The majority of DVD-Videos I have seen are single layer... And using MPEG-4, dual layer video could easily fit in one layer without significant quality loss.
Except that being encircled doesn't mean you will lose... Many options: - Live until said player loses (his wall goes away) - Try to squeeze through the hole: actual sealing is virtually impossible. - Wait for someone to make a hole: same variants leave circular explosion-holes around someone losing
Buying from a repackaged source doesn't give you support or a warranty-- you keep that value.
It is a natural right to modify and share information. An idea is yours only when you keep it to yourself. Share it with anyone else, and it becomes theirs also.
Nothing in the GPL requires you to give away anything. Just that you allow whomever you decide to give or sell your software to to exercise their rights to modify and share it.
Sure, choose what you will or won't share-- but don't tell others that they cannot make that same decision. If you are overcharging so much that there is a market for someone to repackage-and-sell, that's nobody's fault but your own.
I never said people suddenly shouldn't be responsible for things caused by their actions. If there is damage done by a doctor sharing your medical records, he is still at fault. Likewise with your other example.
The GPL's restrictions do little more than preserve humans' natural rights to modify and share information. If your line of work relies on violating others rights, then you should find another one. There are plenty of ways to make money from software without denying others their rights. Yes, you'll need to actually compete, but that's a good thing.
The GPL license for Qt is available gratis, regardless of what the license is. The only limitations under the GPL are that you must not limit others-- perfectly acceptable. The GPL restrictions should replace copyright law-- that solves all your problems.
Why the GPL? In this case, because Qt is only currently available gratis under the GPL. In general, because the GPL restrictions are equivalent to what proper laws concerning information would be.
*Sharing information* is a natural right and not morally wrong *at all*.
Marijuana, last I checked, hurts the person using it-- only in some cases do the benefits outweigh the negatives. But, just like everything, it should still at least be legal to possess or sell.
Products supporting Win32: Windows and WINE Products supporting Qt: Windows, Mac OS X, X11, and Linux Products supporting POSIX: *BSD, Linux, and Mac OS X
Win32 certainly doesn't look like a standard to me... it doesn't even have consistent behaviour with itself.
Nope, he is quite right. The problem is the flawed design used by systems such as credit cards and social security for authentication. If they were designed properly, sharing information wouldn't be a problem.
It's simple-- someone is threatening your rights, you exercise those rights as much as possible.
In this case, it's the US Gov't and various corporations threatening our right to share information.
Slashdot Mirror
It's not so much trust as it is about the government doing their job and only that.
Now that you've posted this, it's probably fixed.
The majority of DVD-Videos I have seen are single layer... And using MPEG-4, dual layer video could easily fit in one layer without significant quality loss.
I'm saying his actions are not morally wrong because he shared information. They would be wrong because he caused damage to said person.
Which all demonstrate exactly why the government should have no part in prohibiting it.
I think you mean it implies a finite plane whereas Earth is an infinite plane. Shapes and slopes really don't affect the circling.
Except that being encircled doesn't mean you will lose... Many options:
- Live until said player loses (his wall goes away)
- Try to squeeze through the hole: actual sealing is virtually impossible.
- Wait for someone to make a hole: same variants leave circular explosion-holes around someone losing
Buying from a repackaged source doesn't give you support or a warranty-- you keep that value.
It is a natural right to modify and share information. An idea is yours only when you keep it to yourself. Share it with anyone else, and it becomes theirs also.
You don't have a right to tell others what to do.
BTW, here's a link to CVS snapshots ("betas").
Not many servers making use of the new features, but "HexaTRON Server" is the one in the screenshot.
For those who want to run a server, here is an index of maps-- if you have any to add, email me to add them.
Nibbles is one of the two demo games that came with QuickBasic. (the other being Gorilla)
Nothing in the GPL requires you to give away anything. Just that you allow whomever you decide to give or sell your software to to exercise their rights to modify and share it.
Sure, choose what you will or won't share-- but don't tell others that they cannot make that same decision. If you are overcharging so much that there is a market for someone to repackage-and-sell, that's nobody's fault but your own.
I never said people suddenly shouldn't be responsible for things caused by their actions. If there is damage done by a doctor sharing your medical records, he is still at fault. Likewise with your other example.
The GPL's restrictions do little more than preserve humans' natural rights to modify and share information. If your line of work relies on violating others rights, then you should find another one. There are plenty of ways to make money from software without denying others their rights. Yes, you'll need to actually compete, but that's a good thing.
The computer game prepares for version 0.2.8, featuring support for non-square arenas.
The GPL license for Qt is available gratis, regardless of what the license is. The only limitations under the GPL are that you must not limit others-- perfectly acceptable. The GPL restrictions should replace copyright law-- that solves all your problems.
Why the GPL? In this case, because Qt is only currently available gratis under the GPL. In general, because the GPL restrictions are equivalent to what proper laws concerning information would be.
*Sharing information* is a natural right and not morally wrong *at all*.
Marijuana, last I checked, hurts the person using it-- only in some cases do the benefits outweigh the negatives. But, just like everything, it should still at least be legal to possess or sell.
Nope, Qt is available gratis under the GPL for Windows, too.
If e-tax isn't GPL-compatible, then it should be.
Products supporting Win32: Windows and WINE
Products supporting Qt: Windows, Mac OS X, X11, and Linux
Products supporting POSIX: *BSD, Linux, and Mac OS X
Win32 certainly doesn't look like a standard to me... it doesn't even have consistent behaviour with itself.
For your first point, Qt is available gratis under the GPL.
For your second, the government or company needs to actually hire good programmers-- and replace the person in charge of doing so, if necessary.
Qt certainly is free. Available under the GPL for Mac OS X, X11, Windows, and Linux (framebuffer).
But it is not free software.
438 is, actually.
Sharing information, however, is. And that is exactly what so-called "piracy" is being used to refer to.
Nope, he is quite right. The problem is the flawed design used by systems such as credit cards and social security for authentication. If they were designed properly, sharing information wouldn't be a problem.
It's simple-- someone is threatening your rights, you exercise those rights as much as possible.
In this case, it's the US Gov't and various corporations threatening our right to share information.