informative

      Unless the computer hardware is 110V only it should be able to accept almost any input from 90V to 300V AC or even DC.

      Modern switch mode power supplies are rather versatile, just not the ones that still have a voltage selector switch (flick it if you dare)

      For example here in Australia on 240V we lost a phase on the 11KV line to the local neighborhood transformer, the resulting output was around 110V per phase. The computers didn't blink but the fridge stopped working and our server on a UPS ended up without power due to the UPS been unable to cope with the situation.

    168. Re:warning labels by flappinbooger · · Score: 1

      This flashlight would make for a great CSI episode plot.

      "The flashlight did it!" "No, you're crazy, Grissom!" "No, really, stand still right here!" "AAAAHHHHHRRGGG!"

      --
      Flappinbooger isn't my real name
    169. Re:warning labels by bball99 · · Score: 1

      - or driven an automobile? :-)

    170. Re:warning labels by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      'Current', perhaps?
      'Amperage' indeed...

    171. Re:warning labels by roman_mir · · Score: 1

      F) Profit from a frivolous lawsuit against the company that sold you the thing without upgrading your brain to IQ above 100.

    172. Re:warning labels by glindsey · · Score: 1

      Why shouldn't it have a shit load of warning labels?

      Well, because anyone paying $300 for the world's brightest flashlight didn't buy it just so they can find their way to the electric panel after a breaker blows. They bought it because it can melt plastic. Thus, telling them as much merely insults us all, rather than providing any potential safety to the end user. Because there's no possible way that this 4100 lumen torch, which looks like an ordinary Mag-Lite, might make its way into the hands of somebody who didn't purchase it himself and doesn't know what it is?

      A warning label saying "Caution: This beverage might be HOT" is stupid. A warning label saying "Caution: THIS IS NOT ACTUALLY A MAG-LITE AND WILL CAUSE THINGS YOU POINT IT AT TO SPONTANEOUSLY COMBUST" is not.
    173. Re:warning labels by glindsey · · Score: 1

      Quiz time - You just bought a cool black anodized aluminum high-powered flashlight, with a huge ugly orange sticker on the handle warning you not to look at the beam. Do you:

      B) Remove that sucker before you even put in the batteries, I, too, worry about the aesthetic and artistic coordination of my tools at the expense of safety. Why, just last night I was peeling the warning labels off of my table saw because they didn't match the metallic blue post-industrial motif I was really aiming for.

    174. Re:warning labels by Ultra64 · · Score: 1

      Again, if he can't figure out that a sharp cutting object hurts, then yes.

    175. Re:warning labels by hey! · · Score: 1
      Well, depending on the wording of the sticker, it can add to the cachet, e.g.:

      DANGER: This flashlight is powerful enough to ignite flammable materials, or to cause grievous injury or death when directed at a person. DO NOT POINT THIS AT A PERSON. DO NOT POINT THIS AT ANY OBJECTS CLOSER THAN TEN FEET. DO NOT ALLOW CHILDREN TO USE THIS. TO PREVENT ACCIDENTAL USAGE, STORE THIS DEVICE IN A LOCKED CABINET WITH BATTERIES REMOVED.


      Well, that sticker is never going to be taken off, especially by the kinds of people who would buy it.
      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    176. Re:warning labels by goofballs · · Score: 1

      Only if asked "in degrees, what temperature is hot coffee", because people have no fucking clue what constitutes "drinkable" temperatures, they only know that it's made with boiling water so they ignorantly would say (like you) "closer to boiling, more than 175 degrees*". And, no, you wouldn't
      Really, the moral here is that just because you think you know something doesn't mean you do.

      * 176 degrees is exactly half way between 140 and 212, and water that temperature could easily strip the skin off the roof of your mouth i didn't say people would drink it right away! when you make a 'hot' liquid, yes, you make it with boiling water. then you put it in a cup. and wait a little. then take a *little* sip to see if it's too hot. it's really not that complicated, and only total dumbasses would do otherwise.
    177. Re:warning labels by argStyopa · · Score: 1

      "the reason that extension cord you bought had 4 different warning labels on it was because of morons that do something completely stupid, and then blame the manufacturer for not having a warning label telling you not to do it."

      Wrong. Lots of people blame crap on irrelevant and unrelated things from ignorance to superstition (I lost the game because I didn't have my lucky socks on!).

      If I electrocute myself because I've tried to cut through the power cord with a scissors, sure, I can blame the manufacturer all I want for not preventing it.

      THE CULPRITS IN THIS DRAMA ARE NOT THE IGNORANT SCHMUCKS THAT BLAME SOMEONE ELSE FOR SOMETHING THAT THEY DID. That's probably unavoidable. THE CULPRITS ARE THE LAWYERS WHO CHEERFULLY TAKE AND PROSECUTE THESE CASES IN OUR CIVIL COURTS. Lawyers are supposed to be officers of court; Judges should be able to throw out nonsensical or stupid frivolous lawsuits AND censure the lawyers involved for wasting everyone's time and money, including (let's say after 3 strikes) permanent disbarment. We're PAYING them to make intelligent use of our legal system, and they are milking it for their own personal gain.

      --
      -Styopa
    178. Re:warning labels by mikael · · Score: 1

      Er no, this is one of my biggest pet peeves living in the States. You KNOW you're going to need to light a room, why the heck don't they put lights in the ceiling!

      Ceiling lamps have their advantages and disadvantages. Even with the standard 60 watt/100 watt light bulbs, they always seem to go out with a pop on that rainy night when you have just come home and want to put your feet up. And you have to be careful not to get the screw-thread bulbs mixed up with the bayonet-style fitting, or that the bulb gets too hot and sets fire to the lamp-shade.

      However, Europe is aiming to outlaw the standard bulbs and replacement them with fluorescent tube lamps instead.

      --
      Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
    179. Re:warning labels by Pojut · · Score: 1

      Interesting point you touch on...when it comes to consumer lawsuits, most of the playing field is grey (although there are some very obvious black and white spots on it as well)

    180. Re:warning labels by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yep, I have one of those, it's tall, the bulb sits in a dish that points the light up at the ceiling to provide indirect lighting to the room. One day I was messing around with a camera, and decided to try putting something over top of the dish to adjust the lighting in the room to a specific degree. Good thing I didn't walk away to try something else, because there was smoke pouring out of it in less than a minute, in spite of the safety screen covering the bulb. Those suckers get really hot.

    181. Re:warning labels by SvnLyrBrto · · Score: 1

      "the next poor sap who picks it up" is either a friend of mine, to whom I've loaned the flashlight and I'd have explained the risk. Or it's a *thief* who's stolen the flashlight. And who the hell really CARES if he burns his face off?

      Either way, there's not much need for a warning label.

      cya,
      john

      --
      Imagine all the people...
    182. Re:warning labels by TheClam · · Score: 1

      The problem with that logic is that this device can allow dumbasses to remove other people, with the brains to survive, from the gene pool.

      Sure, we hope they'll point this at themselves, but what if they miss and hit you square in the face?

    183. Re:warning labels by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do not look into laser with remaining eye.

      - R

    184. Re:warning labels by innerweb · · Score: 1

      At that point, I'd rather have the Nuclear powered backpack. Think of all the fun you could have with that.

      InnerWeb

      --
      Freud might say that Intelligent Design is religion's ID.
    185. Re:warning labels by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My dad wired his whole house by touching the wires to see if they were "hot". It doesn't do much damage as long as it's going in and out of the same finger, but whatever you do don't grab one wire with one hand and the other with the other hand -- this is what's known as a "defibrilator". And I sympathize with getting across 220v -- did that once unplugging a dryer, and yes it will make your hand move unvoluntarily. Took about half an hour to get the adrenaline settled down...

    186. Re:warning labels by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Posting anonymously as I don't want to waste my moderation from above, but you CAN bring water onto your flight. You cannot though bring water through the security check. I know some of you are saying well that's dumb, how can you get it onto the flight without taking it through security. Easy, you either buy bottled water after you go through security which is a tremendous waste of money, or you just bring a water container (I use a nalgene, or one of my platypus bags from when I hike) then fill the container up at a water fountain. I've never heard anyone complain while about it while I've flown.

    187. Re:warning labels by syukton · · Score: 1

      That really is an excellent book, and I often forget things like labels being signs of bad design.

      Realistically, this thing is a weapon. You don't want it to light up slowly in the event that it needs to be used as a weapon; you want to blind an attacker/invader instantly without question or hesitance. Detectors for cornea reflection would probably be infeasible without significantly increasing the cost and bulkiness of the unit. I don't know about a thermostat, because flashlight bulbs in general get hot, it's actually getting hot that causes them to produce light.

      I think the best idea is to make the beam more widely dispersed by default. Kind of like how you can twist a maglite to focus the beam, the twisting action could adjust beam focus as well as turn the light on/off. The light would always turn off when it is at its most dispersed and when turned on it would again be at maximum dispersion.

      --
      Reinvent the wheel only at either a lower cost, greater effectiveness, or your own personal enrichment and satisfaction.
    188. Re:warning labels by sjames · · Score: 1

      I don't see how anyone can reasonably argue against the inclusion of warning labels. No matter how stupid you seem to think the people are that the labels target, it seems to me that to argue against warning those people is even more stupid. The tragedy of that stance is compounded by the fact that *every one of us* does, has, and will, benefit from such warnings from time-to-time.

      As warning labels become more common, people will come to think that whatever stupid thing they're about to do must be safe since there's no label that says not to.

      Once people get used to ignoring the terribly obvious warning labels, how do you make note of a NON-obvious hazard so that people will see it?

      The one I really wonder about is "silica gel, do not eat". Why in the world would anyone think the little packet of gritty stuff packed with the new TV is meant to be a snack?

      At one time we were expected to know that water and electricity don't mix. Placing appendages into a whirling blade screams bad idea.

    189. Re:warning labels by sjames · · Score: 1

      In general, maximum amperage ratings are presumed to be for continuous use and that under that rating, the cord will not get hot enough to burn anything that may lay over it. The rating should assume room temperature unless the cord is intended for severe duty in which case the amperage rating should be at the maximum temperature rating.

      Given the odds of a typical extension cord being in a liquid nitrogen bath, there's little point in using that as a reference for the maximum current. Besides that, many would have their insulation fail at that temperature.

    190. Re:warning labels by gwait · · Score: 1

      Don't assume that because the hot extension cord was at thermal equilibrium that it was also stable.
      There is an inherent thermal runaway possible that could wait for just the right combination of a rise in ambient air temperature,
      and a mild "up" fluctuation in the line voltage that puts the cord into a flash point at any time.
      (Higher temp means more resistance, means more heat dissipation means even higher temp - loop till on fire).

      I once was working on a prototype electronic circuit board that had a tantalum capacitor in backwards.
      Nothing happened for a few months, then it finally blew like a bit of fireworks a few inches from my face.

      --
      Bavarian Purity Law of Rice Krispie Squares: Rice Krispies, Marshmallows, Butter, Vanilla.
    191. Re:warning labels by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      WARNING: This light burns shit. Do not give to pyromaniacs.

    192. Re:warning labels by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nor was their anything telling me I shouldn't plug a coffee pot, a space heater, and a PS3 onto the same cord! I should sue their asses!" This is kind of a valid example, since it is not obvious how much power the cord could handle nor how much the devices draw. Of course, building the cord with an inline fuse would be much more useful than a warning sticker ... these seem to be required now for holiday light strings, so why not extension cords?
  5. oh deary me by Mipoti+Gusundar · · Score: 0, Funny

    The goggle's - they are not doing nothing!

    --
    Will code for new sig.
    1. Re:oh deary me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This goes right into the hall of shame of meme quoting...

  6. Lumens War by blankaBrew · · Score: 4, Funny

    Now begins the lumens war.

    1. Re:Lumens War by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Begun the lumens war has.

  7. This is actually a good idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Think how much longer your batteries will last by using the light from the fires you start.

  8. In other news... by Char-i-o's · · Score: 3, Funny

    a series of self-ignitions has been reported across the country...

  9. Power Ouchage by zgregoryg · · Score: 1, Funny

    Dang, the lights went out. Now where is my dissertation? Oh crap!

  10. But what is the point? by apathy+maybe · · Score: 5, Insightful

    OK, I can understand having rather bright spotlights (for example, to go shooting), but I cannot understand what use this sort of light has for civilian usage.

    It is far to dangerous to do many of the things that you often do with bright lights (for example, to go shooting), and so why?

    Perhaps it says something in the article? Not that I can see... (Though it does say, 15 minute battery life! WTF is the point of it then?)

    --
    I wank in the shower.
    1. Re:But what is the point? by Broken+scope · · Score: 1

      Um, I thought spotlighting was illegal. Then again you may be using shooting differently from me.

      --
      You mad
    2. Re:But what is the point? by show+me+altoids · · Score: 3, Insightful

      What use is a newborn baby? -- Benjamin Franklin

      --
      I feel sorry for people that don't drink, because when they get up in the morning, that's as good as they're gonna feel
    3. Re:But what is the point? by jockeys · · Score: 1

      but I cannot understand what use this sort of light has for civilian usage. It is far to dangerous to do many of the things that you often do with bright lights
      It doesn't need a use, it needs a market. People don't NEED hummers, either, but people buy them all the time. And what do you want to bet that the kinetic energy generated by a hummer at 70mph is more dangerous than a flashlight, no matter how bright?

      Though it does say, 15 minute battery life! WTF is the point of it then?
      This is not too uncommon for tactical flashlights. Most of mine only get 20-40 minutes of light before they are drained. The idea is to not run it all the time, but in bursts.
      --

      In Soviet Russia jokes are formulaic and decidedly non-humorous.
    4. Re:But what is the point? by Jaysyn · · Score: 4, Funny

      They grow up to be taxpayers.

      - Every other politician

      --
      There is a war going on for your mind.
    5. Re:But what is the point? by swillden · · Score: 1

      Um, I thought spotlighting was illegal.

      Depends on what you're hunting, and where. In many areas you can hunt certain varmints with a spotlight.

      This light wouldn't be a useful spotlighting tool, though.

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    6. Re:But what is the point? by Torvaun · · Score: 2, Funny

      Sure it would, and the meat's already cooked by the time you get there to field dress it.

      --
      I see your informative link, and raise you a pithy comment.
    7. Re:But what is the point? by Simon+(S2) · · Score: 1

      but I cannot understand what use this sort of light has

      IT BURNS THINGS!!!11
      --
      I just don't trust anything that bleeds for five days and doesn't die.
    8. Re:But what is the point? by FleaPlus · · Score: 1

      I wonder how useful it would be for self-defense. It's tricky trying to assault somebody if you can't even look in their direction.

    9. Re:But what is the point? by Notquitecajun · · Score: 2, Funny

      Ummm...HEAT RAY!!

      Did you NOT read/listen to/see/experience War of the Worlds? You're the FIRST puny human I'm using this thing on! And no common cold is gonna stop me!

    10. Re:But what is the point? by Stereodude · · Score: 2, Insightful

      First of all, it's not that bright. A pair of 35W HID headlights on a car put out more lumen than this thing. A 35W HID 4200k bulb will put out about 3200 Lumen. There are people playing around with lights with 400W HID bulbs (10x this thing) and brighter.

    11. Re:But what is the point? by MBGMorden · · Score: 1

      He did say "varmints". Varmints are generally killed for number reduction, not for food, so there is no need to field dress ;).

      Prime example: coyotes. Around here you can shoot them any time you can legally have a gun in your hand so (so shotguns during turkey season, rifles during deer season, .22lR or shotgun during small game season, etc). The DNR (Department of Natural Resources) encourages the killing of any coyote on sight because they are not native to the habitat here and they are wrecking havoc on the ecosystem. When you kill those you generally are just looking to dispose of it somewhere non-offensive (or often if it's in the middle of the woods, just leave it - mother nature will take it's course soon enough). Some people do keep the pelts, but it's not common.

      --
      "People who think they know everything are very annoying to those of us who do."-Mark Twain
    12. Re:But what is the point? by steelfood · · Score: 1

      (for example, to go shooting)

      And set the forest on fire while you're at it.

      --
      "If a nation expects to be ignorant and free in a state of civilization, it expects what never was and never will be."
    13. Re:But what is the point? by carp3_noct3m · · Score: 1

      Being a recently honorably discharged Marine, I can tell you that for civilians, the main application of this could be self defense. On the military scale though, bright lights (usually surefires, but some knock-offs make it in there) are extremely useful in combat and hostage/raid situations. Imagine being an terrorist in your house at night (prime times for raids) and all of a sudden you have the sun in your face, its disorienting and could make you that many more seconds slow to reach for your AK and too late your zip tied up already. Done it a handful of times myself, and it works. But this flashlight seems to be too big for mounting on a rifle and I didn't see any attachments for it, so maybe its just a novelty value? Regardless, I dont see much value other than some sort of offensive (combat) or defensive (shine light in robbers eyes while hubby gets the gun) applications.

      --
      "It's ok, I'm completely secure as long as my iron is off"
    14. Re:But what is the point? by iamdrscience · · Score: 1

      but I cannot understand what use this sort of light has for civilian usage.
      Well then you sir, suffer from a lack of imagination.
    15. Re:But what is the point? by Quiet_Desperation · · Score: 1

      Dude, it's the closest thing ANY of us are going to get to a light saber.

    16. Re:But what is the point? by kimvette · · Score: 1

      By that token, what is the point of the high-power laser pointer?

      I for one want one of those flashlights. Certainly not enough to spend $300 on one, but I do want one. Why? Why not? I have a five-cell mag light and it's not bright enough.

      --
      The Christian Right is Neither (Christian nor right). See: Matthew 23, Matthew 25, Ezekiel 16:48-50
    17. Re:But what is the point? by Soft+Cosmic+Rusk · · Score: 1

      It's tricky trying to assault somebody if your face is melting and your hair and clothes are on fire...

    18. Re:But what is the point? by merreborn · · Score: 1

      I cannot understand what use this sort of light has for civilian usage.
      Honestly? In the last few years, high-power flashlight collecting has become a very popular hobby. The guy who runs http://candlepowerforums.com/ (a popular flashlight collecting forum) gets insane amounts of traffic.

      As far as I know, that's pretty much the extent of it.
    19. Re:But what is the point? by meringuoid · · Score: 2, Funny
      Ummm...HEAT RAY!! Did you NOT read/listen to/see/experience War of the Worlds? You're the FIRST puny human I'm using this thing on! And no common cold is gonna stop me!

      * ring ring. ring ring. *

      Hello. Yes. Get me the First Lord of the Admiralty, would you? I need to have a word with the Navy. Thanks awfully. Yes, I'll hold... ... ... Ah, hello Sir Rupert. Yes, we've got a bit of a flap on down near Foulness. Yes. Somebody with a... very intense light beam of some kind, setting fire to shipping. Yes, it's a new one on me too. Amazing what they think up. Well, y'see, it's not going to be long before they get the pictures on the old television, and we really have to look like we're doing something about it... HMS Thunder-Child is free? You'll shell the source of the beam? I say, that's wonderful. It'll look quite dashing on the six o'clock news all right. Well, terrific. Best of luck to you all, and give them a couple of shells from me too! Cheerio!

      --
      Real Daleks don't climb stairs - they level the building.
    20. Re:But what is the point? by Dmala · · Score: 1

      It doesn't need a use, it needs a market. People don't NEED hummers, either, but people buy them all the time. And what do you want to bet that the kinetic energy generated by a hummer at 70mph is more dangerous than a flashlight, no matter how bright?

      Right, but the point is that if I use a Hummer like I would any other car, it will still get me where I need to go with roughly the same speed and safety. If I try to use this flashlight like any other flashlight, I'm likely to set my house on fire or give myself third degree burns.

    21. Re:But what is the point? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Spotlighting is typically legal for non-game hunting such as feral hogs.

    22. Re:But what is the point? by westlake · · Score: 1
      What use is a newborn baby? -- Benjamin Franklin

      Franklin was speaking about the first assents in a hot air balloon. Franklin's own "inventions" tended to be eminently practical: bifocals, lightning rods, the Franklin stove, the lending library, the volunteer fire company.

    23. Re:But what is the point? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's a tactical tool. As I have been shown by a friend: imagine you are holding a pistol with one hand and bracing it against the top of the wrist of your other hand. The flashlight is held in the bracing hand with the light pointing in the same direction as the muzzle.

      The light needs to be bright enough to blind and is only used when the decision to fire has been made. The idea is that if the attacker is going to use his weapon before they are eliminated--shooting to injure is never acceptable--then they will be doing so without the ability to see/aim.

    24. Re:But what is the point? by deanoaz · · Score: 1

      Haven't you ever been out shooting and dropped a sight adjusting screw, or piece of ammo, or maybe a contact lense on the ground. In the dark you'd never be able to find it with a normal flashlight. With this device you will have a chance, as long as you haven't melted it or exploded it with the flashlight before you find it.

      I want one.

      --
      If 'the people' in Amendment 2 are 'the state' then Amendments 1, 2, 4, 9, and 10 benefit the state, not you.
    25. Re:But what is the point? by IronChef · · Score: 1

      I shouldn't have to prove I have a good reason for wanting something. Society has to prove that there is a compelling reason for me NOT to have it, and enforcement must be supported by the letter of the law.

      Default allow, dammit.

    26. Re:But what is the point? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > People don't NEED hummers, either, but people buy them all the time. And what do you want to bet that the kinetic energy generated by a hummer at 70mph

      What, precisely, are we talking about here?

    27. Re:But what is the point? by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      Mounted on the top of your shotgun it's perfect. intruder in your home, you have a perfect view of them before you dump a couple of 12 gauge slugs in their chest. It's a safety device as far as I am concerned. the intruder cant fire on you or even see, you can tell if it's friendly or foe before hollowing them out so you dont make a mistake and kill a relative or friendly.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    28. Re:But what is the point? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How about reading that street sign as you drive by at night that is half hidden in a bush and is no longer reflective. I keep a small light in my sun visor for that purpose that is brighter than my 6D Mag light ever was.

    29. Re:But what is the point? by Estanislao+Mart�nez · · Score: 1

      Mounted on the top of your shotgun it's perfect. intruder in your home, you have a perfect view of them before you dump a couple of 12 gauge slugs in their chest.

      No you don't, because the light is too bright at close range, and it will blind you both. You want something like this for that shotgun. 60 lumens, though the bulb upgrade for 120 could well be worthwhile.

    30. Re:But what is the point? by Broken+scope · · Score: 1

      I love my small surefire. Great for walking around on a dark campus at night, especially the one time someone does try to mug you.

      --
      You mad
    31. Re:But what is the point? by Broken+scope · · Score: 1

      Really? I don't enjoy seeing animals in pain, well no more than I enjoy one of my friends in pain, but I'll be damned if a small woodland creature twitching on the ground wouldn't be funny.

      --
      You mad
    32. Re:But what is the point? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What is the point?

      To give Mulder and Scully flashlights they can see in the dark with after the cutbacks in the FBI budget for them.

    33. Re:But what is the point? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Food source?

    34. Re:But what is the point? by RedShoeRider · · Score: 1
      "Though it does say, 15 minute battery life! WTF is the point of it then?"

      They're not the first ones. If you take a look at SureFire's P61 bulb, they get 120 lumens for 20 minutes on a set of batteries. What't the point of these short-runtime ultra-bright lamps? They're useless for most homeowners, save perhaps the homeowner who keeps it next to their defensive firearm. They're priceless for a cop who wants to disorient someone for that split-second advantage, or perhaps for an entry team member who needs to light up the room NOW.

      I have the regular bulb, so I get 1 hour of runtime on a set of batteries at 65 lumens. Is that pratical for everything? No, not at all. If I need runtime, I break out my Mag-Lite. If I want daylight in my pocket, I break out the SureFire.

      --

      Chris Knight is my hero.

    35. Re:But what is the point? by Red+Flayer · · Score: 1

      Perhaps it says something in the article? Not that I can see... (Though it does say, 15 minute battery life! WTF is the point of it then?)
      15 mins + magnifying glass + neighbor's dog crapping in my yard == win.

      Except for the smell of burning fur.

      Seriously, the purpose is to prevent youths from becoming sociopaths. My friend grew up burning ants on the stoop with a magnifying glass. My friend was severely disappointed that this did not work in the morning and evening, which is what drove him to torturing rats with a hacksaw in the basement during those hours. If I, er, my friend, had one of these flashlights, he could have burnt ants at any time -- thus he never would have entered the domain of mammalian limb removal, which never would have escalated to what he did to those hobos under the bridge that night.

      /channeling Tim Burton
      --
      "Trolls they were, but filled with the evil will of their master: a fell race..." -- J.R.R. Tolkien on Olog-hai
    36. Re:But what is the point? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It could be used for bio diesel.

  11. Oblig... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    4000 lumens should be enough for anyone...

  12. oblig. by Rob+T+Firefly · · Score: 5, Funny

    Do not look into flashlight with remaining eye.

  13. Frikken sharks by h.ross.perot · · Score: 1

    .. yea; but is it waterproof? for .. you know (All together now..)

    --
    ... I'll have a Pan Galactic Gargle Blaster with a side of Plutonium Nyborg ...
  14. I have one. It doesn't seem so bright by unassimilatible · · Score: 5, Funny

    These are kind of cheap. At first it looked really bright, but I stared into it and after a while, the light is barely visible. I think it's defective.

    --
    Slashdot "libertarians": Small government for me, big government for those I disagree with. -1, I disagree with you
    1. Re:I have one. It doesn't seem so bright by Mr.+Sketch · · Score: 2

      Is that when the headaches started?

    2. Re:I have one. It doesn't seem so bright by amirulbahr · · Score: 0

      You still managed to make a post. It must be defective.

    3. Re:I have one. It doesn't seem so bright by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Even cheaper yet is the "ghetto" ultra-bright light source I invented back in grade school. (This goes back to the late 1980s.) Get one of the blinker bulbs from a x-mas light string (the minilight kind), then get four 9v batteries. It has to be a blinker, because otherwise the filament goes poof as soon as the juice from four 9v's hits it. But don't worry about the blink, at that much voltage it actually strobes pretty fast. Also avoid looking at the thing or touching the glass part. lol.

      Only thing is that it wasn't all that practical to rig or use. But I'm sure with proper electronics and an enclosure it'd be more useful than trying to hold the wire to some batteries while holding it off to the side so it doesn't blind you.

  15. 15 minutes? by KublaiKhan · · Score: 2, Insightful

    With as little a battery life as that thing has, what real practical use could you get out of it?

    Or are they anticipating the availability of those new high-capacity batteries with the nanosilicon structures in 'em?

    It seems more and more apparent that the limitations of our technology are not so much money and materials, but power consumption. Much like Tim Taylor, we're always looking for 'MORE POWER!'

    --
    In Xanadu did Kubla Khan
    A stately pleasure dome decree
    1. Re:15 minutes? by AugustZephyr · · Score: 5, Funny

      You obviously have not considered the amount of fun you can have in 15 minutes with a flashlight that can light stuff on fire.

    2. Re:15 minutes? by KublaiKhan · · Score: 1

      Yes, I've considered it--not nearly enough by a factor of 4. I need at least an hour's worth of battery time with this thing, and there's no reason why I should have to keep swapping batteries...

      --
      In Xanadu did Kubla Khan
      A stately pleasure dome decree
    3. Re:15 minutes? by Morgon · · Score: 1

      When your skin is scorching, 15 minutes is a LONG TIME.

      --
      [DISCLAIMER: This post is a work of satire and should not be misconstrued as a holy text upon which to base a religion.]
    4. Re:15 minutes? by DMUTPeregrine · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It requires very close range to work. I have an oxyacetylene torch. I'll take the torch that can melt steel with a normal flashlight on the side. Cheaper and longer running too.

      --
      Not a sentence!
    5. Re:15 minutes? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Buy a bic lighter and you can do your "funny" for days.

  16. next up: TSA bans all flashlights from airplanes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    next up: terrorists develop luminescent clothes.

  17. YouTube Links by micksam7 · · Score: 1

    Since the wicked lasers page got slashdotted, here's a youtube link to all the videos.

  18. I can see it now... by PirateBlis · · Score: 2, Funny

    Are you a peeping tom? Ever get teased through those binoculars because she just won't take the rest of her clothing off? Well be teased no longer with The Torch! Burn away those pesky garmets within seconds so you can see exactly what you're spying for!

    1. Re:I can see it now... by PirateBlis · · Score: 1

      Ugh ignore this one. Stupid network said it blocked it the first time so I didn't think it posted. I re-wrote another a few posts below this which is better anyways. Just rate that one. Sorry >. Remember kiddies, posting at work is full of fail

    2. Re:I can see it now... by TemporalBeing · · Score: 1

      Tired of Peeping Toms? Does the person "watching" you drive you nuts? Well get watched no more. New from Wicked Lasers, it's The Torch!!! now, just point The Torch at that peeping Tom, press the button, and burn his/her retinas away in seconds! Do yourself a favor and see what a life free of peeping toms can be like. Buy the Torch!!! Just 60 easy payments of $5/week. Act now!

      --
      Truth is like the sun. You can shut it out for a time, but it ain't goin' away. - Elvis Presley (source: imdb.com)
    3. Re:I can see it now... by element-o.p. · · Score: 1

      Do you have nosy neighbors? Put an end to their peeping tom peskiness with The Torch :D

      --
      MCSE? No, sir...I don't do Windows. Yes, I am an idealist. What's your point?
    4. Re:I can see it now... by Neanderthal+Ninny · · Score: 1

      This can work both ways. The girl can have this and blind or burn your equipment. If this can burn with just being in the proximity of the flashlight then this will destroy any object (ie eyes, CCD, etc.) if pointed at any binocular or other light intensifying equipment.

    5. Re:I can see it now... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's all fun and games until your target sets up a Torch-based counter-surveillance device, for the express purpose of having the intense beam fire straight through your binocular lenses, which focus the deadly light into a rod of energy that sears its way right through the entire diameter of your skull. That's gotta hoit!

    6. Re:I can see it now... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That peeping tom won't stop staring at you but you refuse to close the curtains? Just buy The Torch and the next time he shows up, shine it right at his face and blind him for the rest of his life!

    7. Re:I can see it now... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you have a Peeping Tom? Ever caught someone watching you through binoculars? Well fear no more! New from Wicked Lasers, it's The Torch!!! Now, just point The Torch at your stalker, press the button and FRY those eyes!! Never fear a Peeping Tom again! Feel free to walk around your house naked! 30 easy payments of $10 per week. Act now!

  19. "Camping" by AugustZephyr · · Score: 1

    Now I can have smores in my kitchen. Hopefully not a bonfire though.

    1. Re:"Camping" by EggyToast · · Score: 1

      You weren't waiting for this to cook smores in the kitchen, were you? If so, there's this great device called a Microwave that's been around for a while. Makes marshmallows nice & gooey and heats up the chocolate pretty well, too. About 25 seconds will do ya.

    2. Re:"Camping" by QMO · · Score: 1

      I guess my microwave is defective.
      It heats up marshmallows, but it won't toast them.

      I use the broiler.
      Graham cracker square topped by chocolate square, topped by marshmallow.
      Put an array of them on a cookie sheet, broil for a few seconds (watch them the whole time).
      Perfect smores.

        We now return you to your regularly scheduled /.

      --
      Exam 4/C again. Maybe I'll do better this time.
  20. Fun toy by flatcat · · Score: 1

    Who needs a magnifying glass and a bright sunny day?

    Them ants don't stand a chance!

    Now if only I can get a set for my car to combat those HID lights. I could really burn their eyes out.

  21. New and improved by hansamurai · · Score: 3, Funny

    Let me know when you make a Fleshlight version.

    1. Re:New and improved by gnick · · Score: 2, Funny

      If you're shopping for a Fleshlight that sets things on fire, you've got some real issues to sort out...

      --
      He's getting rather old, but he's a good mouse.
    2. Re:New and improved by Alsee · · Score: 5, Funny

      Mom! Help! Come to the basement quick!
      My penis is on fire again!

      -

      --
      - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
    3. Re:New and improved by San-LC · · Score: 1

      Talk about some hot lovin'. Bow chicka wow wow.

  22. I was feeling down by ptr2004 · · Score: 1

    and this article just brightened up my day !!!

  23. Re:WOW!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

    I've been coming to Slashdot since 1998, and that is one of the most useless posts I have ever seen. Bravo, good fag.

  24. I can beat that... by Bob-taro · · Score: 4, Funny

    My invention, "An Actual Torch" can set things on fire in even less time. It also has a much more disperse beam so it illuminates a wide area. The only drawback is it has a much shorter range. But then again on the plus side, it can't be accidentally used to destroy airplanes.

    --
    Prov 9:8 Do not rebuke mockers or they will hate you; rebuke the wise and they will love you.
    1. Re:I can beat that... by antic · · Score: 1

      Just had to say that I liked how your "I can beat that..." reply comes almost directly after someone said "Let me know when you make a Fleshlight version."

      Also, that a torch that can beget a number of other light sources is a great idea... hmmm.

      --
      'Thats they exact same thing a banana wrench monkey.'
    2. Re:I can beat that... by sholden · · Score: 1

      If you watch the videos, you'll see that "an actual torch" will set things on fire at a significantly greater range...

    3. Re:I can beat that... by IronChef · · Score: 1

      It's also good against green slime and trolls, which is a plus for me.

    4. Re:I can beat that... by Guspaz · · Score: 1

      But then again on the plus side, it can't be accidentally used to destroy airplanes.

      Well, not from the outside, no.

  25. Yes but by hcdejong · · Score: 0

    does it run on Aqua Regia?

  26. Inefficient and Un-Impressed by Timberwolf0122 · · Score: 1

    Great so what percentage of the battery is being dumped out as heat? Surley an array of high bright LED's could kickout more light and almost no heat?

    --
    In the not too distant future, next Sunday A.D.
    1. Re:Inefficient and Un-Impressed by Stereodude · · Score: 1

      That's hard to say. It really depends if it's an incandescent or HID. If it's a HID then no. HID bulbs are quite efficient even compared to the latest LEDs. However, judging from the low price price I'd say it's not a HID.

    2. Re:Inefficient and Un-Impressed by Lane.exe · · Score: 1

      The heat is sort of the point. I don't want a really bright flashlight. I want a "laser."

      --
      IAALS.
  27. Oblig by navygeek · · Score: 1

    *singing off key* This little light of mine... I'm gonna let it shine... This little light of mine...

    1. Re:Oblig by CaptainCaustic · · Score: 1

      I had to read it twice. At first I thought it a was a new product called "The iTorch"
      Kind of a niche market if it was

  28. Kinda defeats the purpose.... by zoltamatron · · Score: 1

    ....of having a really bright flashlight when everything you shine it on in the dark turns black....

    --
    Tolerance does not tolerate intolerance, or hypocrisy.
  29. Stupid warning labels by Zocalo · · Score: 1

    I guess they wanted to top the warning label "Do not look into laser with remaining eye".

    If Wicked Lasers puts a sticker on there that reads "Do not look into torch with remains of skull!", this thing will probably sell like the wildfires it's going to end up starting...

    --
    UNIX? They're not even circumcised! Savages!
  30. Hum.. by mustafap · · Score: 1

    I can just see my 10 year old now: "Oh, a torch! Now a can read under the bed covers."
    There's going to be a few Darwin Awards generated from this toy.

    --
    Open Source Drum Kit, LPLC deve board - mjhdesigns.com
  31. Can a product be Slashdotted? by tripmine · · Score: 1

    I'm guessing something this awesome is going to get sold out pretty fast.

  32. A flashlight, a paperclip, a rubberband... by kaellinn18 · · Score: 1

    MacGuyver would have a field day with this thing!

    --

    --------
    This isn't the sig you're looking for. Move along.
  33. The only question is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    Will it blend?

  34. It's the Eye of Ishtar! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Now we can rescue the mole people from their subterranean overlords.

  35. 4100 Lumen is certainly no world record holder... by Stereodude · · Score: 5, Informative
    This thing is total weak sauce compared to some of the home-brew / modified flashlights people have over at the Candlepower forums. In fact one of them (Maxablaster) is featured in this month's Popular Science on the How2.0 page. Apparently Guinness will only consider production flashlights for their records.

    Regardless, I'd link to some of them, but the forums there have enough time staying up as it is and they don't need the extra traffic. Here's a beam shot of the Maxablaster shining on some clouds 4 miles up. http://img231.imageshack.us/my.php?image=spotoncloud2dp4ta1.jpg

  36. purpose? by circletimessquare · · Score: 1

    is this for mounting on the aboveforementioned railgun?

    i think the rail gun might need a padded gun stock before it needs this sighting tool though

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
  37. Re:WOW!! by Finallyjoined!!! · · Score: 1

    Wish you were. Less noise.....

    --
    If I had an Ass, I'd call it Fanny Bottom, then I could slap my Ass; Fanny Bottom, on the Arse.
  38. Reminds me of a short story I read once by kalpol · · Score: 1

    I can't remember the name of this story, but the plot was that someone had invented a fast-time bubble...you got in it and time passed extremely fast for you on the inside, making the outside world appear to be frozen, or move very very slowly. Someone stole it and ran around killing people by shining a flashlight on them from inside the field, burning them to death.

    --
    12:50 - press return.
  39. Fire? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ummmm don't we have enough forest fires?

  40. coming soon by Khashishi · · Score: 3, Funny

    waterproof shark harness

  41. I can see it now... by PirateBlis · · Score: 5, Funny

    Are you a Peeping Tom? Does the person you're "watching" often tease you through your binoculars because she won't remove that silly bra? Well get teased no more! New from Wicked Lasers, it's The Torch!!! Now, just point The Torch at your obsession, press the button, and burn away those pesky garments in seconds!!! Do yourself a favor and see what you've really wanted to see! Buy The Torch!!! 30 easy payments of $10 per week. Act now!

  42. Cool! An Anne Hathaway/Minnie Driver love scene! by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 1

    "Do not shine in eyes."

    --
    (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
  43. Galvanic Lucifer by georgewad · · Score: 1

    A mere toy in comparison to the Galvanic Lucifer.

    --
    Karma: It's not just a good idea. It's the law.
  44. Smokey the Bear 2008 by lorenlal · · Score: 1

    It looks like the DEQ is going to need to revise their Smokey commercials. First, campfires, then cigarrettes, now kids walking around with their candle of death.

    Once the weather warms up we should have a comparison of the Navy Rail gun vs. this thing over 15 minutes in a forest.

  45. ObStephenson by Dr.+Manhattan · · Score: 3, Informative

    Ah, it's no Galvanick Lucipher.

    --
    PHEM - party like it's 1997-2003!
  46. Re:WOW!! by elrous0 · · Score: 2, Funny

    I've been coming to Slashdot since 1998, and that is one of the most useless posts I have ever seen. Bravo, good fag.

    I agree.

    -Eric

    --
    SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
  47. In other news by valentyn · · Score: 1

    - speakers so loud, they can demolish buildings
    - perfume so strong, you can use it for riot control
    - food so nutricious, it will kill you

    I mean, what's the use of a flashlight so strong? Ran out of matches, is that it?

    --
    my other sig is a 500 page novel
  48. Light saber? by buzzthebattlecat · · Score: 1

    How far away are we from this. I can't wait, but I would probably chop my own arm off anyway. Remember playing with flash lights over the camp fire? You are guaranteed you to win every time.

  49. Re:Fun (Second Amendment) toy by KudyardRipling · · Score: 1

    Retrofit the diode into a laser level or a Scophony-like scanner box made from laser printer image scanner assemblies (synchronized rotating mirrors mounted at right angles to sweep a raster).

    --
    Submission as evidence constitutes plaintiff and/or prosecutorial misconduct.
  50. This is perfect by Stanistani · · Score: 1

    For a really good snipe hunt.
    Hand the victim a burlap bag and this flashlight, tell him to head out into the bush and chirp like a pig for ten minutes, and then turn on the light...

  51. Warning: Do Not Operate During Dry Season by Mikey-San · · Score: 1

    "So we went to Bobby's party and took some beers out into the woods with this new flashlight he got, and long story short, the fire department is trying their best to turn things around . . ."

    --
    Mikey-San
    Karma: +Eleventy billion (mostly affected by watching Celebrity Jeopardy)
  52. Re:WOW!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes, I see what you mean. Using these for an oral examination was a bad idea.
    But on the bright side, all my plaque is gone.

  53. Yeah, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Does it run Linux??? :-)

  54. More Oblig... by penguin_dance · · Score: 1

    You'll put your eye out!

    --
    If you've never been modded as "flamebait" or "troll," you've never tried to argue a minority viewpoint here!
  55. The Real Torches by writerjosh · · Score: 2, Funny

    Finally, the English can now truly call their flashlights "torches."

    1. Re:The Real Torches by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And with it's ultra short battery life, the Americans can keep calling them 'flash lights'.

  56. 15 minutes by Alsee · · Score: 1

    Flashlight: $299.99
    Replacement battery: $279.99
    1 hour battery 4-pack special: $999.95 (You Save Over $80!)

    -

    --
    - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
  57. Candle Watt vs Lumen by mr_rarr · · Score: 1

    Can someone tell me the difference between Candle Watt and Lumen? My friend has a 1000000 candle watt flashlight. The other day at Costco I found a 15000000 candle watt flashlight. How is this flashlight brighter?

  58. 100 times brighter? Don't think so.... by Macgyver7017 · · Score: 1

    While 4100 lumens is certainly a lot of light... Its certainly not 100 times brighter than the previous brightest flashlights. I have 100 lumen flashlights from surefire kicking around all over, and a quick visit to their site found this on the front page: http://www.surefire.com/maxexp/main/co_disp/displ/prrfnbr/419/sesent/00 (thats a 500 lumen flashlight) Anyway, all that to say, this is way over-hyped.

    1. Re:100 times brighter? Don't think so.... by melink14 · · Score: 0

      not 100 times brighter, 100 lumens brighter.

    2. Re:100 times brighter? Don't think so.... by Macgyver7017 · · Score: 1

      I stand corrected.

  59. Fry an egg on a stick? by raddan · · Score: 1

    Now that I gotta see!

  60. It Burns Us... by onkelonkel · · Score: 1

    Like the Daystar, but portable!

    --
    None of them can see the clouds; The polished wings don't care.
  61. 1m candlepower v. 4100 lm by Sebastopol · · Score: 2, Interesting

    So after wiki'ing to figure out how this compares to the Coleman 1,000,000 candle power jobber, i discover i can't just play unit games:

    candlepower is lumins / sr

    I have to focus my few remaining neurons on my job, so could someone else please explain how the two measurements compare?

    Thank-yee.

    --
    https://www.accountkiller.com/removal-requested
    1. Re:1m candlepower v. 4100 lm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    2. Re:1m candlepower v. 4100 lm by Stereodude · · Score: 1

      It doesn't really matter since that 1 million candlepower number is very likely a bogus marketing number (like almost all spotlight candlepower numbers). The 4100lm is probably an accurate bulb lumen number.

    3. Re:1m candlepower v. 4100 lm by Henry+Pate · · Score: 2, Informative

      Lumens are the total energy output of the bulb, and doesn't change even if I focus the beam.
      Think of light coming out of a flashlight as a cone, the more concentrated the light is, the higher the candlepower is.

      So when you're using a Mag light and you change the focus of the beam, you're changing the candlepower.

      Perhaps I should've written that as a car analogy....

      --
      Si Hoc Legere Scis Nimium Eruditionis Habes
  62. "Paging Louis Wu.." by R2.0 · · Score: 1

    "Your flashlight laser is ready"

    (I've been jonesing for one of these since I first read "Ringworld", and I am ready - I even know to take headshots at people wearing green)

    --
    "As God is my witness, I thought turkeys could fly." A. Carlson
  63. It's ARM by Larry Niven by Amonnil · · Score: 2, Informative

    Available in the collections Flatlander and The Long Arm of Gil Hamilton.

    1. Re:It's ARM by Larry Niven by kalpol · · Score: 1

      That's the one, thanks. Excellent story, I should get the collections and read the rest of them.

      --
      12:50 - press return.
  64. Re:4100 Lumen is certainly no world record holder. by Chabil+Ha' · · Score: 0

    A cursory Google search revealed this forum with that pic and some more interesting ones like what the flashlight looks like, the battery pack needed to power it, as well as some more illuminating photos (pun intended).

    --
    We're all hypocrites. We all have hidden parts, it's the contrast between them that make us more a hypocrite than others
  65. Just curious by mcmonkey · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Why not? I'll admit I consider most people abysmally stupid, but they should have a pretty good grasp of the idea that you can't safely run a 20ga 100ft cord from your basement to your garage "beer fridge".

    I usually think of myself as not abysmally stupid, but why can't I safely run a 20ga 100ft cord from my basement to my garage beer fridge? The purpose of the cord is to connect an outlet at one end to an appliance at the other.

    Does it matter that one end is in my basement and the other is in my garage? I know some cords are rated for outdoor use and some are not, but what if my garage is attached? Is there something intuitively obvious about 20ga cords that aren't suitable for beer fridges? And how do you know if my beer fridge is one of those little travel jobbies that can run off AC or 12-volt DC, or if my beer fridge is a full size Kenmore? (I drink a lot of beer.)

    Something so "mind-numbingly obvious" should be easy to explain. Maybe I'm just abysmally stupid.

    1. Re:Just curious by WhiteWolf666 · · Score: 5, Informative

      I'll assume this is a serious query. It isn't all that obvious.

      A 20gauge cord is most likely not capable of carrying enough amperage to power your beer fridge without either A)heating up, or B)outright failing.

      Situation A: A 100ft cord that heats up to unsafe temperatures may start a fire with any number of low-flashpoint items between your garage and basement.

      Situation B: Failing outright means that the cord heats up to sufficient temperatures in order melt the insulation off, exposing bare, high-temperature, semi-high voltage wires to the environment. They may spark, which can easily start a fire, the insulation might burn or char, and the exposed wires represent an electrocution hazard. This would be unsafe for a 4ft core, but a 100ft cord represents a line of death stretching the length of your house.

      Take a look at http://www.interfacebus.com/Reference_Cable_AWG_Sizes.html . Those are conservative numbers for load carrying capacity, and deemed "safe" for 100ft or longer runs. You can potentially multiply those numbers by 2-3 for shorter runs.

      Even so, 20 gauge wire should really only be used for a 2-6 amp load; and on the lower end of that scale for a longer (100 ft+) run. A pretty average, smallish home fridge has a "max" current draw of 15 amps. Even your beer-mini-fridge probably draws 7-8 peak. 7-8 is greater than 2, and as such, is a fire hazard. And, with a 100ft run, most people would probably stick it under a rug, which results in even MORE heat buildup.

      The thing about it that makes it worse is that the circuit breaker will only protect you against over-current based upon the wiring load (assuming the electrician did a good job), not electrical cords, particularly wimpy electric cords. The only time the circuit breaker will kick in is after the electrical cord has shorted, and it may be too late by that point. If its a ground fault, and not a fire, and not an electrocution, a GFCI circuit might protect you, but it'll probably be too late for that, as well.

      That all being said, it's not common knowledge; but it should be. It takes a bit to educate yourself on this stuff, but its important knowledge, and a lot of lives could be saved, and fires stopped, if they taught this stuff in highschool.

      IMHO, its a bit pretentious to say that this, stuff is "common sense". The little endian nature of the gauge scale (not to mention that it is logarithmic so 19 gauge is 2x the diameter of 20 gauge), and the unclear nature of the warnings on the stuff is kinda useless. It would make far more sense to make the Amperage of all devices clearer (peak), and simply put "This cable can carrying X amps at Y temperature, and is unsafe for use at higher temperatures" on extension cables.

      --
      WhiteWolf666 an exBush supporter. All you new-school,compassionate,save the children Republicans can rot in hell
    2. Re:Just curious by evanbd · · Score: 1

      You check the amp requirements of the fridge, and the rated amperage of the cord. If the former is higher than the latter, don't use that combination. 20 gauge is probably rated around 4 amps (the exact number will depend on insulation etc) -- barely enough for lamp cord, which is usually 18 gauge.

    3. Re:Just curious by Chirs · · Score: 2, Informative

      For long distances you may also need to take into account voltage drop...the cord itself may be fine but it may not be able to provide the proper voltage at the far end. Going one size thicker is usually sufficient to deal with this.

    4. Re:Just curious by uglyduckling · · Score: 2, Informative

      All cables have a resistance, which can be quoted as ohms per metre. So a cable that works fine for a 3m distance may well drop the voltage significantly over a 20-30m run. Thick conductors of the same material have a lower resistance per metre, so in general it's better to use the thickest cable you can for runs of more than a couple of metres, if you're going to be drawing a significant amount of power. (Significant means anything with a heater or a motor, or multiple small pieces of equipment). You can think about it like water pipes - narrow pipes will be at a higher pressure to deliver the same volume of water per second. It's also worth remembering that the energy lost by the voltage drop has to go somewhere, and that somewhere is heat. Depending on where the cables are run this could be a safety issue.

      Having said that I would expect your little beer fridge actually draws very little current and wouldn't be a problem on a narrow guage cable.

    5. Re:Just curious by richard.cs · · Score: 1

      Of course in the UK this is pretty much a non-issue. There are fuses in the plugs which protect the cable from overheating if someone puts a big heater or something on a wimpy 5 amp cable (the lowest rating I've seen on an extension lead). It can still be a problem with cables that are tightly coiled up and can't dissipate the heat so well but in general the worst that happens if someone overloads an extension lead is the fuse blows.

      Of course the higher voltage helps as well by reducing the current the cables need to carry. Over here they typically state the maximum current they can take and I've seen one with two ratings marked on it - one for with the lead coiled up and one for fully uncoiled. Conductor sizes and voltage ratings are commonly be molded into the cable insulation though.

    6. Re:Just curious by oldhack · · Score: 0
      Of course in the UK this is pretty much a non-issue. There are fuses in the plugs which protect the cable from overheating...

      You guys put fuse into every extension cord?

      --
      Fuck systemd. Fuck Redhat. Fuck Soylent, too. Wait, scratch the last one.
    7. Re:Just curious by Actually,+I+do+RTFA · · Score: 1

      You guys put fuse into every extension cord?

      You have to when you have guest like these spilling tea everywhere, shorting out wires.

      --
      Your ad here. Ask me how!
    8. Re:Just curious by mcmonkey · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the detailed reply.

      My query was semi-serious--I really don't know why I shouldn't run a beer fridge on a 20ga 100ft extension cord. I do know wire gauge numbers are such that bigger umber means smaller wire, but I don't know how small a 20ga wire is.

      My point is, for those who like to say RTFM, for consumer items user manuals and warning labels are TFM.

      Anything is obvious if you have the requisite knowledge. Like those little laser pointers. Obviously those are safe to point at the eyes--that skinny little beam, must be a harmless amount of energy in there. I mean, obviously those are very dangerous--that skinny little beam, must have a high energy density. (But of course how dangerous depends on the mechanics of the eye and some aspects of quantum mechanics. Obvious indeed!)

    9. Re:Just curious by brantondaveperson · · Score: 1

      A fuse into every plug, and so if your extension cord has a plug on the end (which would be fairly likely), then yes.

    10. Re:Just curious by adolf · · Score: 1

      Hogwash.

      We're talking about running a redneck beer fridge from lamp cord without anything catching fire, not about sound engineering practices. (If we were, we'd be looking for less than 3% drop, which will require approximately an extension cord of approximately 14 AWG.)

      So I'm not going to do any real math here, though I did refer to a couple of charts. (I am by no means an EE, but I do drink plenty of beer...)

      In fact, the whole thing can be surmised as follows: If I can run a fridge from a short 20 AWG extension cord without anything catching on fire, then I can also do so with any greater length of 20 AWG wire.

      The Frigidaire in my kitchen draws a stated 4.5 Amps. 200 (100x2) feet of 20 AWG cable has a resistance of about 2 Ohms, and a voltage drop at 120V of around 8 or 10 Volts. The extension cord itself will be dissipating about 50 Watts.

      50 Watts, spread across 100 feet of poorly-insulated paired copper, shouldn't cause it to become anything more than just barely warm.

      Therefore, it probably will work fine (ie: not catch fire).

      Peak current (as the compressor starts) will, of course, be much higher than 4.5A, and accordingly so will the voltage drop. But this is only for an instant until things get moving, and shouldn't cause appreciable heating of the conductors.

      So, as long as the compressor starts ticking, it'll be fine. And if it doesn't start for some reason, the compressor will overheat and shut itself down until it cools off (which only takes a few seconds, in my experience with stuck compressors).

      [ObAnecdote: I'm remodeling a house. The existing electrical wiring and service is total shit, with a couple of 30 Amp fuses running 2200 square feet worth of 14 AWG cloth insulated wire. The fridge (which, of course, is only on-site to keep the beer cold) runs just fine when operating a 6" DeWalt die grinder on the same circuit under heavy load while cutting 4" schedule 40 iron pipes. I haven't measured the voltage, but all of the lights dim substantially and stay dimmed until the grinder stops, and nothing has caught fire yet.]

      To tie this back into the context of warning labels: In any case, the redneck beer fridge is self-protecting and safe, and needs no warning label. Further, no such item as a 100' 20 AWG extension cord exists for sale in the US (because it would be unsafe given that one could plug a load of much greater than 4.5 amps into it -- see above about good engineering practices).

      Therefore, any such cord would have to be constructed by the beer-drinking redneck himself, and wouldn't have warning labels anyway. The discussion is thus moot.

    11. Re:Just curious by Dun+Malg · · Score: 1

      the gauge scale ... is logarithmic so 19 gauge is 2x the diameter of 20 gauge Errrr.....no. 19AWG wire is, by the very table you link, 35.9 mils in diameter vs 32 mils for 20AWG. The ratio of successive sizes is only 1.1229322:1, not 2:1.
      --
      If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
    12. Re:Just curious by QuasiEvil · · Score: 1

      Don't exactly know how they calculated the "Current Carrying" column on your provided link, but your description of "conservative" is a massive understatement. Take 12AWG wire, for example. The National Electric Code (the baseline US building code for electrical crap) allows 20 amps via a 12AWG circuit, and you can bet that most household circuits are longer than 100ft. round trip, and that this is sized very conservatively for safety (it's a building code, and they're almost always conservative). Yet this table lists 9.3 amps for 12AWG? I believe the phrase you're looking for is "Whiskey Tango Foxtrot?"

      Also, consider the headlight wires in your car - usually either 16 or 18 gauge, and they handle 7ish amps on high. Again, not too many cars catch fire due to headlight line failure, yet this table lists them between 2.3 and 3.7A.

      The real gotcha is in the connectors, because the joints are where the resistance is - either just from the physical connection, or from inevitable corrosion buildup. That's why the cord on your space heater may be only slightly warm, but the plug is often significantly moreso.

    13. Re:Just curious by hcdejong · · Score: 1

      IMHO, its a bit pretentious to say that this, stuff is "common sense". The little endian nature of the gauge scale (not to mention that it is logarithmic so 19 gauge is 2x the diameter of 20 gauge), and the unclear nature of the warnings on the stuff is kinda useless. It would make far more sense to make the Amperage of all devices clearer (peak), and simply put "This cable can carrying X amps at Y temperature, and is unsafe for use at higher temperatures" on extension cables.

      Using SI units would make things a whole lot easier. Over here, we specify wire gauges as the diameter (in mm^2). A nice, linear scale, not some silly non-intuitive inverse log. Also, extension cords are labeled with the maximum allowed power (in W), making it easy to calculate whether it's safe for the intended application (since every appliance also has a power rating on its label). Welcome to the 21st century.

    14. Re:Just curious by rdebath · · Score: 1
      When the standard in the wall wiring can give you 30Amps at 240 volts you pretty much need a fuse to protect that skinny 13amp (or even 5amp) cable. So yes nearly every plug has a fuse in it. The good things are that there are no safety issues with a 12 way extension block and every wall socket is a double socket.

      Another good feature is that the sockets are 'shuttered' so it's rather difficult for anybody let alone a child to poke something in the socket and get a shock; this means the sockets are safe anywhere even with kids and animals. If they're directly on the floor (eg: in an office) they usually get covered with a metal dust cover when not in use. If they're outside all that's needed is a light cover against direct rain/water contact.

      The downside? The plugs are big and ugly!

    15. Re:Just curious by karlandtanya · · Score: 1

      Simple anwer is Voltage Drop.

      The wire is a resistor.
      All other things being equal, a 100' long resistor has more resistance than a 5' long resistor.

      The device at the other end is a motor, and it needs a certain amount of power.
      Pretty much any electric motor will draw more current at lower voltage when running under the same load.
      Because of this, your wire is carrying more current than a shorter wire would carry.

      Sending this current through a resistor (remember your wire is a resistor) causes it to heat up.
      And the heat from the resistor increases as the SQUARE of the increase in current. P=I^2R.
      Yes the resistance increases as the temperature rises, but that's not a major in this case.

      The manufacturer tells you that the 100' 20ga wire won't carry the current you require.
      That's not quite true.
      It will carry the current, which is the problem--the wire will then heat up and your house will burn down.

      After that, it'll stop carrying the current, so in the end they're technically correct.

      --
      "Reality is that which, when you stop believing in it, it doesn't go away." - Philip K. Dick
    16. Re:Just curious by polymeris · · Score: 1

      ...would make things a whole lot easier. Over here, we specify wire gauges as the diameter (in mm^2) How is using a quadratic scale easier than a -log scale?
    17. Re:Just curious by WhiteWolf666 · · Score: 1

      Well, they explain the calculation:

      Current Notes:
      The current shown per wire size listed above is based on 1 amp/ 700 Circular mils, other tables provide different current per wire size, and different current for open air ~ check your local electrical code for the correct current capacity [Ampacity]. The 1 amp/ 700 Circular mils seems to be the most conservative, other sites provide/allow for 1 amp per 200 or 300 Circular mil. For shot wire lengths use 1A/200 Circular mil, for longer wire runs use 300 Circular mil, and for very long wire runs use the table above, 1 amp / 700 Circular mil.

      *shrug* I guess take it with a grain of salt, electrical faults scare me, and I don't have any problem being extra conservative. I did say that you could potentially multiply the capacity number by 2x or 3x.

      --
      WhiteWolf666 an exBush supporter. All you new-school,compassionate,save the children Republicans can rot in hell
    18. Re:Just curious by hcdejong · · Score: 1

      Sorry, should have said 'cross-sectional area' instead of diameter. And the current capacity scales linearly with cross-sectional area.

  66. If oral exams leave you speechless by spun · · Score: 1

    You don't even want to know what using one of these for a colon exam will do. Especially after a big meal of Taco Bell.

    --
    - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
    1. Re:If oral exams leave you speechless by ArsenneLupin · · Score: 1

      Never shine The Torch (tm) where the sun doesn't.

  67. Re:4100 Lumen is certainly no world record holder. by Stereodude · · Score: 1

    Yeah, that's it. I wanted to avoid slashdotting the servers there, so I didn't provide a link.

  68. TSA by stuporglue · · Score: 1

    Well great. Now I'm not going to be able to bring flashlights on to airplanes. :-/

    --
    https://www.facebook.com/digitizeicm -- Show your support for the digitization of the Iron County Miner newspaper archiv
  69. Yes Officer! by johkir · · Score: 1

    Can't wait until I get pulled over and the police officer shines that in my eyes to see if I'm under the influence or some such nonsense.

    --
    These are some of the things molecules do...... given 4 billion years -Carl Sagan
  70. Re:Omg Ready... Illuminating/Eliminating--1, 2, 3 by davidsyes · · Score: 4, Funny

    1. Gives a new meaning to "Flash burn"

    2. Hit three performing singers at once and it's a "torch song trilogy"...

    3. As a method of execution.... Trial by fire... no illusions here

    --
    Previously: "Linux... Toward the Sunrise..." Now: "Linux... Toward the-- No, now, part of Every Sunrise"
  71. Gullability at its finest by MasterC · · Score: 1

    Industrial cutting lasers are a single wavelength backed by kilowatts of power. This is a flash light with a large band of light frequencies that is nowhere as coherent as a laser. I don't believe for a second that it is the light itself causing the fire. I believe it's the actual heat generated by the bulb. The site http://www.wickedlasers.com/lasers/wicked_lights-74-0.htm seems to be slashdotted so I can't get to anything resembling specifications (bulb type, battery type, etc.) to further justify my position.

    A typical 200W 120V conventional incandescent bulb puts out 3900 lumens (says the wikipedia). When was the last time you saw a 200W bulb catch something on fire because it produces just so much light? Good thing they don't make 300W or bigger: we'd have a fire just waiting to start with the flick of a switch.

    Misunderstanding of science never ceases to amaze me: it's really bright AND PORTABLE ergo the light itself is causing the fire...nevermind the filament of a conventional incandescent bulb (let alone halogen or xenon arc) is on the order of thousands of degrees. No, it has to be the light!

    My horoscope said my misanthropy for today was a 10, now I know why.

    --
    :wq
    1. Re:Gullability at its finest by Stereodude · · Score: 1
      What? I'm confused. So you're saying that the heat being made by the bulb (emission in the IR portion of the spectrum) doesn't count as light coming from the flashlight?

      BTW, 200W 120V bulbs don't light things on fire because they don't have a reflector concentrating the beam in one direction.

    2. Re:Gullability at its finest by enoz · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Seems the GP was pointing out the reality distortion inherent in the article. The summary mentions that the torch can set things alight, and that it is quite bright at 4100 Lumens. Most people at this point seemed to have connected the dots to think that the brightness is related to its setting things on fire.

      Not true.

      Lumens specifically measures the visible light, and as far as brightness goes 4100 is pretty meager for a bulb, quite good for a handheld device though. Why is that a spotlight can put out 15-25,000 lumens yet the beam does not even feel warm? Reference (PDF) (and yes, I have tested this first-hand).

      The heat generated is by a light is completely irrelevant to its lumens rating, so whilst in nerdland it is quite correct that heat is just another wavelength of light, in this case the heat and light are two separate things. The light is the 4100 lumens boast, and the heat is the invisible and unmeasured infrared source coming from the bulb.

    3. Re:Gullability at its finest by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      your first three words summarize your post nicely... moron

  72. Be Prepared by Teflon_Jeff · · Score: 1

    heck, I'm giving this to my son when he becomes a Boy Scout.

    Firestarting made easy.

    --
    "Teach a man to build a fire, and he's warm for a day. Set a man on fire and he's warm for the rest of his life."
  73. The point of the flashlight-laser: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    To aid Louis Wu in dealing with vampires on the Ringworld. Which is unstable, btw.

  74. Missing options by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    E) Do not look into flashlight with remaining face.

  75. This scares the shit out of me... by hoggoth · · Score: 1

    Because I have little kids that would not think twice about looking into the cool flashlight.

    It may be young kids who don't know better.
    It might be 14 year old assholes shining it in someone's face.
    Somewhere, sooner or later, this will burn and blind some kids.

    --
    - For the complete works of Shakespeare: cat /dev/random (may take some time)
    1. Re:This scares the shit out of me... by Stereodude · · Score: 1
      But there's a key part of the equation you're missing here. Did you actually buy one? If not, don't worry about what it might do to your kids.

      By the way, keep your kids away from your car's headlights too.

    2. Re:This scares the shit out of me... by hoggoth · · Score: 1

      > But there's a key part of the equation you're missing here. Did you actually buy one? If not, don't worry about what it might do to your kids.
      > By the way, keep your kids away from your car's headlights too.

      1. No, I didn't. I'm worried about the one lying around the house at someone else's house. Especially people without kids, who have no concept of how kids get into everything you never expected them to get into.
      2. My car's headlights won't catch their faces on fire and burn out their retinas.

      --
      - For the complete works of Shakespeare: cat /dev/random (may take some time)
    3. Re:This scares the shit out of me... by Stereodude · · Score: 1
      >1. No, I didn't. I'm worried about the one lying around the house at someone else's house. Especially people without kids, who have no concept of how kids get into everything you never expected them to get into.

      >2. My car's headlights won't catch their faces on fire and burn out their retinas.

      1) Do you think people who buy $300 flashlights leave them just sitting around where small kids can "play" with them? I have my doubts about that one. Why would your kids be at someone's house who doesn't have kids when you're not around to watch them? Are you using Michael Jackson as a babysitter or something?

      2) A 35W 4200k HID bulb puts out ~3200 Lumen. Lot of cars have 2 of these installed in them (mine does). I think you and some other people need some perspective. A 4100 lumen light isn't that bright. It won't set your kids face on fire. It might warm their face as will any other light of similar brightness. You'll notice they didn't show it lighting a white piece of paper on fire. It was very dark paper (probably a comic book). A laser pointer is much more dangerous from an eyesight and retina perspective.

    4. Re:This scares the shit out of me... by joto · · Score: 1

      Do you think people who buy $300 flashlights leave them just sitting around where small kids can "play" with them?

      Uhm, yes. People who buy this flashlight are in this respect essentially children themselves, and buy them to play with. Very few people have an actual use for a very bright flashlight with 15 minutes battery time. It's basically a show-off item, or an expensive toy for children older than 18. If I had kids, and had bought one of these, the kids would certainly be allowed to play with it, just like I would encourage them to play with matches, knives, axe, the kitchen oven, the lawnmower, etc... Under supervision of course, or at least with some guidance and some degree of trust. At some point those kids will become adults, and the sooner they are taught to be responsible with dangerous things, the better.

      A 4100 lumen light isn't that bright. It won't set your kids face on fire.

      I agree. Normal reflex would make you turn away long before you go blind. Most people survive looking at the sun just fine, and the sun is a helluva lot brighter.

    5. Re:This scares the shit out of me... by Nazlfrag · · Score: 1

      Then educate your kids, or keep it away from them, or disable it (ie. remove the bulb) when not in use. Your house is full of dangerous products - cleaning agents, kitchen knives, power outlets everywhere, yet your kids aren't poisoned, stabbed or electrocuted if you use and teach some common sense.

    6. Re:This scares the shit out of me... by Frank+T.+Lofaro+Jr. · · Score: 1

      Play with axes? I wouldn't trust most adults with that.

      As for looking at the sun, people go blind during eclipses and there is the case of the people tripping on LSD who went blind from staring at the sun, they claimed they were "having a religious conversation" with it.

      --
      Just because it CAN be done, doesn't mean it should!
    7. Re:This scares the shit out of me... by joto · · Score: 1

      Playing with axes, as in "please chop some wood", or "here's how you build something out of timber". Most adults are perfectly capable of that, as long as they are told how to do it safely. Most kids too, at least that's what we did in the boyscouts. Other forms of axe-playing, such as axe-throwing, would be fine too, as long as it's done with a focus on safety, but I wouldn't necessarily encourage it, mostly because I'm not into it myself. An axe is so obviously dangerous that most kids and adults will heed your warnings of what *not* to do with it.

      As for looking at the sun, well I wouldn't normally give my kids lsd, and would tell them to use safety glasses when looking at eclipses, just like everyone else. The reason (some very few) people damage their eyes at eclipses is because normally your reflexes make you turn away from the sun, but some morons absolutely *have* to stare at the exciting event without protection, and despite the incredibly high volume of warnings from media before such events. But yeah, I'd be hesitant to give those people an axe to play with too ;-)

  76. Tech support call by EmbeddedJanitor · · Score: 1

    Hello sir.... so you looked into the light beam and now you are blind in that eye. Can you tell us if the problem is repeatable?... Sir, sir...

    --
    Engineering is the art of compromise.
  77. tired meme is tired by whimmel · · Score: 1

    Why does every other story get tagged with 'whatcouldpossiblygowrong'? Is that the replacement for 'thinkofthechildren'?

    --
    Does the name Pavlov ring a bell?
    1. Re:tired meme is tired by Two9A · · Score: 1

      Agreed, tag this article !whatcouldpossiblygowrong. Do the same for every subsequent article which manages to gain this tag. Maybe then it'll only be used where it's appropriate.

      --
      xkcdsw: the unofficial archive of Making xkcd Slightly Worse
  78. AAAAAGH! by jetpack · · Score: 1

    My eyes! The goggles! They do nothing!

  79. Doom III by Nim82 · · Score: 1

    If only Doom 3's flashlight had been that effective!

  80. That's a negative on the weenie roast by JudgeFurious · · Score: 1

    The smores jokes are funny but you don't want that thing anywhere near your package.

    --
    Appended to the end of comments you post. 120 chars.
  81. Booby traps by EmbeddedJanitor · · Score: 1
    Making the dangerous seem harmless. That is the real problem about a product like this. It is hard to tell the difference between a harmless flashlight and a dangerous one.

    The unfortunate thing about warning labels is that they are so prevalent for obvious cases that they no longer have impact for when they are really needed (Warning: If you heat this product to boiling point and pour it on yourself you may experience discomfort or burns). Like Windows "click through" warnings people just ignore them.

    Because of their overuse, warning labels no longer have meaning and are mostly useless.

    --
    Engineering is the art of compromise.
  82. My LightSaber v1.0 beta by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Some body copied my My Light Saber v1.0 beta. Where is my lawyer Jar Jar Binks - Darth Vader

  83. No kidding. by pavon · · Score: 1

    Besides considering that the primary selling point of this gadget is the pure awesomeness of burning things with light, you'd think they could come up with something that looked a bit more menacing, like so. You know something less likely to be mistaken for a harmless toy.

    Oh wait.

  84. Re:4100 Lumen is certainly no world record holder. by blhack · · Score: 1

    Yeah, that's it. I wanted to avoid slashdotting the servers there, so I didn't provide a link. Well the server is down already....
    Google cache to the rescue!
    --
    NewslilySocial News. No lolcats allowed.
  85. not all warning labels are bad by joggle · · Score: 2, Informative

    Not all things are obviously dangerous (like this powerful flashlight). While most warnings are ridiculous, I think one on a seemingly harmless object that is in fact dangerous makes sense. Another example where you would see warnings is on cleaning products because when you combine ammonia ones with bleach chlorine gas will be released. That's not the most obvious thing in the world and that warning has probably saved many lives.

  86. video needs a warning label by freg · · Score: 1

    I dunno about you guys but I think I damaged my eyes just watching the video in the article.

  87. Re:4100 Lumen is certainly no world record holder. by Stereodude · · Score: 1

    See! :-P

  88. Nothing to see here... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No really... I CAN'T SEE!!!

  89. Not most powerful... by Babu+'God'+Hoover · · Score: 1

    Costs a bit more but better quality and they will demo the light, not just the heat.
    http://www.policeone.com/police-products/duty-gear/flashlights/press-releases/1357781/

  90. Re:4100 Lumen is certainly no world record holder. by meringuoid · · Score: 0, Troll
    Here's a beam shot of the Maxablaster shining on some clouds 4 miles up. http://img231.imageshack.us/my.php?image=spotoncloud2dp4ta1.jpg

    I think I speak for all the astronomy geeks here when I say I'd like to take that thing and introduce it rather directly to its user, by way of where the sun does not shine. And then switch it on.

    --
    Real Daleks don't climb stairs - they level the building.
  91. Finally! by chrismik · · Score: 0

    Finally! A Slashdot story where the ever-present whatcouldpossiblygowrong tag actually makes sense.

  92. Cool, but impractical. by SCHecklerX · · Score: 1

    15 minute burn time? I'd rather (and do) have these:

    http://www.jetlites.com/products.html

    I have the older NiMH model. Looking forward to getting the Lithium Ion version. 680 lumens and a 5 hour burn time. Lights up the trail nicely!

  93. Re:4100 Lumen is certainly no world record holder. by Stereodude · · Score: 1

    I'm sure he leaves it on all the time too just trying to ruin your view of the stars on a cloudy night.

  94. Good news, everyone! by Bluesman · · Score: 4, Funny

    I'd use mine to search for the winning Slurm can.

    --
    If moderation could change anything, it would be illegal.
    1. Re:Good news, everyone! by Vaticus · · Score: 1

      I can imagine the looks on the nurses faces in the emergency room now... Oww My Sperm!

      --
      John 3:16. Know it.
      Drink Yourself Healthy: MonaVie
  95. Blade new weapon? by Stereodude · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Look at the bright side. (pun intended) When Wesley Snipes carries one of these around in the next Blade movie to burn vampires at least we'll know it's plausible.

    1. Re:Blade new weapon? by EdIII · · Score: 1

      Dammit. I was going to post that. First thing I thought of too :)

  96. F-Ray by SilentBob0727 · · Score: 2, Funny

    [Bender examines Fry's insides with the F-Ray]

    Fry: Ow! My sperm!

    [Bender examines Fry's insides again]

    Fry: Huh. Didn't feel anything that time.

    --
    Life would be easier if I had the source code.
  97. No way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You're just falling victim to the Megalumens Myth.

  98. About those chainsaws... by SanityInAnarchy · · Score: 1

    There exist chainsaws which have the following warning label:

    Do not attempt to stop chain with your hands or genitals.

    So yes, I absolutely do think chainsaws should have fewer warning labels, as anyone who actually seriously considers stopping a chainsaw blade with their genitals should never, ever be allowed to reproduce. Let them be selected out!

    --
    Don't thank God, thank a doctor!
  99. Larry Niven by SnarfQuest · · Score: 1

    Think of it as evolution in action.

    --
    Who would win this election: Andrew Weiner vs Andrew Weiner's weiner.
  100. Nice by xouumalperxe · · Score: 0

    I wonder if one of these puppies would be overkill for replacing my mobile phone when I'm looking for my keys in the dark...

  101. Sounds like a neat item... by CyberKender · · Score: 1

    But I think I'm going to hold off purchasing one until someone comes up with Niven's Flashlight-laser.

    --
    CyberKender
    Apparently Appointed Lord Mayor of There
  102. Available also from Mainway Toys! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It will complement the company's already-popular children's toys: Pretty Peggy Ear-Piercing Set, Mr. Skin-Grafter, General Tron's Secret Police Confession Kit, Doggie Dentist, and the best-selling Bag o' Glass.

  103. TSA by belg4mit · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Now banned from all flights: any light-emitting device whatsoever.

    --
    Were that I say, pancakes?
  104. And designed to fit almost any carry-on bag...! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yow!

  105. Um, no by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Surefire 6P Original puts out 60 lumens with the original bulb, 120 with the optional high-output bulb. Their more powerful handheld flashlights are 105/200, and the LED models put out 80 for the smaller ones, or 100 for the bigger ones.

    4100 lumens in a handheld light will probably blind you if you try to use it the way you suggest. Blinding the other guy doesn't help you that much if you the light reflected from the surfaces you point it at blind you too.

  106. fishy by briancnorton · · Score: 1

    I've got 4x 6500 Lumen projectors that I use at work, and I DEFINITELY can't light anything on fire with them. (I tried)

    --

    People who think they know everything really piss off those of us that actually do.

    1. Re:fishy by Stereodude · · Score: 1
      >I've got 4x 6500 Lumen projectors that I use at work, and I DEFINITELY can't light anything on fire with them. (I tried)

      Your projector most likely uses an UHP bulb (or several). This flashlight uses a incandescent bulb. Incandescent bulbs have a lot of IR output which allows them to catch things on fire (as you see in the video). UHP, HID, and other bulb technologies don't, so despite having equal or greater lumens you can't light stuff on fire.

  107. Yeah, but ... by PPH · · Score: 1

    ... can you mount it on a shark?

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
  108. yeah, but... by Humorless+Coward. · · Score: 0

    why?

    "These go to eleven!"

  109. Would something really bad happen... by Saberwind · · Score: 1

    ...if you crossed the beams?

  110. Website torched by lpq · · Score: 1

    Tried the maker's website...."can't connect to DB 1Can't connect to local MySQL server through socket '/var/lib/mysql/mysql.sock' (11)"

    Seems like something got cooked...

  111. Re:4100 Lumen is certainly no world record holder. by PNutts · · Score: 0

    I clicked the link and got a pop-under ad for LASIK eye surgery. Coincidence?

  112. A good thing to have by jtgd · · Score: 0

    for when you're stranded on a life raft and need to flash an SOS up to the space shuttle or weather satellite.

    --
    J
  113. Sorry by el_munkie · · Score: 1

    I meant to mod you "Funny" and misclicked "overrated". This post is to negate that.

  114. the Ghostbusters would be proud by ChipMonk · · Score: 1

    And you thought "crossing the beams" was just in the movies.

  115. We've come so far by Melbourne+Pete · · Score: 3, Funny

    Finally, we have a torch that can both provide light and a source of fire. Wait a minute...

  116. Is that a "Phaser on overload ..." by Rockin'Robert · · Score: 0

    or a carbide lamp
    about to explode?
    DO NOT BEAM ME!
    RR

  117. No one cam up with this? by bickerdyke · · Score: 1

    Dr. Egon Spengler: There's something very important I forgot to tell you.
    Dr. Peter Venkman: What?
    Dr. Egon Spengler: Don't cross the streams.
    Dr. Peter Venkman: Why?
    Dr. Egon Spengler: It would be bad.
    Dr. Peter Venkman: I'm fuzzy on the whole good/bad thing. What do you mean, "bad"?
    Dr. Egon Spengler: Try to imagine all life as you know it stopping instantaneously and every molecule in your body exploding at the speed of light.
    Dr Ray Stantz: Total protonic reversal.
    Dr. Peter Venkman: Right. That's bad. Okay. All right. Important safety tip. Thanks, Egon.

    --
    bickerdyke
  118. Yeah..... by IHC+Navistar · · Score: 1

    It's only a matter of time before some unsuspecting fool grabs it in an attempt to locate the source of a fuel leak underneath his car.....

    --
    Knowing Google's lust for data collection, the Soviet Union is still alive and well inside the psyche of Sergey Brin....
    1. Re:Yeah..... by kneemoe · · Score: 1

      when you drive a Scout these thing come to mind rather quickly, eh?

      --
      My Sig Sucks
    2. Re:Yeah..... by IHC+Navistar · · Score: 1

      I haven't had a Scout...yet... but my cousin drove one. I have a Ford F250 with an International Harvester / Navistar 185A 7.3L V8 diesel. I had a *massive* fuel leak problem when the state mandated Low Sulfur diesel. I hadn't had a fuel system retrofit kit installed yet, so the new diesel type destroyed virtually all of the seals and some of the hoses in the fuel system. It was dripping on to the ground in a steady stream and pooling on top of the intake manifold.

      THANKFULLY, I used a MagLite to find the sources of the leaking fuel, and not this "Pocket Arson" that these people came up with.

      --
      Knowing Google's lust for data collection, the Soviet Union is still alive and well inside the psyche of Sergey Brin....
  119. And this is news.. why? by RichiH · · Score: 1

    HID has been around for ages, as have other lighting technologies. The more Watts your light source drains, the more power is output in heat and light. Apart from those obvious points, one thing remains: form factor. If you truly want a light that you can use for 15 minutes and no more, this is innovative. If you want this kind of portable light source with reasonable usage times, look into the emergency search & rescue area or the scuba community. Disclaimer: scuba lights are usually designed with the heat transfer rates of water, not air, in mind. Finally, if you want to build those things yourself: http://www.tauchfunzel.de/OSTAR1_en.htm

  120. The rise and fall of humankind by uuxququex · · Score: 1
    Why? How?

    Once we, as humankind, were able to put a few of our fellow man on the moon. On the *fucking* moon! Think about it, they left the ball of dirt we all take for granted, flew off into space, landed on another heavenly body. And returned, safely!

    In order to do that you need balls and you have to take risks. Not just the insanely brave astronauts, but also as a people. Just to defy common sense and say: "yes, it might be risky, it might be impossible, but goddamn we're going to put a man on the moon!".

    How on gods green earth have we now become a litigious race of pussified wankers that can't take personal responsibility or grasp the concept that hot things maybe hot, and sticking live extention cords in you ass might be a bit of a shocker?

    Unbe-fucking-lievable!

  121. Can it blind drivers? by chord.wav · · Score: 1

    Can it blind a limo driver with a princess on the backseat?

  122. That's obligatory? This is obligatory: by Crayon+Kid · · Score: 2, Funny

    "It burnsss uss!"

    --
    i ate crayons when i was a kid and now i have two braincells and the blue ones taste nicer
  123. Re:WOW!! by neo-mkrey · · Score: 1

    Well, I'll keep trying until I post THE most useless post ever.

    I was only trying to be funny, because I would have no practical use for this flashlight, nor do I think would most people.
    Next time when I have nothing to say, I'll just keep quiet as not to offend your overly sensitive nature.

  124. Re:WOW!! by neo-mkrey · · Score: 1

    And just to make sure this horse is *dead*, I was quoting a line from Seinfeld.

  125. oh good by indy_Muad'Dib · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Now I don't need to worry about getting eaten by a Grue.

  126. Novelty item by Derf_X · · Score: 1

    IMHO, it's just an expensive (and dangerous) novelty item to show off with no REAL purpose.

  127. Well, U could always build one by heroine · · Score: 1

    U could always build one out of the right bulb & an aluminum reflector, but most people would rather spend the $300.

  128. Re:4100 Lumen is certainly no world record holder. by damncrackmonkey · · Score: 1

    How does 3000 Lumens (Maxablaster) make 4100 Lumens look weak sauce again?

  129. Re:4100 Lumen is certainly no world record holder. by Stereodude · · Score: 2, Informative
    >How does 3000 Lumens (Maxablaster) make 4100 Lumens look weak sauce again?

    First of all the Wicked Laser flashlight in question doesn't put out 4100 Lumens. Real world testing shows that the formulas used to estimate the lumens of the bulb in that flashlight are about 2x as high as they really are at the power level the light is using.

    Second, the light coming from the Wicked Lasers flashlight isn't very well collimated. It's one thing to make a lights that seems bright from 3' away. It's another to make one that seems bright from miles away. Being able to put a visible spot on a cloud 4 miles away or light up buildings from 6.2km away is a lot more impressive than lighting stuff on fire from a few inches away regardless of the lumen output.

    Finally, There are far more powerful lights (in terms of lumens) made by other members on the CandlePower Forums. There is one light with 14000 bulb lumen. So, it's certainly not the worlds brightest flashlight.