Slashdot Mirror


Forget Phishing Just Buy Personal Info

Iago writes "If you need information about a person in Moscow, just go to the market and buy it. The Globe and Mail reports that along with the usual pirated software, cd's etc. you can find out information such as the bank records of your competitors, motor vehicle information and tax returns. The question is, how much of this information is being sold in other countries, perhaps in a more sophisticated manner?"

163 comments

  1. yeah ... I like fishing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Nothing like fishing eh

  2. Known about this for years by pcmanjon · · Score: 5, Interesting

    They've been doing this for years in other countries. What most people don't realise is that most of these stories you hear about personal information/security breaches (Lexis Nexis, etc etc etc) usually goes to thugs like this.

    These thugs sell this information to people in the black market. This isn't new stuff neither, the news just seems to hover on this and "identity theft" a lot recently. It's been happening since the 80's.

  3. A better question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

    A better question is, how much of this information is real?

    1. Re:A better question by temcat · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Most of it is real, believe me. Whay fake something as big as countrywide database when you can easily bribe the right person and get the real thing. Recently there was a scandal when a Central Bank (!) database was stolen. But this is for big boys; as to the general public, stolen mobile operators databases are very popular here, because we don't have official telephone directories with personal phone numbers.

    2. Re:A better question by ciroknight · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The problem is, if *any* of it is real, then we have a problem.

      Especially recently with all of the banks coming out with information of their customers being comprimised.

      --
      "Victory means exit strategy, and it's important for the President to explain to us what the exit strategy is." G.W.Bush
    3. Re:A better question by myukew · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I don't think so, I haven't much black market experience, but I think it's much easier to fake databases than stealing them. And judging by the ratio of fake software and audio sold on such markets I would say that the chances are good to be ripped of buying such databases

    4. Re:A better question by temcat · · Score: 1

      Well, here it's easire to steal. It's RUSSIA!

      A lot of people successfully use this stuff. I personally use the address/phone database from police and mobile phone operators, and I don't know anyone who doesn't. BTW, I haven't had a single failure with it ;-) But this is just because our stupid laws don't permit to create a real phone directory...

    5. Re:A better question by smittyoneeach · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Beyond fake, one would suspect a percentage of the information is of the honeypot variety, and will lead to a knock on the door at an unreasonably early hour by some nondescript fellows with a subpoena.

      --
      Get thee glass eyes, and, like a scurvy politician, seem to see things thou dost not.--King Lear
    6. Re:A better question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In Russia, database steals YOU!

    7. Re:A better question by Cyberax · · Score: 1

      I can find my own passport number, my mobile numbers and my car's registration number in these databases. I routinely use these databases to find post addresses of my friends by their phone numbers.

      So I guess these databases are pretty correct.

    8. Re:A better question by Cyberax · · Score: 1

      Well, I've never heard about.

      Posession of such databases is not illegal, since you just bought them (of course if it isn't YOU who had stolen them in the first place).

      Of course, seller can be brought to account, but it's pretty hard to catch them.

    9. Re:A better question by smittyoneeach · · Score: 1

      My remark assumed you bought the database for the obvious reasons, and perpetrated fraud.

      --
      Get thee glass eyes, and, like a scurvy politician, seem to see things thou dost not.--King Lear
    10. Re:A better question by Cyberax · · Score: 1

      Well, you have to prove it. And how are you going to prove intentions?

      BTW: I find these databases to be quite convinient for searching for phone numbers, addresses and birthdays.

    11. Re:A better question by smittyoneeach · · Score: 1

      Well, sure, but how did you accidentally buy five homes, three cars, and a gas station under all those names? ;)

      --
      Get thee glass eyes, and, like a scurvy politician, seem to see things thou dost not.--King Lear
    12. Re:A better question by Cyberax · · Score: 1

      Well, all of the names are in that list :)

      But you can't buy anything on behalf of other people using only data in the stolen lists. Mostly because every bank and shop in Russia is aware of the stolen lists.

  4. That old saying... by KerberosKing · · Score: 1

    Why buy the cow when you can have the milk for free? Phishers/Pharmers will still steal things rather than pay for them. Besides, like it says in the article, the illicit databases are compiled from data stolen by hackers, so it's just another layer in the cake of computer crime.

    1. Re:That old saying... by teksno · · Score: 1

      well why not steal it, use it, and sell it...you get what you want and you make a bit on the side to the inept phishers that haxor your mghz to get your info... thats what i do...er....would do... isnt that right jason mitchell, 5425 34th st apt 12105 san francisco ca 94014...

      btw where are the soviet russia jokes... i read 9 posts when i posted this, and none of them started "in soviet russia..." i know people typicall dislike them here, but can you really think of a more approite story...

    2. Re:That old saying... by John_Renne · · Score: 1

      It's not only the idea that phising / pharming is free, the data just might be more accurate. I know from my own habbits I'm not too happy to provide personal information on websites where it's easy to be harvested. On the other hand if a piece of malware is distributing the info while I'm not aware of it, it just might be more accurate

      --
      /(bb|[^b]{2})/
    3. Re:That old saying... by jrockway · · Score: 3, Funny

      Sorry to hear about your shift key.

      Also, I like how you can't put a period after "St." but can end every sentence with ... three periods. You only need one! ;)

      --
      My other car is first.
    4. Re:That old saying... by Deliveranc3 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Don't put, commas in your sentences.

      That, you could say, brings on the grammar Nazis :P

    5. Re:That old saying... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Sorry to burst your bubble, but the comma in his sentence is grammatically correct.

    6. Re:That old saying... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      You sir, are a dumbass cum laude. Please masturbate in your eyes so you go blind. Before that, kill your parents so that may never ever procreate again to bring an abomination like you into the world ever again. Please die. Thanks.

    7. Re:That old saying... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      wasn't Layer Cake (er, i mean L4yer Cake) meant to be a pretty good film?
      as for the id stuff, well there're plenty of big companies whose sole purpose is collection and selling-on of personal data, such as credit history, full name, address, telephone number, spending habits and so on.
      This is the main reason i'm dead against the UK's proposed id cards. I simply don't trust whichever crappy company they award the contract to not to sell all my details to a bunch of criminals. And by criminals i mean real criminals i.e. aside from jokes about banks and other credit card issuers

    8. Re:That old saying... by chadbailey · · Score: 1

      You are dumb. Shut up.

  5. Disinformation? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    A massive flood of fake information would dilute the value of stolen i.d. right?

    1. Re:Disinformation? by Jackie_Chan_Fan · · Score: 1

      very good point, and perhaps a tactic in full effect

    2. Re:Disinformation? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A massive flood of fake information...

      Hopefully, phishers will not think of using a new technology called a program that tries every input, including the good and bad. If they discover this technology, then your solution will not work.

    3. Re:Disinformation? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have an infinite supply of bad data. Go ahead and test all you want.

    4. Re:Disinformation? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your ability to generate bad data is resource constrained, not the least by bandwidth and CPU power. Further, your ability to generate convincing random data is dubious. (If you think you can generate random user information in infinite quantities, then please provide a proof or reference algorithm. I can guarantee that an attacker can come up with a probabilistic check that performs better than .5 ROC.)

      So, at best, the chaffe data approach merely affects the rate at which good data is exploited by the criminals. Since their cost is zero (they're using compromised computers to perform the processing, by the way), this is hardly an effective strategy.

    5. Re:Disinformation? by lifeblender · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Not at all. It would increase the value of trusted stolen ID information. In the end, it would just make thieves use more sophisticated social networks, etc. They'd get around it, and would be willing to pay more for real data, since the work that went into collecting it and verifying it was greater.

      To sum up, it's still supply and demand, and you're talking about diluting the supply. That means that, for those who can get at the 'good stuff', it's worth more.

      On the other hand, if the FBI and the credit card companies were to engage in honey-net operations, then we're talking.

      On a related note, I just got a note from my credit card company saying that I could make a temporary credit card number for online purchases. Seems like things are looking up, if only a bit.

      --
      Playing pornographics games during the day is evil! Play at night!
    6. Re:Disinformation? by Corpus_Callosum · · Score: 1

      This is a fairly good idea, actually, and I actively do this myself to throw off data mining programs. The basic idea is, always fill out surveys and any other demographic feedback forms whenever you can with completely fake and contradictory (but positive) information. With enough confusion associated with your digital identity, you become less likely to be singled out for anything as you will not fit basic marketing or actuarial profiles (be it from legitimate sources or not).

      --
      The reason that it can be true that 1+1 > 2 is that very peculiar nonzero value of the + operator
  6. You need info by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    you need your social, call me 555-5555

    1. Re:You need info by Tonik,+the · · Score: 0, Troll

      My home phone number is 555-7733, and yes it's real. Moscow, Russia.

      Few, oh so few slashdotters can figure out the country and city code so I'm not afraid of posting it here.

    2. Re:You need info by Hogwash+McFly · · Score: 1

      That sounds like a challenge. You heard him boys, let the Arnold soundboarding commence!

      --
      Mother, do you think they'll like this sig?
  7. What, /.? You don't like it? by chocolatetrumpet · · Score: 4, Funny

    But, I thought information wants to be free?

    --
    Spoon not. Fork, or fork not. There is no spoon.
    1. Re:What, /.? You don't like it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah... that's why we're pissed that someone's charging money for it!

      - Yogix

    2. Re:What, /.? You don't like it? by RAMMS+EIN · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Yes. If this information were Free, at least we would be more aware of what was happening. And criminals wouldn't be getting paid for it. This way, the criminals and the people with money benefit.

      I personally don't think I care if my and everyone else's "personal" information becomes public. I don't think there is anything extremely interesting about it. People already find out my phone number, email address, street address, bank account number, sometimes even credit card number, user name, real name, etc. etc. etc. as it is.

      All that said, I don't think it's necessary to make all everything publicly accessible. It does open the door to more fraud (although it can also help catch fraudsters more easily!), spam, etc. So let's say that public information wants to be free, and private information wants to stay private?

      --
      Please correct me if I got my facts wrong.
    3. Re:What, /.? You don't like it? by Sique · · Score: 1

      Yes... keep that in mind. Every information wants to be free. And if you compile a lot of information in a database, this information is likely to leak further. It's like herding sheep. Some of the sheep are bound to get lost eventually.

      --
      .sig: Sique *sigh*
    4. Re:What, /.? You don't like it? by mstefanus · · Score: 1

      Well RTFA, its not free; you have to buy it.

    5. Re:What, /.? You don't like it? by Jesus_666 · · Score: 1

      Why can't we just use decent modificators? I declare some of my information public and only me and my children (yeah, right) can access it. Or I restrict usage to everyone in the same package as me.
      Then again, importing biz.booksellers.amazon.* might unnecessarily bloat my package... but it's still better than declaring all of my information as public.

      --
      USE HOT GRITS WITH STATUE OF NATALIE PORTMAN (NAKED AND PETRIFIED)
    6. Re:What, /.? You don't like it? by telecsan · · Score: 2, Funny

      Then again, importing biz.booksellers.amazon.* might unnecessarily bloat my package

      So that's how all the 'enlarge your organ' products I see advertised work....

    7. Re:What, /.? You don't like it? by Jesus_666 · · Score: 1

      You, sir, have just made my day. +5, Funny.

      --
      USE HOT GRITS WITH STATUE OF NATALIE PORTMAN (NAKED AND PETRIFIED)
  8. Isn't it scary? by Quentusrex · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Doesn't it scare all of you that this has been happening for so long already? I'm not saying there is much we can do about it, but it's still scary.

    Now think about the databases the FBI and the airport security are keeping about you. Not only that but also the ones K-Mart, Wal-Mart, Target, Giant(foods), and other stores. It shouldn't be too hard to be you. Just find out your address, and jump on Google maps. Find the nearest stores to you. With your name and address find out your shopping history. And expand from there.

    And you thought with all the political speech out there that you might actually be safe in the USA. I'll be happy being Anonymous, until I choose to be known.

    1. Re:Isn't it scary? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You'll be happy being Anonymous? Why you go to the University of Washington in Seattle. You are into Aristotle, and 3D rendering on your computer. You have Comcast broadband. You've recently been thinking about a LISP/MPI cluster of Linux AMD machines.

      It's more than just databases being stolen. Even I'm not anonymous in some log right now. It's how hard you dig.

    2. Re:Isn't it scary? by HangingChad · · Score: 1
      Now think about the databases the FBI and the airport security are keeping about you.

      Not sure I'd worry as much about them. The FBI computer systems aren't as sophisticated as people seem to think. The danger from them is the type of information they have access to in other systems. And the ability to aggregate that information into a file supplemented by direct observation. That's what the real brewha with the Patriot Act is all about. The FBI's ability to do that without judicial oversight. The prospect for abuse is some political lackey like Karl Rove using the FBI as a political tool to investigate and intimidate political opposition.

      TSA's data systems have the potential to be far more incidious but they're going too many directions at once to be really dangerous yet...hence incidents like Senator Kennedy turning up on a no fly list.

      Individual companies tend to guard their customer data instead of share it. The real dangerous organizations imho are companies like ChoicePoint, LexisNexis and the credit reporting agencies. They are operating largely without government oversight and very few regulatory limitations on what they can keep about you and how long.

      It would be interesting to find out if there was a market for privacy services. Not to hide from law enforcement but a company designed to keep the legal purchases and shopping habits of their customers out of places like ChoicePoint. I'm guessing the market would be very small. Most people just don't seem to care about privacy all that much.

      --
      That's our life, the big wheel of shit. - The Fat Man, Blue Tango Salvage
  9. Because as a wise person once said... by truckaxle · · Score: 5, Funny

    Sell a man a phish he can scam for a day, but teach him how to phish and he can scam for himself for a lifetime.

    1. Re:Because as a wise person once said... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sell a man a phish he can scam for a day, but teach him how to phish and he can scam for himself for a lifetime.

      Not bad. But I always preferred:

      Build a man a fire, and he will be warm for a night. Set a man on fire, and he will be warm for the rest of his life...

    2. Re:Because as a wise person once said... by lolocaust · · Score: 1

      lol @ "person". politically correctism.

      --
      Why does my post history abruptly stop? I want to laugh at the stupid things I posted as a kid.
    3. Re:Because as a wise person once said... by roman_mir · · Score: 1

      Oh yes, the wise guy on /. with this signature? :

      Sell a man a phish and he cans scam for a day, teach him how to phish and you just gave up your monopoly on phisheries!

  10. MOD PARENT UP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    One of the definitions of a business is an organization that can choose who gets the limited resources. Businesses want to keep their stuff private/limited when they want to just like individuals do.

  11. Buy from gangster, get burnt by Willeh · · Score: 4, Interesting
    Yeah right, and what's to say this information is actually valuable? TFA says that at least some of it is, but just like bulk email lists there's bound to be a lot of chaff in all of it, due to natural entropy of data, etc etc.

    And it's not like these lists ever get refreshed much, so what you end up with is increasingly less useful data in these lists, and the vendors don't even care about it. It's just the nature of the beast (and the overall state of former Russia, where anything goes).

    --
    Will wank off Linus Torvalds for fame.
    1. Re:Buy from gangster, get burnt by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      AFAIK, it's still Russia.

    2. Re:Buy from gangster, get burnt by Peeteriz · · Score: 3, Interesting

      The things you can buy in Moscow market are the real thing - Russian IRS database, with the income information as accurate as the authorites have it, the living addresses are the ones that the police use, etc.

      If it says 'Tax returns 2003', then it really is the tax returns, as they were for 2003, complete with the ability to easily search for, say, addresses and family relationships of persons in your neighbourhood with more than 100,000$ income last year.

    3. Re:Buy from gangster, get burnt by RAMMS+EIN · · Score: 3, Funny

      ...and the overall state of former Russia...

      Dude! When did the revolution happen? I'd better go and update my little database here.

      Are you sure about your sig? ;-)

      --
      Please correct me if I got my facts wrong.
    4. Re:Buy from gangster, get burnt by Willeh · · Score: 1

      I'm afraid i'm gonna have to fine you some karma credits for using facts before 1pm on a thursday, on SLASHDOT not less.

      --
      Will wank off Linus Torvalds for fame.
    5. Re:Buy from gangster, get burnt by KaptNKrunchy · · Score: 1

      On the other side of it though, the next time that the Kremlin wants to make someone vanish, and erase them completely from the public records, there will still be millions of copies of the original records floating around.

    6. Re:Buy from gangster, get burnt by FidelCatsro · · Score: 1

      These Gangsters will defiantly sell you the real thing . If they sell you a fake then they will earn a reputation and lose a lot of business , and if they sell that false information to someone of equal criminal intent then they run a very high risk of a punishment beating or a hit.
      Simple as that , so you can pretty much guarantee that they are selling genuine information , they are mostly selling it to people with equally dubious morals .
      they're no small fry scam artists job nor grifters , these are major organised criminal syndicates

      --
      The only things certain in war are Propaganda and Death. You can never be sure which is which though
    7. Re:Buy from gangster, get burnt by MochaMan · · Score: 1

      I'm sure it's real...

      I mean, if this was a scam someone would have turned the sellers in to the cops for false advertising by now. The market takes care of this kind of thing itself.

      *cough*

    8. Re:Buy from gangster, get burnt by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Come on. Been there, seen this. This info is heavily outdated. People earn money to make an investigation and nobody will sell you the source of his income.

  12. Another example of security through obscurity. by Behrooz · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The question is, how much of this information is being sold in other countries, perhaps in a more sophisticated manner?

    All of it, of course. Sooner or later we're going to have to get used to the idea that the concept of preserving privacy as a society disproportionately benefits individuals and groups with the resources to acquire and disseminate information regardless of the obstacles in their way.

    It's too late to save privacy as most people currently envision it. What we need to be doing as a society is focus on transparency and equality-- ensuring that all parties in the social contract stand on an equal footing with regard to what information is publicly available. Secrecy is most dangerous when the powers that be insist that it be one-sided...

    --
    "We have to go forth and crush every world view that doesn't believe in tolerance and free speech." - David Brin
    1. Re:Another example of security through obscurity. by telecsan · · Score: 1

      Wow...I first read this as

      "All of it, of course. Sooner or later we're going to have to get used to the idea that the concept of preserving piracy as a society disproportionately benefits individuals and groups with the resources to acquire and disseminate information regardless of the obstacles in their way."

      Gives the sentence a whole different meaning, doesn't it. And then...

      "It's too late to save piracy as most people currently envision it. What we need to be doing as a society is focus on transparency and equality-- ensuring that all parties in the social contract stand on an equal footing with regard to what information is publicly available. Secrecy is most dangerous when the powers that be insist that it be one-sided..."

      That could have been an actual slashdot post on any random article about the RIAA...

  13. It's just going to get worse by The+Slaughter · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I think this has always been around, but with the proliferation of the digital era, it becomes easier to make a thousand copies of something.
    Look at medical records, it used to take a few minutes while they looked for your chart. At the medical clinic I currently go to they can locate you instantly. When you go into the doctor's office, he has your information on-screen. If something like a patient's chart goes missing, there's physical evidence that it's gone. But if a computer is poorly secured, you may not ever realized it was compromised.
    What really bothers me is who is purchasing this information. My medical records would be pretty harmless to most people, but what if a coworker with a grudge were to find out about a deadly allergy I have? There's always that scary potential you don't necessarily think about. What if a terrorist uses your identity to get into the country and commit nefarious deeds? Could you be imprisoned while they go free?

    1. Re:It's just going to get worse by RAMMS+EIN · · Score: 4, Insightful

      ``What if a terrorist uses your identity to get into the country and commit nefarious deeds? Could you be imprisoned while they go free?''

      With the current paranoia, definitely. It's better to be safe than sorry, so let's send back that plane that has someone on board who might be a terrorist (and, after all, anybody could be a terrorist), and let's keep these people safely locked up without a trial, until maybe someday we have some evidence against them, or perhaps for them.

      Seriously. The principle that you're innocent until proven guilty is a healthy one. There's also a reason this has to be proven in front of a judge. These people are trained to be impartial, and to spot weaknesses in the argumentation and evidence on both sides. People in general are easily swayed, especially with media influence.

      Now, to return to your issue about computers, that's a very good point, and highlights an important problem. People think computers don't make mistakes, and information that is stored there and backed up is safe. Both of these are pretty much correct. However, that does not mean that what comes out of a computer is correct in any sense. People still make mistakes when entering information, and I think we here all know how sad a state computer security is in.

      Especially falsification of information from inside is a very real threat. In most applications I have seen, this leaves no traces unless you want it to. Very different from handwritten information, where it's easy to see that something was written by a different person, and investigation may even reveal who that person is. If not by the handwriting, then by the fingerprints.

      Many of these fallbacks are simply not available in computer systems, and with computers being the backbone of virtually everything organized, I think we ought to be really concerned. And, I might add, the fact that most of these are running known faulty software and operated by non-computer-savvy people does not make it any better. Nor does the fact that the workings of said faulty software are hidden.

      --
      Please correct me if I got my facts wrong.
    2. Re:It's just going to get worse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Although the points the above poster makes, in general are valid, wanted to point out that medical records in particular are protected by HIPAA and there is a liability on the healthcare provider if that info is leaked out/sold by them.

      IMHO what's needed is legislation that will put the cost of privacy compromises on the entities that are best situated to prevent those compromises, namely businesses. The current sad state of affairs comes, of course, because businesses have no incentive to appoint a chief information security officer, absent a board-justifiable downside from the occasional loss of customers' information.

  14. not only in Russia by Mrs.+Grundy · · Score: 4, Insightful

    What is going on in Russia IS a little scary, but is it really any different that buying the same information from one the businesses operating in the US like choicepoint? The government and industry buys information from HUGE databases legally here in the united states, but for some reason people make it seem scarier when it is a Russian kiosk instead of an american corporation even though both exercise about the same amount of restraint and ethics concerning to whom they will sell information.

    1. Re:not only in Russia by skreeech · · Score: 1

      the american companies usually don't sell your information to burly men named boris and ivan who are planning to kick in your door and put guns to your house as they rob you. I find publishers clearing house sweepstakes and other junk mail to be a much smaller annoyance.

      --
      [20:36] wwwdot/.dotorg
    2. Re:not only in Russia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But.. but... Russians are communists! /. must fight them!

    3. Re:not only in Russia by Blastrogath · · Score: 2, Insightful

      the american companies usually don't sell your information to burly men named boris and ivan who are planning to kick in your door and put guns to your house as they rob you. I find publishers clearing house sweepstakes and other junk mail to be a much smaller annoyance.

      "burly men named boris and ivan" can buy your information in the US, all they have to do is hire a lawyer to buy it for them via a corporation the lawer made. Americans are safe from widespread home invasion robberies because they have an efective police force and a country with a history of relitive domestic peace and tranquility.

      --
      "The price good men pay for indifference to public affairs is to be ruled by evil men." -Plato
    4. Re:not only in Russia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Americans are safe from widespread home invasion robberies because they have an efective police force and a country with a history of relitive domestic peace and tranquility.

      That right to bear arms thing helps too.

    5. Re:not only in Russia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      much different costs effect availibility

    6. Re:not only in Russia by 4of12 · · Score: 1

      What is going on in Russia IS a little scary, but is it really any different that buying the same information from one the businesses operating in the US like choicepoint?

      It is different - slightly.

      In Russia, information is manufactured so that their kangaroo courts can convict slightly shady characters like Mikhail Khodorkovsky on different artificial trumped-up charges.

      In the USA, Choicepoint is contracted to manufacture a suspiciously faulty system and a trumped up list of "felons" to be barred from voting in a critically contested election in a critically contested state.

      But you are right: in both countries information is used to manufacture artificial felons for political and monetary gain.

      --
      "Provided by the management for your protection."
    7. Re:not only in Russia by Blastrogath · · Score: 1

      Not realy. Look at any number of african, asian or south american nations where guns are available to anyone: they don't have domestic peace and tranquility.

      The right to bear arms as a militia protects you from the govenment, not criminals.

      A good government writting good and fair laws, a culture that doesn't put up with criminal behavior, and competent honest police is what will protect you from crime.

      Apathetic citezens, unjust laws, or corrupt police all lead to crime.

      Do your part: look out for your fellow man, pay close atention to who you're voting for(if you're a voter), and try to help or reform your local police (whichever is more apropriate.)

      --
      "The price good men pay for indifference to public affairs is to be ruled by evil men." -Plato
  15. greeting from mother russia by CloudDrakken · · Score: 1, Funny

    I am curious with the wonder of when someone is think the contents will from mother russia be on the wikipedias,

    I am in need of some friendshipful cashmonies

  16. I'm not surprised by Underholdning · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The rule of thumb is: Do not worry about the means of transport, but the destination.
    In other words - don't worry if the encryption used to send the data is 128 bit or 1024. No one will bother try to sniff'n'hack it anyways. Worry about whom you're giving your info to. Sure - they may have cheap DVD's, but in order to sell you cheap goods, they must save money in other areas. Security is (sadly) one of the first things to go.

    1. Re:I'm not surprised by Peeteriz · · Score: 1

      You cannot not give your financial information to government tax authorities - if their databases get sold, as it is happening in Russia, it's not like you can choose an 'alternate provider'

  17. not just Moscow by Ingvar77 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    In every major Russian city you can obtain almost for free a database with phone numbers(including cell), addresses, car registry and pasports for all citizens of this city.
    Even more, it's hard to find a PC in my own city that doesn't have a "Megapolice" database, which contains all above information accessible throught a single easy-to-use interface.

  18. Everything has its price. by Shag · · Score: 3, Funny
    The question is, how much of this information is being sold in other countries, perhaps in a more sophisticated manner?
    The answer to that question is available... for a price. ;)
    --
    Village idiot in some extremely smart villages.
  19. In soviet Russia... by bloblu · · Score: 2, Interesting

    ...at least corruption was organized. I'm afraid nowadays Russia is just a big mess. You can't expect anything else.

    Anyway, I guess that these days you better have nothing to hide.

  20. Old News by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Walk into any telemarketing office and you'll find people's information that has been bought. In the shadier ones, you'll find lead sheets with SS numbers, bank account numbers, credit card numbers, etc. Sure some of the people are "suckers" (term used to describe people who've bought from telemarketers before), but a lot of them are stolen from the internet.

  21. Grammar? by noidentity · · Score: 3, Funny

    Forget grammar just stick words together see like this isn't that easy

    1. Re:Grammar? by noidentity · · Score: 1

      s/grammar/punctuation # argh

  22. India by romit_icarus · · Score: 3, Informative

    It's being sold in India. I've met "vendors" who do the round of direct marketing agencies peddling CDs for information. The last I checked, about a year ago, a data CD came for 10c/record...

  23. With all this Phishing in the news... by Tink2000 · · Score: 3, Funny

    I've given a lot of thought to the subject lately, and really, I've decided I don't care much. In fact, I honestly believe that anyone who stole my identity would after a quick perusal of what they've stolen feel guilty and probably credit me a couple of hundred bucks or so.

    Hey, you can't steal what isn't there, and my credit is already wrecked beyond belief. You'd have to be a pretty desperate scammer to steal my identity.

    1. Re:With all this Phishing in the news... by failedlogic · · Score: 1

      I'm sure you would miss having your Slashdot Karma stolen, right? ;)

    2. Re:With all this Phishing in the news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, if you read my journal entries, you'll notice that I don't really think it matters ... 5 years and only got to mod once. Bleh. Although (as you can tell by me posting AC) I don't take a whole lot of chances as it is. *shrugs helplessly*

  24. At what point do we as humans learn? by Jackie_Chan_Fan · · Score: 1

    Just curious when we'll actually stop bleeding our personal info to foreign nations?

    How about security?

    Its pretty scary when you realize we were once at war with Russia. Nuclear stand offs... spys... tight security....

    Just how tight was that security?

    It seems to me that either there never was security, or we're just getting so lazy about protecting ourselves.

    The hellish nightmare that one must go through when having their info stolen... is too much of a burden on the victom. It is not right that we continue to hand over info to unknowns.

  25. Re:In Soviet Russia... by smokeslikeapoet · · Score: 2, Funny

    NO, NO, NO, it's

    In Soviet Russia you buy your own information.

    Equifax
    Transunion
    Experian

    Unless you consider once a year access acceptable. Your credit report free. But that's only once a year.

    Who's information is it anyway?

  26. in soviet russia, ... by imess · · Score: 0, Redundant

    i can already see this joke coming...

  27. Miene Final Solution by HyoImowano · · Score: 2, Funny

    Live in the woods in a shack, no computer, no TV, no stereo, just you, the chickens, the cows, your banjo, and Deliverance. Que creepy hillbilly guitar riff.

    --
    By now you should have guessed...I'm your magic negro.
    1. Re:Miene Final Solution by Frodo+Crockett · · Score: 3, Funny

      You forgot the sheep. It gets lonely out in the woods.

      --
      "The newly born animals are then whisked off for a quick run through a giant baking oven." --heard on Food Network
    2. Re:Miene Final Solution by HyoImowano · · Score: 0

      No, that's only in Ireland.

      (See: War of the Buttons)

      --
      By now you should have guessed...I'm your magic negro.
  28. "Private Eye" CD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    A few years ago in Israel a CDROM started circulating with information about more-or-less the entire population. The database was probably leaked from the Ministry of Interior. It was originally used by a private investigations firm but a copy leaked and started circulating freely.

    IMHO, once it's out there it's everyone's civil duty to get a copy, just to level the playing field.

    1. Re:"Private Eye" CD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      A few years ago in Israel a CDROM started circulating with information about more-or-less the entire population

      Wrong. This database leaked only once - in 1994. The information contained in it, is relevant to that period. How many people have moved since? Also, it has glaring gaps - some completely random people are missing from the database. Most important, it contains no financial or medical information.

      The database was probably leaked from the Ministry of Interior.

      Wrong. It was attested that the database is one that is provided to all parties during an election, as a means to contact the population, and therefore contains only limited information. A friend of mine who once volunteered at one such party told me at the time that these CDs were all over the office, with no one bothering to keep an eye on them, which is enough explanation to determine how it was "leaked."

      once it's out there it's everyone's civil duty to get a copy, just to level the playing field

      Actually, having this database in your possession is a criminal offense and is punishable by a fine and up to several years in prison. Nonetheless, it can be found circulating on major P2P networks. The whole thing is simply an 800MB access file.

  29. In Solviet Russia.... by martian67 · · Score: 1

    Database maintains YOU!

    1. Re:In Solviet Russia.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      people know how to spll.

      Oops, nevermind.

  30. People can be bought, too by The+Slaughter · · Score: 2, Insightful

    You're right. There's definately cause for concern - there are now so many weak spots in the system. A lot of people with access to these important databases are making less than $10/hr. If you find the right person, $15,000 would get you whatever information or passwords you need - or worse, making changes in records or deleting information.
    It happens too with corporate espionage. Somebody at the help desk might be convinced to hand over the CEO's email account password to a competitor. If I've got $15,000 and find the right person, can I get your name on a terrorist watch list?

    1. Re:People can be bought, too by slashdot-me · · Score: 1

      $15,000? That's a year's salary for your hypothetical guy making $10/hr. $500 would do the trick, probably less.

    2. Re:People can be bought, too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      its 22k thank you and yes I do have your password

  31. Buying Personal Info, U.S. Style by divide+overflow · · Score: 4, Interesting


    The easiest way to buy personal information here in the U.S. is to set up a fake company, then request the desired information from one of the major credit bureaus: Experian, Equifax, TransUnion, or ChoicePoint. Back in February ChoicePoint admitted to releasing the information on at least 145,000 consumers to fake companies.

    1. Re:Buying Personal Info, U.S. Style by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unfortunately for any idiot trying to do so, ChoicePoint now requires a minimum of 2 years for any business that is trying to get in with them. I've tried, because I too am interested in selling these records and they turned me down for being 'too new', or in other words 'somebody wanting to steal data'.

    2. Re:Buying Personal Info, U.S. Style by corblix · · Score: 1
      The easiest way to buy personal information here in the U.S. is to set up a fake company, then request the desired information from one of the major credit bureaus ....

      Question: What is the difference between a "real company" and a "fake company"?
      Answer: Nothing.

      Just a thought.

    3. Re:Buying Personal Info, U.S. Style by divide+overflow · · Score: 1

      > Unfortunately for any idiot trying to do so, ChoicePoint now requires a minimum of 2 years for any business that is trying to get in with them. I've tried, because I too am interested in selling these records and they turned me down for being 'too new', or in other words 'somebody wanting to steal data'.

      It doesn't take too much effort to find a way around that limitation. I'm not going to say how to do it as I don't want to lower the barrier to entry and make it any easier for those less creative minds among use. I'll just say it doesn't take a criminal mastermind. :)

    4. Re:Buying Personal Info, U.S. Style by eno2001 · · Score: 1

      Simple:

      Real company = Does something worthwhile for its customers and makes sure to keep them happy by bending over backwards for them.

      Fake Company = Some crook who puts out a shingle claiming to offer something ostensibly worthwhile, but offering nothing worthwhile. Usually results in a lot of angry customers if there is some kind of product. However, in actuality, the fake company rarely offers anything at all and just abuses its status to serve it's own interests.

      Really easy to comprehend if you aren't a dishonest scum sucking son of a bitch bastard. You're welcome. :)

      --
      -"...bad old ideas look confusingly fresh when they are packaged as technology" - Jaron Lanier (Digital Maoism on Edge.o
    5. Re:Buying Personal Info, U.S. Style by corblix · · Score: 1
      Really easy to comprehend if you aren't a dishonest scum sucking son of a bitch bastard

      Easy to comprehend, but not easy to check. Also rather ambiguous. (By your definition and my opinion, MCI is a "fake company", for example; but I doubt a court of law would agree.) Furthermore, there is no legal difference between the two. Thus, a plan to keep personal info out of the bad guys' hands by not giving it to "fake companies" is doomed to failure.

  32. What is unusual about this? by dan+dan+the+dna+man · · Score: 4, Interesting

    In the UK I've had the ... pleasure (?) ... of knowing some exceedingly dodgy people with very good technical skills. This information has been available to criminals with the requistite amount of cash as long as hackers (sorry crackers) decided they could make a fast buck doing companies rather than pootling around insecure university networks.

    Nothing new here and it certianly isn't limited to dodgy stalls in Moscow markets or corrupt outsourced callcentre employees.

    --
    I don't read your sig, why do you read mine?
  33. Re:In soviet Russia... by RAMMS+EIN · · Score: 1

    Which raises another scary issue. Stolen personal data is not that much of an issue. But what's happening to all those nukes that the soviet union built? I assume they are taking care of them as best they can, but how well is that? What about the ones in other countries, where the president may not be as powerful as Putin? Or what about more remote parts of russia, where people are secretly carrying out their own schemes behind Putin's back?

    --
    Please correct me if I got my facts wrong.
  34. In Soviet Russia... by Rastan_B2 · · Score: 0, Redundant

    fish phish you!

  35. forget punctuation just use run-on sentences by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    nt.

  36. Re:In soviet Russia... by jacen_sunstrider · · Score: 2, Funny

    I completely thought the title of the parent was leading up into a "In Soviet Russia, information phishes you!

  37. Forget Punctuation Just Write Run-On Sentences by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's what the cool kids are doing, anyway.

  38. I hate to disappoint you by plaxion · · Score: 3, Funny

    ...but there aren't enough moderation points available in the /. system to stave off the flow of bad "In Soviet Russia..." _AND_ "PROFIT!" jokes that are going to flood in from this one.

    If you think you have a good one, please save someone a mod point by keeping it to yourself, because if it isn't already redundant, it soon will be.

    This message brought to you by the Moderator Points Association of America (MPAA) *ducks*

    --
    I'm commenting on this story to prevent myself from burning moderator points on useless comments like this one ;)

    1. Re:I hate to disappoint you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was about to mod you up, but then that would probably dispappoint you.... ;)

  39. Trolling 101 by Jesus_666 · · Score: 1

    In corporate America, certain organizations are corrupt.
    In soviet Russia, corruption certainly was organized.

    See, wasn't that easy?

    --
    USE HOT GRITS WITH STATUE OF NATALIE PORTMAN (NAKED AND PETRIFIED)
  40. Offtopic ! by Peeteriz · · Score: 1

    The article and the databases there are about the personal information of Russian residents (well, including Americans who live there), not some outsourcing mishap.

  41. personal data by chrisranjana.com · · Score: 0

    That's really bad news for the security !

    --
    Chris ,
    Php Programmers.
  42. Re:In Soviet Russia... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    OMG THAT IS SO FUNNY

    Check out that slahdot site on that World Wide Web thing, I bet they'd just love that one.

    Wow! So original and witty! Wow!

  43. Ransom Want Ads by Valacosa · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Though this is only alluded to in the article, one of the greatest dangers is using information like this as an ransom hit-list. If you could abduct the kids of the ten richest people in Moscow, odds are at least one of them would pay up...

    Things like that are depressingly common in some parts of the world.

    --
    "Live as if you'll die tomorrow." Ridiculous. You could die later today.
  44. Go Ahead... I'll sell it to you by panth0r · · Score: 0

    After student loans and other such fiscal treasures, I'd be happy to sell my identity to one of these places that sells it to other people... so, where do I sign up?

    --
    I like suggestions, but I don't like contributing towards them.
  45. in Soviet Russia ... by constantnormal · · Score: 1

    ... rope will hang you!

    The Capitalists will sell us the rope with which we will hang them.
    -- Vladimir Ilyich Lenin

  46. Off-topic but by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Off topic but important - bombings in London - so far 3 bus bombs and bombings in the tube reported.

    1. Re:Off-topic but by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just goes to show how dubya and his british clone are winning the war on terror...how many more countries will get invaded this time?

    2. Re:Off-topic but by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Our thoughts and prayers are with you in this tragic hour.

    3. Re:Off-topic but by narkotix · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      bbc is having a hard time http://www.bbc.co.uk.nyud.net:8090/

      --
      We played dungeons and dragons for 3 hours.....then i was slain by an elf
    4. Re:Off-topic but by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's been also said not to take the Eurostar at the moment.

  47. Well, I hope by SimianOverlord · · Score: 3, Funny

    that they haven't scammed detail from places like say, the NYTimes subsriber database. "Mr A Butthole, Kansas" and "Phil McCrackin, Washington" might find unwanted junk mail winging their way towards them.

    --
    Meine Schwester ist sehr, sehr reizvoll - Nietzsche
  48. Obligatory "In Soviet Russia..." joke by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    IN SOVIET RUSSIA, PERSONAL INFORMATION BUYS YOU!

    (Don't complain. If I didn't say it, someone else would. Seriously, its like a government regulation or something.)

    1. Re:Obligatory "In Soviet Russia..." joke by xerxesdaphat · · Score: 2, Funny

      Information just wants to be free!!!

      --
      The Shoes of the Fisherman's Wife Are Some Jive Ass Slippers
    2. Re:Obligatory "In Soviet Russia..." joke by Aardpig · · Score: 1

      Don't complain. If I didn't say it, someone else would.

      Yes, but they would have made it funny. Or even mildly humourous.

      --
      Tubal-Cain smokes the white owl.
  49. "Multiple blasts paralyse London" (OT) by nmg196 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Looks like there have been explosions at five London tube stations and on at least one bus:

    http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/4659093.stm

  50. It's /., the bombings were the acts of by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Microsoft.

  51. Re:LONDON GETS HIT BY TERROR!!!! by muszek · · Score: 0, Offtopic
  52. Re:LONDON GETS HIT BY TERROR!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    here! here!

    all that agree, say "i"

  53. Re:LONDON GETS HIT BY TERROR!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah, but the terrorists need Bush and Blair or there would be no one to fight against. Just like Bush and Blair need the terrorists. It's a circular setup.

  54. Australian Hotline Number by Bad+to+the+Ben · · Score: 1

    Australia Slashdotters: call the DFAT hotline on 1300 555 135 to check on any friends or relatives you might have in London.

  55. Don't forget offshored databases by btarval · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Probably a good deal of it. While the article focused on Russia, another recent article showed how easy it was to get the personal information of people from databases which had been offshored.

    $100 (even Canadian) per CD is a worthy amount of money in Russia or other second/third world countries where back-office operations have been off-shored to. This problem is only going to keep growing at these price levels.

    The point here is that there is very strong incentive to provide accurate data at these price levels, competition being what it will be.

    --
    The best way to predict the future is to create it. - Peter Drucker.
  56. all day every day by spoonyfork · · Score: 2, Informative

    The question is, how much of this information is being sold in other countries, perhaps in a more sophisticated manner?

    USian? Go get your free credit report. Look closely at who has recently requested it. They're getting all kinds of information about you. Your bank, credit card company, mobile phone provider, broadband provider, power company, pretty much anyone with your name addy and social security number can sell your info to be requested by someone else at any time. This is a perfectly legal and legit practice. Regarding other countries, these businesses who outsource IT to India/China/Russia will locally all have this information to trade on the white and black market where there are even less data privacy laws.

    I used to worry about identity theft and related crimes. I used to think I was the one in control and had the responsibility of securing my personal information. No, the companies that trade on personal info and credit have the control and the toothpaste is out of the tube. I can never secure the last 30 years of my information again, so why bother trying? All I can do is be vigilant in trying to detect fraud and deal with it on a case by case basis.

    There is too much commerce at stake for governments to pass laws to ensure data privacy or make issuing credit more secure. Stop whining and start making arguments to your local politicians for doing what you want to be done.

    --
    Speak truth to power.
  57. Where I come from... by AtlanticGiraffe · · Score: 1

    ...the government is a key player in this market. They keep a database of peoples names, addresses, age, spouses, children, number of people in household and that kind of stuff and they sell queries to this database. If you want to target single mothers whose children are aged 4-8, just contact an authorized reseller and get a list of names with addresses. They don't allow targeting children under 6 months though.

    P.S. This is in Iceland.

  58. Forget Commas by Karl+Tacheron · · Score: 1

    Forget commas who needs 'em

  59. Old trick with new methods by Peyote+Pekka · · Score: 4, Informative
    The difference is that since the 80's it is much easier. Personal data on Windows servers has made getting personal data that much easier. Doing that and connecting it to the Internet is just asking for a gross- or willful-negligence lawsuit. Take the case of the recent Mastercard incident: (sorry, link in Finnish)

    People burned by that one could go for a class action lawsuit against either Mastercard their service supplier or the software vendor or a combination. There's no excuse for using tools known to be defective in a networked context.

    Increasingly that said same vendor has been associated with breaches of security and failures. A year ago it was voting machines now this...

  60. Open Source then why not Open Information by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When we can have Open Source what is so wrong with having Open Information?

    In a way these guys are following the GNU principles. You can sell the information but you also need to give away the complete source. Once you have the information you can use it on any number of machines.

  61. Is anyone suprised by this? by blankmeyer · · Score: 1

    Seriously, is anyone actually surprised by this story? I mean you have to figure that criminal organizations worldwide would traffic personal information in this manner. I'd imagine you could go into any major city and find a place to by such data at cheap prices (Ok, maybe not quite that cheap, but cheap in the spectrum of what you get by using the info you purchase).

    1. Re:Is anyone suprised by this? by chawly · · Score: 1

      I must admit to being slightly surprised, yes. But only slightly.

      --
      How many beans make five, anyhow ? ... Charles Walmsley
  62. U misspeled 'grammer', dolt. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sea the subject.

  63. Not suprising by varmittang · · Score: 2, Funny

    Hell, you can buy your wife while in Russia. I would expect to be able to buy just the info on other people's wifes.

    --
    -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
    12345
    -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
  64. Re:LONDON GETS HIT BY TERROR!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And, of course, they both need Israel to stir up the waters. Without Israel, neither side would really care about the other.

  65. Re:In Soviet Russia... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Where's your sense of humor?

    In Soviet Russia, information buys you!

  66. Get rid of the SS# by digitaldc · · Score: 1

    There is a consumer movement to have all companies purge peoples SS# from their databases, this will not stop fraud but will make it harder to rob people before you can say the words "our privacy policy and your data is secure."

    --
    He who knows best knows how little he knows. - Thomas Jefferson
  67. (-1, Troll) by orasio · · Score: 2, Informative

    GNU is not about information, it's about code, it's the Free _Software_ Foundation that's behind it, not the Free _Info_ foundation or whatever.

    Free Software is not about all kinds of freedom. It's just about software. It's like that, because in the context of software, freedom is much more obviously necessary than in other contexts, where its benefits can be more subtle.

    What you are talking about is those guys that say the "information wants to be free" stuff. I like that, but GNU/FSF has nothing to do with them.

    1. Re:(-1, Troll) by Luke-Jr · · Score: 1

      Nope, he is quite right. The problem is the flawed design used by systems such as credit cards and social security for authentication. If they were designed properly, sharing information wouldn't be a problem.

      --
      Luke-Jr
  68. Yes, this happens by gr8dude · · Score: 1
    Almost all the spam I get is in russian.
    A great share of it is promoting such databases.

    And since i'm in the middle of this war zone, I can help you get a better picture.

    This is just one such email //translated
    • info on banking transactions: 2003-2004; Shipped on an external 100Gb HDD - 700$
    • info on banking transactions: 2004; Shipped on an external 60Gb HDD - 400$
    • export/import transactions: 1998-2005, 23 CD, 6000 rubles
    • Moscow phone# database, 2003, 5 CD, 2000 rubles
    this was just an excerpt. Sorry, I don't know what the rate is, so I cannot give you the $-equivalent of the prices given in rubles.
    Here's what else the message contains:
    Each cd is shipped with detailed usage instructions; technical support available daily, from 10:00 to 19:00.

    Fucking assholes, they also sell databases of emails. You know, the funny thing is that for a long time they probably had no market for these things, because I only got spam which promotes email-databases, nothing else [no products, no services, etc].

    For those who can read russian, here's the original message (all I had to do was pick a random email from my junk folder)
    sorry, but /. doesn't seem to understand cyrillic.
    Reason: Please use fewer 'junk' characters.
  69. And the other question is.... by plopez · · Score: 1

    how much of it is accurrate? And how much of it could end up circulating around, get laundered through a grey market vendor and end up in a law enforcement or financial database?

    This could have serious implications for an individual's credit rating or whether they end up as a guest of a government security agency indefinitely with no legal recourse.

    I have worked in situations where we bought information on customers and just off hand I would say that when we compared our known good (recently updated by the customer) information with what we bought there was at least a 30 to 40% inaccurracy rate (name error, marital status or spouse errors, employment or business information errors etc.).

    --
    putting the 'B' in LGBTQ+
  70. Yea, but the implications are still frightning by XSforMe · · Score: 2, Informative

    Not long ago here in Mexico, a punk servicing a PC in the Federal Electoral Institute downloaded and sold the ENTIRE National Voter Registry to a two bit data aggregator, which in turn sold the database to Choicepoint in the U.S.

    Now the National Voter Registry contains the name, address, telephone and date of birth of all the people over 18 in the entire country. It is the basis for the most trusted identification used over the country and of our voting system.

    The costs of managing and updating the registry is just a bit over a thousand million dollars per year. The punk sold the database for measly 2000 dollars.

    After the excrement hited the cooling device, there was a big showdown between the aggregator, Choicepoint and the local authorities. The punk got busted and the buyers claim they destroyed the databases (yea, like hell they did).

    I for one am not ever updating my entry in the Registry.

    --
    My other OS is the MCP!
  71. Specific by fulldecent · · Score: 1

    Replies to this thread will list specific references to companies that provide this service, or hashes of files on P2P.

    --

    -- I was raised on the command line, bitch

  72. Why go to Russia when the DMV is so much closer? by Banner · · Score: 1

    In most states you can go to DMV and get their entire database for 50 or so bucks. In Oregon one guy used to post it online, so they made posting it online illegal. (Of course they didn't STOP selling the information!).

    They pretty much give you everything you need to commit identity fraud: License plate number, Car type, DL license, address, banking information, vin number, DOB, and supposedly you can even get the license database which includes driver photos!

  73. Are you tired of Phishing for data comrad? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Making life easier for phisher. Just be sending credit card an social security number to da address below for personal information.

    Comrad Phish

    easyphishing@yahooski.ru

  74. Spam, enforcement, cure by Vadim+Makarov · · Score: 1
    A couple of notes about it.

    1. I get several pieces of spam in Russian every day advertising these databases. Dammit.

    2. Law enforcement in Russia does nothing about it. In the current situation, it is trivial to catch the seller: the databases advertised in spam, for example, are delivered by a courier. If the police were interested in hindering this activity (or forcing it deeper underground, at least), they would do this in a blink of the eye. Nothing is done, though.

    3. I like the way Norway deals with this danger, partially at least. A lot of information in Norway is public, period. National and mobile operatiors phone directory is public (unless you specifically ask the mobile operator to withhold yor number from the listing) and searchable online. Summaries of tax amount, personal income and fortune by year are public for everybody, complete with mail addresses and year of birth (it used to be the full date of birth, but they have decided to limit it to the year recently). The tax database have been open for a good hundred of years, previously as paper records and now online. Only a handful of persons in the country can have their records hidden from the public view, usually those stalked by sex offenders (e.g. by former hisbands) and the like. Basic information on all companies and organizations is searchable online, too.

    --
    17779 eligible voters in a district, 17779 'vote' as one. This is Russia.
  75. Go get your free credit report.... by KMSelf · · Score: 1

    While you can see who's requested your credit report (and I'd recommend you check it at least annually), this has limited utility.

    While most financial institutions will prefer to obtain this data directly from the major vendors (Experian / Trans Union, Equifax), the problem is that data are transitive, but data tracing is not. You have no idea who among the entities who've requested your data have passed it on, or let it slip, to others.

    You may see the secondary queries and activity resulting from such leakage, however.

    What's happening right now is that the basis for assuming identity based on data characteristics is being called into serious question. The leakage must be assumed, and the genie can't be re-corked. Not that I'm happy about this either. But figuring out how to operate in this world, as individuals, as financial institutions, and as merchants, is going to be an interesting problem over the next few years.

    --

    What part of "gestalt" don't you understand?