FYI, I've been using iCH for about a month and their reliability is horrible. At least 50% of my incoming calls go to voicemail instead of my phone-- and yes, my Asterisk system is keeping registered just fine.
Are you? Once the crime is started, the criminal is already liable-- you think they won't still make an attempt to get something out of it? After all, the police won't be there for at least a few minutes.
Actually, it would be nice if Linksys made a PAP2 with some kind of cell support-- then, when you dial '911' have it route via the cell instead of the net. Add a emergency power-savings mode that only bridges the cell network, and you've solved the 911 problem completely (unless I'm missing something)
When the power goes out, the cable usually still works. Just get a UPS for your router, cable modem, and VoIP device (if you want VoIP service) and you shouldn't have a problem.
(I'm assuming your computer is a laptop, since power outage and no UPS leaves you with a computer?)
God gave us logic and such to figure out the what is true and what isn't. Just because nobody can ever prove anything doesn't mean you should dismiss those items which have been proven (such as God's existence).
What nonsense is this? It's quite well-known that the crime rate decreases with gun legality and increases when guns become illegal.
911, however, does nothing to reduce crime-- nor is it meant to.
Facts are objective realities. Even if everyone in the world were to deny it, it would still be fact.
You misunderstand what opinion and fact are. I can have an opinion that purple is nicer than red. You can have an opinion that red is the best colour. But the Red Delicious apple is red regardless of what either of us think or believe.
Beliefs (different from both facts and opinions) are our perception of fact. Once you research a topic, your perception of the facts involved in it gets closer to the facts themselves.
Reality is not relative. It's ridiculous to believe something as obviously wrong as relativism (which is all based on the assumption that there are no absolute truths-- which is an absolute statement itself).
In the end, yes-- everyone who doesn't see the truth is wrong in that issue. I know I have many shortcomings in what I know, but that doesn't make my research in other areas any less truthful.
Just like any technology, cookies can be abused-- but that doesn't make them inherently bad. I solve the problem simply by forcing all cookies to be session cookies:)
Catholicism is entirely factual. It doesn't matter whether I or anyone else knows it was founded by God-- the fact remains that it was. As for how I know, that's induction.
I haven't "picked" it, I have been led to it and accepted reality as it is. If it were up to me to "pick" it, I'd probably screw up and pick something quite different. How is Catholicism so perfect? Simple: God founded it and has protected it from err. No other religion is founded by God nor completely based on fact.
They have "don't be evil" as their motto. If you don't like it, you shouldn't be buying their stock. Thus, stockholders should be pleased by fulfilment of such a motto.
Call it American English if you like, it's still not primary (aka British) English. Sure, I can put up with incorrect use of Linux, hacker, etc like you mention, but when it causes confusion with a more correct meaning, that's even more annoying.
Natural law are the laws of nature and how God designed the physical universe. Laws of local governments have no jurisdiction to contradict or override the laws which God has established. It doesn't matter what my "personal beliefs" are, but what does matter is the facts of reality you are ignoring.
Nobody involved in Roe vs Wade was pregnant to begin with. Please tell me how RvW isn't nonsense, again? The entire case is based upon a falsehood.
Then at least don't use M-W, which has in some cases the exact opposite definition for words. Besides, I suspect M-W only tries to be an American dictionary, not an English one.
Slashdot Mirror
Stanaphone provides gratis NYC phone numbers via VoIP/SIP.
FYI, I've been using iCH for about a month and their reliability is horrible. At least 50% of my incoming calls go to voicemail instead of my phone-- and yes, my Asterisk system is keeping registered just fine.
Armagetron is now Armagetron Advanced - http://armagetronad.net/
<?xml version="1.0"?>t xmlns="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:xmpp-stanzas">Server does not support PLAIN</text></error></iq></stream:stream>
<stream:stream xmlns:stream="http://etherx.jabber.org/streams" xmlns="jabber:client" to="gmail.com" >
<stream:stream from="gmail.com" id="E455CFA1" xmlns:stream="http://etherx.jabber.org/streams" xmlns="jabber:client"><iq type="get" id="auth_1" to="gmail.com" >
<query xmlns="jabber:iq:auth">
<username>lukedashjr</username>
</query>
</iq>
<iq type="error" id="auth_1" from="gmail.com">
<query xmlns="jabber:iq:auth">
<username>lukedashjr</username>
</query>
<error code="405" type="cancel"><not-allowed xmlns="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:xmpp-stanzas"/><tex
Are you? Once the crime is started, the criminal is already liable-- you think they won't still make an attempt to get something out of it? After all, the police won't be there for at least a few minutes.
Actually, it would be nice if Linksys made a PAP2 with some kind of cell support-- then, when you dial '911' have it route via the cell instead of the net. Add a emergency power-savings mode that only bridges the cell network, and you've solved the 911 problem completely (unless I'm missing something)
You can do that, provided both servers are standards-compliant. Here's a list of standards-compliant IM clients and a list of gratis, standards-compliant IM servers.
When the power goes out, the cable usually still works. Just get a UPS for your router, cable modem, and VoIP device (if you want VoIP service) and you shouldn't have a problem. (I'm assuming your computer is a laptop, since power outage and no UPS leaves you with a computer?)
God gave us logic and such to figure out the what is true and what isn't. Just because nobody can ever prove anything doesn't mean you should dismiss those items which have been proven (such as God's existence).
And FYI, I am married.
What nonsense is this? It's quite well-known that the crime rate decreases with gun legality and increases when guns become illegal. 911, however, does nothing to reduce crime-- nor is it meant to.
Lambda oor Lambda
If something is evil, it is evil. Likewise for good. It's not a matter of what I think is good or evil, but what actually is good and evil.
Facts are objective realities. Even if everyone in the world were to deny it, it would still be fact.
You misunderstand what opinion and fact are. I can have an opinion that purple is nicer than red. You can have an opinion that red is the best colour. But the Red Delicious apple is red regardless of what either of us think or believe.
Beliefs (different from both facts and opinions) are our perception of fact. Once you research a topic, your perception of the facts involved in it gets closer to the facts themselves.
Reality is not relative. It's ridiculous to believe something as obviously wrong as relativism (which is all based on the assumption that there are no absolute truths-- which is an absolute statement itself).
In the end, yes-- everyone who doesn't see the truth is wrong in that issue. I know I have many shortcomings in what I know, but that doesn't make my research in other areas any less truthful.
Good and evil are matters of fact. Opinions don't come into it.
Just like any technology, cookies can be abused-- but that doesn't make them inherently bad. I solve the problem simply by forcing all cookies to be session cookies :)
Catholicism is entirely factual. It doesn't matter whether I or anyone else knows it was founded by God-- the fact remains that it was. As for how I know, that's induction.
I haven't "picked" it, I have been led to it and accepted reality as it is. If it were up to me to "pick" it, I'd probably screw up and pick something quite different. How is Catholicism so perfect? Simple: God founded it and has protected it from err. No other religion is founded by God nor completely based on fact.
They have "don't be evil" as their motto. If you don't like it, you shouldn't be buying their stock. Thus, stockholders should be pleased by fulfilment of such a motto.
The only one, true God. False religions have no merit, true, but the one, true religion certainly does.
Call it American English if you like, it's still not primary (aka British) English. Sure, I can put up with incorrect use of Linux, hacker, etc like you mention, but when it causes confusion with a more correct meaning, that's even more annoying.
They are useful to force people to give you money, but that's no more moral than robbing a bank is.
Complying with unjust laws is failing their responsibility/duty to break them.
Natural law are the laws of nature and how God designed the physical universe. Laws of local governments have no jurisdiction to contradict or override the laws which God has established. It doesn't matter what my "personal beliefs" are, but what does matter is the facts of reality you are ignoring.
Nobody involved in Roe vs Wade was pregnant to begin with. Please tell me how RvW isn't nonsense, again? The entire case is based upon a falsehood.
Morally, you can copy stuff as much as you like. Copyright Law is immoral.
Then at least don't use M-W, which has in some cases the exact opposite definition for words. Besides, I suspect M-W only tries to be an American dictionary, not an English one.