How is that different then when Word decides to crash when saving the newest version of your document, and will only save if you select the entire document and then paste it into a new document (after messing with it for 15 minutes?)
They're framing the argument well to be sure. But the fact of the matter is, that technology marches on, and these telcos will do exactly what they've always done, charge more for the high end due to "equipment costs" and allow the low end and it's equipment to get older, and comparatively slower & slower.
They want their pound of flesh from the consumer and they're not about to give that gravy train up.
Gee Sounds Like what I do on my Mac with iChat and files.
I take a file, drag it over to iChat, drop it on the individual I wish to send the file to, he sees the file come up as an icon in his iChat window, clicks it and it downloads onto his desktop.
I'm really unimpressed with this, it's been done before. Granted it wasn't a wireless device, and the platform is different, but not THAT different.
"This frustration I felt has actually pushed me one more step towards switching all of our machines over to Linux. It may not happen tomorrow, but it will happen"
It's not flamebait people, it's actualy how I feel. Other nice/.'s have been attempting to help me solve the problem instead of modding me out of existence.:(
Re:Does this ver. solve the WinXP security "featur
on
Samba 3.0.0 Released
·
· Score: 2, Insightful
Now that's something I haven't seen before.
"unset a 'check profile ownership acls'"
I'll have to look into that.
Thanks!
Re:Does this ver. solve the WinXP security "featur
on
Samba 3.0.0 Released
·
· Score: 1
We did this. It's the reg entry that's in the docs. Every machine that we attempted to connect has it. Thanks for trying though. Originally I found that information here:
Re:Does this ver. solve the WinXP security "featur
on
Samba 3.0.0 Released
·
· Score: 1
Hahahaha.
Nobody said it was a conspiracy. It's not like I was stumbling around in the dark here. I read the docs for Samba, I read the man pages of Samba, I googled for the problem.
It appears to be some DNS-like issue that XP _sometimes_ does, and samba 2.8 didn't support. My bet is that 3.0 probably takes care of this issue, or at least addresses it in the readme or docs.
Re:Does this ver. solve the WinXP security "featur
on
Samba 3.0.0 Released
·
· Score: 1
That's one of the issues. Some boxes didn't have the problem, some boxes did.
I went so far as to fdisk the XP box, reformat and do a complete reinstall just to have the same problem after I reinstalled. All of that while other boxes _just_worked_. BTW, in my setup the Samba box was acting as the PDC for the Wintel boxes.
Oh, and we're talking XP Pro not Home.
Does this ver. solve the WinXP security "features"
on
Samba 3.0.0 Released
·
· Score: 5, Interesting
I was recently banging my head against the wall when attempting to use a Samba share on an XP box that had worked fine on all my Win2K boxes.
Days & days of hacking the config and attempting to get it to work to no avail. Finally I find that it appears that WinXP has some security "features" added into it that break the use of samaba shares.
This frustration I felt has actually pushed me one more step towards switching all of our machines over to Linux. It may not happen tomorrow, but it will happen.
Now the problem with that is that the ICANN has turned from a publicly governed body into a boys club of "industry leaders" who are playing favorites w/ their business partners.
Slashdot Mirror
It's called the Anarchist's Cookbook, google it. Now go start experimenting and blow yourself up.
Adobe completes Macromedia acquisition
Yes, but wouldn't they have to be identified as "The Estate of "?
You can't make a statement like that without citing your sources, and they better be referring to one of the following:
1 - An independent telivision station not owned by a media conglomerate.
2 - An independent radio station not owned by (or owning) a media conglomerate.
3 - An independent newspaper with circulation (no the net and your blog don't count) not owned by a media conglomerate.
I dare say sir, you are full of shit, or being sarcastic.
It's A Trap!
How is that different then when Word decides to crash when saving the newest version of your document, and will only save if you select the entire document and then paste it into a new document (after messing with it for 15 minutes?)
Run for office.
That "Apply Directly to the Forehead" ad is the TV equivalent of a http://www.ytmnd.com/ page.
They're framing the argument well to be sure. But the fact of the matter is, that technology marches on, and these telcos will do exactly what they've always done, charge more for the high end due to "equipment costs" and allow the low end and it's equipment to get older, and comparatively slower & slower.
They want their pound of flesh from the consumer and they're not about to give that gravy train up.
You guys trying to kill Hexus today or what?
Try Supply & Demand.
They're obviously falling down on the supply side, and not meeting his demand.
And why isn't it secured again?
If a hospital network isn't secured, IMO it is GROSS negligence on the part of the IT staff of the hospital.
Mirrors:
www.electoral-vote2.com
What's funny
www.electoral-vote3.com
Is that
www.electoral-vote4.com
This comment can't be posted
www.electoral-vote5.com
because of all the repetition
www.electoral-vote6.com
In the comment
www.electoral-vote7.com
Due to listing all the mirrors
www.electoral-vote8.com
Forgive me if I think this
www.electoral-vote9.com
Is really stupid
Gee Sounds Like what I do on my Mac with iChat and files.
I take a file, drag it over to iChat, drop it on the individual I wish to send the file to, he sees the file come up as an icon in his iChat window, clicks it and it downloads onto his desktop.
I'm really unimpressed with this, it's been done before. Granted it wasn't a wireless device, and the platform is different, but not THAT different.
Holy Crap!
4 /37/i01/html/ma0352328.html
Here's the link to that article you just spoke of:
Phase Behavior and Rheology of SWNTs in Superacids
For those of you suspcious of "blind" links:
http://pubs.acs.org/cgi-bin/sample.cgi/mamobx/200
Lol, sorry, I surf at +2 & didn't see you.
I'm talkin' XP Pro, not Home.
I imagine the flamebait was for:
/.'s have been attempting to help me solve the problem instead of modding me out of existence. :(
"This frustration I felt has actually pushed me one more step towards switching all of our machines over to Linux. It may not happen tomorrow, but it will happen"
It's not flamebait people, it's actualy how I feel. Other nice
Now that's something I haven't seen before.
"unset a 'check profile ownership acls'"
I'll have to look into that.
Thanks!
We did this. It's the reg entry that's in the docs. Every machine that we attempted to connect has it. Thanks for trying though. Originally I found that information here:
The Samba unofficial HOWTO - 5.3. Joining your Samba Domain
Hahahaha.
Nobody said it was a conspiracy. It's not like I was stumbling around in the dark here. I read the docs for Samba, I read the man pages of Samba, I googled for the problem.
It appears to be some DNS-like issue that XP _sometimes_ does, and samba 2.8 didn't support. My bet is that 3.0 probably takes care of this issue, or at least addresses it in the readme or docs.
That's one of the issues. Some boxes didn't have the problem, some boxes did.
I went so far as to fdisk the XP box, reformat and do a complete reinstall just to have the same problem after I reinstalled. All of that while other boxes _just_worked_. BTW, in my setup the Samba box was acting as the PDC for the Wintel boxes.
Oh, and we're talking XP Pro not Home.
I was recently banging my head against the wall when attempting to use a Samba share on an XP box that had worked fine on all my Win2K boxes.
Days & days of hacking the config and attempting to get it to work to no avail. Finally I find that it appears that WinXP has some security "features" added into it that break the use of samaba shares.
This frustration I felt has actually pushed me one more step towards switching all of our machines over to Linux. It may not happen tomorrow, but it will happen.
Now the problem with that is that the ICANN has turned from a publicly governed body into a boys club of "industry leaders" who are playing favorites w/ their business partners.
"Bed Goes up, Bed goes down.
Bed Goes up, Bed goes down. Weeehee!" - Homer Simpson