Learn the standars and use them. Use Mozilla in your development phase. Save some time with things like View Selection Source, DOM-Inspector, JavaScript Debugger, LiveHTTPHeaders et cetera. Use this saved time to test with IE and add some hacks to make everything look and work the same.
It's just so easy and it works (I do it this way). And you don't have to complain about these people using IE.
This one is a valid Befunge programm too: http://communicator.aon.at/robots.txt
# ^ # If you crawl our pages with an automated robot you may not # crawl any URI begining with paths mentioned in a dissallow # directive. Otherwise you're not allowed to use your crawler # on this host. # # All this documents are belong to us #
About one year ago an other student and I tried the QNX live CD. Neutrino looked quite fine and it was an interesting OS.
But after doing a floodping at the QNX machine it stopped doing anything. I don't know if it crashed but even the window is able to handle these floodpings.
However maybe it got fixed - I'll test it again in the next days.
Let's face it, by the time you've declared you classes, instanced everything a procedural approach would probably have executed and be wating for the next client...
You could preload your code (and some kind of pre-compile) with a php script cache software like PHPA. BTW in PHP4 an object ist like an array with a table of its own functions-scope (its methods). Thus oop in PHP4 is pretty fast. PHP5 has a little bit more overhead (an object is a handle refering to the object table) but with many advantages and if it's too slow use something like phpa again.
b4n
UPDATE: We're talking about startup and new window performance. If you thought we were talking about the time it takes to render a blank page, go out back and shoot yourself; you're a detriment to human society
I'm wondering how PHP on Win32's Apache works if the libaries aren't thread safe. Apache on Win32 use two processes - some kind of watchdog and the multithreaded webserver - and it runs fine with PHP.
To speak for PHP and Apache 2 support: IMHO the currently need their time to get to PHP 5/Zend 2.
I'm using Ogg for a while now. With 80kbps it is a least as good as MP3 with 128 which means it is "better enough". It means I can save much more on this cheap 64MB cards used in MP3-players.
And OGG sounds in general better. I never had this eeks like in some MP3s and if there were some things badly converted it was just some missing things in the sound instead of distrubing sounds.
I thinks this should be enough for the normal user.
The other day I played around with PHP's socket-extension. After some reading I thought about a normal server-service I could try. A webserver came to my mind. So I made up a HTTP-server/daemon in PHP. PHP should be an extension to a webserver not a webserver itself, that's why it might fit into this topic.
I played around with it and tested it with apache benchmark. As I'm able to handle multiple request it got pretty fast and stable - even faster then pure apache (no wonder - it has more features).
The advantage of this webserver is, you don't need any php-optimizer as everything in your application gets includes in the webserver and loaded with it. If anyone wants the code just tell me...
I think the only working solution would be something like detailed categories with good names (not php/postnuke/plugins - this should be under php/cms). A voting in this categories should be made possible so you open php/cms and see "must users found postnuke the best, second rank to phpnuke, also avaible:..." This should be supported in apt-get too. Sometimes it gets really hard to guess the package name. I'm sure many before me had such ideas, but no one has really done it...
I really hate this install comparisons. How often do you install a new system? Once a half year? Or once a year? How often to you use your system. Everyday? You see the point. If my mum tells me her system is fubar she calls me to install a new system. She doesn't call me everyday when she wants to use the system. Usability in daily work is much more important especially for the simple-minded user.
You don't need his email-adresse and disturb him. Most programmers don't know the RFC about example.[com|net|org] - just type in anything@example.com and they'll be happy. If the know this RFC the do not know this works with example.at as well.
Learn the standars and use them. Use Mozilla in your development phase. Save some time with things like View Selection Source, DOM-Inspector, JavaScript Debugger, LiveHTTPHeaders et cetera. Use this saved time to test with IE and add some hacks to make everything look and work the same.
It's just so easy and it works (I do it this way). And you don't have to complain about these people using IE.
b4n
This one is a valid Befunge programm too: http://communicator.aon.at/robots.txt
/assets/ /admin/ /_vti_bin/ /MSOffice/ /.oliver/
,:
# ^
# If you crawl our pages with an automated robot you may not
# crawl any URI begining with paths mentioned in a dissallow
# directive. Otherwise you're not allowed to use your crawler
# on this host.
#
# All this documents are belong to us
#
User-agent: *
Disallow:
Disallow:
Disallow:
Disallow:
Disallow:
# communicator coded by AB, AH, BA, CF, MH, NE, OK
# additional work by BO, DP, MG, MH, UH
# >0"YVAN EHT NIOJ"v
# >v <
#
# ^_ @
About one year ago an other student and I tried the QNX live CD. Neutrino looked quite fine and it was an interesting OS.
But after doing a floodping at the QNX machine it stopped doing anything. I don't know if it crashed but even the window is able to handle these floodpings.
However maybe it got fixed - I'll test it again in the next days.
b4n
Let's face it, by the time you've declared you classes, instanced everything a procedural approach would probably have executed and be wating for the next client...
You could preload your code (and some kind of pre-compile) with a php script cache software like PHPA. BTW in PHP4 an object ist like an array with a table of its own functions-scope (its methods). Thus oop in PHP4 is pretty fast. PHP5 has a little bit more overhead (an object is a handle refering to the object table) but with many advantages and if it's too slow use something like phpa again.
b4n
Just read the update:
;)
UPDATE: We're talking about startup and new window performance. If you thought we were talking about the time it takes to render a blank page, go out back and shoot yourself; you're a detriment to human society
At least these guys have a sense of humor
b4n
I'm wondering how PHP on Win32's Apache works if the libaries aren't thread safe. Apache on Win32 use two processes - some kind of watchdog and the multithreaded webserver - and it runs fine with PHP.
To speak for PHP and Apache 2 support: IMHO the currently need their time to get to PHP 5/Zend 2.
b4n
At least for the Auto-ID thing you might be interested in the text I wrote about it:: auto-Id in the nutshell
b4n
I'm using Ogg for a while now. With 80kbps it is a least as good as MP3 with 128 which means it is "better enough". It means I can save much more on this cheap 64MB cards used in MP3-players.
And OGG sounds in general better. I never had this eeks like in some MP3s and if there were some things badly converted it was just some missing things in the sound instead of distrubing sounds.
I thinks this should be enough for the normal user.
b4n
As I really code requests for my code (oh my ;) you may download it at http://www.chatternation.net/alpha/sources/httpd.z ip
have fun =)
b4n
You could start with this, which describes the situation at 9/11 - I know not much but better than nothing ...
b4n
The other day I played around with PHP's socket-extension. After some reading I thought about a normal server-service I could try. A webserver came to my mind. So I made up a HTTP-server/daemon in PHP. PHP should be an extension to a webserver not a webserver itself, that's why it might fit into this topic.
...
I played around with it and tested it with apache benchmark. As I'm able to handle multiple request it got pretty fast and stable - even faster then pure apache (no wonder - it has more features).
The advantage of this webserver is, you don't need any php-optimizer as everything in your application gets includes in the webserver and loaded with it. If anyone wants the code just tell me
b4n
I think the only working solution would be something like detailed categories with good names (not php/postnuke/plugins - this should be under php/cms). A voting in this categories should be made possible so you open php/cms and see "must users found postnuke the best, second rank to phpnuke, also avaible: ..." This should be supported in apt-get too. Sometimes it gets really hard to guess the package name. I'm sure many before me had such ideas, but no one has really done it ...
b4n
Maybe the article Handling the Loads, describing how Slashdot kept their Servers up at 9/11, is a bit of the thing you're looking for. b4n
It'd be enough to change integers to unsigned integers in the meanwhile IMHO. We'd count 'till 2106 then ...
b4n
I really hate this install comparisons. How often do you install a new system? Once a half year? Or once a year? How often to you use your system. Everyday? You see the point. If my mum tells me her system is fubar she calls me to install a new system. She doesn't call me everyday when she wants to use the system. Usability in daily work is much more important especially for the simple-minded user.
b4n
see the pic here ? See the ring? Would you buy from some one with two left hands? ;)
b4n
I think I should stop playing with it and go to bed. Maybe the need for sleep makes me crazy ...
searching for "The truth about Bill Gates"
...
The result is some kind of swastika
a passphrase is easy to remember and long enough (at least 15 chars. ) to be secure.
b4n
So it's a patent that only works with IE isn't it? So what does MS think about someone patenting a part of their Software?
b4n
Have you checked if no one already has a patent on denosing smileys?
b4n
You don't need his email-adresse and disturb him. Most programmers don't know the RFC about example.[com|net|org] - just type in anything@example.com and they'll be happy. If the know this RFC the do not know this works with example.at as well.
b4n
Shoudln't try to post with bad people around.
What they really wanted to say was: "ha Yahoo we posted this days before you. You lamers!"
What they really wanted to say was: "ha Yahoo we days before you. You lamers!"
b4n
you could support ogg and write hardware producers to support ogg. tell them it's free and they get it for foo, but it compresses better.
read this comment and help supporting ogg for the iPod
b4n