That's what's the courts are for, though they've been generally been too cost prohibitive for the common man to get justice there. Though, in this case, small claims court might work. Microsoft is betting that people won't take that avenue and it's a pretty safe bet.
It sounded like he was saying that no longer being able to use the software isn't a serious loss to the person who obtained it for free. The loss does go both ways though as if Microsoft let them continue to use it the opportunity to sell them it for the price they want to sell it at would be lost, legitimately or otherwise. It seems that some people don't think in terms of legitimate and illegitimate losses. Once you've sold something, the ability to sell that something again is generally considered to be legitimately lost to you.
Pot, kettle, whatever, nevermind...
Well, obviously, when he's not at work he's at home, resting up to go back to work. And obviously there's more than one of these women... It's not like it's the same woman you're looking at all the time, so of course with another woman there's another man at work. The rest of the time, they're both at home together.
It's not that it's encouragement, or else "You're going to do just fine," would suffice. It's specifically, other people struggle, too. The disadvantaged person who would end up bailing otherwise, was probably thinking that the other people make it because it is a breeze for them; it's not a breeze for me, so I'm probably not going to make it, so I might as well quit now.
I agree with much of what you say, but we have a pretty good grasp of how the brain processes data. They tend to get a little confused on the terminology, like for some reason only the electrical firing qualifies as "signaling" and not apparently chemical transferrals. They have any number of ways of getting data to replacement appendages and even wire up primitive artificial eyes. They have implants for some seizure conditions. There's no firm lines between the knowns and the unknowns, though.
No, the biggest feature of the Windows Insider builds is that they start letting you have some say in what W10 should be, or pretend to let you... I'm sorry, but I find myself having trouble typing this with whatever's the text equivalent of a straight face.
Just remembered... I don't know how standards compliant Edge is, but apparently there was a page the other day that Edge couldn't handle, apparently because the page wasn't standards compliant enough, and Edge offered to pass it to IE for me.
Wait... I WANT them to find something useful... to me. In fact, while I don't assign them the noblest of motives, at least I'm aware of what all of this is supposed to be about which is companies providing services and things to people that they actually want.
How does anyone expect anyone else to do something useful for them if they don't want them to listen. I used to be a lot more concerned about the clandestine nature of the trade agreements until I got a good look at the people they were keeping them a secret from. I'm still somewhat concerned, but still... Just who am I supposed to be rooting for in the big "Samaritan"/"The Machine" "Person of Interest" mash-up knowing what I know now?
Don't remind me how Microsoft decided the Edge favorites menu in the previously current build needed to be completely broken and not just hobbled as in previous builds.
Hey, like you, I don't like Edge, but not like you, I appreciate the ability to file bugs that unlike any other browser comes with using Nightly, keep on top of your bugs and they do get fixed... for the most part and I 've had a better track record with Nightly than release versions of the other browsers, which largely revolves around how I'm visually impaired and how browsers respond when I crank the font size up... got a tracking bug on elements of Nightly that do not play nicely with Windows 10 default font sizes set to 20. Microsoft does its part in messing with me by resetting the default font sizes to 9 every time it installs a build, which it probably will do again when I download this build.
I haven't been particularly attentive to my computer lately and I 've been running these builds, and Slashdot got me this info before I got it from the Feedback Hub just because I happened to check Slashdot on my Android phone. Steam hasn't been displaying web pages on recent builds, but I haven't seen much noise about it so that might be a misconfiguration unique to me. Microsoft's determined to make Windows even more of a black box they don't want people to see inside, which will be just fantastic for malware makers and may help them get their foot in the door for making console malware.
The so-called "Russian trolls" bit is real, but it's also a really old story and belongs nowhere in this piece. It took me some time to find the magic search terms, but https://www.bing.com/search?q=... returns the relevant results.
I buy games through bundles and one says unequivocally that PayPal has the lowest fees, but they use a separate processor for credit cards. eBay still uses only PayPal, despite them being split up into two separate companies again. I used to have a Google Wallet account to use a credit card, but they've discontinued the credit card feature, and recommended Simple.com. I've taken to having PayPal pulling money from my Simple.com account, the first time I've been having things work that way. I was sick in the hospital and PayPal effectively floated me about a $16 0% perpetual loan because of Netflix and Hulu. By the way, if you are in the hospital and automatic withdrawals make you go into overdraft, many banks/credit unions will refund you overdraft fees if you tell them you were in the hospital. PayPal has what I consider a stupid withdraw from bank account but don't withdraw until certain terms are met but the money apparently appears in the seller's account on time feature. There was an invalid withdrawal made from my account and I reported it at http://www.ic3.gov/complaint/d... and PayPal put the money back. Once they've made a decision you can actually appeal it, though they don't make that clear. I'm just not seeing most of the things that people are making complaints about PayPal.
While I do have perceptual problems, in this case we are talking about someone walking around their neighborhood, not a car going about the same speed as another car. Besides how often do you see someone looking down at their phone, and how do you distinguish it from them looking down at say, their speedometer. I ride with two different people now, and neither one of them look down at their phone. Having perceptual problems has resulted in my documenting better what my eyes pass my way because I have to navve many takes sometimes to figure out what's happening. Too slow for driving, but I get a better detailed result: Is this person looking down? What viewing angles catch what? There was this cop once that gave my mom a ticket that claimed he had his eyes on her car the whole time as he was turning his car around. Listening to different people and my own observations there were a number of different scenarios that fit what people thought happened. Nobody wants to believe that they just aren't that good an observer, despite studies showing that people are poor observers. I haven't heard any studies establishing how good "trained observers" are at observing, but I have my doubts.
But only for certain types of use. What I want to know is, how is that guy able to see people looking down at their phones. My guess is that he's just an idiot who is guessing at what someone would have to do to use Waze, and then just claiming he saw people looking down at their phone. It's my understanding that Google bought Waze and if I recall correctly I as a passenger saw an indication of an accident on Google Maps that read "reported by Waze".
It's not his fault that "City Park Apartments" has such a generic name and wesn't set off with quotation marks as one resource I looked at mentioned things that do not normally stand by themselves should.
That sounds like Windows 10, only W10 will shut down silently programs that have open windows. Android can shut down visible processes... Alright, between the lot of computer programs/OSs the terminology gets dodgy.
Slashdot Mirror
The typlcal response to a statement like yours is: "That explains you, then."
That's what's the courts are for, though they've been generally been too cost prohibitive for the common man to get justice there. Though, in this case, small claims court might work. Microsoft is betting that people won't take that avenue and it's a pretty safe bet.
It sounded like he was saying that no longer being able to use the software isn't a serious loss to the person who obtained it for free. The loss does go both ways though as if Microsoft let them continue to use it the opportunity to sell them it for the price they want to sell it at would be lost, legitimately or otherwise. It seems that some people don't think in terms of legitimate and illegitimate losses. Once you've sold something, the ability to sell that something again is generally considered to be legitimately lost to you.
Pot, kettle, whatever, nevermind...
Well, obviously, when he's not at work he's at home, resting up to go back to work. And obviously there's more than one of these women... It's not like it's the same woman you're looking at all the time, so of course with another woman there's another man at work. The rest of the time, they're both at home together.
It's not that it's encouragement, or else "You're going to do just fine," would suffice. It's specifically, other people struggle, too. The disadvantaged person who would end up bailing otherwise, was probably thinking that the other people make it because it is a breeze for them; it's not a breeze for me, so I'm probably not going to make it, so I might as well quit now.
I'm getting mixed messages here. I thought the daddy was supposed to be at work. Now you're telling me he's supposed to be where the mother is?
The color of the Taskbar can be changed, but it shares that color with other Windows elements. I've submitted feedback for more granular control.
I agree with much of what you say, but we have a pretty good grasp of how the brain processes data. They tend to get a little confused on the terminology, like for some reason only the electrical firing qualifies as "signaling" and not apparently chemical transferrals. They have any number of ways of getting data to replacement appendages and even wire up primitive artificial eyes. They have implants for some seizure conditions. There's no firm lines between the knowns and the unknowns, though.
I hear it has something to do with pants.
No, the biggest feature of the Windows Insider builds is that they start letting you have some say in what W10 should be, or pretend to let you... I'm sorry, but I find myself having trouble typing this with whatever's the text equivalent of a straight face.
Just remembered... I don't know how standards compliant Edge is, but apparently there was a page the other day that Edge couldn't handle, apparently because the page wasn't standards compliant enough, and Edge offered to pass it to IE for me.
Wait... I WANT them to find something useful... to me. In fact, while I don't assign them the noblest of motives, at least I'm aware of what all of this is supposed to be about which is companies providing services and things to people that they actually want.
How does anyone expect anyone else to do something useful for them if they don't want them to listen. I used to be a lot more concerned about the clandestine nature of the trade agreements until I got a good look at the people they were keeping them a secret from. I'm still somewhat concerned, but still... Just who am I supposed to be rooting for in the big "Samaritan"/"The Machine" "Person of Interest" mash-up knowing what I know now?
Don't remind me how Microsoft decided the Edge favorites menu in the previously current build needed to be completely broken and not just hobbled as in previous builds.
Hey, like you, I don't like Edge, but not like you, I appreciate the ability to file bugs that unlike any other browser comes with using Nightly, keep on top of your bugs and they do get fixed... for the most part and I 've had a better track record with Nightly than release versions of the other browsers, which largely revolves around how I'm visually impaired and how browsers respond when I crank the font size up... got a tracking bug on elements of Nightly that do not play nicely with Windows 10 default font sizes set to 20. Microsoft does its part in messing with me by resetting the default font sizes to 9 every time it installs a build, which it probably will do again when I download this build.
I haven't been particularly attentive to my computer lately and I 've been running these builds, and Slashdot got me this info before I got it from the Feedback Hub just because I happened to check Slashdot on my Android phone. Steam hasn't been displaying web pages on recent builds, but I haven't seen much noise about it so that might be a misconfiguration unique to me. Microsoft's determined to make Windows even more of a black box they don't want people to see inside, which will be just fantastic for malware makers and may help them get their foot in the door for making console malware.
The so-called "Russian trolls" bit is real, but it's also a really old story and belongs nowhere in this piece. It took me some time to find the magic search terms, but https://www.bing.com/search?q=... returns the relevant results.
Poe's law? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/P...
I buy games through bundles and one says unequivocally that PayPal has the lowest fees, but they use a separate processor for credit cards. eBay still uses only PayPal, despite them being split up into two separate companies again. I used to have a Google Wallet account to use a credit card, but they've discontinued the credit card feature, and recommended Simple.com. I've taken to having PayPal pulling money from my Simple.com account, the first time I've been having things work that way. I was sick in the hospital and PayPal effectively floated me about a $16 0% perpetual loan because of Netflix and Hulu. By the way, if you are in the hospital and automatic withdrawals make you go into overdraft, many banks/credit unions will refund you overdraft fees if you tell them you were in the hospital. PayPal has what I consider a stupid withdraw from bank account but don't withdraw until certain terms are met but the money apparently appears in the seller's account on time feature. There was an invalid withdrawal made from my account and I reported it at http://www.ic3.gov/complaint/d... and PayPal put the money back. Once they've made a decision you can actually appeal it, though they don't make that clear. I'm just not seeing most of the things that people are making complaints about PayPal.
While I do have perceptual problems, in this case we are talking about someone walking around their neighborhood, not a car going about the same speed as another car. Besides how often do you see someone looking down at their phone, and how do you distinguish it from them looking down at say, their speedometer. I ride with two different people now, and neither one of them look down at their phone. Having perceptual problems has resulted in my documenting better what my eyes pass my way because I have to navve many takes sometimes to figure out what's happening. Too slow for driving, but I get a better detailed result: Is this person looking down? What viewing angles catch what? There was this cop once that gave my mom a ticket that claimed he had his eyes on her car the whole time as he was turning his car around. Listening to different people and my own observations there were a number of different scenarios that fit what people thought happened. Nobody wants to believe that they just aren't that good an observer, despite studies showing that people are poor observers. I haven't heard any studies establishing how good "trained observers" are at observing, but I have my doubts.
Bsck in the day, they'd AND, OR, and XOR each other, too... and occasionally they might do it with tiles... so I've heard.
Well... That happened.
But only for certain types of use. What I want to know is, how is that guy able to see people looking down at their phones. My guess is that he's just an idiot who is guessing at what someone would have to do to use Waze, and then just claiming he saw people looking down at their phone. It's my understanding that Google bought Waze and if I recall correctly I as a passenger saw an indication of an accident on Google Maps that read "reported by Waze".
It's not his fault that "City Park Apartments" has such a generic name and wesn't set off with quotation marks as one resource I looked at mentioned things that do not normally stand by themselves should.
That sounds like Windows 10, only W10 will shut down silently programs that have open windows. Android can shut down visible processes ... Alright, between the lot of computer programs/OSs the terminology gets dodgy.