It could have been that the un-collapsed section is in fact filled full of derbies.
If it's filled with derbies, I think we better get up there fast and close the hat gap we're going to be experiencing soon with the rest of the world. Not trying to be a grammar Nazi, and thanks for the link!
If I read that US Code right, then the artist who works for a record company doesn't even have the right to perform it, as the artist doesn't hold the copyright on the music itself (Title 17, Chapter 1, Section 106). I may just be smoking rope here, but that's the way it looks.
It could have been that the un-collapsed section is in fact filled full of derbies.
If it's filled with derbies, I think we better get up there fast and close the hat gap we're going to be experiencing soon with the rest of the world. Not trying to be a grammar Nazi, and thanks for the link!
As long as it's a dunk tank filled with liquid nitrogen, I'd pay.
fp
If I read that US Code right, then the artist who works for a record company doesn't even have the right to perform it, as the artist doesn't hold the copyright on the music itself (Title 17, Chapter 1, Section 106). I may just be smoking rope here, but that's the way it looks.