Slashdot Mirror


ATI Launches Crossfire... Finally

Steve from Hexus writes "After a long wait, ATI's multi-GPU solution - CrossFire - is finally here. Hexus checks out Crossfire using an X850 Crossfire setup, which can be beaten in performance by a single GeForce 7800 GTX in some games. Too little too late, or will R520 based Crossfire prove more fruitful? Hexus also examines how Crossfire works, how easy it is to setup and what its limitations are with current hardware." Looks very interesting - I'd love to get one for review.

171 comments

  1. what's the deal? by HiroProtagonist · · Score: 4, Funny

    You guys trying to kill Hexus today or what?

    --
    --Remove chicken to e-mail
    1. Re:what's the deal? by Grey+Ninja · · Score: 0

      Yeah, I was laughing my ass off pretty good when I saw this story. But I think it's a disgruntled employee myself. Notice that the submitter is Steve from Hexus? And the last Hexus article was submitted by SteveK?

    2. Re:what's the deal? by Chaotic+Spyder · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Indeed if you check the e-mail they show the same name steve.Kerrison@hexus.net and steve@stevekerrison.com.. Redicilous

      he even posts right here ... something is fishy..

      --
      Losers whine about their best, Winners go home to fuck the prom queen
    3. Re:what's the deal? by fragmentate · · Score: 1

      It's all the nvidia folks clammering. A new kind of religious ferver.

      Apparently competition doesn't always encourage technical advancements. This setup is rather a joke. Reminds me of when people got excited about 16 colors, over 4 colors...

      Yay?

    4. Re:what's the deal? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      These guys asked that for it themselves. The two stories posted are submitted by same person with different nicks ("Steve from Hexus" and "SteveK") and belongs to Hexus according to his own admission.

    5. Re:what's the deal? by imroy · · Score: 3, Informative

      Considering that Steve Kerrison from Hexus submitted both stories (but with a difference email address for the previous story) I'd say he's asking for it, literally.

    6. Re:what's the deal? by gorbachev · · Score: 0, Redundant

      Seriously! I haven't even been able to read the power supply review yet due to the load on their website, and now there's another frontpage link to Hexus. grrrr

      --
      In Soviet Russia, I ruled you
    7. Re:what's the deal? by sznupi · · Score: 1

      And I was here, like, waiting few hours to read the PSU article :/

      --
      One that hath name thou can not otter
    8. Re:what's the deal? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was one of those excited about 16 colors. I had a CGA card in my computer, my friend had an EGA. Space Quest was awesome in 16 colors!

  2. wahoo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Crossfire.... remember that board game when we were kids?

    http://www.letsgoretro.com/classic_games_crossfire .html

    1. Re:wahoo by TheViffer · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Sure do. Saddens me that they don't make those Lawn Dart anymore.

      --
      -- Knowing too much can get you killed, but knowing who knows too much can make you rich.
    2. Re:wahoo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Now if you were to combine crossfire with lawn darts, then you'd have an interesting game.

    3. Re:wahoo by Ayanami+Unit+00 · · Score: 1

      yeah, i remember that game. friend shot a marble into my eye. ATI seems to be doing the same.

  3. Oh Boy... by jwilhelm · · Score: 4, Funny

    Happy "Abuse Hexus Day" everyone!

    1. Re:Oh Boy... by ciroknight · · Score: 4, Informative

      (begin karma whoring)
      Coral Cache

      --
      "Victory means exit strategy, and it's important for the President to explain to us what the exit strategy is." G.W.Bush
    2. Re:Oh Boy... by cloudmaster · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I'd imagine they have enough confusion with two people named Steve over there - or one person abusing /. by creating multiple accounts...

    3. Re:Oh Boy... by PetiePooo · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Happy "Abuse Hexus Day" everyone!

      except its really self-abuse. Anyone else notice both Hexus articles were submitted by Steve Kerrison? That's steve.kerrison@HEXUS.net (or steve@stevekerrison.com) from the Hexus staff

      ... guess its one way to drum up advertising revenue.

    4. Re:Oh Boy... by stinerman · · Score: 1

      ... guess its one way to drum up advertising revenue.

      Not when no one can see the fscking page! Then, its a good way to drum up a fire in their server room.

  4. you idiots by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

    the server was already down from the last story and you posted this? now thats 2 useless posts on the front page

  5. Argh! by bassgoonist · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Max res of 1600x1200 at 60hz...how...disapointing.

    --
    You can tell I'm an aries because of my ram.
    1. Re:Argh! by Brain_Recall · · Score: 5, Insightful
      The Inquirer discussed this limitation before. The Crossfire system can do 1920x1200, but only at 52Hz. The SiI 1161 chip on the Crossfire card that merges the two data streams has this bandwidth limitation, and it appears ATi won't be fixing it for awhile.

      Personally, I feel the Crossfire solution has far too many drawbacks for the benifits. Not only do you require a special motherboard, but now you also need a special Crossfire capable video card. The second card can be any card, but the RAM buffer should be the same size, otherwise it will defualt to the lowest value for both cards. The external cable adds some nice external heft to the system, as well.

      So, what do you get over the SLI system? There are added antrisropic filtering methods and increased anti-ailising, but these are already appearing in the latest nVidia drivers. You can use your exisitng card to upgrade to a Crossfire system, but you can already do this with SLI. All in all, the system has it's flaws, too many I think to make it worthwhile.

    2. Re:Argh! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Max res of 1600x1200 at 60hz...how...disap[p]ointing.

      I am glad someone pointed this out. It is ridiculous that a card this expensive (with additional expensive requirements) can't even run the top-of-the-line LCD displays on the market today. Well, maybe at a lower pixelated resolution... but who would accept that after paying all this money?

    3. Re:Argh! by springbox · · Score: 1
      Max res of 1600x1200 at 60hz...how...disapointing.

      Ha. I run everything at 800x600@75Hz on my 15" monitor. It actually works very well for me in most cases and makes everything look warmer IMO. I find it funny how you're whining about the lack of excess.

    4. Re:Argh! by blkmagic · · Score: 1

      Give me a break. Next you'll be talking about us whining about wanting more than 128 MB RAM because swap space does the job. Just because you're not utilizing the capabilities of your technology doesn't mean other people shouldn't.

    5. Re:Argh! by springbox · · Score: 1
      Give me a break. Next you'll be talking about us whining about wanting more than 128 MB RAM because swap space does the job. Just because you're not utilizing the capabilities of your technology doesn't mean other people shouldn't.

      In most cases the excess does little to enhance the overall experience. The 128MB of onboard RAM on my video card seems to be underutilized most of the time. It's silly to complain about a high resolution (1600x1200) being deficient even though there are plenty of other options available that are slightly below that point. Especially for the intended target (games); once you pass a certain point, the excess becomes largely unnoticable.

    6. Re:Argh! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well yeah, if we are talking about playing pong. However, the difference between my home system and my work system is night and day on BF2, Doom3, HL2, etc etc. I enjoy having FSAA, 1280x1024, Bump mapping, etc etc.
      It just makes it seem, warmer.

    7. Re:Argh! by fullofangst · · Score: 1

      Oh, stop your whining and buy a TFT, you CRT-loving dinosaur!

    8. Re:Argh! by Elshar · · Score: 1

      Personally, I feel the Crossfire solution has far too many drawbacks for the benifits. Not only do you require a special motherboard, but now you also need a special Crossfire capable video card. The second card can be any card, but the RAM buffer should be the same size, otherwise it will defualt to the lowest value for both cards. The external cable adds some nice external heft to the system, as well.

      How is that different from SLI? You need to make sure BOTH cards are SLI-capable, AND you need an SLI-capable MB otherwise, guess what? No SLI.

      Otherwise you seem to be on the right track. :P

    9. Re:Argh! by William-Ely · · Score: 1

      I also heard that the pixel pipelines would also be disabled to match that of the secondary video card. So if your Crossfire card has 16 pipes and the second one only has 12 then the master card will disable four of it's pipes. I don't remember where I read that but it was on the internet so it must be true :)

      --
      Mod me down with all of your hatred, and your journey towards the dark side will be complete!
    10. Re:Argh! by Brain_Recall · · Score: 1
      Quite true. But how many PCI Express nVidia cards anymore DON'T support SLI? My point is, if you purchase a nVidia solution, you will require a SLI motherboard. Buy any middle-to-upper end nVidia card and it will support SLI. That means the other card is a drop-in solution.

      This isn't true with ATi. You can buy a Crossfire motherboard and you can buy any middle-to-upper range ATi card without problem. If you want to use Crossfire, you have to purchase a specifically built Crossfire video card (which would cost more than a standard video card, for various marketing reasons).

      ATi's system simply is more restrictive. ATi won't be making every video card they have Crossfire capable, since this would me more expensive than the plain-jane setup (that extra chip adds more than you think).

      If I were to be ATi, I would have designed a new incompatable system (the limited compatability is practically the only benifit of Crossfire). I would have desinged the motherboard so that each PCI-E slot was selectably 15x or 16x wide. In Crossfire mode (that would be enabled by the BIOS, not by some stupid jumper-block setup), both video cards would run at 15x, and the remaining channel would be tunneled between each video card. (This is, of course, assuming that only one PCI-E lane would be needed. It surely could be expanded.) The next product cycle, I would make everone of my PCI-E cards Crossfire enabled, and crack-down on the specs so that even differnt generation/manufacture cards would work (Inter-manufacture would be far easier than inter-generation compatability, this I will admitt.)

      What benifits would there be? For one, an external cable between video cards has been completely eliminated. A drop-in soultion would be gaurnteed without need for an extra product. It's clean, simple, elegant, and expandable (as more channels could be eaten up for inter-card bandwidth. PCI-E 16x has WAY more bandwidth than the cards need.)

      But, this is dream land, and such things didn't happen.

      PS: I love ATi. I was a first-adopter of the Radeon 9700 Pro. They messed up with Crossfire, methinks.

  6. yeah, we'd all want to read that review.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah, we'd all want to read that review; just like your "review" of the Monarch computer from a few days ago. I'm sure ATI would love one of those too.

  7. Look who submitted it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hexus is hardly a victim here if they submitted their own article.

    1. Re:Look who submitted it by gorbachev · · Score: 1

      Maybe they're conducting load balancing testing :)

      --
      In Soviet Russia, I ruled you
    2. Re:Look who submitted it by mwilli · · Score: 1

      If they are, they're failing miserably.

      --
      My sig beat up your sig.
  8. Hexus gone by cbc1920 · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Maybe it wasn't the best idea to link 2 Hexus articles in a matter of hours... I doubt anyone will read this article until tomorrow.

    first post!?

  9. Linux support by digitalderbs · · Score: 5, Funny

    Great! Now we'll only have to wait about two years for mediocre linux support.

    1. Re:Linux support by loonicks · · Score: 1

      Unlikely considering ATI cards only support 24-bit floating point.

    2. Re:Linux support by loonicks · · Score: 1

      Oh, you mean linux DRIVERS. Yeah... still unlikely :-)

    3. Re:Linux support by LordHatrus · · Score: 1

      ha! But in all seriousness, ATI has gotten much better as of late with their linux drivers, and now even a complete newbie can install them, which is quite a plus, considering most slashdotters would care to see the rise of linux on the home/newbie front.

  10. ./ editors must really hate Hexus by hrieke · · Score: 0, Redundant

    I can't think of any other reason why they'd link two front page stories in one day to them.
    That sound you hear is their servers melting under the stress.

    --
    III.IIVIVIXIIVIVIIIVVIIIIXVIIIXIIIIIIIIVIIIIVVIIIV IIVIIIIIIVIII...
    1. Re:./ editors must really hate Hexus by bassgoonist · · Score: 1

      ./ ? I think there's something wrong there :-p

      --
      You can tell I'm an aries because of my ram.
    2. Re:./ editors must really hate Hexus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perhaps if you cared to check the submitter, It's buddy from hexus. I'm sure he doesn't mind the massive traffic, probably just paid his monthly bill.

  11. ATI had better watch out... by LegendOfLink · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...for Jon Stewart. Folks say that man has been known to cease CrossFires that are just full of hot air. ATI had better deliver.

    1. Re:ATI had better watch out... by geenome · · Score: 1

      ...and ATi launches Crossfire, which is a nuanced multi-GPU solution that is named after the stray bullets that hit innocent bystanders in a gang fight.

      --
      I have discovered a truly marvelous demonstration of this post that this sig is too narrow to contain.
  12. /. Readers Must Not Know How To Read by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just who is this evil "Steve from Hexus" guy and why does he hate Hexus so much?

  13. Coral Cache by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative
    1. Re:Coral Cache by unts · · Score: 0, Redundant

      We salute you.

  14. Dammit by MatD · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Why, why, why, can't the editors change the links to use coralcache ? It's retarded that every story on slashdot concerns an article that no one can read. Is it really any wonder that people post without RTFA?

    --
    Since when did operating systems become a religion?
    1. Re:Dammit by aicrules · · Score: 1

      Maybe because a huge percentage of the people who visit the site do so during work hours. And a huge percentage of those people are working for companies that block everything but port 80.

    2. Re:Dammit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Huge precentage? Cite your source.

      If you can't visit a website because it has been DDoSed by Slashdot readers, what does it matter if its on port 80?

    3. Re:Dammit by Bronz · · Score: 5, Insightful

      It might be that part of the /. revenue stream is selling subscriptions to people who want to read stories before the servers melt. I'm not saying that's bad, I'm just saying it might partly answer your question.

    4. Re:Dammit by JoshRosenbaum · · Score: 1

      If they started doing this, I'm pretty sure they'd piss off just as many people as they'd make happy. Lots of people make money from hits on their sites, and may be able to use the "numbers" when negotiating for better ad deals. Caching is great, but the content provider loses some control, and lots of providers may not like that.

    5. Re:Dammit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative
    6. Re:Dammit by festers · · Score: 1

      Because a large part of their viewership is only able to view website that come across over port 80. Many, many corporate firewalls block ports like 8090, my firewall included.

      --


      -------
      "Every artist is a cannibal, every poet is a thief."
  15. Links to other reviews by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative
    1. Re:Links to other reviews by Wookie+Monster · · Score: 1

      Clicking on the techreport link causes Firefox 1.0.7 to crash every time on my machine.

    2. Re:Links to other reviews by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's because you use Firefox, you queer. No problems on IE, of course!

    3. Re:Links to other reviews by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Turn off your ad blockers and try again.

    4. Re:Links to other reviews by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You put the Tech Report link next to Tom's Hardware? How dare you. How dare you.
      At least you put it higher.

    5. Re:Links to other reviews by Zebra_X · · Score: 1

      Bit tech doesn't seem to have done their homework. Their numbers are really out of whack in comparison to everyone else.

    6. Re:Links to other reviews by fullofangst · · Score: 1

      The Toms Hardware review is particularly disappointing.

      1) They benchmark X850's against 7800's. Well that's fine, but they are a newer generation. Why not compare them against 2 x 6800 Ultra's ?
      2) They don't include single card scores so you can't tell just what sort of increase you are actually getting.
      3) The 3Dmark 'image quality' example pictures are a joke - they take a frame from 3Dmark from ATI and then from Nvidia, but they are different frames. You can specify which frame you want in the app, why didn't they take the same frame? Would have made for much easier a comparison. Sigh.

  16. ExtremeTech's Review by ThinSkin · · Score: 4, Informative
    Under the hood, performance, compatability issues, SLI differences.....

    http://www.extremetech.com/article2/0,1697,1862962 ,00.asp

  17. MGP by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 4, Interesting
    --

    --
    make install -not war

    1. Re:MGP by oliverthered · · Score: 1

      It is possible to run some processing tasks on the GPU, something like a matrix inversion should be fairly quick, but general purpose apps aren't really viable due to the time/bandwidth it takes working between the GPU and CPU.

      --
      thank God the internet isn't a human right.
    2. Re:MGP by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      Er, did you click the link? That's an extensive website representing some of the General Purpose GPU work delivering apps right now. According to your feasibility criteria, general purpose Internet apps aren't possible due to client/server latency. Yet you're reading this message.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    3. Re:MGP by oliverthered · · Score: 1

      Internet apps have ridiculous latency, To me general perpose apps are things like windows or linux with real time interaction as well as bulk vector processing or high latency network applications. The GPU is fine for general processing so long as it doesn't have to have low latency. e.g. sound processing where you know what your going to get a half a second in advance could be done on the GPU without thrashing you system, but real time sound processing would be difficult, that's why I say it's not really general purpose, in the sense that a CPU is.

      --
      thank God the internet isn't a human right.
  18. No Linux drivers yet. by paulwallen · · Score: 2, Funny

    I just checked ati.com :)

  19. Don't get caught up by fuelvolts · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Crossfire....you'll get caught up in the....Crossfire, crossfire, CROSSFIRE!
    Too bad for ATI, I will not get caught up the crossfire - I'll keep my SLI for now.

    /obscure?

    1. Re:Don't get caught up by stinerman · · Score: 1

      I agree with the sibling who thought it was the worst game ever, but I'll thank you for drudging up memories from my youth of that song.

      I recall wanting the game for a really long time and never getting it. A friend got it, and I played it a few times. It wasn't nearly as fun as the kid screaming "Yeah!" on the commercial made it seem.

    2. Re:Don't get caught up by instarx · · Score: 1

      Whever moded this as "redundant" has a viscious and delightful sense of humor.

  20. Resolution issues by jurt1235 · · Score: 1

    Yes, with the bigger displays getting cheaper by the day, a higher resolution than 1600x1200 at 60Hz would really be preferable. At least run it at 100Hz. 60Hz really strains your eyes.

    --

    My wife's sketchblog Blob[p]: Gastrono-me
    1. Re:Resolution issues by ivan256 · · Score: 2, Informative

      60Hz is essentially the maximum you can achieve over DVI-D at 1600x1200.

    2. Re:Resolution issues by prefect42 · · Score: 3, Informative

      Take a peek at high end nVidia cards, and it's a different story. Dual-link DVI with both ports combined you can push it to 3840x2400. I believe that to be at 60Hz, but don't quote me. We've got a FX3000 running at that at 15Hz.

      --

      jh

    3. Re:Resolution issues by ivan256 · · Score: 1

      That sounds like the same story to me. Over a single DVI-D link, you can only push enough pixels to get 60Hz at 1600x1200. It has nothing to do with the card, it's the interconnect. If you want faster, you have to go to dual-link.

    4. Re:Resolution issues by prefect42 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Either dual-link or more literally as I mentioned we were doing: two connectors. They could just use both connectors from the non-Crossfire card to connect to the Crossfire card, giving you 1920x1200@100Hz.

      --

      jh

    5. Re:Resolution issues by rsmith-mac · · Score: 1

      Most non-Crossfire cards have 1 DVI and 1 VGA connector - ATI hasn't forced OEMs to provide dual-DVI connectors on their boards, so most haven't.

    6. Re:Resolution issues by Mike+McTernan · · Score: 2, Informative

      I don't know why monitors don't just double scan things to reduce the flicker to make it bearable to view. I'd be happy with a 50Hz screen refresh if the monitor was displaying it at 100Hz, heck, when I'm not gaming a 25Hz refresh would probably be good enough if quadrupled in the monitor.

      I think cinemas do something similar where each frame is displayed twice such that the flicker is less noticable while the frame rate remains the same. Maybe it's more expensive/difficult for a CRT.

      --
      -- Mike
    7. Re:Resolution issues by hawkbug · · Score: 1

      I have a question though - is this true with LCD monitors as well? Every LCD monitor I have defaults to 60Hz so I leave it. I obviously always adjust my CRT displays, but I can't tell a difference with LCD.

    8. Re:Resolution issues by PIBM · · Score: 1

      most cinemas don't have a digital video setup : thus you see the whole frame the whole time as it's a film roll with a light behind...

    9. Re:Resolution issues by Naikrovek · · Score: 1

      LCDs look the same at 60Hz or 120Hz because LCD pixels have such a huge persistence of state. it takes a while for an LCD pixel to revert to neutral, but it takes almost no time for a CRT pixel. phosphorus stops glowing relatively quickly.

    10. Re:Resolution issues by Afrosheen · · Score: 1

      There's a gigantic difference between how each display actually 'displays' an image.

        In a CRT, Cathode Ray Tube, you have a phosphorescent screen that gets lit up by a ray gun. The gun is in the back of the monitor and fires forward, one line at a time (which is why larger monitors are generally much deeper in size, the gun has to be further back to paint the whole screen). Refresh rate is basically how fast this ray gun can draw lines across your screen in sequential order. Better refresh rates (75hz and up) look more solid and less flickery and are therefore easier on your eyes.

        Now, in an LCD, you have layers of crystals which act as gates between colored layers of plastic. The 'dead pixel' syndrom happens when every layer of this grid gets locked to 'on' or 'off' in one point. The LCD has a few backlights and a diffusion layer to scatter the light so it shines evenly on the display. It's when all the gates on every layer are open that you get a white pixel (i.e. you're seeing the backlight directly) and when they're all off you see a black pixel (no light is coming through any layer).

        These are extremely simplistic definitions but it should give you some idea of the difference. A much more interesting explanation is given here: howstuffworks/lcd.

    11. Re:Resolution issues by ivan256 · · Score: 1

      Digital projectors these days are generally LCD or DLP, which don't scan the frame either.

    12. Re:Resolution issues by default+luser · · Score: 3, Informative

      No. LCD pixels aren't just "more persistent" than CRT pixels.

      LCD pixels hold their current state until the input signal changes. There is no scan period on an LCD, the 60Hz signal is simply a convenient way to bridge the gap between raster scan displays and active-matrix displays.

      So, if you send an LCD a set of successive white screens, after the initial white screen no pixels will change, ever. A CRT, on the other hand, will write a white pixel to every part of the screen once every 1/60th of a second...and while the beam is not concentrated on a particular pixel, its brightness will fade.

      It has nothing to do with LCDs' slower reponse time, as you implied.

      --

      Man is the animal that laughs.
      And occasionally whores for Karma.

    13. Re:Resolution issues by ianpatt · · Score: 1

      It's a good idea, but it would require something like an internal framebuffer inside the monitor, and delaying the video by at least a half of a frame. CRTs are mostly analog and very simple, so it would need a substantial amount of new hardware to implement.

      On the other hand, this means you could put all of this hardware in a seperate box outside the monitor and use it with any video source and any monitor (assuming you put enough memory and fast enough RAMDACs in the box). Sounds like an interesting project.

    14. Re:Resolution issues by sznupi · · Score: 1

      As always: price. They simply do what's cheaper...how do you think, why only expensive monitors give high frequencies at high resolutions?

      --
      One that hath name thou can not otter
    15. Re:Resolution issues by Naikrovek · · Score: 1

      I did not say that LCDs have a slower response. I said that it takes them a long time to go neutral after being told what color to be.

      pick up your game boy, turn it on, and when a screen shows up, turn it off. the image does not stay there forever, it slowly goes away.

      that effect is what i was describing.

  21. And what you really need by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful
  22. Re:Hexus reports on Linux by coop0030 · · Score: 1

    Dude, you post this ridiculous mess of a message every time a linux story is submitted.

    Note to author:

    Please get a grip man, and enter a neat place called reality.

    Thank you.

  23. Compared to NVidia's Offering by PIPBoy3000 · · Score: 5, Informative

    NVidia currently has a couple SLI cards, which perform quite well. I recently picked up a 7800 GT, the low-end of the high-end cards, for around $350. The plan is to pick up a second one when the price drops to around $100. It's very reminiscent of my Voodoo 2 experience - the first cost $300 and the second cost $30.

    Of course, Crossfire has the benefit of working with any other ATI card past a certain point. With NVidia's offerings, you have to match the card exactly (though supposedly the manufacturer doesn't matter). For my needs, it doesn't matter all that much, but it's something to consider.

    Not that I'm a fanboy of either vendor. My last card was a Radeon 9800 Pro, which has worked great these last couple years. Now it seems that NVidia has the card that works best for my needs. Ain't competition grand?

    1. Re:Compared to NVidia's Offering by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The next driver update is said to mean that you can mix and match (not to mention include sli support for linux, which is something I'd expect from ATI sometime around December... 2009)

    2. Re:Compared to NVidia's Offering by UnrefinedLayman · · Score: 4, Insightful
      The plan is to pick up a second one when the price drops to around $100.
      By the time you pick up a second one for $100 you're going to be a long, long way behind the curve. The GeForce 6800 GT (the previous generation equivalent of your card), released in June of 2004, still retails for $260-$280. Even the vanilla 6800s are ~$175. I would be surprised if you could buy a 9800 Pro for $100.

      SLI is a neat idea if the performance increase is tangible, but considering a single 7800 GTX can outperform an SLI setup of 6800 Ultras in many cases after only one year since the previous generation's release... by the time a 7800 GT is $100, it won't be worth $100 (much like all $100 video cards).
    3. Re:Compared to NVidia's Offering by PIPBoy3000 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Like most things, it'll depend on issues such as cost, performance, and the timing of where I am in the upgrade process. Adding a second Voodoo 2 for $30 was great, as that's basically pocket change. Of course, by that time the computer was my secondary computer anyway. The boost in performance was nice, but not critical.

      I typically have two gaming computers at any one time. It doesn't have to be top-notch, but it's handy if it has reasonably good performance. When it stutters or is slow, my son makes me play on it and takes the fast one for himself.

    4. Re:Compared to NVidia's Offering by freidog · · Score: 1

      The plan is to pick up a second one when the price drops to around $100.

      This is sorf of the flaw in a lot of people's SLI plans. (Because Crossfire can use 1 non-crossfire compatible card ATI's solution might not be quite as bad.
      A 6800 GT is still about $275-300 right now, the 6800 Ultra is $350 and up.
      You can't hardly buy a 5900/U/5950 anymore.

      If you don't mind going to ebay or second hand cards for your second one you can probably save a decent amount of money on the second card, of course you already spent a bit of money up front for an SLI motherboard and a PSU to handle a second card. It might end up being about cost effective if you can scrounge up a second card on the cheap in a year or two,
      but the 'I'll just pick up a second card when they're cheap' really isn't going to materialize unless Nvidia and ATI change their attidude towards older generations, keeping old chips like the 9800 or 5700 in production and at value prices has been the exception, not the rule. Especially for Nvidia.

    5. Re:Compared to NVidia's Offering by javilon · · Score: 1

      Just curiosity, what do you need this big ass cards for? I can't think of anything except proffesional gaming.

      --


      When his defense asked, "Which computer has Jon Johansen trespassed upon?" the answer was: "His own."
  24. Drivers... by juiceCake · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I recently took the plunge and went back to ATI after hearing their drivers had much improved. After far too many VPU errors I ditched them again and went back to nVidia. Is it just me that has these problems? I wonder if the same driver issues will come up in the SLI cards.

    1. Re:Drivers... by isbhod · · Score: 1

      i don't know about anyone else, but my AIW card had VPU errors left and right, so i went to a ATI9700 and it ran rather nice for a while and then for no reason one day all 3D functionality became extremely crippled. i tried everything, re-seating the card, hell i even dumped the hard drive and reinstalled windows, i gave up and found a GeForce 6800 128MB card on newegg for 168.00 and the rive tuner can unlock the extra pipes and vertex shaders to make it run like the GT version which sells for 230.00 on new egg. ATI may have the fastest and greatest benchmarks, but i assume to achieve these you have to run on the exact same hardware that they use in their labs. but hey this is just my personal experience and opinion i am by no means an industry expert.

  25. A slight bit of promise by Namronorman · · Score: 4, Informative

    It sounds like, even though Crossfire might not be the glorious thing everyone has been waiting for, that in the future it might prove better than SLI. I for one though, feel that it would be better to just wait for that one graphics card than to get two at the moment, considering how fast they become obsolete.

    Anyways, from what I've read and been told, SLI requires special profiles to be taken advantage of in games, while crossfire simulates 1 graphics card and doesn't require anything but the default drivers to be taken advantage of.

    --
    $fortune
    Tomorrow has been canceled due to lack of interest.
    1. Re:A slight bit of promise by Thalagyrt · · Score: 1

      About the SLI profiles, anyone can create an SLI profile for a game if they want to, it just takes a bit of research beforehand. Have a look here. It should work for pretty much anything, but it takes a bit of tweaking.

      --
      Buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo!
  26. Poor research / lack of knowledge by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    Page 2 :

    "By definition, a single-link DVI connection only has enough bandwidth at its maximum clock rate to carry a 1600x1200 image at up to 60Hz, or a 1900x1200 image displayed at 54Hz. Therefore in terms of what the slave can send the master board for output via the compositing chip, it's limited to those resolutions."

    Limited only if you read the original DVI spec. How does he think people run the HP and Apple 23" displays and the Dell 24" display over a single-link connection?

    All card manufacturers, and 1920x1200 display manufacturers, allow you to run the channel with a reduced blanking interval, and so squeeze in the extra bandwidth needed for 1920x1200x60.

    Bad start to the review - I'm not going to continue reading (even if I could after it has been slashdot'ed.

    1. Re:Poor research / lack of knowledge by Slashcrap · · Score: 1

      Limited only if you read the original DVI spec. How does he think people run the HP and Apple 23" displays and the Dell 24" display over a single-link connection?

      The trouble is that the max resolution of the Crossfire solution isn't limited by the single DVI link - it's limited by the max bandwith that the compositing chip can deal with.

      So they were wrong to identify DVI as the source of the problem. And you have further muddied the waters by ranting about dual DVI as the solution. Hope this helps.

    2. Re:Poor research / lack of knowledge by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can confirm that this weekend I hooked up my dell 24" lcd to a laptop with an nvidia 6800 in it. I run at 1920x1200 at 60hz over single dvi connect.

    3. Re:Poor research / lack of knowledge by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As far as I'm aware, only Apple's 30" Cinema Display requires dual-link DVI.

    4. Re:Poor research / lack of knowledge by aquabat · · Score: 1
      He's not saying the answer is dual DVI. He's saying that single DVI has the bandwidth to drive 1920x1200@60, if you reduce the horizontal and vertical blanking intervals. He's right.

      The maximum bandwidth for single DVI is 165 MHz, IIRC. You can slice that bandwidth up any way you like. Depending on the horizontal resolution, vertical resolution, horizontal blanking interval and vertical blanking interval, you can get a lot of different geometries and refresh rates.

      I had to do this for my ViewSonic VP201s, because it can't handle the VESA standard 1600x1200@60 timings, without losing sync. To work around this, I wrote my own 1600x1200@60 modeline, which causes the output bandwidth to be 153 MHz. Works like a charm.

      That being said, yeah it's the compositing chip that is the bottleneck here.

      --
      A republic cannot succeed till it contains a certain body of men imbued with the principles of justice and honour.
  27. Re:Hexus reports on Linux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Your idea of reality is this magical place where no one ever disagrees with the Slashbot groupthink. Sieg Heil!

  28. Sounds cool, by hungrygrue · · Score: 2, Interesting

    but where are the Linux drivers? Doesn't matter how awesome the card is if we have to wait two years for drivers.

    1. Re:Sounds cool, by Professor_UNIX · · Score: 0, Troll
      but where are the Linux drivers? Doesn't matter how awesome the card is if we have to wait two years for drivers.

      Why would a Linux user need a 3D graphics card? This kind of card is for people that play video games on Windows.

    2. Re:Sounds cool, by Ford+Prefect · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Why would a Linux user need a 3D graphics card?

      You do realise a significant proportion of high-end CAD and film animation is done using Linux workstations?

      They've kind of pushed out the old SGI boxes in that they're (a) considerably cheaper, and (b) considerably faster. Have a random example from Google...

      --
      Tedious Bloggy Stuff - hooray?
    3. Re:Sounds cool, by hungrygrue · · Score: 1

      Not to mention the fact that he answered his own question already. He was just being a troll and implying that there are no games for Linux.

    4. Re:Sounds cool, by hungrygrue · · Score: 0, Flamebait
      Dear Moderator: If you wish to assign inexplicable tags like "redundant" to posts like this, perhaps you would care to post a reply explaining your logic. I'm sure we would all find it fascinating. Since you clearly have no idea what the word "redundant" means, I'll help you out:
      1. Exceeding what is necessary or natural; superfluous.
      2. Needlessly wordy or repetitive in expression: a student paper filled with redundant phrases.
      3. Of or relating to linguistic redundancy.
      4. Chiefly British. Dismissed or laid off from work, as for being no longer needed.
      5. Electronics. Of or involving redundancy in electronic equipment.
      6. Of or involving redundancy in the transmission of messages.
      I wonder if, perhaps, the "Linux is not user friendly" troll just got mod points?
    5. Re:Sounds cool, by Alioth · · Score: 1

      People play 3D games on Linux too. They even write them (points at sig).
      I think I'll be sticking with nVidia. At least they make an attempt at supporting Linux users.

    6. Re:Sounds cool, by Tim+C · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Why would a Linux user need a 3D graphics card? This kind of card is for people that play video games on Windows.

      Actually, a 3d card is for anyone who wants to perform 3d vector operations at a decent rate. The most obvious application of that is 3d graphics, but even that doesn't limit you just to playing games.

      You might as well ask why a Linux user would want sound, or high resolution displays, or a GUI...

    7. Re:Sounds cool, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      He was just being a troll and implying that there are no games for Linux.

      I'm not implying it, I'm flat out stating that this kind of card is aimed at Windows users, not the couple thousand Linux gamers out there. Why do you think ATI never bothers to release drivers for other platforms? They couldn't care less about the tiny Linux market. Let's be honest now, if there were a lot of Linux gamers then we'd have more than 2 dozen commercial video games available natively. Then there are the people who just use the Transgaming WINE stuff and like to pretend they're Linux users even though they're running Windows games and inflating Windows gaming numbers. You might as well use Windows XP guys because the tally goes in the Windows column when you buy that game.

  29. Steve K from Hexus should stop spamming Slashdot by devilsammo · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Steve K, I've never heard of you or hexus today, but please stop spamming slashdot to push up your unique visitors for your ads. It's lame. If your articles are any good, rest assured someone else will submit them. kthxbye.

  30. Re:Hexus reports on Linux by hungrygrue · · Score: 1

    Who the hell is this jerk? Why can't he come up with something new or at least factually correct? I mean come the hell on, I don't understand the whole troll mentality to begin with, but surely it would be more fun to come up with something creative and new to piss people off with, wouldn't it? At least some of the GNAA posts have been kindof funny.

  31. Stop picking on Hexus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They actually do original quality articles, unlike Roland Piquepaille who just merely steals articles and re-summarizes them.

  32. Resolution / Refresh Rate Limit by LTC_Kilgore · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I feel that crossfire's biggest flaw is that there is a resolution limit at 1600x1200 @ 60Hz with crossfire enabld.

    The customers who ATI developed this product for (the most rabid and devout hardware addicts with large budgets) most likely have either large CRTs (FW900) or high resolution widescreen LCD's (2405FPW, etc).

    The failure to recognize that these customers would want to run games at their display's native resolution is unexcusable.

    Seriously, why elso would someone drop $1000 to upgrade their graphics hardware if it wasn't so they could run the latest games at high resolution with full detail settings.

    1. Re:Resolution / Refresh Rate Limit by gl4ss · · Score: 2, Insightful

      it doesn't matter that much. not many people are going to buy a crossfire system anyways.

      why? because it sucks ;). that's also why it didn't matter that they didn't get it to market that fast - nobody would have needed it, only reason ati even has it is for PR and feature list.

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    2. Re:Resolution / Refresh Rate Limit by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 1

      If ATI really didn't put dual link DVI in the SLI card, then I'm disappointed.

      I'm a bit disappointed with the DVI standard though, I have a 9600-something attached to a 21" CRT, and that combination can run 2048x1536@80Hz over the analog connections. I do get a bit flicker weary though, so I don't stay in that mode for long.

    3. Re:Resolution / Refresh Rate Limit by jandrese · · Score: 1

      You're bothered by the flicker of a monitor running at 80Hz? That's near the top of what a lot of middle-of-the-road monitors can handle at common resolutions (1280x1024). Ceratinly you don't notice a big difference between 80Hz and 85Hz.

      --

      I read the internet for the articles.
    4. Re:Resolution / Refresh Rate Limit by KitesWorld · · Score: 1

      Bah. I have troubles if mines set to anything below 100. :| (VMPro 454, btw)

    5. Re:Resolution / Refresh Rate Limit by default+luser · · Score: 1

      That's weird, I'm VERY concious of the refresh rate (can tell the difference between 60, 72, 75, 85 easily), but even I have to admit that 85Hz is plenty fast enough on any decent CRT.

      Oh well, at least your monitor was born to run at such high speeds (also a proud 454 owner).

      --

      Man is the animal that laughs.
      And occasionally whores for Karma.

  33. The Point of Crossfire? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    Looks very interesting - I'd love to get one for review.

    Just one?

  34. Hexus must be happy with /.! by maskedavenger · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Two stories on here both from Hexus. Haha. What was the poster thinking?! He wanted hits but now the site is down!

    Crossfire will never work because who would buy a slave card... If you're primary card fails, you're out 2 cards! Ain't that some stuff!

    Oh, and I was an ATI man myself for years. Started before Radeon, now I have a 7800GT and I will never go back... unless they offer me some kind of deal, and buy SLI rights.

    --
    Who is that masked man?
    1. Re:Hexus must be happy with /.! by wild_berry · · Score: 1

      If you can get to the Coral Cache, read the fine article (and this is the printable single-screen version) and see that the master-slave relationship puts an existing ATi card into 'slave' position. The Crossfire 'Master' card has an FPGA to unite the output of the Crossfire card and its slave. Then read about how the Crossfire features can be switched on and off without restarting your computer.

      Hexus rate Crossfire as a preferable method to link two cards than nVidia's SLI. However, the present execution of the system (like many ATi things) requires the kinks taken out first.

  35. Looks interesting indeed... by seanvaandering · · Score: 1

    Looks very interesting - I'd love to get one for review.

    More like...

    This article looks very interesting - I'd love to see the review.

  36. Meh... by ivan256 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Who cares about this stuff other than the tiny portion of the population that will ever use it?

    The whole point of this SLI stuff is marketing. It convinces people to buy a more expensive video card than they otherwise would have so that they can fool themselves into thinking they'll get a huge performance boost a few years down the line when they add a second card on the cheap.

    In reality, when the second card comes down in price, the SLI configuration will be outclassed on the same order of magnitude as the single card alone by the latest stuff, and you'll just end up having to buy a whole new expensive card, or living with slow graphics.

    So unless you've got a boatload of cash and are going to buy two top of the line cards *right now*, it really doesn't matter if either of these manufacturers SLI technology is any good. It's just a marketing gimmick.

    1. Re:Meh... by Matimus · · Score: 2, Informative

      SLI works well for game developers who are writing for next generation hardware. While I agree that there is a lot of gimmicky marketing involved, I think it is a good attempt to raise the bar on what it means to be 'High End' as a response to market demand. Maybe some people do what you suggest, but I know a handfull of people who bought two cards right off the bat. As long as people are willing to spend the money, you can't blame nVidia or ATI for giving them more opportunities to do just that. Also, I don't know what you are suggesting by saying that it convinces people to buy a more expensive video card. All of nVidia's PCIe cards in the 6000 and 7000 generation support SLI (even the non-GT ones that don't have a bridge) since the 77 drivers came out (at the 7800 launch). That includes the cheap ones (if you can call any of those cards cheap).

      --
      GENERATION 25: The first time you see this, copy it into your sig on any forum and add 1 to the generation. Social exper
    2. Re:Meh... by ivan256 · · Score: 1

      SLI works well for game developers who are writing for next generation hardware.

      Are you saying this from experience, or are you guessing? This doesn't seem accurate to me, since next generation hardware has additional features to go with the additional performance.

    3. Re:Meh... by Matimus · · Score: 1

      Works well != Works perfectly. Although I don't have game development experience personally, I have heard from the mouth of a representative for the team that is developing the new UT engine that they use SLI for this very purpose. Next generation features can be done with a software wrapper, but the extra graphics processing speed does help. If there is a better alternative I would like to hear it, and by better I mean cheaper/faster/quicker to implement.

      --
      GENERATION 25: The first time you see this, copy it into your sig on any forum and add 1 to the generation. Social exper
    4. Re:Meh... by ivan256 · · Score: 1

      If there is a better alternative I would like to hear it, and by better I mean cheaper/faster/quicker to implement.

      Use one card; interpolate the performance based on the specs of the next generation hardware.

    5. Re:Meh... by Kjella · · Score: 1

      Are you saying this from experience, or are you guessing? This doesn't seem accurate to me, since next generation hardware has additional features to go with the additional performance.

      From the 7800 GTX launch at Anandtech:
      As there has been no DirectX update since the last part, NVIDIA has opted not to introduce any extra features. Their reasoning is that developers are slow enough to adopt DirectX changes, let alone a feature that would only run using OpenGL extensions. (source)

      For the most part, a 6800 SLI is pretty identical to a 7800. A 7800 SLI is likely to be pretty identical to a 8800, unless you use some DirectX10-specific features. Or at least as close as you are likely to get on currently existing hardware.

      Kjella

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
  37. 7800 is overboard anyhow by hexed_2050 · · Score: 3, Informative

    There aren't any games that require a 7800 SLI configuration and probably won't be for some time. If NVIDIA wasn't worried about releasing a card to wipe out ATI in performance, they could of released the 7800 series in another year or two and everyone would of been happy as pigs in shh.

    If Radeon can offer their SLI combination at an affordable price, there's nothing stopping me from saving a few hundred dollers and purchasing a card that generally is in the same era that games are currently in.

    Sometimes it's not all about speed, nor price, but value.

    --
    Valkyrie is about to die! Wizard needs food -- badly!
    1. Re:7800 is overboard anyhow by Soul-Burn666 · · Score: 3, Informative

      What about game developers developers developers? Graphic designers? Movie CG artists?

      The developers need the power to test now what will be standard next year.
      Graphic designers and CG artists need as much power as they can have, for previewing, since the final results are going to need considerably more power anyways, rendered in batch on clusters.

      --
      ^_^
  38. MOD ABUSE ALERT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Um.. Why was the parent post modded down? He pointed out the fact that the article submitter was Hexus itself thus nullifying the sensationalist argument that Slashdot has some sort of evil plot to take down Hexus.

    What is even more chilling is the fact the the moderator used the Overrated moderation which will not be metamoderated, thus allowing this kind of abuse to continue unchecked.

  39. Intentional Mislead by Manip · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    This quote is taken from an interview about how they had to "Start Longhorn over" in early 2004. It has thus does not relate to Windows Vista (Longhorn's new name) because it contains none of that code base which was dumped.

  40. "Multi-GPU"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Crossfire is ATi's attempt at SLi, it's not "multi-gpu", since that means multiple GPU's on one board, which crossfire is not. :/

  41. Because they're lazy and contemptuous by MondoMor · · Score: 0, Insightful

    I've written this in other comments and my karma has been oblitterated for it, but the simple answer is:

    They don't give a shit.

    Combine delusions about what Slashdot has become, with deliberate ignorance of how it is affecting the users and linkees, and you get Malda & co's current "service level".

    They don't give a shit about dupes, flamebaiting and inaccurate articlet titles, slashdotting or anything else.

    1. Re:Because they're lazy and contemptuous by FlynnMP3 · · Score: 1

      Why should they? These problems have existed for over 5 years that I can recall (at least noticeable to me). Other people have higher tolerances for duplicates and other effects. The simple fact seems to be that people come here regardless of the stuff deemed crap. The main draw of /. is the comments. That's the part of the habit that is hard to break.

      -FlynnMP3

  42. Why so much discussion on Graphics cars on /.? by unclocked · · Score: 1

    Not everyone on /. is a gamer. Moreover, a 16MB simple card works great for most of us. I often wonder why so much discussion about what ATI and NVIDIA do?

    1. Re:Why so much discussion on Graphics cars on /.? by KitesWorld · · Score: 1

      Because a lot of people use high end gaming cards as 'cheap' cards for CAD or video editing workstations. Even a $600 Geforce is cheaper than a $3000 wildcat :)

  43. everquest 2 by codehoser · · Score: 1

    True, there aren't games that _require_ such a configuration, but people hardly by video cards that fit the bare requirements. Typically, especially when dealing with the latest technology, people are looking to buy something that will play their games with all the bells and whistles.

    So, here's a challenge for anyone with the fastest card in the universe. Try running Everquest 2 in Extreme Quality mode. Zip through the detailed configuration and make sure everything is cranked. I'm talking environment shadows, maxed bump mapping distance, maxed textures, maximum number of lights and specular lights; the works. Then go on a 24 person raid, or heck, just try to stand in the middle of Willow Wood without the game turning into a slide show.

    If you manage to pull that off without crying, try 16xAF and 4xAA at 1600x1200. SLI might make it a little better, but I don't think we're going to see _smooth_ gameplay, in these conditions, at Extreme Quality with high resolution and AA/AF in this game for a year or two.

    If I'm wrong don't tell me because I don't wanna know. I can't afford it.

  44. Crossfire? Not again! by Slashdiddly · · Score: 2, Funny

    Why won't ATI heed Jon Stewart's plea? Stop, stop, stop, stop hurting America!

  45. Woah what's teh deal here? by Craptastic+Weasel · · Score: 2, Funny

    " ATI Launches Crossfire... Finally "

    And NO Duke Nukem Forever Jokes???????
    well allow them to commence in:
    5,

    4,

    3,

    ...


    Oh yeah, this is a Duke Nukem post, that countdown never hits zero... :\

  46. Caught in the Crossfire by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Crossfire by Kansas

    Underneath the sky of blue, it's a time of choosing
    Everybody's holding on, to what they're losing
    But it all works out okay, if you give your life away
    To the one who's holding fast, it's a promise that will last

    You're caught in the crossfire
    Of a greater love than man has ever known
    Caught in a crossfire
    And you've got to choose which way you're gonna go
    Caught in a crossfire
    In a world of darkness turn to the light

    Time's disappearing, all that you're fearing
    Dreamers awaken, chances are taken away

    There isn't any in-between, there's no escaping
    If you step across the line, it's illuminating
    And the words are clear and true
    And they all were meant for you
    For you harvest what you sow, so where you gonna go

    There's no pretending no other ending
    All is forgiven, if you are living anew

    Everybody faces it, now or later
    You can't get around it, 'cause it's human nature
    And deep within the hardest heart
    There is something there that knows
    There's a hunger life can never fill
    'Til you face the one who rose

    Time's disappearing, all that you're fearing
    Dreamers awaken, chances are taken
    There's no pretending no other ending
    All is forgiven, if you are living anew, living anew

  47. Re:Hexus reports on Linux by I+confirm+I'm+not+a · · Score: 1

    Why can't he come up with something new or at least factually correct?

    I believe a lot of this crap is just copied verbatim from the anti-slash site: the theory is that if a post gets highly moderated *once*, posting it again might get a troll some karma, allowing them to post real troll crap safely later. I suspect the theory is bollocks.

    --
    This is where the serious fun begins.
  48. the plan by codergeek42 · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    1. Have story posted to slashdot
    2. Have story posted to slashdot
    3. Watch the webserver melt from being slashdotted.
    4. ???
    5. PROFIT!

  49. Actually... by CurbyKirby · · Score: 4, Funny

    Looks very interesting - I'd love to get one for review.

    The point is to get TWO for review. =)

    --

    --
    "Extra Anus Kills Four-Legged Chick" -- Headline
  50. more money than brains by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Thank god for guys like you. Without you, my middle of the line video card would cost a lot more. On behalf of everyone who enjoys high performance $150 video cards, thank you from the bottom of my heart.

  51. Is ATI support on this going to be. . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Is ATI support on this going to be as good as it was for buyers of the ATI Rage Fury, as in:

    1. Hype multi-GPU product up in response to VooDoo SLI solution
    2. Provide decent performance in "ringer" drivers for specific games for reviews
    3. Provide crappy real-world performance
    4. Refuse to improve drivers
    5. Discontinue driver support

    Also, how much support are they going to provide for X.org and other GPL/open source projects? Is it going to be at least as good as Radeon efforts? Oh really, equally as good? Thanks, I'll stick with NVidia. Screw you, ATI.

  52. Re:This is bad by SamSim · · Score: 1
  53. you can buy it by ruiner5000 · · Score: 1

    and were were told this was not a paper launch. we just got nforce 430 in however.

    --
    ignorance is bliss. googlefiberatx.com
  54. Re:loo by SuperDJ · · Score: 1

    lolz

    --
    RTJKJAS
  55. Re:you can't buy it by ruiner5000 · · Score: 1

    you can't buy it, believe me, i've tried.

    --
    ignorance is bliss. googlefiberatx.com
  56. crossfire using normal hardware, easy to setup by sick_soul · · Score: 1

    > Hexus checks out Crossfire using an X850 Crossfire setup,
    > Hexus also examines how Crossfire works, how easy it is to setup

    Strange, I checked out crossfire: http://crossfire.real-time.com/ without any dedicated setup, and it was fine; the source package is autoconf based, and there are lots of binary packages available too.

  57. Re:This is bad by Loonacy · · Score: 1

    That was awesome, thanks! I wish my mod points hadn't just expired.

  58. _ UNDERLINING_ by melcrose · · Score: 0

    I can't take it. I couldn't read the article, though I did try. My brain wants to skip ahead and my eyes won't let it and.. I just get one heck of a headache. Am I alone here? eesh..

  59. I, for one, by Mechcozmo · · Score: 1
    I was pretty excited. I could buy a bunch of old graphics cards and get decent performance out of them instead of needing to buy an ultra-expensive top-of-the-line card now, and I could slowly replace my older cards as I had the cash to get better performance. Well, looks like this is a great idea, shitty execution.

    This would have been great. But ATI failed to deliver. The people like me who game every once in a while would have loved this-- we could get great frame rates without top-end cards, and we would happily buy a medium-range card (sub-$100 but over $50) for good game performance. Oh, well.

  60. Re:To bad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ATI's software is "Offtopic"?

    Morons. Mod him down for using an apostrophe in "sucks" instead.

  61. its not a review its just an insult. by deftanesthetik · · Score: 1

    i will first admit, i did not finish the article. I got to the second paragraph of the second page. already i knew it was no sort of review. He had already made up his mind about what he though. are not reviews supposed to be objective? I mean i am no pro but almost all the reviews i have had the chance to come across and read usually are(objective) and then at the end the author states his opinion. .... ughhh closemindedness as for all you guys with the whole speed issue... fps.. not always important, not everone is a gamer. I will stand by ATI no matter what, they have served me well for the last 15 years (since my 286 was ati powered) as well as Matrox. As a practical person i will take quality over quantity any day. (plus they are both canadian companies) at any rate i am begining to digress. no new to market technology is perfect, time is the factor that will tell what is will pass and what will fail peoples expectations.