hirez proof. Is it a wonder he can't get laid? Half of slashdot looks like him. Put down the cheez poofs and try a crystal meth diet you fucking piece of shit.
Speaking only for myself, access to source code has let me identify new vulnerabilities a lot faster than black box testing. Easier discovering? Yes. But that doesn't mean the bugs will be reported (I gave up -- too many arrogant programmers that aren't as smart as they think they are), the code fixed, or the users updated.
bitkeeper is not FREE software. I cannot use it in good conscience, and neither should you. For all intents and purposes, their source code is locked away.
if the file is appended, the ctime will be updated. the BSD tail checks for an inode change or a decrease in filesize (and reopens in that case). Otherwise, the file descriptor is kept open and continually read from. When new data is written to the file, it will be available for reading automatically.
For all the haters out there, let me just say that I like linux and I like ubuntu. Being community based, they've managed to get popular without getting the illwill that red hat did. And I think this is a good thing in general, but let's be honest: Dell sucks. This would have been great news 5 years ago when Dell was the top dog, but now they're racing to the bottom. HP/Compaq, Gateway, Lenevo, etc are eating their lunch. Apple is where it's at.
I've started a letter writing campaign to Steve Jobs to encourage him to sell Macintosh computers preloaded with Linux. Apple is on the leading edge of personal computing (or at least the journalists and newsmakers seem to think so). If we could encourage them to ship an iMac with ubuntu linux (or maybe kubuntu), that would have a halo effect. Curious people would install ubuntu on their home pcs. Maybe Apple will even open source iWork (Pages/Keynote/Numbers) and we'll finally have a decent word processor and spreadsheet.
Some devices are designed to deny users access to install or run
modified versions of the software inside them. This is fundamentally incompatible with the aim of
protecting users' freedom to change the software. The systematic
pattern of such abuse occurs in the area of products for individuals to
use, which is precisely where it is most unacceptable. Therefore, we
have designed this version of the GPL to prohibit the practice for those
products. If such problems arise substantially in other domains, we
stand ready to extend this provision to those domains in future versions
of the GPL, as needed to protect the freedom of users.
the GPL isn't about free it's about FREEDOM -- the rights of the end user to modify the program. Will I, as an end user of a GPL processor, be able to modify the processor? This looks like yet another big company abusing the spirit, if not the letter, of the GPL.
the original 3 HTTP methods were GET, PUT, and DELETE. POST/cgi came later. PUT and DELETE are used today in WEBDAV but not as originally intended (think wiki).
most of the comments on kotaku.com seem to be "open ended = bad." I have to disagree. I forced myself to play through Warcraft III but gave up on the xp because the storyline was too contrived and too repetitive.
We also used the Fortify static analysis tool to identify
potential problem areas that warranted further manual investigation.
If I'm not mistaken, Fortify analysis showed more problems in the Linux kernel than in the Windows NT kernel, but most of the linux problems were later shown to be shortcomings with the automated analysis, not a design/programing flaw in Linux.
Diebold may have problems, but the use of Fortify (or similar) doesn't convince me.
Slashdot Mirror
hirez proof. Is it a wonder he can't get laid? Half of slashdot looks like him. Put down the cheez poofs and try a crystal meth diet you fucking piece of shit.
who knows what kind of data mining they'll be doing.
Personally, I prefer VAGINA - VMWare, Apache, GNU, Ingres, NetBSD, Ada. I'm not sure why more slashdotters don't try it.
Speaking only for myself, access to source code has let me identify new vulnerabilities a lot faster than black box testing. Easier discovering? Yes. But that doesn't mean the bugs will be reported (I gave up -- too many arrogant programmers that aren't as smart as they think they are), the code fixed, or the users updated.
user mode linux to the rescue!
bitkeeper is not FREE software. I cannot use it in good conscience, and neither should you. For all intents and purposes, their source code is locked away.
FAPP: FreeBSD Apache, PostgreSQL, Perl.
They are planning an IPO.
as someone who uses PostgreSQL, i hope not.
If it's any consolation, you did get the coveted first typo.
s/ctime/mtime/
if the file is appended, the ctime will be updated. the BSD tail checks for an inode change or a decrease in filesize (and reopens in that case). Otherwise, the file descriptor is kept open and continually read from. When new data is written to the file, it will be available for reading automatically.
that's contrary to the ideals of free software. if the FSF considers that ok then we need a new license which ensures software (and hardware) freedom.
For all the haters out there, let me just say that I like linux and I like ubuntu. Being community based, they've managed to get popular without getting the illwill that red hat did. And I think this is a good thing in general, but let's be honest: Dell sucks. This would have been great news 5 years ago when Dell was the top dog, but now they're racing to the bottom. HP/Compaq, Gateway, Lenevo, etc are eating their lunch. Apple is where it's at.
I've started a letter writing campaign to Steve Jobs to encourage him to sell Macintosh computers preloaded with Linux. Apple is on the leading edge of personal computing (or at least the journalists and newsmakers seem to think so). If we could encourage them to ship an iMac with ubuntu linux (or maybe kubuntu), that would have a halo effect. Curious people would install ubuntu on their home pcs. Maybe Apple will even open source iWork (Pages/Keynote/Numbers) and we'll finally have a decent word processor and spreadsheet.
From the GPL (3):
Some devices are designed to deny users access to install or run modified versions of the software inside them. This is fundamentally incompatible with the aim of protecting users' freedom to change the software. The systematic pattern of such abuse occurs in the area of products for individuals to use, which is precisely where it is most unacceptable. Therefore, we have designed this version of the GPL to prohibit the practice for those products. If such problems arise substantially in other domains, we stand ready to extend this provision to those domains in future versions of the GPL, as needed to protect the freedom of users.
the GPL isn't about free it's about FREEDOM -- the rights of the end user to modify the program. Will I, as an end user of a GPL processor, be able to modify the processor? This looks like yet another big company abusing the spirit, if not the letter, of the GPL.
"researching their own chip design" = industrial espionage in taiwan for the latest x86 design.
fortunately, the moderation system exists so we don't have to independently decide if a post is funny , informative, offtopic, etc.
the original 3 HTTP methods were GET, PUT, and DELETE. POST/cgi came later. PUT and DELETE are used today in WEBDAV but not as originally intended (think wiki).
check your favorite torrent tracker.
this wouldn't be a problem if they used the BSD license.
the article does mention the thor unit which takes significantly longer to turn around.
most of the comments on kotaku.com seem to be "open ended = bad." I have to disagree. I forced myself to play through Warcraft III but gave up on the xp because the storyline was too contrived and too repetitive.
We also used the Fortify static analysis tool to identify potential problem areas that warranted further manual investigation.
If I'm not mistaken, Fortify analysis showed more problems in the Linux kernel than in the Windows NT kernel, but most of the linux problems were later shown to be shortcomings with the automated analysis, not a design/programing flaw in Linux.
Diebold may have problems, but the use of Fortify (or similar) doesn't convince me.
my experience has been that Fireworks compresses gif better than equivalent png files, but running them through pngcrush beats gif.