1) I'm not educating you 2) I don't care if you like me 3) I know I'm smart. I know I'm rich. Hey, if it makes you feel better, I'll say that I WISH I were a fool, if only because it's a step up from sexual deviant. 4) I'm being a pain in the ass on purpose.
Now the why: 1) I'm fucking with you, because you're easy to fuck with 2) I don't care what you think, I am only interested in WHY you think it. 3) I'm trying to get you to say something original. So far you're just marching in lockstep with your fellow libertarian robots. All the things you've said I've heard before, from people far stupider than you. No, that's not something you should be proud of.
So, give it up. I'm worse than what you say. Times two. Now, since you can't insult me any more, tell me something original. I want to know why your brain operates in such a fucked-up way.
Watch your spelling too. Every time you miss a punctuation mark whilst calling me a fool, it makes me cum.
No, it isn't more prudent to say that, because I am being partisan on purpose. You, on the other hand, do not have a choice. If I chose to, I could restate all my positions in such a way that you would not be able to tell that I was not a libertarian. I have that ability because I understand Libertarianism from a neutral point of view. If you were to pretend to be a liberal, you'd fail because you haven't been through the same exercise.
I'm mocking your narrow viewpoint. Even calling me a fool is a sign that you're ignorant of who and what I am. If you join me in my journal, we'll talk politics, and you won't be calling me a fool. You won't agree with me, but you won't call me a fool. I'll still call you sumdumass though.
Learn to read. I'm talking about the uneducated homeschooled fucks that I have met. All of them without exception have been complete numbskulls. I attribute that to their Jesus freak creationist parents who thought they could homeschool and are so ignorant they can't be proven wrong.
I've never met a homeschool proponent who could comprehend the written word worth two rat fucks. And judging by your poor writing skills, your little homeschooled rat fucks must be astoundingly ignorant. Why is it that the dumbest of us think they can homeschool? Perhaps it's because they don't know what they don't know. Sad, really.
I'm not agreeing or disagreeing with the judge. I'm saying the judge isn't an authority, and what he says is not evidence of the claim.
Finally, a point I can agree with you on. Schools are far too often horrible places for teachers to work. Does it make sense to blame teacher's unions for the problems? Let me ask you, would you want to work in an authoritarian dictatorial environment without the benefit of a union? Of course not. Fix the school administration, and a lot of the other problems will become a lot better.
And this judge is an education expert how exactly???
That's the trouble with you Libertarians. You talk big about how independent thinking and freedom loving you are, but as soon as a moron with some letters in front of his name says something, you're quoting it as if it was printed in a red letter Bible.
And what's wrong with kids being taught by teaching-parents with credentials? Teach them at home if you like, but I'll be damned if you're going to turn out some uneducated brats for the rest of the world to deal with.
I doubt your child is as well educated as you say, since you're seemingly incapable of stating the situation in CA accurately. You can't lie to me and then expect me to believe something else you say.
FYI, The goal is to institute standards on home schooling, not to abolish it.
Testing teachers for quality control is forbidden.
And is hiring administrators without huge egos that won't run schools like their personal kingdoms also forbidden?
State
Ahh, a Libertarian. Right. Why are you even commenting? You're not in favor of fixing public education, you're probably partial to dismantling it. There's not much constructive you can contribute if your goal is destructive.
Now consider the original published design goals for mandatory public education:
No, let's not. You can continue to live in the 1800's, but it's the 21st century and those goals aren't applicable any longer. If you think they are, then I can't help you.
I wonder if they'd be interested in analyzing the smoking ruins of at least 5 toilet bowls I have personally destroyed with mysterious oscillating rocket powered sound waves.
That's a search for "@ercot.com", and if you don't know, ERCOT runs the Texas power grid market. There's another one for the East grid, and another for the West. You can find them yourself.
Actually, I'm a consultant. So while you're busting your hump doing actual work, I don't have to do a damn thing and I still get paid... by your company!
Indeed. The puffer fish is not as well known as its cousin, the Babel Fish, but that should not let you from putting a puffer fish into your pocket and letting it get to work. You'll find that the puffer fish is a far better master of the sensual arts, and you'll not again be tempted by a blow job hamster which is, as I am sure you will agree, too little endowed in the lips, and to much endowed with the teeth.
You can't have a space elevator unless your center of gravity for the entire thing is at geosynchronous orbit. You need a counterweight only if you don't want your cable to be 44,600 miles long. In that case, geosynchronous orbit would be right at the middle of the cable, so you wouldn't need a weight on the far end to balance it.
I admit it. I'm the guy. Me. I am the entire market for the Britney Spears news. I love her. The media is just trying to cater to their market, which is me and me alone. I know that nobody else in the world loves Britney but me, and I can't help it. It's not my fault that NBC is just trying to keep me and only me happy. I'm sorry if you don't like it, but I'm important, you're not, and I want Britney 24x7.
Are you drunk? That post was almost incomprehensible.
Alright, I'll tell you. You're dying to know.
First, I'm under no illusions:
1) I'm not educating you
2) I don't care if you like me
3) I know I'm smart. I know I'm rich. Hey, if it makes you feel better, I'll say that I WISH I were a fool, if only because it's a step up from sexual deviant.
4) I'm being a pain in the ass on purpose.
Now the why:
1) I'm fucking with you, because you're easy to fuck with
2) I don't care what you think, I am only interested in WHY you think it.
3) I'm trying to get you to say something original. So far you're just marching in lockstep with your fellow libertarian robots. All the things you've said I've heard before, from people far stupider than you. No, that's not something you should be proud of.
So, give it up. I'm worse than what you say. Times two. Now, since you can't insult me any more, tell me something original. I want to know why your brain operates in such a fucked-up way.
Watch your spelling too. Every time you miss a punctuation mark whilst calling me a fool, it makes me cum.
You obviously have NO IDEA what I'm doing, do you? And how in the hell do you call someone a fool without understanding what they are doing?
Go ahead, ask me what I'm doing.
You can't imagine any possible way that the schools could be improved if they had proper funding, so that must mean that it's impossible, right?
Sorry, but everyone with a brain can see that a failure of your own limited imagination doesn't mean a real solution doesn't exist.
No, it isn't more prudent to say that, because I am being partisan on purpose. You, on the other hand, do not have a choice. If I chose to, I could restate all my positions in such a way that you would not be able to tell that I was not a libertarian. I have that ability because I understand Libertarianism from a neutral point of view. If you were to pretend to be a liberal, you'd fail because you haven't been through the same exercise.
I'm mocking your narrow viewpoint. Even calling me a fool is a sign that you're ignorant of who and what I am. If you join me in my journal, we'll talk politics, and you won't be calling me a fool. You won't agree with me, but you won't call me a fool. I'll still call you sumdumass though.
Learn to read. I'm talking about the uneducated homeschooled fucks that I have met. All of them without exception have been complete numbskulls. I attribute that to their Jesus freak creationist parents who thought they could homeschool and are so ignorant they can't be proven wrong.
I've never met a homeschool proponent who could comprehend the written word worth two rat fucks. And judging by your poor writing skills, your little homeschooled rat fucks must be astoundingly ignorant. Why is it that the dumbest of us think they can homeschool? Perhaps it's because they don't know what they don't know. Sad, really.
I'm not agreeing or disagreeing with the judge. I'm saying the judge isn't an authority, and what he says is not evidence of the claim.
Now you're just talking nonsense.
Well then, in that case, carry on.
Finally, a point I can agree with you on. Schools are far too often horrible places for teachers to work. Does it make sense to blame teacher's unions for the problems? Let me ask you, would you want to work in an authoritarian dictatorial environment without the benefit of a union? Of course not. Fix the school administration, and a lot of the other problems will become a lot better.
Obviously you've been brainwashed. You can't compose a sentence without using a right-wing buzzword (unions, tenure, indoctrination, sensitivity, PC).
If there's a group of people who have all appearances of being centrally controlled, it's the "independent" Libertarian conservatives.
And this judge is an education expert how exactly???
That's the trouble with you Libertarians. You talk big about how independent thinking and freedom loving you are, but as soon as a moron with some letters in front of his name says something, you're quoting it as if it was printed in a red letter Bible.
And what's wrong with kids being taught by teaching-parents with credentials? Teach them at home if you like, but I'll be damned if you're going to turn out some uneducated brats for the rest of the world to deal with.
I doubt your child is as well educated as you say, since you're seemingly incapable of stating the situation in CA accurately. You can't lie to me and then expect me to believe something else you say.
FYI, The goal is to institute standards on home schooling, not to abolish it.
Are you joking? Higher pay lets you hire more qualified people. That includes better administrators too.
Testing teachers for quality control is forbidden.
And is hiring administrators without huge egos that won't run schools like their personal kingdoms also forbidden?
State
Ahh, a Libertarian. Right. Why are you even commenting? You're not in favor of fixing public education, you're probably partial to dismantling it. There's not much constructive you can contribute if your goal is destructive.
Now consider the original published design goals for mandatory public education:
No, let's not. You can continue to live in the 1800's, but it's the 21st century and those goals aren't applicable any longer. If you think they are, then I can't help you.
I'm always amazed at the number of conservatives who believe that more money always buys a better gun, but more money can't buy a better teacher.
I wonder if they'd be interested in analyzing the smoking ruins of at least 5 toilet bowls I have personally destroyed with mysterious oscillating rocket powered sound waves.
Google can help you pick your target.
http://www.google.com/search?q=%40ercot.com&btnG=Search&hl=en&safe=off&rlz=1B3GGGL_enUS264US264
That's a search for "@ercot.com", and if you don't know, ERCOT runs the Texas power grid market. There's another one for the East grid, and another for the West. You can find them yourself.
That's the last straw, it's back to telnet for me. Bastards.
If you can't dig up the instructions on how to become a PI, then perhaps that line of work is not for you!
Actually, I'm a consultant. So while you're busting your hump doing actual work, I don't have to do a damn thing and I still get paid ... by your company!
Do I win?
Mostrosity? Have you looked at java.com lately? That website is a tangle of twisty little API's, all alike.
Indeed. The puffer fish is not as well known as its cousin, the Babel Fish, but that should not let you from putting a puffer fish into your pocket and letting it get to work. You'll find that the puffer fish is a far better master of the sensual arts, and you'll not again be tempted by a blow job hamster which is, as I am sure you will agree, too little endowed in the lips, and to much endowed with the teeth.
You can't have a space elevator unless your center of gravity for the entire thing is at geosynchronous orbit. You need a counterweight only if you don't want your cable to be 44,600 miles long. In that case, geosynchronous orbit would be right at the middle of the cable, so you wouldn't need a weight on the far end to balance it.
I admit it. I'm the guy. Me. I am the entire market for the Britney Spears news. I love her. The media is just trying to cater to their market, which is me and me alone. I know that nobody else in the world loves Britney but me, and I can't help it. It's not my fault that NBC is just trying to keep me and only me happy. I'm sorry if you don't like it, but I'm important, you're not, and I want Britney 24x7.
Signed, the Solipsist.