Some games like Angrt Birds make more money from the Ad version than the paid version. Simply because people are playing them all the time and after 40+ hours the ads are worth more. That's why you see some apps without pay versions at all, particularly in Android where prices are "too low" already then they don't have to compete with cracked pay versions..
But there are people that would "program" the town "idiot" to do something terrible , like say plant a bunch of bags containing bombs.
Is a mentally handicap person capable of understanding that the heavy bags were bombs? Or just that somebody gave them cookies to carry stuff around town as "birthday presents".
That's the true insanity defense. The court tolerates it because much of the time a person was directed by someone else.. Or they really had a psychotic episode.
The third one is WORST. it proves INTENT and CONTROL of himself. A home full of weapons BOOBY-TRAPPED so the police couldn't enter after arresting him clearly points to pre-intention to commit the crime. He left details about the crime at the house.. Then committed said crime with guns and ammo from that cache.
Is that part of a larger "Joker fantasy"? But he clearly INTENDED to committ the crimes when he left his house with traps and an armload of guns.
The judge is almost going to go for it... But he is making the EXPECTATION that as part of therapy, the court will expect DETAILED accounts of what happened... And there will be so much information gathered the shooter will NEVER be able to prove he "won't ever" do it again. Therefore stay locked up. If the state doesn't have the death penalty one place is as good as another.
What the Judge is promising is that these tests will be through so that in 5 or 10 years NOBODY feels sorry for this guy or can claim "he's cured".
The serum is to verify EVENTS not sanity. Once he declares "insane" he goes to being a ward of the state and he cannot be CONVICTED of crimes.
As a ward of the state he can be physically compelled to give evidence or have test done to ensure truthiness. That evidence WILL be used to show he methodically planned and hid his actions... So it will keep him locked up... Forever. But that's not CRIMINAL evidence, that is phychiatric evidence used for the CIVIL determination he is unsafe.
Also, this wil allow the court to know if anybody else was involved or contributing as this guy will be immune from prosecution.
Once you declare "insanity" you are safe from prosecution.... BUT you're a permant ward of the State until they feel you are safe to release. As a "ward" you are treated like a child in that you cannot legally "lie" because you are handicap..., but that doesn't mean the court cannot order therapy to attempt to see through the psychosis.
I think this is a slightly veiled threat that if he chooses the "insanity" defense he is going to be treated like a dumb, violent animal... Forever. After the judge starts the process, you can't undo your declaration, ever.
But it's stick with Manning. He was basically IT like most of us. IT staff see and hear people PLAN to violate contracts or the law, or just plain be dicks a lot more than most people. But at the point you dump your bosses email box and hand it to the press, you better have a really good reason. We all miss that what he did was a MASSIVE breach of trust that would get ANY of US fired just for discussing on the job.
Does the public DESERVE to see that important WAR decisions are made based on grade school playground spats. ABSOLUTELY. Did he violate his employers trust, absolutely as well.
People are quite toxic when you shove dead ones shoulder to shoulder hundreds to an acre. The land chosen for graveyards isn't usually the best anyway (to wet, to dry, too rock for crops) so it would become a problem.
How about we say it this way. When I'm in public I expect to be seen by the OTHER PEOPLE who are in public too. They might remember with their minds, bring recording and off-site storage into this and its not the same thing.
Where is the expectation that I have to worry about non-marked recording devices who's OWNERS are not in public for me to see?
Being "in public" does not mean recorded by automatic equipment forever and ever. THAT is the fallacy. How about this, all owners and manufactures of automated recording equipment have to have THEIR google Glass feed available at all times at any camera location! Now we are equal in public.
For instance even at the SuperDish game which is extremely highly surveilled, you STILL expect privacy inside the restroom. Is GOOGLE going to guarantee that with this product?
I think the Europeans have the right QUESTION on their statement "the right to be forgotten."
I understand I am going to be on quicki-mart cameras for security, and ATM machines and the like. The EXPECTATION is that the OWNER of the location has limited funds to keep those longer than needed for security. Because keeping piles of junk is expensive. That's far different than what is starting up to SELL that information to somebody else. That somebody else is not EVER going to remove the data... Google Glass is one of the collection mechanisms... Specifically to capture and store information about EVERYBODY ELSE. And what THEY are going around you.
That's what Google is selling.. Go back ten years and you automatically captured video... Look you were in the bar with people that are famous now because we got their info years later.. Better yet, they were cheating on their second wife before they got divorced from the first.
You will note all the people that OWN. These companies keep technology far away. Microsoft deletes emails after 30 days, Zuckerberg never updates HIS Facebook relationship status, and so on.. They don't trust all this collected information and they claim to OWN it... Why should YOU.
How is this more efficient than Bump? It's an iPhone app that you tap your phones as the cue to send the file (from the queue on your phone).. No special chips like NFC.
Google Glass doesn't work that way. It it's on, it UPLOADS.
The owner is totally correct, put the devices in your pocket, please. If the owner is really serious, he's going to have to get the copper mesh upgrade when he remodels... Make the whole place a Faraday cage then no signals get out. Problem solved!
Normal whistle blowers have legal protection... When you whistle blow THE LAW that's what you get. They probably will push to execute him. The military doesn't have provisions for whistle blowing against the civilians.. Spreading secrets is treason... Even if when people label their own treason "secret".
He mentions scientific fraud, but when the school is EXPELLING 60 students over ONE incident, they are looking at the "academic death sentence" if they find professors involved in any way.
Having professors involved would be the WORST possible outcome the University would have. They were looking for blood, there is probably a secret organization that would have "suicided" the offending professors... After they were pubically tarted and feathered (Harvard has old traditions) Privacy was the least concern.
The ACCUSATION OF CHEATING at the level of Harvard is a professional "death sentence". Frankly, the accusations by the expelled students were probably cause to look at the professors.
If this went WRONG these Professors would have found out when security locked them out of their offices... And escorted them off campus. This wasn't going through the union, board, require process... This was Academic "Sudden Death". Be glad they ONLY searched your email!
They can be upset and outraged all they want, but they dodged a bullet they didn't even know about. That kind of thing happens in life more than you'd care to admit.
Come on Harvard, they should know your boss can revoke his word any time he feels like... Their Business school and Law school wrote the BOOK quite literally on allowing this kind of thing.
Ultimately, it was Harvard-owned email boxes, Harvard is their boss. The matter was involving academic cheating, that's a crime worse than murder. and if professors were aware of it DIRECTLY affects the credibility of the entire institution.
So yes, it was a completely justified response when expelling 60 students to review the professors as well.
Try to buy a non-MS machine at any retail store other than Apple..... Yup... That's called MONOPOPLY . Microsoft's position is more absolute than when the Feds broke up Standard Oil or Ma Bell.
When I go to Newegg and punch up Desktop Operating Systems the ONLY results are MICROSOFT.
The petrol industry pays for their OWN upgrades... What Chavez did was increase the amount of rent the country charged to pump its oil... So the private industry retaliates by dragging their feet causing delays.
Remember said industry tried to violate the laws of the country and depose him... They FAILED, do he has no reason to play fair and not convert his country to be as anti-budiness as possible.
Slashdot Mirror
Some games like Angrt Birds make more money from the Ad version than the paid version. Simply because people are playing them all the time and after 40+ hours the ads are worth more. That's why you see some apps without pay versions at all, particularly in Android where prices are "too low" already then they don't have to compete with cracked pay versions..
But there are people that would "program" the town "idiot" to do something terrible , like say plant a bunch of bags containing bombs.
Is a mentally handicap person capable of understanding that the heavy bags were bombs? Or just that somebody gave them cookies to carry stuff around town as "birthday presents".
That's the true insanity defense. The court tolerates it because much of the time a person was directed by someone else.. Or they really had a psychotic episode.
He went into a crowded theatre and shot at 100+ unarmed people...,
Normal people don't do that every day?
The third one is WORST. it proves INTENT and CONTROL of himself. A home full of weapons BOOBY-TRAPPED so the police couldn't enter after arresting him clearly points to pre-intention to commit the crime. He left details about the crime at the house.. Then committed said crime with guns and ammo from that cache.
Is that part of a larger "Joker fantasy"? But he clearly INTENDED to committ the crimes when he left his house with traps and an armload of guns.
They have him at the scene with a fired weapon arrested by the police. Guilty for one, guilty for them all... If there's anybody else to catch?
They don't NEED evidence except to justify 55 consecutive life sentences... So that he NEVER gets paroled.
The judge is almost going to go for it... But he is making the EXPECTATION that as part of therapy, the court will expect DETAILED accounts of what happened... And there will be so much information gathered the shooter will NEVER be able to prove he "won't ever" do it again. Therefore stay locked up. If the state doesn't have the death penalty one place is as good as another.
What the Judge is promising is that these tests will be through so that in 5 or 10 years NOBODY feels sorry for this guy or can claim "he's cured".
The serum is to verify EVENTS not sanity. Once he declares "insane" he goes to being a ward of the state and he cannot be CONVICTED of crimes.
As a ward of the state he can be physically compelled to give evidence or have test done to ensure truthiness. That evidence WILL be used to show he methodically planned and hid his actions... So it will keep him locked up ... Forever. But that's not CRIMINAL evidence, that is phychiatric evidence used for the CIVIL determination he is unsafe.
Also, this wil allow the court to know if anybody else was involved or contributing as this guy will be immune from prosecution.
Once you declare "insanity" you are safe from prosecution.... BUT you're a permant ward of the State until they feel you are safe to release. As a "ward" you are treated like a child in that you cannot legally "lie" because you are handicap..., but that doesn't mean the court cannot order therapy to attempt to see through the psychosis.
I think this is a slightly veiled threat that if he chooses the "insanity" defense he is going to be treated like a dumb, violent animal... Forever. After the judge starts the process, you can't undo your declaration, ever.
But it's stick with Manning. He was basically IT like most of us. IT staff see and hear people PLAN to violate contracts or the law, or just plain be dicks a lot more than most people. But at the point you dump your bosses email box and hand it to the press, you better have a really good reason. We all miss that what he did was a MASSIVE breach of trust that would get ANY of US fired just for discussing on the job.
Does the public DESERVE to see that important WAR decisions are made based on grade school playground spats. ABSOLUTELY. Did he violate his employers trust, absolutely as well.
They are slightly shorter than what you call Trees - Redwoods....
People are quite toxic when you shove dead ones shoulder to shoulder hundreds to an acre. The land chosen for graveyards isn't usually the best anyway (to wet, to dry, too rock for crops) so it would become a problem.
How about we say it this way. When I'm in public I expect to be seen by the OTHER PEOPLE who are in public too. They might remember with their minds, bring recording and off-site storage into this and its not the same thing.
Where is the expectation that I have to worry about non-marked recording devices who's OWNERS are not in public for me to see?
Being "in public" does not mean recorded by automatic equipment forever and ever. THAT is the fallacy. How about this, all owners and manufactures of automated recording equipment have to have THEIR google Glass feed available at all times at any camera location! Now we are equal in public.
For instance even at the SuperDish game which is extremely highly surveilled, you STILL expect privacy inside the restroom. Is GOOGLE going to guarantee that with this product?
I think the Europeans have the right QUESTION on their statement "the right to be forgotten."
I understand I am going to be on quicki-mart cameras for security, and ATM machines and the like. The EXPECTATION is that the OWNER of the location has limited funds to keep those longer than needed for security. Because keeping piles of junk is expensive. That's far different than what is starting up to SELL that information to somebody else. That somebody else is not EVER going to remove the data... Google Glass is one of the collection mechanisms... Specifically to capture and store information about EVERYBODY ELSE. And what THEY are going around you.
That's what Google is selling.. Go back ten years and you automatically captured video... Look you were in the bar with people that are famous now because we got their info years later.. Better yet, they were cheating on their second wife before they got divorced from the first.
You will note all the people that OWN. These companies keep technology far away. Microsoft deletes emails after 30 days, Zuckerberg never updates HIS Facebook relationship status, and so on.. They don't trust all this collected information and they claim to OWN it... Why should YOU.
How is this more efficient than Bump? It's an iPhone app that you tap your phones as the cue to send the file (from the queue on your phone) .. No special chips like NFC.
Google Glass doesn't work that way. It it's on, it UPLOADS.
The owner is totally correct, put the devices in your pocket, please. If the owner is really serious, he's going to have to get the copper mesh upgrade when he remodels... Make the whole place a Faraday cage then no signals get out. Problem solved!
Normal whistle blowers have legal protection... When you whistle blow THE LAW that's what you get. They probably will push to execute him. The military doesn't have provisions for whistle blowing against the civilians.. Spreading secrets is treason... Even if when people label their own treason "secret".
He mentions scientific fraud, but when the school is EXPELLING 60 students over ONE incident, they are looking at the "academic death sentence" if they find professors involved in any way.
Having professors involved would be the WORST possible outcome the University would have. They were looking for blood, there is probably a secret organization that would have "suicided" the offending professors... After they were pubically tarted and feathered (Harvard has old traditions) Privacy was the least concern.
The ACCUSATION OF CHEATING at the level of Harvard is a professional "death sentence". Frankly, the accusations by the expelled students were probably cause to look at the professors.
If this went WRONG these Professors would have found out when security locked them out of their offices... And escorted them off campus. This wasn't going through the union, board, require process... This was Academic "Sudden Death". Be glad they ONLY searched your email!
They can be upset and outraged all they want, but they dodged a bullet they didn't even know about. That kind of thing happens in life more than you'd care to admit.
Come on Harvard, they should know your boss can revoke his word any time he feels like... Their Business school and Law school wrote the BOOK quite literally on allowing this kind of thing.
Ultimately, it was Harvard-owned email boxes, Harvard is their boss. The matter was involving academic cheating, that's a crime worse than murder. and if professors were aware of it DIRECTLY affects the credibility of the entire institution.
So yes, it was a completely justified response when expelling 60 students to review the professors as well.
That sounds way more interesting than just driving in a circle!
The money has to come from somewhere. If YOU aren't paying to read the website, then they have to have some form of sponsorship....
Server space and traffic isn't free once you get past the "hobby" size.
Try to buy a non-MS machine at any retail store other than Apple..... Yup... That's called MONOPOPLY . Microsoft's position is more absolute than when the Feds broke up Standard Oil or Ma Bell.
When I go to Newegg and punch up Desktop Operating Systems the ONLY results are MICROSOFT.
That's why you are buried in a steel box, inside a waterproof concrete box... So you don't leech into the soil
The petrol industry pays for their OWN upgrades... What Chavez did was increase the amount of rent the country charged to pump its oil... So the private industry retaliates by dragging their feet causing delays.
Remember said industry tried to violate the laws of the country and depose him... They FAILED, do he has no reason to play fair and not convert his country to be as anti-budiness as possible.
You don't want him "fresh" you want him to slowly turn to jerky rather than totally dried out crispy like King Tut.