Slashdot Mirror


2.7 Million VOIP Subscribers in the United States

prostoalex writes "There are 2.7 million paying VOIP customers in the United States, according to research by TeleGeography. The whole industry will generate $220 million this year, with Vonage leading as far as customer number."

116 comments

  1. What is even more interresting... by nordicfrost · · Score: 4, Interesting

    ...is how many "unpaying" VoIP there are in the US. I, for one, use services that are free, like Skype, to communicate with friends. Skype does have a payment service, but along with my friends I never need it. We kinda fly under the radar.

    I can't imagine that there are just a few of us that use systems like iChat, Skype etc. for voice communication.

    1. Re:What is even more interresting... by Grey+Ninja · · Score: 2, Informative

      I've given bucketloads to Skype for the PC2Phone services. But I've recently moved to voipbuster, where the calls are free... but hang up automatically after an hour. :(

    2. Re:What is even more interresting... by bogaboga · · Score: 1

      While I see your point, I find that what is even more interesting is the fact that this is one statistic we in the USA can be proud of. I believe we are in the lead here. I know that very soon, several countries will catch up and pass us just like all the other statistics have shown. Until that happens, I can claim bragging rights. Let's watch China, South Korea, Sweden, Japan, Finland, the United Kingdom and Germany.

    3. Re:What is even more interresting... by FidelCatsro · · Score: 1

      That sounds like a good deal , Most phone calls are much shorter than that . Ones longer could normally do with a small break before your ear falls off .

      --
      The only things certain in war are Propaganda and Death. You can never be sure which is which though
    4. Re:What is even more interresting... by caseydk · · Score: 4, Interesting


      Yeah, I was thinking of that, but even more important:

      220 million/year / 2.7 people = less than $100/person/year

      Seems like pretty low revenue/user. I hope the margins are good.

    5. Re:What is even more interresting... by Ctrl-Z · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but do they have a Linux client?

      --
      www.timcoleman.com is a total waste of your time. Never go there.
    6. Re:What is even more interresting... by JPriest · · Score: 2, Informative

      Another possible Skype alternitave is Gizmo they charge more than Skype for calling PSTN but the client UI is pretty full-featured.

      --
      Saying Java is nice because it works on all OS's is like saying that anal sex is nice because it works on all genders.
    7. Re:What is even more interresting... by cecil_turtle · · Score: 1

      Yeah but that's what technology is supposed to do - make doing the same things cheaper or easier. Remember 10 years ago when every cell phone provider had a plan for $15 / month? Now you can't touch most any cell phone plan for less than $30 or $40 / month. That's ridiculous.

      2 years ago before I switched to Vonage I was paying Verizon over $45 / month for a basic phone line with some features (caller id, call waiting, etc.). My wife and I use almost zero long distance and don't even talk on the phone locally that much. Now I pay $16.94 / month to Vonage all said and done after taxes and with more features than Verizon offered. That's how it should work - advancing technology lets me do the same for cheaper. Before Vonage it seemed my Verizon bill just kept getting bigger with no additional benefit to me.

      Obviously Vonage doesn't have to maintian a physical infrastructure like Verizon does; their technology is built on an existing one. Hopefully that allows them to still be profitable at the much lower cost.

    8. Re:What is even more interresting... by SeeTheLight · · Score: 1

      Yes

    9. Re:What is even more interresting... by jonbryce · · Score: 1

      I think the main reason that VOIP isn't so popular in the UK is that most long distance phone companies charge much the same rates as the likes of Vonage, so there isn't really any point in having the hassle of using your computer to make calls, or buying the kit to use a normal phone over the internet.

    10. Re: What is even more interresting... by mutende · · Score: 1

      And there's a Linux version available on 23rd August...

      --
      Unselfish actions pay back better
    11. Re:What is even more interresting... by caseydk · · Score: 1


      Unfortunately, if they're working entirely by using others' infrastructures there will eventually come a point where they have to pay to maintain some portion of the infrastructure...

      This isn't much of a near-term problem, but if Verizon, et al's revenue starts suffering as a result, they're liable to fight back any way they can.

    12. Re:What is even more interresting... by timeOday · · Score: 2, Interesting
      ...is how many "unpaying" VoIP there are in the US. I, for one, use services that are free, like Skype, to communicate with friends.
      It's not direct IP-to-IP calls that cost, it's the IP-to-POTS bridge.

      That's why it's so annoying that Vonage locks down your IP telephone adapter, so you cannot receive direct IP calls from outside the Vonage network.

      I think they're trying to create an expectation that VOIP should incur a charge over and above normal IP services. There's no good reason for that.

    13. Re:What is even more interresting... by carlislematthew · · Score: 1
      Using Vonage does not require using your computer. It plugs into your broadband connection and allows you to use your normal phone. In addition, Vonage charge something like $40 to get set up, and then the first month is free. So I don't think setup fee or hassle is the reason...

      It could be the rates though - I moved away from England several years ago and so I don't remember how much they charge.

    14. Re:What is even more interresting... by jonbryce · · Score: 1

      In the UK, Vonage costs £9.99 per month for unlimited calls to UK and Ireland. You have to pay £29.99 in Staples for the router that allows you to plug your normal phone into your internet connection.

      Onetel charges £10.99 per month for unlimited calls, or you could get it from Tele2 for £7.49 or Tiscali for £7.99. They use carrier preselect, which means you just sign up and use your existing phone as normal.

      Vonage does have the advantage that it includes calls to Ireland, but unless you happen to make a lot of calls to Ireland, you would be better off going elsewhere.

    15. Re:What is even more interresting... by MemoryAid · · Score: 1
      As a customer of a traditional phone company, I am proud to say that I am "generating" more than my share of revenue.

      What, generating revenue isn't the goal? Huh.

      Gross revenue is only one way to measure an industry, and as several people have pointed out here, it doesn't seem to be a good way to measure VOIP, because it is commonly free. Of course, determining the number of phone call-minutes is going to be difficult for this technology....

      --
      Language students: Don't try to learn English here. This ain't it.
    16. Re:What is even more interresting... by elgaard · · Score: 1

      Like we all pay extra to email providers so they can pay for the infrastructure?

      VoIP is just one service among others on the internet, not even a very demanding one.

    17. Re:What is even more interresting... by Ctrl-Z · · Score: 1

      I know Skype has. I was asking about voipbuster.

      --
      www.timcoleman.com is a total waste of your time. Never go there.
    18. Re:What is even more interresting... by SeeTheLight · · Score: 1

      Ah, sorry about that then.

  2. 911? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Is this still a shortcoming of VOIP? If so, that's a lot of people without a lifeline.

    1. Re:911? by Albanach · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Only if they ditched all their other phones.

      Most houses with VoIP probably still have their landline (for the DSL they use the VoIP over) plus the one, two or three family mobiles.

      Yes,a 911 service needs to be established, though there should be some onus on governments to help here because it's an international problem. If I'm travelling with my laptop my VoIP number comes with me and knows not if I'm in the States, Canada or Europe. Why can't we click a world map to say where we are and give the operators a standard interface so 911 calls can go to the appropriate location?

    2. Re:911? by legirons · · Score: 1

      Or a lot of people with cellphones as their "emergency contact"

    3. Re:911? by bn0p · · Score: 2, Informative

      Yes and no.
      Unfortunately it's still mostly yes. Many VOIP vendors, including Vonage, are issuing disclaimers to avoid problems. There was a story recently in the Denver area regarding the death of a baby due to a 13 minute delay in getting the 911 call to an emergency response center in the correct part of town. The carrier (not Vonage by the way) allegedly had the wrong address in their 911 database.

      VOIP vendors will (and probably should) issue disclaimers until they can work out a way to provide 911 service that is as reliable as that provided by the traditional carriers. Given that network and power outages still make VOIP unusable, this may take a while.

      Bottom line: if 911 is important, keep a POTS (plain old telephone service) line. I do.

      Never let reality temper imagination

      --
      Never let reality temper imagination
    4. Re:911? by dattaway · · Score: 3, Informative

      Sure, you can always reach 911, but if it works is another question. Here in Kansas City even with the tax increase for fire and police, 911 is still worthless. You will still reach 911 with Vonage, only to hear "your call is important, do not hang up!" for half an hour before you reach a human. Give another few hours for police to show up if they deem its REALLY an emergency. We approved concealed carry, because 911 is NOT working.

    5. Re:911? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We approved concealed carry, because 911 is NOT working.

      How is a concealed weapon going to help you when you have a heart attack?

    6. Re:911? by greg_barton · · Score: 1

      We approved concealed carry, because 911 is NOT working.

      You mean you approved your pet conservative cause that is not proven to reduce crime because you won't pay for the services that are?

    7. Re:911? by rekoil · · Score: 2, Informative

      Most VoIP customers use cable internet, not DSL. And probably cancelled their land line. I use Vonage on my DSL line, but only because I got the DSL "bare", without having to buy dialtone from BellSouth on the line.

      One factoid: phone companies are required to allow one to dial 911 on any phone line, whether it's active or not. So even if you cancel your phone service, you can still make a 911 call on the pair even if you don't have dialtone. Same deal with cellphones...any cellphone tower will take a 911 call from any compatible (GSM, DCMA, etc) phone in the area regardless of what provider it's subscribed to.

    8. Re:911? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "We approved concealed carry" ...

      That blows my mind. Having people running around with guns tucked in to their trousers does not make me feel safe. Quite the opposite in fact.

      Then again, I live somewhere where nobody has guns. You know I've never seen a real gun? Except maybe that one time I noticed a cop carrying one. Not like they ever use them.

      Maybe I'm a sitting duck, but I've never had the occasion or desire to use a firearm, nor known anyone who was in such a position. Violence of any kind has never played a part in my life. Maybe I'm just not equiped to understand the American experience ...

      Frankly, guns scare the **** out of me. But that makes me want NOT to carry one. Being scared of guns and violence, and thus carrying a gun in case you need to exercise violence seems like a bad cycle. Soon everyone has guns, and is scared of everyone elses guns. Then a gun goes off. Then everyone starts shooting. It's like the movies. :)

    9. Re:911? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you can shoot yourself in the face, that will minimize the importance of the heart attack

    10. Re:911? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yea, a fat lot of good 911 does when it takes the police 2 HOURS to travel 3 blocks.

      if my life ever depends on 911, ill be a dead man.

    11. Re:911? by dnoyeb · · Score: 1

      Since we have 2 cell phones in the house, we dumped out POST.

      Since they are passing regulations on 911 over voip, the liability will fall on the regulation creators as opposed to the companies themselves. So long as the companies satisfy the regulation.

    12. Re:911? by carlislematthew · · Score: 1

      I have never called 911 from my POTS line, and I don't plan on doing so in the future! Avoid unforseen emergencies - that's my advice. ;)

    13. Re:911? by dmccarty · · Score: 1
      Here where I live in Illinois, Vonage connects me to my local 911 call center, but the call comes in on an outside line. When I tested a 911 call, the operator was surprised to get a call that way, but as long as the call went through I was satisfied.

      As a back up, we have two cell phones.

      --
      Have fun: Join D.N.A. (National Dyslexics Association)
    14. Re:911? by daspriest · · Score: 1

      I thought that this was the issue the FCC was confronting in this story.

    15. Re:911? by espo812 · · Score: 1
      You mean you approved your pet conservative cause that is not proven to reduce crime because you won't pay for the services that are?
      It reduces crime for approximately two million individuals per year. Police have no obligation to defend individuals, so even if "crime" were reduced by dumping more money into police, that may or may not have a bearing on violent crime. Moreover, a well paid police force is little comfort to the family of a law abiding citizen complying with state and local laws abridging the Second Amendment who gets attacked by a criminal.
      --

      espo
    16. Re:911? by Luke-Jr · · Score: 1

      What nonsense is this? It's quite well-known that the crime rate decreases with gun legality and increases when guns become illegal. 911, however, does nothing to reduce crime-- nor is it meant to.

      --
      Luke-Jr
    17. Re:911? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      911 is only good for scraping you off the concrete if there is a real crime. You don't even have to use the gun to prevent violent crime most of the time. The threat is enough.

    18. Re:911? by greg_barton · · Score: 1

      911, however, does nothing to reduce crime-- nor is it meant to.

      Right. Being able to summon police to the scene of a crime does not stop crime. Being able to inform police of a crime in progress would never help to stop that crime. Sure.

      Are you a fucking idiot?

    19. Re:911? by greg_barton · · Score: 1, Troll

      It reduces crime for approximately two million individuals per year.

      I'm sorry bubba, but the level of proof between the "concealed carry laws reduce crime" assertion and the "effective law enforcement reduces crime" assertion are not comparable. End of story.

      Look, I live in Texas. I could carry a gun if I wanted to. I love to shoot shit. It's fun. I've also never been a victim of a violent crime, and I've lived in Dallas all of my life, lots of it in the roughest areas. (Dallas has the highest murder rate in the nation, and is very high on other violent and property crimes.) Carrying a gun will only make you stupid and get you into trouble. You want to avoid crime? Don't be stupid and keep your eyes open.

    20. Re:911? by ErikZ · · Score: 0, Flamebait


      Yeah man. I've been smoking all my life and have never gotten cancer. All those studies are BS.

      --
      Democrats or Republicans. They are both taking us to the same place and they are not afraid of us anymore.
    21. Re:911? by slughead · · Score: 1

      How is a concealed weapon going to help you when you have a heart attack?

      It's kind of like when a cowboy's horse gets a broken leg...

    22. Re:911? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Are you a fucking idiot?

      Well....he's a troll. Probably an idiot too though
    23. Re:911? by bluGill · · Score: 1

      How does your irrational fear of guns make it dangerous for me to have one on me. I'm talking about me personally, not a criminal who will have one no matter what the law says. (If they were afraid of the law they wouldn't go into crime in the first place)

      The police are unlikely to be there to protect me if a criminal decides to take on me, but my Gun is always ready, and I know how to use it. I hope I never have to, odds are against it, but if I need it I have it. Guns are also useful for things other than protecting me. I enjoy target practice once in a while. I enjoy hunting (in season), not to mention the good it puts on my table.

    24. Re:911? by bluGill · · Score: 1

      It isn't prooven to increase crime either. Therefore why not let the honest folks carry a gun in case it helps?

    25. Re:911? by SonicSpike · · Score: 1

      A gun in the hand is better than a cop on the phone.

      and

      "911" - government sponsored Dial-a-Prayer

      --
      Libertas in infinitum
    26. Re:911? by Luke-Jr · · Score: 1

      Are you? Once the crime is started, the criminal is already liable-- you think they won't still make an attempt to get something out of it? After all, the police won't be there for at least a few minutes.

      --
      Luke-Jr
  3. Incumbant telco's by confusion · · Score: 1

    I talk to the big telcos on a regular basis as part of my job and I've been jabbing them for a while about the impending death of their voice business, but their stories have been changing, well not Bell South, but the others are really pushing hard into home and business VOIP, especially ATT.

    POTS doesn't need a death watch yet, but it's certainly moving that way.

    Jerry
    http://www.cyvin.org/

  4. Market Ready for High Quality Now? by ZX81 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    So, now that people are starting to take up VoIP, do you think that people will start to look for the best quality or continue to go for the cheapest price.

    At our company (don't worry we only deal with companies, so this isn't an ad), we have a new routing system that does Least Cost Routing, but with weighting. This allows us to weight providers higher or lower based on their performance/quality.

    While this increases our prices slightly, it does mean that we have pretty good QOS.

    Do you think that as the market progresses this will be something that consumers get or will it always be the domain of large enterprises?

    --
    -={ Security does not exist - give up }=-
  5. Yeah... but the problem is.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    ..that you "don't matter", since you're "leeching" and not "generating millions for the industry".. :|

  6. Sounds fantastic! (...fantastic) by bigtallmofo · · Score: 5, Funny

    I was one of the early (...early) adopters of voice over IP (...pee) and I think {static} is great (...great).

    My hat's off to Vonage (...ojj)

    --
    I'm a big tall mofo.
  7. OptimumOnline by The+Ape+With+No+Name · · Score: 2, Funny

    We have OOL here in Brooklyn. The service is great and we haven't had a probl

    --
    Comparing it to Windows will be a moot point, since El Dorado is going to have a 40% larger code base than XP.
    1. Re:OptimumOnline by Rocky1138 · · Score: 1

      I'm still trying to figure out if that was a joke or not.

  8. I just can't let go ... by krygny · · Score: 3, Interesting

    ... of the ol' hard wired POTS phone in my kitchen. I hardly ever use it, but it was the only one I had during the blackout here in the northeast a couple years ago. The cell system had power, but getting a line was iffy.

    --
    Research shows that 67% of those who use the term "research shows", are just making shit up.
  9. These aren't bragging numbers by TuxPaper · · Score: 3, Interesting
    I see a few posts bragging about these numbers. Stop now before you embarass yourself.

    For example, the biggest VOIP company in Japan, Softbank has about 4.4 million VoIP customers. Yes, that's just one of the VOIP companies in Japan. (Source: cabledatacomnews.com)

    I'm not here to brag about Japan. I'm sure S. Korea and China have impressive, if not larger numbers of VOIP users.

  10. POTS by ClaraBow · · Score: 2, Insightful

    is still the most reliable for me. When the power goes out (often), I still have my phone working and can even use dial-up to send a quick email. The technology is very simple and super reliable, so it won't go away anytime soon.

    1. Re:POTS by Luke-Jr · · Score: 1

      When the power goes out, the cable usually still works. Just get a UPS for your router, cable modem, and VoIP device (if you want VoIP service) and you shouldn't have a problem. (I'm assuming your computer is a laptop, since power outage and no UPS leaves you with a computer?)

      --
      Luke-Jr
    2. Re:POTS by silverkniveshotmail. · · Score: 1

      Or just get a cell phone. it doesn't even need to have service, as most (all?) cell phones will let you dial 911 no matter what.

    3. Re:POTS by Luke-Jr · · Score: 1

      Actually, it would be nice if Linksys made a PAP2 with some kind of cell support-- then, when you dial '911' have it route via the cell instead of the net. Add a emergency power-savings mode that only bridges the cell network, and you've solved the 911 problem completely (unless I'm missing something)

      --
      Luke-Jr
    4. Re:POTS by silverkniveshotmail. · · Score: 1

      sounds too complicated and thus expensive. not to mention the problems the cell phone companies might have with it.

  11. Something doesn't add up. by tdemark · · Score: 4, Insightful

    $220 million / 2.7 million users = $81.48 / year
    $81.48 per year / 12 month = $6.79 / month

    The average VOIP account only is only $6.79 per month? That doesn't seem right. I have one of the cheaper accounts available ($14.99, VoicePulse), so I am a little skeptical of that number.

    From the linked article, Vonage has 750,000 customers. Assuming they are all on the cheapest plan:

    750,000 x $14.99 x 12 = 134,910,000

    Which would mean for all non-Vonage VOIP customers:

    $85 million / 2 million customers / 12 months = $3.54 per month per customer

    Given the other players involved (VoicePulse, Voicewing, AT&T, Time Warner), I have a hard time believing that number.

    - Tony

    1. Re:Something doesn't add up. by Nuclear+Elephant · · Score: 1

      The average VOIP account only is only $6.79 per month? That doesn't seem right. I have one of the cheaper accounts available ($14.99, VoicePulse [voicepulse.com]), so I am a little skeptical of that number.

      Vonage has hired several Bistromathematicians experts to sort out the numbers. It's part of the corporate strategy to give the illusion of being on top.

    2. Re:Something doesn't add up. by mattmacf · · Score: 2, Interesting
      From TFA: TeleGeography found 2.7 mln US VOIP subscribers nationwide in Q2 2005, compared with just 440,000 in Q2 2004. The revenue generated from consumer VoIP services remained relatively small, at $220 mln

      The $220 million figure may be derived from just Q2 sales figures. Using this, the number doesn't seem as suspect.

      $220 million / 2.7 million users = $81.48 / quarter
      $81.48 per year / 3 months = $27.16 / month

      Given prices for VoIP being between around $20-40/month, an average of $27.16 sounds about right.

      --
      I only mod funny =D
    3. Re:Something doesn't add up. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or it may be that the takeup rate is so high that most subscribers have only been on the service a few months, so the annual revenue only includes 3 months of service to most customers so far.

      Less optimistically, it may mean high turnover in customers. After 3 months the typical customer drops their service, as they find it more cost effective to just have a single higher-minute cellular plan and actually have the phone with them at all times.

    4. Re:Something doesn't add up. by bobcat7677 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Keep in mind that pretty much the only services that charge monthly fees are the ones that have PTSN access and a PTSN # packaged in the service. I have 3 different VOIP providers configured in my Asterisk switch for different things. Only one of them (Voicepulse Connect) charges me a monthly fee...and that's just because my incoming number is on that account. The others just charge based on my usage of the PTSN (at
      In the end though I'm just playing Devils advocate to a degree. I agree the numbers appear to be skewed. With all the VOIP providers out there, there has got to be more then 2.7 million customers. Like some of my accounts, many of them may not be generating significant revenue, but then VOIP was never meant to be a cash cow service.

    5. Re:Something doesn't add up. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Multiple people could often be using one account. For example, if you had a household of four people, it would be $6.79/mo. * 4 = $27.16/mo.

      I don't know if they were using "customers" to refer to individual users or number of accounts though.

    6. Re:Something doesn't add up. by rob_squared · · Score: 1

      I'm guessing they include stuff like SipPhone that only charges $70 for a year's access to a regular phone # and $10/$20/$50 for minutes that last for about 2 years. So if you work it right, that hovers below the $6.79 number.

      --
      I don't get it.
    7. Re:Something doesn't add up. by mcmurray_ian · · Score: 1

      Exactly, Asterisk comes to the rescue. I'm using sipphone and voipjet (which charge no monthly fee) but you pay for the calls as you go (which if you use voipjet is really cheap!) 1.3c per minute US / UK. SO not all VOIP users are paying a Vonage monthly fee. On the other hand I did purchase a sipphone virtual number for $70 a year - so there is where some of my contribution comes in to this figure, but this fee is a 'must have' for me since I'd like people outside of VOIP to have the chance to call me. I'm still looking for a way to purchase cheaper DID's - any ideas to beat $70 a year?

  12. VoIP "pitfalls" by SuperDuG · · Score: 3, Interesting
    I was a Vonage customer for almost a year and a half. I enjoyed the service, but did realize that I was paying for 500 minutes whether I used them or not (just like a cell phone).

    Next problem is I moved, and I found a better deal through my phone company. You may want to check and see what deals your current phone provider has before you jump on the VoIP wagon.

    VoIP is an excellent solution for people who are on the phone long distance for more than just your usual call to your relatives to check up.

    I looked at my useage and already had a cell phone. I must say, in the grand scheme of things that VoIP was not a solution for me any longer.

    Canceling Vonage takes close to an act of congress. You have to call their cancellation center (forget that it's only open 7.5 hours a day monday - friday) then you have to sit on hold (forget the fact that it's like any other call center that you wait a fair amount of time on hold) and then you are given a Return number. Also you are given a $40 charge to your credit card. You have to scrounge up the power supply, ata box, phone cord, ethernet cord, and manual. If you're like me and you know that you'd eventually have to return this stuff, you kept all that in a box in the closet. If you don't return everything, you don't get the refund.

    I was very impressed with Vonage until the very end in which they would not let me cancel my service until I heard a song and dance and agreed that I didn't want their service any more.

    If you have a cell phone with long distance and rarely ever need to make a lengthy long distance phone call, VoIP ain't it.

    --
    Ignore the "p2p is theft" trolls, they're just uninformed
    1. Re:VoIP "pitfalls" by zborgerd · · Score: 1
      I think that the $40 is a bit silly, considering that they advertise it as a "free phone adapter" (it's not free if you have to pay for it). It would appear that it is detailed in their terms of service though.

      I doubt that they really even reuse these things. It would be more likely that they use it as another way to milk $40 from a customer before they drop the service. Kinda shady, but I guess we have to read the fine print.

      http://vonage.com/features_terms_service.php?lid=f ooter_terms

      Seems to be noted under: "2.10 Return of Device (Does Not Apply to Business Plus Customers)"

    2. Re:VoIP "pitfalls" by RandomJoe · · Score: 1

      I haven't had to cancel yet, so don't know that end of it. But I almost never make long distance calls, and I would say VoIP is still quite desirable. Granted, my usage is also out of the norm.

      I switched from SBC POTS to Cox Cable's phone system because it was cheaper. Not a whole lot, but a bit. Then I switched to VoIP because it is HALF Cox's price and gives me a ton more features. Being able to check my messages online from anywhere is icing on the cake. I only have Vonage's 500 minute plan, but then if I'm on the phone for 8 1/2 hours in a single month something really strange is happening! If I were to use it that much, the $25 plan is still cheaper than what I was paying Cox for the service provided. Indeed, Cox would have been much higher than what I was paying them if I had added everything available to make it as close as possible to Vonage.

      I have recently gotten flyers from both SBC and Cox offering "cheap" service - the last one was $4.95/month. But they are limited time, a year or less, and they STILL charge extra for any line features. They still haven't figured it out...

    3. Re:VoIP "pitfalls" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the best deal my local phone company offers... $45 a month. no frills, no LD, no nothing

      best deal on VOIP (broadvoice) $11.95 a month, w/ voicemail, caller ID, LD is only 5 cents/min (or get unlimited LD for $20/mo)

      no contest.

    4. Re:VoIP "pitfalls" by pwinkeler · · Score: 1

      Having run my own OSS PBX, Asterisk for over a year now I was able to use its Call Detail Records (CDR) database to figure out that my best bet was to use Broadvoice and its unlimited in-state plan at $9.99/mo and Voicepulse with its DirectConnect! service to pay 2.4 cents/min for all other calls. I estimate my phone bills will be around $15/mo instead of paying SBC $38 just for local service!

      Not to mention that I can now take and make multiple calls simultaneously.

      It's all in knowing your usage when designing a provider solution but having your own PBX also gives you the flexibility to actually mix and match.

      As usualy YMMV.

      --
      PaulW, IT Consultant
  13. In France by boa13 · · Score: 2, Informative

    In France, there's almost 2 millions VoIP subscribers, which means VoIP is three and a half more popular here.

    This is mostly due to Free, a kick-ass ISP which bundles maximum-speed DSL access (4.6 Mbps in my case, 10,000 feet from the DSLAM), free VoIP communications (to all landlines in France, and cheap rates for everyhting else, except cellular phones), 100 free TV stations (plus 100 others for various fees), an unlimited number of 1 GB web spaces with unlimited bandwidth, no ads, and MySQL+PHP5 support, an unlimited number of mailboxes, and plenty of things I forget right now, all that for the great price of 30 euros per month.

    Their customer service sucks, though, and you better not have problems, because they'll take a long while to be solved.

    Overall, I'm happy. :-)

    I wonder how the VoIP and DSL services are in countries other than France and the U.S.

    1. Re:In France by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      DSL in the US requires you also order a phone number and phone service attached to it, which is around $20-30/month even if you don't make/receive a single call on it. That is in addition to the DSL $40/month charge. The bandwidth is not good. There is no profit in being on DLS. there is a new offering from Verizon, called FIOS, which is basically fiber to your residence with 30 megs downstream and 5 megs upstream, for around $40/month. That is interesting because I don't see any phone services attached to it. Raw Internet - unfortunately, it is not offered outside of several big metro areas, Miami is one.

    2. Re:In France by boa13 · · Score: 1

      I forgot to say that, in order to subscribe at Free, I had to reopen the phone line (which had been closed for more than three months), and in order to reopen the phone line, I had to subscribe for one year to France Telecom's phone service, France Telecom being the main competitor of Free, but also the owner of almost all land lines in France.

      So, that's another 14 euros per month, which I'll be able to cancel several months from now.

      (Free is of course fighting against this kind of screw-up, actually they've been gaining some ground, especially for phone lines closed less than three months ago.)

      As far as availability is concerned, Free, like most DSL services, is only available in densely populated areas -- in and around Paris, and in major towns in France. If you live in a rural area, tough luck.

  14. Yeah, but which service is the best? by halr9000 · · Score: 1

    Has anyone seen a good rundown on the pros and cons of a lot of VOIP services? I'm looking to get a second line at the house for work, but don't want to pay for it. I don't mind paying $5-7 for an incoming virtual phone#, I just don't want to pay $35-45 for a regulated line.

    Skype is cool but not sure if it has the features I would need. I like Voicepulse's features but they are still in the $20+ range. I'm gonna be low usage on the call-out (to PSTN), so I want to stick with something where I pay as I go for minutes.

    Right now I'm looking at SIPphone and Gizmo.

    1. Re:Yeah, but which service is the best? by CProgrammer98 · · Score: 1

      I'm curious as to what you need that skype doesn't have? Seems very comprehensive a service to me.. no 911 but that's true of all VOIP services U think

      --
      And the people shall be oppressed, every one by another, and every one by his neighbour Isaiah 3:5
    2. Re:Yeah, but which service is the best? by halr9000 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Well the main one that it's not SIP, so you can't take advantage of all of the SIP software and hardware. So I want it to ring an actual telephone.

      Also:
      - distinctive ring
      - call forwarding
      - voicemail

      Check out some of this stuff: http://www.voicepulse.com/features/advanced/defaul t.aspx

      I don't need all of that but its certainly a laundry list of cool VOIP stuff.

    3. Re:Yeah, but which service is the best? by mcmurray_ian · · Score: 1

      For the 'normal' joe public you are correct - Skype fits the glove. However for some Nerds who like to push the limits - Skype is a closed source tool. That's where SIP comes in handy (open source) especially with tools like the Gizmo Project. Since SIP is open source, it is much easier to develop other tools to integrate etc.... So to make a long story short - If you're happy with Skype - use it - however if you want to push the limits of VOIP - then use gizmoproject / SIP or any of the other SIP compatible tools out there. I love using Asterisk with SIP since asterisk acts like a bridging platform for any open VOIP protocol. Allowing you to perform Least Cost Routing on your own phone system (or setting up PBX style features for your home phones!!!) Bundled with a ATA adapter (Sipura - spa 1001) you can turn your normal phone into a VOIP capable phone for under $60. But that's if you're interested in experimenting and not just receiving a dial tone. It's all about choices and that what I like.

    4. Re:Yeah, but which service is the best? by CProgrammer98 · · Score: 1

      call forwarding:

      voicemail: here but there's a charge

      Distinctive ring - some of the dual voip/pots handsets do it but it looks like only to distinguish between voip and pots

      not defending skype but there is more to skype than some realise

      --
      And the people shall be oppressed, every one by another, and every one by his neighbour Isaiah 3:5
  15. Yeh... but which phone service by outsourced · · Score: 2, Funny

    makes my squeaky geeky voice sounds manly when I ask Betty Lou out on a date?

  16. Re:Sounds fantastic! (...fantastic) by zborgerd · · Score: 1
    My only complaint about Vonage is that their rented exchanges don't always have the same capabilities.

    I just signed up, and while they advertise the ability to transfer (port) landline and cellphone numbers to their service, they happened to put me on an exchange (owned by McLeod) that can only accept landline number transfers. It's a bit annoying because I just made a $50 cellphone payment that could have been avoided if they had all of their stuff in order. My number even passed the number "test" on their web page, but took them two weeks to tell me that the transfer was impossible (due to their exchange's limitations).

    It's something to be aware of when folks sign up for Vonage service. The LNP transfer is ofter a tedious process, and not all of their providers have the same capabilities. They do *not* tell you this until after you already sign up.

    Otherwise, the service seems to be quite reliable and sounds great. It has boatloads of excellent features and should provide a nice bridge between IP and POTS communication.

  17. Opposite experience by mgkimsal2 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Due to odd circumstances, I've had 3 vonage accounts in the last year, 2 of which I've had to cancel. It's never taken me more than 15 minutes to cancel, and there's no song and dance or credit card charges.

    The differences may be that I'd bought my own equipment from bestbuy and sam's club already, so there was no issue of returning anything. They just shut off my number - nothing more to it. They did ask why I was cancelling, I told them, and that was it.

    I do agree that in some cases, it's not worth it for some people - paying for the 500 minutes whether you use it or not. But, let me put some of my numbers to you.

    I have a cable modem - roughly $40/month. I'm using that no matter what for internet access. Adding an extra $15/month in vonage on top of that means phone/internet is $55/month. Yes, I'm paying for '500 minutes even if I don't use them' (a vonage 'rollover minutes' plan like cingular would be great).

    However, compare that to my local verizon POTS. It's close to $50/month *before any other charges*. Start adding on all the per minute fees for calls, then extra taxes on top of that, and it's crazy.

    Our phone usage pattern is probably different from most - we've got family both in UK and Australia. Verizon's *best* deal was 10 cents/minute to Australia - Vonage is 4 cents, which includes taxes (verizon adds on taxes later). And to get that wonderful 10 cents per minute rate I have to sign up for 'international caller' plan at an extra $4.99/month.

    Yes, the quality of the Vonage line isn't as solid as the POTS. Occasionally there is static or a really bad connection. I'd say that's less than 1 in 10 calls. But for a 60+% savings, it's definitely worth it in our case.

  18. Why this is not sustainable... by cardpuncher · · Score: 4, Interesting

    "Operator, I'm trying to call my elderly mother, but there seems to be a fault..."

    "Sir, you'll have to have your mother run traceroute and then call us back."

    "How do I call my mother to tell her and how does she run traceroute?"

    "Perhaps you can download the instructions from our website and mail them to her?"

    1. Re:Why this is not sustainable... by SeeTheLight · · Score: 1

      Doesn't BrightHouse or Time Warner Digital Phone service offer on-site techs for VoIP line issues?

    2. Re:Why this is not sustainable... by cardpuncher · · Score: 1

      I really don't know. However, if I have VoIP service from Company A running over broadband from Company B using wires provided by Company C and wish to communicate with another party with services from D, E and F, then how do I identify which of (A, B, C, D, E, F) might be required to resolve the problem - and if the problem is with one or more of (D, E, F), with whom I have no contractual relationship, what incentive is there for them to fix it?

      These are issues that have been addressed by fixed-line telephone companies by virtue of monopoly or regulation: VoIP will ultimately need one or the other if it's going to make it to granny territory. More likely, though, as telephone companies replace their circuit-switching kit with cheaper packet-switching kit, POTS costs will come down to a point at which granny can't see much of a saving(s) anyway.

    3. Re:Why this is not sustainable... by SeaFox · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I really don't know. However, if I have VoIP service from Company A running over broadband from Company B using wires provided by Company C and wish to communicate with another party with services from D, E and F, then how do I identify which of (A, B, C, D, E, F) might be required to resolve the problem - and if the problem is with one or more of (D, E, F), with whom I have no contractual relationship, what incentive is there for them to fix it?

      This is the joke of VoIP service, and something they don't tell you when you sign up. Technically NONE OF THEM ARE!

      Vonage can only solve problems on their servers, if the issue is with your broadband provider, you can call them and talk to them about the issue. But keep in mind your cableco probably offers phone service of it's own in competition to VoIP, they measure quality of service from the standpoint of "your internet connection is used for web surfing", which doesn't require as robust a connection as VoIP or XBox Live when it comes to latancy.

      They might have an issue with latancy they will try to improve, but they wont guarantee you Vonage will sound crystal clear. If you're having trouble and they think your connection is "fine", you're SOL. They will probably try to sell you on their own phone service.

      What you have to remember is when you get digital phone service from a cableco (not VoIP tied to your cable modem, but where an RSU is mounted on the outside of your house) they have legal responsibilities that don't apply to cable modem or cable TV service to make sure the service (and 911) are working to decent standard (like SBC would have to). Since this standard doesn't exist for your broadband internet, and they aren't recieving any revenue from your Vonage usage, they aren't that bothered by your sercice being up to snuff for it. The fact there are few choices in broadband internet service for most people helps this.

  19. Who's in the VoIP Section? by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

    "Time Warner [is the] second-largest, trailing only Vonage [which has about] 750,000 [3x 2004Q2]"

    Who's got the actual market share numbers, either from TeleGeography, or otherwise?

    --

    --
    make install -not war

  20. Re:Sounds fantastic! (...fantastic) by makisupa001 · · Score: 1

    I hear (...eeaar) you loud ( .ooud) and quite staticky (...icky...icky) I'm in the same boat waiting for an LNP back to my baby bell

  21. In Soviet Russia... by FlyByPC · · Score: 1

    ...Voice-over-IP subscribes to *YOU*! Seriously, I think VoIP is just another step towards convergence -- where all anyone will need for communications is a TCP/IP feed in your choice of broadband flavors, for everything from telephone service to surfing to music and TV entertainment. All on-demand and customizable. (The only hitch is making sure some semblance of privacy remains.)

    --
    Paleotechnologist and connoisseur of pretty shiny things.
  22. Vonage might have more subscribers by Fear+the+Clam · · Score: 1

    If their commercials weren't so fucking annoying.

    1. Re:Vonage might have more subscribers by certron · · Score: 1

      Personally, I think they should put that song to rest. Also, if they want to get more subscribers, sure, the price is good, but how about advertising some of those features they give at no extra cost?

      --

      fair.org counterpunch.com truthout.com indymedia.org salon.com
      eff.org guerrilla.net debian.org gentoo.org
  23. Re:Sounds fantastic! (...fantastic) by bitingduck · · Score: 1

    I've had vonage for a while, and most of the time it sounds way better than my landline (which I still have with minimum service, since cells don't work near my house).

    The only time it's been choppy is when I used 4 way calling (I call family member who has 3-way, and then we each add another person) and two people try to talk at once. It's not as bad on 3-way, but I think that's because there are fewer times when both other people are trying to talk at once.

  24. VOIP is idiotware by Geak · · Score: 0

    DSL sucks up here in Canada. (Trust me I work for a DSL provider and I stick with my cable internet) There is a ridiculous amount of downtime for DSL internet because the technology is flaky to begin with. E.G. - big lightning storm yesterday knocked out my girlfriends DSL. Phone lines still worked though. Do you really want your most important means of communication to rely on something as unstable as the internet? Suppose lightning hit my girlfriends place yesterday and set it on fire. If she was using voip instead of her phone line she would have no way to call for help. I get VOIP subscribers calling me constantly at work to troubleshoot their slow speed problems but their sync rate is so low that their phone keeps cutting in and out. It's frustrating. Why would anybody want VOIP? I prefer to keep thing simple. Use the right tool for the right job. Phone lines are for making phone calls, the internet is for surfing porn.

    1. Re:VOIP is idiotware by petermgreen · · Score: 1

      i tend to agree relying on voip is probablly not sensible with the current state of domestic internet access.

      but using something and relying on it are different things entirely

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
    2. Re:VOIP is idiotware by Geak · · Score: 0

      Yes - true but unfortunately most, if not all of the people I get calls from that are using VOIP have cancelled their local phone line. So they are relying on it. Then again - most of the people I get calls from shouldn't even be using a computer, let alone any electronic device without supervision. Its amazing they figured out the complexities of using a telephone to call me in the first place. Perhaps they just dial "0" and ask to be connected.

  25. Bell beta works great by nevdullc · · Score: 1

    I've been Beta testing Bell.ca's Internet Voice for about a year now,
    It works great, there were a few slight hiccups at rst (mostly dealing with my non standard [not a store-bought router firewall situation) but that's all long since been resolved. I've taken it all over the place and it works great on any high speed connection. As more people discover computers and what they can do with them, more people will adopt this type of tech, anyone who can grasp the concept of configuring their home networking router (eg. pointing a browser at 192.168.0.1 etc..) will have no problem setting up a voIP adapter. I think a lot of tech still has to be simplified for the masses, but the quality is ready for prime time, I haven't paid a long distance bill in a year.. yippee!
    /nev/dull/c

    --
    Cthulhu Saves -- in case He's hungry later.
  26. The Technology Leapfrog effect by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I see a few posts bragging about these numbers. Stop now before you embarass yourself.

    For example, the biggest VOIP company in Japan, Softbank has about 4.4 million VoIP customers.


    Your number are not worth braggng about. Often contries with less infrastructure will leap frog countries with far more.

    For example the fastest growing cell phone, sat phone, satellite dish market in the world is Iraq. They were not allowed these devices under Saddam and now that they can have them, they now have more cell phones than land lines. Should we all envy thier position right now?

    The US has a massive investment in copper -- and has for a century. It is silly to think that we will abondon a WORKING technology to be on the bleeding edge when we don't need to. I have 3 (count them 3) broadband lines into my home... I also have a PSTN phone. Why? Because it works. I don't need one more thing in my life that needs firmware upgrades (et al) to work, I need a damn phone.

    I've never understood why people brag about adoption rates of technology. Humans tend to migrate to new technology when it offers a signifigant performance gain over existing technology. (see also Iraq)

    If XXXXX country has more cell phones than YYY country it is probably becasue the solution they had previously sucked, so the upgraded was of more worth to the population.

    So to coin a phrase: Stop now before you embarass yourself.

  27. take GREAT care with skype by petermgreen · · Score: 1

    if you give it the access it needs to become a supernode it can really rape your connection maxing out 100mbit is not unheared of!

    --
    note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
  28. VOIP Buster -- why pay for outgoing voip? by OsirisX11 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    It is free after the first euro. then its unlimited free international calling, i love it. :)
    http://www.voipbuster.com/

  29. (Somewhat O/T) How do you like Voicepulse? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well it's not really off topic. I'd rather a review from an unknown slashdotter than 10 marketing web pages.

    PSTN connect?

    1. Re:(Somewhat O/T) How do you like Voicepulse? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Voicepulse is pure shit (as almost every retail voip offering is). If you're looking for the least sucky of the bunch, try broadvoice.

  30. 30% of broadband users have never heard of VoIP by westlake · · Score: 1
    POTS doesn't need a death watch yet, but it's certainly moving that way.

    TeleGeography's own survey concluded that 30% of U.S. broadband subscribers have never heard of VoIP and that only 30% of online households would consider replacing a landline if "automatic" 911 was not part of the service. (June 15th)

  31. Minus One by nicktripp · · Score: 1

    2.7 Million minus one. As of this afternoon I am cancelling my Vonage account. Why? I waited a year for them to pick up my local area code and exchange, which they said was coming when I signed up. It didn't come fast enough. Sorry, Vonage.

    IF I decided to put VoIP back in service in my home (as opposed to just using our cells), it will be with Packet8. Packet8 not only has my area code and exchange, they also have E911 service for my area (and most other areas) AND they're cheaper.

    1. Re:Minus One by beeswax · · Score: 1

      I have had packet8 for over a year now. The VOIP service has been good.

      The customer support is incompetent, it took 3 calls until I found someone willing to fix the extra charge on my account. Email support never answers.

    2. Re:Minus One by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You'll like packet8 until you try to use it... There are many others like broadvoice, voipexinc, etc... www.voip-info.org www.voxilla.org

  32. Vonage is shady by DoctorHibbert · · Score: 1

    See here: Fuck Vonage

    Lots of great comments there too.

    --
    Arbitrary sig
  33. Vonage reaching 1 million by certron · · Score: 1

    Vonage is running a promotion in preparation for welcoming their 1 millionth line / customer / whatever. It looks like you can play only once a day, but it might be something to put on your list of things to do when you get in or out of work...

    --

    fair.org counterpunch.com truthout.com indymedia.org salon.com
    eff.org guerrilla.net debian.org gentoo.org
  34. Re:Sounds fantastic! (...fantastic) by fiji · · Score: 1

    Heh.

    But if you are seriously concerned about your line, try http://testyourvoip.com/. It is a free service and allows you to keep a history of performance so you can try a few times and see if the service degrades at any particular time.

    -ben

  35. Not 1 hour.. 1 minute by PorkNutz · · Score: 1
    From the VoipBuster Website:

    At VoipBuster, you can call any regular land based telephone in any of the countries listed in the right hand panel for FREE. However, to counter misuse of the network and reserve capacity we have limited these free calls to a maximum of 1 minute per call. In order to get UNLIMITED FREE CALLS upgrade your VoipBuster application, simply by buying 1,- worth of credit.

    1. Re:Not 1 hour.. 1 minute by Grey+Ninja · · Score: 1

      Hey, I use the software. It's one minute if you don't have any credit. If you buy credit, the limit is raised to one hour.

  36. dont get vonage by blibblub · · Score: 1

    I had vonage for about 3 months. their service is great (no static, no downtime) but their customer service is horrible.
    I had to move and called them. they would repeatedly hang up on me. finally frustrated, I tried to cancel my service. it is simply impossible to cancel their service. they will just hang up on you. their customer service is terrible.