We finally come up with a solution that will stop the Iraq war once and for all, and now they are trying to stop it. Do these people love war or something?
A simple no is not sufficient for me to maintain the reputation which justifies my foul nickname! One thing that you may find helpful, which just came to mind, is to go to the google news page, then on the left create a news alert for the keywords "dominionism" "dominionism family" "dominionism clinton" "council for national policy" and so on. Google search on those terms too.
And do some reading on the Google search "chick-fil-a hobby lobby". Seriously. Really.
But even that amount of Green cannot make up for all the hot air spewed by talking heads worldwide for so many decades with respect to the German contribution to Internet argumentation: Adolph Hitler.
There are two ways to solve computer problems. According to the pointy hairs, either you add another level of indirection, or you build an API. Anyway, I hope you like your hundreds of thousands of brand new function calls.
I know what a mason is, being familiar with all the conspiracy theories and having enough knowlege to understand what a joke they are.
The difference is that dominionists are real, and you don't need theories to understand what they are about. Just listen to their words and read their books. The heresy is even treated with derision by mainstream entities such as several church denominations.
I'm starting to think that you're just a big jerk. Do you just want to have a contest to see who is the bigger jerk? You shall not win that one.
I'm not going to do your research for you. The dominionists are Christians. I am an atheist, and I see it as primarily YOUR responsibility to keep your crazier brethren in line. But, I don't see masses of Christians denouncing dominionists forcefully enough. Indeed, some of you take the idiotic calculus of siding with them just because they call themselves "Christians".
The United States has been going to war with regularity since their Revolution. Only a few times have they been attacked directly. Warmonger is hardly an apt term for them. It's more like warMAKER.
The temptation is to say that protecting states rights is the same thing as protecting individual rights. In fact, that's the kind of sloppy argument which works so well on morons, which I encourage kings and royalty everywhere to use when controlling the oh so tiresome "independent" common rabble.
There, that ought to attract lots of flames. Now my point is that protecting states rights is the same thing as protecting individual rights ONLY where the two coincide. In a lot of cases - slavery comes to mind - protecting states' rights is the opposite of protecting individual rights. Don't conflate the two, they are not the same thing.
Masonic club? I have no idea what that would mean. The Family is a dominionist organization, intent in enslaving everybody to the will of God and law of the Bible. That's a horrible thing, as I am sure you would agree. Go to a library and start digging. The Internet has a few things which can get you started. Just google for "dominionism family" and "dominionism" then dig from there.
As far as free will goes, read a book please. You don't have free will, just the illusion of a free will. Before you even argue with me, just try to come up with a satisfactory definition of free will. You're going to have trouble, I promise you. It's an indication that whereas you thought you had a good idea of what free will is, you're actually sorrily confused and need to spend some time thinking.
I think that's correct. The best stuff isn't on the Internet. And Dominionists in particular are not on the Internet. In 20 years, there will be a crop of Dominionist politicians who are inscrutable to the vast majority who rely on the Internet for all their information. Young students, even down into the grade school level, are strictly cautioned against appearing on the Internet at all under their real names. The Dominionists are savvy and dangerous, and they are well aware that everything online can be tracked. Their goal is to produce a group of young politicians who are able to survive and avoid the sort of attacks that ordinary children who have had every misstep documented on MySpace and Facebook will fall to.
The Dominionists are to ordinary Christians as the Taliban is to ordinary Muslims.
No, you should do the research that will eventually lead you to the Family. Then, you'll have had a full education on the dark world of Christian Dominionism.
Hillary is a member of the Family. If you know what that is, you already knew that. If you didn't know what that is, then you should look it up.
Plus, what did Obama's minister say that was all that bad? If you're a moron and only listen to the sound byte, then you're going to be fooled, because it's your fate in life to be fooled. If you're a thinking person and dig a little deeper, the attempt to smear Obama is transparent.
I never get this particular pot-shot at the C++ language. This issue has bitten me exactly... never... times.
Back in the day, and that means the early 90's, the stream classes were used far more often than they are today. They were badly documented and generally a mess to use.
I just got bit by some old code the other day. If you're using an ostrstream, they're not null terminated. It says "str" which leads you to believe you're dealing with strings. But, you're not. ostrstream a; a "123"; writes exactly three bytes into memory, not 4 as you would expect if you were dealing with a string. Later, when you try to strlen the thing, it dies a horrible death. The str() function doesn't return a pointer to a string. It shouldn't be called str() then, right?
That's just one little thing. The old stream libs are full of traps like that, which is why you see people only really using iostream to print things to stdout and stderr, but revert to the good old trusty C functions with civilized semantics and decent naming to write and read files.
All you people who prefer the window manager KDE over the window manager Gnome are morons. They aren't window managers. And quit calling it X Windows. There's no 's' on that. There's no 's' on Lego either. Morons.
I'm really enjoying all the stuff you're making up and then attributing to environmentalists, and then dismissing the environmentalists because of all the stuff you made up about them.
Why not just realize that "environmentalists" is just another name for a huge number of individuals, with different levels of knowlege and different goals. Making generalizations about such a large number of people - especially such amusingly wrongheaded generalizations - doesn't help much, except to identify faulty thinking processes on your part.
Knowing the exact 3D distance to the target isn't that useful to know. It really does nothing to change the basic method of staying in motion until you hit the warm wet spot.
Wouldn't an arc just fry the dust bunny, annihilating it instantaneously, releasing a burst of fragrance similar to burning hair? That's a pretty neat trick for a laptop.
That would explain the claims by various religions that god can be found to exist at various arbitrary points in the past, and indeed could exist infinitely in the past. The faster than light time inversion would also explain some of the conjecture about a deities' knowlege of events in our subjective future. And all this superluminal travel would hint and just what a god needs with a starship anyways.
We finally come up with a solution that will stop the Iraq war once and for all, and now they are trying to stop it. Do these people love war or something?
A simple no is not sufficient for me to maintain the reputation which justifies my foul nickname! One thing that you may find helpful, which just came to mind, is to go to the google news page, then on the left create a news alert for the keywords "dominionism" "dominionism family" "dominionism clinton" "council for national policy" and so on. Google search on those terms too.
And do some reading on the Google search "chick-fil-a hobby lobby". Seriously. Really.
One..Two..Three..CRUNCH...Ouch
The answer is that it takes three licks to get to the center of a standard Rubik's cube.
But even that amount of Green cannot make up for all the hot air spewed by talking heads worldwide for so many decades with respect to the German contribution to Internet argumentation: Adolph Hitler.
There. Godwin'ed. Fuck you all.
Jon Katz discovered that the geek audience is too smart to fool for long, so he found an audience that eats his crap up and doesn't complain: overweight divorced woman with little yappy dogs. you can see it for yourself if you like. Or you can listen to him
sweet-talk the lovely Diane Rehm on her NPR interview program.
But what's this? Katz fucked up again! Border Collies are supposed to be smart dogs, and apparently their owners aren't buying Katz' bullshit either. Just read how they people rip him to shreds. Katz had his dog Orson killed because he couldn't be bothered to train him! These dog owners judged Katz just like we computer geeks judged him. He's a writer looking for an easy market to sell books to.
There are two ways to solve computer problems. According to the pointy hairs, either you add another level of indirection, or you build an API. Anyway, I hope you like your hundreds of thousands of brand new function calls.
And eat lunch at the same time.
I know what a mason is, being familiar with all the conspiracy theories and having enough knowlege to understand what a joke they are.
The difference is that dominionists are real, and you don't need theories to understand what they are about. Just listen to their words and read their books. The heresy is even treated with derision by mainstream entities such as several church denominations.
I'm starting to think that you're just a big jerk. Do you just want to have a contest to see who is the bigger jerk? You shall not win that one.
I'm not going to do your research for you. The dominionists are Christians. I am an atheist, and I see it as primarily YOUR responsibility to keep your crazier brethren in line. But, I don't see masses of Christians denouncing dominionists forcefully enough. Indeed, some of you take the idiotic calculus of siding with them just because they call themselves "Christians".
The United States has been going to war with regularity since their Revolution. Only a few times have they been attacked directly. Warmonger is hardly an apt term for them. It's more like warMAKER.
The temptation is to say that protecting states rights is the same thing as protecting individual rights. In fact, that's the kind of sloppy argument which works so well on morons, which I encourage kings and royalty everywhere to use when controlling the oh so tiresome "independent" common rabble.
There, that ought to attract lots of flames. Now my point is that protecting states rights is the same thing as protecting individual rights ONLY where the two coincide. In a lot of cases - slavery comes to mind - protecting states' rights is the opposite of protecting individual rights. Don't conflate the two, they are not the same thing.
Masonic club? I have no idea what that would mean. The Family is a dominionist organization, intent in enslaving everybody to the will of God and law of the Bible. That's a horrible thing, as I am sure you would agree. Go to a library and start digging. The Internet has a few things which can get you started. Just google for "dominionism family" and "dominionism" then dig from there.
As far as free will goes, read a book please. You don't have free will, just the illusion of a free will. Before you even argue with me, just try to come up with a satisfactory definition of free will. You're going to have trouble, I promise you. It's an indication that whereas you thought you had a good idea of what free will is, you're actually sorrily confused and need to spend some time thinking.
I think that's correct. The best stuff isn't on the Internet. And Dominionists in particular are not on the Internet. In 20 years, there will be a crop of Dominionist politicians who are inscrutable to the vast majority who rely on the Internet for all their information. Young students, even down into the grade school level, are strictly cautioned against appearing on the Internet at all under their real names. The Dominionists are savvy and dangerous, and they are well aware that everything online can be tracked. Their goal is to produce a group of young politicians who are able to survive and avoid the sort of attacks that ordinary children who have had every misstep documented on MySpace and Facebook will fall to.
The Dominionists are to ordinary Christians as the Taliban is to ordinary Muslims.
If all you watch is Fox News, and all you listen to is Clinton, then I agree. That's all you know.
No, you should do the research that will eventually lead you to the Family. Then, you'll have had a full education on the dark world of Christian Dominionism.
Hillary is a member of the Family. If you know what that is, you already knew that. If you didn't know what that is, then you should look it up.
Plus, what did Obama's minister say that was all that bad? If you're a moron and only listen to the sound byte, then you're going to be fooled, because it's your fate in life to be fooled. If you're a thinking person and dig a little deeper, the attempt to smear Obama is transparent.
I never get this particular pot-shot at the C++ language. This issue has bitten me exactly ... never ... times.
Back in the day, and that means the early 90's, the stream classes were used far more often than they are today. They were badly documented and generally a mess to use.
I just got bit by some old code the other day. If you're using an ostrstream, they're not null terminated. It says "str" which leads you to believe you're dealing with strings. But, you're not. ostrstream a; a "123"; writes exactly three bytes into memory, not 4 as you would expect if you were dealing with a string. Later, when you try to strlen the thing, it dies a horrible death. The str() function doesn't return a pointer to a string. It shouldn't be called str() then, right?
That's just one little thing. The old stream libs are full of traps like that, which is why you see people only really using iostream to print things to stdout and stderr, but revert to the good old trusty C functions with civilized semantics and decent naming to write and read files.
All you people who prefer the window manager KDE over the window manager Gnome are morons. They aren't window managers. And quit calling it X Windows. There's no 's' on that. There's no 's' on Lego either. Morons.
I'm really enjoying all the stuff you're making up and then attributing to environmentalists, and then dismissing the environmentalists because of all the stuff you made up about them.
Why not just realize that "environmentalists" is just another name for a huge number of individuals, with different levels of knowlege and different goals. Making generalizations about such a large number of people - especially such amusingly wrongheaded generalizations - doesn't help much, except to identify faulty thinking processes on your part.
She's a cylon with a snuke in her snizz.
Better not tell anyone about the chief, or Col. Tigh, or Tory the Prez's bitch, or Sam the stud. That would ruin everything.
Knowing the exact 3D distance to the target isn't that useful to know. It really does nothing to change the basic method of staying in motion until you hit the warm wet spot.
Wouldn't an arc just fry the dust bunny, annihilating it instantaneously, releasing a burst of fragrance similar to burning hair? That's a pretty neat trick for a laptop.
Excessive fart humor? That's un-PPPPHHHHHFFFFFFFTTTTT-possible!
I'm a consultant, and I'm wondering what the billing rate times a fuckton is going to total out to.
That would explain the claims by various religions that god can be found to exist at various arbitrary points in the past, and indeed could exist infinitely in the past. The faster than light time inversion would also explain some of the conjecture about a deities' knowlege of events in our subjective future. And all this superluminal travel would hint and just what a god needs with a starship anyways.