Slashdot Mirror


SCO Assets Going To October Auction

An anonymous reader noted that the SCO Group is having a bankruptcy auction in October. The article says 'After bankruptcy in September 2007, SCO and an affiliate filed schedules listing combined assets of $14.2 million and debt totaling $5.2 million.' I wonder if we could all chip in and buy something as a sort of 'Thanks for being a pimple on the face of humanity' present.

217 comments

  1. First bid! by grub · · Score: 4, Funny


    $50 for Darl McBride's greased Yoda doll!

    --
    Trolling is a art,
    1. Re:First bid! by WrongSizeGlass · · Score: 5, Funny

      I didn't see the rights to Unix listed in their assets for sale. Must be an oversight or something ...

    2. Re:First bid! by jusdisgi · · Score: 3, Funny

      Might be time to finally change my sig...

      --
      Given a choice between free speech and free beer, most people will take the beer.
    3. Re:First bid! by drolli · · Score: 1

      I want the suitcase which contained the proofs that the code is theirs.

    4. Re:First bid! by Locke2005 · · Score: 3, Funny

      They would show it to you, but they lost it in a pile of pixie dust and unicorn manure...

      --
      I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
    5. Re:First bid! by roc97007 · · Score: 1

      That's 'cause I already bought them for $5. Yeah, all those companies owe me big time...

      --
      Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
    6. Re:First bid! by Darinbob · · Score: 5, Funny

      "I went to SCO's out of business auction, and all I got was this tee-shirt they didn't own"

    7. Re:First bid! by Sulphur · · Score: 1

      Maybe the rights to Unix were sold to the lawyers in lieu of payment in cash.

    8. Re:First bid! by jgagnon · · Score: 5, Informative

      Unicorn manure is GREAT for growing sweet & sour corn.

      --
      Remember to maintain your supply of /facepalm oil to prevent chafing.
    9. Re:First bid! by lgw · · Score: 1

      Last chance to buy a license for Linux!

      A company I used to work for actually had one of those - I wish I had saved it as a relic of the crazy.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    10. Re:First bid! by nanospook · · Score: 1

      Stay tuned for episode two! "The Bride of Dan McBride"

      --
      Have you fscked your local propeller head today?
    11. Re:First bid! by Phat_Tony · · Score: 2, Funny

      Actually, I'm curious what kind of price used FUD goes for.

      --
      Can anyone tell me how to set my sig on Slashdot?
    12. Re:First bid! by Kr3m3Puff · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Unicorn manure is GREAT for growing sweet & sour corn.

      Only on /. does this get flagged as "Informative".

      --
      D.O.U.O.S.V.A.V.V.M.
    13. Re:First bid! by Jeremi · · Score: 1

      I didn't see the rights to Unix listed in their assets for sale. Must be an oversight or something ...

      That's because they sold the rights to me in advance. Y'all will be hearing from my attorneys shortly.

      --


      I don't care if it's 90,000 hectares. That lake was not my doing.
    14. Re:First bid! by daem0n1x · · Score: 1

      Only in Soviet Russia, lawyers are duped by YOU!

    15. Re:First bid! by mcgrew · · Score: 2, Informative

      Right now it's 40% informative, 20% offtopic and 20% redundant. Somebody with mod points needs more coffee this morning.

    16. Re:First bid! by IICV · · Score: 1

      How do you see the moderation percentages? I used to be able to see them, but for some reason it stopped showing a while ago.

    17. Re:First bid! by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      Click where it says "score" after the subject; it behaves differently with different browsers, though. At work (IE6) it puts the score at the top of the page and looks like it doesn't do anything, unless you have only that comment open. At home (Firefox) it puts an overlay on the screen with the scores. I wouldn't doubt if it were different on Safari, Konqueror, Chrome, Opera, etc as well.

    18. Re:First bid! by IICV · · Score: 1

      Wow, that's kind of a stupid place to put it - it looks like the link doesn't actually do anything. Thanks!

    19. Re:First bid! by Jason+Levine · · Score: 1

      Wait, they sold you the rights to Unix? They sold me the rights! I probably should have been suspicious when they handed me a photocopied piece of paper that read "The Rights To Unix."

      --
      My sci-fi novel, Ghost Thief, is now available from Amazon.com.
  2. who would of knew by Dyinobal · · Score: 2, Funny

    Who would of knew suing people is not a viable business model, I mean it works for all those other patent trolls.

    1. Re:who would of knew by XanC · · Score: 4, Funny

      You've created a unique combination of errors in your sentence. I am baffled as to what's going on in your head.

    2. Re:who would of knew by oldhack · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Who would of knew suing people is not a viable business model...

      Works for lawyers.

      --
      Fuck systemd. Fuck Redhat. Fuck Soylent, too. Wait, scratch the last one.
    3. Re:who would of knew by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You've created a unique combination of errors in your sentence. I am baffled as to what's going on in your head.

      Who would of knew suing people is not a viable business model, I mean it works for all those other patent trolls.

      Who would of knew suing? People is not a viable business model. I mean it; works for all those other patent trolls.

    4. Re:who would of knew by jgagnon · · Score: 3, Funny

      It's the SCO defense... where have you been?

      --
      Remember to maintain your supply of /facepalm oil to prevent chafing.
    5. Re:who would of knew by Sloppy · · Score: 1

      It was a good business for the execs who had the stock for a while and then dumped it at the end of the pump phase. It just wasn't good business for the less-inside stockholders, who didn't know they had been lied to about the merits of the case.

      --
      As copyright owner of this comment, I authorize everyone to defeat any technological measure which limits access to it.
    6. Re:who would of knew by djlowe · · Score: 1

      Who would of knew

      Really? Your command of written English is so poor that you actually thought that this was correct and then posted it here?

      Taking a quote from your posting history (for which you got modded up as +4 Insightful, for reasons I simply cannot understand, just because it is a gross over-simplification): http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1733202&cid=33040180>: "There is education and then there is training figure out which one you want and get it. Most everything these days is geared towards training."

      I think what saddens me the most about this statement is the implication that "training" - i.e. education to learn a specific skill or set of skills, and ignoring anything else during such, by design, is somehow better in general than "education", which I always thought meant "learning, in general, and also (hopefully) learning HOW to learn in the future", and so was a superset of training, and in fact, created the framework that permitted one to be trained in specific skills in the future as needed/desired, or learn other things as well.

      Who would of knew [sic] that I could be so wrong?

      Regards,

      dj

    7. Re:who would of knew by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      -> who would of knew
      should have been "who would have known". The way we speak it sounds like 'of' but it's really 'have', and past particle nor present/infinative for the verb.

      And to the arrogant tit who was "baffled as to what's going on in your head", the grammer's not that difficult!

    8. Re:who would of knew by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Jesus christ relax is just internet chat. its not like someons gonna die oover it or somethig.

    9. Re:who would of knew by nacturation · · Score: 1

      You've created a unique combination of errors in your sentence. I am baffled as to what's going on in your head.

      I of had to read worse English.

      --
      Want to improve your Karma? Instead of "Post Anonymously", try the "Post Humously" option.
    10. Re:who would of knew by soundguy · · Score: 1

      For your information, my entire family was slaughtered by roving gangs of dangling participles and split infinitives!

      --
      Nothing worthwhile ever happens before noon
    11. Re:who would of knew by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You have my sympathy. There's never a grammar policeman around when you need one!

    12. Re:who would of knew by ascari · · Score: 1

      which of fuck?

    13. Re:who would of knew by lennier1 · · Score: 1

      Patent trolls, MAFIAA, ...
      Lawyers have developed a whole industry around this idea.

    14. Re:who would of knew by HasselhoffThePaladin · · Score: 1

      And to the arrogant tit who was "baffled as to what's going on in your head", the grammer's not that difficult!

      Niether is the spelling.

    15. Re:who would of knew by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The way we speak it sounds like 'of' Who is "we"? The inhabitants of Retardville Dumbfucky?

    16. Re:who would of knew by Compaqt · · Score: 1

      Who'd of known the grammer nazis were so right.

      For all intensive purposes, their as dangerous as mispelled plural's.

      --
      I'm not a lawyer, but I play one on the Internet. Blog
    17. Re:who would of knew by Foobar+of+Borg · · Score: 1

      Taking a quote from your posting history

      Anyone who obsesses over another person's posting history seriously needs to shoot himself in the head.

    18. Re:who would of knew by pinkushun · · Score: 1

      *ahem*

      For all intents and purposes

      fixiert, dass für Sie ;)

    19. Re:who would of knew by Muad'Dave · · Score: 1

      'We' are those of us who say it as the contraction "would've" as opposed to the sometimes stilted-sounding "would have". The contraction does sound like "wood-of", so I can see where an unthinking writer would spell it "would of".

      --
      Tiller's Rule: Never use a word in written form that you've only heard and never read. You will end up looking foolish.
    20. Re:who would of knew by sabt-pestnu · · Score: 1

      Und Sie taten nicht korrekt dieses?

      they're as dangerous as misspelled plurals

      Woosh!

    21. Re:who would of knew by myyrk · · Score: 1

      And to the arrogant tit who was "baffled as to what's going on in your head", the grammer's not that difficult!

      Niether is the spelling.

      Neither is the spelling.

    22. Re:who would of knew by XanC · · Score: 1

      Right. But this is a particularly egregious mistake. It's not a typo or getting a definition slightly wrong. Swapping a verb for a preposition simply means that the writer has no clue how the English language works, and I really don't know how such a person can live day-to-day.

    23. Re:who would of knew by Muad'Dave · · Score: 1

      The commenter that I replied to hinted at not realizing that there are plenty of educated people outside of his little world that pronounce the contraction as 'would of'.

      I agree wholeheartedly that making that mistake hints at a basic misunderstanding of the mechanics of English. I didn't say I thought it was acceptable, only that I understand how it came about.

      --
      Tiller's Rule: Never use a word in written form that you've only heard and never read. You will end up looking foolish.
    24. Re:who would of knew by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Anyone who obsesses over another person's posting history seriously needs to shoot himself in the head.

      As opposed to shooting oneself in the head frivolously, I suppose?"

  3. Hmm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    But sco.com and redirect it to goat.cx (or whatever they call it)?

    1. Re:Hmm... by LoRdTAW · · Score: 1

      Sadly, goatse.cx is no longer with us :-(. Maybe we can all chip in to make sco.com the new goatse.

    2. Re:Hmm... by roc97007 · · Score: 1

      Wait until sco.com expires and you can probably pick it up for $20 or so.

      --
      Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
    3. Re:Hmm... by sumdumass · · Score: 1

      Just redirect it to http://amishrakefight.org/gfy/

      All will be fine.

    4. Re:Hmm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      why would anyone want it

    5. Re:Hmm... by oldspewey · · Score: 1

      Same reason people have been known to dance on the battered corpse of a vanquished foe.

      --
      If libertarians are so opposed to effective government, why don't they all move to Somalia?
    6. Re:Hmm... by TaoPhoenix · · Score: 1

      Actually, the French like their copy. It's been there for years.

      --
      My first Journal Entry ever, in 8 years! http://slashdot.org/journal/365947/aphelion-scifi-fantasy-horror-poetry-webzine
    7. Re:Hmm... by djlowe · · Score: 0, Troll

      Actually, the French like their copy. It's been there for years.

      Hey, thanks for keeping track of that and letting the rest of us know!

      I, personally, could not have slept tonight without knowing that you are monitoring the French copy of it, and the fact that you are not only doing so, but also ensuring their happiness with it, AND keeping all of us on Slashdot posted with regards to such, makes me VERY happy that I am not you, and I am fairly confident that many others here on Slashdot will agree with me.

      Regards,

      dj

    8. Re:Hmm... by roc97007 · · Score: 1

      Yeah. For instance, redirect it to a porn site.

      --
      Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
  4. Face? by Zipo+Bibrok+5e8 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I think you meant "ass".

    --
    -- The Brory Stool Co.: We accidentally the best stools from behind seven proxies, since 2009.
  5. Corporate Reality by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Darl McBride's new corporation, OCS, will buy all of the assets at auction for a fraction of the original cost, and continue exactly where he left off with the lawsuits, only this time with a brand new credit rating and no debt to bog him down.

    1. Re:Corporate Reality by Bryansix · · Score: 1

      In REALITY this happens all the time but nothing goes to auction and there is never an official bankruptcy. Just enough rumors of bankruptcy to get the vendors to give up.

    2. Re:Corporate Reality by amicusNYCL · · Score: 1

      Darl McBride's new corporation, OCS, will buy all of the assets at auction for a fraction of the original cost

      Hmm. I bet he sure wouldn't appreciate people bidding for the purpose of making him pay more.

      --
      "Our two-party system is like a bowl of shit looking at itself in a mirror." - Lewis Black
    3. Re:Corporate Reality by Frosty+Piss · · Score: 1

      I plan on buying UNIX from SCO...

      --
      If you want news from today, you have to come back tomorrow.
    4. Re:Corporate Reality by Camel+Pilot · · Score: 1

      Darl McBride's new corporation, OCS, will buy all of the assets at auction for a fraction of the original cost, and continue exactly where he left off with the lawsuits, only this time with a brand new credit rating and no debt to bog him down.

      True, from the wiki on McBride

      "On April 9, 2010 McBride purchased the SCO Mobility intellectual property from The SCO Group for $100,000"

      An asset that McBride had before referred to being worth millions.

  6. An Idea by Bryansix · · Score: 1

    Some sort of a phallus along with a note that says "Thanks for all your hard work guys. For that we are giving you this award! Turn this note over to find out where you can shove it!"

  7. There is a tradition. by randomencounter · · Score: 4, Informative

    Once upon a time there was a practice known as the "penny auction".

    --
    Forget diamonds, copyright is forever.
  8. Something nice for the kids by uvsc_wolverine · · Score: 1

    Well I work about 5 minutes from their old HQ (in fact I'm going to a meeting in that office park tomorrow)...anyone in the /. community want me to pick up something nice?

    --
    This space for rent...
    1. Re:Something nice for the kids by $RANDOMLUSER · · Score: 1

      Yeah. I'll take Daryl McBride's head on a spike. I'm willing to go as high as $100.

      --
      No folly is more costly than the folly of intolerant idealism. - Winston Churchill
    2. Re:Something nice for the kids by Tackhead · · Score: 5, Funny

      Well I work about 5 minutes from their old HQ (in fact I'm going to a meeting in that office park tomorrow)...anyone in the /. community want me to pick up something nice?

      Yeah. I'll take Darl McBride's head on a spike. I'm willing to go as high as $100.

      You're outbid. "I'd also like to be there when they cut off Darl McBride's head and stick it on a pike as a warning to the next ten generations of intellectual property lawyers that for some favors, even $600 is too high a price. I would look up into his lifeless eyes and wave, like this. *smileywave*. Can you the United States Trustees arrange that for me, Judge Stewart?"
      - What the CEO of Novell should have said when the case was finally closed.

    3. Re:Something nice for the kids by Maeslin · · Score: 1

      Whoever doesn't know the origin of that spectacularly appropriate (context-edited) quote must hand in their geek card immediately.

    4. Re:Something nice for the kids by Aggrajag · · Score: 1

      I'll take ten Linux licenses and please, try to bid less than $699 each. Thanks!

    5. Re:Something nice for the kids by sconeu · · Score: 1

      Except for a couple of things.

      1. Judge Stewart is not the US Trustee.
      2. Judge Gross is handling the BK.
      3. The US Trustee is Roberta De Angelis, who replaced Kelly Beaudin Stapleton.

      --
      General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
    6. Re:Something nice for the kids by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'll take ten Linux licenses and please, try to bid less than $699 each. Thanks!

      So, let me translate this: You're trying to make a funny reference to "$699" (the old SCO thing), by asking someone else to bid on licenses? What are you, stupid? Why would you do that? How is that funny?

      Seriously - do you have ANY idea how stupid and petty you appear?

    7. Re:Something nice for the kids by Walt+Dismal · · Score: 1

      Thank you, yes. I'd like to buy an SCO office urinal so I can do in reality what I always fantasized about doing to McBride's head.

    8. Re:Something nice for the kids by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      STFU, you cocksmoking teabagger!

  9. I'd be willing to buy the entire company... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...on the condition that Darl McBride puts a .45 in his mouth and blows his empty fucking skull into orbit.

  10. Bad Reporting? by UnknowingFool · · Score: 4, Informative

    The bankruptcy judge called for a Chapter 11 trustee in August 2009, about one month before the U.S. Court of Appeals in Denver ruled in the company’s favor after six years of litigation with Waltham, Massachusetts-based Novell Inc. The case went back to the district court, where the judge and jury further clarified SCO’s rights in certain Unix software incorporated in software for network systems.

    Reading that section, it would seem that SCO won their case against Novell. But that's not the case. SCO won certain points in the bankruptcy case like receiving Chapter 11 designation instead of Chapter 7 which Novell and U.S. Trustee's Office wanted. But it had to accept a trustee in place of management handling the bankruptcy. It definitely lost the Novell case.

    --
    Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it.
    1. Re:Bad Reporting? by mindwhip · · Score: 2, Insightful

      SCO Misrepresenting something? I don't believe you!

      --
      [The Universe] has gone offline.
    2. Re:Bad Reporting? by UnknowingFool · · Score: 3, Informative

      Also SCO won a partial judgment in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit in August 24, 2009. The Court of Appeals reversed and remanded the district court decision noting that the issues decided in summary judgment should have gone to trial instead. It did not rule whether SCO should have won, only that they could not be decided in summary judgment. It was all for naught as in trial later, the district court found in favor for Novell in that Novell owned the copyrights to Unix. But the appeals court upheld the district court's decision that SCO owed Novell for the 2003 Sun agreement.

      --
      Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it.
    3. Re:Bad Reporting? by cduffy · · Score: 1

      Reading that section, it would seem that SCO won their case against Novell.

      "Clarified [their] rights" means clarified what they did or did not have. That it happened to lean decisively to the latter doesn't make the language inaccurate -- as a non-lawyer who maybe has read somewhat more legalese than the average layperson (a few law classes back in school, and my wife is a paralegal), I didn't even think it misleading.

    4. Re:Bad Reporting? by Rogerborg · · Score: 1

      Perhaps not misleading, but almost utterly useless as a source of information.

      It would have been no less misleading and very nearly as accurate to have said "SCO said some stuff in some courts and some judges banged their hammers all official and some things done got decided." Not technically wrong, but not what you'd expect from an ostensibly professional journalist doing their day job. I guess there's no performance metrics in journalism.

      --
      If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
    5. Re:Bad Reporting? by cduffy · · Score: 1

      Perhaps not misleading, but almost utterly useless as a source of information.

      It's an entirely suitable explanation of why the trustee decided to wait rather than taking their current course of action earlier, which is the context in which it was provided. The audience here isn't necessarily people who know or care about the SCO/IBM or SCO/Novell trials; it's discussing bankruptcies themselves, not their causes.

  11. I'd pay $100 by DoofusOfDeath · · Score: 1

    For the shrunken head of Darl McBride.

    1. Re:I'd pay $100 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Extra bonus if it's still attached!

    2. Re:I'd pay $100 by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      If you shrink it anymore, it will no longer be visible.

    3. Re:I'd pay $100 by Locke2005 · · Score: 1
      --
      I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
    4. Re:I'd pay $100 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd pay $100 to take a dump on the living head of Darl Mcbride.

    5. Re:I'd pay $100 by pallmall1 · · Score: 1

      That's so SICK AND DISGUSTING...I might have to bit $150 :)

      --
      3 things about computers: they're alive, they're self-aware, and they hate your guts.
    6. Re:I'd pay $100 by pallmall1 · · Score: 1

      bid

      --
      3 things about computers: they're alive, they're self-aware, and they hate your guts.
    7. Re:I'd pay $100 by mr_mischief · · Score: 1

      Hey, stop that! You may have just created enough of a market to save SCO!

    8. Re:I'd pay $100 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Isn't that the idea?!

  12. Caveat Emptor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Beware any auction lots with printouts labeled "Unix Source Code"

  13. Got an idea by jtownatpunk.net · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Let's all chip in, buy the whole mess, release anything of value to the public domain, then burn the rest.

    I'll kick in $20 for that. Heck, I might be persuaded to donate a Bennie.

    1. Re:Got an idea by The+Archon+V2.0 · · Score: 1

      Let's all chip in, buy the whole mess, release anything of value to the public domain, then burn the rest.

      (Thinks back on SCO's recent output.) So, burn everything then?

    2. Re:Got an idea by nanospook · · Score: 1

      If we buy the company, won't we own Unix? Then we can release it to the public domain and save the world! Heroes!

      --
      Have you fscked your local propeller head today?
    3. Re:Got an idea by CAIMLAS · · Score: 1

      "release everything of value to the public domain, then burn the rest"

      You realize, don't you, that someone would still manage to utilize that "rest" to some nefarious IP lawsuit?

      --
      ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
  14. Oooh! Oooh! by Arancaytar · · Score: 1

    Are they going to auction off their rights to Linux? Because those might well turn out to be a goldmine if someone decided to sue some Linux vendors with them.

    (I'll be here all week!)

    1. Re:Oooh! Oooh! by ISurfTooMuch · · Score: 1

      Of course they will. It's about the only thing they have that the vultures might want.

  15. I'll take the UNIX copyrights and SYSV rights by mysidia · · Score: 5, Funny

    For $10

    So I can start a small litigious company to aggressively defend Linux and pursue proprietary "Windows" OS vendor(s) whose names start with "M".

    1. Re:I'll take the UNIX copyrights and SYSV rights by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      $10? Pah! You'll have to do better than that. They're worth at least $699.

  16. Answering the question... by Eggplant62 · · Score: 1

    As to "I wonder if...," no, we really shouldn't give those attention whores any further reward. The best thing to do from here is to ignore the bastards.

  17. SCOXQ already has a "stalking horse" buyer. by sconeu · · Score: 3, Interesting

    They essentially know who's going to bid.

    Any bets on who? My money is on Yarro.

    --
    General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
    1. Re:SCOXQ already has a "stalking horse" buyer. by Rogerborg · · Score: 1

      Nope, Yarro already (de facto) own the actual remaining assets: the Fear, Uncertainty and Doubt. He doesn't need or want the furniture.

      --
      If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
  18. The man who would be king. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Let this be a lesson for all those whose greed surpasses a normal man's measure... ... for all those who want power over others' knowledge... ... who want to leverage the State to oppress the weaker... ... who think they can sit on previous conquests and not work anymore... ... who think they can stop mankind evolution... ... who think they or their country is above the others... ... who think first of their friends instead of humanity as a whole... ... who try to take what they cannot ever return.

    This is a spaceship which we cannot control, but one we can destroy.

    Let this be the beginning of our awakening.

    1. Re:The man who would be king. by plasticsquirrel · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I'm not sure if you caught this, but SCO was defeated in court principally by IBM, one of the largest international corporations on the planet. They got pummeled, and the major reason it happened was because IBM had its powerful team of highly-paid lawyers. If a company like SCO pursued you or I for litigation, we would be raped financially by them. The court system only works for those who have the money to fund its high costs, similar to the patent system.

      --
      Systemd: the PulseAudio of init systems
    2. Re:The man who would be king. by mr_mischief · · Score: 1

      The enforcement portion of the patent system is the courts.

    3. Re:The man who would be king. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're an idiot.

    4. Re:The man who would be king. by CAIMLAS · · Score: 1

      Were you paying attention?

      THe people running SCO at the time made off like bandits. Meanwhile, the engineers and everyone else working for the company lost their shirts.

      What kind of lesson are you hoping greedy people learn, exactly?

      --
      ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
    5. Re:The man who would be king. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lesson 1: The pawns suffer more (the engineers).
      Lesson 2: The planning includes the escape in case of defeat.
      Lesson 3: Maybe the intent was not winning, but stalling Linux. If so, even if they lost, they were successful.
      Lesson 4: There's always a bigger fish.
      Lesson 5: Fame is easier than love.

      Lessons are not just for greedy people; if we all learn to deal with such parasites -- then we will have learned an important lesson.

  19. Zits by overshoot · · Score: 2, Interesting
    "Pimple on the face of humanity."

    That's a rather delicate way of putting it. I confess to having a lower opinion.

    --
    Lacking <sarcasm> tags, /. substitutes moderation as "Troll."
    1. Re:Zits by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 1

      I found it rather insulting .... to pimples.

      --
      Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
    2. Re:Zits by Camel+Pilot · · Score: 2, Funny

      "Pimple on the face of humanity."

      That's a rather delicate way of putting it. I confess to having a lower opinion.

      You mean like a pimple on a lower part of the anatomy?

    3. Re:Zits by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dingleberry on the asshole of society. Shit stain on the panties of life. Better?

    4. Re:Zits by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      SCO, because a case of runaway hemorrhoids wasn't descriptive enough.

    5. Re:Zits by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We changed the name of that part of the anatomy to Darl McBrides face.
      So 'face' is correct in a way.

    6. Re:Zits by MrFlibbs · · Score: 1

      How about a quote from Red Dwarf: "A cancerous polyp on the anus of humanity." Seems to fit better.

  20. I know what I'd buy... by Eberlin · · Score: 1

    and if everyone else just chipped in and bought those $699 Loonix licenses they were selling, SCO wouldn't be in this mess to begin with.

    Actually, I'll buy the rights to "/*" and "*/" and proceed to sue anyone that uses those symbols for IP violations. Maybe Microsoft will buy a license from me for a few mil so I can go after those freeloading Free Software programmers. Or maybe they can convince a canadian bank to invest in me so it doesn't look like they're the ones funding my litigation.

    Then I can get the folks from Yank & Grope to echo my FUD so I can ride the credibility of MMORPGara and Diiddo. Nah, I wouldn't want Pb&J after me.

    Oh yeah...

    ?

    Profit!

  21. I want the rights to their lawsuit. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'll analyze it to discover the secret of immortality.

  22. Sco Auction? by fishthegeek · · Score: 2, Funny

    Yes!!! Anyone have change for a dollar? It's biddin' time!

    --
    load "$",8,1
  23. Google? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sounds like a small price for Google to buy them up, make all the patents public for anyone who is not interested in imposing patents against Google, and thereby returning or continuing (however you see it) their plan to "don't be evil."

  24. What I want to know ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is it Dead yet?

    1. Re:What I want to know ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't know if it is dead yet, but now you can buy it and stamp on it.

  25. Why wait? by mknewman · · Score: 2, Funny

    Why wait? I'll sell you several boxes full of SCO licenses, manuals and disks! ODT 3.0 on! Great for your Labor Day bonfire!

    1. Re:Why wait? by Locke2005 · · Score: 1

      I've still got a Caldera Linux disk and license, still in box! Does that mean I don't have to pay the $699 for the Linux license?

      --
      I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
    2. Re:Why wait? by mknewman · · Score: 1

      Ha, I still have Minix 1.0 in a boxed set! MSDOS 1.0 and Turbo Pascal 1.0 as well (CPM).

  26. Buy any computers and hard drives for sale by ISurfTooMuch · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I'd buy any computers and hard drives I could find, then check to see if any data is left on them. If it appeared the drives were wiped, I'd go over them with data recovery software. You never know what interesting tidbits one might find on those things.

    At worst, you'd get some hardware. At best, you might find some extremely incriminating evidence. It likely wouldn't hold up in a court of law, but can you imagine the PR damage it could do to certain companies if it ended up online?

    And even if all you end up with is a bunch of random data, save it as an image file and post it online for people to download and try to decipher. It could provide countless hours of entertainment for years to come.

    Doing this might also provide a bit of insurance against any vultures buying the contested IP and carrying on with this shakedown scheme. No matter what might be on those drives, they could never know for sure how damaging the info might be, so it may give them pause, lest some bombshell appear at some point down the road. They'd essentially have a big black box floating around out there that contains either nothing at all or information that could prove disastrous to them, and that black box is constantly being picked at by folks trying to unlock it. Would you want to risk a bunch of money pursuing shaky legal claims with that uncertainty out there?

    1. Re:Buy any computers and hard drives for sale by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, cut the crap. We all know you are just looking for pr0n!

    2. Re:Buy any computers and hard drives for sale by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Psst... Yeah, but don't tell anyone. We wouldn't want them find out about it from a public forum or anything like that beforehand and make sure all the drives are destroyed. /sarcasm

    3. Re:Buy any computers and hard drives for sale by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      They'd essentially have a big black box floating around out there that contains either nothing at all or information that could prove disastrous to them

      Schrödinger worked for SCO?

    4. Re:Buy any computers and hard drives for sale by ISurfTooMuch · · Score: 1

      No, but Darl claimed that he stole the whole dead/alive cat thing from SCO. Darl said that being either dead or alive is a binary concept, and since computers are binary devices, and since SCO writes computer software, then the whole concept of binary is their intellectual property, so Schrodinger owes them around $10 quadrillion. SCO is also suing every cat in the world, both living and dead, claiming that, as a result of Schrodinger's blatant IP violations, all cats are required to purchase licenses from SCO in order to exist. Darl also considered suing rats, mice, and other assorted vermin on the theory that SCO's IP umbrella extended to them because of their close predator-prey relationship with cats, but the whole thing fell apart when he realized that he fell into that category of vermin and therefore would be in the awkward position of suing himself. He wasn't opposed to doing this, but the lawyers weren't sure how they'd get paid, since Darl would be both the winner and loser in such a case, so they refused to go forward.

  27. As I recall by fwarren · · Score: 3, Funny

    I believe my share is supposed to be $699 per CPU.

    Better put me down for several thousand dollars. I have installed Linux quite a few times

    --
    vi + /etc over regedit any day of the week.
  28. That should really be worth a lot... by damn_registrars · · Score: 1, Insightful

    After bankruptcy in September 2007, SCO and an affiliate filed schedules listing combined assets of $14.2 million and debt totaling $5.2 million

    After almost three years of depreciation, I'm sure their assets are worth a lot. I have a few three-year old computers around, I'll happily sell them for cheese.

    --
    Damn_registrars has no butt-hole. Damn_registrars has no use for a butt-hole.
    1. Re:That should really be worth a lot... by confused+one · · Score: 1

      Yeah, that's pretty typical in these auctions... They value the property too high. Used office chair: $250. 3yr old PC: $800. 5yr old server (no software): $8,000. Intellectual Property: $2,500,000,000. Stupidity like that.

    2. Re:That should really be worth a lot... by Will.Woodhull · · Score: 1

      combined assets of $14.2 million and debt totaling $5.2 million

      I don't think those numbers are right. I don't think you can file for bankruptcy if your assets are roughly three times greater than your debts.

      Or is there another way of reading the sentence that I am not seeing?

      --
      Will
    3. Re:That should really be worth a lot... by mr_mischief · · Score: 1

      I can get you lots of cheese. How many pounds of cheddar for a Core 2 Duo with 2 gigs of RAM?

    4. Re:That should really be worth a lot... by mr_mischief · · Score: 1

      The combined assets likely include non-liquid assets like real estate and office furniture. IANAL, but from my understanding you can go into Chapter 11 pretty much any time your liquidity falters and you can't realistically service your debts and still maintain business procedures.

  29. All I want is "Blepp's briefcase" to put on my by PB8 · · Score: 1

    mantle, perhaps snuggled between a couple of Emperor Penguin statues.

    It could be fun to buy the filing cabinet's in which SCO's version of Novel's letters were found and put it in a 'haunted house' tableau for geeks. Maybe any pens embossed with the name of Boies's law firm. Of course any paper stock certificates. How about any left over servers, tape backups, CDs, DVDs etc. that, they might have laying about? I hope they still have more CDs sets of those 'scanned' in source code pages they tried to foist on IBM as satisfying discovery for the SCO source code. Those might make a heck of a mobile or chandelier.

    I do hope the OS software developers get a chance to take home any memento they might want.

  30. First time I've sworn on here... by Slartibartfast · · Score: 1

    GOOD FUCKING RIDDANCE.

    I mean, sure, this is the final phase of beating a dead horse. But dear LORD, this took for ever. Finally -- finally! -- SCO and AdTI are both "yesterday's news."

    1. Re:First time I've sworn on here... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you think this is the end of it, you haven't been paying attention.

    2. Re:First time I've sworn on here... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nice to see you Darl, how's that Linux licensing program/extortion scheme working out for you? Not so well from what I hear.

  31. Be careful what you wish for... by Qubit · · Score: 1

    "I'd also like to be there when they cut off Darl McBride's head and stick it on a pike as a warning to the next ten generations of intellectual property lawyers that for some favors, even $600 is too high a price. I would look up into his lifeless eyes and wave, like this. *smileywave*. Can you the United States Trustees arrange that for me, Judge Stewart?"

    The thing is, Vir, if you're saying that Darl is just the front man for a Shadowy evil, then what are we in store for next?

    --

    coding is life /* the rest is */
    1. Re:Be careful what you wish for... by khellendros1984 · · Score: 1

      Obviously SCO's bitter minions are going to poison the source trees of all open source projects, and it will be the job of the one project that escaped infection to scour the corners of the internet for the cure.

      --
      It is pitch black. You are likely to be eaten by a grue.
    2. Re:Be careful what you wish for... by Lorien_the_first_one · · Score: 1

      That's what I thought. I knew Mr. Morden was in there somewhere.

      --
      The diversity and expression of human opinion is essential to human survival.
    3. Re:Be careful what you wish for... by Kielistic · · Score: 1

      And then get canceled before we know what the cure is. :(

    4. Re:Be careful what you wish for... by Qubit · · Score: 1

      Lorien_the_first_one (1178397)

      You know something is wrong with the Universe when Lorien's UID is longer than your own...

      --

      coding is life /* the rest is */
    5. Re:Be careful what you wish for... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's what I thought. I knew Mr. Morden was in there somewhere.

      I don't care what Mr. McBride wants. I don't care who Mr. McBride is. What I want to know - and since you're here, maybe you can help - is why Mr. McBride still is. :)

  32. Or his house? by whoever57 · · Score: 4, Informative

    You can bid on Darl's house on September 14:
    Go here Select Utah, then Salt Lake, then Look down the page for "VINTAGE OAK"

    --
    The real "Libtards" are the Libertarians!
    1. Re:Or his house? by Penguinisto · · Score: 1

      So waitaminute... you'd think he made a killing off of kiting SCO stock as hard as he did. Now his house is up for foreclosure?

      The only guess I can make is that the idiot over-invested in real estate... which in turn only bolsters the phrase "never attribute to malice what can be better described by stupidity". That is, maybe McBride really is that stupid (well, okay, like we needed even more proof, but still...)

      House is in one hell of a nice neighborhood, though...

      --
      Quo usque tandem abutere, Nimbus, patientia nostra?
    2. Re:Or his house? by Dee+Ann_1 · · Score: 1

      Not a bad looking house.. http://goo.gl/maps/QrPT

    3. Re:Or his house? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you lookup the address on zillow you get a value estimate...

    4. Re:Or his house? by PseudonymousBraveguy · · Score: 2, Funny

      Nice house, but I'd fear it's haunted by the ghosts of the countless unicorns he had to kill to keep SCOX un-dead for so long.

  33. A fart in the universe... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Are all the millions of lines of infringing code they barked about being auctioned too ?

  34. The Assets Will Be Sold by Walter+Wart · · Score: 1

    But the lawsuits will continue!

    --
    The man who never alters his opinion is like the stagnant water and breeds Reptiles of the Mind -- William Blake
    1. Re:The Assets Will Be Sold by mr_mischief · · Score: 2, Informative

      Of course! They are in reorganization bankruptcy, not full receivership. Once they auction off enough to pay Novell, they'll appeal again and try to get that money back.

  35. Liquidation by macraig · · Score: 1

    I'd like to be in the viewing audience when they liquidate Darl.

    1. Re:Liquidation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Popping the pimple, so to speak?

    2. Re:Liquidation by symbolset · · Score: 1

      Sorry, I read that as "liquify" the first time. I would definitely PPV that.

      --
      Help stamp out iliturcy.
    3. Re:Liquidation by macraig · · Score: 1

      I think I prefer your interpretation. Let the liquefaction begin.

  36. Physicsdot FTW... by Qubit · · Score: 1

    Okay,

    Assumptions (mostly from wikipedia):

    • Darl is of negligible height, standing on the surface of the Earth which we can regard as a sphere of mass 6.0 x 10^24 kg and radius 6.3 x 10^6 m.
    • High Earth Orbit (HEO) is roughly 3.6 x 10^7 m above the Earth; Low Earth Orbit (LEO) is 1.60 x 10^5 - 2.0 * 10^6 m above, so let's use the lower number for the bare minimum.
    • gunpowder has "3 megajoules per kilogram.".
    • Assume a human head masses around 5kg. But take out the brains and just use the skull, and we're talking ~ 1 kg.
    • Oh, yes, and Gravity (constant) is 6.67 x 10^-11

    Given these numbers, how many kg of gunpowder would you need to shove into a .45 cartridge (warning: may not be physically possible) to get Darl's skull into LEO and into HEO?

    --

    coding is life /* the rest is */
    1. Re:Physicsdot FTW... by mr_mischief · · Score: 1

      Well, technically the caliber is only the diameter. A .45 ACP has a fixed length, but I'm sure we could come up with a really long cartridge that's still only .45" in diameter for just this one shot. We could call it the .45 BSD.

    2. Re:Physicsdot FTW... by Ambvai · · Score: 2, Informative

      More from Wikipedia...

      When accounting only for mass, gravity, and altitude, the equation is: U = mgh, where U is the potential energy of the object relative to its being on the Earth's surface, m is the mass of the object, g is the acceleration due to gravity, and h is the altitude of the object. If m is expressed in kilograms, g in meters per second squared and h in meters then U will be calculated in joules.

      U = 1kg*9.81m/s^2*2.0*10^6 = 19620000j / 3000000j/kg = 6.54kg of gunpowder.

      From wiki.answers.com:

      The densities of modern powders vary from something a bit over 0.07 grams per cubic centimeter to something over 0.16 grams per cubic centimeter.

      So lets say we're using something on the denser side--

      6540g/0.16g/cc = 40875/cc

      So, to blow off his head and put it in orbit, you need to put about 41 liters or 11 gallons force worth of gunpowder into pushing that empty skull straight into the atmosphere.

    3. Re:Physicsdot FTW... by Qubit · · Score: 1

      We could call it the .45 BSD.

      I'd be half tempted to call it the ".45 in your FACE!"... which is...actually...rather quite appropriate for our purposes.

      --

      coding is life /* the rest is */
    4. Re:Physicsdot FTW... by spitzak · · Score: 1

      You will however need a thruster or something to circularize the orbit! Otherwise it will hit the earth again...

    5. Re:Physicsdot FTW... by Indy1 · · Score: 1

      I don't know how much gunpowder it would take, but I'd be willing to donate a 8lb keg of HP38 to do some testing :)

      --
      Lawyers, MBA's, RIAA? A jedi fears not these things!
    6. Re:Physicsdot FTW... by Qubit · · Score: 1

      I'd be willing to donate a 8lb keg of HP38 to do some testing

      How many is that?

      --

      coding is life /* the rest is */
    7. Re:Physicsdot FTW... by Qubit · · Score: 1

      Otherwise it will hit the earth again...

      By G'Quan, he would make a very satisfying thump when he hits the ground, no?

      And come to think of it, why is it that everyone seems so excited about doing something with Darl's detached head? Maybe SCO could auction the head off and make enough money to keep on going for a couple of years...

      ..woof! Now there's a scary thought!

      --

      coding is life /* the rest is */
    8. Re:Physicsdot FTW... by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      When accounting only for mass, gravity, and altitude, the equation is: U = mgh

      Wikipedia is wrong - g is the acceleration due to gravity at the Earth's surface.

      Since the actual gravitation acceleration an object experiences depends on its altitude that equation is only a valid approximation to integral F. ds for smallish values of h, where small = nowhere near big enough to orbit a planet.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  37. SCO is dying by Jon+Abbott · · Score: 1

    This begs for a "SCO is dying" post.

  38. Open boil by oldmeddler · · Score: 1

    Make that "an open boil on the Anus of society" and I'm in.

  39. Could we buy the brand? by Qbertino · · Score: 3, Funny

    Couldn't the slashdot community buy the brand? If everybody donates a few bucks and we bid that sum for the brand and then use it to release FOSS, print cool t-shirts and use the sco website to make fun and jokes about MS, Mc Bride or whatever the f*ck his name is and his entourage. Wouldn't that be worth it? Ever since they did the caldera back-and-forth and then switched to pissing of the entire nix community the brand is dead anyway. It can't be that expensive, no?

    We could also release a debian rebrand as 'SCO Unix 2010' for 200$ a pop and donate the proceeds to EFF, FSF and any other organisation that goes against patent and IP trolls. That would actually be usefull, no?

    Just an idea.

    --
    We suffer more in our imagination than in reality. - Seneca
    1. Re:Could we buy the brand? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I like your idea. I wish to contribute ZWL 1,000,...,000 to the cause.

    2. Re:Could we buy the brand? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't know- but they have an awesome domain name. That name is worth ALLOT!

    3. Re:Could we buy the brand? by badkarmadayaccount · · Score: 1

      NetBSD rebrand - we need binary compatibility, don't forget.

      --
      I know tobacco is bad for you, so I smoke weed with crack.
  40. Die already by daveX99 · · Score: 1

    Is there some way to flash mob the auction and coordinate things so that nobody pays more than 25 fucking cents for anything? Or nothing? The trash can just be dropped in a dumpster. Gah! The wicked witch is (very nearly, almost, but like a zombie, not quite) dead. Can I get a pic of the wooden stake? I'd bid on that.

  41. Oooooh Yeah by multipartmixed · · Score: 1

    Disco STU is gonna do some GRAVE DANCIN'

    Oh Yeah!

    --

    Do daemons dream of electric sleep()?
  42. Fine Print by WillRobinson · · Score: 1

    The trustee's sale of the aforedescribed real property will be made without warranty as to title, possession, or encumbrances.

    Sounds like selling a pig in a poke.

  43. some corrections by RobertLTux · · Score: 1

    1 they will be defeated in the IBM case by something called THE TRUTH
    2 they have been roasted in court by NOVELL (and what a long slow roast it has been)

    --
    Any person using FTFY or editing my postings agrees to a US$50.00 charge
  44. Darl Dunk Tank by Greyfox · · Score: 1

    I'd drop $5 for a shot to dunk Darl. Any trustees wanna go for it?

    --

    I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?

    1. Re:Darl Dunk Tank by dklon · · Score: 1

      As long as it's a dunk tank filled with liquid nitrogen, I'd pay.

  45. Can I buy it? by El_Oscuro · · Score: 1

    I have got a few hundred dollars. The name and logo should be worth at least that. Perhaps I could build a Linux distro...

    --
    "Be grateful for what you have. You may never know when you may lose it."
  46. How about ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    a nice big box of "Fuck you, Darl."?

  47. C'mon, this is /. by Grog6 · · Score: 1

    What is bid for a Darl swirly in the Goatse guys Arse?

    Bidding starts at $100.

    There's a rumor that Natalie Portman is warming hot grits in Soviet Russia at the thought of posted photos... :)

    --
    Truth isn't Truth - Guliani
  48. Or maybe by overshoot · · Score: 1
    ... a wart.

    Or a chancre.

    --
    Lacking <sarcasm> tags, /. substitutes moderation as "Troll."
    1. Re:Or maybe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      anyone thinking of wiki and chancre, don't

  49. Hate to bust your bubble... by symbolset · · Score: 1

    I hate to bust your bubble, but it ain't over. It could be years yet before the shambling hulk is chopped to bits, burned and its ashes scattered. At least twice there have been property transfers that could resurrect the case once that's done.

    This one could be with us for a long while yet. Dammit.

    --
    Help stamp out iliturcy.
  50. Anything of Value? by thogard · · Score: 4, Interesting

    They have two things that would be good for open source. One is the old "Documenter's Workbench". It was a proofing tool that had lots of good AI stuff from Bell Labs. The other useful thing they might have as the old Toolchest selection of software. I figure either would be worth $100 or so just to release into the public domain. The spell checker in the DW had some interesting stuff like knowing how you make typos and it also had some ideas about reducing vocabulary so the wrong synonym was less likely to end up in your technical document.

  51. Story from the top by salesgeek · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Ok, let's see if I have the story right:

    1. Caldera sells OpenLinux.
    2. Caldera sells company to a group of stupid, evil or evil & stupid investors.
    3. SCO seeing Linux eating up their microcomputer Unix biz sells it to Caldera.
    4 Caldera rebrands as SCO and the real SCO changes in to Tarantella.
    6. SCO tries to get everyone who has linux to give them some money for a promise not to sue or something because they own Unix.
    7. SCO decides that IBM and AutoZone are good targets for a bizarre lawsuit, despite both firms having at least as much money as God.
    8. Somewhere along the line someone points out that SCO does not actually own the copyrights to Unix, and they distributed Linux under the GPL for a long time. And bragged to the public about it.
    9. SCO sues Novel hoping that the judge will have a bad day and just give the copyrights to Unix to them and break a contract that they accidentally bought from SCO.
    10 SCO sees that the judge is not going to have a bad day, and files for bankruptcy to get another judge, who may have a bad day and make SCO's fantasy reality.
    11. Bankruptcy judge does not have a bad day.
    12. SCO tries to appeal, but appears to have ran out of gas.

    --
    -- $G
    1. Re:Story from the top by Chrisq · · Score: 1

      Ok, let's see if I have the story right:

      1. Caldera sells OpenLinux. 2. Caldera sells company to a group of stupid, evil or evil & stupid investors. 3. SCO seeing Linux eating up their microcomputer Unix biz sells it to Caldera. 4 Caldera rebrands as SCO and the real SCO changes in to Tarantella. 6. SCO tries to get everyone who has linux to give them some money for a promise not to sue or something because they own Unix. 7. SCO decides that IBM and AutoZone are good targets for a bizarre lawsuit, despite both firms having at least as much money as God. 8. Somewhere along the line someone points out that SCO does not actually own the copyrights to Unix, and they distributed Linux under the GPL for a long time. And bragged to the public about it. 9. SCO sues Novel hoping that the judge will have a bad day and just give the copyrights to Unix to them and break a contract that they accidentally bought from SCO. 10 SCO sees that the judge is not going to have a bad day, and files for bankruptcy to get another judge, who may have a bad day and make SCO's fantasy reality. 11. Bankruptcy judge does not have a bad day. 12. SCO tries to appeal, but appears to have ran out of gas.

      Unfortunately this is starting to look like one of those "B" movies where every time you think the monster is dead it gets up again. Is it coincidence that you stopped before 13?

    2. Re:Story from the top by salesgeek · · Score: 1

      Step 13 is step 1 in the sequel.

      --
      -- $G
    3. Re:Story from the top by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      13. ???

      14. PROFIT!

  52. I'm gonna own SCOSource by Deputy+Doodah · · Score: 2

    I'll give them $12 for their SCOSource business. Maybe I can write it off on my taxes and make a profit.

  53. SCO still on life support by cubicle · · Score: 1

    It is just a Java patent, and a non troll patent company is going to buy it, so SCO is still a company if you were hoping to dance at SCO's funeral pyre no such luck. here is the story at GrokLaw

    http://www.groklaw.net/articlebasic.php?story=20100329223904478

    --
    To err is to be human, to really screw up takes a computer and a human.
  54. Penny auction Re:There is a tradition. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Lol,

    If good guys got stuff for 1 penny.... but I'm guessing that the guys who are getting rich of this deal would bid 2 cents... because then they'd be able to keep the junk and the money.

    We don't need these guys to get anything.

    (

  55. Chip in to buy the Companies Instead by Walt+Sellers · · Score: 2, Interesting

    It might be more productive if we could chip in to a single non-profit company that would buy up the absurd patents or the entire company that holds them.

    The company could put them into the public domain, or just blanket-license them for members at low cost.

  56. Sco assest sale. Linux!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Anyone know the starting bid on Linux licenses?

  57. scotum.us by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    is available.

  58. Note to Caldera/SCO by kimvette · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Thank you for Caldera Network Desktop, which made online package repositories work well. It was a groundbreaking product that could have been the dominant distribution today if you hadn't given in to the dark side of the force. Caldera Network Desktop was a wonderful Linux distro - for the time it was a well-polished distribution that worked, and was a lot less work to configure than Slackware or even Red Hat Linux.

    Sadly, you let scumbags like Darl McBride steer you wrong. You became greedy and tried to reneg on the GPL, i.e., the code that you contributed to Linux kernel. You tried to steal UNIX from Novell and engaged in pump&dump schemes, ripping off your shareholders and your customers alike. By 2000, Redhat had long passed you by, because you lost your way, and by the time 2005 rolled around, every other distro grew in popularity and have been earning good returns for the respective disributions' sponsors and for integrators alike.

    We will take the good - the code you released under the GPL, and leave the bad - that is, your total bullshit and your douchebag manner of doing business the last 10 years. Although you contributed a lot to Linux in your pre-McBride years, you will not be missed. I hope Darl McBride and any board and senior staff members who endorsed his pump & dump schemes are indicted for securities fraud and malfeasance, because through your actions it is self-evident that you ultimately did not have your shareholders' concerns at heart, but only extracting as much as you could into your own pockets. For that, and for trying to monopolize Linux and UNIX alike and contributing to Microsoft's FUD campaign which encouraged enterprises to avoid *nix and stick with the Windows malaise, fuck you very much.

    --
    The Christian Right is Neither (Christian nor right). See: Matthew 23, Matthew 25, Ezekiel 16:48-50
    1. Re:Note to Caldera/SCO by dbIII · · Score: 2, Informative

      Caldera Network Desktop

      Trolltech of Qt fame probably did all of the polishing that impressed you. They were contracted to do a lot of work on it at the time and threw in the tetris game you get to play during installation.

    2. Re:Note to Caldera/SCO by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      I think the Tetris game during the installer had always been a Caldera gimmick. I distinctly remember Caldera Linux 1.3, which still had a text-mode installer, had the Tetris game during the installer.

      I remember the Caldera 2.3 installer being amazing for the time, being able to run X11 and Qt right from the CD. It was quite well designed, asking configuration questions while copying files. And the game after all of the questions were answered was icing on the cake :) I haven't seen a modern Linux distribution that does this, though the point is a bit moot now since installs are so much faster and take place in a live environment anyways (in most distros).

    3. Re:Note to Caldera/SCO by dbIII · · Score: 1

      Mr W. Allison at Trolltech wrote that installer.

  59. IBM should buy everything they can by Interfacer · · Score: 1

    And then erect a great bonfire with everything they've bought; Perhaps even driving a wooden stake through a boxed copy of whatever SCO was still selling, after sprinkling it with holy water first. And at the end, the ashes could be scattered in the wind or buried underneath a crossroads...

    IBM already made an example of them. This would be a nice way to end the saga.

  60. Incorrect reference by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In the blurb, it said "'Thanks for being a pimple on the face of humanity' present." What I really think they meant to say is: "Thanks for being a pimple on the butt of humanity' present."

  61. Seriously, anything worth buying? by Bitmanhome · · Score: 1

    Surely SCO still has some paying customers. Is there any part of the company worth buying? Is SCO Unix going to be auctioned or not? It would be nice to throw everything into the open-source pool, but that's not necessary. Simply buying the company and turning it back into an ordinary software business should make many people very happy.

    And where would I go to bid? Or at least watch and point and laugh? TFA contained no details.

    --
    Not that this wasn't entirely predictable.
    1. Re:Seriously, anything worth buying? by ascari · · Score: 1

      Simply buying the company and turning it back into an ordinary software business should make many people very happy.

      More like some troll will buy it and continue the "worthy" battle. Maybe with Darl as consultant? You see, this kind of scum never loses.

  62. Here are the pics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Heh. So Daryl lived in a tract McMansion. Zestimate of $1.1 M. Pics here:

    http://www.zillow.com/homedetails/1799-Vintage-Oak-Ln-Salt-Lake-City-UT-84121/12870753_zpid/

    You've got to wonder how he managed to screw up and lose it.

  63. Must Be All Dried Up by DynaSoar · · Score: 1

    This news is better than it sounds. SCO's contract with its landsharks specified that, win or lose, they'd get a chunk of the company. Since there's no buyer as yet (per TFA) they must not want their pound of McBride-flesh. Meaning there ain't squat left from which anyone might try to rebuild this Tinker Toy tyranasaur into a viable enterprise. Go ahead and bury it and don't mind the twitches. Those are just press releases making it appear as if its still alive. Oh no, they say he's got to go, oh no Darlzilla.

    --
    "I may be synthetic, but I'm not stupid." -- Bishop 341-B
    1. Re:Must Be All Dried Up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Oh no, there goes S.C.O

      Go go Darlzilla

  64. Head is not available by Burning1 · · Score: 1

    Unfortunately, Darl McBride's head is listed among SCO's liabilities rather than their assets.

  65. Don't bother, they had nothing by dbIII · · Score: 1

    It's like the WMD - if they actually had them they would have used them.

    1. Re:Don't bother, they had nothing by ISurfTooMuch · · Score: 1

      Oh, I know they had nothing, but there may be some incriminating evidence that shows they knew they had nothing, or maybe it would show that they were being sponsored by a large, well known software company that we can all name.

  66. SCO is still worth $$$! (yes! Three bucks!) by CuteSteveJobs · · Score: 1

    SCO's shareholders do have some assets left: A legitimate claim to sue the idiot CEO and lawyers who flew this once iconic company into a hillside.

    And as tarnished as SCO's brand name is, it would still be an improvement for Xe nee Blackwater, Accenture nee Arthur Andersen, Monsanto, Goldman Sachs, Enron and BP.

  67. Don't worry, be happy by mpol · · Score: 1

    I never posted this, so maybe I should now I still have the chance :).
    Just before old SCO was bought by Caldera a friend of mine worked there in pre-sales. He did a lot of stuff with both of their UNIXes and Tarantella. He also had a lot of contact (we live in Holland) with the UK division of SCO. There they did a lot of stuff with Linux, sold support, and there were even rumours that they were working on their own distro of Linux.
    On some fairs they even sold Linux T-shirts. I posted some pics of one here:
    http://www.chaosmongers.org/sco.php
    The company is all turned to shit now, but the Linux-history of old SCO is quite interesting I think. But ofcourse there's also the situation that new SCO is actually Caldera, a straight Linux company.

    --

    Well, don't worry about that. We can get you back before you leave. (Dr. Who)
  68. No, that means DMcB gets 10dollars by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No, that means DMcB gets 10dollars he wouldn't have had otherwise.

    No matter how insulting the pay offer, it still pays DMcB and that's far more insulting to the person paying.

  69. What? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Do you mean you didn't know?

  70. SCO won over Novell? by Jerry · · Score: 1

    "The bankruptcy judge called for a Chapter 11 trustee in August 2009, about one month before the U.S. Court of Appeals in Denver ruled in the company's favor after six years of litigation with Waltham, Massachusetts-based Novell Inc. The case went back to the district court, where the judge and jury further clarified SCO's rights in certain Unix software incorporated in software for network systems.

    All this time I thought that Novell had won the court case and proved that SCO didn't have any Unix "rights". How could the bankruptcy judge get it so wrong?

    --

    Running with Linux for over 20 years!

  71. Auction to include SCO lawyers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I would be happy to pay $3 each for SCO snakes if purchase would include right to kill them by various slow methods. Price could be higher, if not for expense of hazardous waste disposal.
    Wonder if a trash to power plant would accept the carcases?