PP is equivalent because they kill black people and many times target them because of their race. The founder of PP has even come out and said she was proud of being a speaker at a KKK meeting.
Tell me, are these unborn children actually volunteering to be killed? I highly doubt it, and even if they are, suicide is not acceptable.
There is never a need to kill anyone. Procreation is a natural consequence and purpose of sexual union. Sexual union done without that goal in mind is equivalent to jumping off a cliff while yelling "I want to live!". People should unite only with their spouses for the purposes of unity *and* procreation. If teens do so within a marital relationship for the correct reasons, there is no problem.
Abortion *is* murder and not even abortionists try to deny it.
Cannibalism is morally wrong. Beef/dog/cat consumption is morally acceptable. Murder of the unborn is morally wrong. Capital punishment is too vague to be completely acceptable or wrong. Slavery, also, is fairly vague and depends a lot on how slaves are treated (most importantly, slaves should keep their rights). Exercising natural rights, such as the right to share information is morally acceptable. Telling someone else what they can or cannot do (copyrights) is morally wrong.
Most, if not all, of that can be determined from a completely objective analysis of natural law. Note that these are *morals* which are different from things such as *ethics* where a society decides to look upon certain things (cat/dog consumption or sharing information, for example) with disgust.
The thing is, it's NOT free. Merely free of charge, which is irrelevant. It doesn't matter how much something costs if it denying your natural rights to modify and share it.
Also, tell me how you expect anyone on non-x86 platforms to view Flash right now? You can't (with the one exception of Mac OS). Hardly cross-platform.
Besides, isn't there an animated SVG format that does what Flash does better? After all, Flash is merely an animation format. Abuse of Flash (such as interactive websites) are just that-- abuse. Any website requiring Flash should be ignored and its contents considered useless.
The most obvious point to make is that AMD's x86 chips are quite superior to Intel's...
In regards to dropping x86 altogether: Apple wrote a m68k user-mode emulator years ago when they moved to PPC; qemu allows user-mode emulation on Linux systems; M$ may be evil, but I think they're perfectly capable of writing a x86 Windows-user-mode emulator.
Also,.NET applications don't seem to be x86, but a JIT-compiled bytecode. Certainly suggests M$ plans to drop x86 sometime.
x86 and PPCs (Apple doesn't make them) also often use more electricity and are less suitable from running off batteries.
I don't use immoral/proprietary software, which I'm assuming RISC OS is.
You're right that *I* certainly cannot prove when a person gains their soul, but I wouldn't assume that it is impossible.
Either way, it is better to err on the side of life than to kill what *might* be human.
After all, I'm not 100% sure that you're a real person-- you *could* be an AI script. Does that give me the right to kill you?
Your accusation of God's non-existence is without any evidence or logic. Nothing can never be disproven... Besides, God *has* been proven countless times over (no, I'm not going to Google for you).
Sharp Zaurus SL-C* models have 400 MHz ARM CPUs... *and* they're cheaper, it seems. Not to mention more convenient.
Unless these have better HDs, I'd rather import a Z than get one.
First: Life begins when the sperm unites with the egg and God supplies the soul.
Second: It does not, but... *attempting* to create a life (sexually uniting with a spouse) while *actively* trying to prevent it is wrong-- contraceptives *are* a no-no.
Sperm and egg are only two parts of a human, just as male and female are only two parts of a marriage. Male supplies the sperm. Female supplies the egg. God supplies the soul.
In the end, science will never conflict with the true religion (I'll leave it up to the reader to guess what it is; a hint: if organisation is good, wouldn't God's Church be organised?)
What can be done with the stem cells from murdered children that cannot also be done using the cells from unfertilised eggs (as in the article) or from adult stem cells? I don't think you'll find anything...
Slashdot Mirror
PP is equivalent because they kill black people and many times target them because of their race. The founder of PP has even come out and said she was proud of being a speaker at a KKK meeting.
Tell me, are these unborn children actually volunteering to be killed? I highly doubt it, and even if they are, suicide is not acceptable.
There is never a need to kill anyone. Procreation is a natural consequence and purpose of sexual union. Sexual union done without that goal in mind is equivalent to jumping off a cliff while yelling "I want to live!". People should unite only with their spouses for the purposes of unity *and* procreation. If teens do so within a marital relationship for the correct reasons, there is no problem.
Abortion *is* murder and not even abortionists try to deny it.
Cannibalism is morally wrong. Beef/dog/cat consumption is morally acceptable. Murder of the unborn is morally wrong. Capital punishment is too vague to be completely acceptable or wrong. Slavery, also, is fairly vague and depends a lot on how slaves are treated (most importantly, slaves should keep their rights). Exercising natural rights, such as the right to share information is morally acceptable. Telling someone else what they can or cannot do (copyrights) is morally wrong.
Most, if not all, of that can be determined from a completely objective analysis of natural law. Note that these are *morals* which are different from things such as *ethics* where a society decides to look upon certain things (cat/dog consumption or sharing information, for example) with disgust.
The thing is, it's NOT free. Merely free of charge, which is irrelevant. It doesn't matter how much something costs if it denying your natural rights to modify and share it.
Also, tell me how you expect anyone on non-x86 platforms to view Flash right now? You can't (with the one exception of Mac OS). Hardly cross-platform.
Besides, isn't there an animated SVG format that does what Flash does better? After all, Flash is merely an animation format. Abuse of Flash (such as interactive websites) are just that-- abuse. Any website requiring Flash should be ignored and its contents considered useless.
They also donate to Planned Parenthood (aka Ku Klux Klan).
Actually, morality *is* universal. But sharing information is also morally good, so long as you don't claim credit for what others create.
No, not everyone believes that unborn children have a soul or is human, but denying it won't change the reality that they do.
WRT54GS has a bit more space and RAM, IIRC, but I'm not aware of any actual features it has over the 54G
The most obvious point to make is that AMD's x86 chips are quite superior to Intel's...
.NET applications don't seem to be x86, but a JIT-compiled bytecode. Certainly suggests M$ plans to drop x86 sometime.
In regards to dropping x86 altogether: Apple wrote a m68k user-mode emulator years ago when they moved to PPC; qemu allows user-mode emulation on Linux systems; M$ may be evil, but I think they're perfectly capable of writing a x86 Windows-user-mode emulator.
Also,
Actually, PGP can support various ciphers. IDEA is just one-- and discouraged for usage due to insane patent laws.
I think the point the grandparent was getting at is that dir/ls/etc have *nothing to do with Linux*. The GNU system, maybe, but certainly not Linux.
No, proprietary software is an *unneccesary* evil.
x86 and PPCs (Apple doesn't make them) also often use more electricity and are less suitable from running off batteries. I don't use immoral/proprietary software, which I'm assuming RISC OS is.
Even if He did, egg+soul or sperm+soul doesn't make a complete human. Only egg+sperm+soul does.
The male genes choose gender.
How exactly does the woman who cannot 'get' any sex have *any* children in the first place?
Male genes determine the sex of the children so the female shouldn't really influence it...
You're right that *I* certainly cannot prove when a person gains their soul, but I wouldn't assume that it is impossible. Either way, it is better to err on the side of life than to kill what *might* be human. After all, I'm not 100% sure that you're a real person-- you *could* be an AI script. Does that give me the right to kill you?
Your accusation of God's non-existence is without any evidence or logic. Nothing can never be disproven... Besides, God *has* been proven countless times over (no, I'm not going to Google for you).
1) Abuse of modpoints == my point 2) Faulty mod judgement == my point 3) If it can be proven (which it likely can), it has nothing to do with faith.
Sharp Zaurus SL-C* models have 400 MHz ARM CPUs... *and* they're cheaper, it seems. Not to mention more convenient. Unless these have better HDs, I'd rather import a Z than get one.
Wow... talk about bad moderators... This is a troll *how*? I was merely pointing out the difference.
He won't be born until September.
First: Life begins when the sperm unites with the egg and God supplies the soul.
Second: It does not, but... *attempting* to create a life (sexually uniting with a spouse) while *actively* trying to prevent it is wrong-- contraceptives *are* a no-no.
Sperm and egg are only two parts of a human, just as male and female are only two parts of a marriage.
Male supplies the sperm.
Female supplies the egg.
God supplies the soul.
In the end, science will never conflict with the true religion (I'll leave it up to the reader to guess what it is; a hint: if organisation is good, wouldn't God's Church be organised?)
What can be done with the stem cells from murdered children that cannot also be done using the cells from unfertilised eggs (as in the article) or from adult stem cells? I don't think you'll find anything...