The original was Starfleet officers reminding each other of stuff that they should have learned at the academy. Just the other day they showed the one with the planet killer and they said that the doctor would have to assess the commodore and then the doctor acted as if he was powerless to tell the commodore to go to sick bay to get evaluated. I was like, if the doctor is powerless then the rule lacks teeth. Then the captain orders Spock to relieve the commodore, and instead of making a big deal about mutiny and having or trying to have security escort Spock to the brig, he moves aside and lets Spock take command.
For every mention of why do something good when situation x results in that goodness being diminished, I answer "Because that is the sort of person I want to be."
The original Visual BASIC was backward compatible for the most part with Quick BASIC. QB64, while not backward compatible with VB is also backward compatible with QB, with its own extensions.
No, it's the one where Keanu Reeves outruns an explosion on a motorcycle. Keanu Reeves and Johnny Depp have similar features, so I can see how you could get confused.
In some circles the headline is, "Obama Backed Solar Plant Catches Fire". Just how involved were either involved, how many other investors were there, and will their investment still eventually pay off? Lazy clickbait journalists and editors.
I don't go through any trouble to find a phone that reads and writes MicroSDHC cards. Problem is SDHC cards only go up to 32GB and capacities greater than that are SDXC cards. I caught Sony selling a card branded as a MicroSDHC card and reported it to the SD consortium. I got a one sentence email that read "We will deal with Sony."
But is the lockpicker inflating the count? Or from the way he talked about his exploits, letting the writer or readers' imaginations do the job for him.
How cute, a person who has just now noticed some people that have an affiliation with each other don't like it when things aren't slanted their way. There are many more people than just the right wing that don't like it when things aren't slanted their way, of all sorts of political backgrounds. Remember little miss "what difference does it make" and I don't know much about servers but I'll run my own anyways? I don't have much of a definitive list, just picking up things as I go along, and from what I've been told the generation currently in grade school are getting the understanding that if they don't like how they are treated by staff, (a substitute teacher, for example) they can go to the office and complain. I've had bad teachers and substitutes, but I had some understanding that being able to deal with the situation prepared me for things in the future. Many of the parents of such children don't like the lessons that are different, not slanted their way, but the lessons they rail against are not the ones that are making the kids have a low tolerance. If someone hasn't already bought them like me, Goodwill stores and thrift shops should have materials that state they are for teaching common core. If that fails, I don't find it unlikely to source the materials from some other place inexpensive, relatively speaking.
Nitpicking a little bit, that's if you consider Jan 21, 2014 new. Though, I suppose there are more recent examples, but finding an article covering them is going to be harder because they haven't had enough time to get higher page rankings, among other reasons.
Your comment makes no sense. I started writing this post without visiting the link but stopped myself and your comment still was nonsense, like a bunch of English words randomly strung together.
Can you explain what "That" you are referring to in the previous post is? This is a problem of people and people have many avenues of dealing with the problem. You are probably one of those people who agree with the statement "No one is above the law", but the relationship between people, the law, and society is very different from that. Saying, " acting outside or within the boundaries of the law is an improvement from my perspective, but not by much.
There are a lot of concepts that are popular, but I don't care for, and the notion that people shouldn't get something they aren't entitled to is one of them. People don't make a case for this perception and instead believe that everyone believes this and on top of it anyone who believes that they should be allowed to acquire something believe that they are entitled to it. Listen, I don't care about your entitlement nonsense; If my acquiring something makes no one else the lesser, I should be allowed to acquire it as opposed to, for example it being binned.
It is really weird when Christians say that people should not have anything they aren't entitled to or deserve, because the primary part of Christianity is about a God going through convoluted motions in order for people to get something the faith saus they aren't entitled to/deserve/earned, that being not spending an eternity in Hell.
"Fairness" is another. If things were made completely fair, they would have to handicap or to the logical extreme kill everyone because it isn't fair when there's the already dead if anyone else is alive.
Both money and the internet and even time are best defined as tools. As I've been working on this post, it occured to.me: Laws and religion? Tools. Machiavellian and Art of War? Tools. Now that I've defined the tools in the toolbox, I can proceed. If you aren't willing to use money to get what you want then it is worth nothing in terms of money to you. However, if you find it's worth the time, effort, Internet usage, and flouting of the law, then that's what it's worth to you. Oh and morality? Tool, too.
Back when shareware on CDs were a thing, none of it was worth buying/acquiring. But now that I have money and those titles are on Steam, they're woth paying money for. And actually, somewhere between the two times, acquiring some of the games was worth "pirating". DRM? I never thought I'd accept it, but Steam pretty much does it right, offering redownloading to the same or different PC. GOG has a "Galaxy" app that does the same for non-DRM titles and I've read that they've worked on the older titles to get them to work better than the Steam release.
I had been attempting to acquire a lot of physical Shin Megami Tensei" games used for the PS 1 and 2, and then there was a sale for them for download to the PS3.
None of this "excuses" "piracy" because I don't believe that it needs an excuse, but rather the onus is on others to induce me to stop. So, what was all of this for? To illustrate that under the right circumstances I can be pursuaded to do something other than piracy to get what I want.
Sure, urinals take up less space, but there's nothing... correct that, only social mores to prevent them from doing that without putting a wall up that itself takes up space. A slightly revised version of what I said above it that it protects women from potentially getting a glimpse of a man's privates, because if one did... something, something, the predator would lie down with the prey or something.
A good example of how silly this all is. Same-sex marriage is not just available for two people who want to have sex with each other. If two people of the same sex who don't want to have sex with each other want to get married the law applies to them too. It would be interesting to see how a blanket law that allows businesses to discriminate based on whatever ungodliness they observe in another person. I haven't really dug into the bills to see if they actually enable that, but all the furor is over rejecting selling to people with sexual beliefs that are viewed by the people running the business to be unGodly.
Besides, from what I've read separate bathrooms for people of different sex had more to do with saving women from men's boorishness, not rape, and it isn't a deterrent for any would-be rapist to go into the women's bathroom. In fact, separate bathrooms could exacerbate the situation as a non-rapist male isn't nearby to intervene should a rapist be so inclined.
Let's say for purposes of example that there were lots of apples but only one green pear and one orange. Now the orange is more unique than the pear, because while the orange's shape and the apple's shape are more rounder than the pear, the pear's skin is more like the apple's skin in both texture and color and the pear and apple aren't segmented like the orange.
No, it's not. Wikipedia: Newspeak
Newspeak is the fictional language in the novel Nineteen Eighty-Four, written by George Orwell. It is a controlled language created by the totalitarian state Oceania as a tool to limit freedom of thought, and concepts that pose a threat to the regime such as freedom, self-expression, individuality, and peace. Any form of thought alternative to the party's construct is classified as "thoughtcrime".
Manipulating the way that people who agree with you use language by suggesting alternative word constructs to help them avoid words that come with emotional baggage only bears a superficial resemblance to the definition of Newspeak.
"Inserting themselves into a side of a debate" is an odd word choice for saying that they actively chose a side. In any difference of opinion, if you don't actively choose a side you've passively chosen a side.- and there's pretty much always more than two sides.
That's funny because the AP doesn't think of you at all. They continue to make these things because there are people who do want to follow their lead, not make converts.
Slashdot Mirror
The original was Starfleet officers reminding each other of stuff that they should have learned at the academy. Just the other day they showed the one with the planet killer and they said that the doctor would have to assess the commodore and then the doctor acted as if he was powerless to tell the commodore to go to sick bay to get evaluated. I was like, if the doctor is powerless then the rule lacks teeth. Then the captain orders Spock to relieve the commodore, and instead of making a big deal about mutiny and having or trying to have security escort Spock to the brig, he moves aside and lets Spock take command.
For every mention of why do something good when situation x results in that goodness being diminished, I answer "Because that is the sort of person I want to be."
The original Visual BASIC was backward compatible for the most part with Quick BASIC. QB64, while not backward compatible with VB is also backward compatible with QB, with its own extensions.
No, it's the one where Keanu Reeves outruns an explosion on a motorcycle. Keanu Reeves and Johnny Depp have similar features, so I can see how you could get confused.
In some circles the headline is, "Obama Backed Solar Plant Catches Fire". Just how involved were either involved, how many other investors were there, and will their investment still eventually pay off? Lazy clickbait journalists and editors.
Actually I find it unlikely that the military wants Cortana.
I don't go through any trouble to find a phone that reads and writes MicroSDHC cards. Problem is SDHC cards only go up to 32GB and capacities greater than that are SDXC cards. I caught Sony selling a card branded as a MicroSDHC card and reported it to the SD consortium. I got a one sentence email that read "We will deal with Sony."
But is the lockpicker inflating the count? Or from the way he talked about his exploits, letting the writer or readers' imaginations do the job for him.
How cute, a person who has just now noticed some people that have an affiliation with each other don't like it when things aren't slanted their way. There are many more people than just the right wing that don't like it when things aren't slanted their way, of all sorts of political backgrounds. Remember little miss "what difference does it make" and I don't know much about servers but I'll run my own anyways? I don't have much of a definitive list, just picking up things as I go along, and from what I've been told the generation currently in grade school are getting the understanding that if they don't like how they are treated by staff, (a substitute teacher, for example) they can go to the office and complain. I've had bad teachers and substitutes, but I had some understanding that being able to deal with the situation prepared me for things in the future. Many of the parents of such children don't like the lessons that are different, not slanted their way, but the lessons they rail against are not the ones that are making the kids have a low tolerance. If someone hasn't already bought them like me, Goodwill stores and thrift shops should have materials that state they are for teaching common core. If that fails, I don't find it unlikely to source the materials from some other place inexpensive, relatively speaking.
Nitpicking a little bit, that's if you consider Jan 21, 2014 new. Though, I suppose there are more recent examples, but finding an article covering them is going to be harder because they haven't had enough time to get higher page rankings, among other reasons.
There's a closed door pharmacy in Muncie, IN, that has an instrumental arrangement of "Still Alive" from the game "Portal" as their hold music.
Your comment makes no sense. I started writing this post without visiting the link but stopped myself and your comment still was nonsense, like a bunch of English words randomly strung together.
But if you do enough searches in a month you get gold status and that Amazon card is even cheaper
Can you explain what "That" you are referring to in the previous post is? This is a problem of people and people have many avenues of dealing with the problem. You are probably one of those people who agree with the statement "No one is above the law", but the relationship between people, the law, and society is very different from that. Saying, " acting outside or within the boundaries of the law is an improvement from my perspective, but not by much.
Semantics. What is it good for? Absolutely nothing.
There are a lot of concepts that are popular, but I don't care for, and the notion that people shouldn't get something they aren't entitled to is one of them. People don't make a case for this perception and instead believe that everyone believes this and on top of it anyone who believes that they should be allowed to acquire something believe that they are entitled to it. Listen, I don't care about your entitlement nonsense; If my acquiring something makes no one else the lesser, I should be allowed to acquire it as opposed to, for example it being binned.
It is really weird when Christians say that people should not have anything they aren't entitled to or deserve, because the primary part of Christianity is about a God going through convoluted motions in order for people to get something the faith saus they aren't entitled to/deserve/earned, that being not spending an eternity in Hell.
"Fairness" is another. If things were made completely fair, they would have to handicap or to the logical extreme kill everyone because it isn't fair when there's the already dead if anyone else is alive.
Both money and the internet and even time are best defined as tools. As I've been working on this post, it occured to.me: Laws and religion? Tools. Machiavellian and Art of War? Tools. Now that I've defined the tools in the toolbox, I can proceed. If you aren't willing to use money to get what you want then it is worth nothing in terms of money to you. However, if you find it's worth the time, effort, Internet usage, and flouting of the law, then that's what it's worth to you. Oh and morality? Tool, too. Back when shareware on CDs were a thing, none of it was worth buying/acquiring. But now that I have money and those titles are on Steam, they're woth paying money for. And actually, somewhere between the two times, acquiring some of the games was worth "pirating". DRM? I never thought I'd accept it, but Steam pretty much does it right, offering redownloading to the same or different PC. GOG has a "Galaxy" app that does the same for non-DRM titles and I've read that they've worked on the older titles to get them to work better than the Steam release.
I had been attempting to acquire a lot of physical Shin Megami Tensei" games used for the PS 1 and 2, and then there was a sale for them for download to the PS3.
None of this "excuses" "piracy" because I don't believe that it needs an excuse, but rather the onus is on others to induce me to stop. So, what was all of this for? To illustrate that under the right circumstances I can be pursuaded to do something other than piracy to get what I want.
Sure, urinals take up less space, but there's nothing... correct that, only social mores to prevent them from doing that without putting a wall up that itself takes up space. A slightly revised version of what I said above it that it protects women from potentially getting a glimpse of a man's privates, because if one did... something, something, the predator would lie down with the prey or something.
How ironic is it that oxygen is made of protons, neutrons and electrons and so are poisons.
A good example of how silly this all is. Same-sex marriage is not just available for two people who want to have sex with each other. If two people of the same sex who don't want to have sex with each other want to get married the law applies to them too. It would be interesting to see how a blanket law that allows businesses to discriminate based on whatever ungodliness they observe in another person. I haven't really dug into the bills to see if they actually enable that, but all the furor is over rejecting selling to people with sexual beliefs that are viewed by the people running the business to be unGodly.
Besides, from what I've read separate bathrooms for people of different sex had more to do with saving women from men's boorishness, not rape, and it isn't a deterrent for any would-be rapist to go into the women's bathroom. In fact, separate bathrooms could exacerbate the situation as a non-rapist male isn't nearby to intervene should a rapist be so inclined.
Let's say for purposes of example that there were lots of apples but only one green pear and one orange. Now the orange is more unique than the pear, because while the orange's shape and the apple's shape are more rounder than the pear, the pear's skin is more like the apple's skin in both texture and color and the pear and apple aren't segmented like the orange.
Well if you are using all of them as part of a username with websites that may or may not treat your username as case sensitive, you might.
No, it's not.
Wikipedia: Newspeak
Newspeak is the fictional language in the novel Nineteen Eighty-Four, written by George Orwell. It is a controlled language created by the totalitarian state Oceania as a tool to limit freedom of thought, and concepts that pose a threat to the regime such as freedom, self-expression, individuality, and peace. Any form of thought alternative to the party's construct is classified as "thoughtcrime".
Manipulating the way that people who agree with you use language by suggesting alternative word constructs to help them avoid words that come with emotional baggage only bears a superficial resemblance to the definition of Newspeak.
"Inserting themselves into a side of a debate" is an odd word choice for saying that they actively chose a side. In any difference of opinion, if you don't actively choose a side you've passively chosen a side.- and there's pretty much always more than two sides.
Not more sophisticated, but more convenient. At least that's why I do it.
That's funny because the AP doesn't think of you at all. They continue to make these things because there are people who do want to follow their lead, not make converts.