This whole thing is wildly inaccurate. Rounding errors, ballot stuffers, dynamic IPs, firewalls. If you're using these numbers to do anything important, you're insane.
This new digital wireless cable technology poses a grave threat to intellectual property rights. According to the article, this new infrstructure will be built within two years. By then, most Americans will have broadband internet access. Digital convergence of television makes it all the easier for people to pirate from the media. This will subesequently hurt the consumer in the long run. So, if we're going to spend the time and effort to set up a new nationwide communication infrastructure, we must also implement a digital rights managment scheme to accompany it.
Lyle Lanley: Well, sir, there's nothing on earth Like a genuine, Bona fide, Electrified, Six-car Monorail! What'd I say? Ned Flanders: Monorail! Lyle Lanley: What's it called? Patty+Selma: Monorail! Lyle Lanley: That's right! Monorail! [crowd chants `Monorail' softly and rhythmically] Miss Hoover: I hear those things are awfully loud... Lyle Lanley: It glides as softly as a cloud. Apu: Is there a chance the track could bend? Lyle Lanley: Not on your life, my Hindu friend. Barney: What about us brain-dead slobs? Lyle Lanley: You'll be given cushy jobs. Abe: Were you sent here by the devil? Lyle Lanley: No, good sir, I'm on the level. Wiggum: The ring came off my pudding can. Lyle Lanley: Take my pen knife, my good man. I swear it's Springfield's only choice...Throw up your hands and raise your voice! All: Monorail! Lyle Lanley: What's it called? All: Monorail! Lyle Lanley: Once again... All: Monorail! Marge: But Main Street's still all cracked and broken... Bart: Sorry, Mom, the mob has spoken! All: Monorail! Monorail! Monorail! [big finish] Monorail! Homer: Mono... D'oh!
Defeating the lameness filter sure is boring. Your comment violated the "postercomment" compression filter. Try less whitespace and/or less repetition. Comment aborted. Problems regarding accounts or comment posting should be sent to CowboyNeal. Please try to keep posts on topic. Try to reply to other people comments instead of starting new threads. Read other people's messages before posting your own to avoid simply duplicating what has already been said. Use a clear subject that describes what your message is about. Offtopic, Inflammatory, Inappropriate, Illegal, or Offensive comments might be moderated. (You can read everything, even moderated posts, by adjusting your threshold on the User Preferences Page)
as long as the GNOME developers get plenty of fluids and avoid strenuous exercise, they will overcome Mono. Recovery may take anywhere from two weeks to 3 months, though.
Pretending there's no need for any security strategy is just foolish.
I'm all for security strategies. I am against strategies that don't work.
Yes, materials containment is the better long-term route but you have to have a plan to prevent plans for imminent mass destruction that's based on pragmatics in addition to long term balances.
You're unnecessarily abstracting the topic. This isn't a philosophical debate. This doesn't *need* to be about censorship issues that slashdot has forced through your thick skull. Its about whether or not this restriction will *do* anything!
If you really disagree with me, go ahead and post your root password here
Well, my root password hasn't been available to the public for 50 years, now has it? If it were available to the public for that long, would taking the password offline make security any better? No, because everyone would know it already!
Perhaps I've been a fool to feed the trolls. Your inability to respond to any of the arguments I previously put forth suggests the presence of early-stage delusional psychosis. If you seek psychotherapy counseling, you can respond, but please don't further your idiotic argument, it will be ignored.
Technology merits aside, why did they have to choose the name 'peek a booty' ?? This really isn't helping us getting rid of the 'pron-fiend-p2p-user' stereotype. I can't imagine the company or technology being recognized by corporate types, either.
Permissive access to some kinds of information leads to temptation to and propensity for its use.
What are you talking about? This information has been available to the general public for over 50 years. It'd be like trying to close the source to Apache or FreeBSD - something impossible and unfeasible.
ramblings of a feeble-minded malcontent who believes that freedom must necessarily discard all protections.
I never mentioned anything about liberty or freedom. I'm just saying that this restriction won't work.
We're living in the 21st fucking century. One can assume that terrorists (a) know how to build weapons capable of inflicting mass death and (b) will use these weapons against us if they get a hold of them. We should be restricting materials needed to build these weapons rather than the knowledge to do so.
According to the article, "The federal reports already withdrawn, once sold freely to the public, include not only declassified ones from the 1940's, 50's and 60's but also modern ones that were previously judged to contain nothing that had to be kept secret." The attempt to restrict both old declassified research and modern unclassified research will prove unsuccessful:
Old Research: Passing legislation in an attempt to restrict the flow of 60 year old information is pretty hopeless. If the information has already been exposed to the public for over half a century, one can assume that terrorists already have a hold of it.
New Research: We shouldn't be worried about terrorists utilizing modern research to develop a super-mega-death bomb. Cold-War era weapons are deadly enough for a terrorist. After all, about 2000 people died on Sept. 11, while 70,000 were decimated over half a century ago by the nuclear bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki.
Slashdot Mirror
jog meat
oh yes
of course
Can you say "bad idea"?
We know, you just want to set up a surveillance cam to spy on chicks (?). You could have been up front with it though.
A few months ago, I got a bug up my sphincter
I hate it when that happens.
Interested in crazy shit that people believe in? Just visit About: Abnormal and Irregular Beliefs.
This whole thing is wildly inaccurate. Rounding errors, ballot stuffers, dynamic IPs, firewalls. If you're using these numbers to do anything important, you're insane.
God, don't scientists ever learn?
try http://www.freemed.org
It utilizes apache, php, and has a light html frontend. That about fits the bill.
This new digital wireless cable technology poses a grave threat to intellectual property rights. According to the article, this new infrstructure will be built within two years. By then, most Americans will have broadband internet access. Digital convergence of television makes it all the easier for people to pirate from the media. This will subesequently hurt the consumer in the long run. So, if we're going to spend the time and effort to set up a new nationwide communication infrastructure, we must also implement a digital rights managment scheme to accompany it.
Lyle Lanley: Well, sir, there's nothing on earth Like a genuine, Bona fide, Electrified, Six-car Monorail! What'd I say?
Ned Flanders: Monorail!
Lyle Lanley: What's it called?
Patty+Selma: Monorail!
Lyle Lanley: That's right! Monorail! [crowd chants `Monorail' softly and rhythmically]
Miss Hoover: I hear those things are awfully loud...
Lyle Lanley: It glides as softly as a cloud.
Apu: Is there a chance the track could bend?
Lyle Lanley: Not on your life, my Hindu friend.
Barney: What about us brain-dead slobs?
Lyle Lanley: You'll be given cushy jobs.
Abe: Were you sent here by the devil?
Lyle Lanley: No, good sir, I'm on the level.
Wiggum: The ring came off my pudding can.
Lyle Lanley: Take my pen knife, my good man. I swear it's Springfield's only choice...Throw up your hands and raise your voice!
All: Monorail!
Lyle Lanley: What's it called?
All: Monorail!
Lyle Lanley: Once again...
All: Monorail!
Marge: But Main Street's still all cracked and broken...
Bart: Sorry, Mom, the mob has spoken!
All: Monorail! Monorail! Monorail! [big finish] Monorail!
Homer: Mono... D'oh!
Defeating the lameness filter sure is boring. Your comment violated the "postercomment" compression filter. Try less whitespace and/or less repetition. Comment aborted. Problems regarding accounts or comment posting should be sent to CowboyNeal. Please try to keep posts on topic. Try to reply to other people comments instead of starting new threads. Read other people's messages before posting your own to avoid simply duplicating what has already been said. Use a clear subject that describes what your message is about. Offtopic, Inflammatory, Inappropriate, Illegal, or Offensive comments might be moderated. (You can read everything, even moderated posts, by adjusting your threshold on the User Preferences Page)
Looks like the pagan masses of slashdot have taken down yet another site. And I think he spelled "anti-Microsoft" wrong.
Oh, by the way, cache is here.
as long as the GNOME developers get plenty of fluids and avoid strenuous exercise, they will overcome Mono. Recovery may take anywhere from two weeks to 3 months, though.
Fold up sneaker-skate JetSneakers are the way to go! Why just sneak...when you can also streak?
(calm yourselves, moderators, i'm joking, of course)
Pretending there's no need for any security strategy is just foolish.
I'm all for security strategies. I am against strategies that don't work.
Yes, materials containment is the better long-term route but you have to have a plan to prevent plans for imminent mass destruction that's based on pragmatics in addition to long term balances.
You're unnecessarily abstracting the topic. This isn't a philosophical debate. This doesn't *need* to be about censorship issues that slashdot has forced through your thick skull. Its about whether or not this restriction will *do* anything!
If you really disagree with me, go ahead and post your root password here
Well, my root password hasn't been available to the public for 50 years, now has it? If it were available to the public for that long, would taking the password offline make security any better? No, because everyone would know it already!
Perhaps I've been a fool to feed the trolls. Your inability to respond to any of the arguments I previously put forth suggests the presence of early-stage delusional psychosis. If you seek psychotherapy counseling, you can respond, but please don't further your idiotic argument, it will be ignored.
I concur. Niggers are apes. /. is hella racist)
(man, two in one day.
I concur. Niggers are apes.
Technology merits aside, why did they have to choose the name 'peek a booty' ?? This really isn't helping us getting rid of the 'pron-fiend-p2p-user' stereotype. I can't imagine the company or technology being recognized by corporate types, either.
Permissive access to some kinds of information leads to temptation to and propensity for its use.
What are you talking about? This information has been available to the general public for over 50 years. It'd be like trying to close the source to Apache or FreeBSD - something impossible and unfeasible.
ramblings of a feeble-minded malcontent who believes that freedom must necessarily discard all protections.
I never mentioned anything about liberty or freedom. I'm just saying that this restriction won't work.
We're living in the 21st fucking century. One can assume that terrorists (a) know how to build weapons capable of inflicting mass death and (b) will use these weapons against us if they get a hold of them. We should be restricting materials needed to build these weapons rather than the knowledge to do so.
According to the article, "The federal reports already withdrawn, once sold freely to the public, include not only declassified ones from the 1940's, 50's and 60's but also modern ones that were previously judged to contain nothing that had to be kept secret." The attempt to restrict both old declassified research and modern unclassified research will prove unsuccessful:
Old Research: Passing legislation in an attempt to restrict the flow of 60 year old information is pretty hopeless. If the information has already been exposed to the public for over half a century, one can assume that terrorists already have a hold of it.
New Research: We shouldn't be worried about terrorists utilizing modern research to develop a super-mega-death bomb. Cold-War era weapons are deadly enough for a terrorist. After all, about 2000 people died on Sept. 11, while 70,000 were decimated over half a century ago by the nuclear bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki.
You stupid fuck. I can do all of the shit that you mentioned on my x86/windows box just fine without any 'bazaar [sic] configuration issues.'